DOCSLIB.ORG

PENSACOLA PASS, FL INLET MANAGEMENT STUDY Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PENSACOLA PASS, FL INLET MANAGEMENT STUDY Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request F 01 August 2017 PENSACOLA PASS, FL INLET MANAGEMENT STUDY Florida Beach Management Funding Assistance Program Local Government Funding Request FY 2018 – 2019 Beach and Inlet Shoal Surveys, Inlet Management Study, Development of Inlet Management Plan LOCAL SPONSOR: Escambia County, FL Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, FL olsen associates, inc. LGFR 2018-2019 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FY2018/19 Local Government Funding Request Inlet Projects Application PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION Local Sponsor: ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FL Local Sponsor Federal ID Number (FEID): Contact Name: TO BE PROVIDED WITH RESOLUTION Title: Mailing Address Line 1: Mailing Address Line 2: City: Pensacola, FL Zip: Telephone: Email Address: Additional Contact Information: PART II: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that all information provided with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature of Local Sponsor Date Printed Name (Electronic/scanned signature accepted) 01 August 2017 Pensacola Pass, FL Inlet Management Study & Inlet Management Plan Development Escambia County, FL FDEP FY 2018-2019 Local Government Funding Request PART III: EVALUATION CRITERIA 1. Project Name: Pensacola Pass, FL, Inlet Management Study 2. Project Description: Pensacola Pass is a large tidal inlet in Escambia County, FL, that connects the Gulf of Mexico with Pensacola Bay (Figure 1). The Pass hosts a Federally-authorized deepwater navigation channel that provides safe passage from the Gulf to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), Naval Air Station Pensacola (NASP), Pensacola Harbor, and other points in the Pensacola Bay area. The maintained deepwater navigation channel disrupts the natural drift of sand in and across the tidal inlet between Santa Rosa Island and Perdido Key. Periodic maintenance dredging places some portion of the impounded sand back into the littoral system, however, the trapping of sand by the navigation channel does alter the adjacent shorelines for several miles in both directions, inducing erosion due to sand starvation in some areas. The Pass lies between FDEP R-monuments R-67 and R-68. 3. Use of Requested Program Funds: Consistent with the FDEP Strategic Beach Management Plan (SBMP), funds for FY 2018-2019 will be applied for: Topographic/ hydrographic survey of 101 R-monument beach profiles (R-001 to R-101, Escambia County, FL), Hydrographic survey of the ebb shoal, throat, and flood shoal areas of Pensacola Pass, Analyses and development of an inlet management study of Pensacola Pass, which will include analyses of beach, channel, and shoal volume changes over different time periods, compilation and analyses of dredging records, modeling of alongshore transport in the vicinity of the inlet, analysis of sand disposal practices, and the development of a sediment budget for current conditions. Previous investigators have reported upon work at the Pass, including an inlet management study performed by the University of Florida (Browder and Dean, 1999). Develop recommendations from the study for maximizing sand bypassing and improving sand management activities at the Pass, to be delivered in the form of a proposed Inlet Management Plan to be presented to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for consideration for adoption. Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, FL olsen associates, inc. FY 2018-2019 Funding Request 1 01 August 2017 R-111 Gulf Breeze R-106 R-101 R-96 Bay Pensacola R-91 R-86 Sta 0+00 GRAPHIC SCALE Santa Rosa IslandR-81 Ft. R-76 Pickens R-71 Navy Channel Sta 401+51 Pass Sta NAS Pensacola 226+00 R-66A Pensacola R-61 R-56 R-51 R-46 12.0 miles (st)* ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FL R-41 Disposal Site (ODMDS) Ocean Dredged Material Perdido Key R-36 R-31 FLORIDA ALABAMA R-26 R-21 la Pass, Escambia County, FL. PKSP R-16 Gulf of Mexico R-11 Ono Island R-6 Bear Pt. R-1 Bayou St. John FLORIDA 8,0 500,000 480,000 ALABAMA olsen associates, inc. 1,020,000 1,040,000 1,060,000 1,080,000 1,100,000 1,120,000 460,000 440,000 Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, FL NAD83) (ft, Northing FY 2018-2019 Funding Request Figure 1 Location Map – Pensaco olsen associates, inc. 2 01 August 2017 4. Mapping See attached maps (1”=200’ scale), see also Figure 1. 5. Length of Area of Influence in Feet (as determined by IMP or SBMP): 39,600 ft to 50,160 ft In an inlet management study, Browder and Dean (1999) determined that the limits of influence of Pensacola Pass extend between 7.5 and 9.5 miles from the tidal entrance. 6. Schedule and Budget Table 2 ‐ LONG RANGE BUDGET PLAN Pensacola Pass Inlet Management Study and IMP Development 1‐Aug‐17 Project Category Task Total Cost Federal State Local Surveys $120,000 $0 $90,000 $30,000 Design Inlet Management Study $175,000 $0 $131,250 $43,750 Inlet Management Plan Development $120,000 $0 $90,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 2018/2019 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Monitoring $0 $0 $0 $0 2018/2019 TOTAL $415,000 $0 $311,250 $103,750 No other activities proposed until results of Study are completed. 