DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Escambia County, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Escambia County, Florida United States In cooperation with Department of the University of Florida, Agriculture Institute of Food and Soil Survey of Agricultural Sciences, Natural Agricultural Experiment Escambia County, Resources Stations, and Soil and Water Conservation Science Department; and the Service Florida Department of Florida Agriculture and Consumer Services How To Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is a color map, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit. Also see the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. ii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1992. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1997. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1992. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural Experiment Stations, and Soil and Water Science Department; and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Escambia Soil and Water Conservation District. The Escambia County Board of Commissioners contributed financially to the acceleration of the survey. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Logo of the Escambia County Board of Commissioners. Escambia County, located on the northern coast of the Gulf of Mexico, is noted for beautiful white-sand beaches and sailing ships. The county is the home of the Pensacola Naval Air Station. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. iii Contents How To Use This Soil Survey .................................. i 14—Allanton-Pottsburg complex ........................ 26 Contents ................................................................. iii 15—Resota sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes............. 28 Foreword ............................................................... vii 16—Arents-Urban land complex ........................ 28 General Nature of the County ................................... 1 17—Kureb sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes............. 29 How This Survey Was Made ..................................... 4 18—Pits ............................................................. 30 General Soil Map Units .......................................... 7 19—Foxworth sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ......... 30 Areas on Uplands Dominated by Nearly Level 20—Lakeland sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes.......... 31 to Steep, Loamy and Sandy Soils .................. 7 21—Lakeland sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes........ 32 1. Red Bay-Notcher ....................................... 7 22—Urban land .................................................. 33 2. Troup-Lakeland .......................................... 8 24—Poarch sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 3. Troup-Poarch-Perdido ................................ 8 slopes .......................................................... 33 4. Notcher-Troup............................................ 9 25—Poarch sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent 5. Notcher-Bonifay-Troup ............................. 10 slopes .......................................................... 34 6. Troup-Poarch-Pelham .............................. 11 26—Poarch sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent Areas on Coastal Lowlands Dominated by slopes .......................................................... 35 Nearly Level to Moderately Sloping, 27—Escambia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 Sandy Mineral Soils and Mucky Organic percent slopes ............................................. 36 Soils ............................................................. 11 28—Grady loam ................................................. 37 7. Pickney-Croatan ...................................... 11 29—Perdido sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 8. Lakeland-Hurricane ................................. 12 slopes .......................................................... 37 9. Leon-Pickney ........................................... 12 30—Perdido sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent 10. Corolla-Newhan-Duckston ..................... 13 slopes .......................................................... 38 Areas on Flood Plains, in Swamps, and on 31—Perdido sandy loam, 5 to 8 percent Low Stream Terraces Dominated by Level slopes .......................................................... 39 to Gently Sloping, Loamy and Sandy 32—Troup sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ............... 40 Mineral Soils and Mucky Organic Soils 33—Troup sand, 5 to 8 percent slopes ............... 41 that are Subject to Flooding ......................... 