DOCSLIB.ORG

Pensacola Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pensacola Bay Pensacola Bay By Lisa Schwenning,1 Traci Bruce,1 and Lawrence R. Handley2 Background during the early to mid-1950s (Northwest Florida Water Management District, 1991). The Pensacola Bay system (fig. 1) has historically Predominant land uses within the riverine watershed supported a rich and diverse ecology, productive fisheries, and include forestry, agriculture, military, and public conservation considerable recreational opportunities. It has also provided and recreation, as well as residential and other urban land uses an important resource for commercial shipping and military around several communities. Much of the economic base of activities and has enhanced area aesthetics and property this area is provided by the extraction of natural resources, values. Unfortunately, for many years, point and nonpoint primarily timber and agriculture, but there are also indirect source pollution, direct habitat destruction, and the cumulative economic benefits provided by military activities and the impacts of development and other activities throughout service sector. Major public landholdings include portions the watershed have combined to degrade the health and of Eglin Air Force Base, Blackwater River State Forest productivity of much of the Pensacola Bay system (Northwest (Northwest Florida Water Management District, 1997), and Florida Water Management District, 1997). water management district lands along the Escambia and During the 1800s and early 1900s, extensive logging Blackwater Rivers. of hardwood trees occurred on tributaries entering the Population growth and development apply the greatest Pensacola Bay system (Rucker, 1990). Historically, it is pressure to the environment of Florida’s coastal areas. likely that the timber industry adversely impacted the upper As population increases, so do the demands on coastal bays of the system. Blackwater Bay and lower reaches of the resources. Over 75% of Florida’s residents live in coastal Blackwater River and Pond Creek were covered with sawdust counties, and a 50% increase is estimated by 2020 (Florida from mills in Bagdad, Fla. Sawn timber and sawdust are Department of Environmental Protection, 1998). In the three rich in turpines and other toxic substances. During logging counties included in the Florida portion of the Pensacola Bay operations, turbidity, nutrient concentrations, biological watershed, there has been a 220% increase in population since oxygen demand, and chemical oxygen demand were probably 1960. As a result of the population increase, there has been a high, and dissolved oxygen levels were probably low. Benthic dramatic change in land use of the Pensacola Bay area from communities may have been scarce or nonexistent while the agricultural to urban. Escambia County alone lost 13,247 ha mills were operating at peak levels (Northwest Florida Water (32,732 acres) of agricultural lands between 1992 and 1997; Management District, 1991). during the same time, the county gained approximately 6,071 Barge traffic and log rafting from tributaries to the Port ha (15,000 acres) of urban land use. of Pensacola unquestionably resuspended fine sediments in shoal areas of the system. Fairly extensive dredging of the Blackwater River was authorized and completed in 1916 Scope of Area by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1990). Moskovits (1955) reported general silting problems in Pensacola Bay The Pensacola Bay system consists of about 50,992 ha during 1949–50, as well as settlement of fouling organisms (126,000 acres), including its coastline of 885 km (550 mi) (barnacles, serpulid worms, hydroids, bryozoans, sponges, and open surface waters of about 373 km2 (144 mi2). The jingle shells, and Mytilus sp.) on artificial substrata. watershed covers nearly 18,130 km2 (7,000 mi2). The final These organisms tend to settle in relatively clear water, outlet for the system is the Gulf of Mexico at the mouth of so the presence of these animals suggests that suspended Pensacola Bay. The watershed of the Pensacola Bay system sediment loads were not sufficient to inhibit the settlement includes many different counties, cities, and incorporations. of zooplankton and that water quality may have been better Approximately 65% of the entire watershed is located outside of Florida State lines; Alabama counties—including portions of Covington, Escambia, Conecuh, Butler, Crenshaw, Pike, 2 1 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Northwest District. Bullock, Montgomery, and Coffee—make up 11,632 km 2 U.S. Geological Survey. 