DOCSLIB.ORG

Mapping Smart Cities in the Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY Mapping Smart Cities in the EU STUDY Abstract This report was commissioned to provide background information and advice on Smart Cities in the European Union (EU) and to explain how existing mechanisms perform. In exploring this, a working definition of a Smart City is established and the cities fitting this definition across the Member States are mapped. An analysis of the objectives and Europe 2020 targets of Smart City initiatives finds that despite their early stage of development, Smart City objectives should be more explicit, well defined and clearly aligned to city development, innovation plans and Europe 2020 in order to be successful. IP/A/ITRE/ST/2013-02 January 2014 PE 507.480 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy. AUTHORS Catriona MANVILLE, RAND Europe Gavin COCHRANE, RAND Europe Jonathan CAVE, RAND Europe Jeremy MILLARD, Danish Technological Institute Jimmy Kevin PEDERSON, Danish Technological Institute Rasmus Kåre THAARUP, Danish Technological Institute Andrea LIEBE, WiK Matthias WISSNER, WiK Roel MASSINK, TNO Bas KOTTERINK, TNO RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Fabrizio PORRINO Balázs MELLÁR Frédéric GOUARDÈRES Signe JENSEN Cécile KÉRÉBEL Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact Policy Department A or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in January 2014 © European Union, 2014 This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Mapping Smart Cities in the EU CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6 LIST OF TABLES 7 LIST OF FIGURES 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 1. INTRODUCTION 15 1.1. Aims and objectives of the study 15 1.2. Methodology 15 1.2.1. Limitations and caveats 16 1.3. Structure of this report 16 2. THE DEFINITION OF A SMART CITY AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS 17 2.1. Background 17 2.2. Smart City definitions 21 2.2.1. Problems of definitions 21 2.2.2. Existing definitions 22 2.2.3. Towards a working definition 23 2.3. Smart City characteristics 26 2.4. The relationship between characteristics and components 29 3. MAPPING SMART CITIES OF EUROPE 32 3.1. How were Smart Cities identified for the study? 32 3.2. What does the sample tell us? 34 3.3. Mapping Smart Cities 38 4. WHAT DOES A SUCCESSFUL SMART CITY LOOK LIKE? 45 4.1. Initiative objectives vs. outcomes 46 4.1.1. Project selection criteria and sampling strategy 46 4.1.2. Approach to project analysis 48 4.1.3. Description of project types 49 4.1.4. Project attributes 53 5. SMART CITIES AND EUROPE 2020 59 5.1. Europe 2020 61 5.1.1. What is the EU’s role in Smart Cities? 62 5.1.2. Analysis of initiatives vis-à-vis Europe 2020 targets 64 PE 507.480 3 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy 5.1.3. The prevalence of Smart City characteristics and their contribution to success 66 5.1.4. Weighted characteristics 69 6. SMART CITY SOLUTIONS AND GOOD PRACTICES 74 6.1. Smart City solutions contribution to Europe 2020 targets 74 6.2. Case study analysis 74 6.2.1. Identifying successful Smart Cities 74 6.2.2. Approach 76 6.2.3. Definition of success factors 76 6.3. Smart City solutions 79 6.3.1. Solutions identified in the case studies 79 6.3.2. Discussion of the solutions found in case studies 81 6.3.3. Economic analysis of Smart City solutions 81 6.3.4. Generic Smart City solutions 83 6.4. Good practice in designing and implementing Smart City Programmes 86 6.4.1. Vision 86 6.4.2. People 86 6.4.3. Process 87 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 88 7.1. Conclusions 88 7.1.1. Status quo: the variety and distribution of Smart Cities and Smart City initiatives 88 7.1.2. Alignment: the relationship between Smart City characteristics and policy objectives 91 7.1.3. Scaling and dissemination 94 7.2. Recommendations 97 7.2.1. Understanding Smart Cities: research and evaluation 98 7.2.2. Designing Smart City initiatives and strategies 99 7.2.3. Smart City governance 101 7.2.4. Supporting the development of Smart Cities 102 7.2.5. From Smart Cities to a Smarter Europe: replication, scaling and ecosystem seeding 103 REFERENCES 106 ANNEX 1: MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE WEIGHTED DISTANCE METRIC 110 ANNEX 2: SUMMARY TABLE OF THE SAMPLE OF 50 SMART CITY PROJECTS ANALYSED AGAINST THE OBJECTIVES DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 4 113 4 PE 507.480 Mapping Smart Cities in the EU ANNEX 3: DISTRIBUTION OF SMART CITY PROJECTS ACROSS THE FIVE PROJECT TYPES 115 ANNEX 4: ADDITIONAL INITIATIVES DESCRIBED IN CHAPTER 4 116 ANNEX 5: DETAILS OF THE FIVE TYPES