Grasslands Ecosystems, Endangered Species, and Sustainable Ranching

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grasslands Ecosystems, Endangered Species, and Sustainable Ranching The Importance of Maintaining Carnivores in Wildlands (transcription) Dave Foreman The Wildlands Project I’d like to talk a little bit about another important dis- After the coyotes were trapped out, kangaroo rats were turbance regime in much of the western United States able to outcompete the other five species of burrowing and Mexico. We’ve talked some about the importance rodents. This displacement is called competitive exclu- of fire. Another one is the importance of natural hy- sion. Without the predation pressure of the coyotes on drological cycles. But an often-overlooked important the kangaroo rats, the other species could not compete ecological disturbance regime is predation. Research with the kangaroo rats. around the world and in many habitats has found the Those are just a few examples from around the world importance of large carnivores in top-down regulation of the importance of top-down regulation of ecosystems of ecosystems. by large carnivores, how these ecosystems begin to un- Jim Estes, studying sea otters off the coast of ravel when large carnivores are removed, and how these California some 20 years ago, found that when the sea ecosystems begin to regain integrity when the large otters had been trapped out over 100 years ago, their carnivores are reintroduced. habitat, the kelp forest, often called “the redwood forest Another importance of large carnivores for conser- of the Pacific Ocean,” disappeared. The reason for this vation is their umbrella effect. If you protect habitat was that, without the sea otter to control the sea urchin, adequate for a viable population of large carnivores, sea urchin populations exploded and grazed away the you are going to protect habitat for many other species kelp forest, losing not only the kelp forest but also the as well, certainly not for all species, but for many. And many other species dependent on it. Since California sea a final important reason for protecting large carnivores otters have been reintroduced in the Pacific Ocean, the is their effect on our behavior and on our attitudes. If kelp forest and other species have been coming back. there is anything human beings have too much of, it’s Yellowstone National Park lost all wolves and moun- arrogance. There is nothing quite like large carnivores tain lions in 1930. The park service trapped and shot to teach us humility. them out. Elk populations in Yellowstone National Park I’d like to show how the Wildlands Project and other grew very large. But even more importantly, elk behavior groups such as Sky Island Alliance and Naturalia are us- changed. The elk became lazy, lying in large herds in the ing these ideas of top-down regulation and conservation meadows near the rivers, chewing their cuds, overgrazing. in this area on the U.S.–Mexico borderlands that we call The area looked like one of the worst cow pastures around the Sky Islands, the area that is the overlap between the in some places. So bad was the elk overgrazing and over- Rocky Mountains and the Sierra Madre, between the browsing that beavers could not reestablish themselves in Sonoran Desert and the Chihuahuan Desert. Michael Yellowstone National Park—the elk had browsed away Soule and Reed Moss, two of the leading conservation the willows. But when wolves were reintroduced into biologists in the world, propose a scientific conservation Yellowstone less than ten years ago, suddenly the elk approach called “rewilding.” Based on the important role behavior changed radically. They were no longer big, of large carnivores in regulating ecosystems and on the fat, lazy “meadow potatoes.” They were elk again. They need of large carnivores for large, secure habitat areas were up running around, looking over their shoulders at and the fact that in much of the world today there are no the wolves. While the wolves have not caused the elk longer large-enough single protected areas, “rewilding” population to decrease, they have radically changed elk means we have to look at landscape linkages, or connec- behavior. Now the overgrazed meadows are coming back. tivity, between protected areas and other habitat. Willows are growing back up in streams and researchers Requirements for survival represent factors important believe that beavers are going to be able to recolonize to maintaining ecological health. Among these focal spe- streams in Yellowstone National Park. cies are keystone species. Keystone species, like large The last example I want to give occurred in west carnivores, have a disproportionate effect on the ecosys- Texas where coyotes had been experimentally trapped tem and other species relative to their actual numbers. out of an area that had six species of burrowing rodents. Here in the Sky Islands region (Figure 1), the Mexican USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-40. 