13 34—Troup sand, 8 to 12 percent slopes ............. 42 11. Dorovan-Fluvaquents-Pelham ............... 14 35—Lucy loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes ...... 43 12. Dorovan-Fluvaquents-Mantachie ........... 14 36—Lucy loamy sand, 2 to 5 percent slopes ...... 44 13. Mantachie-Fluvaquents-Bigbee ............. 15 38—Bonifay loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent Detailed Soil Map Units ........................................ 17 slopes .......................................................... 45 2—Duckston sand, frequently flooded ................ 18 39—Bonifay loamy sand, 5 to 8 percent 3—Corolla-Duckston sands, gently undulating, slopes .......................................................... 46 flooded ......................................................... 18 40—Eunola fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 4—Pickney sand ................................................ 19 slopes, occasionally flooded ........................ 47 5—Croatan and Pickney soils, depressional ...... 19 41—Malbis sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent 6—Dirego muck, tidal ......................................... 20 slopes .......................................................... 48 7—Kureb sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes ................ 20 42—Malbis sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ... 48 8—Newhan-Corolla complex, rolling, rarely 43—Albany sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ............. 50 flooded ......................................................... 21 44—Corolla-Urban land complex, 0 to 5 9—Leon sand ..................................................... 22 percent slopes, rarely flooded ...................... 51 10—Beaches...................................................... 24 45—Troup and Perdido soils, 8 to 35 percent 11—Hurricane sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes ........ 24 slopes, severely eroded ............................... 52 12—Croatan muck, depressional ....................... 25 46—Garcon-Bigbee-Yemassee complex, 0 to 13—Lakeland sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes.......... 26 5 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ......... 53 iv 47—Hurricane and Albany soils, 0 to 5 70—Izagora fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent percent slopes, occasionally flooded............ 54 slopes, occasionally flooded ........................ 78 48—Pelham-Yemassee complex, occasionally 71—Iuka fine sandy loam, frequently flooded ..... 79 flooded ......................................................... 55 72—Yemassee fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 49—Dorovan muck and Fluvaquents, percent slopes, occasionally flooded............ 80 frequently flooded .......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Florida Audubon Naturalist Summer 2021
    Naturalist Summer 2021 Female Snail Kite. Photo: Nancy Elwood Heidi McCree, Board Chair 2021 Florida Audubon What a privilege to serve as the newly-elected Chair of the Society Leadership Audubon Florida Board. It is an honor to be associated with Audubon Florida’s work and together, we will continue to Executive Director address the important issues and achieve our mission to protect Julie Wraithmell birds and the places they need. We send a huge thank you to our outgoing Chair, Jud Laird, for his amazing work and Board of Directors leadership — the birds are better off because of your efforts! Summer is here! Locals and visitors alike enjoy sun, the beach, and Florida’s amazing Chair waterways. Our beaches are alive with nesting sea and shorebirds, and across the Heidi McCree Everglades we are wrapping up a busy wading bird breeding season. At the Center Vice-Chair for Birds of Prey, more than 200 raptor chicks crossed our threshold — and we Carol Colman Timmis released more than half back to the wild. As Audubon Florida’s newest Board Chair, I see the nesting season as a time to celebrate the resilience of birds, while looking Treasurer forward to how we can protect them into the migration season and beyond. We Scott Taylor will work with state agencies to make sure the high levels of conservation funding Secretary turn into real wins for both wildlife and communities (pg. 8). We will forge new Lida Rodriguez-Taseff partnerships to protect Lake Okeechobee and the Snail Kites that nest there (pg. 14).
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness on the Edge: a History of Everglades National Park
