DOCSLIB.ORG

AP Language and Composition/ Pre-AP English 11 Course Requirements and Highlights 2017-2018 Bassett High School Mrs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AP Language and Composition/ Pre-AP English 11 Course Requirements and Highlights 2017-2018 Bassett High School Mrs AP Language and Composition/ Pre-AP English 11 Course Requirements and Highlights 2017-2018 Bassett High School Mrs. Sarah Kenny- Rm. 13 Email: [email protected] The AP Language and Composition class is designed for eleventh graders who plan to take AP or dual enrollment English during their senior year and who will take the AP test in May. The content of the course includes an in-depth study of the types of writing: description, narration, persuasion and argumentation, and exposition. The course of study includes the mechanics, process, and analysis of written expression. Students utilize methods of writing that encourage "intelligent writing" instead of simply "mechanically- correct" writing. The course also includes in-depth analyses of classic and contemporary American literature. Because of this demanding course, students must have a serious attitude and be willing to work hard toward improving writing and literary analysis skills. Course Introduction AP Language and Composition not only teaches academic writing but personal writing as well. The goal of this course is to introduce students to various rhetorical modes: argument, rhetorical analysis, and synthesis. The expectations and requirements are high, but the knowledge and increased writing skills are imperative for success in higher-level fields. In an AP Language and Composition course, students are required to read works of literature and rhetoric and to develop a sophisticated and differentiated style of responding to these different works. Reading the works is fundamental and required; being able to discuss the works intelligently, either in small groups or in large class settings, is also necessary. Being able to write about the works’ content and style is essential. You will be doing a lot of writing. In fact, you will have to write a lot more than I can formally assess. The number of written assignments will vary depending on the level of the students’ previous preparation in composition. We will write a minimum of 2 essays per grading period, in and out of class. Essays will be assessed using performance rubrics. A. Method of Instruction This class is a combination of lecture, group discussion, peer conferences, reading requirements, oral presentations, seminars and writer’s workshop. B. Expected Course Outcomes In preparation for the AP examinations in English, students should read widely and reflect on their reading through extensive discussion, writing and rewriting. Students should assume considerable responsibility for the amount of reading and writing they do. The AP course assumes students already understand and use Standard English. The intense concentration on language in this course will enhance the following: a wide-ranging vocabulary used appropriately and effectively; a variety of sentence structures; a logical organization; a balance of detail; C. Course Goals and Objectives In the AP course, students will create and sustain arguments based on reading and research, demonstrate mastery of standard written English as well as stylistic maturity in their own writings, write in a variety of genres and contexts, analyze and apply effective strategies and techniques in their own writing, identify and explain an author’s use of rhetorical strategies and techniques. read extensively and master a wide range of types of literature read a wide range of nonfiction works read closely for detail read for literary devices and structures and rhetorical strategies read challenging works of recognized literary merit respond to reading through thoughtful inquiry articulate responses orally in rich discussions conducted in an atmosphere of open exploration and acceptance of alternative interpretations write intelligent, insightful, and sensitive critical analyses of literary passages and works in both impromptu and prepared essays D. Student Suggested Supplies 3-ring binder (1 ½ or 2 inches) Folder or binder insert(s) with pockets Loose leaf paper (college ruled) Highlighters Pencils Pens (blue or black) Dry Erase Markers Sticky pads (your preference for annotation) Available textbooks E. Recent Novels of Study The Grapes of Wrath- John Steinbeck A Streetcar Named Desire and The Glass Menagerie – Tennessee Williams The Awakening – Kate Chopin Pilgrim at Tinker Creek – Annie Dillard The Things They Carried – Tim O’Brian Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglas- Frederick Douglas Death of a Salesman and The Crucible – Arthur Miller The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn –Mark Twain F. Student Evaluation Evaluations will occur throughout the English section of the course in the following areas: i. Tests (worth 200 points) ii. Quizzes (worth 100 points) iii. Essays (100 or 200 points-- As Posted on Assignment) iv. Research/Projects (200 points) v. Oral Presentation (200 points) vi. Daily assignments/ homework (100 points) G. Grading Scale and Credits LETTER GRADE NUMBER RANGE HCPS Courses DE/AP Courses A+ 100-97 4.0 5.0 A 96-93 4.0 5.0 A- 92-90 3.7 4.7 B+ 89-87 3.3 4.3 B 86-83 3.0 4.0 B- 82-80 2.7 3.7 C+ 79-77 2.3 3.3 C 76-73 2.0 3.0 C- 72-70 1.7 2.7 D+ 69-68 1.3 2.3 D 67-66 1.0 2.0 D- 65-60 .7 1.7 F 59-0 0 0 H. Specific Classroom Policies Electronic Devices: On occasion, cell/smart phones/watches etc. may be a part of our classroom projects, but on all other occasions, these devices are to be turned off and out of sight. If the teacher sees the cell phone, she will take it and place it in cell phone jail until the end of class. There is to be absolutely no contact with electronic devices during formal assessments. Food and Drink: Please adhere to BHS policies regarding keeping cafeteria food in the designated eating areas. Also, beverages should be in containers with screw on tops (sealed until your arrival in the school). Snacks and treats may be discretely consumed in class as long as students clean up after themselves. Messes, trash, unpleasant odors, disruptive sharing, etc. will result in the loss of food and beverage privilege. Every effort must be made to maintain a sanitary and healthy environment. Attendance: Daily attendance is mandatory and does affect the overall success of a student in this course. If a student misses more than 50% of a class period, he/she will earn an absence. Tardy Policy: Each day a student must make every effort to be punctual. Please read the policy updates in your student handbook/agenda. Students are allowed only two tardies per class per semester before disciplinary action will be taken. Students should be in the classroom before the bell rings—not running in at the tail end of the bell. Technical Problems: Personal computer/printer problems should not be used as an excuse for late work. The school library has computers for your use. Students should complete assignments in time to troubleshoot technical difficulties before deadlines. Make-up work: The student is responsible for taking care of any work missed due to absences. All students with a verified absence will have three days to make up any missed work. Unexcused, late assignments may not be accepted. The student will receive credit for his missed work only if the absence was verified or excused and if the teacher receives the completed work before the three- day period. If a student does not report to class but has been in school during the day an assignment is due, he must turn in the assignment before he leaves, or it will not be accepted. Student activities and school sanctioned trips will not excuse a student from any required work. If a student is absent the day of a quiz/test, the student must be prepared to take the missed quiz /test the next day the class meets. Being absent before an assignment is due or before a test does not excuse the student from turning in the assignment or from taking the test on the scheduled day. Personal Conduct: Respect one another. Lack of consideration for the teachers or students will not be tolerated. Paper Organization: All assignments should be organized using MLA format. The student’s name, course number, instructor’s name, and date of submission should fall on the first four lines on the left-hand margin. Each essay should have a title, centered on the following line (line 5). All essays should be typed in a 12-point, double-spaced, easily readable font. Plagiarism/Cheating: (taken from PHCC English 111 syllabus; Mrs. J. Staples) Cheating is the actual or attempted practice of fraudulent or deceptive acts for the purpose of improving one’s grade or obtaining course credit; such acts also include assisting another student to do so. Typically, such acts occur in relation to exams, projects or homework. However, it is the intent of this definition that the term cheating not be limited to the above listed situations only, but that it include any and all actions by a student that are intended to gain an unearned academic advantage by fraudulent or deceptive means. Plagiarism is a specific form of cheating which consists of the misuse of the published and/or unpublished works of others by misrepresenting the material so used as one’s own work. Penalties for cheating and plagiarism are a 0% on the assignment, a referral to the assigned administrator and a parent conference. Plagiarism can include submitting a paper written by someone else as your own; written by means of inappropriate collaboration; written by you for another class, submitted without the permission of both instructors; purchased, downloaded, or cut and pasted from the Internet; or that fails to properly acknowledge its source through standard citations. An honor code will be enforced.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Examination Essays In
