DOCSLIB.ORG

Flow Cytometric Investigation of the Size Spectrum of North Sea Phytoplankton Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flow Cytometric Investigation of the Size Spectrum of North Sea Phytoplankton Communities FLOW CYTOMETRIC INVESTIGATION OF THE SIZE SPECTRUM OF NORTH SEA PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITIES Katy R. Owen A thesis submitted to the School of Environmental Sciences, at the University of East Anglia, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, May 2014. © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 2 ABSTRACT Marine biogeochemical processes are closely linked to phytoplankton community assemblages. Cell abundance and biomass are a measure of the successful conversion of inorganic to organic carbon. Carbon estimates are therefore often used to analyse metabolism and energy transfers within marine environments, and carbon is frequently the main parameter used in ecosystem models. Phytoplankton can be divided into functional types based on cell size: microplankton (<200 µm), nanoplankton (2-20 µm) and picoplankton (≤ 3 µm). Differences in cell volume govern variations in carbon content, nutrient uptake and influence cell fate. Reduced diameters equate to lower sedimentation rates and promote participation within the microbial loop and recycling of carbon within surface waters. Larger diameters can increase settling rates, resulting in the loss of carbon from surface waters. Current North Sea monitoring and research programmes typically only consider larger micro- and nanoplankton cells, or the bulk phytoplankton community as a whole: there is little separation by functional type. Inclusion of picoplankton and the delineation of biomass contribution by cell size are required for accurate depictions of phytoplankton productivity within this region, but this is not feasible with current water sampling protocols. Flow cytometry is a new multiparametric analysis technique offering high-speed enumeration and assessment of particles. Phytoplankton cells from 2-200 µm can be easily distinguished from debris and reproducible data on cell size and pigment content is supplied within minutes. This research uses flow cytometry to provide detailed assessments of phytoplankton community structure at a range of spatial and temporal scales. Distribution patterns are related to environmental parameters and observed patterns are used to test existing paradigm and advance current ecological theory. 3 4 LIST OF CONTENTS List of contents………………………………………………………………………….5 List of figures…………………………………………………………………………..11 List of tables……………………………………………………………………………19 List of abbreviations……………………………………………………………………23 Dedications……………………………………………………………………………. 27 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….29 Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 31 1.1. What are plankton? ................................................................................................ 31 1.2. Ecological and biogeochemical relevance of phytoplankton ................................ 32 1.2.1. Photosynthesis and the global carbon cycle ....................................................... 33 1.3. Phytoplankton diversity ......................................................................................... 36 1.3.1. Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) .................................................................................. 39 1.3.2. Dinoflagellates (Dinophyta) ............................................................................... 40 1.3.3. Golden brown flagellates (Haptophyta, Chrysophyta) ....................................... 41 1.3.4. Green algae (Chlorophyceae, Prasinophyceae) .................................................. 42 1.3.5. Cyanobacteria ..................................................................................................... 43 1.4. Phytoplankton Functional Types (PFT) ................................................................ 44 1.4.1. PFT distribution .................................................................................................. 46 1.4.2. Picophytoplankton .............................................................................................. 50 1.5. The microbial loop ................................................................................................ 51 1.6. Mathematical ecosystem models ........................................................................... 54 1.7. Phytoplankton analysis techniques ........................................................................ 55 1.7.1. Microscopy ......................................................................................................... 55 1.7.2. Chlorophyll a (chl a) and accessory pigments ................................................... 55 1.7.3. Coulter counters ................................................................................................. 