CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Pull

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Pull CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Pull Factors that Can Make a Microstate an Attractive Destination for American Tourists: The Case of Andorra A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Tourism, Hospitality, and Recreation Management By Lluís Miquel Gonzàlez Solà May 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Lluís Miquel Gonzàlez Solà ​ All rights reserved. This thesis or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review or scholarly journal. ii The graduate thesis of Lluís Miquel Gonzàlez Solà is approved: _______________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Mechelle Best Date _______________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Joong-won Lee Date _______________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Hui (Jimmy) Xie, Chair Date California State University, Northridge iii Acknowledgment I sincerely thank my committee members, Dr. Joong-won Lee and Dr. Mechelle Best for sharing their expertise throughout this project. Special thanks to the committee chair Dr. Hui (Jimmy) Xie for his time, guidance, and encouragement. There are people in everyone’s lives who make success both possible and rewarding. Special thanks go to Nelli Marutyan and Wendy Brown for their invaluable help during this process. Also, this Master’s project could not be completed without the funding support from the Office of Research and Graduate Studies. Last but not least, I would like to express my gratitude to the Department of Tourism & Education of Andorra and especially to the Fulbright Committee for giving me the opportunity to pursue my Master’s program in the United States of America. iv Dedication This is for you, Vikki. v Table of Contents Copyright ii Signature Page iii Acknowledgment iv Dedication v List of Figures vii List of Tables viii Abstract ix Introduction 1 Literature Review 5 Travel decision process 6 ​ Understanding the tourists´ motivators 8 ​ Definition of pull factors 12 ​ Microstates as tourism suppliers 16 ​ ​ Andorra’s overview 19 ​ ​ Pull factors of Andorra 21 ​ ​ Current issues regarding tourism in Andorra 22 ​ Andorra as a complementary destination 25 ​ The tourism demand: US tourist 27 ​ Methodology 29 Method´s design 30 Sample 30 Structure 31 Logistics and outcome 33 Data Analysis 34 Results 36 Conclusion 45 References 47 Appendix A: Research Instrument 54 ​ vi List of Figures Figure 1. Study variables 3 Figure 2. Consumer’s decision making process 7 Figure 3. Travel process 7 Figure 4. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs 10 Figure 5. Travel Career Ladder 11 Figure 6. Consolidated nine attributes and dimensions assessing the destination image 22 Figure 7. Europe’s map 24 Figure 8. US outbound tourists’ arrivals to Spain 30 Figure 9. Concept groups 35 Figure 10. Travel decision process diagram 42 vii List of Tables Table 1. Attributes and dimensions assessing the destination image perceived by the tourist 15 Table 2. Arrivals of non-resident tourists at national borders 23 Table 3. Sample demographics distribution 33 Table 4. Focus groups schedule 34 Table 5. Individual interviews schedule 34 Table 6. What are US tourists’ perceptions of Andorra as a destination? 36 Table 7. What pull factors are more relevant for US tourists for choosing Andorra (Categories) 38 Table 8. What pull factors are more relevant for US tourists for choosing Andorra (Items) 40 viii Abstract Pull Factors that Can Make a Microstate an Attractive Destination for American Tourists: the Case of Andorra By Lluís Miquel Gonzàlez Solà Master of Science in Tourism, Hospitality, and Recreation Management While many microstates rely on tourism as a way of economic development, little research has been conducted on how to market and promote a microstate destination to distant international markets. Based on previous research on tourist motivations and decisions, this research argues that tourists from distant markets may consider traveling to a microstate if the right pull factors (destination features) are promoted. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to explore which pull factors have the potential to make a microstate an attractive destination for US tourists, using the landlocked European microstate of Andorra as a study case. To address the study purpose, a qualitative research method was employed. First, purposive sampling was used to select twenty US residents that traveled to Spain, Andorra’s ix neighboring state. The sample consisted of individuals of different age and household income ranges. Then, four focus groups and four individual interviews were conducted to explore the attractiveness of Andorra´s pull factors. The results of this study indicated that the small size of the country made it difficult for Andorra to be considered as a sole destination for American tourists. However, Andorra’s local culture, mountain scenery, entertainment opportunities, and outdoor activities may be marketed to American tourists visiting Spain or France as an opportunity to discover another country during their trip. In addition, participants mentioned uniqueness and unknownness as potential reasons for traveling to Andorra. Those two elements may have marketing opportunities as they are arguably more applicable to microstates than larger countries. This study contributed to tourism marketing literature by examining the effectiveness of pull factors in the promotion of microstates as travel destinations. In addition, the study results provided practical recommendations for developing Andorra’s international tourism marketing strategies. Keywords: Travel Motivators, Pull Factors, Microstate, Andorra, US