DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Audubon Naturalist Summer 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Florida Audubon Naturalist Summer 2021 Naturalist Summer 2021 Female Snail Kite. Photo: Nancy Elwood Heidi McCree, Board Chair 2021 Florida Audubon What a privilege to serve as the newly-elected Chair of the Society Leadership Audubon Florida Board. It is an honor to be associated with Audubon Florida’s work and together, we will continue to Executive Director address the important issues and achieve our mission to protect Julie Wraithmell birds and the places they need. We send a huge thank you to our outgoing Chair, Jud Laird, for his amazing work and Board of Directors leadership — the birds are better off because of your efforts! Summer is here! Locals and visitors alike enjoy sun, the beach, and Florida’s amazing Chair waterways. Our beaches are alive with nesting sea and shorebirds, and across the Heidi McCree Everglades we are wrapping up a busy wading bird breeding season. At the Center Vice-Chair for Birds of Prey, more than 200 raptor chicks crossed our threshold — and we Carol Colman Timmis released more than half back to the wild. As Audubon Florida’s newest Board Chair, I see the nesting season as a time to celebrate the resilience of birds, while looking Treasurer forward to how we can protect them into the migration season and beyond. We Scott Taylor will work with state agencies to make sure the high levels of conservation funding Secretary turn into real wins for both wildlife and communities (pg. 8). We will forge new Lida Rodriguez-Taseff partnerships to protect Lake Okeechobee and the Snail Kites that nest there (pg. 14). We will inspire — and be inspired by — the next generation of environmental Conservation Committee Chair leaders (pg. 13). And we will continue to be grateful for your support as members, Ann Harwood-Nuss volunteers, advocates, and donors! Chapters Committee Chair Paula Wehr Heidi McCree, Chair, Audubon Florida Amy Albury Jim Brady Julie Wraithmell, Steve Buczynski Paul Ferber Executive Directer, Audubon Florida Kirsten Hines The world is opening back up again. We are birding together, Lois Kelley Amy Koch meeting with elected officials and policymakers, and welcoming Ron Magill field trip and education program participants back to the Center Brian Miller for Birds of Prey and Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary. Through it all, Steve Nellis birds have been with us, and millions of people across the country have fallen in love Douglas Pitts Jr. with the backyard species that teach us so much about the natural world. Alex Preisser Frank Santelli Dan Savercool But as the country re-opens human impacts on birds have escalated; from the flushing Mary Jean Yon of seabird colonies on our beaches to the algal blooms that remind us that we all need Kristine Young to reduce nutrients entering our waterways. At Audubon, we continue to work with individuals and agencies to hold people accountable while encouraging everyone Emeritus to enjoy the unique bird species that make Florida so special. After an intense Joe Ambrozy Sandy Batchelor Florida Legislative Session, we are encouraged that high levels of funding have been John Flanigan, Esq appropriated to restoration programs — including in the Everglades — as well as to Jud Laird land conservation initiatives that give birds and wildlife more protected space. Steve Lynch Michael Sheridan We need your voice now more than ever. If you haven’t already, subscribe to our electronic newsletters and alerts to stay up to date on upcoming training opportunities, action alerts, and success stories. We hope to see you at one of our Assembly meetings this fall! Find out more on page 3. Subscribe to Our Electronic Newsletters and Alerts: Julie Wraithmell, Executive Director, Audubon Florida FL.Audubon.org/stayintouch 2 Audubon Florida REGISTER NOW 2021 Audubon Assembly Natural Climate Solutions This year’s Assembly will include a month of in-person regional and virtual activities, so save the dates! Keynote and chapters celebration will be online, and three regional one-day, in-person events will be held in North, Central, and Southwest Florida. OCTOBER 23, UF/IFAS North Florida Research and Education Center - Suwanne Valley in Live Oak OCTOBER 30, Audubon Center for Birds of Prey in Maitland NOVEMBER 6, Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary in Naples The three events will be tied together with virtual presentations on Audubon and chapter successes, setting the conservation agenda for 2022, a workshop, and a final keynote on November 9. Join us for one event, all three, or just online! We can’t wait to see you in person or virtually. Visit FL.Audubon.org/Assembly for updates and registration details. