DOCSLIB.ORG

East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement East West Rail Consortium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement East West Rail Consortium East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement East West Rail Consortium Final Report 8 August 2014 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement This page is intentionally blank Atkins EWR Central Section COS | Version 2.2 | 8 August 2014 | 5123752 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for East West Rail Consortium’s information and use in relation to the East West Rail Central Section. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 130 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5123752 Document ref: ITT 28744 Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Final Report for Client PB PB AJC AJC 17/4/14 Review Rev 2.0 Final Report for Issue PB PB AJC AJC 14/5/14 Rev 2.1 Minor amendments PB PB AJC AJC 20/5/14 Rev 2.2 Revised GVA Calculations PB PB AJC AJC 8/8/14 Client signoff Client East West Rail Consortium Project East West Rail - Central Section Document title EWR Central Section COS Job no. 5123752 Copy no. Document ITT 28744 reference Atkins EWR Central Section COS | Version 2.2 | 8 August 2014 | 5123752 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement This page is intentionally blank Atkins EWR Central Section COS | Version 2.2 | 8 August 2014 | 5123752 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement Table of contents Chapter Pages Executive summary 9 1. Introduction 21 1.1. Background to Study 21 1.2. Strategic Objectives 21 1.3. The Study Area 21 1.4. Strategic Objectives 22 1.5. Our Approach 23 2. Economic Analysis Evidence Base 25 2.1. National Context 25 2.2. Sub-Regional Context 28 2.3. Basis for the Economic Analysis 37 3. Transport Networks Evidence Base 45 3.1. Highway Networks 45 3.2. Rail Network 47 4. Evidence Base Conclusions 51 5. The approach to identifying Passenger Service Conditional Outputs 53 5.1. Summary of Process 53 5.2. Factors that will influence EWR-CS service viability 53 5.3. Initial location identification and sifting 54 5.4. Deriving target EWR-CS service specifications 54 5.5. Journey Time Impacts of EWR-CS 57 5.6. Transport User Benefits 58 5.7. Estimating GVA Impacts 58 6. Prioritisation results 61 6.1. Journey Pair Benefits Analysis 61 6.2. Conclusions 65 7. Passenger Service Conditional Outputs 67 7.1. Interpreting the Passenger Service Conditional Outputs 72 8. Freight Service Conditional Outputs 73 9. Next Steps 75 Appendices 77 Appendix A. Economic Analysis Evidence Base 79 A.1. Supporting Analysis 79 Appendix B. Highway Networks Evidence Base 89 B.2. Highway Demand 91 B.3. Highways Agency Schemes 94 B.4. Local Authority/LEP Schemes 94 Appendix C. Rail Network Evidence Base 95 C.1. Reference case rail demand forecasts for 2031. 97 C.2. Rail Freight 99 Appendix D. Developing the Conditional Outputs 101 D.1. Sifting Criteria 101 D.2. EWR-CS Journey Times 102 D.3. Journey Pair Trip Classification 104 Atkins EWR Central Section COS | Version 2.2 | 8 August 2014 | 5123752 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement D.4. Journey time competitiveness 105 D.5. Potential for Journey Enhancement 106 D.6. Identified priority journey pairs to “test” 107 D.7. Indicative EWR-CS rail in-vehicle times 108 D.8. Change in GJT’s: Do Something minus Do Minimum (where DM is reference case including EWR-WS) 109 D.9. Do Something Passenger Demand 2031 (NTEM/Tempro growth scenario) 110 D.10. Do Something minus Do Minimum Demand (NTEM/Tempro growth scenario) 111 D.11. Do Something Passenger Demand 2031 (Local Plan growth scenario) 112 D.12. Do Something minus Do Minimum Demand (Local Plan growth scenario) 113 D.13. Do Something Passenger miles (NTEM/Tempro growth) 114 D.14. DS - DM Passenger miles (NTEM/Tempro growth) 115 D.15. DS Passenger miles (Local Plan growth) 116 D.16. DS - DM Passenger miles (Local Plan growth) 117 Appendix E. Gravity Modelling 119 E.1. Introduction 119 E.2. Service Assumptions 119 E.3. Model Scope 119 E.4. GJTs 120 E.5. Elasticity Approach 121 E.6. Gravity Approach 122 Appendix F. Prioritisation Results 125 F.1. Journey Times < 15 Minutes 125 F.2. Journey Times 15 – 30 minutes 126 F.3. Journey Times 30 – 60 Minutes 127 F.4. Journey Times > 60 minutes 128 Tables Table 2-1 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – Hertfordshire LEP .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 2-2 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – New Anglia LEP .......................................................................................................................................... 30 Table 2-3 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – Greater Cambridge & Peterborough LEP ............................................................................................. 31 Table 2-4 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – Buckinghamshire & Thames Valley LEP ................................................................................. 32 Table 2-5 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – Thames Valley Berkshire LEP .......................................................................................................................... 32 Table 2-6 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – Oxfordshire LEP .......................................................................................................................................... 