DOCSLIB.ORG

Kartierung Der Xylobiontenfauna in Totholzbeständen Im Nationalpark Gesäuse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kartierung Der Xylobiontenfauna in Totholzbeständen Im Nationalpark Gesäuse ÖKOTEAM Institut für Tierökologie und Naturraumplanung OG Bergmanngasse 22 · A-8010 Graz · Tel ++43 316 / 35 16 50 E-Mail [email protected] · Internet www.oekoteam.at Kartierung der Xylobiontenfauna in Totholzbeständen im Nationalpark Gesäuse Endbericht Graz, im Dezember 2017 Xylobiontenfauna im Nationalpark Gesäuse 2017 – Endbericht Auftraggeber Nationalpark Gesäuse GmbH Weng 2, 8913 Admont Auftragnehmer ÖKOTEAM - Institut für Tierökologie und Naturraumplanung OG Bergmanngasse 22 · A-8010 Graz · Tel ++43 316 / 35 16 50 E-Mail [email protected] · Internet www.oekoteam.at Bearbeiter/innen-Team Institutionen BearbeiterInnen ÖKOTEAM – Projektleitung, Bericht, Bearbeitung Zikaden Institut für Tierökologie und Naturraumpla- PD Dr. Werner E. Holzinger nung Assistenz Projektleitung, Bericht, Bearbeitung Wanzen Dr. Thomas Frieß Bearbeitung Wanzen Dr. Carsten Morkel Kartographie, Modellierung, Bericht Mag. Philipp Zimmermann Bearbeitung xylobionte Käfer E. Holzer, Mag. Peter Mehlmauer, Sandra Aurenhammer MSc. Bearbeitung Begleitfauna Dr. Thomas Frieß, PD Dr. Werner E. Holzinger, Mag. Brigitte Komposch Freilandarbeit Mag. Peter Mehlmauer, Sandra Aurenhammer MSc., Mag. Lydia Schlosser, Rachel Korn, MSc., Harald Ellinger, Mag. Harald Komposch, Dr. Thomas Frieß, Helge Heimburg, BSc., Dr. Carsten Morkel Lektorat Astrid Leitner, Mag. MSc. Daniel Kreiner Für Korrekturvorschläge und wertvolle fachliche Anregungen danken die Bearbeiter Herrn Mag. MSc. Daniel Kreiner von der Natio- nalpark Gesäuse GmbH. Umschlaggrafik & Grafik: P. Zimmermann / ÖKOTEAM Copyright Fotos: Alle Fotos in diesem Bericht stammen vom ÖKOTEAM und beauftragten MitarbeiterInnen, außer wenn anders vermerkt Seite 2 Xylobiontenfauna im Nationalpark Gesäuse 2017 – Endbericht Inhalt 1. Kurzzusammenfassung ............................................................................................................................. 5 2. Short summary .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Ausgangssituation ..................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Fragestellung und Projektziele .................................................................................................................. 8 5. Zoologische Indikatoren ............................................................................................................................ 9 5.1. Xylobionte Käfer (Coleoptera part.) ................................................................................................... 9 5.2. Rindenwanzen (Aradidae) ................................................................................................................ 10 6. Material und Methoden ............................................................................................................................ 12 6.1. Untersuchungsgebiet ....................................................................................................................... 12 6.1.1. Standort-Auswahl Fensterfallen ................................................................................................ 13 6.1.2. Standort-Auswahl Wanzensuche .............................................................................................. 20 6.2. Erhebungsmethoden ........................................................................................................................ 25 6.2.1. Käfer .......................................................................................................................................... 25 6.2.2. Wanzen ..................................................................................................................................... 30 6.3. Verwendete Habitatparameter ......................................................................................................... 33 6.4. Determination und Nomenklatur ...................................................................................................... 33 6.4.1. Käfer .......................................................................................................................................... 33 6.4.2. Wanzen ..................................................................................................................................... 33 6.5. Naturschutzfachliche Bewertung der Käferzönosen ........................................................................ 33 6.6. Verbreitungsmodellierung der Lebensräume xylobionter Käfer ....................................................... 