    A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF EXAMINATION ESSAYS IN THREE DISCIPLINES: THE CASE OF GHANAIAN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS JOSEPH BENJAMIN ARCHIBALD AFFUL (B.A. (Hons), Dip. Ed., MPhil) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am very grateful to many people from diverse backgrounds for their invaluable contributions in several forms towards the completion of this work. First, I owe a great debt of gratitude to Dr. Sunita Anne Abraham, who has been helpful as principal supervisor and inspiring with her invaluable guidance, able supervision, and unflagging interest in my research. I would also like to express my profound gratitude to Associate Professor Christopher Stroud and Dr. Peter Tan Kok Wan, the other members of my thesis committee, for their encouragement, which has made the completion of this work possible. I have greatly benefited from discussions with Professor Desmond Allison, Associate Professor Paul Matsuda, Professor Ken Hyland, Professor Tony Silva, Dr. Paul Bruthiaux, Dr Lawe-Davies, and Ms. Juno Price during the initial stages of the work, while shaping the research proposal. Their suggestions were very helpful in guiding me to current literature in the area of study. I am indebted to the National University of Singapore (NUS) for offering me both admission and a research scholarship to enable me to conduct the study. I am thankful to my mates in the Department of English Language and Literature – Ms. Anggara Mah and Ms. Jennifer Tan – and fellow students from other departments in NUS – Mr. Edward Bannerman-Wood, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Youtube and the Vernacular Rhetorics of Web 2.0
    i REMEDIATING DEMOCRACY: YOUTUBE AND THE VERNACULAR RHETORICS OF WEB 2.0 Erin Dietel-McLaughlin A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2010 Committee: Kristine Blair, Advisor Louisa Ha Graduate Faculty Representative Michael Butterworth Lee Nickoson ii ABSTRACT Kristine Blair, Advisor This dissertation examines the extent to which composing practices and rhetorical strategies common to ―Web 2.0‖ arenas may reinvigorate democracy. The project examines several digital composing practices as examples of what Gerard Hauser (1999) and others have dubbed ―vernacular rhetoric,‖ or common modes of communication that may resist or challenge more institutionalized forms of discourse. Using a cultural studies approach, this dissertation focuses on the popular video-sharing site, YouTube, and attempts to theorize several vernacular composing practices. First, this dissertation discusses the rhetorical trope of irreverence, with particular attention to the ways in which irreverent strategies such as new media parody transcend more traditional modes of public discourse. Second, this dissertation discusses three approaches to video remix (collection, Detournement, and mashing) as political strategies facilitated by Web 2.0 technologies, with particular attention to the ways in which these strategies challenge the construct of authorship and the power relationships inherent in that construct. This dissertation then considers the extent to which sites like YouTube remediate traditional rhetorical modes by focusing on the genre of epideictic rhetoric and the ways in which sites like YouTube encourage epideictic practice. Finally, in light of what these discussions reveal in terms of rhetorical practice and democracy in Web 2.0 arenas, this dissertation offers a concluding discussion of what our ―Web 2.0 world‖ might mean for composition studies in terms of theory, practice, and the teaching of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of Student Essays
    Volunteer State Community College Best of Student Essays from the 2014-2015 Academic Year Expository Essays & Research Writing This publication is made possible with funding from the VSCC Humanities Division, Department of English Faculty, and the support of Bedford/St. Martin’s Publishers. Acknowledgements Dean of Humanities: Alycia Ehlert, Ed.D. English Department Chair: Laura Black Best Essays Committee Chair: Leslie LaChance Best Essays Selection Committee: Laura Black, Jessica Cocita, Mickey Hall, Deborah Moore, Kelly Ormsby, Jaime Sanchez, Cynthia Wyatt Support Staff: Rhonda Custer, Debra Lindsay Editing and Layout: Leslie LaChance Production and Design: Eric Melcher, Coordinator of Communications ii Introduction Volunteer State Community College Best Essays is a new incarnation of a previous publication entitled VSCC English Department’s Best Essays. As the early version has done over the past decade, this publication will continue to showcase some of the best writing being done by students at Volunteer State, and we have just expanded the publication to include examples of excellent writing from a variety of academic disciplines. While much of the work appearing here is nominated by faculty in the Department of English, which publishes this book, faculty from other disciplines are now also invited to nominate student essays for collection. This year, we are pleased to include our first essay from a discipline other than English, “Patriarchy’s Roots,” written by Amy Leu for History 1110, World Civilization 1. Each year, instructors at Volunteer State nominate students who have demonstrated excellence in writing and invite them to submit an essay to our selection committee; that committee of Vol State faculty then works collaboratively to choose superior student work for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Rhetoric: the Art of Thinking Being