33 Table 2-7 Development opportunities within close proximity to potential EWR Stations – South East Midlands LEP ........................................................................................................................... 35 Table 2-8 Key Economic Metrics at LEP level ......................................................................................... 36 Table 2-9 Comparison of Local Plan and NTEM based Growth Forecasts in EWR-CS Study Area ...... 37 Table 2-10 Local Plan and NTEM/Tempro Population Forecasts to 2031 ................................................ 38 Table 2-11 Local Plan and NTEM/Tempro Employment Forecasts to 2031 ............................................. 38 Table 2-12 Population Ranking (within 5km catchments) .......................................................................... 40 Table 2-13 Employment Ranking (based upon 5km catchment areas) ..................................................... 42 Table 2-14 Summary of potential development opportunities within 500m of station locations ................ 43 Table 3-1 2014 Weekday Peak Highway Journey Times (minutes) – Source: Transport Direct ............ 45 Table 3-2 Current level of Main Line Utilisation (2014 AM Peak period 0700 – 0959) ............................ 48 Table 3-3 Network Rail schemes confirmed for CP5/CP6 ....................................................................... 48 Table 3-4 Local Authority & Developer schemes confirmed for CP5/CP6 .............................................. 49 Table 3-5 Current level of Main Line Utilisation (2026 AM Peak period 0700 – 0959) ............................ 49 Atkins EWR Central Section COS | Version 2.2 | 8 August 2014 | 5123752 East West Rail - Central Section Conditional Outputs Statement Table 5-1 Summary of Key B2B Impacts (assuming NTEM/Tempro Growth Forecasts) ....................... 59 Table 5-2 Summary of Key Labour Market Impacts (assuming NTEM/Tempro Growth Forecasts) ....... 60 Table 6-1 Priority Journey Pairs: < 15 minutes journey time (2031 NTEM/Tempro Growth) .................. 62 Table 6-2 Priority Journey Pairs: < 15 minutes journey time (2031 Local Plan Growth) ......................... 62 Table 6-3 Priority Journey Pairs: 15 - 30 min’s journey time (2031 NTEM/Tempro Growth) .................. 63 Table 6-4 Priority Journey Pairs: 15 - 30 min’s journey time (2031 Local Plan Growth) ......................... 63 Table 6-5 Priority Journey Pairs: 30 - 60 min’s journey time (2031 NTEM/Tempro Growth) .................. 64 Table 6-6 Priority Journey Pairs: 30 - 60 min’s journey time (2031 Local Plan Growth) ......................... 64 Table 6-7 Priority Journey Pairs: > 60 min’s journey time (2031 NTEM/Tempro Growth) ...................... 65 Table 7-1 Passenger Service Conditional Outputs for journeys of up to 15 minutes duration (NTEM/Tempro Growth to 2031) ............................................................................................. 67 Table 7-2 Passenger Service Conditional Outputs for journeys of up to 15 minutes duration (Local Plan Growth to 2031) ....................................................................................................................... 68 Table 7-3 Passenger Service Conditional Outputs for journeys of 15 to 30 minutes duration (NTEM/Tempro Growth to 2031) ............................................................................................. 68 Table 7-4 Passenger Service Conditional Outputs for journeys of 15 to 30 minutes duration (Local Plan Growth to 2031) ....................................................................................................................... 69 Table 7-5 Passenger Service Conditional Outputs for journeys of 30 to 60 minutes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Page 1 West Anglia
    Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Appendix1 West Anglia Mainline Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Broxbourne 4-tracking & CR2 to be given higher profile - Include CR2 on page 14 but Borough Council e.g. on pages 4 & 32 & in figure 2.2 on page not on pages 4 & 32 as 14. Include Ambition Broxbourne's aspiration these figures list existing of Cheshunt as strategic hub with CR2, links services and lines. Include to Stratford, London & Stansted, and reference to Ambition significant development around the station Broxbourne's aspiration of associated with a potential redevelopment of Cheshunt as strategic hub, Delamare Road. Include lobbying for early and of lobbying for early safeguarding of regional CR2 route. CR2 safeguarding of regional route. Cambridgeshire Include addressing single track tunnel at Single track tunnel at None. County Council Stansted to improve journey times & capacity Stansted as constraint for all services, from the north & south. already included in Strategy. East Herts District Objects to wording on page 41 re - HCC not pursuing Hertford Council investigation into the implementation of East as CR2 terminus and development around Hertford East branch so text will be removed. stations. Serious constraints of implementing Amend text on page 40 re CR2 in East Herts should be recognised. Ware platform. There was never a second platform at Ware (page 40). Hertford Town Appropriate service mix with more semi-fasts - Include reference to semi- Council to London, and longer term to Liverpool St. fasts including to Liverpool St. Hertfordshire Lobby for Hertford East & Harlow as northern HCC not pursuing Hertford None.