35 7. Ergebnisse ............................................................................................................................................... 37 7.1. Xylobionte Käfer ............................................................................................................................... 37 7.1.1. Liste der nachgewiesenen Arten .............................................................................................. 38 7.1.2. Statistische Übersicht ............................................................................................................... 49 7.1.3. Bemerkenswerte Käfernachweise ............................................................................................ 55 7.1.4. Steckbriefe ausgewählter, forstlich relevanter Arten ................................................................ 61 7.1.5. Naturschutzfachliche Bewertung der Standorte ....................................................................... 68 7.1.6. Vergleich der xylobionten Käferfauna mit anderen Wald-Schutzgebieten ............................... 74 7.2. Rindenwanzen (Heteroptera) ........................................................................................................... 77 7.2.1. Arteninventar ............................................................................................................................. 77 7.2.2. Charakterisierung der Arten ...................................................................................................... 80 7.2.3. Rindenwanzen als Charakter- und Zielarten der Waldbiotope im Nationalpark Gesäuse ....... 91 7.3. Zikaden (Auchenorrhyncha) ............................................................................................................. 93 7.4. Sonstige Tierbeobachtungen ........................................................................................................... 96 7.4.1. Kollars Höhlenschrecke (Troglophilus cavicola) ....................................................................... 96 Seite 3 Xylobiontenfauna im Nationalpark Gesäuse 2017 – Endbericht 7.4.2. Zwergfledermaus (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) ............................................................................... 96 7.5. Ergebnisse der Modellierungen ....................................................................................................... 97 8. Übertragbare Ergebnisse für den Wirtschaftswald – Faktor Totholz .................................................... 103 9. Resümee und Empfehlungen für ein zukünftiges Management ........................................................... 105 10. Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................................................ 107 11. Zitierte und weiterführende Literatur .................................................................................................. 108 12. Anhang: Fotodokumentation der Standorte ....................................................................................... 117 Seite 4 Xylobiontenfauna im Nationalpark Gesäuse 2017 – Endbericht 1. Kurzzusammenfassung Projektziele sind die Erhebung holzbewohnender Käfer und Wanzen im Nationalpark und die Identifikation besonders wertvoller Wälder. Es wurden 1.553 Käferindividuen aus 231 Arten gesammelt. 179 Arten sind xylobiont. Im Mittel wurden pro Standort 15-30 Arten nachgewiesen. Besonders artenreich sind die südex- ponierten Laubmischwälder nördlich der Enns. Acht Rindenwanzen-Arten wurden nachgewiesen. Sie sind an größere Totholzvolumina gebunden. Empfohlen wird, Totholz aller Baumarten jeglicher Dimension unberührt auf den Flächen zu belassen. 2. Short summary We studied saproxylic beetle and Aradidae bug species in the National Park and identified the most impor- tant forests for biodiversity conservation. Using window traps on 30 sites, we collected 1553 beetles from 231 species (Ø 15-30 species/site). Decidous forests north of the Enns river showed the highest species diversity. We found 8 aradid bugs. Their presence is dependant upon higher amounts of deadwood. To further en- hance biodiversity, we recommend to leave any dead wood (also after catastrophic events) untouched. Seite 5 Xylobiontenfauna im Nationalpark Gesäuse 2017 – Endbericht 3. Ausgangssituation Im Nationalpark Gesäuse nehmen Waldlebensräume rund 50 % der Gesamtfläche ein und sind damit ein Hauptlebensraum für die Nationalpark-Diversität. Die Artenvielfalt in Wäldern hängt stark vom Alter der Waldbestände ab: Da etwa die Hälfte aller Waldarten an Totholz gebunden ist, steigt die Artenvielfalt in der Regel mit dem Alter des Bestandes und damit dem Totholzanteil an. Während in Wirtschaftswäldern Bäu- me zur Holznutzung im Alter von 60 bis 150 Jahren gefällt werden, beträgt die natürliche „Lebensdauer“ eines Baumbestandes, je nach Standort und Baumart, mehrere bis viele