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING of the membership of The Florida Audubon Society. Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, notice is hereby given that the Annual Membership Meeting of the Florida Audubon Society will be held at 9 a.m. on Saturday, October 30, 2021. The meeting agenda will be to receive a financial report and hear any comments of the membership to the Board of Directors. A Meeting of the Board will follow immediately upon the conclusion of the Membership Meeting. For questions, contact Adrienne Ruhl at [email protected]. Audubon Florida 3 Banded American Oystercatchers leftleft theirtheir rooftop nestnesting site site with with one one fledge fledge in tow.in tow. American Oystercatchers: Working Across the State to Protect this Vulnerable Shorebird American Oystercatchers are an iconic coastal species, nesting in our beaches and coastal islands across the Gulf Coast and up the Atlantic seaboard. Sensitive to disturbance, they are a critical barometer of sea level rise and the resiliency of coastal habitats. Audubon works throughout the state to monitor and protect this beautiful shorebird. Audubon Florida Partners with FWRI to Band Rooftop Nesting Oystercatchers In mid-March — just as breeding season was kicking territory, but before they lay eggs. Federally permitted off — Audubon Florida staff in the St. Petersburg region researchers catch them for banding by using a carpet worked with Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute net, decoys, and audio playback in an area we think that (FWRI) to band American Oystercatchers that nest on they might be ready to defend their territories. Once rooftops in Pinellas County. American Oystercatchers, caught, they are removed from the net, measurements a state-designated Threatened species, are declining and weights are taken, bands are added to their legs, as a result of both habitat loss and human disturbance. and then they are released. The whole banding process In Pinellas County, we have started to see a shift in takes less than five minutes to reduce the time the birds oystercatchers nesting on the ground to nesting on are in-hand. gravel rooftops due to a lack of suitable ground nesting habitat where they could successfully raise their young. Audubon and FWRI staff banded two rooftop nesting Banding American Oystercatchers that nest on rooftops pairs. Now that the oystercatchers are banded anyone will help us better understand movement patterns, can report their sighting of a banded oystercatcher to site fidelity, survival, and how they are contributing to the American Oystercatcher Working Group. All that population recovery. is needed is a confirmed sighting of the band code and location of where it was seen. Thanks to reports Audubon Florida’s rooftop biologist, Kara Cook, of band sightings by community scientists, we are scouted out oystercatchers that started showing up learning more about their flight patterns and post- on previously known nesting sites to find pairs that nesting behavior. As of mid-June, three chicks fledged would be suitable for banding. The ideal time to band from the two recently banded adult pairs. oystercatchers is as soon as they show up at their 4 Audubon Florida American Oystercatchers Choose St. Petersburg-area Airport for Nesting Site Audubon coastal biologist Jeff Liechty couldn’t help There are very few nest sites in Pinellas County where feeling nervous for the American Oystercatcher pair American Oystercatchers can nest undisturbed by that chose to nest at the Albert Whitted Airport in recreation or other human activity. This site is closed to St. Petersburg this season. Their diminutive size and public access for safety concerns, and is in proximity to tendency to spook made the pair strange bedfellows food in the bay. “The habitat isn’t traditionally something with the airplanes coming and going from the runways, that the oystercatchers would have chosen for their but it is the presence of the planes — and predator nest,” Liechty explains, “but they have few options here control — that has made this site a successful fledging and it meets the few criteria that this flexible species area for American Oystercatchers. needs: no mammalian predators, no human disturbance, food nearby, open sightlines, gravelly/sandy substrate.” Photo: Jesse Gordon/Audubon Photography Awards Luckily, the birds are far enough from the flight path that they are not a concern for the airport; in fact, the grounds crew made sure the nesting birds remained undisturbed. American Oystercatchers have fledged chicks from