tourist ​ x Introduction Tourism plays a critical role in the economy of a microstate. In fact, the idea that tourism is almost inevitable as a form of economic development (Wilkinson, 1989) has been stated by many authors that have written about tourism to microstates (Fagence, 1997; Ford, 2016; Milne, 1992; Milne & Nowosielski, 1997). Destination Marketing Organizations (DMO) in microstates have been working on developing strategies to attract tourism from distant countries like the United States, China or India (Sharma & Zemp, 2016). US residents have one of the most significant expenditures on outbound tourism in the world spending more than 160 billion dollars every year for this purpose (World Bank, 2016); however, there is a limited understanding of how to promote microstate destinations to distant international markets such as the United States. Assessing the motivators of travelers and developing a customer profile of potential visitors can maximize the overall value of the destination by tailoring the destination tourist products to the visitors´ needs (Kutner & Cripps, 1997). However, there is a lack of agreement upon the conceptualization of tourism motivation (Fodness, 1994). Several authors have accepted the push/pull model as an acceptable principle (Crompton, 1979; Hanqin & Lam, 1999; Lam & Hsu, 2004). This research uses the push/pull model as its theoretical framework. Pull factors are defined as the "drawing force generated by the overall attractions existing in a given place" (Kaur, 1981, p.19). Whereas, push factors are the intrinsic motivations that make visitors look for activities to fulfill their needs, such as the need to escape, relax, fame, health or socialization (Crompton, 1979). Because push factors are more linked to the development of the travel need (Bello & Etzel, 1985), this research solely focuses on the pull factors as they are considered more influential during the destination choice process (Bello & Etzel, 1985). The pull factors of the 1 study destination were segmented using the nine dimensions and attributes determining the perceived tourist destination image of Beerli and Martı́n (2004) and consolidating them within four areas: (1) Natural and cultural resources, (2) tourist and leisure infrastructure, (3) opportunities for sports activities, and (4) atmosphere, social setting, and social environment. The purpose of this research is to examine what pull factors have the potential to make a microstate an attractive destination to distant markets, using the landlocked European microstate of Andorra as a study case. Three reasons supported the selection of Andorra as a study case. First, with less than 80,000 inhabitants, Andorra is a microstate by definition, as it is “a sovereign country with a population below 2 million inhabitants” (World Economic Policy and Debt Department, 2005, p.3). Second, tourism is a central pillar in the economy of Andorra; with the service activity representing the 89% of the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and with a tourism industry that employs 14.7% of the country's overall labor force (Andorra Department of Statistics, 2017). Third, Andorra’s tourism industry relies heavily on tourists from neighboring countries, such as Spain, which represented 71% of the total arrivals to the country in 2016 (World Tourism Organization, 2017). This dependence on the Spanish market may condition Andorra to diversify its tourism markets by promoting its travel experiences to more distant countries. Yet, Andorra Tourism Organizations have done little promotion of their tourism products to the US market. Andorra as a country has enough potential of turning into a popular leisure-destination for US tourists. Having one of the lowest crime rates in the world, Andorra
Recommended publications
  • Island Microstates: the Mirage Ofdevelopment
    , , Island Microstates: The Mirage ofDevelopment John Connell There are twenty politically independent island microstates in the devel­ oping world-that is, states with populations of less than a million (Table I). Though various definitions of Third World microstates are possible (that might also include Mauritius, Nauru, or Singapore) none are as con­ venient as this crude generalization. In this paper I examine development trends in these states, reflect on the meaning of independence, and com­ pare and contrast the experience of these states with dependent and often neighboring territories and colonies. In particular I focus on the extent to which the structure of economic change is conducive to long-term devel­ opment, and seek to compare the experiences of Pacific states with those of other island microstates. These experiences are often shared by larger countries (such as Jamaica or Papua New Guinea) and by landlocked states, either in Africa (eg, Lesotho) or Asia (eg, Bhutan) or even in Europe (eg, Andorra and Liechtenstein): "it is not always easy to disentan­ gle the effects of smallness from those of remoteness and peripheralness­ or from those of newness. It may not in the end be specially profitable to try to do so" (Davies 1985, 248; cf, Connell 1988a). I shall not do so here. Islands are not so unusual, but small island states are quite different from larger states, in the structure and context of their economic development. Definitions of development have been legion, mainly revolving around issues such as basic needs, equity, self-reliance, and power. More than twenty years ago the economist Dudley Seers suggested, "The questions to ask about a country's development are: What has been happening to pov­ erty? What has been happening to unemployment? What has been hap­ pening to inequality?" (1969, 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilla: a Tourism Success Story?