OF SMART CITY INITIATIVES ANALYSED IN CHAPTER 6 134 ANNEX 6: CASE STUDIES 143 ANNEX 7: COVERAGE OF SMART CITY CHARACTERISTICS 170 ANNEX 8: THE EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE TO IDEAL FOR EACH SMART CITY CHARACTERISTIC 171 ANNEX 9: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SMART CITY CHARACTERISTICS AND BETWEEN SCORES 172 ANNEX 10: DASHBOARDS 175 PE 507.480 5 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ASC Amsterdam Smart City BZFC Barcelona Zona Franca Consortium CAPEX Capital expenditure incurred to create future benefit CIP Competitiveness and Innovation Programme CO2 Carbon dioxide EC European Commission ECO Smart Economy ENV Smart Environment EU European Union FI-PPP Future Internet Public–Private Partnership FP7 Framework Programme 7 GDP Gross domestic product GOV Smart Government IAB Impact Assessment Board ICT Information and communication technology ITRE Industry Research and Energy Committee LED Light emitting diode LIV Smart Living MDDA Manchester Digital Development Agency MOB Smart Mobility MWh Megawatt hour NiCE Networking Intelligent Cities for Energy Efficiency PEO Smart People PPP Public–private partnership PSP Policy Support Programme R&D Research and development SET Science, engineering and technology SMETMC Small and medium-sized enterprise UK United Kingdom USA United States of America 6 PE 507.480 Mapping Smart Cities in the EU LIST OF TABLES Table 1 : Factors for successful Smart Cities 11 Table 2 : Our recommendations and the groups they are intended for 13 Table 3 : Overview of the key Smart City definitions in the literature and this study’s working definition 25 Table 4 : Overview of the six Smart City characteristics 28 Table 5 : The three core factors of Smart City components 29 Table 6 : The geographical distribution of Smart Cities in Europe by Smart City characteristic 44 Table 7: The distribution of Smart City projects across the five project types 48 Table 8: The attributes of Smart City projects by type 53 Table 9: The scaling and dissemination potential of Smart City initiatives 58 Table 10: Europe 2020 targets for the EU as a whole 61 Table 11: The alignment of Smart City characteristics with Europe 2020 targets 62 Table 12: The number of cities with initiatives directly or indirectly aligned with Europe 2020 targets 65 Table 13: The number of initiatives focusing on technologies identified in the Smart Cities technology roadmap 65 Table 14: Clusters of Smart Cities defined by the number of initiatives and variety of characteristics displayed 68 Table 15: Scores and rankings for coverage, unweighted characteristics and performance-weighted characteristics of Smart Cities 71 Table 16: Characteristics of the four groups of Smart City based on the cluster analysis, with examples of cities in each of them 75 Table 17: Overview of success factors for the solutions for six Smart Cities 80 Table 18: Overview of the characteristics and impacts of generic Smart City solutions 85 Table 19 : List of Recommendations 97 PE 507.480 7 Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Sampling hierarchy of cities investigated in the report 16 Figure 2 : The relationship between projects, initiatives and cities 21 Figure 3 : The relationship between components and characteristics of Smart Cities 30 Figure 4 : The ratio of Smart Cities to Smart City initiatives across the EU 34 Figure 5 : Maturity levels across Smart Cities in the EU 35 Figure 6 : The number of Smart Cities in the EU presenting the six Smart City characteristics 36 Figure 7: The average number of Smart City characteristics 37 Figure 8 : The relationship between the maturity level of a Smart City and its population 37 Figure 9 : The relationship between Smart City characteristics and population 38 Figure 10: The location of cities with a population of more than 100,000 that are not Smart Cities and Smart Cities in Europe 39 Figure 11 : The number of Smart Cities per country in Europe 39 Figure 12: The percentage of Smart Cities to cities by country in Europe 40 Figure 13: The location of Smart Cities in Europe by the Smart City characteristics 41 Figure 14: The structure of the analysis in Chapter 5 60 Figure 15: European initiative on the Smart Cities technology roadmap 64 Figure 16: The Euclidean distance to ideal 67 Figure 17: Cluster analysis of Smart City initiatives and the number of characteristics per initiative 68 Figure 18: Weighted average cluster analysis of Smart City initiatives and the number
Recommended publications
  • Recommendations for Implementation of Smart Sustainable City Information and Communication Technology Infrastructures in the APEC Region

