DOCSLIB.ORG

Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Page 1 West Anglia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Page 1 West Anglia Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Appendix1 West Anglia Mainline Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Broxbourne 4-tracking & CR2 to be given higher profile - Include CR2 on page 14 but Borough Council e.g. on pages 4 & 32 & in figure 2.2 on page not on pages 4 & 32 as 14. Include Ambition Broxbourne's aspiration these figures list existing of Cheshunt as strategic hub with CR2, links services and lines. Include to Stratford, London & Stansted, and reference to Ambition significant development around the station Broxbourne's aspiration of associated with a potential redevelopment of Cheshunt as strategic hub, Delamare Road. Include lobbying for early and of lobbying for early safeguarding of regional CR2 route. CR2 safeguarding of regional route. Cambridgeshire Include addressing single track tunnel at Single track tunnel at None. County Council Stansted to improve journey times & capacity Stansted as constraint for all services, from the north & south. already included in Strategy. East Herts District Objects to wording on page 41 re - HCC not pursuing Hertford Council investigation into the implementation of East as CR2 terminus and development around Hertford East branch so text will be removed. stations. Serious constraints of implementing Amend text on page 40 re CR2 in East Herts should be recognised. Ware platform. There was never a second platform at Ware (page 40). Hertford Town Appropriate service mix with more semi-fasts - Include reference to semi- Council to London, and longer term to Liverpool St. fasts including to Liverpool St. Hertfordshire Lobby for Hertford East & Harlow as northern HCC not pursuing Hertford None. County Council - termini. East as CR2 terminus as Cllr Cowan services would likely worsen in terms of journey time. Page 1 Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Hertfordshire LEP Early 4-tracking to Stansted in CP6 and 4-tracking included in the None. potentially CR2 longer term depending on Strategy already. capacity improvements from 4-tracking & timetable studies. Natural England Concern that 4-tracking for any distance may - Amend text to recognise be hard to achieve with significant potential impacts in pinchpoints, e.g. between Cheshunt & Hertfordshire as well as Bowyers Water which is a SSSI. benefits. Development would need to meet the Habitat Directive, provide adequate habitat compensation & requirements of the Lea Valley Park Authority. Radlett Society Improve connectivity to Stansted. - Cross-reference text in 'Access to international airports' section. Railfuture Improved connectivity for Hertfordshire at Whilst improved connectivity None. Stratford, through additional platform capacity to Stratford is highlighted in on High Meads Loop between Temple Mills the Strategy connectivity to East Jn and High Meads Jn for operational Stratford International resilience and new direct interchange at already exists via the DLR Stratford International with Southeastern and therefor an interchange Highspeed and DLR for services from/to with London Overground is Hertfordshire, and also dual use with London not seen as a priority. Overground as their platforms 1 and 2 cease to be sufficient for medium/long-term capacity/service frequency/train length. Stanstead Abbots Poor rolling stock, line capacity & Capacity/infrastructure are Add rolling stock as issue in Parish Council infrastructure. already captured under Hertford East branch issues & potential section. interventions. Page 2 Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Stevenage Borough Propose Stevenage as northern CR2 HCC not pursuing None. Council terminus with new link between Hertford Stevenage as CR2 terminus stations to improve connectivity, including as journey times to London potentially to Stansted with new Hertford East would be significantly longer branch chord. than for existing services and take up capacity for those existing services. Aspiration of east west connectivity referred to Transport Vision. Transport for Enhancements to Lea Valley route should Noted but outside the scope None. London include higher service frequency within of the Strategy. London. Individual Small-scale changes over long period; Timetable studies are being None. timetable changes and platform lengthening considered in the current should be considered in this period. Crossrail period and platform 2 to Stansted. Stansted to Braintree lengthening in the next reinstatement. control period (3 years away). Lead in times for rail schemes are long. Crossrail 2 to Stansted is not being considered by HCC and rail industry as journey times would be too slow to make viable. Braintree route outside scope of Strategy but will refer to Essex. Individual 4-tracking Coppermill to Broxbourne Junc’s Already included. None. Individual Extend CR2 to Harlow. Improve services to HCC and rail industry not Enhance Stratford in Stratford. considering CR2 to Harlow Strategy. as journey times to London would be too long. Page 3 Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Individual Line speed improvements north of Stansted HCC would support line Level crossing section to be to Cambridge; southern access improvements north of included in the Strategy. improvements to Stansted with potential Stansted if this did not affect tunnel doubling & passive provision for later services in the county but is Include reference to TfL reinstatement of Braintree route; level not a priority of