    Visions in Leisure and Business Volume 14 Number 4 Article 4 1996 Anguilla: A Tourism Success Story? Paul F. Wilkinson York University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/visions Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Paul F. (1996) "Anguilla: A Tourism Success Story?," Visions in Leisure and Business: Vol. 14 : No. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/visions/vol14/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Visions in Leisure and Business by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@BGSU. ANGUILLA: A TOURISM SUCCESS STORY? BY DR. PAUL F. WILKINSON, PROFESSOR FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES YORK UNIVERSITY 4700KEELE STREET NORTH YORK, ONTARIO CANADA MJJ 1P3 ABSTRACT More than any other Caribbean community, the Anguillans [sic )1 have Anguilla is a Caribbean island microstate the sense of home. The land has been that has undergone dramatic tourism growth, theirs immemorially; no humiliation passing through the early stages of Butler's attaches to it. There are no Great tourist cycle model to the "development" houses2 ; there arenot even ruins. (32) stage. This pattern is related to deliberate government policy and planning decisions, including a policy of not having a limit to INTRODUCTION tourism growth. The resulting economic dependence on tourism has led to positive Anguilla is a Caribbean island microstate economic benefits (e.g., high GDP per that has undergone dramatic tourism growth, capita, low unemployment, and significant passing through the early stages of Butler's localinvolvement in the industry). (3) tourist cycle model to the "development" stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Nations' Political Aversion to the European Microstates
    UN-WELCOME: The United Nations’ Political Aversion to the European Microstates -- A Thesis -- Submitted to the University of Michigan, in partial fulfillment for the degree of HONORS BACHELOR OF ARTS Department Of Political Science Stephen R. Snyder MARCH 2010 “Elephants… hate the mouse worst of living creatures, and if they see one merely touch the fodder placed in their stall they refuse it with disgust.” -Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, 77 AD Acknowledgments Though only one name can appear on the author’s line, there are many people whose support and help made this thesis possible and without whom, I would be nowhere. First, I must thank my family. As a child, my mother and father would try to stump me with a difficult math and geography question before tucking me into bed each night (and a few times they succeeded!). Thank you for giving birth to my fascination in all things international. Without you, none of this would have been possible. Second, I must thank a set of distinguished professors. Professor Mika LaVaque-Manty, thank you for giving me a chance to prove myself, even though I was a sophomore and studying abroad did not fit with the traditional path of thesis writers; thank you again for encouraging us all to think outside the box. My adviser, Professor Jenna Bednar, thank you for your enthusiastic interest in my thesis and having the vision to see what needed to be accentuated to pull a strong thesis out from the weeds. Professor Andrei Markovits, thank you for your commitment to your students’ work; I still believe in those words of the Moroccan scholar and will always appreciate your frank advice.