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abhnadlungen Aus Dem Westfälischen Museum Für
    LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde 86. Band · 2017 Beiträge zur Entomofauna Nordrhein-Westfalens (Insecta: Coleoptera, Saltatoria) Karsten Hannig (Hrsg.) LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Westfälisches Landesmuseum mit Planetarium Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe Münster 2017 ISBN 978-3-940726-50-6 ISSN 0175-3495 Hinweise für Autoren In den Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde werden natur- wissenschaftliche Beiträge veröffentlicht, die den Raum Westfalen und angrenzende Regionen betreffen. Die Autoren werden gebeten, Manuskripte als WORD-Dokument per mail oder auf CD an das LWL-Museum für Naturkunde zu senden: Schriftleitung „Abhandlungen“ Dr. Bernd Tenbergen LWL-Museum für Naturkunde Sentruper Straße 285 48161 Münster [email protected] Das Manuskript sollte folgenden Aufbau haben: Überschrift, darunter Name (ausge- schrieben) und Wohnort des Autors, Inhaltsverzeichnis, kurze Zusammenfassung in deutscher und ggf. englischer Sprache, klar gegliederter Hauptteil, Literaturverzeichnis (Autoren alphabetisch geordnet), Anschrift des Verfassers. Lateinische Art- und Gattungs- namen sind kursiv zu schreiben. Alle Autorennamen im Text sowie im Literaturverzeichnis sind in Kapitälchen (z. B. RUNGE, F. (1976)) zu schreiben. Alle Tabellen und Abbildungen (Karten, Zeichnungen, Fotos) müssen eine Verkleinerung auf Satzspiegelgröße (12,6 x 19,8 cm) zulassen. Sie sollten als druckfertige pdf- und/oder Bild-Dateien eingereicht werden. Alle Abbildungen und Tabellen sind zusammen mit den Bildunterschriften bzw. Tabellenüberschriften nicht nur im Text eingebunden, sonderen auch als gesonderte Datei beizufügen. Fotos sind möglichst digital (Auflösung 300 dpi) oder in schwarzweißen Hochglanzab- zügen vorzulegen. Bei Farbaufnahmen sollte darauf geachtet werden, dass diese in der Regel schwarzweiß gedruckt werden. Das Literaturverzeichnis ist nach folgendem Muster anzufertigen: IMMEL, W.
    [Show full text]
  • World Catalog of Fossil Cantharidae
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317166287 World catalog of fossil Cantharidae Article · May 2017 CITATIONS READS 2 362 1 author: Fabrizio Fanti 36 PUBLICATIONS 86 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Studies of the world fossil Soldier Beetles (Cantharidae) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Fabrizio Fanti on 26 May 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Gruppo Umbro Mineralogico Paleontogico Special Issue World catalog of fossil Cantharidae N° 2/2017 Fossils & minerals index World Catalog of foSSIl CantharIdaE Fabrizio FANTI Pag 1 Cover: Cantharidae. Amber. Photo courtesy of Artur R. Michalski Editorial Boarding Chief: Boccali Roldano Balocchi Pamela Calzolari Prospero Famiani Federico Giorgi Maria Pia Nessi Enrico Partenzi Chiara Sensi Claudio Tassi Luca Scientific commitee: Bogni Giorgio Venturi Federico Biagini Publio Carlini Rossano Tipography : Tipolito Properzio Adresse : Via dei Carrettieri, 12 - 06081 Località: Santa Maria degli Angeli - ASSISI - PERUGIA Italia Authorization No. 17 of 2 November 2016 - Court of Perugia Fossils & minerals World Catalog of foSSIl CantharIdaE Fabrizio FANTI [email protected] abstract acknowledgements A catalogue and bibliography of the world fossil Cantharidae are I am grateful to: Susana Adamonis and Cecilia Soledad given. Rhagonycha germari (Heer, 1847) n. comb., Rhagonycha Cataldo (Buenos Aires University), Vitalii I. Alekseev, Clive tertiaria (Heer, 1847) n. comb. and Rhagonycha hesperus A. Auton, Gabriel Biffi (Brazil), Albertas Bitinas (Klaipėda (Wickham, 1914) n. comb. are transferred from Telephorus University - Lithuania), Guido Bonamie (Merendree - Belgium), Schaeffer, 1766 = Cantharis Linnaeus, 1758 to Rhagonycha Jan Bosselaers, Christopher J.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Distance to Urban Areas on Saproxylic Beetles in Urban Forests