the council. devolution of inners from crossing strategy to improve/remove; Doubling of tunnel included Cheshunt & aspiration to reinstatement of link between Hertford in the Strategy and HCC will improve frequency. stations and new Rye House chord to refer Braintree aspiration to facilitate connectivity from Hertford East Essex. Rye House chord Reference to extra platforms branch to Stansted. Improve frequency south already included and removed and Stratford as of Cheshunt to 4tph. Support for CR2 to relinking Hertford stations to alternative terminus Hertford East (4tph all day), to Harlow & be referred to The Transport clarified. Stansted (semi-fast) and some terminating at vision. Hertford East & Broxbourne (4tph) & 4-tracking to Broxbourne Stansted not being pursued Junction. Lengthen Liverpool Street platforms by HCC as CR2 termini. 4- but wait to CR2 timetable north of Cheshunt tracking already included in is confirmed before consider extra platforms, Strategy. with also the potential of Stratford as alternative terminus. Individual Old and unpleasant trains. Refer to Train facility None. section. Individual Train & platform lengthening at Liverpool St HCC has no view on costs Network Rail has a level very expensive. Remove level crossings. of schemes at Liverpool St. crossing removal programme and reference will be included in the Strategy for HCC's aspirations. Individual No Oyster machine at Kings Langley deters Refer to WCML. None. travel. Page 4 Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Individual Extend CR2 to Stansted, not Hertford East. HCC and rail industry not None. Linking Hertford East & Stansted would mean considering CR2 to Hertford less services to London. Prioritise capacity at East or Stansted. Hertford Broxbourne Junction and south to Cheshunt, East & Stansted link to be not at Ware. considered with 4-tracking capacity. Individual Suggests various recommendations for HCC has no view on Text to be included re TfL infrastructure/capacity improvements south of infrastructure improvements devolved inners and Bethnal Green to maximise capacity for suggested- only that aspirations for improved WAML services at Liverpool St. Improve capacity be improved. frequency and lengthening Cheshunt frequency to mayoral minimum of operating hours. recommendation of 4tph, potentially with 4th platform. Earlier services from Cheshunt to London and later services from London to Cheshunt to connect with underground services. Individual Improve bus links between Hertford stations; Refer safeguarding to Include bus connectivity in safeguard land for reinstating rail link. Transport Vision. Station facility section. Improve bus connectivity between stations & town centres. Individual Improve station facilities particularly parking & Refer to Station facility None. toilets. survey. Individual 4-tracking WAML to improve access to 4-tracking already included. None. Stansted. Individual Improved connectivity for Hertfordshire at Whilst improved connectivity None. Stratford, through additional platform capacity to Stratford is highlighted in on High Meads Loop between Temple East the Strategy connectivity to Jn and High Meads Jn- for operational Stratford International resilience and new direct interchange at already exists via the DLR Stratford International with Southeastern and therefor an interchange Highspeed and DLR for services from/to with London Overground is Hertfordshire, and also dual use with London not seen as a priority. Page 5 Responses to the Rail Strategy Consultation Organisation Consultation Comments - WAML HCC Response Action for Rail Strategy Overground as their platforms 1 and 2 cease to be sufficient for medium /long-term capacity/service frequency/train length. Individual Improve frequency at Theobalds Grove
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Watford Character of Area Study
    Character Area 18 Period Generally 1930s. Includes 1900s – 1950s. Heights Predominantly two storeys. Some bungalows. Urban grain Intermediate form. Block size / structure Regular pattern of blocks varying in size (450m x 80m). Generally larger block sub-division than Victorian/Edwardian development. Plot sizes Typically 8m x 40m. Gaps between buildings of 4m- 5m. Streetscene Suburban streetscene. Wide carriageways (6-7m for total), with pavements of 2.5-3.5m widths – some of which feature street trees. Limited street furniture. Building lines Generally consistent building lines behind front gardens. Front boundaries Marked by hedges of varying heights, brick walls or timber fences. Many original hedges / walls are now open frontages to allow car access. Roof forms Generally hipped tile roofs, with brick chimneys. Windows Originally metal or timber framed windows. These have generally been replaced since with various types of uPVC windows. Projecting two storey bay windows are common. Materials Materials include variety of brick types, render and mock-Tudor style timbering. Tile roofs. Car parking Large proportion of houses have garages as later additions to the side. Majority of parking is accommodated in front drives. Some on-street parking. Landscaping Front gardens typically 6m deep. Rear gardens typically 15m-25m deep. Hedges are relatively common in rear gardens, but less so in front gardens. Street tree planting along some pavements. Limited green space outside of gardens and formal parkland/playing fields/allotments. No grass verges between carriageways and pavements 103 Character Area 18A 104 Area 18A Summary This residential character area is located on the eastern side of the Borough, at the border with Hertsmere.