7. Balancing the Sediment Budget: Provide a brief description of when the last sediment budget engineering analysis was completed for the inlet and area of inlet influence. Discuss any proposals to update the sediment budget: In 2008, the Department received an update to the littoral processes associated with the inlet shoal system and the adjacent shorelines. The present proposal includes an update of the inlet sediment budget and the development of an inlet management plan. A plan was last proposed in 1999 (Browder and Dean, 1999, not adopted as an official IMP). This request proposes to conduct a thorough update survey, an update to the inlet sediment budget and the development of a proposed Inlet Management Plan. What is the annual bypassing objective (cubic yards/year) adopted by the IMP or the SMBP or as determined by a department approved study? This request proposes to update the sediment budget and determine an appropriate value for the annual bypassing objective. Browder and Dean (1999) suggest that shoaling rates in the inlet may exceed 300,000 cy/yr, while the NET longshore transport in the area might be 70,000 cy/yr. These values need updating. The SBMP for Pensacola Pass cites the same 1999 report and values. Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, FL olsen associates, inc. FY 2018-2019 Funding Request 3 01 August 2017 Provide the current annual average of bypassed material (cubic yards) since adoption of a bypass objective: This request proposes to update the sediment budget and update the recent dredging and disposal values. There is no adopted bypass objective as of this writing. Since 2011, approximately 750,000 cy have been dredged from the channel via USACE channel maintenance, with sand placed along the beach, in the nearshore, and within the swash zone of Perdido Key. These values need updating. Attach an updated list of the annual bypassing volumes (cubic yards/year) for the inlet for the past 10 years (starting from the last calendar year or the most recent calculation). 2011/2012: 520,000 cy dredged 2016: 230,000 cy dredged 750,000 cy dredged and placed on Perdido Key over roughly a 10-yr period, equates to 75,000 cy/yr. This value assumes the placed sand is effectively bypassed (likely not the case). The true bypassed value is likely lower than that. The proposed study intends to refine and update these values. 8. Sand Reaching the Inlet: Provide the current estimated annual quantity of beach quality sand reaching the updrift boundary of the improved jetty or inlet channel: This request proposes to update the sediment budget and determine an appropriate value for the volume of sand reaching the inlet each year. Browder and Dean (1999) suggest that the value might be on the order of 87,500 cy/yr. This value needs updating. 9. Cost Effective Alternatives: Provide the estimated bypassing shortfall of sand (cubic yards/year) within in the inlet system: TO BE DETERMINED. Browder and Dean suggest the value could be on the order of 150,000 to 200,000 cy/yr Provide the increase in annual bypassing of sand (cubic yards/year) proposed for this project: TO BE DETERMINED. From the discussion above, Browder and Dean suggest the value could be on the order of 125,000 to 200,000 cy/yr (assuming somewhere between 0 and 75,000 cy/yr are effectively bypassed. These values need updating. Pensacola Pass, Escambia County, FL olsen associates, inc. FY 2018-2019 Funding Request 4 01 August 2017 10. Local Sponsor Financial and Administrative Commitment Is funding for the project in local sponsor’s 10-year comprehensive financial plan (Y/N)? NO Attach a copy of provide a web link to the plan. n/a Is funding provided through a source established by referendum (Y/N)? NO Attach a copy of provide a web link to the plan. n/a Is funding provided by a third party other than the Federal Government (Y/N)? NO What is the percentage of total project costs provide by the third party? 0% Attach a copy of the interlocal agreement or cost-sharing agreement. n/a Quarterly Report Compliance (NO GRANT): Quarter Due Date Report Remit (approx.) Compliant (yes/no) July-September October 30 NO October-December January 31 NO January-March April 30 NO March-June July 31 NO Is there an active Federal permit for the project? YES Federal Civil Works project, refer to State permit for Water Quality Certification Is there an active State permit for the project? YES State permit #: JCP #0295379-005-JC (and mods) Authorization date: 09 December 2010 Expiration date: 09 December 2025 [USACE (shallower) CHANNEL PERMIT for dredging
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 SPBO (Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion)
