Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 FISHERY ASSESSMENT REPORT IFFO GLOBAL STANDARD FOR RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY OF FISHMEAL AND FISH OIL R1 FISHERY: Jack Mackerel/ Jurel (Trachurus murphyi) LOCATION: Chile -Region XV-X DATE OF REPORT: February 2017 ASSESSOR: Deirdre Hoare Global Trust Certification Ltd, 3rd Floor, Block 3, Quayside Business Park, Mill Street, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland Tel: 042 932 0912 Fax 042 938 6864 Form No: 9 Report Ref: Page 1 of 22 CCM Code: This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without the permission of Global Trust Certification Ltd. IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 1. APPLICATION DETAILS AND SUMMARY OF THE ASSESSMENT OUTCOME Name: Address: Country: Chile Zip: Tel. No. Fax. No. Email address: Applicant Code Key Contact: Title: Certification Body Details Name of Certification Body: Global Trust Certification Ltd. Assessor Name Peer Reviewer Assessment Days Initial/Surveillance/ Re-certification Deirdre Hoare Virginia Polonio 10 Initial – area extension Assessment Period 2016 Scope Details IFFO Global Standard for Responsible Supply – 1. Scope of Assessment Issue 1 2. Fishery Jack Mackerel/ Jurel (Trachurus murphyi) 3. Fishery Location Chile – Region XV - X 4. Fishery Method Purse seine Outcome of Assessment 5. Overall Fishery Compliance Rating Medium / High 6. Sub Components of Low Compliance None 7. Information deficiency None 8. Peer Review Evaluation Approve 9. Recommendation Approve Global Trust Certification Ltd, 3rd Floor, Block 3, Quayside Business Park, Mill Street, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland Tel: 042 932 0912 Fax 042 938 6864 Form No: 9 Report Ref: Page 2 of 22 CCM Code: This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without the permission of Global Trust Certification Ltd. IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 2. QUALITY OF INFORMATION Good, primarily government publications. 3. COMPLIANCE LEVEL ACHEIVED Medium Recommendation Approve fishery 4. GUIDANCE FOR ONSITE ASSESSMENT Based on HIGH compliance findings Based on MEDIUM compliance findings Based on LOW compliance findings 5. ASSESSMENT DETERMINATION Even though the current status of Jack is overexploited, the assessment team found a fully developed legal and administrative system in place which appears to be working towards the effective and sustainable management of the resource. There is some uncertainty about the biological stock but the management unit reflects the current hypothesis regarding the biological stock, and the biology of the species is taken into account in the fishery management process. Discards and bycatch sampling takes place on landing. There are no explicit management objectives for the fishery. However, the stock is largely managed in accordance with scientific advice produced using implicit management objectives based on scientifically- derived reference points. Additionally, there are generic commitments to long-term sustainability in the legislation. Research to support the conservation and the management of the stock, non-target species and physical environment exists, however research programmes could be significantly improved to decrease scientific advice uncertainty. Additional research which would improve the reliability of the stock assessment includes an improved understanding of population structure and migration patterns, location of spawning and nursery grounds, growth and age parameters, discards and under-reported catches, fishing effort/CPUE, and environmental influence on stock parameters. Since 2013, there has been a legal requirement for SUBPESCA’s technical recommendations (including TAC) to be adopted. Scientific advice is taken into account, when designing conservation and management measures, in a comprehensive manner. There is consideration of uncertainty and the risks associated with management actions in the Chilean management process. In recent years, TACs have been set in line with South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO) advice, and have not been exceeded. Mechanisms to allow for recovery Global Trust Certification Ltd, 3rd Floor, Block 3, Quayside Business Park, Mill Street, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland Tel: 042 932 0912 Fax 042 938 6864 Form No: 9 Report Ref: Page 3 of 22 CCM Code: This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without the permission of Global Trust Certification Ltd. IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 of the stock to sustainable levels are somehow established. However, there is no evidence of the efficiency of the methods used. There are management measures to prevent the impact of the fishing methods and fishing practices on non- target species and the physical environment. Measures are based on scientific information. There