DOCSLIB.ORG

Explaining the Reason Why He Had Abstained in the Vote The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explaining the Reason Why He Had Abstained in the Vote The ~~~~~~~~~ the principle that no State or group of Slalcs has the On 15 December I Y75 the Security C’ouncil (‘otnrr~it rlRh[ 10 iilcrucnc, directly or indrrcctly. for any rcawn whatcvcr. in tee established in pursuance of rcsoluticbn !$ I ( I’)(rX) the rnrcrnal or external affarrs of any other State. concerning the question of Southern Rhodcsi;r suhrnil- Rrco//ing o/ro the inherent and lawful right of every State. in the ted to the Security Council a spcci;r) rcpclrt (S/l IYI !) ckcrcrsc of its sovereignty. IO rcqucst assistance from any other State containing a recommendation for the expnnsion of or group of Stales. ~co,,ng in mrnd that all Mcmbcr States must refrain in their sanctions against the illegal regime in Southern Rhtdc- international rclatrons from the thrcar or use of force against the sia. The report stated that the Committee had consid- tcrritoria) integrity or politrcal independence of any State. or in any ered a wide range of proposals IO that end, but had other manner inconsrstcnt with the purposes of the United Nations. managed to reach agreement, subject to rescrvntions GIUV~/Y roncrrnrd at the acts of aggression committed by South entered by certain delegations, on the rccommend;rtion Africa against the People’s Republic of Angola and the violation of 11s that insurance, trade names and franchises should bc sovcrcignty and territorial integrity. Condrmning the utilrzation by South Africa of the international included within the scope of mandatory sanctions Territory of h’amibra IO mount that agprcssion. against Southern Rhodesia.“‘” (;raw/,r concrmrd o/so at the damage and destruction done by the At the 1907th meeting on 6 April 1976. IIIC Scctrrity South African n-wading forces in Angola and by their scirurc of Council decided to include the (‘ornmittcc.‘\ ~~CCI.I\ Angolan cqurpmcnt and matcrral~. report in its agend;t. which was adop~cd without objcc- ~Vorrng the letter of the Pcrmancnt Rcprcwntativc of South Afrrcu lion.ll” regarding the withdrawal of South African troops. I Condrmns South hfrrca’s aggression against the Pcoplc’s At the same meeting the President of the Security Rcpublrc of Angola; Council announced that, as a result of intensive consul- 2 Drmundl that South Africa ssrupulourly rcspcct the indcpcn- tations on certain recommendations contained in the dcncc, sovcrcignty and territorial integrity of the Pcoplc’s Republic of special report, agreement had been reached on the text Angola; of a draft resolution (S/12037). which had been spon- 3. Drmonds o/so that South Africa desist from the utilization of sored and submitted by all I5 members of the Security the international Territory of Namibra IO mount provocative or Council. The draft resolution was adopted unanimously aggressive acts against the People’s Republic of Angola or any other ncighbouring African State: at that meeting as resolution 388 (1976). The text of the 4. Calls upon the Government of South Africa to meet the just resolution reads as follows: claims of the People’s Rcpubhc of Angola for a full compensation for Thr Srcuriry Council, the damage and destruction inflicted on its State and for the RruJTrming its resolutions 216 (1965) of I2 November and 217 restoration of the equipment and materials which its invading forces (1965) of 20 November 1965. 221 (1966) of 9 April and 232 (1966) seized; of 16 December 1966. 