    Effect of distance to urban areas on saproxylic beetles in urban forests Effekt av avstånd till bebyggda områden på vedlevande skalbaggar i urbana skogsområden Jeffery D Marker Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Biology: Ecology and Conservation Biology Master’s thesis, 30 hp Supervisor: Denis Lafage Examiner: Larry Greenberg 2019-01-29 Series number: 19:07 2 Abstract Urban forests play key roles in animal and plant biodiversity and provide important ecosystem services. Habitat fragmentation and expanding urbanization threaten biodiversity in and around urban areas. Saproxylic beetles can act as bioindicators of forest health and their diversity may help to explain and define urban-forest edge effects. I explored the relationship between saproxylic beetle diversity and distance to an urban area along nine transects in the Västra Götaland region of Sweden. Specifically, the relationships between abundance and species richness and distance from the urban- forest boundary, forest age, forest volume, and tree species ratio was investigated Unbaited flight interception traps were set at intervals of 0, 250, and 500 meters from an urban-forest boundary to measure beetle abundance and richness. A total of 4182 saproxylic beetles representing 179 species were captured over two months. Distance from the urban forest boundary showed little overall effect on abundance suggesting urban proximity does not affect saproxylic beetle abundance. There was an effect on species richness, with saproxylic species richness greater closer to the urban-forest boundary. Forest volume had a very small positive effect on both abundance and species richness likely due to a limited change in volume along each transect. An increase in the occurrence of deciduous tree species proved to be an important factor driving saproxylic beetle abundance moving closer to the urban-forest.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) Como Suporte À Bioindicação De Alterações Ambientais Na Península Ibérica
    PhD 3.º CICLO FCUP 2015 Península Ibérica Península na ambientais alterações de bioindicação à suporte como Cantharidae) (Coleoptera, 1830 Eschscholtz, género do biogeografia e Sistemática Sistemática e biogeografia do género Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830 (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) Rhagonycha como suporte à bioindicação de alterações ambientais na Península Ibérica da Silva da Manuel Grosso Ferreira José José Manuel Grosso Ferreira da Silva Tese de Doutoramento apresentada à Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto Biologia 2015 Sistemática e biogeografia do género Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830 (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) como suporte à bioindicação de alterações ambientais na Península Ibérica José Manuel Grosso Ferreira da Silva Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Departamento de Biologia 2015 Orientador Prof. Doutor Rubim Manuel Almeida da Silva, Professor Auxiliar, ( Dep. Biologia) FCUP Coorientador Doutor Miguel Ángel Alonso Zarazaga, Investigador Titular, CSIC Prefácio Os artigos listados seguidamente foram elaborados durante o desenvolvimento da presente tese, em colaboração com os respetivos co-autores. O candidato declara que participou em todas as etapas de conceção e elaboração destas publicações e que liderou a redação de todos os artigos. 2009 GROSSO-SILVA, J. M. & DIAMANTINO, J. L., 2009. New and interesting beetle (Coleoptera) records from Portugal (6th note). Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa , 45 : 279-280. GROSSO-SILVA, J. M. & SOARES-VIEIRA, P., 2009. A preliminary list of the Coleoptera and Hemiptera of the Gaia Biological Park (northern Portugal), with comments on some species. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa , 44 : 541-544. GROSSO-SILVA, J. M. & SOARES-VIEIRA, P., 2009. Coleoptera and Hemiptera of the Gaia Biological Park (northern Portugal) (2nd note): Additions to the list and new distribution data, with comments on some species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Beetles of Great Britain
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR134 A review of the beetles of Great Britain The Soldier Beetles and their allies Species Status No.16 First published 20 January 2014 www.gov.uk/natural-england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background Making good decisions to conserve species should primarily be based upon an objective process of determining the degree of threat to the survival of a species. The recognised international approach to undertaking this is by assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat categories. This report was commissioned to update the threat status of beetles from the named families from work originally undertaken in 1987, 1992 and 1994 respectively using the IUCN methodology for assessing threat. It is expected that further invertebrate status reviews will follow. Natural England Project Manager - Jon Webb, [email protected] Contractor - Buglife (project management), K.N.A. Alexander (author) Keywords - beetles, invertebrates, red list (iucn), status reviews Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England website: www.naturalengland.org.uk. For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0845 600 3078 or e-mail [email protected]. This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • BHS Guidelines for Site Selection May 2018