    [Show full text]
  • MICRO-STATES in the INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM The
    MICRO-STATES IN THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM The Challenge of Sovereignty by JOHN BARRY BARTMANN In submission for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The London School of Economics and Political Science The University of London UMI Number: U615182 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615182 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 l WCL£ S F 7 4-Fo ABSTRACT The last forty years have witnessed a proliferation of veiy small states, or micro- atates with populations of approximately one million or less. Most of these states are developing economies but in recent years even the smallest European micro-states have won acceptance in the councils of the organised international system. This study is a comprehensive examination of the international relations of these states in three principal areas of concern: issues of status and legitimacy; the conduct of diplomacy and the efforts of micro-states to achieve strategies of self-reliant economic development. While the research has confirmed the vulnerabilities of micro-states in all three areas which have been stressed in the literature of the last decade, it also reveals surprising opportunities for some micro-states to ameliorate their weaknesses and to achieve a constructive engagements within the international system.
    [Show full text]
  • Among Microstates Expand, Orjoin a Reqiof),,L
    \Ws 19IL POLICY RESEARCH WORKING PAPER 1922 Public Disclosure Authorized Regional Groupings Thismocl-;hoosthitL microstate'sdecisio-)n to rcra:, Among Microstates expand, orJoin a reqiof),,l Public Disclosure Authorized organization is based on Soamiely Andriamananjara reducednegotiating cos[s arnd increasedI bargG,irjar Maurice Schiff power,rarhar than nt t' traditional custsa-ra her efiU, of trade integration. Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank DevelopmentResearch Group May1998 POLICY RESEARCHJ VVORMKN': PAINFPR1922 Summary findings Forming a regional grouping with neighboring nations Under various conditions for entry, the model is used may be one way for microstates to overcome a major to determine the equilibrium group size, which is shown problem: Because of their weak bargaining power and to be positively correlated with the number of issues to high fixed costs of negotiation, microsrates are at a be tackled, the degree of similarity among countries, and severe disadvantage in dealing with the rest of the world. the per-issue costs of international negotiation. They don't have the hunman and physical resources to They use the case of the Caribbean Conmmunity unilaterally conduct the various bilateral and mnultilaterai (CARICOM) to show the model's relevance in the r eal negotiations a developing nation typically conducts. world. The countries that belong to CARICOM pooled Andriamananiara and Schiff present a model in which their negotiating resources and formulated common the decision to form, expand, or join a regional "club" is policy stances. Despite its relatively limited impact on based on reduced negotiating costs and increased trade and investments, CARICOM served as a political bargaining power, rather than on the traditionial costs instrument in joint negotiations on trade and investment and benefits of trade integration (which might be with larger countries and regional trade blocs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Fiji Islands
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 12-13-2011 Explaining Investment Policies in Microstates: The Case of the Fiji Islands Sudarsan Kant University of Missouri-St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Kant, Sudarsan, "Explaining Investment Policies in Microstates: The Case of the Fiji Islands" (2011). Dissertations. 395. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/395 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Explaining Investment Policies in Microstates: The Case of the Fiji Islands By Sudarsan Kant A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Missouri-St. Louis In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy In Political Science November 15, 2011 Advisory Committee Kenneth Thomas, PhD., (Chair) Nancy Kinney, Ph.D. Eduardo Silva, Ph.D. Daniel Hellinger, Ph.D. Abstract . Prevailing theories have failed to take into account the development of policy and institutions in microstates that are engineered to attract investments in areas of comparative advantage as these small islands confront the challenges of globalization and instead have emphasized migration, remittances and foreign aid (MIRAB) as an explanation for the survival of microstates in the global economy. This dissertation challenges the MIRAB model as an adequate explanation of investment strategy in microstates and argues that comparative advantage is a better theory to explain policy behavior of microstates.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Is Democratic, but Who Is Small?