    [Show full text]
  • Watford Station Closure Panel
    Watford Station Closure Panel Document L Final Report, 28 08 2012 Author: Vincent Stops Final report of the consideration by London TravelWatch of the proposed closure and discontinuance of services to and from Watford station 1 Purpose of report 1.1 To set out the background and process undertaken as part of the consideration of the proposed closure and discontinuance of services to and from Watford station. 1.2 To summarise London Underground Limited’s (LUL’s) case for the closure, the concerns of passengers and the conclusions of Panel members consideration of the issues. 1.3 To report to the Mayor of London any hardship that would result from the closure, should it proceed. 1.4 To report to the Mayor of London measures that would alleviate hardship resulting from the closure, should it proceed. 1.5 To report any other conclusions from London TravelWatch’s consideration of the closure. 2 Background 2.1 Watford station is one of the northern terminal stations on the Metropolitan line. There is a long-standing aspiration to divert the Metropolitan line, via the former Croxley Green branch line, to terminate at Watford Junction station. This would entail a short section of new railway being built to connect the Metropolitan line to the former Croxley Green branch line. The Link would have two new accessible stations at Ascot Road and Vicarage Road and connect to Watford Junction station via Watford High Street station. The project is known as the Croxley Rail Link. See Appendices A & B below for schematics of the existing and proposed Metropolitan line.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Herts Economy Study
    South West Hertfordshire Economic Study A Final Report by Regeneris Consulting and GL Hearn South West Hertfordshire Councils South West Hertfordshire Economic Study February 2016 Regeneris Consulting Ltd www.regeneris.co.uk South West Hertfordshire Economic Study Contents Page Executive Summary i Purpose of the Study and Approach i Functional Economic Market Area (FEMA) i Policy Context ii Economic Baseline ii Market Assessment iii Growth Scenarios iv 1. Introduction and Purpose of Study 1 2. Defining the Functional Economic Area 4 Housing Market Area 6 Local Enterprise Partnership Geographies 9 Flow of Goods, Services and Information 13 Service Market for Consumers 16 Cultural and Social Well-Being Catchments 19 Transport Network 21 Future Considerations 22 The FEMA of South West Herts 24 3. Policy Context 27 4. The South West Herts Economy: An Overview 37 Size of the South West Herts Economy 37 Geography of the South-West Hertfordshire Economy 39 Recent Economic Performance 41 Labour Market 44 Broad Sectoral Composition 46 Sector Strengths 49 Structure of Business Base 57 Enterprise 60 5. Commercial Property Market Assessment 63 South West Hertfordshire Economic Study National Economic Conditions 63 Office Market Review 63 Industrial Sector Review 71 Commercial Agents Consultations 76 Summary 78 6. Future Growth Scenarios 80 Higher Growth Scenario 102 Conclusions on Preferred Scenario 108 7. Relationship with London 111 Introduction 111 Migration 112 8. Supply of Employment Land 120 Introduction 120 Site Assessment Methodology 120 Sites in Dacorum 122 Sites in Hertsmere 124 Sites in St Albans 141 Sites in Three Rivers 145 Sites in Watford 151 Conclusion 158 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Area Appraisal October 2020
    London Borough of Waltham Forest Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal October 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Maria Medlycott, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 15/10/2020 Reviser(s): Tim Murphy Date of last revision: 23/11/2020 Date Printed: 23/11/2020 Version: 2 Status: Final 2 Contents 1 Acknowledgments and Copyright ................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 3 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 8 4 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers ................................................................................ 10 5 History of Waltham Forest Borough ............................................................................. 13 6 Archaeological Priority Areas in Waltham Forest.......................................................... 31 6.1 Tier 1 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.2 Tier 2 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 31 6.3 Tier 3 APAs Size (Ha.) .......................................................................................... 32 6.4 Waltham Forest APA 1.1. Queen Elizabeth Hunting Lodge GV II* .................... 37 6.5 Waltham Forest APA 1.2: Water House ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Spatial Planning Officer Liaison Group Fifth Meeting – Tuesday, 05 May 2015, 9.30 Am Committee Room 3, City Hall, Queen’S Walk, London