    Wilderness on the Edge: A History of Everglades National Park Robert W Blythe Chicago, Illinois 2017 Prepared under the National Park Service/Organization of American Historians cooperative agreement Table of Contents List of Figures iii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Acronyms Used in Footnotes xv Chapter 1: The Everglades to the 1920s 1 Chapter 2: Early Conservation Efforts in the Everglades 40 Chapter 3: The Movement for a National Park in the Everglades 62 Chapter 4: The Long and Winding Road to Park Establishment 92 Chapter 5: First a Wildlife Refuge, Then a National Park 131 Chapter 6: Land Acquisition 150 Chapter 7: Developing the Park 176 Chapter 8: The Water Needs of a Wetland Park: From Establishment (1947) to Congress’s Water Guarantee (1970) 213 Chapter 9: Water Issues, 1970 to 1992: The Rise of Environmentalism and the Path to the Restudy of the C&SF Project 237 Chapter 10: Wilderness Values and Wilderness Designations 270 Chapter 11: Park Science 288 Chapter 12: Wildlife, Native Plants, and Endangered Species 309 Chapter 13: Marine Fisheries, Fisheries Management, and Florida Bay 353 Chapter 14: Control of Invasive Species and Native Pests 373 Chapter 15: Wildland Fire 398 Chapter 16: Hurricanes and Storms 416 Chapter 17: Archeological and Historic Resources 430 Chapter 18: Museum Collection and Library 449 Chapter 19: Relationships with Cultural Communities 466 Chapter 20: Interpretive and Educational Programs 492 Chapter 21: Resource and Visitor Protection 526 Chapter 22: Relationships with the Military
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades National Park and the Seminole Problem
    EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK 21 7 Invaders and Swamps Large numbers of Americans began migrating into south Florida during the late nineteenth century after railroads had cut through the forests and wetlands below Lake Okeechobee. By the 1880s engineers and land developers began promoting drainage projects, convinced that technology could transform this water-sogged country into land suitable for agriculture. At the turn of the cen- EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND THE tury, steam shovels and dredges hissed and wheezed their way into the Ever- glades, bent on draining the Southeast's last wilderness. They were the latest of SEMlNOLE PROBLEM many intruders. Although Spanish explorers had arrived on the Florida coast early in the sixteenth century, Spain's imperial toehold never grew beyond a few fragile It seems we can't do anything but harm to those people even outposts. Inland remained mysterious, a cartographic void, El Laguno del Es- when we try to help them. pirito Santo. Following Spain, the British too had little success colonizing the -Old Man Temple, Key Largo, 1948 interior. After several centuries, all that Europeans had established were a few scattered coastal forts. Nonetheless, Europe's hand fell heavily through disease and warfare upon the aboriginal Xmucuan, Apalachee, and Calusa people. By 1700 the peninsula's interior and both coasts were almost devoid of Indians. Swollen by tropical rains and overflowing every summer for millennia, Lake The vacuum did not last long. Creeks from Georgia and Alabama soon Filtered Okeechobee releases a sheet of water that drains south over grass-covered marl into Florida's panhandle and beyond, occupying native hunting grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Features Positive Effects Negative Effects
    Name: ________________________________________ Date: ____________ Study Guide: Geography KEY Ms. Carey Geographic Features: Geographic Positive Effects Negative Effects Features Rivers, Oceans, Seas Easy trade, travel, fertile Vulnerable to attacks (easy to invade), soil (can grow food) floods Desert Protection from invaders Difficult to trade, hot, dry (arid), can’t farm (hard to travel) Mountains Protection from invaders Isolated from other people, difficult to trade, travel and difficult to farm Plains Easy trade, travel, fertile Vulnerable to attacks (easy to invade) soil (can grow food) Continents and Oceans: Vocabulary: River Archipelago Ocean Island Continent Pangaea Desert Plains Peninsula Mountain 1. Island: An area of land completely surrounded by water. 2. Peninsula: An area of land completely surrounded by water on three (3) sides and connected to the mainland by an isthmus. 3. Archipelago: A chain of islands, such as Japan and Greece. 4. Continent: A large body of LAND. (hint: there are seven) 5. Ocean: A large body of salt water. (hint: there are four main ones) 6. Desert: A large, arid (dry) area of land which receives less than 10 inches of rain annually. 7. River: A freshwater body of water which flows from a higher elevation to a lower one. 8. Mountain: An area that rises steeply at least 2,000 feet above sea level; usually wide at the bottom and rising to a narrow peak or ridge. 9. Plains: A large area of flat or gently rolling land which is fertile and good for farming. 10. Pangaea: The name of a huge super continent that scientists believe split apart about 200 million years ago, forming different continents.