2006. 35 The Sky Islands Wildlands Network: A proposed system of conservation lands. A Network: The Sky Islands Wildlands Figure 1. 36 USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-40. 2006. wolf was probably the most important keystone species. some of these dirt roads be closed to provide a larger The loss of the Mexican wolf has caused changes in the secure area. landscape. Recently Mexican wolves have been reintro- The Gila and the Aldo Leopold wilderness areas are duced in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New highly isolated. They are island protected areas and are Mexico. Carnivores like the Mexican wolf and the jaguar not connected to one another. We know that many species need large core areas and connectivity because they are need landscape linkage; they need to move across large vulnerable to persecution. The authors of Continental areas. This ecosystem connectivity maintains ecosystem Conservation, the state-of-the-art book on science-based flows. It is essential for the population viability of wide- conservation, say that protected areas should be roadless ranging species and it also enhances wilderness. Instead or have limited access. This was shown with the rein- of the old model of isolated national parks, wildlife troduction of Mexican wolves in the Apache-Sitgreaves refuges or other protected areas, Reed Noss and oth- National Forests. Large core areas can allow for more ers have proposed a new model where we look at the species, maintain natural disturbance regimes like fire, entire landscape, where we look at protected core areas, ensure population viability of sensitive species and en- wildlife movement linkages between them, and also at hance wilderness. compatible-use areas on private and public land around The Mexican wolves were originally released in an area these protected areas, to look at the landscape as a whole of the Apache National Forest in Arizona that had many dirt and not only for conservation purposes, but also for how roads through it. Almost immediately five were shot along- people can sustainably make a living on the landscape side dirt roads. Two others were run over. What needed to outside the core protected areas. be done was to have reintroduced the Mexican wolf in the We have been finding that to connect areas in Arizona Gila wilderness area and the Aldo Leopold wilderness area and New Mexico, looking at public lands is not enough. in New Mexico, almost a million acres of roadless country, We have to look at well-managed private lands such as much of it ungrazed by domestic livestock. The Mexican Guadalupe Canyon Ranch, owned by my friend Drum wolf and other large carnivores need these roadless pro- Hadley, and other large ranches owned by members of tected areas if they are going to survive. the Malpais Borderlands group, not to tell the landowners The jaguar once ranged throughout New Mexico, what to do with their land, but to acknowledge their ex- Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas in the United emplary management and to examine how their ranches States. It is one of the focal species in the Sky Islands and their grazing practices fit into larger conservation Wildlands Network, and conservationists in the United objectives. So instead of isolated protected areas, we have States and Mexico are studying how we can get jaguar proposed a system of public and private lands to be man- populations to disperse back into Arizona and New aged as a whole, to try to put linkages back into landscape Mexico. So we have developed a recommendation for the so that jaguars can disperse north into the United States jaguar as a focal species, conservation recommendations and that ultimately Mexican wolves can disperse south to help jaguars disperse from their northernmost breeding into Sonora and Chihuahua as well (Figure 1). I think that population in Sonora and begin to recolonize suitable all of us, landowners, ranchers, conservationists, hunt- areas in Arizona and New Mexico. Jaguar researchers ers and wildlife biologists are all interested and all need tell us, for example, that among the preferred areas for to work out an approach to the entire landscape so that jaguars in the United States are lower elevation river healthy communities, healthy families can coexist with regions, such as the Blue River in southeastern Arizona. healthy families and communities of jaguars, thick-billed This area has a jeep trail through it, a dirt road through parrots, Mexican wolves, prairie dogs and many other it. For jaguars’ security, conservationists, with some species, so that we truly can create conservation-oriented support from a few local ranchers, are proposing that and sustainable land use for the 21st century. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-40. 2006. 37 La Importancia de Mantener Carnívoros en Áreas Silvestres (resumen) Dave Foreman Proyecto Wildlands Según han demostrado estudios realizados alrededor y seguras, y en la conectividad entre áreas protegidas y del mundo, los carnívoros de gran tamaño regulan los otros hábitats.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails in the Aldo Leopold Wilderness Area Recently Maintained & Cleared