this site successfully, and we hope the trend continues this year. Lack of Disturbance Due to COVID Restrictions Yields Banner Year for Chicks at Shell Key Preserve Report a Sighting: FL.Audubon.org/birds/banded-birds Pinellas County closed Shell Key Preserve at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, preventing personal watercraft from landing and people from using the beach. Even when the beaches re-opened, the tour boats and shuttles ran on a limited schedule, and visitation remained lower than in previous years. Three pairs of American Oystercatchers nested in 2020, and two pairs fledged a total of five chicks. In fact, every egg hatched led to a fledged chick, an unheard of success rate! All five were banded in partnership with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission as well as Pinellas County.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Key Committees 2021
    Key Committees 2021 Senate Committee on Appropriations Visit: appropriations.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Patrick J. Leahy, VT, Chairman Richard C. Shelby, AL, Ranking Member* Patty Murray, WA* Mitch McConnell, KY Dianne Feinstein, CA Susan M. Collins, ME Richard J. Durbin, IL* Lisa Murkowski, AK Jack Reed, RI* Lindsey Graham, SC* Jon Tester, MT Roy Blunt, MO* Jeanne Shaheen, NH* Jerry Moran, KS* Jeff Merkley, OR* John Hoeven, ND Christopher Coons, DE John Boozman, AR Brian Schatz, HI* Shelley Moore Capito, WV* Tammy Baldwin, WI* John Kennedy, LA* Christopher Murphy, CT* Cindy Hyde-Smith, MS* Joe Manchin, WV* Mike Braun, IN Chris Van Hollen, MD Bill Hagerty, TN Martin Heinrich, NM Marco Rubio, FL* * Indicates member of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, which funds IMLS - Final committee membership rosters may still be being set “Key Committees 2021” - continued: Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Visit: help.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Patty Murray, WA, Chairman Richard Burr, NC, Ranking Member Bernie Sanders, VT Rand Paul, KY Robert P. Casey, Jr PA Susan Collins, ME Tammy Baldwin, WI Bill Cassidy, M.D. LA Christopher Murphy, CT Lisa Murkowski, AK Tim Kaine, VA Mike Braun, IN Margaret Wood Hassan, NH Roger Marshall, KS Tina Smith, MN Tim Scott, SC Jacky Rosen, NV Mitt Romney, UT Ben Ray Lujan, NM Tommy Tuberville, AL John Hickenlooper, CO Jerry Moran, KS “Key Committees 2021” - continued: Senate Committee on Finance Visit: finance.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Ron Wyden, OR, Chairman Mike Crapo, ID, Ranking Member Debbie Stabenow, MI Chuck Grassley, IA Maria Cantwell, WA John Cornyn, TX Robert Menendez, NJ John Thune, SD Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Business and Conservative Groups Helped Bolster the Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During the Second Fundraising Quarter of 2021
    Big Business And Conservative Groups Helped Bolster The Sedition Caucus’ Coffers During The Second Fundraising Quarter Of 2021 Executive Summary During the 2nd Quarter Of 2021, 25 major PACs tied to corporations, right wing Members of Congress and industry trade associations gave over $1.5 million to members of the Congressional Sedition Caucus, the 147 lawmakers who voted to object to certifying the 2020 presidential election. This includes: • $140,000 Given By The American Crystal Sugar Company PAC To Members Of The Caucus. • $120,000 Given By Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s Majority Committee PAC To Members Of The Caucus • $41,000 Given By The Space Exploration Technologies Corp. PAC – the PAC affiliated with Elon Musk’s SpaceX company. Also among the top PACs are Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, and the National Association of Realtors. Duke Energy and Boeing are also on this list despite these entity’s public declarations in January aimed at their customers and shareholders that were pausing all donations for a period of time, including those to members that voted against certifying the election. The leaders, companies and trade groups associated with these PACs should have to answer for their support of lawmakers whose votes that fueled the violence and sedition we saw on January 6. The Sedition Caucus Includes The 147 Lawmakers Who Voted To Object To Certifying The 2020 Presidential Election, Including 8 Senators And 139 Representatives. [The New York Times, 01/07/21] July 2021: Top 25 PACs That Contributed To The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million The Top 25 PACs That Contributed To Members Of The Sedition Caucus Gave Them Over $1.5 Million During The Second Quarter Of 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons GIS Center GIS Center 5-4-2015 Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park Jennifer H. Richards Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, [email protected] Daniel Gann GIS-RS Center, Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis Recommended Citation Richards, Jennifer H. and Gann, Daniel, "Vegetation Trends in Indicator Regions of Everglades National Park" (2015). GIS Center. 29. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/gis/29 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the GIS Center at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GIS Center by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Final Report for VEGETATION TRENDS IN INDICATOR REGIONS OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK Task Agreement No. P12AC50201 Cooperative Agreement No. H5000-06-0104 Host University No. H5000-10-5040 Date of Report: Feb. 12, 2015 Principle Investigator: Jennifer H. Richards Dept. of Biological Sciences Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-3102 (phone), 305-348-1986 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Co-Principle Investigator: Daniel Gann FIU GIS/RS Center Florida International University Miami, FL 33199 305-348-1971 (phone), 305-348-6445 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) Park Representative: Jimi Sadle, Botanist Everglades National Park 40001 SR 9336 Homestead, FL 33030 305-242-7806 (phone), 305-242-7836 (Fax) FIU Administrative Contact: Susie Escorcia Division of Sponsored Research 11200 SW 8th St. – MARC 430 Miami, FL 33199 305-348-2494 (phone), 305-348-6087 (FAX) 2 Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SFRC T-593 Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting
    Report T-593 Phenology of Flowering an Fruiting In Pia t Com unities of Everglades NP and Biscayne N , orida RESOURCE MANAGEMENT EVERGLi\DES NATIONAL PARK BOX 279 NOMESTEAD, FLORIDA 33030 Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O. Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 PHENOLOGY OF FLOWERING AND FRUITING IN PLANT COMMUNITIES OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND BISCAYNE NATIONAL MONUMENT, FLORIDA Report T - 593 Lloyd L. Loope U.S. National P ark Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 June 1980 Loope, Lloyd L. 1980. Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting in Plant Communities of Everglades National Park and Biscayne National Monument, Florida. South Florida Research Center Report T - 593. 50 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES • ii LIST OF FIGU RES iv INTRODUCTION • 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. • 1 METHODS. • • • • • • • 1 CLIMATE AND WATER LEVELS FOR 1978 •• . 3 RESULTS ••• 3 DISCUSSION. 3 The need and mechanisms for synchronization of reproductive activity . 3 Tropical hardwood forest. • • 5 Freshwater wetlands 5 Mangrove vegetation 6 Successional vegetation on abandoned farmland. • 6 Miami Rock Ridge pineland. 7 SUMMARY ••••• 7 LITERATURE CITED 8 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Climatic data for Homestead Experiment Station, 1978 . • . • . • . • . • . • . 10 Table 2. Climatic data for Tamiami Trail at 40-Mile Bend, 1978 11 Table 3. Climatic data for Flamingo, 1978. • • • • • • • • • 12 Table 4. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, area of Elliott Key Marina, Biscayne National Monument, 1978 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Table 5. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Bear Lake Trail, Everglades National Park (ENP), 1978 • . • . • . 17 Table 6. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Mahogany Hammock, ENP, 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Board 1
    SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Evaluation of Options for Sending More Water to Florida Bay Via Taylor Slough Using Regional Simulation Model for the Everglades and Lower East Coast Fahmida Khatun, PE, PMP, Raul Novoa, PE and Walter Wilcox, PE Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration April 18-20, 2017 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Florida Bay Concerns LOK ENP Florida Bay TS 2 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Plan to Help Florida Bay 3 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT South Dade Study Features 1. Seasonal (Aug-Dec) lowered operations for the S-332B, S-332C and S-332D and S-199s and S-200s pump stations. 2. lower capacity, more frequent opening of S-176 and S-177 spillways 3. Add a 200 cfs pump downstream of S-178 4. Constructing maximum 15 miles long seepage barrier S-176 S-200 5. Infrastructure improvement to S-332 S-178 promote flows toward Taylor S-199 Slough: Moving forward with Florida Bay Plan Aerojet Canal 4 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Model Details Modeling Tool: RSM (Regional Simulation Model) Developed by SFWMD with South RSMGL Florida’s unique hydrology in mind Model: RSMGL (Regional Simulation Model for Everglades & Lower East Coast) Model Domain: Domain size: 5,825 sq. miles Mesh Information: Finite element mesh Number of cells: 5,794 Average size: ~ 1 sq. mile Canal Information: FL Bay Total length: ~ 1,000 miles Plan SD Study Number of segments: ~ 1,000 Average length: ~ 1 mile Run Time: ~ 1 day 5 SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Florida Bay Options Scenario Step1A4 Scenario