    These Guidelines have been subject to revision since their original publication. The pages covering the revised sections have been inserted into this document. Lancashire County Heritage Sites Scheme Biological Heritage Sites Guidelines for Site Selection Errata Page Guideline Error 34 Po1 Entries in Table 4. For U and V have been swapped (V appears before U). 43 Ff3 Add: Stellaria palustris Marsh Stitchwort 44 Ff3 Persicaria minor Small Water-pepper should read: Persicaria minor Small Water-pepper 44 Ff3 Plantanthera bifolia Lesser Butterfly-orchid should read: Plantanthera bifolia Lesser Butterfly-orchid 45 Ff4(a) Rhinanthus minor ssp. stenophyllusa Yellow-rattle should read: Rhinanthus minor ssp. stenophyllus a Yellow-rattle 46 Ff4b Polstichum setiferum should read Polystichum setiferum 51 Li6 The species listed under Application should form part of the Guideline. The Application text should read “All sites with six or more of the species listed above recorded since 1987 should be included.“ 60 Ma3 Delete the first sentence of the Justification which refers to water vole. 70 Am1a Guideline should read “...”good” or “exceptional” population...”. 71 Am2 Application reads: “...amphibians not included in (see Guideline Am1a or Am1b), as defined in Table 7.” Should read: “...amphibians (not included in Guideline Am1a or Am1b), as defined in Table 7.” 80 Mo4 Zenobiella Subrufescens now Perforatella subrufescens 82 In2 Add Hydroporus longicornis. 22/1/01 Lancashire County Heritage Sites Scheme Biological Heritage Sites Guidelines for Site
    [Show full text]
  • EDINBVRGH* Report No the CITY of EDINBURGH COUNCIL
    Item no *EDINBVRGH* Report no THE CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL Edinburgh Local Biodiversity Action Plan Phase 3 2010-2015 Planning Committee 3 December 2009 1 Purpose of report 1.1 To report to Committee on the review of the Edinburgh Local Biodiversity Action Plan, and seek approval for the resulting Edinburgh Local Biodiversity ' Action Plan Phase 3, 2010-2015. 2 Summary 2.1 The Council has a duty to further the conservation of biodiversity under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004. This is achieved through the Edinburgh Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP). Production of the Edinburgh LBAP is a key action in the Edinburgh Partnership Single Outcome Agreement 2009-2012. The current Edinburgh LBAP details action taken for the period 2004-2009. Over the last six months the Edinburgh Biodiversity Partnership has reviewed achievements from this phase of the LBAP, and outlined the work required for the next five year phase. This work is now complete and the appended document details the action to be taken for 201 0-2015. 2.2 A number of actions within Phase 3 of the plan will be the responsibility of Services for Communities. Therefore it is recommended that the report is referred to the Transport, Infrastructure and Environment Committee for information. 3 Main report 3.1 The Edinburgh LBAP was launched in March 2000 as a new initiative to conserve and enhance Edinburgh's natural heritage. The plan was prepared by a partnership of many organisations actively engaged in the conservation of natural heritage. It put forward an ambitious programme of actions to: conserve and enhance natural habitats within the city; address the decline in biodiversity, particularly of priority species; raise awareness of biodiversity issues in the public consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Habitat Manipulation and Semiochemicals to Enhance Pest Control in Apple Orchards
    Attract, reward and disrupt: combining habitat manipulation and semiochemicals to enhance pest control in apple orchards Joakim Pålsson Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Crop Production Science Department of Plant Protection Biology Alnarp Doctoral thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp 2019 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2019:48 Cover: Sown flower strip in apple orchard (left), Anthocoris nemorum feeding on an aphid, Chrysoperla carnea resting within a flower strip (centre) and apple bean intercropping (right). (photo: Joakim Pålsson and Marco Tasin) ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN (print version) 978-91-7760-414-3 ISBN (electronic version) 978-91-7760-415-0 © 2019 Joakim Pålsson, Alnarp Print: SLU Service/Repro, Alnarp 2019 Attract, reward and disrupt: combining