    l y R. 13 W. R. 12 W. R. 11 W. r l R. 10 W. t R. 9 W. R. 8 W. i r e t e 108°0'W m 107°45'W a v w o W a P S S le 11 Sawmill t Boundary Tank F t 6 40 10 i 1 6 Peak L 5 6 7M 10 11 9 1:63,360 0 0 8 9 12 8 8350 anyon Houghton Spring 4 7 40 7 5 7 T e C 1 in = 1 miles 11 12 4 71 7 7 0 Klin e C 10 0 C H 6 0 7 in Water anyon 8 9 6 a 4 0 Ranch P 4065A 7 Do 6 n 4 073Q (printed on 36" x 42" portrait layout) Houghton ag Z y 4 Well 12 Corduroy Corral y Doagy o 66 11 n 5 aska 10 Spr. Spr. Tank K Al 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 9 Corduroy Tank 1 1 14 13 7 2 15 5 0 4 Miles 5 Doagie Spr. 5 16 9 Beechnut Tank 4 0 17 6 13 18 n 8 14 yo 1 15 an Q C Deadman Tank 16 D Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator 3 3 3 17 0 r C 2 Sawmill 1 0 Rock 7 18 a Alamosa 13 w 6 1 Spr. Core 14 Attention: Reilly 6 Dirt Tank 8 15 0 Peak 14 Dev. Tank 3 Clay 4 15 59 16 Gila National Forest uses the most current n 0 16 S o 17 13 Santana 8163 1 17 3 y Doubleheader #2 Tank 18 Fence Tank Cr.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Wilderness
    INTERNATIONAL Journal of Wilderness DECEMBER 2005 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3 FEATURES SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 3 Is Eastern Wilderness ”Real”? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE ALDO LEOPOLD WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE BY REBECCA ORESKES 30 Social and Institutional Influences on SOUL OF THE WILDERNESS Wilderness Fire Stewardship 4 Florida Wilderness BY KATIE KNOTEK Working with Traditional Tools after a Hurricane BY SUSAN JENKINS 31 Wilderness In Whose Backyard? BY GARY T. GREEN, MICHAEL A. TARRANT, UTTIYO STEWARDSHIP RAYCHAUDHURI, and YANGJIAN ZHANG 7 A Truly National Wilderness Preservation System BY DOUGLAS W. SCOTT EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION 39 Changes in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters 13 Keeping the Wild in Wilderness When Is Too Much Change Unacceptable to Visitors? Minimizing Nonconforming Uses in the National Wilderness Preservation System BY JOSEPH FLOOD and CRAIG COLISTRA BY GEORGE NICKAS and KEVIN PROESCHOLDT 19 Developing Wilderness Indicators on the INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES White Mountain National Forest 42 Wilderness Conservation in a Biodiversity Hotspot BY DAVE NEELY BY RUSSELL A. MITTERMEIER, FRANK HAWKINS, SERGE RAJAOBELINA, and OLIVIER LANGRAND 22 Understanding the Cultural, Existence, and Bequest Values of Wilderness BY RUDY M. SCHUSTER, H. KEN CORDELL, and WILDERNESS DIGEST BRAD PHILLIPS 46 Announcements and Wilderness Calendar 26 8th World Wilderness Congress Generates Book Review Conservation Results 48 How Should America’s Wilderness Be Managed? BY VANCE G. MARTIN edited by Stuart A. Kallen REVIEWED BY JOHN SHULTIS FRONT COVER The magnificent El Carmen escaprment, one of the the “sky islands” of Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Patricio Robles Gil/Sierra Madre. INSET Ancient grain grinding site, Maderas del Carmen, Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Vance G.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Impact Reports (Firs) Are Prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for Standing Finance Committees of the NM Legislature
    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes. Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (www.nmlegis.gov). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North. F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T ORIGINAL DATE 02/07/13 SPONSOR Herrell/Martinez LAST UPDATED 02/18/13 HB 292 SHORT TITLE Transfer of Public Land Act SB ANALYST Weber REVENUE (dollars in thousands) Recurring Estimated Revenue Fund or Affected FY13 FY14 FY15 Nonrecurring (See Narrative) There (See Narrative) There may be additional may be additional Recurring General Fund revenue in future years. revenue in future years. (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decrease ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands) 3 Year Recurring or Fund FY13 FY14 FY15 Total Cost Nonrecurring Affected General Total $100.0 $100.0 $200.0 Recurring Fund (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases) Duplicate to SB 404 SOURCES OF INFORMATION LFC Files Responses Received From Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) General Services Department (GSD) Economic Development Department (EDD) Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) State Land Office (SLO) Department of Transportation (DOT) Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) House Bill 292 – Page 2 SUMMARY Synopsis of Bill House Bill 292 (HB 292) is the Transfer of Public Lands Act.