    nited States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 133920” Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Service Log Number: 41910-201 1-F-0170 March 13, 2015 Alan M. Dodd, Colonel District Commander U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 701 San Marco Boulevard, Room 372 Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8175 Dear Colonel Dodd: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s revised Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion (SPBO) for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Civil Works and Regulatory sand placement activities in Florida and their effects on the following sea turtles: Northwest Atlantic Ocean distinct population segment (NWAO DPS) of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and its designated terrestrial critical habitat; green (Chelonia mydas); leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea); hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata); and Kemp’s ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) ; and the following beach mice: southeastern (Peromyscus polionotus niveiventris); Anastasia Island (Peromyscus polionotus phasma); Choctawhatchee (Peromyscus polionotus allophrys); St. Andrews (Peromyscus polionotus peninsutaris); and Perdido Key (Peromyscus polionotus trissyllepsis) and their designated critical habitat. It does not address effects of these activities on the non-breeding piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and its designated critical habitat or for the red knot (Calidris canutus rufa). Effects of Corps planning and regulatory shore protection activities on the non-breeding piping plover and its designated critical habitat within the North Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility and the South Florida Ecological Services office area of responsibility are addressed in the Service’s May 22, 2013, Programmatic Piping Plover Biological Opinion. Effects of shore protection activities for the piping plover in the Panama City Ecological Services office area of responsibility will be addressed on a project by project basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents VOLUME I
    PENSACOLA, FLORIDA The Search for the Hidden People of St. Michael ’s Cemetery VOLUME I Lists of Figures, Tables and Appendices; Acknowledgments; Chapters I-IX Cryptic Message #2. David S. Hinks. Courtesy of the Arts Council of Northwest Florida Margo S. Stringfield, Stuart Hamilton, Johan Liebens, Jay K. Johnson, Bryan S. Haley, Aaron Fogle, Kendra Kennedy, Siska Williams with contributions by Elizabeth D. Benchley University of West Florida Archaeology Institute Report of Investigations Number 158 December 2008 Funded in part by the State of Florida, Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, assisted by the Florida Historical Commission Table of Contents VOLUME I: List of Figures v List of Tables xiv List of Appendices xv Acknowledgments xvii Abstract xx Chapter I Introduction 1 Chapter II Environmental Setting 3 Physiography and Geology Drainage Characteristics Climate Flora Fauna Project Setting Summary Chapter III Archaeological and Historical Settings 9 Previous Research Historic Chronology Chapter IV Project Design and Methods 18 The Research Team Testing Methodology for the Project Chapter V A Discussion of the Transformational Funerary Landscape 26 Margo Stringfield Interments at Santa Maria de Galve and Isla de Santa Rosa Pensacola (1698-1757) Re-establishment on the Mainland: San Miguel de Penzacola (ca 1754-1763) A Proper Town: British Pensacola (1763-1781) A Community Cemetery is Defined The Return of Spanish Rule: 1781 Chapter VI St. Michael’s Cemetery: A Formal Identity 69 Margo Stringfield Spatial landscape of St. Michael’s Cemetery A Democracy of the Dead Landscape Changes and Urban Growth Community Stewardship at the Turn of the 21st Century Summary Chapter VII St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Pensacola
    Ecology of Pensacola Bay Chapter 1 - Environmental Setting Britta Hays Introduction: The climate, morphology and hydrodynamics of Pensacola Bay and its watershed greatly influences the presence and abundance of biological communities within the bay. Biological communities such as phytoplankton, seagrasses, marshes, zooplankton, benthos and fish respond to climate and hydrodynamic forcing. Climate: Pensacola Bay has a humid subtropical climate with generally warm temperatures (Thorpe et. al 1997). There is an average temperature of 11° C occurring in the coldest month, January, while the warmest months are July and August with an average temperature of 29° C. Winds are normally from the north/northwest in the fall and winter and the south/southwest in spring and summer. Annual rainfall varies from month to month and is heaviest in April, September and October and lightest in January, May and June. Annual precipitation ranges from 73-228 cm. The wettest years were 2005 and 2009 while the driest year was 2006. The warmest year was 2006 and the coolest was 2004 (NOAA). Hurricanes influence the area occasionally; the last major hurricanes were Ivan in 2004 and Dennis in 2005 which caused a great deal of damage to the area. The pattern of hurricane occurrence is about every five to ten years: Eloise(1975), Fredrick (1979), Elena (1985), Opal (1995), Ivan (2004), Dennis (2005) (NOAA). Figure 1-1. Average precipitation (cm) and temperature (° C) (NOAA) Month 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Jan 10.67 13.05 14.44 11.72 10.33 11.83 Feb 10.95 14.33 12.44 11.67 13.44 12.28 March 17.50 15.33 17.39 17.28 15.22 16.94 April 18.61 18.17 22.28 18.83 19.56 18.89 May 18.44 23.22 24.39 23.72 24.22 24.33 June 24.11 26.72 28.17 27.56 28.44 28.33 July 26.72 28.17 28.72 27.89 29.00 27.67 Aug 27.72 27.89 28.28 29.39 28.39 26.78 Sept 26.78 27.83 25.50 26.89 26.22 26.22 Oct 26.17 21.22 20.61 22.11 20.00 21.50 Nov 17.83 17.33 14.72 15.72 14.83 15.33 Dec 11.11 11.44 13.06 14.72 13.94 10.94 Table 1-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay
    Pensacola Bay By Lisa Schwenning,1 Traci Bruce,1 and Lawrence R. Handley2 Background during the early to mid-1950s (Northwest Florida Water Management District, 1991). The Pensacola Bay system (fig. 1) has historically Predominant land uses within the riverine watershed supported a rich and diverse ecology, productive fisheries, and include forestry, agriculture, military, and public conservation considerable recreational opportunities. It has also provided and recreation, as well as residential and other urban land uses an important resource for commercial shipping and military around several communities. Much of the economic base of activities and has enhanced area aesthetics and property this area is provided by the extraction of natural resources, values. Unfortunately, for many years, point and nonpoint primarily timber and agriculture, but there are also indirect source pollution, direct habitat destruction, and the cumulative economic benefits provided by military activities and the impacts of development and other activities throughout service sector. Major public landholdings include portions the watershed have combined to degrade the health and of Eglin Air Force Base, Blackwater River State Forest productivity of much of the Pensacola Bay system (Northwest (Northwest Florida Water Management District, 1997), and Florida Water Management District, 1997). water management district lands along the Escambia and During the 1800s and early 1900s, extensive logging Blackwater Rivers. of hardwood trees occurred on tributaries entering the Population growth and development apply the greatest Pensacola Bay system (Rucker, 1990). Historically, it is pressure to the environment of Florida’s coastal areas. likely that the timber industry adversely impacted the upper As population increases, so do the demands on coastal bays of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Restore Visitor Access to Fort Pickens Area
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Gulf Islands National Seashore DRAFT Environmental Assessment ___ Restore Visitor Access to Fort Pickens Area, Santa Rosa Island October, 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Draft Environmental Assessment: Restore Visitor Access to Fort Pickens Area, Santa Rosa Island Gulf Islands National Seashore Escambia County, Florida October 2006 Summary The National Park Service (NPS) proposes to restore public access to the Fort Pickens Area of Gulf Islands National Seashore (GUIS) to pre-Hurricane Ivan levels. Access to this portion of the park has been severely limited since the Fort Pickens Road was destroyed in 2004 and 2005 by Hurricanes Ivan and Dennis. The Fort Pickens Road is approximately 7miles long and connects Pensacola Beach with Fort Pickens, a listed National Historic District. It has been closed to vehicular traffic since September 2004. Over 700,000 visitors access Fort Pickens Area each year. The Fort Pickens Area is about 1740 acres in area. This environmental assessment analyzes potential impacts to the human environment resulting from five alternative courses of action. These alternatives are: Alternative A (No action); Alternative B (Provide Access via Alternative Transportation (i.e., a passenger ferry); Alternative C (Reconstruct Fort Pickens Road with Protective Sand Berms); Alternative D (Reconstruct Fort Pickens Road with a Mix of Protective Elements), and Alternative E (Reconstruct Fort Pickens Road in Conjunction with Beach Renourishment and Dune Enhancement). Alternative A is the environmentally preferred alternative. Alternative D is the NPS preferred alternative. The impacts from alternatives B, C, D, and E range from negligible to moderate.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay Watershed Restoration (PDF)
    Council Member Applicant and Proposal Information Summary Sheet Point of Contact: Phil Coram Phone: 850-245-2167 Council Member: State of Florida Email: [email protected] Project Identification Project Title: Pensacola Bay Watershed Restoration Project State(s): Florida County/City/Region: Escambia and Santa Rosa General Location: Projects must be located within the Gulf Coast Region as defined in RESTORE Act. (attach map or photos, if applicable) Pensacola Bay Watershed within Florida Project Description RESTORE Goals: Identify all RESTORE Act goals this project supports. Place a P for Primary Goal, and S for secondary goals. S Restore and Conserve Habitat S Replenish and Protect Living Coastal and Marine Resources P Restore Water Quality S Enhance Community Resilience S Restore and Revitalize the Gulf Economy RESTORE Objectives: Identify all RESTORE Act objectives this project supports. Place a P for Primary