57 1.7.4. Flow cytometry ................................................................................................... 57 5 1.7.5. Molecular analysis techniques ............................................................................ 61 1.7.6. Remote sensing ................................................................................................... 63 1.8. Study area: the North Sea ...................................................................................... 64 1.9. Project rationale and primary research objectives ................................................. 66 Chapter 2 General methodology .......................................................................................... 71 2.1. Phytoplankton culturing techniques ...................................................................... 71 2.1.1. Media preparation ............................................................................................... 72 2.1.1.1. f/2 + Si medium ............................................................................................... 72 2.1.1.2. L1 medium ....................................................................................................... 73 2.1.1.3. K medium ........................................................................................................ 74 2.1.1.4. SN medium ...................................................................................................... 75 2.2. Culture sampling.................................................................................................... 76 2.3. Environmental sampling ........................................................................................ 76 2.3.1. Chlorophyll determination .................................................................................. 78 2.3.2. HPLC .................................................................................................................. 80 2.3.3. Nutrient analysis ................................................................................................. 81 2.3.4. Salinity determination......................................................................................... 82 2.4. Phytoplankton analysis by flow cytometry ........................................................... 82 2.4.1. Development of flow cytometry ......................................................................... 83 2.4.2. Operational principles ......................................................................................... 84 2.4.2.1. Fluidics ............................................................................................................ 84 2.4.2.2. Optics ............................................................................................................... 86 2.4.2.3. Electronics ....................................................................................................... 89 2.4.3. CytoSense flow cytometer .................................................................................. 91 2.4.4. Environmental phytoplankton analysis .............................................................. 94 2.4.5. Treatment of data ................................................................................................ 95 2.4.6. Machine monitoring and maintenance ............................................................... 97 2.4.6.1. Volume calibration .......................................................................................... 98 2.4.6.2. Scatter calibration .......................................................................................... 100 6 2.4.6.3. Laser and PMT calibration ............................................................................ 101 2.4. Statistical analyses ............................................................................................... 103 Chapter 3 Analysis of North Sea phytoplankton biomass by size based PFT during late summer (2010) ............................................................................................................... 105 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 106 3.2. Materials and methods ......................................................................................... 109 3.2.1. Data collection and processing ......................................................................... 109 3.2.2. Statistical analyses ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is Chloroplastic Class IIA Aldolase a Marine Enzyme&Quest;