    Recommendations for Implementation of Smart Sustainable City Information and Communication Technology Infrastructures in the APEC Region

    Recommendations for Implementation of Smart Sustainable City Information and Communication Technology Infrastructures in the APEC Region APEC Telecommunications and Information Working Group April 2020 APEC Project: TEL 01 2018 Produced by TRAN Nhat Le Viet Nam Telecommunications Authority Duong Dinh Nghe Street, Ha Noi, Viet Nam and NGUYEN Thi Thanh Huong Institute of Posts and Telecommunications Technology Hoang Quoc Viet Street, Ha Noi, Viet Nam For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-TC-01.1 1 CONTENTS Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 5 Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................... 7 Foreword .................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1. Overview of Sustainable Smart City .................................................... 10 1. Smart Sustainable City Introduction .............................................................. 12 1.1 Smart Sustainable City Definition .............................................................. 12 1.2 Smart Sustainable City Architecture .......................................................... 15 1.3 ICT Infrastructures for Smart Sustainable City ......................................... 16
  • Industry and the Smart City

    Industry and the Smart City

    Industry and the smart city ZELDA BRONSTEIN These days, U.S. city planning exudes an funded the Smart Growth Network. The net- audacious air. The suburban sprawl that has work’s nearly forty partners include environ- dominated U.S. development since the Second mental groups; historic preservation organiza- World War is under assault from a multitude of tions; professional associations; developers; real policy makers and activists bent on protecting estate interests; and local, state, and govern- the environment and revitalizing city life. Rally- ment entities. One partner, Smart Growth ing to varied watchwords—smart growth, new America, is itself a coalition of more than one urbanism, sustainable development, green de- hundred national, state, and local organizations, velopment, livable communities, traditional including the Sierra Club, the Congress for the neighborhood development—the insurgent ur- New Urbanism, the American Farmland Trust, banists share key goals: mixing land uses, rais- the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and ing density, and ramping up public transit. In the American Planning Association. Working place of auto-centric, single-use districts both together and independently, these groups reached only via traffic-choked roads, they put sponsor numerous conferences, tours, exposi- housing, shops, and offices close to each other tions, focus groups, forums, publications, and and to ample transit options. Given such op- research projects. They vigorously lobby every tions, they contend, people readily abandon level of government. A copious literature rang- their cars and walk or bike to and from work or ing from books to blogs disseminates smart to the bus, train, trolley, ferry, or light or heavy growth’s principles, showcases its success sto- rail that will carry them to and from work.
  • Finnish Dance in Focus 2017–2018 Editorial Contents Finnish Dance in Focus 2017–2018 P 3

    Finnish Dance in Focus 2017–2018 Editorial Contents Finnish Dance in Focus 2017–2018 P 3