    Strategic Spatial Planning Officer Liaison Group Fifth meeting – Tuesday, 05 May 2015, 9.30 am Committee Room 3, City Hall, Queen’s Walk, London Agenda 1 Apologies 2 Notes of 30 Jan 2015 meeting (Richard Linton, GLA) http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Action%20Notes.pdf 3 2015 London Plan (Richard Linton, GLA) and 2050 Infrastructure Plan published (Jeremy Skinner, GLA) http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/planning/london-plan/further-alterations-to-the- london-plan http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/business-economy/vision-and-strategy/infrastructure- plan-2050 4 Review of LEP’s Strategic Economic Plans (Lee Searles) Final report herewith 5 Summit follow-up: Roundtable Discussion Note (John Lett, GLA) Views? – Roundtable Note plus Notes of Wider South East Summit herewith 6 Possible SSPOLG Work Programme (All) Potential items for discussion: 1) Towards consistent demographics (ONS / CLG 5 or 10 years / GLA Demographics) 2) Towards consistent employment projections (Oxford Economics / GLA / others?) 3) Productivity and skills – regional dimension 4) Transport infrastructure (2005 Commuter Study update / TfL Work Programme) and other e.g. digital infrastructure 5) Regional freight issues (road / rail / ports) 6) Local Economic Partnerships’ infrastructure asks – regional / sub-regional 7) What could ‘devolution’ mean for the wider South East? 8) Environment: water / waste / energy / climate change – regional dimension 9) Potential future geographies of growth 7 AOB / next meeting Working Group members Richard Linton GLA (Chair)
    [Show full text]
  • INFR Oct 2019 COMET LP4 SADC Analysis V4 Final
    Hertfordshire COMET: 2036 Local Plan Run 4. St Albans District Council Output Analysis FINAL DRAFT Project number: 60588905 October 2019 Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by CW, PGN, TTS CW SK Revision History Revision Revision date Approved by v1 – Draft for client comment 10 April 2019 In draft V2 – Draft with extra journey time analysis 24 April 2019 In draft V3 – Final with client comments addressed 14 October 2019 CW FINAL DRAFT 2 AECOM Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Prepared for: Hertfordshire County Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited AECOM House 63-77 Victoria Street St Albans Hertfordshire AL1 3ER United Kingdom T: +44(0)1727 535000 aecom.com FINAL DRAFT © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. 3 AECOM Hertfordshire COMET: Local Plan Forecasting Report Project number: 60555331 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unitarian Gothic: Rebuilding in Hackney in 1858 Alan Ruston 20
    istory• ,, VOLUME ONE In this issue - Pepys and Hackney: how Samuel and Elisabeth Pepys visited Hackney for rest and recreation - two ( or one and the same?) Homerton gardens visited by Pepys and Evelyn - The Tyssen family, Lords of the manor in Hackney since the 17th century-how Victorian nonconformists went shop­ ping for 'off the peg' church architecture- silk manufactur­ ers, the mentally afflicted, and Victorian orphans at Hackney Wick-the post-war development ofhigh-rise housing across the borough ... Hackney History is the new annual volume ofthe Friends of Hackney Archives. The Friends were founded in 1985 to act as a focus for local history in Hackney, and to support the work ofHackney Archives Department. As well as the annual volume they receive the Department's regular newsletter, The Hackney Terrier, and are invited to participate in visits, walks and an annual lecture. Hackney History is issued free ofcharge to subscribers to the Friends. In 1995 membership is£6 for the calendar year. For further details, please telephone O171 241 2886. ISSN 1360 3795 £3.00 'r.,,. free to subscribers HACKNEY History volume one About this publication 2 Abbreviations used 2 Pepys and Hackney Richard Luckett 3 The Mystery of Two Hackney Gardens Mike Gray 10 The Tyssens: Lords of Hackney Tim Baker 15 Unitarian Gothic: Rebuilding in Hackney in 1858 Alan Ruston 20 A House at Hackney Wick Isobel Watson 25 The Rise of the High-Rise: Housing in Post-War Hackney Peter Foynes 29 Contributors to this issue 36 Acknowledgements 36 THE FRIENDS OF HACKNEY ARCHIVES 1995 About this publication Hackney History is published by the Friends of Hackney Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Hackney Marshes & Adjacent Green Spaces