253 (1968) of 29 May 1968 and 277 (1970) of 5 Rrpurrrl the Secretary-Gcncral IO follow the implcmcntation 18 March 1970. of the present resolution Rra/firmi& that the measures provided for in those resolutions. as Explaining the reason why he had abstained in the well as the measures initiated by Mcmbcr States in pursuance thereof. vote the representative of the United Kingdom said that shall continue in effect. his Government had consistently opposed all forms of Tu&ing in/o uccoun/ the rccommcndatrons made by the Sccurrty Council Committee established in pursuance of rcsolutwn 253 ( 1961) external intervention. South African intervention was concerning the quc*tion of Southern Rhodccra rn its \pcct~l report of rightly condemned in the draft resolution. But in his 15 Dcccmbcr 1975 (S/I 1913). view all foreign intervention in Angola was wrong and Rrcrl;lirnring that the present wtuarron rn Southern Rhodcw should be condemned. Therefore, he found the draft co,n<titutc\ ;I threat IO rnrcrrurtronal pcacc and rccurlly. unbalanced. He also had reservations concerning the use .Icring under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United N;IIIo~\. of the term “aggression” since, with the withdrawal of I. DrridrJ that all Member SI~ICS shall take approprratc mea- South African troops from Angola, it applied to a sures IO ensure that thcrr n~~wnah and persons rn thcrr tcrrrtorrcs do not Insure: situation in the past. As to the questions of restitution ((1) Any commoditrcs or products cxporrcd from Southern Rho- and compensation for damages the Security Council was dcsra after the date of the prcscnt rcsolutwn in contravcnrron of not the appropriate forum for such consideration.“” Security Council rcsolutron 253 (1968) which they know or have Similar views were expressed by the representative of rcasonablc cause IO bclicvc IO have been so exported; France.ll?’ (b) Any commodities or products whrch they know or have rcasonablc cause IO bclicvc arc dcstrncd or mtcndcd for rmportatron At the end of the meeting a procedural discussion into Southern Rhodcsra after the date of the prcscnt rcsolutwn rn concerning the presidency over the Security Council contravention of rcsolutron 253 (1968): tooh place, since the meeting continued beyond mid- fc) Commodrtics. products or other property in Southern Rhodc- night ending on I April 1976 at 12.15 a.m.11~9 sra of any commcrcral. rndustrral or publrc u1111ty undertaking In Southern Rhodcsra. rn contravention of rcsolutron 253 (l96H). THE SITL’ATlO;hi IN SOCTHERN RHOUESlA 2 Drridrs that all Member States shall take approprlatc mca- surcs IO prevent thcrr wrtonals and persons in thcrr Tcrrrrorrcs from Dccisioi of 6 April 1976 (1907th meeting): resolution grdntrng IO any commcrcral. indusrrurl or publrc utrlity undcrtakrng rn 388 (1976) Southern Rhodcsra the rrght to USC any rradc name or from cntcrrng inlo any franchrsrng agreement rnvolvrng rhc USC of any trade name. “‘O For the nalurc Jnd full cxrcnt of rhc ranctron, cnvrwgcd under those Items. see the rclcbant opcrarwc pdrrgraphs of rcsolutron 3x8 ‘I:’ 1906th mrg.. paras. 245.252 (1976) subscgucntl) adopted by rhc Sccurrry C‘ouncll on rhc subject I’)” /bid, paras 2S3-254 and rcproduccd bclou “?’ For dctarl\. see chapter I “‘I 1907th mtg . prcccdlng pdr.r 2 Part II -- ,ndc mark u, rcp,slcred dcwgn ,n connc~~on \*llh the UIC or crumble the economy of the illegal rlgime if only they dls,,,bu,,on o[ an) prduc~\. comn’d~l~~\ or \crb,cc\ Of such .t” had been more efficiently and universally applicd.“J undcrrakmg: The representative of the United States said that his 3 L!,R~J, having regard IO the prlrwplc ,ta[cd I” Artlclc 2 of the un,tcd kalions Charler. Star-z\ nol Mcmbcrr of the lJnl\cd Na~~onr IO country had always scrupulously enforced the sanctions acl I” accc)&ncc with the provisions of the prc\cnl resolution against Southern Rhodesia with the exception of the importation of certain minerals from that territory Following the vote the representative of the United under United States domestic law. He stated, however, Republic of Tanzania expressed his delegation’s satis- that the United States Government of the day was faction at the unanimous sponsorship and adoption of committed to repealing that piece of enabling lcgisla- the draft resolution by the Council, which he believed tion. which should increase economic pressure against was a precedent. Nevertheless, he observed that while the illegal rCgimc and restore the position of the United the agreed recommendation from the Committee was a States vis-8-vis its international obligations.