130 Seagrass Status and Trends in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: 1940–2002 65 r e iv R uh ec on C Interstate highway River Gulf Intracoastal Waterway County line Pensacola Bay Watershed boundary City r e v i R a i b m a r c r R ive s ate E kw c er la iv B R w llo Y e 10 r Ferry Pass e i v y R E a st B a Pensacola Fort Walton Beach Pensacola Bay N km 0 10 20 30 40 Gulf of Mexico mi 0 5 10 15 20 25 Figure 1. Watershed for the Pensacola Bay system. Methodology Employed To Determine and Document Current Status 131 (4,491 mi2) of the Pensacola Bay system (Florida Department Santa Rosa Sound of Environmental Protection, 1998). Approximately 857 km2 (331 mi2) (45%) of Escambia Santa Rosa Sound is oriented west to east and connects County form the western portion of the Pensacola Bay Choctawhatchee and Pensacola Bays. It is bordered on the watershed. Nearly all of the 2,631 km2 (1,016 mi2) of south by Santa Rosa Island and on the north by the Gulf Santa Rosa County, located to the east, are included in the Breeze Peninsula. watershed. Seventy-five percent of Okaloosa County (1,940 km2, or 749 mi2) lies in the watershed. Within Okaloosa County are the Yellow and Shoal Rivers, their tributaries, and the other half of Santa Rosa Sound. Only 648 km2 (250 mi2) Methodology Employed To Determine (20%) of Walton County drain into the Pensacola Bay system and contain a portion of the Shoal River and tributaries. and Document Current Status The western portion of the basin is predominantly urban, whereas the eastern portion is primarily low density, rural, The most current mapping study of seagrass coverage for and undeveloped. the Pensacola Bay area was conducted more than 10 yr ago The Pensacola Bay system has been divided into five by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Wetlands segments: Escambia Bay, East Bay, Pensacola Bay proper, Big Research Center (NWRC) by using natural-color aerial Lagoon, and Santa Rosa Sound (fig. 2). photography taken in 1992 at a 1:24,000 scale as part of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico seagrass mapping project. The mapping protocol consisted of stereoscopic Escambia Bay photointerpretation, cartographic transfer, and digitization in accordance with strict mapping standards and Escambia Bay may be the most vulnerable of the Pensacola Bay segments. It is located north of the line conventions.Other important aspects of the protocol between Garcon Point to the east and Magnolia Point to the included the development of a seagrass classification west. Escambia Bay is commonly divided into upper and system, groundtruthing, quality control, and peer review. lower parts, with Interstate 10 delineating the boundary. This The information derived from the photography was dividing line falls in an area that divides species between subsequently transferred by using a zoom transfer scope the dominant brackish water plant water celery (Vallisneria onto a stable medium overlaying USGS 1:24,000-scale americana) in the upper bay and the dominant seagrass shoal quadrangle base maps. The primary data source was grass (Halodule wrightii) in the lower part of the bay. 1:24,000-scale natural color aerial photography flown by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stennis East Bay Space Center in fall 1992. In those cases where the data were inadequate or incomplete, contemporary supplemental East Bay is located east of the line between Garcon Point data were acquired from other sources and used to complete and Redfish Cove. East Bay, like Escambia Bay, is commonly the photographic coverage. divided into upper and lower segments, but with Robinson The seagrass classification system that was developed Point delineating the boundary. The area north of Robinson (see appendix for full discussion) consisted of two classes of Point harbors all brackish water submerged aquatic vegetation. open water—RIV (riverine, fresh water) and EST (estuarine The area south of Robinson Point, or East Bay proper, contains or marine open water)—and five classes of seagrass habitats. shoal grass and turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum). One seagrass habitat class is continuous seagrass, CSG, for which no density distinction was made. The other four classes Pensacola Bay are patchy seagrass based on percent ground cover of patches in 5% increments: PSG1 (0%–10%, very sparse), PSG2 Pensacola Bay is west of the Garcon Point Bridge. (15%–40%, sparse), PSG3 (45%–70%, moderate), and PSG4 Escambia and East Bays drain into Pensacola Bay, along with (75%–95%, dense). Bayous Texar, Chico, and Grande. Pensacola Bay empties into The groundtruthing phase included the participation of the Gulf of Mexico at the Pensacola Pass. field staff from Gulf Islands National Seashore, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Mississippi Big Lagoon State University, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, and Florida Department of Environmental Big Lagoon is oriented west to east and connects lower Protection. Draft maps were sent out to these agencies Perdido and Pensacola
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida Audubon Naturalist Summer 2021