is a framework allowing for the application of sanctions ranging from monetary fines to revocation of licence. There is evidence of a fisheries control and enforcement regime in place in Chile, but limited information to determine how effective this regime is. HIGH Compliance B2, C1, D1, D3, E1 MEDIUM Compliance A1, A2,A3, B1, D2, E2 LOW Compliance Global Trust Certification Ltd, 3rd Floor, Block 3, Quayside Business Park, Mill Street, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland Tel: 042 932 0912 Fax 042 938 6864 Form No: 9 Report Ref: Page 4 of 22 CCM Code: This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without the permission of Global Trust Certification Ltd. IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 SUMMARY OF LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE The Management Stock assessment procedures Precautionary Management measures Implementation Framework and Procedures and management advice approach legal and administrative basis A1 Fisheries management should be concerned with the A2 whole stock unit Management actions should be scientifically based A3 Research in support of fisheries conservation and B1 management should exist Best scientific evidence available should be taken into B2 account when designing conservation and management measures The precautionary approach is applied in the C1 formulation of management plans The level of fishing permitted should be set according to D1 management advice given by research organisations Where excess fishing capacity exist, mechanisms should D2 be in established to reduced capacity Management measures should ensure that fishing gear D3 and fishing practices do not have a significant impact on non-target species and the physical environment A framework for sanctions of violation of laws and E1 regulations should be efficiently exists A management system for fisheries control and E2 enforcement should be established KEY: Low Compliance: Medium Compliance: High Compliance: Global Trust Certification Ltd, 3rd Floor, Block 3, Quayside Business Park, Mill Street, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland Tel: 042 932 0912 Fax 042 938 6864 Form No: 9 Report Ref: Page 5 of 22 CCM Code: This report shall not be reproduced in full or in part without the permission of Global Trust Certification Ltd. IFFO Fishery Assessment Report Issue No; 5; Issue Date; Jun 2015 6. RATIONALE OF THE ASSESSMENT OUTCOME A. THE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND PROCEDURE LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE A1. The management of the fishery must include a legal and administrative basis for the implementation of measures and controls to support the conservation of the fishery. LOW An administrative framework that ensures an efficient management of the fishery for its conservation is not established. MEDIUM An administrative framework that ensures an efficient management of the fishery for its conservation is somehow established, but there is evidence of not being efficient to ensure the conservation of the stock. HIGH A legal and administrative framework that ensures an efficient management of the fishery for its conservation is established and works efficiently toward the conservation of the stock. Determination: An administrative framework that ensures an efficient management of the M fishery for its conservation is somehow established, but there is evidence of not being efficient to ensure the conservation of the stock, as it is currently in a state of over- exploitation. Primary institutional framework The Chilean institutional structure governing the fisheries and aquaculture sector centers around three key organisations, with a number of other institutions providing additional research and enforcement support (such as the Navy). These three organizations have a degree of operational independence while performing a crucial and interlinked function within the broad institutional framework. • The Subsecretariat de Pesca (Undersecretariat of Fisheries, SUBPESCA or SSP) is positioned within the Chilean Ministry of Economy, and provides the policy settings and regulatory framework for the domestic management of the sector. It also manages policy direction and provides input into international fisheries issues. Law 20.657 created eight scientific-technical fisheries committees within SUBPESCA, to act as advisory bodies in the formulation of all reference points, quotas, and other technical measures. The law also rendered their technical recommendations mandatory – thus there is a legal requirement for scientific advice to be adopted. • The Servicio Nacional de Pesca (National Fisheries Service, SERNAPESCA) is also based within the Ministry of Economy. It is responsible for executing national fisheries policy, for supervising its enforcement and for ensuring proper application of the legal rules and regulations