“)> step in the right direction. it did not go far enough; the The representative of the USSR expressed regret that provisions of Article 41 of the Charter had not yet been despite the binding nature of the sanctions imposed by exhausted. and his delegation maintained that the the Security Council they had not been fully complied sanctions would never achieve the desired purpose of with by certain countries. some of which were violating toppling the illegal rCgimc in Southern Rhodesia unless them overtly. It was the duty of the Security Council to they were made fully comprehensive and effectively put an end to such violations and to intensify the supervised, and were also extended to South Africa. He sanctions against the illegal rtgimc in Southern Rhode- recalled that the heads of Commonwealth countries at sia. Unfortunately. he said, the Council had on several theit-summit meeting in Kingston, Jamaica, in 1975 had occasions been frustrated in its efforts to that end by the agreed to recommend the expansion of the scope of use of the veto by certain Western Powers. His dclega- sanctions and that the United Nations General Asscm- tion believed that the situation in Southern Rhodesia bly and the Special Committee on the Situation with justified the application of the full measures stipulated regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the in Article 41 of the Charter. and had voted for the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and present resolution on the basis that it was an interim Peoples had repeatedly taken the same position. Still, he measure pending the adoption soon of more
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe.Pdf
    THE S.A. ' "!T1!TE OF INTERNATIONAL AFi -! NOT "(C :.-_ .^ FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE Ah Analysis of the 1980 Elections and an Assessment of the Prospects Martyn Gregory OCCASIONAL. PAPER GELEEIMTHEIOSPUBUKASIE DIE SUID-AFRIKAANSE INSTITUUT MN INTERNASIONALE AANGELEENTHEDE THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Martyn Gregory* the author of this report, is a postgraduate research student,at Leicester University in Britain, working on # : thesis, entitled "International Politics of the Conflict in Rhodesia". He recently spent two months in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, : during the pre- and post-election period, as a Research Associate at the University of Rhodesia (now the University of Zimbabwe). He travelled widely throughout the country and interviewed many politicians, officials and military personnel. He also spent two weeks with the South African Institute of International Affairs at Smuts House in Johannesburg. The author would like to thank both, the University of Zimbabwe and the Institute for assistance in the preparation of this report, as well as the British Social Science Research Council which financed his visit to Rhodesia* The Institute wishes to express its appreciation to Martyn Gregory for his co-operation and his willingness to prepare this detailed report on the Zimbabwe elections and their implications for publication by the Institute. It should be noted that any opinions expressed in this report are the responsibility of the author and not of the Institute. FROM RHODESIA TO ZIMBABWE: an analysis of the 1980 elections and an assessment of the prospects Martyn Gregory Contents Introduction .'. Page 1 Paving the way to Lancaster House .... 1 The Ceasefire Arrangement 3 Organization of the Elections (i) Election Machinery 5 (i i) Voting Systems 6 The White Election 6 The Black Election (i) Contesting Parties 7 (ii) Manifestos and the Issues .