    P 2 FINNISH DANCE IN FOCUS 2017–2018 EDITORIAL CONTENTS FINNISH DANCE IN FOCUS 2017–2018 P 3 Lighting and sound designers Aino on equal terms with other Huovio artists and creatives. Jani-Matti 22–27 FINNISH DANCE IN FOCUS \ 2017–2018 VOLUME EIGHTEEN CAN WE TACKLE Salo \ Mandelin Publisher: Dance Info Finland 28–32 Tallberginkatu 1 C/93, 00180 Helsinki SOCIETY’S PROBLEMS combines styles Tel. +358 (0)9 6121 812 \ from circus [email protected] acrobatics to www.danceinfo.fi THROUGH DANCE? contemporary Editor-in-chief: Sanna Rekola dance. [email protected] Editor: Sanna Kangasluoma In today’s global climate, many feel that we live in a precarious and unsafe world, Ilpo [email protected] and this is also reflected in dance art. Art and artists are taking the opportunity to Vainionpää Editorial board: Sanna Kangasluoma, speak out in defence of empathy, trust, honesty and love. Collaboration is the working Katarina Lindholm, Sanna Rekola method du jour, and individual artistic geniuses and stars have been replaced by work that embraces collective creation between artists from different spheres. 12–19 Writers: Olli Ahlroos, Niko Hallikainen, Jenny Body language and dance can be more effective than mere words when it comes Jägerhorn-Tabermann, Sanna Kangasluoma, to initiating all-encompassing human encounters. Breakdance workshops are being Maija Karhunen, Raisa Rauhamaa, used to prevent and resolve bullying problems involving young people, and a dance Inka Reijonen video made by a church in Helsinki and published on YouTube touched many with English translation: Claire Dickenson, its comforting message. \ Fleur Jeremiah, Lola Rogers Joint performances by a Finnish dance artist and an Iranian musician who applied What means can for asylum in Finland are leaving many in tears, and audience discussions on the topic Graphic design & layout: Inka Kosonen of immigration have become an integral part of the piece.
  • Trust in Smart City Systems

    Trust in Smart City Systems

    January 2020 TRUST IN SMART CITY SYSTEMS Characteristics and Key Considerations Executive Summary The Smart Cities Council, a global advocate for smart city adoption, states that the term “smart cities” still lacks a universally agreed upon definition. [1] However, the term generally refers to the integration of information technology (IT) with the management and operation of civic functions. As these civic functions can include operational technology (OT) elements that monitor and operate physical systems, a smart city system can be seen as representing the intersection of the IT, OT, and public service domains of practice. All three domains are represented by mature fields of practice, but their combination in cross-domain projects can expose gaps within each domain, where key characteristics important to one domain might not be considered by the others. If not addressed, these gaps can introduce security, safety, and privacy risks, including risks to critical infrastructure and its underpinning technology. These risks are not some “distant future” concern. In 2018, investment in smart city technologies is expected to reach $22 billion, and the investment is expected to grow in the future. [2] Hundreds of projects have been deployed or are in some stage of development within the United States. Since these systems are often intended to remain in use for years or decades, the impacts of failures to fully address risks introduced by these systems can be felt for years to come. Between the potential for lingering impact and the aforementioned connection to critical infrastructure, the relevance of smart city projects to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) which is charged with securing this critical infrastructure, is straightforward.
  • SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES and COLLABORATION GSMA Seminars Iot Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28Th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) Prof

    SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES and COLLABORATION GSMA Seminars Iot Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28Th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) Prof

    SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION GSMA Seminars IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) Prof. Luis Muñoz University of Cantabria [email protected] SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION SmartSantander IoT Infrastructure Service Provision Mobility Environmental monitoring Park & gardens Participatory Sensing Augmented Reality Energy Co-creating Massive deployment of IoT devices New urban services Fixed nodes New applications Mobile nodes …relying on the citizen Citizens as sensors Citizens Apps GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Street Parking Management Sensors & Panels installation Service Provision & Monitoring GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Noise Monitoring GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION The Urban Platform GSMA Seminars: IoT Elements: Bringing the Smart City to Life 28th February 2017, Barcelona (Spain) SANTANDER SMART CITY INITIATIVES AND COLLABORATION Co-creating the City of Tomorrow Experimentation as a new urban service . Lead by the citizen . Palette of tools Experiment ers Co-creat ion Tools EXPERIMENTATION AS A SERVICE London Aarhus Sant ander facilit ies Experiment at ion Dat a Communit ies Services GSMA
  • Sata Vuotta Vesihuoltoa Suomessa 1917–2017