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Pattern – Marl Prairie/Slough Gradient Annual Report - 2013 (Cooperative Agreement #: W912HZ-09-2-0018)
    Landscape Pattern – Marl Prairie/Slough Gradient Annual Report - 2013 (Cooperative Agreement #: W912HZ-09-2-0018) Submitted to Dr. Al F. Cofrancesco U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S. Army – ERDC) 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39081-6199 Email: [email protected] Jay P. Sah, Michael S. Ross, Pablo L. Ruiz Southeast Environmental Research Center Florida Internal University, Miami, FL 33186 2015 Southeast Environmental Research Center 11200 SW 8th Street, OE 148 Miami, FL 33199 Tel: 305.348.3095 Fax: 305.34834096 http://casgroup.fiu.edu/serc/ Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... iii General Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Data acquisition ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Vegetation sampling ........................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Ground elevation and water depth measuremnets ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aaron Bean from Fernandina Beach
    2020 2022 THE FLORIDA SENATE HANDBOOK 1 2 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT WILTON SIMPSON President of the Senate Welcome to the Florida Senate. During this unprecedented global pandemic, the Senate has partnered with an infectious disease team at Tampa General Hospital and hired an in-house epidemiologist to develop safety protocols designed to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and keep Senators and our Senate professional staff as safe as possible. Just like our Senators and staff, you also play an important role in the legislative process. Input from various stakeholders and members of the public is critical, and the Senate is working diligently to ensure Floridians have access to their elected officials as we consider important legislation for our state. Until the COVID-19 vaccine is widely available for those outside of high-risk designation, the Senate is proceeding with care and caution, limiting in-person meetings, and observing social distancing guidelines, mask requirements, and sanitation protocols. For the 2021 Regular Session of the Florida Legislature, the Senate is working in partnership with Florida State University to reserve three remote viewing rooms at the Leon County Civic Center, which provide the opportunity for members of the public to view meetings and virtually address Senate committees in a safe, socially distant manner. We also encourage you to stay involved by viewing all Senate meetings and floor sittings on our website and contacting your local Senator with suggestions, ideas, and feedback. I look forward to the day when we can all be together again walking the halls and chambers where Florida's citizen-legislators have served for generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Contamination and Impacts to Water Supply
    SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT March 2007 Final Draft CCoonnssoolliiddaatteedd WWaatteerr SSuuppppllyy PPllaann SSUUPPPPOORRTT DDOOCCUUMMEENNTT Water Supply Department South Florida Water Managemment District TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss List of Tables and Figures................................................................................v Acronyms and Abbreviations........................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction..................................................................................1 Basis of Water Supply Planning.....................................................................1 Legal Authority and Requirements ................................................................1 Water Supply Planning Initiative...................................................................4 Water Supply Planning History .....................................................................4 Districtwide Water Supply Assessment............................................................5 Regional Water Supply Plans .......................................................................6 Chapter 2: Natural Systems .............................................................................7 Overview...............................................................................................7 Major Surface Water Features.................................................................... 13 Kissimmee Basin and Chain of Lakes ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • April 24, 2020 (Florida Federal Qualifying) Report