    1 Arts and Social Sciences Journal, Volume 2010: ASSJ-2 Small Is Democratic, But Who Is Small? Dag Anckar Professor Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Åbo Akademi University, Finland. Correspondence: Dag Anckar, [email protected] Published online: January, 2010 Abstract Several studies indicate a significant correlation between small states and democracy, smallness usually being defined in terms of microstates with populations of less than one million. However, no convincing model has emerged so far of the mechanisms that serve to transform smallness into democratic conduct. This is probably in part a consequence of the negligence of the fact that the smallness-democracy relation is within the microstate camp time-dependent as well threshold-dependent. A mechanical application of the conventional microstate criteria therefore appears a somewhat doubtful method to achieve an understanding of the true impact of smallness. Keywords: Democracy; microstates; size thresholds; state size. Introduction Research on democratic government suggests that small states are more likely to be democratic than large states. Indeed, an abundance of findings support this belief: state size is a more useful category than degree of development or geographic location for understanding the prerequisites for democracy, a large majority of microstates are democracies compared to a much smaller portion of larger countries, there is a significant correlation between small island states and democracy, with a decrease in the size of the political unit, the likelihood of durable freedom and democracy increases. Summarizing the literature in the field Henry Srebrnik concludes that small country size has been shown to be conducive to democracy, that smallness reinforces popular rule, and that evidence indicates that a significant feature about many small island jurisdictions has been their ability to maintain democratic political systems [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Non-Contiguity on Devolution in Small States
    Island Studies Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2007, pp. 193-208 Archipelagos and Political Engineering: The Impact of Non-Contiguity on Devolution in Small States Dag Anckar Åbo Akademi University Finland [email protected] Abstract Political architecture differences have only seldom been explained in the political science literature by reference to physical factors like size and geography. Correcting this neglect while focusing on microstates and especially on archipelago geographies, this article aims at uncovering the impact of geographical non-contiguity on political institution-building. Three separate devices for power devolution - federalism, bicameralism and assembly quotas - perform as dependent variables, and the guiding hypothesis is, for each device, that the device is implemented among archipelagos to a higher extent than among contiguous entities. Although there are marked differences between devices, the findings in general support the belief that territorial non-contiguity is more likely to foster power devolution. The findings also survive controls that investigate the impact of contesting factors. Keywords: archipelagos, contiguity, devolution, islandness, political institution Copyright © 2007 Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction Countries differ in terms of politico-institutional architecture, and the differences have been explained in the literature by reference to a multitude of factors and country characteristics. While some regard political institutions and devices as “problem-solvers” (Laponce & Saint-Jacques, 1997), designed to manage and ward off problems that emanate from the social structure of society, others pay more attention to cultural factors, such as colonial heritage (e.g. Anckar, 2004), or to demographic factors, like the ethnic composition of the population (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Law WP 51 Lopez Cover
    Stanford – Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum A joint initiative of Stanford Law School and the University of Vienna School of Law European Union Law Working Papers No. 51 San Marino: Navigating the European Union as a Microstate Thomas W. Lopez 2021 European Union Law Working Papers Editors: Siegfried Fina and Roland Vogl About the European Union Law Working Papers The European Union Law Working Paper Series presents research on the law and policy of the European Union. The objective of the European Union Law Working Paper Series is to share “works in progress”. The authors of the papers are solely responsible for the content of their contributions and may use the citation standards of their home country. The working papers can be found at http://ttlf.stanford.edu. The European Union Law Working Paper Series is a joint initiative of Stanford Law School and the University of Vienna School of Law’s LLM Program in European and International Business Law. If you should have any questions regarding the European Union Law Working Paper Series, please contact Professor Dr. Siegfried Fina, Jean Monnet Professor of European Union Law, or Dr. Roland Vogl, Executive Director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science and Technology, at: Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum http://ttlf.stanford.edu Stanford Law School University of Vienna School of Law Crown Quadrangle Department of Business Law 559 Nathan Abbott Way Schottenbastei 10-16 Stanford, CA 94305-8610 1010 Vienna, Austria About the Author Thomas W. Lopez is a J.D. candidate at Stanford Law School. He earned his bachelor’s degree in History from Yale University in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Central America. Global Forces, Rebellion, and Change