    Sata Vuotta Vesihuoltoa Suomessa 1917–2017

    Sata vuotta vesihuoltoa Suomessa 1917–2017 Sata vuotta vesihuoltoa Suomessa 1917–2017 Petri S. Juuti, Tapio S. Katko & Riikka P. Rajala Tämä teos on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä-EiKau- pallinen-EiMuutoksia 4.0 Kansainvälinen -lisenssillä Kiitämme mukana olevia vesilaitoksia tuesta. Kiitos myös VVY:n Kehittä- misrahastolle, Maa- ja vesitekniikan tuki ry:lle sekä Suomen Akatemialle (ReWagons no. 288153). Kannenkuva postikortti vuodelta 1905: Suomi-neito (Sellén Ragnhild). Graafinen suunnittelu ja taitto: Riikka P. Rajala ISBN 978-952-03-0547-5 (pdf) SBN 978-952-03-0546-8 (painettu) 2017 TUP ja Petri S. Juuti, Tapio S. Katko & Riikka P. Rajala Paino Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy – Juvenes Print, Tampere 2017 Sata vuotta vesihuoltoa Sisällysluettelo Luku 1: Pohjoinen veden suurtasavalta 11 Luku 2: Vesihuollon synty, merkitys ja keskeiset kehitysvaiheet 1865-1939 15 Vesi tautien kantajana 16 Uutta tietämystä Euroopasta ja muualta 19 Vesilaitosten ja viemäröinnin synty Suomessa 22 Vesihuollon asiakkaana 25 Luku 3: Keskeiset valinnat ja kehitysvaiheet 27 HÄMEENLINNA 30 Vesilaitoksen synty 30 Vesijohtoa, viemäriä ja kuluttajia 34 Kaupunkialue laajenee 36 Tekopohjavettä 37 Ahvenistolle uusi vedenkäsittelylaitos 1981 38 Vedenkulutus ei enää lisäänny 39 Hämeenlinnan viemäröinti 1960-luvulla 40 Vuosi 2017 43 Haastattelu 43 KANGASALA 48 Teollisuuden vesihuoltoa 49 Naudoille oma vedenkulutusmaksu 52 Vesihuollon ratkaisuja palotoimi mielessä 54 Kirkkojärvi saastuu 55 Pitkäjärven pumppaamo ”paukulla päälle” 57 Kohti yhteistoimintaa: vaikeita valintoja
  • Smart Cities – What’S in It for Citizens?

    Smart Cities – What’S in It for Citizens?

    SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? www.juniperresearch.com SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? 1 Contents Study Background ................................................................................. 2 Smart Cities will Deliver 15 Working Days .......................................... 3 Why do We Need Smart Cities? ............................................................ 4 How do These Factors Affect Me Today?............................................ 5 Global City Performance 2017 .............................................................. 6 Mobility ................................................................................................... 7 Case Study: San Francisco................................................................... 7 Healthcare............................................................................................... 7 Case Study: Seoul ................................................................................. 7 Public Safety .......................................................................................... 7 Case Study: New York City ................................................................... 7 Productivity ............................................................................................ 7 Case Study: London .............................................................................. 7 Appendix: Study Methodology ............................................................. 7 SMART CITIES – WHAT’S IN IT FOR CITIZENS? 2 What is a Smart City?
  • The Mega Cities, the Smart Cities, the Sustainable Cities