    [Show full text]
  • A Path Through the Wilderness: the Story of Forest Road
    A Path Through the Wilderness: The Story of Forest Road 150 Gila National Forest Erin Knolles Assistant Forest Archeologist March 2016 1 National Forest System Road 150 [commonly referred to as Forest Road (FR) 150], begins within the confines of the Gila National Forest and stretches north about 55 miles from NM 35 near Mimbres past Beaverhead Work Center to NM 163 north of the Gila National Forest boundary. FR 150 is the main road accessing this area of the Gila National Forest. Its location between two Wilderness Areas, Aldo Leopold and the Gila, makes it an important corridor for public access, as well as, administrative access for the Gila National Forest. Forest Road 150: The Name and a Brief History FR150 has been known by several names. The road was first called the North Star Road by the residents of Grant County and the U.S. Military when it was constructed in the 1870s.1 Today, the route is still called the North Star Road and used interchangeably with FR 150. Through most of the 20th century, FR 150 was under New Mexico state jurisdiction and named New Mexico (NM) 61.2 Of interest is that topographical maps dating to at least 1980, list the road as both NM 61 and FR 150.3 This is interesting because, today, it is common practice not to give roads Forest Service names unless they are under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service. In addition, the 1974 Gila National Forest Map refers to the route as FR 150.4 There is still some question when the North Star Road and NM 61 became known as FR 150.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar Critical Habitat Comments in Response to 71 FR 50214-50242 (Aug
    October 19, 2012 Submitted on-line via www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0042. Re: Jaguar critical habitat comments in response to 71 FR 50214-50242 (Aug. 20, 2012). To Whom it May Concern, The Center for Biological Diversity supports the designation of the entirety of the areas that the Fish and Wildlife Service proposes as critical habitat. However, these areas are not sufficient to conserve the jaguar in the United States. Nor does the Service’s itemization of threats to critical habitat areas cover the array of actions that would in fact destroy or adversely modify them. As we explain in detail in the comments below and through evidence presented in our appended letter of 10/1/2012 on the Recovery Outline for the Jaguar, we request seven principal changes in the final critical habitat designation rule, as follows: 1. The following additional mountain ranges within the current boundary of the Northwestern Recovery Unit (as described in the April 2012 Recovery Outline for the Jaguar) should be designated as critical habitat: in Arizona, the Chiricahua, Dos Cabezas, Dragoon and Mule mountains, and in New Mexico the Animas and adjoining Pyramid mountains. 2. The following additional “sky island” mountain ranges outside of the current boundaries of the Northwestern Recovery Unit should be designated as critical habitat: In New Mexico, the Alama Hueco, Big Hatchet, Little Hatchet, Florida, West and East Potrillo, Cedar and Big Burro mountains; in Arizona, the Galiuro, Santa Teresa, Pinaleno, Whitlock, Santa Catalina and Rincon mountains. Straddling both states, the Peloncillo Mountains north of the current boundaries of the Northwestern Recovery Unit should also be designated 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails in the Aldo Leopold Wilderness Area C
    l y R. 13 W. R. 12 W. R. 11 W. r l R. 10 W. t R. 9 W. R. 8 W. i r e t e 108°0'W m 107°45'W a v w o W a P S 4 S le 0 11 Sawmill t 6 t F 7 10 i 150 6 66Z M 3 Peak L 1:63,360 6 40 10 11 0 9 Boundary 0 8 9 12 1 8 8350 4 4 Canyon 7 0 7 8 T 1 in = 1 miles Spring 11 12 71 70 Kline C Tank 10 C H 677 anyon 9 a 4075 0 Ranch Pine 4065A 7 8 Corduroy Doagy n 4 73Q (printed on 36" x 42" portrait layout) Houghton y 40 12 o 665 Doagy n a 11 Tank 7 lask 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2 10 Spr. Tank K 1 A 13 9 Houghton Corduroy Corral Spr. 1 0 14 5 Beechnut 7 3 15 Miles 95 Doagie Spr. 0 521 4 16 Water Well Deadman Tank 4 0 18 17 6 14 13 yon Tank 8 15 an Q C Draw Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 12NTransverse Mercator 17 16 C 13 18 6 14 Attention: Reilly 6 231 Doagy Sawmill 15 0 14 Fence Peak Clay 4 15 59 16 Gila National Forest uses the most current n Alamosa Tank 16 13 Spr. Dev. Tank 8163 o 17 Rock Core S Santana Grafton y 18 17 r. Tank 3 n Doubleheader #2 Slash 14 13 Dirt Tank 18 y C and complete data available.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 3228 Public Law 96-550—Dec