    [Show full text]
  • East West Rail Western Section Phase 2
    EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 CONSULTATION INFORMATION DOCUMENT JUNE 2017 Document Reference 133735-PBR-REP-EEN-000026 Author Network Rail Date June 2017 Date of revision and June 2017 revision number 2.0 The Network Rail (East West Rail Western Section Phase 2) Order Consultation Information Document TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Purpose of this consultation ...................................................................... 2 2.2 Structure of this consultation ..................................................................... 2 3. EAST WEST RAIL .............................................................................................. 4 3.1 Background ............................................................................................... 4 3.2 EWR Western Section ............................................................................... 5 4. EAST WEST RAIL WESTERN SECTION PHASE 2 .......................................... 8 4.1 Benefits ..................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Location ..................................................................................................... 8 4.3 Consenting considerations ...................................................................... 11 4.4 Interface with the High Speed
    [Show full text]
  • Watford Station Closure Panel
    Watford Station Closure Panel Document L Final Report, 28 08 2012 Author: Vincent Stops Final report of the consideration by London TravelWatch of the proposed closure and discontinuance of services to and from Watford station 1 Purpose of report 1.1 To set out the background and process undertaken as part of the consideration of the proposed closure and discontinuance of services to and from Watford station. 1.2 To summarise London Underground Limited’s (LUL’s) case for the closure, the concerns of passengers and the conclusions of Panel members consideration of the issues. 1.3 To report to the Mayor of London any hardship that would result from the closure, should it proceed. 1.4 To report to the Mayor of London measures that would alleviate hardship resulting from the closure, should it proceed. 1.5 To report any other conclusions from London TravelWatch’s consideration of the closure. 2 Background 2.1 Watford station is one of the northern terminal stations on the Metropolitan line. There is a long-standing aspiration to divert the Metropolitan line, via the former Croxley Green branch line, to terminate at Watford Junction station. This would entail a short section of new railway being built to connect the Metropolitan line to the former Croxley Green branch line. The Link would have two new accessible stations at Ascot Road and Vicarage Road and connect to Watford Junction station via Watford High Street station. The project is known as the Croxley Rail Link. See Appendices A & B below for schematics of the existing and proposed Metropolitan line.
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
    FFerr A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report March 2016 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Project no: B2074900 Document title: Option Assessment Report Document No.: B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 Revision: 0 Date: 17 March 2016 Client name: Highways England Client no: Project manager: Simon Beaney Author: Robert Benson Jacobs U.K. Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 0 29/01/2016 Draft for client review RB SM/DW SB 1 17/03/2016 Final RB TB SB B2074900/A6S/JAC/A428/XX/RP/PM/00025 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Option Assessment Report Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of report ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Overview of assessment ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Template
    Bletchley and Fenny Stratford Town Council There will be a meeting of the Finance Committee on Tuesday, 29th June, 2021 at Newton Leys Pavilion - NLP commencing at 7.30 pm to transact the items of business set out in the agenda below. Delia Shephard Clerk to the Council Monday, 21 June 2021 A G E N D A 1. To note Members' apologies for absence 2. To note Members' declarations of interest in matters on the agenda (Under the Relevant Authorities (Disclosable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations 2012, made under s30 (3) of the Localism Act, members are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests which they may have in any of the items under consideration at this meeting) 3. To approve the minutes of the previous committee meeting (Pages 1 - 4) 4. To elect a Chair of the Committee 5. Public speaking time To receive representations or questions from members of the public on matters on the agenda (please note this item will generally be restricted to a maximum of 15 minutes in total, individuals may speak for a maximum of 3 minutes each). Members of the public who wish to attend and/or make spoken representations at the meeting should contact the Town Clerk (ideally by email) no later than 12 noon on the day before the day of the meeting for information about the Covid19 safety measures in place at the meeting venue. Written representations from those who do not wish to physically attend our meeting should be submitted by email to arrive no later than 12 noon on the day before the day of the meeting using the email address below.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Cambridge Arc Number CDP-2021-0124 by Fintan Codd, David Hirst, Adam Clark 12 July 2021