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Patriotic Front in the Independence of Zimbabwe, 1976
    Z THE ROLE OF THE PATRIOTIC FRONT IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF ZIMBABWE 1976-1980 by NTHATHEDZENI NICHOLAS DANGALE Presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MAGISTER ARTIUM in HISTORY in the FACULTY OF ARTS at the RAND AFRIKAANS UNIVERSITY JOHANNESBURG PROMOTER: 1996 PROFESSOR H J VAN ASWEGEN DEDICATION Dedicated to my mother, who spent every cent she had to put me through school. May God bless you. _____,,..-----D- .0G--6=■. ii. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to my wife, Asnath Maano, and my two children, Urangani and Ipfi, who gave me unqualified support throughout my years of study; to Prof H J van Aswegen, who tirelessly made this mini-dissertation a success and to my friend Dr Deon Gouws, who always encouraged me to work hard. OPSOMMING (SUMMARY) Hierdie mini-verhandeling beskryf die rol van die Patriotiese Front in die bevryding van Zimbabwe tussen 1976 en 1980. Die presidente van die frontlinie-state het 'n beroep gedoen op die twee Zimbabwiese nasionalisteleiers, Joshua Nkomo van ZAPU en Robert Mugabe van ZANU, om 'n alliansie te vorm sodat hulle met 'n verenigde front die regime van Ian Smith kon pak. Hierdie alliansie het op 9 Oktober 1976 tot stand gekom, met die seen van die presidente van die frontlinie-state. Die alliansie het ekonomiese, militere en politieke steun geniet van die internasionale gemeenskap, die OAE en die frontlinie-state, en is beskou as die enigste mondstuk van die verdrukte massas Afrikane in Zimbabwe. Die leiers van die PF het, nieteenstaande verskille in ideologie, dieselfde oogmerke nagestreef. Hulle wou albei Zimbabwe bevry van die Ian Smith-regime.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Settlement: a Counterinsurgency Strategy by Thomas G
    Conflict Quarterly The Internal Settlement: A Counterinsurgency Strategy by Thomas G. Mitchell INTRODUCTION Internal settlements are especially applicable to Southern Africa where the independent settler colonies of Namibia, Rhodesia, and South Africa had/ have locally born settler elites facing insurgencies from the majority black populationandinternationaleconomicsanctions. Thisarticleexaminescooption through internal settlements as a political counterinsurgency strategy. It will discuss why and when internal settlements occur, who is involved in them, what their goals are and why they failed to achieve them. It will concentrate on internal settlements in Rhodesia, Namibia and South Africa, under white settler regimes, but the article is also relevant to Central and possibly South America, Northern Ireland, and East Asia. Internal settlements are particularly suited to settler regimes and pariah states — often these two groups have overlapping membership.1 Settler regimes are found where a particular ethnic or racial group has entered an area and established control over the indigenous population. Settler states exist throughout Latin America wherever a white minority or mestizo rules over a majority black, Indian or mestizo population.2 Internal settlements have a very poor track record of achieving the goals that their authors set for them and thereby serving as a successful counterinsur­ gency (COIN) warfare strategy. Because of the desire to retain power, there is always a strong temptation among ruling settler elites, especially those that are international pariahs and face economic sanctions, to resort to them in an attempt to see sanctions lifted or to avoid their implementation.3 There are abundant theoretical studies on counter-insurgency strategy and methods, most of them having been written since the early 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zimbabwean Nation-State Project