    The Mega Cities, the Smart Cities, the Sustainable Cities

    The Mega Cities, The Smart Cities, The Sustainable Cities Robert W. FOSTER , USA Key Words: Mega cities, homo sapiens, artificial intelligence, the internet of things, infrastructure, e-systems, interconnectivity, climate change, sustainability. Introduction Modern science dates the Agricultural Revolution to about 12,000 years ago. Homo sapiens, hunters and gatherers for the previous 150 thousand years more or less, began to cultivate wheat which bound them to the land due to seasonal demands of planting, nurturing, harvesting and storage of grains. Instead of roaming over large areas they began to settle into shelters and eventually into villages. The success of the new paradigm of living resulted in collective labor arrangements that led to community security and social cooperation. A logical extension of industry and commerce was development of the city which, in turn has led to innovation, invention, social advancement and, in some views, prosperity. Social scientists, historians and anthropologists may differ as to the value of urban life to the advancement of homo sapiens, but the studies continue and predictions persist. What is the ultimate future of the city – will it prosper to a point of security and happiness for all, or will the city, by concentrating all its environmental and biological risks into ever more clustered areas spell the end of civilization as we know it? In short, is the city sustainable? In fact cities have become the preferred living arrangement for a majority of the World’s population, evolving into what are called Mega Cities. The marvel of the internet in this digital age with its possibilities of instant communication and immediate control of most or all functions of homo sapiens now in the 21st century, are expected to develop the Smart Cities for a majority of us which in turn will make urban sustainability possible a mere 12,000 years after we had begun living and working together: the Sustainable City.
  • Annual Review 2010

    Annual Review 2010

    Review of 2010 – EUR version Contents Group overview 2010 in brief 2 Comments by the President and CEO 4 Mission, goals and strategy 6 Profitable Growth, 2011–2015 9 Segment reporting 10 Financial and qualitative targets 12 Risk management 14 New Karolinska Solna 16 Green Refurbishments 17 Employees 18 Share data 20 Business streams Construction 22 Residential Development 34 Commercial Property Development 42 Infrastructure Development 50 Sustainable development 60 Financial information Report of the Directors 69 Corporate governance report 76 Consolidated income statement 83 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 84 Consolidated statement of financial position 85 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 87 Consolidated cash flow statement 88 Notes, table of contents 90 Statement by the President and Chief Executive Officer 157 Independent Auditors’ Report 158 Senior Executive Team 162 Board of Directors 164 Major events during 2010 166 Definitions and abbreviations 170 More information about Skanska 171 Addresses 172 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting 173 Investors 173 The financial statements presented in this Review have been prepared in EUR (euros) as the presentation currency. As the functional currency of the Parent Company is SEK (Swedish kronor), Skanska’s statutory Annual Report including the consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of the Parent Company has been prepared using Swedish kronor (SEK) as the presentation currency. For currency exchange rates, see page 140. Reporting of earnings, revenue and key ratios in the first part of the Review of 2010 (pages 1–68) complies with the segment reporting method described on page 10. The Skanska Group Senior Executive Team Skanska Financial Services Group Staff Units Construction Residential Development Commercial Property Development Infrastructure Development Skanska Sweden Skanska Residential Development Skanska Commercial Skanska Nordic Development Nordic Infrastructure Development Skanska Norway Skanska Finland Skanska Poland Skanska Resid.
  • Maakunta Ja Metropoli Suomen Kulttuurirahaston Uudenmaan Rahasto 1963–2013