    Debate Pack Oxford Cambridge Arc Number CDP-2021-0124 By Fintan Codd, David Hirst, Adam Clark 12 July 2021 1 Background 2 2 Parliamentary material 7 3 Press material/Blog articles 8 4 Press notices 10 5 Further reading/websites 19 Oxford Cambridge Arc 1 Background About the Oxford-Cambridge Arc The area between Oxford and Cambridge, incorporating the ceremonial county areas of Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire forms a core spine that the government recognises as the Oxford-Cambridge Arc. The Oxford-Cambridge Arc is a globally significant place, home to world-leading technology clusters, two of the world’s leading universities. The economic prospectus for the Oxford-Cambridge Arc, published in October 2020, states that the area covered by the arc has 2 million jobs and generates over £111 billion of economic output per year.1 The prospectus promotes the region as a “highly successful, fast-growing and productive network of places”, that with additional investment would be enhanced further. In February 2021, the Government published its plan for developing “a spatial framework” for the Arc, including a timeline and how it will work with local partners. The plan cites studies suggesting large economic gains: Forecasts vary, but successive studies have found that there is a clear transformational opportunity. With the right interventions and investment, economic forecasts suggest that by 2050 we would see economic output growing by between £80.4 billion and £163 billion per annum, with between
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Two Limited
    High Speed Two Limited High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) High Speed Two Limited H igh Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD) March 2011 This r eport t akes i nto a ccount t he particular instructions and requirements of our client. It i s not i ntended f or a nd s hould n ot be relied u pon b y any third p arty a nd no responsibility i s u ndertaken to any t hird Ove Arup & Partners Ltd party The Arup Campus, Blythe Gate, Blythe Valley Park, Solihull, West Midlands. B90 8AE Tel +44 (0)121 213 3000 Fax +44 (0)121 213 3001 www.arup.com Job number High Speed Two (HS2) High Speed 2 Infrastructure Maintenance Depot Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The December 2009 Report 1 1.2 Layout of this Report 1 2 Scope of Work, Methodology and Deliverables 2 2.1 Scope of Work 2 2.2 Meeting 1 2 2.3 Intermediate instructions 3 2.4 Meeting 2 3 3 Current Rail Operations and Future Developments 4 3.1 Context 4 3.2 Oxford - Bletchley 4 3.3 Aylesbury – Claydon Line 4 3.4 High Speed 2 5 3.5 Evergreen 3 5 3.6 East West Project 5 4 Functional Requirements 6 5 Site Location Options 7 5.1 Introduction 7 5.2 Quadrant 1 9 5.3 Quadrant 2 11 5.4 Quadrant 3 15 5.5 Quadrant 4 17 5.6 Sites on HS2 (north) 18 6 Cost Estimates 20 6.1 Matrix table for all Site options 20 7 Conclusion 21 8 Selected Option Development 23 8.1 General layout 23 8.2 Specific site details 27 8.3 Site operation 28 8.4 West end connections 29 9 Calvert Waste Plant 30 9.1 Rail Access 30 9.2 Heat and power generation 32 10 Use of site as a potential construction depot 33
    [Show full text]
  • Haynes and Old Warden Local Area Transport Plan Including the Areas of Houghton Conquest, Moggerhanger, Northill, and Southill
    Appendix C Central Bedfordshire Local Transport Plan Haynes and Old Warden Local Area Transport Plan Including the areas of Houghton Conquest, Moggerhanger, Northill, and Southill 1 2 Contents 1. Background........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 What is the Local Area Transport Plan?.............................................................................. 5 1.2 What area does it cover?..................................................................................................... 5 1.3 How does it relate to the LTP itself?.................................................................................... 5 1.4 How is the LATP Structured? .............................................................................................. 6 2. Planning Context ............................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Overview of local areas ....................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Major Developments.......................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Development Strategy for Central Bedfordshire................................................................ 15 2.4 Collective impact of known development .......................................................................... 16 3. Local Studies ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Spatial Planning Officer Liaison Group Fifth Meeting – Tuesday, 05 May 2015, 9.30 Am Committee Room 3, City Hall, Queen’S Walk, London