    The Zimbabwean Nation-State Project DISCUSSION PAPER 59 THE ZIMBABWEAN NATION-STATE PROJECT A Historical Diagnosis of Identity and Power-Based Conflicts in a Postcolonial State SABELO J. NDLOVO-GATSHENI NORDISKA AFRIKAINSTITUTET, UppSALA 2011 Indexing terms: Zimbabwe Nationalism State Political conflicts Political development Political leadership Elite Ethnicity National identity Nation-building Post-colonialism The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nordiska Afrikainstitutet. Language checking: Peter Colenbrander ISSN 1104-8417 ISBN 978-91-7106-696-1 © The author and Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 2011 Production: Byrå4 Print on demand, Lightning Source UK Ltd. The Zimbabwean Nation-State Project Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................4 List of Acronyms ...............................................................................................................................................5 Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................9 2. Defining the African National Project ................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • 2143Rdmeeting: 30 Apriw&Jfs~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ NEW YORK
    UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-FOURTH YEAR MAY2 8 1982 2143rdMEETING: 30 ApRIw&jfs~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ NEW YORK CONTENTS Page Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2 143) . % . Adoption of the agenda . , . Question concerning the situation in Southern Rhodesia: Letter dated 26 April 1979 from the Charge d’Afkires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of the Ivory Coast to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/13276) . NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. j ~Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/. .) are normally published in quarterly Supplements of the O@iaZ Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which information about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with .a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of ResoZutions and Decisions of the Security Council The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. 2143rd MEETING Held in New York on Monday 30 April 1979, at 3.30 p.m. President: Mr. Ole ALGARD (Norway). At the invitation of the President, Mr. Tlou (Botswana) and Mr. Komatina (Yugoslavia) took the places reserved Present: The representatives of the following States: for them at the side of the Council chamber. Bangladesh, Bolivia, China, Czechoslovakia, France, Gabon, Jamaica, Kuwait, Nigeria, Norway, Portugal, 3. The PRESIDENT: Members of the Council have Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of before them document S/13282, which contains the text Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of of a draft resolution sponsored by Bangladesh, Bolivia, America, Zambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Official Records
    UNITEDNATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-THIRD YEAR 2068MEETING: 15 MARCH 1978 NEW YORK CONTENTS Pwf Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2068) . , . , . Adoption of the agenda . , . , . 1 Complaint by Zambia: Letter dated 9 March 1978 from the Permanent Representative of Zambia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/12589) . , . , . 1 SjPV.2068 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/. , .) are normally published in quarterly Supplements of the Official Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which information about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Resolutions’and Decisions of the Security Council. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative on that date. 2068th MEETING Held in New York on Wednesday, 15 March 1978, at 3.30 p,m. President: Mr. Ivor RICHARD 3. The PRESIDENT: The Security Council will now begin (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). its consideration of the question on its agenda in response to the request by the Government of Zambia [S/12589]. I Present: The representatives of the following States: should like also to draw the attention of members of the Bolivia, Canada, China, Czechoslovakia, France, Gabon, Council to documents S/12593, S/12594 and S/12595.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles: the Decolonisation of White Identity In
    Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles J. L. Fisher Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles The decolonisation of white identity in Zimbabwe J. L. Fisher THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/pioneers_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fisher, J. L. (Josephine Lucy) Title: Pioneers, settlers, aliens, exiles : the decolonisation of white identity in Zimbabwe / J. L. Fisher. ISBN: 9781921666148 (pbk.) 9781921666155 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Decolonization--Zimbabwe. Whites--Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe--Politics and government--1980- Zimbabwe--Race relations. Dewey Number: 320.96891 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Abbreviations. ix Preface . xi 1 ..Introduction. 1 2 ..Zimbabwe’s.discourse.of.national.reconciliation . 27 3 ..Re-inscribing.the.national.landscape. 55 4 ..Zimbabwe’s.narrative.of.national.rebirth. 79 5 ..Decolonising.settler.citizenship. 103 6 ..The.mobilisation.of.indigeneity. 131 7 ..The.loss.of.certainty. 173 8 ..Zimbabwe’s.governance.and.land.reform.crises—a.postscript.201