    [Show full text]
  • 10R.3 the Tornado Outbreak Across the North Florida Panhandle in Association with Hurricane Ivan
    10R.3 The Tornado Outbreak across the North Florida Panhandle in association with Hurricane Ivan Andrew I. Watson* Michael A. Jamski T.J. Turnage NOAA/National Weather Service Tallahassee, Florida Joshua R.Bowen Meteorology Department Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida Jason C. Kelley WJHG-TV Panama City, Florida 1. INTRODUCTION their mobile homes were destroyed near Blountstown, Florida. Hurricane Ivan made landfall early on the morning of 16 September 2004, just west of Overall, there were 24 tornadoes reported Gulf Shores, Alabama as a category 3 across the National Weather Service (NWS) hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Tallahassee forecast area. The office issued Scale. Approximately 117 tornadoes were 130 tornado warnings from the afternoon of 15 reported associated with Ivan across the September until just after daybreak on 16 southeast United States. Eight people were September. killed and 17 were injured by tornadoes (Storm Data 2004; Stewart 2004). The most The paper examines the convective cells significant tornadoes occurred as hurricane within the rain bands of hurricane Ivan, which Ivan approached the Florida Gulf coast on the produced these tornadoes across the Florida afternoon and evening of 15 September. Panhandle, Big Bend, and southwest Georgia. The structure of the tornadic and non-tornadic The intense outer rain bands of Ivan supercells is examined for clues on how to produced numerous supercells over portions better warn for these types of storms. This of the Florida Panhandle, Big Bend, southwest study will focus on the short-term predictability Georgia, and Gulf coastal waters. In turn, of these dangerous storms, and will these supercells spawned dozens of investigate the problem of how to reduce the tornadoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida National Scenic Trail (U.S
    The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is America’s premier federal program that reinvests offshore energy revenue into conservation to ensure that we all have access to the outdoors. Whether it is a local community park or playground, or the vast expanses of our federal public lands, Congress created the LWCF over a half-century ago to guarantee America’s natural, historical and outdoor recreation heritage. TELL YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS ABOUT YOUR CONNECTION TO THESE LWCF PLACES NEAR YOU. Project overviews courtesy of the LWCF Coalition. lwcfcoalition.com Project Name/Unit: Florida National Scenic Trail (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, NPS) LWCF Contribution: $18 million Stakeholders Involved: Florida Trail Association Keywords/Characteristics (eg. rec access, drinking water, consolidating maintenance): Recreation access, water resource protection, habitat conservation, consolidating maintenance, finishing our parks/trails Short Description: The Florida National Scenic Trail (commonly known as the Florida National Scenic Trail Florida Trail) currently offers more than 1,100 miles of long distance hiking, from Credit: USFS Big Cypress National Preserve in the south to Gulf Islands National Seashore in the northwest panhandle, crossing three national forests and the St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge. Because of the variety of environments along the trail, from swamps and beaches, to forests and rivers, activities such as biking, horseback riding, wildlife viewing, paddling, camping, and hunting are encouraged. The trail is within easy access of many of the nation’s most densely populated communities and is hailed as a great escape into the outdoors for adventurers. Since the trail was founded in 1966, over $18 million in LWCF funding has been invested in trail lands, but 300 miles of trail are still in limbo and need protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Flat-Top Butte Juniper Encroachment
    Worksheet Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management BLM Office: Casper Field Office, Wyoming Lease/Serial/Case File No.: Range Improvement Project No. 17657 Tracking Number: DOI-BLM-WY-P060-2016-0033-DNA Proposed Action Title/Type: Flat-top Butte Juniper Encroachment Location of Proposed Action: T30N/ R79W Sec 6 and T30N/R80W, Section 1-2, Natrona County Applicant: BLM A. Description ofProposed Action: The BLM is proposing to treat 562 acres of juniper which has encroached into sagebrush grassland habitat located on Flat-Top Butte located in southern Natrona County. The proposed treatments are located within the Corral Creek (#10106) and Sheep Creek (#10131) grazing allotments. The purpose ofthe vegetative treatment is to enhance sagebrush habitat conditions for wildlife in the Bates Hole area, particularly Greater sage-grouse nesting habitat, big game crucial winter range, as well as improve the hydrologic function of associated drainages. The emphasis ofthis project is to maintain and enhance stands of sagebrush grassland habitat. Treatments would involve contract crews utilizing chainsaws to cut and scatter encroaching junipers on approximately 455 acres, IAW the attached Statement of Work (Appendix 1). Denser stands (-107 acres) may be treated mechanically utilizing a rubber tracked skid steer equipped with a masticator to shred the trees. Total treatment area would include approximately 562 acres, as depicted on the attached map. Treatment areas would be clearly delineated. Treatments are expected to take 2-4 months to 1 111 complete and would occur after July 15 \ ending no later than November 15 to minimize wildlife impacts during sensitive periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Aboard Package