Objective, and S for secondary objectives. S Restore, Enhance, and Protect Habitats S Promote Community Resilience P Restore, Improve, and Protect Water Resources S Promote Natural Resource Stewardship and S Protect and Restore Living Coastal and Marine Resources S Environmental Education S Restore and Enhance Natural Processes and Shorelines S Improve Science-Based Decision-Making Processes RESTORE Priorities: Identify all RESTORE Act priorities that this project supports. X Priority 1: Projects that are projected to make the greatest contribution X Priority 2: Large-scale projects and programs that are projected to substantially contribute to restoring X Priority 3: Projects contained in existing Gulf Coast State comprehensive plans for the restoration …. X Priority 4: Projects that restore long-term resiliency of the natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries … RESTORE Commitments: Identify all RESTORE Comprehensive Plan commitments that this project supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-06 Northwest Florida Water Management District Pensacola Bay System Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-06 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 www.nwfwater.com Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director, and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT DESCRIPTION This Project Restored an Area of Beach Where Oiling and the Extensive Use of All-Terrain Equipment Had Inhib
    ESCAMBIA COUNTY PROJECTS - DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (NRDA) – PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project restored an area of beach where oiling and the extensive use of all-terrain equipment had inhibited plant growth and prevented the natural seaward expansion of dunes. Primary dunes are the first line of natural defense for coastal Florida to prevent the loss of wildlife and property due to Figure 1: (Left) Contractors adding protective snow fences. (Right) Contractors planting new sea oats. storms, oil spills and other threats. The restoration location is from the Western boundary of Pensacola Source: http://www.restoration.noaa.gov/dwh/storymap/ Beach (7.5 miles east of Pensacola Pass) and progressed approximately 8.1 miles east. This PROJECT DETAILS restoration project consisted of planting appropriate Total Funding Allocated: $644,487 dune vegetation approximately 40 feet seaward of Status: Complete existing dunes allowing for a living shoreline. BEFORE AFTER PENSACOLA BEACH DUNE RESTORATION www.myescambia.com/RESTORE ESCAMBIA COUNTY PROJECTS - DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (NRDA) – PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project provides boaters enhanced access to public waterways within Pensacola Bay and offshore areas and addresses the reduced quality and quantity of recreational activities (e.g., boating and fishing) in Florida attributable to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and response activities. Mahogany Mill Public Boat Ramp is a newly constructed boat ramp and park that provides many environmental benefits and improved access to Pensacola Bay. The Mahogany Mill Boat Ramp site had long been associated with pollution and contaminates. It was built using various eco-friendly materials on a 2.82 acre parcel that features a public boat ramp with multiple lanes, public gazebo, Figure 1: (Bottom & Top) Construction beginning at the boat ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Watershed Characterization
    f1004401.0003.02 Draft Pensacola Bay System Surface Watershed Characterization December 2016 Prepared by: Pensacola Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This document was developed in support of the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program with funding assistance from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. ii Pensacola Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Version History Location(s) in Date Version Summary of Revision(s) Document Initial draft Watershed Characterization (Sections 1, 2, 3, 09/23/2016 1 All 4, and 6) submitted to NWFWMD. 10/18/2016 2 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff. 11/10/2016 3 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. 11/23/2016 4 Throughout Numerous edits and comments from District staff. 12/8/2016 5 Throughout Numerous revisions to address District comments. L:\Publications\4200-4499\4401-0001_NWFWD iii Pensacola Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT This page intentionally left blank. iv Pensacola Bay Watershed Characterization Northwest Florida Water Management District December 8, 2016 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 SWIM Program Background, Goals,
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Intensifies; Obama Visits