    Naturalist Summer 2021 Female Snail Kite. Photo: Nancy Elwood Heidi McCree, Board Chair 2021 Florida Audubon What a privilege to serve as the newly-elected Chair of the Society Leadership Audubon Florida Board. It is an honor to be associated with Audubon Florida’s work and together, we will continue to Executive Director address the important issues and achieve our mission to protect Julie Wraithmell birds and the places they need. We send a huge thank you to our outgoing Chair, Jud Laird, for his amazing work and Board of Directors leadership — the birds are better off because of your efforts! Summer is here! Locals and visitors alike enjoy sun, the beach, and Florida’s amazing Chair waterways. Our beaches are alive with nesting sea and shorebirds, and across the Heidi McCree Everglades we are wrapping up a busy wading bird breeding season. At the Center Vice-Chair for Birds of Prey, more than 200 raptor chicks crossed our threshold — and we Carol Colman Timmis released more than half back to the wild. As Audubon Florida’s newest Board Chair, I see the nesting season as a time to celebrate the resilience of birds, while looking Treasurer forward to how we can protect them into the migration season and beyond. We Scott Taylor will work with state agencies to make sure the high levels of conservation funding Secretary turn into real wins for both wildlife and communities (pg. 8). We will forge new Lida Rodriguez-Taseff partnerships to protect Lake Okeechobee and the Snail Kites that nest there (pg. 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay Bridge
    Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1074 Highway 90 ANANTH PRASAD, P.E. GOVERNOR Chipley, Florida 32428 SECRETARY July 18, 2011 Ms. Lauren P. Milligan Florida State Clearinghouse Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 RE: Advance Notification Pensacola Bay Bridge Replacement PD&E Study ETDM #: 13248 From: 17th Avenue in Pensacola to Baybridge Drive in Gulf Breeze Federal Aid Project Number: 4221 078 P Financial Project ID Number: 409334-1-22-02 Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Dear Ms. Milligan: We are sending this Advance Notification (AN) Package to your office for distribution to State agencies that conduct Federal consistency reviews (consistency reviewers) in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act and Presidential Executive Order 12372. We are also distributing the AN Package to local and Federal agencies. Although we will request specific comments during the permitting process, we are asking that permitting and permit reviewing agencies (consistency reviewers) review the attached information and provide us with their comments. This is a Federal-aid action and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), will determine what type of environmental documentation will be necessary. The determination will be based upon in-house environmental evaluations and comments from other agencies. Please provide a consistency review for this project in accordance with the State’s Coastal Zone Management Program. www.dot.state.fl.us In addition, please review the project’s consistency, to the maximum extent feasible, with the approved Comprehensive Plan of the local government to comply with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackwater River State Park Was Established 7720 Deaton Bridge Road in 1967 and Opened in 1968 with 360 Acres
    BLACKWATER RIVER HISTORY AND NATURE STATE PARK Blackwater River State Park was established 7720 Deaton Bridge Road in 1967 and opened in 1968 with 360 acres. In 1981 an additional 230 acres were acquired from Holt, FL 32564 the Division of Forestry. 850-983-5363 Blackwater River State Park has one recorded archaeological site–an unnamed stone scatter, which may be as old as 10,000 years or as PARK GUIDELINES recent as a few hundred years old. Since rivers • Hours are 8 a.m. until sunset, 365 days a year. have been major transportation corridors in • An entrance fee is required. Additional user fees Florida for more than 10,000 years, it is probable may apply. BLACKWATER that human activity existed here long ago. • All plants, animals and park property are protected. Collection, destruction or disturbance RIVER The park and adjoining Blackwater River is prohibited. State Forest are known for their historic trams, • Pets are permitted in designated areas only. Pets STATE PARK sawmills and timber industry, especially near Milton. must be kept on a handheld leash no longer It is interesting to note the geographical distribution than six feet and well-behaved at all times. of mills along the streams and watersheds. • Fishing, boating and ground fires are allowed in designated areas only. A Florida fishing licences When mills were at peak operation, everyone is require.. Fireworks and hunting are prohibited made trips to mills. The earliest roads led to in all Florida state parks. mills and as the community grew, commercial • Fireworks and hunting are prohibited. ventures such as the blacksmith shop, livery and • Alcoholic beverage consumption is allowed in general store would spring up nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Escambia County, Florida