    North Florida Shipyards, Inc. Welcome Aboard Package Welcome Aboard Package The Guide to NFSY and the Jacksonville Area Welcome to North Florida Shipyards! NFSY has been operating in ship repair and conversion since 1977. Our expert team and dedicated work force is commited to providing both our commercial and government clients with cost-effective vessel conversion, dry-docking and repair services. We have worked on a wide range of projects that have provided our team with the skills and expertise to work on a variety of commerical and government vessels. We provide excellent repair service allowing you to fulfill any comitments in a timely fashion. We intend to rise above expectations for every customer. We have detailed information throughout this package in order to help you learn more about NFSY and the Jacksonville area. We hope this package answers any questions you have, and helps you navigate and enjoy your stay in Jacksonville. Please do not hesitate to contact any one of our team members with any questions you may have. Thank you, Matthew Self – NFSY President 1 About NFSY North Florida Shipyards, Inc. is a family owned and operated company that manages ship repair and conversion facilities at Commodores Point and Mayport Naval Station in Jacksonville, FL. The company was founded in 1977 and incorporated in 1978. The company grew as an extension of Thermal Engineering Company, incorporated in 1967. The main office and facility is located at Commodore’s Point. It has approximately 3800 ft. of bulk-headed wharf, 210,000 sq. ft. of warehouse and shops, and resides on approximately 25 acres of property.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms
    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Tortugas Expedition Journal
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Dry Tortugas National Park Florida Dry Tortugas Expedition JOurnal 0 100 200 Feet 0 100 200 Meters North B U S GARDEN H KEY K E North coaling Y dock ruins S H T O OA M A L Magazine Officers’ Soldiers’ Quarters Barracks S N Visitor O Center Harbor light BUSH R Park KEY Cistern K Headquarters E Magazine Seaplane L beach A R E A Boat pier Dockhouse Swimming area Diinghy beach Good snorkeling off coaling docks and moat walls South coaling dock ruins E A A R A G E "11" H O R A N C "12" "10" Visible ruin Picnic area Primitive campground 2 Fort Jefferson Expedition Journal Restrooms 0 100 200 Feet Welcome Traveler! 0 100 200 Meters North B You have just arrived at Fort Jefferson on Garden Key, part of a group U S of islands known as the Dry Tortugas. As you explore this place, ask GARDEN H yourself, “How can artifacts reveal the stories of a place?” KEY K E North coaling Y As you search Garden Key for artifacts, record your observations in dock ruins S H this Expedition Journal. Remember that an artifact is something that T O OA M A provides evidence. Justifications are the reasons why the artifacts L support the statement. Then, using your expertise as an explorer of Magazine this national park, write a persuasive letter about the value of Dry Tortugas National Park. Officers’ Soldiers’ Quarters Barracks S N Visitor Fort Jefferson became a national monument in 1935 and later O Center Harbor light BUSH expanded to be Dry Tortugas National Park in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing the Dune-Field Pattern at White Sands National Monument R
    White Sands Science Symposium RESEARCH BRIEF JUNE 2012 Constructing the Dune-Field Pattern at White Sands National Monument R. C. EWING Introduction Sand dunes cover vast areas of the Earth’s desert regions and are widespread across Venus, Mars, and Saturn’s moon Titan. Sand dunes are very sensitive indicators of changing climate and environmental conditions, and landscapes created by sand dunes can provide a detailed record of past surface conditions on the planetary surfaces. Reading the climate record from these landscapes and understanding how these landscapes change with changing environmental conditions is a great challenge because sand dunes are formed through complicated interactions between the sand, wind, and the surface topography they create as they grow. Ultimately, the complicated interplay among these three variables records the climate conditions during the formation of dunes and dune-covered landscape patterns. How do sand dunes grow? How do sand dune patterns form? White Sands National Monument (NM) provides an ideal natural laboratory to study the dynamics of sand Figure 1. A LiDAR-derived digital elevation model showing the dunes and the creation of a landscape pattern to answer transition from the Alkali Flat, which does not have dunes, into these questions because the dunes at White Sands NM are White Sands Dune Field. For visualization purposes, the orange growing and changing the entire year. areas show the steepest slopes of the dunes and how they are changing through time. The orange areas mark the abrupt first Methods appearance of the dunes. Time-series aerial photographs from 1944, 1963, 1977, 1985, 1996, 2003, 2005, and 2010 and airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) collected June 2007, June 2008, mapped through manual digitization.
    [Show full text]