    PUBLIC LAW 96-550—DEC. 19, 1980 94 STAT. 3221 Public Law 96-550 96th Congress An Act To designate certein National Forest System lands in the State of New Mexico for Dec. 19, 1980 inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other [H.R. 8298] purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, National Forest System lands, N. Mex. TITLE I Designation. SEC. 101. The purposes of this Act are to— (1) designate certain National Forest System lands in New Mexico for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System in order to promote, perpetuate, and preserve the wilder­ ness character of the land, to protect watersheds and wildlife habitat, preserve scenic and historic resources, and to promote scientific research, primitive recreation, solitude, physical and mental challenge, and inspiration for the benefit of all the American people; (2) insure that certain other National Forest System lands in New Mexico be promptly available for nonwilderness uses including, but not limited to, campground and other recreation site development, timber harvesting, intensive range manage­ ment, mineral development, and watershed and vegetation manipulation; and (3) designate certain other National Forest System land in New Mexico for further study in furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act. 16 use 1131 SEC. 102. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act, note. the following National Forest System lands in the State of New Mexico are hereby designated as wilderness, and therefore, as compo­ nents of the National Wilderness Preservation System— (1) certain lands in the Gila National Forest, New Mexico, 16 use 1132 which comprise approximately two hundred and eleven thou­ note.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana, and the Gila/Aldo Leopold Wilderness Complex, New Mexico
    Twentieth-Century Fire Patterns in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Area, Idaho/ Montana, and the Gila/Aldo Leopold Wilderness Complex, New Mexico Matthew Rollins Tom Swetnam Penelope Morgan Abstract—Twentieth century fire patterns were analyzed for two The objectives of our research were to characterize the large, disparate wilderness areas in the Rocky Mountains. Spatial interrelationships among fire, topography, and vegetation and temporal patterns of fires were represented as GIS-based across two major Rocky Mountain Wilderness ecosystems: digital fire atlases compiled from archival Forest Service data. We the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Area in Idaho and Mon- find that spatial and temporal fire patterns are related to landscape tana and the Gila/Aldo Leopold Wilderness Complex in New features and changes in land use. The rate and extent of burning are Mexico. Comparing results between two distinct regions, the interpreted in the context of changing fire management strategies northern and southern Rocky Mountains, provides a re- in each wilderness area. This research provides contextual informa- gional perspective. Fire-climate relationships may be stud- tion to guide fire management in these (and similar) areas in the ied at these scales. Differences and similarities in our results future and forms the basis for future research involving the empiri- enable us to determine whether fire-landscape relationships cal definition of fire regimes based on spatially explicit time-series are determined by constraints at local or regional scales. of fire occurrence. This paper describes the acquisition and compilation of GIS databases for each wilderness area, a graphical analysis of spatial and temporal fire patterns, and a comparison of patterns found in each wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Ecosystems, Threats, and Management; 1999 May 23– Lasiocarpa) (Var