    United States In cooperation with Department of the University of Florida, Agriculture Institute of Food and Soil Survey of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Agricultural Experiment Escambia County, Resources Stations, and Soil and Water Conservation Science Department; and the Service Florida Department of Florida Agriculture and Consumer Services How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMATION PROCESSES of SHIP SITES in the BLACKWATER RIVER, SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA by William Joseph Wilson, II B.S., Kennes
    FORMATION PROCESSES OF SHIP SITES IN THE BLACKWATER RIVER, SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA by William Joseph Wilson, II B.S., Kennesaw State University, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology College of Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities The University of West Florida In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2015 © 2015 William Joseph Wilson, II The thesis of William Joseph Wilson, II is approved: ____________________________________________ _________________ Della Scott-Ireton, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Robert Philen, Ph.D., Committee Member Date ____________________________________________ _________________ Gregory D. Cook, Ph.D., Committee Chair Date Accepted for the Department/Division: ____________________________________________ _________________ John R. Bratten, Ph.D., Chair Date Accepted for the University: ____________________________________________ _________________ Richard S. Podemski, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School Date ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people contributed to the success of this project. I would like to thank Dr. Greg Cook, Dr. Robert Philen, and Dr. Della Scott-Ireton for assistance and guidance through the thesis process. The University of West Florida Archaeology Institute provided financial support and materials to complete much of the field work. I would also like to thank Dr. Matthew Schwartz and Dr. Jane Caffrey for providing assistance and equipment from their departments. Steve McLin, Fritz Sharar, and Del De Los Santos ensured that all boat and diving operations went smoothly and safely. Many others within the Department of Anthropology provided guidance, including Dr. Ramie Gougeon, Dr. John Bratten, Dr. John Worth, Janet Lloyd, Jennifer Melcher, Norine Carroll, John Phillips, Cindy Rogers, and Juliette Moore. The field work could not have been completed without the assistance of all the field school supervisors and students during the 2013 field season, particularly Andrew Derlikowski.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2020 Newsletter
    October 2020 FRIENDS OF BLACKWATER ©Kent Mason Working to protect West Virginia’s HigH allegHenies, BlackWater riVer & BlackWater canyon. PO Box 247 - Thomas, WV 26292 - phone: 304-345-7663 - www.saveblackwater.org - [email protected] Meet Friends of Blackwaters’ New Heritage Vista Member Alicia Erjavec! Hello, Friends of Blackwater supporters. My name is Alicia Erjavec. I grew up in Clarksburg and graduated from Robert C. Byrd High School in 2015. This past De- cember I graduated from Fairmont State University with a Bachelor of Arts in English Literature and a minor in Folklore Studies. At Fairmont State I worked on the Appalachian Teaching Project (“ATP”), which is an applied research training program for college students in Appalachia to design economic development initiatives for their com- munities. The goal was to design and lead research proj- ects in Appalachian communities in order to address the challenges that are currently going on in their respective region. I worked with supervisors Lynette Swiger of Fair- mont State and Connie Boggs of Monongah Elementary, with two other students, Christina Satterfield and Garret Alicia, our New Vista! Wilson, learning about the coal towns of Marion County and the tri-state area, and about the rail trail that goes The opportunity to work as an Americorps VISTA for through Fairmont. At the end of the course, we traveled Friends of Blackwater came through my old advisor at to Washington D.C. for a press confernce, presenting Fairmont State, and seeing that it was similar to what I our work to other student delegations, the leaders of the did for the ATP, I couldn’t pass up the chance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Francis M. Weston Audubon Society Blackwater River State Forest Bird Survey Peggy Baker