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING and WRITING the RHODESIAN ARMY at WAR and POSTWAR FIGHTING and WRITING Luise White FIGHTING and WRITING the RHODESIAN ARMY at WAR and POSTWAR
    LUISE WHITE FIGHTING AND WRITING THE RHODESIAN ARMY AT WAR AND POSTWAR FIGHTING AND WRITING Luise White FIGHTING AND WRITING THE RHODESIAN ARMY AT WAR AND POSTWAR Duke University Press ​| ​Durham and London | 2021 © 2021 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Matthew Tauch Typeset in Minion Pro by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: White, Luise, author. Title: Fighting and writing : the Rhodesian army at war and postwar / Luise White. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2021. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020022213 (print) | LCCN 2020022214 (ebook) | ISBN 9781478010623 (hardcover) | ISBN 9781478011729 (paperback) | ISBN 9781478021285 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Southern Rhodesia. Army. Selous Scouts. | Whites—Zimbabwe—History. | Whites—Race identity— Zimbabwe. | Zimbabwe—Race relations—History. | Zimbabwe—History—1965–1980. | Zimbabwe—History— Chimurenga War, 1966–1980. Classification: LCC DT2988 .W45 2021 (print) | LCC DT2988 (ebook) | DDC 968.91/04—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020022213 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020022214 Cover art: Eleven Troop 3 Commandos at Deka on the Zambezi, 1978. Photograph by Tom Argyle. Courtesy of Chris Cocks. CONTENTS vii Acknowl edgments xi Place- Names, Currency, and Acronyms 1 1 Zimbabwe’s Liberation Strug gle and Rhodesia’s Bush War: Locating Its History 31 2 “Blood and Ink”: Memoirs, Authors, Histories 59 3 “ Your Shona Is Better Than Mine!”: Pseudo Gangs, Blacking Up, and the Pleasures of Counterinsurgency 83 4 “Each Footprint Tells a Story”: Tracking and Poaching in the Rhodesian Army 109 5 “­There Is No Copyright on Facts”: Ron Reid- Daly, Authorship, and the Transkei Defence Force 121 6 “­Every Self- Respecting Terrorist Has an ak-47”: Guerrilla Weapons and Rhodesian Imaginations 141 7 “ A Plastic Bag full of Cholera”: Rhodesia and Chemical and Biological Weapons 167 8 “­Will Travel Worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Insurgency in Rhodesia
    Counter-insurgency in Rhodesia J.K.Cilliers GROOM HELM London • Sydney • Dover, New Hampshire CONTENTS ©1985J.K. CiUiers Croom Helm Ltd, Provident House, Burrell Row Beckenham, Kent BR3 1AT Croom Helm Australia Pty Ltd, First Floor, 139 King Street, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Cilliers, J.K. Counter-insurgency in Rhodesia. List of Tables and Figures 1. Zimbabwe - History List of Abbreviations and Terminology I. Title Acknowledgement 968.91 DT962.5 Introduction ISBN 0-7099-3412-2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE WAR FOR ZIMBABWE: Croom Helm, 51 Washington Street, 1890 TO 1979 Dover, New Hampshire 03820.USA 1.1 The Early Years 1 Cataloging in Publication Data applied for. 1.2 The Establishment of a Strategic Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: Base Area in the North-east 11 84-45702 1 , 3 Operation Hurricane 14 1.4 1974: Security Force Reaction ... 1 .5 18 Detente 22 1 .6 1976 and Dr Henry Kissinger 1 .7 27 The Patriotic Front 33 1 .8 1977: ZPRA Intensifies the War .. 35 1 .9 The Internal Settlement 44 1.10 Lancaster House 55 COMMAND AND CONTROL 2.1 The Rhodesian Security Force's approach to command and control ... 60 2.2 JOC's, JPS and Operation Hurricane. 61 2.3 War Council, COMOPS and NATJOC 66 2.4 Special Forces 73 2.5 Conclusion 76 PROTECTED AND CONSOLIDATED VILLAGES 3.1 The Concept 79 3.2 Initial Attempts at Creating Printed and bound in Great Britain by Protected Areas 82 Biddies Ltd, Guildford and King's Lynn 7.2 Mozambique 175 3.3 Operations Overload and Overload 83 7.3 Zambia 185 Two 7.4 Botswana .