    BLACK RHETORIC: THE ART OF THINKING BEING by APRIL LEIGH KINKEAD Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2013 Copyright © by April Leigh Kinkead 2013 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the guidance, advice, and support of others. I would like to thank my advisor, Cedrick May, for his taking on the task of directing my dissertation. His knowledge, advice, and encouragement helped to keep me on track and made my completing this project possible. I am grateful to Penelope Ingram for her willingness to join this project late in its development. Her insights and advice were as encouraging as they were beneficial to my project’s aims. I am indebted to Kevin Gustafson, whose careful reading and revisions gave my writing skills the boost they needed. I am a better writer today thanks to his teachings. I also wish to extend my gratitude to my school colleagues who encouraged me along the way and made this journey an enjoyable experience. I also wish to thank the late Emory Estes, who inspired me to pursue graduate studies. I am equally grateful to Luanne Frank for introducing me to Martin Heidegger’s theories early in my graduate career. This dissertation would not have come into being without that introduction or her guiding my journey through Heidegger’s theories. I must also thank my family and friends who have stood by my side throughout this long journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Description, Narrative, and Reflection
    EmpoWord: A Student-Centered Anthology & Handbook for College Writers Part One: Description, Narrative, and Reflection Author: Shane Abrams, Portland State University This chapter is licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Download this book free at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/pdxopen/20/ Part One: Description, Narration, and Reflection 55 Section Introduction: Description, Narration, and Reflection Chapter Vocabulary Vocabulary Definition a rhetorical mode that emphasizes eye-catching, specific, and vivid description portrayal of a subject. Often integrates imagery and thick description to this end. a rhetorical mode involving the construction and relation of stories. narration Typically integrates description as a technique. a rhetorical gesture by which an author looks back, through the diegetic gap, to demonstrate knowledge or understanding gained from the subject on which they are reflecting. May also include consideration of reflection the impact of that past subject on the author’s future—“Looking back in order to look forward.” the circumstances in which rhetoric is produced, understood using the constituent elements of subject, occasion, audience, and purpose. Each element of the rhetorical situation carries assumptions and imperatives rhetorical situation about the kind of rhetoric that will be well received. Rhetorical situation will also influence mode and medium. Storytelling is one of few rituals that permeates all cultures. Indeed, there’s nothing quite as satisfying as a well-told story. But what exactly makes for a well-told story? Of course, the answer to that question depends on your rhetorical situation: your audience, your sociohistorical position, and your purpose will determine how you tell your story.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Wargaming Works Peter P
    Naval War College Review Volume 64 Article 8 Number 3 Summer 2011 Why Wargaming Works Peter P. Perla ED McGrady Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Perla, Peter P. and McGrady, ED (2011) "Why Wargaming Works," Naval War College Review: Vol. 64 : No. 3 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol64/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Perla and McGrady: Why Wargaming Works WHY WARGAMING WORKS Peter P. Perla and ED McGrady argaming has a long history as an important tool for military training, 1 Weducation, and research. In its broader application to nonmilitary con- flict situations (see, for example, the recent books Wargaming for Leaders and Business War Games), the technique is increasing in popularity, particularly 2 among businesses seeking strategic advantages. (As a result, we will sometimes use the terms “wargaming” and “gaming” interchangeably; in the latter case, however, we mean what is called “serious gaming,” not the more general sense, 3 like gambling.) Despite that history and popularity, however, wargaming’s rec- ord of success is uneven. Some games seem to succeed very well in preparing im- Dr. Perla earned a PhD in statistics from Carnegie- portant decision makers for real-world environments Mellon University.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Alumni Dissertation Abstracts 2009-2018