    The ISME Journal (2016) 10, 2767–2772 © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/16 www.nature.com/ismej SHORT COMMUNICATION Is chloroplastic class IIA aldolase a marine enzyme? Hitoshi Miyasaka1, Takeru Ogata1, Satoshi Tanaka2, Takeshi Ohama3, Sanae Kano4, Fujiwara Kazuhiro4,7, Shuhei Hayashi1, Shinjiro Yamamoto1, Hiro Takahashi5, Hideyuki Matsuura6 and Kazumasa Hirata6 1Department of Applied Life Science, Sojo University, Kumamoto, Japan; 2The Kansai Electric Power Co., Environmental Research Center, Keihanna-Plaza, Kyoto, Japan; 3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi, Japan; 4Chugai Technos Corporation, Hiroshima, Japan; 5Graduate School of Horticulture, Faculty of Horticulture, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan and 6Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Expressed sequence tag analyses revealed that two marine Chlorophyceae green algae, Chlamydo- monas sp. W80 and Chlamydomonas sp. HS5, contain genes coding for chloroplastic class IIA aldolase (fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate aldolase: FBA). These genes show robust monophyly with those of the marine Prasinophyceae algae genera Micromonas, Ostreococcus and Bathycoccus, indicating that the acquisition of this gene through horizontal gene transfer by an ancestor of the green algal lineage occurred prior to the divergence of the core chlorophytes (Chlorophyceae and Treboux- iophyceae) and the prasinophytes. The absence of this gene in some freshwater chlorophytes, such as Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Volvox carteri, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella variabilis and Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, can therefore be explained by the loss of this gene somewhere in the evolutionary process. Our survey on the distribution of this gene in genomic and transcriptome databases suggests that this gene occurs almost exclusively in marine algae, with a few exceptions, and as such, we propose that chloroplastic class IIA FBA is a marine environment-adapted enzyme.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY
    Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY VOLUME 46 ThisPageIntentionallyLeftBlank Advances in MARINE BIOLOGY Edited by A. J. SOUTHWARD Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK P. A. TYLER School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK C. M. YOUNG Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, University of Oregon P.O. Box 5389, Charleston, Oregon 97420, USA and L. A. FUIMAN Marine Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, Texas 78373, USA Amsterdam – Boston – Heidelberg – London – New York – Oxford Paris – San Diego – San Francisco – Singapore – Sydney – Tokyo This book is printed on acid-free paper. ß 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of a chapter in this book indicates the Publisher’s consent that copies of the chapter may be made for personal or internal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923), for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Salinity on Diel Vertical Migration Behavior in Two Red-Tide Algae, Chattonella Antiqua and Karenia Mikimotoi
    Plankton Benthos Res 9(1): 42–50, 2014 Plankton & Benthos Research © The Plankton Society of Japan Effects of salinity on diel vertical migration behavior in two red-tide algae, Chattonella antiqua and Karenia mikimotoi 1, 1 1 2 TOMOYUKI SHIKATA *, SETSUKO SAKAMOTO , GOH ONITSUKA , KAZUHIRO AOKI & 1 MINEO YAMAGUICHI 1 National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea, Fisheries Research Agency, Maruishi 2–17–5, Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima 739–0452, Japan. 2 National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency, 2–12–4 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236–8648, Japan. Received 17 May 2013; Accepted 4 December 2013 Abstract: We examined the effects of salinity on diel vertical migration (DVM) of two coastal flagellates, Chattonella antiqua and Karenia mikimotoi, in 90-cm-high columnar aquariums. Experiments were performed with surface sa- linities from 5 to 32 and bottom salinity constant at 32. Cells of each flagellate were injected into the bottom of the aquarium at night and the vertical distribution of cells was monitored every 4 h for 36 h in one series of experiments, or twice daily (day and night) for 5 days in another. Ascent and descent started at approximately the same time in all water columns, indicating that difference in surface salinity does not substantially affect DVM rhythm in the two flagellates. During daytime, C. antiqua and K. mikimotoi transited haloclines with surface salinities ≥15 and accumu- lated at the surface, although K. mikimotoi required 2 days to transit the halocline with surface salinity of 20 and 4 days for surface salinity of 15. However, neither flagellate could transit haloclines with surface salinities of 5 or 10; instead they accumulated in the halocline during daytime.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Role of Dust Deposition on Phytoplankton Ecophysiology