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet-Angolan Relations, 1975-1990 1
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H OCCASIONAL PAPER TITLE : Soviet-Angolan Relations, 1975-199 0 AUTHOR : S . Neil MacFarlan e DATE : March 15, 1992 In accordance with Amendment #6 to Grant #1006-555009, this Occasional Paper by a present or former Council Trustee or contract Awardee has bee n volunteered to the Council by the author for distribution to the Government . NCSEER NOTE This paper consists of Chapter III from Soviet Policy in Africa : from the Old to the New Thinking; George Breslauer Ed. : Published by the Center for Slavic and East European Studies; University of California, Berkeley, for the Berkeley-Stanford Program in Soviet Studies. Forthcoming Spring, 1992. SUMMARY ` This paper supplements two earlier reports by the author, The Evolution of Sovie t Perspectives on Third World Security (distributed on 2/19/92), and The Evolution of Sovie t Perspectives on African Politics (distributed on 3/15/92), and further particularizes hi s analysis by concentrating on Soviet-Angolan relations . A detailed account of those relation s from about 1970 to the late 1980's serves almost as a case study in support of the principa l conclusion of his previous two papers - that the Soviet shift from an aggressively forward , ideological, confrontational and optimistic posture to much the opposite was not tactical, an d not prompted exclusively by extraneous constraints and interests, but was importantly a product of learning from African realities and Soviet experience with them, and is therefore lasting. While already dated and overtaken by larger events, this paper provides not only a useful summary of two critical decades in recent Soviet-Angolan relations, but perhaps also a litmus for Russian Federation policies, including those presumably pursued by Foreig n Minister Andrei Kozyrev in his recent trip to Angola and South Africa .
    [Show full text]
  • Second Edition)
    Translated for CWHIP by Gary Goldberg & Sue Onslow The White Sun of Angola by Anatoly Adamishin Moscow, 2014 (second edition) Children, don't go to Africa to walk - the warning of wise Korney Chukovsky, author of a beautiful fairy tale, often came to mind when I was writing this book. But how can one not go? Whoever who has seen the primordial, captivating beauty of African lands wants to return there again and again, to one of the most complex and dramatic crossroads of the contemporary world, to this potentially the richest continent which has vegetated in poverty for centuries. And Angola? The adventures of Captain Grant’s children, and gangly Paganel’s stories of butterflies, flowers and birds created the impression of a mythical country of our childhood. But in the 1970s and 1980s we collided with an entirely different reality: the Soviet Union found itself drawn into a serious civil war in the enormous spaces of Angola, half the size of Western Europe, which grew into an international conflict, second only to the degree of our involvement in Afghanistan. YESTERDAY CONTINUES TODAY Against the background of the escalating number of international conflicts which were mostly inter-ethnic and which included the unsuccessful attempt of the US and NATO to solve one of them by force (by this I mean the Yugoslav conflict), my thoughts return to the events which occurred 25 years ago - the successful peaceful settlement in South Western Africa. The conflict there was, I dare to say, as complicated as the Balkan one; it had a static nature, and had drawn more than a dozen countries and liberation movements directly into its orbit such as the RSA [Republic of South Africa], Angola, Cuba, the US, the USSR, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zaire, the ANC, SWAPO, and UNITA.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodesian Raids on Targets in Mozambique, Zambia, Botswana and Angola
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 25, April, 1979 Rhodesia, Rhodesian, Page 29577 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Rhodesian Raids on Targets in Mozambique, Zambia, Botswana and Angola Following the Rhodesian raids into neighbouring countries described on pages 29441-42, further such raids were carried out by Rhodesian forces between December 1978 and March 1979. On Dec. 11 the Mozambican Ministry of Defence announced that on the previous day Rhodesian aircraft had bombed military barracks near the port of Beira killing 26 persons and wounding 73 others; that two Rhodesian fighter-bombers had been shot down; that napalm had been used in Rhodesian raids on Tete Province; and that other targets inside Mozambique had been bombed between Nov. 29 and Dec. 8. From Lusaka (Zambia) is was reported that Rhodesian troops had on Dec. 21–22 raided a Zambian Army training school near Kabwe, where about 50 people had been killed. In Rhodesia it was stated that in a raid on a "terrorist" base in Zambia on Dec. 22 Rhodesian troops had "rescued" 31 Black Rhodesian soldiers and civilians captured by the "terrorists". On Jan. 8 the Government of Botswana stated that a force of 100 Rhodesian soldiers had attacked a Botswana Defence Force camp but had withdrawn after a brief battle, in which no casualties were caused on the Botswana side. On Feb. 17 Rhodesian aircraft raided ZIPRA camps near Living-stone in Zambia; according to Zambian sources no persons were killed and only two were injured in this raid.
    [Show full text]