    Strategic Spatial Planning Officer Liaison Group Fifth meeting – Tuesday, 05 May 2015, 9.30 am Committee Room 3, City Hall, Queen’s Walk, London Agenda 1 Apologies 2 Notes of 30 Jan 2015 meeting (Richard Linton, GLA) http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Action%20Notes.pdf 3 2015 London Plan (Richard Linton, GLA) and 2050 Infrastructure Plan published (Jeremy Skinner, GLA) http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/london-plan/further-alterations-to-the- london-plan http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/business-economy/vision-and-strategy/infrastructure- plan-2050 4 Review of LEP’s Strategic Economic Plans (Lee Searles) Final report herewith 5 Summit follow-up: Roundtable Discussion Note (John Lett, GLA) Views? – Roundtable Note plus Notes of Wider South East Summit herewith 6 Possible SSPOLG Work Programme (All) Potential items for discussion: 1) Towards consistent demographics (ONS / CLG 5 or 10 years / GLA Demographics) 2) Towards consistent employment projections (Oxford Economics / GLA / others?) 3) Productivity and skills – regional dimension 4) Transport infrastructure (2005 Commuter Study update / TfL Work Programme) and other e.g. digital infrastructure 5) Regional freight issues (road / rail / ports) 6) Local Economic Partnerships’ infrastructure asks – regional / sub-regional 7) What could ‘devolution’ mean for the wider South East? 8) Environment: water / waste / energy / climate change – regional dimension 9) Potential future geographies of growth 7 AOB / next meeting Working Group members Richard Linton GLA (Chair)
    [Show full text]
  • April 2021 Ref: Bank Holiday Working and Road/Footpath Closures Dear
    OFFICIAL Community Relations Square One 4 Travis Street Manchester M1 2NY T 03457 11 41 41 April 2021 Ref: Bank Holiday working and road/footpath closures Dear Neighbour, Upcoming works in Bletchley East West Rail Alliance would like to inform you of works which are taking place in Bletchley. Works will consist of lifting and placing the precast reinforced concrete bridge beams to support the two ends of Bletchley flyover using several cranes positioned in the compound adjacent to Water Eaton Road. These works are only permitted to be undertaken when the West Coast Main Line is closed due to the proximity to the operational railway. Works will be taking place 24hrs a day whilst the West Coast Main Line is closed over the May Bank Holiday. The dates are as followed Saturday 1st May to Tuesday 4th May. There will be staff on site before and after these start/end times, mobilising and demobilising plant and equipment. Contingency dates have also been arranged should they be required. These are as follows: • 8th May - 11:00pm to 6:00am • 5th May - 11:00pm to 06:00am • 22nd May - 11:00pm to 06:00am Buckingham Road closure Buckingham Road will be closed from Monday 7th June to Monday 19th July 2021. This is to enable the installation of concrete beams that will support the new flyover. Health and safety to the public and our workforce requires the road to be closed when the lifting crane is setup on both sides of the carriageway. Bus services will be diverted, a notice has been placed at Buckingham Road bus stop and Bletchley bus station.
    [Show full text]
  • East West Rail Bedford to Cambridge Route Option Consultation
    East West Rail Bedford to Cambridge Route Option Consultation RESPONSE FROM BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL March 2019 1 EAST WEST RAIL BEDFORD TO CAMBRIDGE ROUTE CONSULTATION RESPONSE FROM BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Final 11/3/19 Contents Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction and Purpose 5 2. Economic Impact of Route Options 6 3. Bedford Town Masterplan 9 4. Accessing Bedford 11 5. Enhancing National and International Connectivity Through Bedford Midland 13 6. Connectivity with HS2 16 7. Impact of Routes South of Bedford on Wixams 18 8. Route Engineering and Costs 20 9. Summary and Conclusions 21 List of Figures Figure 1 -Difference in GVA Between Bedford Midland Route and South of Bedford Route 7 Figure 2 - GVA Impact on Central Bedford 7 Figure 3 - GVA Impact of Future Service Developments 8 Figure 4 - Bedford Town Centre Masterplan 9 Figure 5 - Journey times in minutes from Cambridge to central Bedford locations 11 Figure 6 - Potential journey time benefits of interchange with EWR at Bedford Midland 14 Figure 7 - International connectivity through interchange at Bedford Midland 15 Figure 8 - Journey times modelled by Midlands Connect in Classic Compatible SOBC 16 Figure 9 - Journey time benefits through Bedford Midland with HS2 classic compatible services 17 Figure 10 - Location of Wixams Station 18 2 EAST WEST RAIL BEDFORD TO CAMBRIDGE ROUTE CONSULTATION RESPONSE FROM BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL Final 11/3/19 Executive Summary Bedford Borough Council (the Council) has always been a strong supporter of East West Rail (EWR). The Council’s strategy is to work positively with the EWR Company and others to maximise its economic benefits.
    [Show full text]