    English Department: PhD Alumni Dissertation Abstracts 2009-2018 Creel, James Wright. Rhetorics of Integrity: Constitutive Rhetoric in American Cinema and Television (2018) This dissertation addresses the ways in which Americans navigate between their gendered, raced, and national identities, and the role film and television play in that navigation. To do so, I draw from and build upon Maurice Charland's concept "constitutive rhetoric," which theorizes the construction of national identity as a process of interpellation, where a particular facet of identity is hailed as always already extant. But whereas Charland deals exclusively with symbolic identity, I argue that the premises for constitutive rhetoric also extend into the material world because identity is also a material, embodied phenomenon. As a result, I assert that scholars of rhetoric and culture can better conceptualize human bodies as material constructs, and material constructs (national monuments, statues) as bodies. Because identity is material, the calls to identification in constitutive rhetoric are simultaneously calls to embodiment, and a call to shift bodies is understandably often met with resistance. To explain this resistance, I develop a theory called "rhetorics of integrity," which are discursive and non-discursive appeals that privilege consistency and wholeness. Using this theory, I identify appeals to integrity in portrayals of raced, gendered, and national bodies in American cinema; in particular, I analyze how and why these bodies are destroyed and what interests are served by having certain bodies remain whole. Hakimi-Hood, Heidi Sabreena-Del. Locating Rural Cosmopolitanism in Long Nineteenth-Century British Writings (2018) The rural is often understood as marginalized, on the edges of cities, and rarely visible in print culture centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Devices and Terms Terminology J. Ritterson Washburn
    Rhetorical Devices and Terms J. Ritterson Terminology Washburn High School English Department Basic Abstract Not related to the concrete properties of an object; pertaining to ideas, concepts, or qualities, as opposed to physical attributes. Alliteration The repetition of initial consonant sounds or any vowel sounds within a formal grouping, such as a poetic line or stanza, or in close proximity in prose. Analytical A style of writing in which the subject is broken into its writing components and the components are subjected to detailed scrutiny. Anecdote A brief story or tale told by a character in a piece of literature. Antagonist Character or force in a literary work that opposes the main character, or protagonist. Argumentation is one of the four modes of discourse (see Description, Exposition, and Narration). It seeks to convince the reader of the truth or falseness of an idea. Writers sometimes accomplish this by appealing to readers' emotions as Orwell does in "Marrakech" or by appealing to readers' ethics as is the case in "None of This Is Fair" by Richard Rodriguez. Others, such as Andrew Hacker in "E.R.A.—R.I.P.," can argue for or against a volatile issue by appealing to the readers' sense of reason, though often in an argument these appeals are interrelated. Audience The person(s) reached by a piece of writing. Claim An assertion of something as fact; to demand as a right or as due. Closure Bringing to an end or conclusion. Coherence indicates an orderly relationship among the parts in a whole essay or other literary work.
    [Show full text]
  • Metonymy & Trauma
    ii METONYMY & TRAUMA RE-PRESENTING DEATH IN THE LITERATURE OF W. G. S E B A L D Andrew Michael Watts A research dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD English University of New South Wales 2006 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: WATTS First name: ANDREW Other names: MICHAEL Abbreviation for degree as given in the University Calendar: PhD School: ENGLISH Faculty: ARTS Title: Metonymy & Trauma: Re-presenting Death in the Literature of W. G. Sebald Abstract 350 words maximim: (PLEASE TYPE) Novel: Fragments of a Former Moon The novel Fragments of a Former Moon (FFM) invokes the paradoxical earlier death of the still-living protagonist. The unmarried German woman is told that her skeletal remains have been discovered in Israel, thirty-eight years since her body was interred in 1967. This absurd premise raises issues of representing death in contemporary culture; death's destabilising effect on the individual's textual representation; post-Enlightenmentdissolution of the modern rational self; and problems of mimetic post- Holocaust representation. Using W G Sebald's fiction as a point of departure, FFM's photographic illustrations connote modes of textual representation that disrupt the autobiographical self, invoking mortality and its a-temporal (representational) displacement. As with Sebald's recurring references to the Holocaust, FFM depicts a psychologically unstable protagonist seeking to recover repressed memories of an absent past. Research dissertation: Metonymy &Trauma: Re-presenting Death in the Literature of W. G. Sebald The dissertation centres on the effect of metonymy in the rhetoric of textually-constructedidentity and its contemporary representation in the face of death.