habitat manipulation and semiochemicals to enhance pest control in apple orchards Abstract Agricultural intensification entails negative effects on natural enemy populations and the pest regulation services they provide. Habitat manipulation holds potential to control pests with less negative effects on the environment than conventional methods. This can be achieved by the establishment of non-crop vegetation to support natural enemies and disfavour pests. Synthetic semiochemicals possess the capability of affecting arthropods behaviour and can be combined with habitat manipulation to increase pest control. In this thesis I examine how biological control is affected in high (conventional) and low (organic) intensity apple production systems and how habitat manipulation with and without semiochemicals can be used to enhance biological pest control. The intensity of management had a strong effect on the natural enemy community and their pest control potential. Organic apple orchards were able to support a higher number and diversity of natural enemies and presented a higher suppression of sentinel Dysaphis plantaginea colonies than integrated pest management orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • Broads Biodiversity Audit Appendixx
    October 2011 Biodiversity Audit and Tolerance Sensitivity Mapping for the Broads Appendices to final report The study is a Broads Authority initiative, undertaken by the University of East Anglia, supported by Natural England and working with the conservation organisations in the Broads area. Project Manager: Andrea Kelly (Broads Authority) Steering group: Andrea Kelly (Broads Authority) Erica Murray (Broads Authority) Dorothy Casey (Suffolk Wildlife Trust) Martin Horlock (Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service) Phil Pearson (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) Scott Perkin (Norfolk Biodiversity Partnership) Martin Sanford (Suffolk Biological Records Centre) Hannah Wallace (Natural England) Stuart Warrington (National Trust) Authors: Christopher J Panter Hannah L Mossman Paul M Dolman Published by: School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK Citation: C. J. Panter, H. L. Mossman, P. M. Dolman (2011) Biodiversity Audit and Tolerance Sensitivity Mapping for The Broads. Broads Authority, Norwich ISBN: 978-0-9567812-0-9 © Copyright rests with the Broads Authority. Acknowledgements: We thank the steering group for the advice, guidance and support during this work. We are indebted to the large number of individuals who contributed biological records and ecological information to the Broads Biodiversity Audit, without which the work would not be possible. Furthermore, we acknowledge the amazing contribution of thousands of individual additional recorders and members of the public who have submitted
    [Show full text]
  • Faunistic Diversity of the City of Plovdiv(Bulgaria), Volume 1 – Invertebrates
    Bulletin of the Natural History Museum - Plovdiv Supplement 1 2018 Faunistic diversity of the city of Plovdiv (Bulgaria), Volume 1 – Invertebrates Ivelin Mollov, Dilian Georgiev, Ognyan Todorov (Editors) REGIONAL NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii Online ISBN: 978-619-202-462-8 (http://rnhm.org/en/jurnal/index/24) Print ISBN: 978-619-202-461-1 Bulletin of the Natural History Museum – Plovdiv“ (Bull. Nat. Hist. Mus. Plovdiv) is the official scientific bulletin of the Natural History Museum – Plovdiv, published by Plovdiv University Press. The journal accepts submissions of original studies in the field of paleontology, natural history, geology and speleology, zoology, botany, ecology, biogeography, museology, history of natural studies, information about museum collections, etc. The official language of the journal is English. Exceptions are possible, certain manuscript may be published in Bulgarian language, with extensive abstract in English. Periodicity: Annually – one issue per year (December). Type: Open Access, hard copy and electronically. Free of charge to publish. About the Journal In 1970, the Natural History Museum - Plovdiv issues Volume 1 of the journal "Bulletin of the Natural Science Museum Plovdiv”. In 1973 Volume 2 was released. Before the release of the independent journal of the Natural History Museum - Plovdiv, researchers at the museum published their articles in "Annuals of the Museums in the Plovdiv Region" and from 1975 in "Bulletin of the museums in Southern Bulgaria", which was published until 1995 (a total of 21 volumes). With the creation of the Bulletin of the Natural History Museum - Plovdiv, the Regional Museum of Natural History - Plovdiv resumed issuing its scientific journal.
    [Show full text]