    Spring 2013 April-June Vol. XL No. 4 The Francis M. Weston Audubon Society Blackwater River State Forest Bird Survey Peggy Baker Blackwater River State Forest has been designated The food plots planted for game wildlife also attracted by the National Audubon as an Important Bird great numbers of wintering Chipping and Vesper Area with a global priority (the highest). This Sparrows, as well as Palm, Pine and Yellow-rumped designation means this area in Northwest Florida is vital to Warblers. birds and other biodiversity. It provides essential habitat for Dead snags left standing throughout the forest have the survival of one or more species. In 2009, FMWAS attracted large numbers of woodpeckers. Along with undertook the task of surveying the birds in BRS Forest by the Red-cockaded Woodpeckers, the forest is home to conducting weekly surveys. good numbers of nesting Pileated, Red-bellied, Red- During our three-year bird survey of the 240,000 acres headed, and Downy Woodpeckers, as well as, Northern of the BRS Forest, the FMWAS team identified 181 bird Flicker. There are a good number of Yellow-bellied species. Of these, 33 species were spring and fall migrants, Sapsuckers and a few Hairy Woodpeckers during the 35 were summer visitors only, 60 were winter only, and winter season. 53 species were seen year round. And most importantly, Eastern Bluebirds have returned to nest in the natural 86 of these species nest and raise young in BRS Forest. cavities of the dead snags. Brown-headed Nuthatches are Under the Migratory Bird Program, the U. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program Restoration Council (EPA RESTORE 003 008 Cat1)
    Gulf Coast Gulf-wide Foundational Investment Ecosystem Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program Restoration Council (EPA_RESTORE_003_008_Cat1) Project Name: Gulf of Mexico Estuary Program – Planning Cost: Category 1: $2,200,000 Responsible Council Member: Environmental Protection Agency Partnering Council Member: State of Florida Project Details: This project proposes to develop and stand-up a place-based estuary program encompassing one or more of the following bays in Florida’s northwest panhandle region: Perdido Bay, Pensacola Bay, Escambia Bay, Choctawhatchee Bay, St. Andrews Bay and Apalachicola Bay. Activities: The key components of the project include establishing the host organization and hiring of key staff, developing Management and Technical committees, determining stressors and then developing and approving a Comprehensive Plan. Although this Estuary Program would be modeled after the structure and operation of National Estuary Programs (NEP) it would not be a designated NEP. This project would serve as a pilot project for the Council to consider expanding Gulf-wide when future funds become available. Environmental Benefits: If the estuary program being planned by this activity were implemented in the future, projects undertaken would directly support goals and outcomes focusing on restoring water quality, while also addressing restoration and conservation of habitat, replenishing and protecting living coastal and marine resources, enhancing community resilience and revitalizing the coastal economy. Specific actions would likely include,
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Research Related to the Potential Physical and Biological Impacts of Dredging to Channelize the Grand River
    For additional information, visit www.canr.msu.edu/outreach Summary of Research Related to the Potential Physical and Biological Impacts of Dredging to Channelize the Grand River A Working Paper, May 9, 2019 Version with appendices added November 22, 2019 Daniel M. O’Keefe, Ph.D. Michigan State University Extension Michigan Sea Grant [email protected] Introduction The Grand River Waterway proposal is not a typical harbor dredging project, but rather a river channelization project that would remove roughly 50 acres of shallow habitat through dredging portions of the Grand River in Kent and Ottawa counties. The project seeks to create a 7-foot deep channel through a 22.5-mile stretch of the Grand River between Grand Rapids and Bass River State Recreation Area near Eastmanville. The Grand River Waterway economic impact study stated that river channelization via dredging will “help return the river to its natural state” and that “increased recreational opportunities and improved water quality may generate up to 49,000 net new visitor days annually … and an annual net new economic impact of up to $5.7 million.” Research suggests that dredging will not improve water quality. A more likely scenario is reduced water quality, increased erosion of private and public land, increased deposition of sand and silt in certain areas, and harm to fish and wildlife populations. This paper deals specifically with physical and biological impacts, but it is important to note that these have economic implications, as well. The physical and biological impacts of the Grand River Waterway project would likely extend far beyond the 50 To contact an expert in your area, visit msue.anr.msu.edu/experts or call 888-MSUE4MI (888-678-3464) MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer, committed to achieving excellence through a diverse workforce and inclusive culture that encourages all people to reach their full potential.
    [Show full text]