    Twentieth-Century Fire Patterns in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Area, Idaho/ Montana, and the Gila/Aldo Leopold Wilderness Complex, New Mexico Matthew Rollins Tom Swetnam Penelope Morgan Abstract—Twentieth century fire patterns were analyzed for two The objectives of our research were to characterize the large, disparate wilderness areas in the Rocky Mountains. Spatial interrelationships among fire, topography, and vegetation and temporal patterns of fires were represented as GIS-based across two major Rocky Mountain Wilderness ecosystems: digital fire atlases compiled from archival Forest Service data. We the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness Area in Idaho and Mon- find that spatial and temporal fire patterns are related to landscape tana and the Gila/Aldo Leopold Wilderness Complex in New features and changes in land use. The rate and extent of burning are Mexico. Comparing results between two distinct regions, the interpreted in the context of changing fire management strategies northern and southern Rocky Mountains, provides a re- in each wilderness area. This research provides contextual informa- gional perspective. Fire-climate relationships may be stud- tion to guide fire management in these (and similar) areas in the ied at these scales. Differences and similarities in our results future and forms the basis for future research involving the empiri- enable us to determine whether fire-landscape relationships cal definition of fire regimes based on spatially explicit time-series are determined by constraints at local or regional scales. of fire occurrence. This paper describes the acquisition and compilation of GIS databases for each wilderness area, a graphical analysis of spatial and temporal fire patterns, and a comparison of patterns found in each wilderness.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Draft Land Management Plan for the Gila National Forest Catron, Grant, Hidalgo, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico
    United States Department of Agriculture Preliminary Draft Land Management Plan for the Gila National Forest Catron, Grant, Hidalgo, and Sierra Counties, New Mexico U.S. Forest Service Southwestern Region March 2018 Cover Photo: Woodland Park In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila Example
    2012 Wilderness Designation and Livestock Grazing: The Gila Example RITF Report 83 Nick Ashcroft Extension Range Management Specialist Cooperative Extension Service John M. Fowler Chair/Director, Linebery Policy Center Agricultural Experiment Station Sylvia Beuhler, Student Dawn VanLeeuwen, Professor Wilderness Designation and Livestock Grazing: The Gila Example Nick Ashcroft, John M. Fowler, Sylvia Beuhler, and Dawn VanLeeuwen1 INTRODUCTION Wilderness negatively impacts local economic The concept of a “wilderness” can stir conditions....the Wilderness designation is conflicting emotions, from wonder at the significantly associated with lower per capita tranquility and untrammeled beauty to income, lower total payroll, and lower tax the terror of a wild, untamed environment receipts in counties” (pp. 1, 3). where Mother Nature acts via spectacular The uncertainty of economic impacts and uncontrolled events. There are many stretches from local economies down views between these two extremes, and each to individual ranch units’ profitability. view is based on the individual’s intrinsic Alternative viewpoints range from adverse value system. impacts due to increased restrictions and The potential impacts on local high opportunity costs because of the economies due to wilderness designation are wilderness designation to positive impacts equally uncertain. The Sonoran Institute due to enhanced property values and in 2006 concluded “that protecting a increased local tourism revenues. This portion of [Doña Ana County, NM’s] paper examines the actual changes—due public lands as Wilderness (and a related to wilderness designation—in livestock National Conservation Area) is likely to numbers on an animal unit month per acre have positive effects on future prosperity— (AUM/acre)2 basis in the Gila Wilderness, and that the more public lands afforded the oldest wilderness area in the United these protections the better for the area States.
    [Show full text]