    Maakunta Ja Metropoli Suomen Kulttuurirahaston Uudenmaan Rahasto 1963–2013

    1 Riitta Mäkinen Maakunta ja metropoli Suomen Kulttuurirahaston Uudenmaan rahasto 1963–2013 Ulkoasu: Rinna Saramäki ISBN 978-952-99411-8-6 Suomen Kulttuurirahasto 2013 2 3 TAUSTA asiamies Hovinheimon kauteen; Rekrytointi hoitokuntaan ja kokemukset Suomalaiskansallisen kulttuurin ja maakuntien Suomen puolesta 7 Yhteistyötä 100 Uusimaa – ”rikkinäinen maakunta”? 10 Muut rahoittajat; Kannatusyhdistys ja neuvottelupäivät; Kulttuuriympäristöseminaa- ri? Hautausmaakulttuuri; Linnankoski-mitalit; Uudenmaan liiton kulttuuriohjelma KETKÄ, MITEN – paluu rahaston lähtökohtaan? Toiveikas alku 15 Aloite Hyvinkäältä, Maakuntaliitto valmisteli; Hoitokunta, perustamistilaisuus ja NIMIKKORAHASTOKEHITYSTÄ alkurahoitus; Kansalaiskeräykset ja lahjoitajien motivointi; Ensimmäinen apuraha- Vaikuttajia onnitellen tai muistoa kunnioittaen 105 jako ja vuosijuhla loivat mallin; Kunnat rahoittajiksi; Ensimmäiset nimikkorahastot; Aluelehdet ja niiden rahastot – merkittävä osa maakuntarahaston historiaa; Einar ja Hoitokuntavaihdos, Salosen poismeno, nimikkorahasto ja seuraaja Vahermo Anna Winqvistin rahasto; Markku Salosen - ; Heikki von Hertzenin - ; Kauko Kam- Vaikeasti vastattavia haasteita 42 mosen - ; Sirkka, Kauko ja Matti Holman - ; Joonas Kokkosen- ; Tuusulan rantatien Julkishallinto mukaan kulttuurin tukemiseen; Uusimaa-problematiikkaa vuosijuhlissa rahasto – Tuusulanjärven taiteilijayhteisön 100-vuotisrahasto, Orimattila-rahasto ja maakuntahistoria-hankkeena Uudemmat, testamentteihin perustuvat rahastot 114 Impi Heinosen rahasto; Veera Kaartolan -; Jaakko
  • Building the Smart City Government Insights Building the Smart City Building the Smart City

    Building the Smart City Government Insights Building the Smart City Building the Smart City

    Deloitte Center for Building the smart city Government Insights Building the smart city Building the smart city About the authors Rana Sen is a managing director with Deloitte Consulting LLP’s Technology practice. He leads the U.S. Consulting Public Sector Smart City initiative, where his work focuses on strategies and implementations to help cities achieve increased economic competiveness, sustainable practices, and a higher quality of life for their residents. Connect with him at [email protected] or on Twitter @_ranasen or LinkedIn. William D. Eggers is the executive director of the Deloitte Center for Government Insights and author of nine books, including Delivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technology That Are Transforming Government. His commentary has appeared in dozens of major media outlets including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. He can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter @wdeggers. Mahesh Kelkar is a research manager with the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. He closely tracks the federal and state government sectors, focusing on in-depth research into the intersection of technology with government operations, policy and decision-making. Connect with him at [email protected] or on LinkedIn, or follow him on Twitter @Mahesh_Kelkar Smart city 2.0: The second wave in smart city transformation The term “smart city” doesn’t describe a sci-fi utopia. A smart city is simply one that About the Deloitte Center for Government Insights uses technology to improve outcomes across every aspect of city operations and enhance the services it offers to its residents. It collects and uses data to drive its decision-making, and creates networks of partners among governments, businesses, The Deloitte Center for Government Insights shares inspiring stories of government innovation, looking at what’s behind the adoption of new technologies and management practices.
  • SMARTCITYPHL Roadmap

    SMARTCITYPHL Roadmap

    SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL SMARTCITYPHL Roadmap Table of Contents Introduction 2 Guiding Principles 3 Methodology 4 Existing Assets & Initiatives 5 Reading Guide 6 Strategy 1: Build a strong foundation with 7 policy and infrastructure Strategy 2: Create a process for engagement and 15 partnership Strategy 3: Support and sustain implementation of 20 projects and programs with funding Timeline of Activities 23 1 INTRODUCTION Lead Department: Office of The City of Philadelphia established the SmartCityPHL Innovation & Technology initiative in 2017 to better understand and implement Cabinet Representative: smart and emerging technology solutions that would Chief Administrative Officer improve City service delivery for its broad community of residents, businesses, and visitors. A key component of Working Group: this initiative was to develop this roadmap of strategies Department of Streets and processes to drive the initiative forward. Waste & Litter Cabinet This roadmap is intended to serve as an initial guide to Office of Sustainability. Energy spur innovation and collaboration in City government Office around smart city and the policies and technology Office of Transportation, surrounding it. It is intentionally designed for broad Infrastructure & Sustainability application so that as people and technology change, fundamental practices are applied while leaving room Philadelphia Water Department for iteration when it comes to specific projects and Department of Public Health, programs that