    2020 Florida Federal Candidate Qualifying Report / Finance Reports Cumulative Totals through March 31, 2020 Office Currently Elected Challenger Party Contributions Expenditures Total COH CD01 Matt Gaetz REP $ 1,638,555.81 $ 1,284,221.76 $ 496,295.82 CD01 Phil Ehr DEM $ 342,943.79 $ 188,474.53 $ 154,469.26 CD01 Greg Merk REP $ - $ - $ - CD01 John Mills REP $ 5,000.00 $ 5,132.61 $ 145.02 CD01 Albert Oram* NPA CD02 Neal Dunn REP $ 297,532.04 $ 264,484.41 $ 419,201.78 CD02 Kim O'Connor* WRI CD02 Kristy Thripp* WRI CD03 OPEN - Ted Yoho REP CD03 Kat Cammack REP $ 207,007.59 $ 41,054.05 $ 165,953.54 CD03 Ryan Chamberlin REP $ 101,333.00 $ 4,025.39 $ 97,307.61 CD03 Todd Chase REP $ 163,621.68 $ 27,032.07 $ 136,589.61 CD03 Adam Christensen DEM $ - $ - $ - CD03 Philip Dodds DEM $ 6,301.17 $ 4,035.13 $ 2,266.04 CD03 Bill Engelbrecht REP $ 27,050.00 $ 4,955.94 $ 22,094.06 CD03 Joe Dallas Millado* REP CD03 Gavin Rollins REP $ 106,370.00 $ 9,730.33 $ 96,639.67 CD03 Judson Sapp REP $ 430,233.01 $ 120,453.99 $ 310,011.88 CD03 Ed Silva* WRI CD03 James St. George REP $ 400,499.60 $ 64,207.88 $ 336,291.72 CD03 David Theus REP $ 6,392.11 $ 473.58 $ 5,918.53 CD03 Amy Pope Wells REP $ 56,982.45 $ 46,896.17 $ 10,086.28 CD03 Tom Wells DEM $ 1,559.31 $ 1,289.68 $ 295.58 CD04 John Rutherford REP $ 513,068.32 $ 281,060.16 $ 597,734.31 CD04 Erick Aguilar REP $ 11,342.00 $ 6,220.00 $ 5,122.00 CD04 Donna Deegan DEM $ 425,901.36 $ 165,436.85 $ 260,464.51 CD04 Gary Koniz* WRI CD05 Al Lawson DEM $ 355,730.10 $ 168,874.69 $ 201,527.67 CD05 Gary Adler REP $ 40,325.00 $ 920.08 $ 39,404.92 CD05 Albert Chester DEM $ 43,230.65 $ 28,044.61 $ 15,186.04 CD05 Roger Wagoner REP $ - $ - $ - CD06 Michael Waltz REP $ 1,308,541.18 $ 626,699.95 $ 733,402.64 CD06 Clint Curtis DEM $ 13,503.79 $ 1,152.12 $ 12,351.67 CD06 Alan Grayson WRI $ 69,913.27 $ 56,052.54 $ 716,034.49 CD06 John.
    [Show full text]
  • C-111 South Dade Project Fact Sheet
    C-111 | South Dade Project FACTS & INFORMATION JANUARY 2019 The Canal 111 (C-111) South Dade project is a part of the South Dade County portion of the Central and Southern Florida (C&SF) project authorized in 1962 to provide flood control to agricultural lands in South Dade County and to discharge flood waters to Taylor Slough in Everglades National Park (ENP). In 1968, modifications were authorized to provide water supply to ENP and South Dade County. Environmental concerns caused construction to be discontinued before all authorized project features were completed. PROJECT LOCATION The project is located in the extreme southeastern portion of Florida, adjacent to ENP, and at the downstream end of the PROJECT OVERVIEW C&SF project. The basin includes about 100 square miles of The project is a part of the South Dade County portion of the agriculture in the Homestead/Florida City area and the Taylor C&SF project authorized in 1962 to provide flood control to Slough Basin within ENP. agricultural lands in South Dade County and to discharge flood waters to Taylor Slough in ENP. In 1968, modifications were PROJECT STATUS authorized to provide water supply to Everglades National Park and South Dade County. Environmental concerns caused All construction contracts were completed in September 2018; construction to be discontinued before all authorized project project features will be complete in Summer 2019. features were completed. A Post Authorization Change Report is ongoing todetermine C-111 separates ENP from highly productive subtropical the permanent replacement for S-332B andS-332C temporary agricultural lands to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of Escambia County, Florida
    United States In cooperation with Department of the University of Florida, Agriculture Institute of Food and Soil Survey of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Agricultural Experiment Escambia County, Resources Stations, and Soil and Water Conservation Science Department; and the Service Florida Department of Florida Agriculture and Consumer Services How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs.
    [Show full text]