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Genres and Rhetorical Modes in the Humanities and Social Sciences
    Preferred genres and rhetorical modes in the humanities and social sciences Adelia Carstens Unit for Academic Literacy University of Pretoria [email protected] Abstract The article reports on a research project aimed at identifying salient written genres and text types/rhetorical modes in the Faculty of Humanities at a large university in Gauteng, South Africa. The main purpose of the research was to establish an empirical base for the design of intermediate-level undergraduate language courses. A survey was done by means of text analysis: study guides were requested from a representative sample of departments, after which writing prompts were identified and analysed using Wordsmith Tools. In terms of genre it has been established that the humanities prefer essays and critical analyses, while the social sciences prefer project reports and essays. The rhetorical modes required most frequently at undergraduate level are discussion, analysis, argumentation, explanation and description. Discussion, explanation and argumentation are favoured by academic essays, while description and evaluation are favoured by reports, and analysis, argumentation and discussion are favoured by critical analyses. Although most essays presuppose argumentation, it is often not explicated in writing prompts. Other complicating factors are the ambiguity and hidden assumptions associated with certain rhetorical verbs. The outcomes of the research suggest two possible approaches to designing writing courses for undergraduate students in the humantities and social sciences: semi-generic approach, of which the latter may be more feasible within the framework of a macro- university. Key words: academic essay, academic writing, genre, humanities, rhetorical mode, social sciences, text type Introduction This article reports on a research project aimed at gaining an impression of the written genres and rhetorical modes that are required by academic departments in a faculty of humanities at a large urban university, through examining a corpus of writing assignments included in study manuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multimodal Kitchen: Cookbooks As Women's Rhetorical Practice
    THE MULTIMODAL KITCHEN: COOKBOOKS AS WOMEN'S RHETORICAL PRACTICE Elizabeth J. Fleitz A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2009 Committee: Sue Carter Wood, Advisor Allie L. Terry Graduate Faculty Representative Kristine L. Blair Richard C. Gebhardt Lucy L. Long ii ABSTRACT Sue Carter Wood, Advisor This study positions cookbooks and their associated discourse as rhetorical, relevant to the field and worthy of scholarly study. I argue that cookbooks are more than a simple collection of recipes; the ways in which the texts construct and are constructed by society establish their significance as rhetorical texts. As women have been historically silenced and prevented from using dominant communicative methods, they have needed to develop alternative practices. Naming cooking as a women’s discourse created out of these alternative practices, I argue this form of communication constructed for women and by women has a powerful rhetorical impact which establishes women as experts within their own (private) sphere. This discourse not only enables women to value their own existence but it also gives them a space in which to perform rhetoric, in effect constructing a feminist practice. This analysis is based on synthesis between Certeau’s concept of “making do” and multimodal practice, as I argue cookery discourse is inherently multimodal. I develop my argument exploring what I identify as the major modes used in the discourse: social, visual, and performative. As my project works to extend theories of multimodality, making the concept more widely applicable in rhetorical scholarship, it also furthers work begun by Bizzell, Glenn, and others concerning the limited representation of women in the rhetorical canon, and aids in the rewriting of rhetorical history as women’s stories continue to be added.
    [Show full text]
  • Ap English Language and Composition Summer Homework 2020
    AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION SUMMER HOMEWORK 2020 Dear Students, Welcome to AP Lang. Your first task will be to complete the summer homework. To do this, you will need to purchase the following three titles: The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Born a ​ ​ ​ Crime by Trevor Noah, and Lies My Teacher Told Me by James Loewen. Lies My Teacher Told Me ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ has many editions. Please purchase an edition published after 2006. Earlier additions are missing some of the chapters that we study. For each book, you should read and mark the text. Suggestions for markings include … a. underlining words that you do not know and looking them up. b. circling words with powerful connotations and deciding what they reveal about the characters or the narrator. c. highlighting literary devices and identifying them in the margins. d. highlighting unique sentence patterns and attempting to identify them using the glossary. Your summer homework is intended to be an individual, not collaborative, effort. At the completion of The Great Gatsby and Born a Crime, you should write a 40-minute timed ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ essay. Write each on loose-leaf paper using a blue or black ink pen. TIMED WRITING PROMPTS *Prior to writing this essay, please review the AP Essay Structures Chart included below. Born a Crime "Language, even more than color, defines who we are as people,” Noah writes. “Maybe I didn't look like you, but if I spoke like you, I was you." Do you agree with Noah? In a well-organized essay, defend, challenge, or qualify Noah’s statement about the relationship between language and humanity.
    [Show full text]