    Booth “Prior editions of Understanding Central America had become the classic work in the field, both in the classroom and as an academic reference. This new edition is a major upgrade, not only involving updating of events, but rethinking the Wade Wade theoretical issues that are at the heart of any understanding of the region. A ‘must read’ for anyone interested in this complex and volatile area of the world.” —Mitchell A. SeligSon, VAnderbilt UniVerSity Understanding Walker “Understanding Central America remains the most comprehensive and indispensable textbook for courses on Central American politics. It offers a classic interpretation of the roots of civil wars and U.S. interventions in late twentieth-century Central Central America. This new edition has been reorganized and updated to address the region’s post-war issues of the twenty-first century, incorporating new scholarship relevant for analysis over the long run.” Central —Susanne Jonas, UniVerSity of cAliforniA, SAntA crUz Understanding Understanding ameriCa “This volume is without doubt the best comprehensive examination of Central F i F t h E d i t i o n American politics and society. The book represents a good balance between an intellectually sophisticated analysis and a clear, concise approach readily accessible for undergraduate students.” —orlAndo J. Pérez, centrAl MichigAn UniVerSity; PreSident, MidweSt AssociAtion for lAtin AMericAn StUdieS Understanding Central America explains how domestic and global political and economic forces have shaped rebellion and regime change in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. a Including analysis of the 2009 Honduran coup d’état, this revised edition brings the Central American story up to date, with special emphasis on globalization, evolving public opinion, progress toward me democratic consolidation, and the relationship between Central America and the United States under the Obama administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Challenges Faced by Small Island Economies: an Overview1
    ISSN: 1444-8890 ECONOMIC THEORY, APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES Working Paper No. 58 Economic Challenges Faced by Small Island Economies: An Overview by Clem Tisdell September 2009 THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND ISSN 1444-8890 ECONOMIC THEORY, APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES (Working Paper) Working Paper No. 58 Economic Challenges Faced by Small Island Economies: An Overview1 by Clem Tisdell2 September 2009 © All rights reserved 1 This is the draft of an article for inclusion in Öner Günçavdi (ed) The Challenge of EU Enlargement: Northern Cyprus – Understanding a Small Island Economy in Isolation Nova Science Publishers, New York. 2 School of Economics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia Email: [email protected] ` WORKING PAPERS IN THE SERIES, Economic Theory, Applications and Issues, are published by the School of Economics, University of Queensland, 4072, Australia. For more information write to Professor Clem Tisdell, School of Economics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia Campus, Brisbane 4072, Australia or email [email protected] Economic Challenges Faced by Small Island Economies: An Overview ABSTRACT As pointed out in this article, small island economies are diverse in their nature and in the challenges they face. A taxonomy of these economies is provided. The overview takes account of small island economies that are satellites of large countries as well as those which are independent nation states. Nevertheless, the emphasis here is on small island economies that are remote from central economies or disadvantaged in other ways. These include many island nations in the Pacific and elsewhere. Such economies suffer from diseconomies of scale in economic activity, are prone to imperfect market competition, and experience high transport and trading costs for a variety of reasons which are outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of Micro-States: Main Arising Issues
    Sidiropoulos George, Regional Science Inquiry Journal, I, 1, (2009), pp.45-57 45 GEOGRAPHY OF MICRO-STATES: MAIN ARISING ISSUES Sidiropoulos George Department of Geography, University of the Aegean University Hill, 81100 Mytilene, Greece Email: [email protected] Abstract: News is often interspersed with reports from small islands. Reference is often made to them due to their small size, or due to their administrative autonomy or financial regime; usually attracting the common interest. Actually, what are the so-called microstates, virtual lands, unrecognized state entities, or ephemeral states? Their de facto distance from the centers of socio-economic developments contributes to the conservation of both their traditional social web and their natural environment, but at the same time, it deprives them the opportunities to keep in pace with the modern developments and renders them under the status of isolation. On the one hand, the barrier resulting from natural obstacles acts like a filter that bars the introduction of opportunistic innovations, and on the other hand geographical proximity would make contact with progress feasible. In other words, situation acts as an immune system which secures the better health of microstates. Keywords: Microstate, micronation, small economies, insular space, quasi-state, sovereignty, development. 1. Introduction News is quite often interspersed with reports from small islands in the middle of the ocean. Reference is often made to them due to their small size, or due to their administrative autonomy or financial regime; usually attracting the common interest. Actually, what are the so-called microstates, virtual lands, unrecognized state entities, or ephemeral states? 2. How small is Micro? The basic step in the study of microstates is to define the concept of size.
    [Show full text]