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 9, 19199–19243, 2012 www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/9/19199/2012/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bgd-9-19199-2012 Discussions BGD © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 9, 19199–19243, 2012 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Assessing the role of Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. dust deposition on phytoplankton Assessing the role of dust deposition on ecophysiology phytoplankton ecophysiology and V. Giovagnetti et al. succession in a low-nutrient Title Page low-chlorophyll ecosystem: a mesocosm Abstract Introduction experiment in the Mediterranean Sea Conclusions References Tables Figures V. Giovagnetti1, C. Brunet1, F. Conversano1, F. Tramontano1, I. Obernosterer2,3, C. Ridame4, and C. Guieu5,6 J I 1Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121, Naples, Italy 2Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, UMR 7621, LOMIC, Observatoire Oceanologique,´ J I F-66650 Banyuls/Mer, France Back Close 3CNRS, UMR 7621, LOMIC, Observatoire Oceanologique,´ 66650 Banyuls/Mer, France 4Laboratoire d’Oceanographie´ et du Climat: Experimentations´ et Approches Numeriques´ Full Screen / Esc (LOCEAN), CNRS-Universite´ Paris VI, Campus Jussieu, Paris, France 5 Laboratoire d’Oceanographie´ de Villefranche/Mer, CNRS-INSU, UMR7093, Observatoire Printer-friendly Version Oceanologique,´ 06230, Villefranche/Mer, France 6 Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, UMR 7093, LOV, Observatoire Oceanologique,´ Interactive Discussion 06230, Villefranche/Mer, France 19199 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Received: 30 November 2012 – Accepted: 5 December 2012 – Published: 21 December 2012 Correspondence to: C. Brunet ([email protected]) BGD Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Interaction Patterns in the Emiliania Huxleyi-Ehv System
    viruses Article Emerging Interaction Patterns in the Emiliania huxleyi-EhV System Eliana Ruiz 1,*, Monique Oosterhof 1,2, Ruth-Anne Sandaa 1, Aud Larsen 1,3 and António Pagarete 1 1 Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen 5006, Norway; [email protected] (R.-A.S.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 NRL for fish, Shellfish and Crustacean Diseases, Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, Lelystad 8221 RA, The Nederlands; [email protected] 3 Uni Research Environment, Nygårdsgaten 112, Bergen 5008, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-5558-8194 Academic Editors: Mathias Middelboe and Corina Brussaard Received: 30 January 2017; Accepted: 16 March 2017; Published: 22 March 2017 Abstract: Viruses are thought to be fundamental in driving microbial diversity in the oceanic planktonic realm. That role and associated emerging infection patterns remain particularly elusive for eukaryotic phytoplankton and their viruses. Here we used a vast number of strains from the model system Emiliania huxleyi/Emiliania huxleyi Virus to quantify parameters such as growth rate (µ), resistance (R), and viral production (Vp) capacities. Algal and viral abundances were monitored by flow cytometry during 72-h incubation experiments. The results pointed out higher viral production capacity in generalist EhV strains, and the virus-host infection network showed a strong co-evolution pattern between E. huxleyi and EhV populations. The existence of a trade-off between resistance and growth capacities was not confirmed. Keywords: Phycodnaviridae; Coccolithovirus; Coccolithophore; Haptophyta; Killing-the-winner; cost of resistance; infectivity trade-offs; algae virus; marine viral ecology; viral-host interactions 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mixotrophy Among Dinoflagellates1
    J Eukaryn Microbiol.. 46(4). 1999 pp. 397-401 0 1999 by the Society of Protozoologists Mixotrophy among Dinoflagellates’ DIANE K. STOECKER University of Maryland Center for Environmentul Science, Horn Point Laboratory, P.O. Box 775, Cambridge, Marylund 21613, USA ABSTRACT. Mixotrophy, used herein for the combination of phototrophy and phagotrophy, is widespread among dinoflagellates. It occurs among most, perhaps all, of the extant orders, including the Prorocentrales, Dinophysiales, Gymnodiniales, Noctilucales, Gon- yaulacales, Peridiniales, Blastodiniales, Phytodiniales, and Dinamoebales. Many cases of mixotrophy among dinoflagellates are probably undocumented. Primarily photosynthetic dinoflagellates with their “own” plastids can often supplement their nutrition by preying on other cells. Some primarily phagotrophic species are photosynthetic due to the presence of kleptochloroplasts or algal endosymbionts. Some parasitic dinoflagellates have plastids and are probably mixotrophic. For most mixotrophic dinoflagellates, the relative importance of photosynthesis, uptake of dissolved inorganic nutrients, and feeding are unknown. However, it is apparent that mixotrophy has different functions in different physiological types of dinoflagellates. Data on the simultaneous regulation of photosynthesis, assimilation of dissolved inorganic and organic nutrients, and phagotophy by environmental parameters (irradiance, availablity of dissolved nutrients, availability of prey) and by life history events are needed in order to understand the diverse
    [Show full text]
  • Silicification in the Microalgae