    Electricity Generating Station on east bank of Lea was built MAP SERIES OF WALKS Wick Woodland is at a lower level from the rest of Hackney in 1901. It used coal brought by barge and stored on the Marshes because no materials were dumped on it after Marshes. Most of the power station and its tall chimney were CONNECTING HACKNEY’S World War II. It is edged with mature trees: plane trees demolished in 1970, and is now Hackney Cleansing Depot. In alongside the canal; black poplar and ash along Homerton front of it a path connects Cow Bridge with Millfields. Road. Football was played here until the late 1980s. In the Middlesex Filter Beds. The water powered mills from C14 PARKS & OPEN SPACES mid-1990s it was planted with native trees, including black to C19. In C19 became Filter Beds to provide clean and safe poplar. It is now home to a variety of birds and plants and is water for East London. After the plant at Coppermills was managed with the help of the local community. opened in 1970s, the Beds became a nature reserve: open Arena Field (owned by the Olympic Delivery Authority since daily, but times may vary through the year. 2007) lies at the southern end of Hackney Marshes. Trees and bushes near the Lea Navigation Canal were home to Hackney Marshes came into public ownership at the end of many birds, including house sparrows. The Channel Tunnel C19 when many of the mature trees were planted – planes, Rail Link between Stratford and Kings Cross runs under its ash, and native black poplars (the largest collection in London southern end.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Report by Sawtag Opposing
    A REPORT BY SAWTAG OPPOSING THE CLOSURE OF WATFORD METROPOLITAN STATION AND ITS ASSOCIATED ROUTE. ALL OF THESE ARE TO BE SAFEGUARDED UNDER EXTRACTED GOVERNMENT POLICY. This report opposes the closure of Watford (Metropolitan Line) Station on three major grounds. 1 Retaining peak, football and special traffic, and positively building up traffic. Both the Metropolitan Line and WCML/Watford Suburban Lines serve nearby Wembley Stadium extremely well already. Also, train portion working must be advanced to best practice elsewhere. 2 Facilitating the forming of an extended London Overground network, through the extracted Government Policy of better protection, critical in developing rail infrastructure and interchange. 3 Essential safeguards are to be put in place to protect the truncated alignment through Watford (Metropolitan Line) Station. Firstly , it is essential the latter station is retained at least for continued peak hours services, in view of the steadily increasing peak and general use of both the London Metropolitan Underground and Network Rail West Coast Main Line centered system. Safeguarding is also essential in order to serve during the interim for Watford Football Club traffic attending the Vicarage Road Stadium. Pending the establishment of a new station; immediately South of the Stadium on the new Croxley Link Line; Watford (Met) Station is to be kept open for both peak and Football traffic with requisite direct connecting buses. These connecting buses will run from a retained Watford Metropolitan Station direct to the Stadium. There was a railway triangle immediately South of the Stadium, and Croxley Moor alternatives (reference no. 8) to the Croxley Link Project; investigated both linking the Rickmansworth LNWR branch corridor west to the Rickmansworth (Met) Main Line towards Aylesbury, and generally reinstating the pre-Beeching railway triangle inter alia.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Plaza Area Development Options
    Broxbourne Local Plan Park Plaza Area Planning Policy Team Development Options April 2016 1 Contents Development Options Reports 1. Purpose of this report pg 2 Purpose of this report In preparing its new Local Plan the Council has considered a 2. The Park Plaza Area pg 3 number of Borough-wide options as set out in the Development Introduction to the Park Plaza area Options and Scenarios Report (April 2016). The Council has History and settlement pattern prepared five local area options studies in order to assess Previous local plans development potential in more detail. These studies have informed 3. Issues to consider for future development pg 7 the Borough-Wide Options and Scenarios Report and all six studies Landscape and character should be read together in order to understand the development Visual appraisal of the Park Plaza area strategy for the emerging Local Plan. Environmental designations In addition to this study for Park Plaza, Development Options Roads and rights of way Reports have been prepared for Bury Green, Brookfield, Goffs Public transport Oak, and West of Wormley. A further study had been proposed Facilities and utilities for West of Hoddesdon but this was overtaken by the granting of Employment evidence planning permission for strategic scale development at High Leigh in Protecting the green belt April 2015. Landownership and promotions 4. Development options pg 21 This report sets out and discusses potential development options for the area. Although the report concludes on the performance of 5. Green Belt Boundaries pg 37 each option within the area’s local context, it will be the Local Plan which decides on the preferred option in the context of overall 6.
    [Show full text]