    GRAY WON’T RUN GULF BREEZE HOSPITAL TURNS 25 School Board veteran plans to step down Dignitaries break ground on $5 million expansion project COMMUNITY, 3C COMMUNITY, 2A 50¢ YOUR COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER June 17, 2010 CRUDE AWAKENING Week 8 ‘Assault on our Oil intensifies; Obama visits shores’ will be Officials aim “The good news is there doesn’t to improve fought vigorously seem to have been any new oil In the days since the BP oil spill began, coming in Tuesday. The bad news is response to the failure to stop the leak has caused that what is already in here could be incredible anger and frustration – especial- oil impacts ly for the people of the Gulf Coast strug- drifting around all summer.” gling to survive one of the worst environ- – Marco White BY SCOTT PAGE mental disasters in our nation’s history. Gulf Breeze News On Tuesday I visited Pensacola Beach, [email protected] and during the last few weeks I’ve been to the Gulf and met with people directly As President Obama visited impacted by this tragedy. I’ve heard sto- Pensacola Beach on Tuesday, ries from oystermen and shrimpers who state, local and BP officials are wondering where their next paycheck escalated response efforts to will come from. I’ve met business owners cope with intensified oil impacts who are seeing revenue dry up as the along the Northwest Florida number of tourists decline. And I’ve talked coastline. with Americans young and old who are “We’re going to be doing afraid that the ecosystem that has played everything we can – make sure such an important role in their lives will that there are skimmers out, there be damaged beyond repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Escambia County Projects - Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
    ESCAMBIA COUNTY PROJECTS - DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (NRDA) – PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project restored an area of beach where oiling and the extensive use of all-terrain equipment had inhibited plant growth and prevented the natural seaward expansion of dunes. Primary dunes are the first line of natural defense for coastal Florida to prevent the loss of wildlife and property due to Figure 1: (Left) Contractors adding protective snow fences. (Right) Contractors planting new sea oats. storms, oil spills and other threats. The restoration location is from the Western boundary of Pensacola Source: http://www.restoration.noaa.gov/dwh/storymap/ Beach (7.5 miles east of Pensacola Pass) and progressed approximately 8.1 miles east. This PROJECT DETAILS restoration project consisted of planting appropriate Total Funding Allocated: $644,487 dune vegetation approximately 40 feet seaward of Status: Complete existing dunes allowing for a living shoreline. BEFORE AFTER PENSACOLA BEACH DUNE RESTORATION www.myescambia.com/RESTORE ESCAMBIA COUNTY PROJECTS - DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL SPILL NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT (NRDA) – PHASE I PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project provides boaters enhanced access to public waterways within Pensacola Bay and offshore areas and addresses the reduced quality and quantity of recreational activities (e.g., boating and fishing) in Florida attributable to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and response activities. Mahogany Mill Public Boat Ramp is a newly constructed boat ramp and park that provides many environmental benefits and improved access to Pensacola Bay. The Mahogany Mill Boat Ramp site had long been associated with pollution and contaminates. It was built using various eco-friendly materials on a 2.82 acre parcel that features a public boat ramp with multiple lanes, public gazebo, Figure 1: (Bottom & Top) Construction beginning at the boat ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Bayous: the Maritime Cultural Landscape
    BETWEEN THE BAYOUS: THE MARITIME CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF THE DOWNTOWN PENSACOLA WATERFRONT by Kendra Ann Kennedy B.A., University of Notre Dame, 2002 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts and Sciences The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2010 2010 Kendra Ann Kennedy The thesis of Kendra Ann Kennedy is approved: ____________________________________________ _________________ Elizabeth D. Benchley, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Amy M. Mitchell-Cook, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Gregory D. Cook, M.A., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean of Graduate Studies Date ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this study of the Pensacola waterfront, including the fieldwork and archival research that went into its preparation, has been simultaneously stimulating and nerve wracking. Without the support of family, friends, professors, colleagues, and benefactors, its completion would simply not have been possible. For that reason, I wish to thank the many individuals who assisted during the course of this project. First and foremost, I owe a debt of gratitude to Hal and Pat Marcus, generous founders and supporters of the Marcus Fellowship in Historical Archaeology, which provided the financial assistance that allowed me to complete the writing of this thesis. Thank you also to Dr. Judith Bense, University of West Florida (UWF) president and staunch supporter of archaeology in Northwest Florida, for accepting me into the Historical Archaeology program and finding ways to provide financial assistance and support.
    [Show full text]