    Silicification in the Microalgae Zoe V. Finkel 1 Silicifi cation in the Microalgae the cell wall, or Si may be bound to organic ligands associ- ated with the glycocalyx, or that Si may accumulate in peri- Silicon (Si) is the second most common element in the plasmic spaces associated with the cell wall (Baines et al. Earth’s crust (Williams 1981 ) and has been incorporated in 2012 ). In the case of fi eld populations of marine species from most of the biological kingdoms (Knoll 2003 ). Synechococcus , silicon to phosphorus ratios can approach In this review I focus on what is known about: Si accumula- values found in diatoms, and signifi cant cellular concentra- tion and the formation of siliceous structures in microalgae tions of Si have been confi rmed in some laboratory strains and some related non-photosynthetic groups, molecular and (Baines et al. 2012 ). The hypothesis that Si accumulates genetic mechanisms controlling silicifi cation, and the poten- within the periplasmic space of the outer cell wall is sup- tial costs and benefi ts associated with silicifi cation in the ported by the observation that a silicon layer forms within microalgae. This chapter uses the terminology recommended invaginations of the cell membrane in Bacillus cereus spores by Simpson and Volcani ( 1981 ): Si refers to the element and (Hirota et al. 2010 ). when the form of siliceous compound is unknown, silicic Signifi cant quantities of Si, likely opal, have been detected acid, Si(OH)4 , refers to the dominant unionized form of Si in in freshwater and marine green micro- and macro-algae (Fu aqueous solution at pH 7–8, and amorphous hydrated polym- et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 447:49
    Vol. 447: 49–54, 2012 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published February 13 doi: 10.3354/meps09467 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Predator-enhanced diel vertical migration in a planktonic dinoflagellate Stephen M. Bollens*, Joel A. Quenette, Gretchen Rollwagen-Bollens School of the Environment, Washington State University, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave., Vancouver, Washington 98686, USA ABSTRACT: Diel vertical migration (DVM) is a common and conspicuous behavior amongst planktonic organisms. In the case of dinoflagellates, both light and nutrients have been shown to regulate DVM, although the role of predators (grazers) has been understudied. Here we report the results of an experimental study using a system of ‘plankton mini-towers’ to examine the DVM behavior of the marine planktonic dinoflagellate Akashiwo sanguinea. A. sanguinea undertook a pronounced reverse DVM (down during the night, up during the day) in both the absence and presence of copepod predators (Acartia spp.). In the presence of copepods, however, the ampli- tude of the DVM was enhanced, providing the dinoflagellate with greater spatial separation from its ‘normally’ migrating predator. We briefly discuss the causes (cues) and ecological conse- quences of predator-enhanced DVM in dinoflagellates. KEY WORDS: Dinoflagellate · Vertical distribution · Diel vertical migration · Nutrients · Light · Predator avoidance Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION Dinoflagellates also often undertake DVM, al - though usually in a pattern that is opposite or reverse Diel vertical migration (DVM) behavior is com- to that of most zooplankton, i.e. they reside near the mon and widespread among planktonic organisms surface during the day and at depth during the night in marine, estuarine, and freshwater systems, and (Eppley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vinagre Supplement
    The following supplement accompanies the article Estuarine-coastal gradient in food web network structure and properties C. Vinagre*, M. J. Costa Centro de Oceanografia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 503: 11–21 (2014) Supplement. Additional data Table S1. List of the trophic species (groups of taxa whose members share the same set of predators and prey) used to assemble the food web networks. Mean trophic level, generality, vulnerability and connectivity for each trophic species in a food web containing all trophic species Taxa Group TL Generality Vulnerability Connectivity Chlorophyta Algae 1.0 0.0 3.2 1.6 Cyanophycota Algae 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 Rhodophyta Algae 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.8 Cryptophycophyta + Prasinophyceae Algae 1.0 0.0 0.9 0.5 Phytoplankton Algae 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.5 Detritus Detritus 1.0 0.0 3.5 1.8 Echinodermata Echinodermata 2.0 0.3 4.3 2.3 Oikopleura sp. Tunicata 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Amphipoda Amphipoda 2.0 0.6 9.5 5.0 Oligochaeta Oligochaeta 2.0 0.2 1.1 0.6 Gastropoda Gastropoda 2.0 0.3 6.0 3.1 Ostracoda Ostracoda 2.0 0.2 2.9 1.5 Cirripedia Cirripedia 2.0 0.2 0.9 0.5 Lophogastrida Lophogastrida 2.0 0.2 5.5 2.8 Cumacea Cumacea 2.0 0.3 1.8 1.1 Barbus bocagei Fish 2.0 0.2 0.9 0.5 Ebalia sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Micromonas Pusilla (Prasinophyceae) As Part of Pico- and Nanoplankton Communities of the Barents Sea
    Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae) as part of pico- and nanoplankton communities of the Barents Sea JAHN THRONDSEN and SVEIN KRISTIANSEN Throndsen, J. & Kristianaen. S. 1991: Micromoms pd/a(Prasinophyceae) ah part of pico- and nano- plankton communities in the Barents Sea. Pp. 201-207 in Sakshaug. E.. Hopkins. C. C. E. & Britsland, N. A. (eds.): Proceedings of the Pro Mare Symposium on Polar Marine Ecology, Trondheim, 12-16 May 1990. Polar Research 10(1). Micromonas pusilla (Butcher) Manton & Parkc appears to bc a prominent member of the Barcnts Sea picoplankton community as revealed by the serial dilution culture method. Cell numbcrs frcqucntly exceeded 10' cells I-', though they usually varied between 10' and 10'cells I-'. A number of othcr identifed and unidentified taxa were recorded and quantified. Distribution relative to the marginal icc zonc 15 reported. Jahn Throndsen and Svein Kristiansen. Departmenr of Biology. Marine Botuny Division. University of Oslo. P.0. Box 1069 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo 3, Norway. Introduction the presence of a number of genera and species new to the waters off Spitsbergen and Bj~rn~ya. Investigations on flagellates in the Barents Sea began with the work of Wulff (1916), who reported the presence of many species previously described from temperate waters. Meunier (1910), working in the rieighbouring area, the Materials and methods Kara Sea, likewise added to the knowledge of Water samples were collected from stations at Arctic flagellate plankton and described new different distances from the ice edge (Fig. 1, Table species from the area. Earlier investigations in 1) during Pro Mare cruises in the Barents Sea in polar oceans were restricted either to laboratory the spring (April) of 1986 and during the summers work on preserved material or to shipboard obser- (June) of 1984 and 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Prasinophyceae)1
    J. Phycol. 38, 1132–1142 (2002) DIEL VARIATIONS IN OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF MICROMONAS PUSILLA (PRASINOPHYCEAE)1 Michele D. DuRand,2 Rebecca E. Green, Heidi M. Sosik,3 and Robert J. Olson Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Biology Department, MS #32, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Micromonas pusilla (Butcher) Manton et Parke, a nitrogen ratio; Chli, intracellular chlorophyll concen- marine prasinophyte, was used to investigate how tration; CV, coefficient of variation; D, the diameter cell growth and division affect optical properties of of the mean cell; FLS, forward light scattering; G, phytoplankton over the light:dark cycle. Measurements geometric projected area of the mean cell; ␥, spectral were made of cell size and concentration, attenua- slope; ␮, growth rate; n, real refractive index; nЈ, imag- ␴ tion and absorption coefficients, flow cytometric inary refractive index; a, absorption cross-section; ␴ ␴ forward and side light scattering and chl fluores- b, scattering cross-section; c, attenuation cross-sec- cence, and chl and carbon content. The refractive in- tion; Qa, efficiency factor for absorption; Qb, effi- dex was derived from observations and Mie scattering ciency factor for scattering; Qc, efficiency factor for theory. Diel variations occurred, with cells increasing attenuation; V , volume of the mean cell in size, light scattering, and carbon content during daytime photosynthesis and decreasing during night- time division. Cells averaged 1.6 ␮m in diameter and exhibited phased division, with 1.3 divisions per day. Scattering changes resulted primarily from changes introduction in cell size and not refractive index; absorption Diel variations in bulk optical properties such as changes were consistent with a negligible package ef- beam attenuation (Siegel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Diel Vertical Migration in Marine Dinoflagellates Jephson, Therese
    Diel vertical migration in marine dinoflagellates Jephson, Therese 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Jephson, T. (2012). Diel vertical migration in marine dinoflagellates. Department of Biology, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Diel vertical migration in marine dinoflagellates Therese Jephson AKADEMISK AVHANDLING som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Lunds universitet kommer att offentligen försvaras i Blå Hallen, Ekologihuset, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, torsdagen den 15 november 2012 kl 9:30 Fakultetens opponent: Associate Professor Tammi L. Richardson, Dept. of Marine Science Program and Biological Sciences University of South Carolina, USA Avhandlingen kommer att försvaras på engelska Dissertation Lund 2012 List of papers This thesis is based on the following papers, referred to in the text by their roman numerals: I.
    [Show full text]