Investigations on the Biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger Kanagurta

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigations on the Biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger Kanagurta Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics Thesis submitted to Cochin University of Science and Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY FACULTY OF MARINE SCIENCES GANGA .U. Reg. No. 2763 DEPARTMENT OF MARINE BIOLOGY, MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY SCHOOL OF MARINE SCIENCES COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY KOCHI – 682 016, INDIA September 2010 DECLARATION I, Ganga. U., do hereby declare that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics “ is a genuine record of research work carried out by me under the guidance of Prof. (Dr.) C.K. Radhakrishnan, Emeritus Professor, Cochin University of Science and Technology, and no part of the work has previously formed the basis for the award of any Degree, Associateship and Fellowship or any other similar title or recognition of any University or Institution. Ganga.U Kochi – 16 September-2010 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Investigations on the biology of Indian Mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier) along the Central Kerala coast with special reference to maturation, feeding and lipid dynamics” to be submitted by Smt. Ganga. U., is an authentic record of research work carried out by her under my guidance and supervision in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Cochin University of Science and Technology, under the faculty of Marine Sciences. Prof. (Dr.) C.K. Radhakrishnan (Supervising Guide) Prof. (Dr.) C.K. Radhakrishnan Emeritus Professor Dept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry Cochin University of Science and Technology Kochi – 682 016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to place on record my sincere and heartfelt thanks to my supervising guide Dr. C. K. Radhakrishnan, for his invaluable guidance and encouragements which culminated in this thesis. I am deeply indebted to Dr. N. G. K. Pillai, Principal Scientist and Head (Retd.), Pelagic Fisheries Division, CMFRI, Kochi who encouraged me in all my endeavours, and was a well-wisher, guiding light and mentor throughout. I am greatly obliged to Prof. (Dr.) Babu Philip who served as the Subject Expert in my Doctoral Committee, for supporting me with kind advice and valuable suggestions during my research work. I thank The Director, School of Marine Sciences, CUSAT , The Dean, Faculty of Marine Sciences and The Head, Department of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry for all facilities and support provided during the tenure of the research programme. I also place on record my gratitude to all the faculty of the Department of Marine biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, namely, Dr. A.V. Saramma, Dr. Rosamma Philip, Dr. Aneykutty Joseph, Dr. Mohammed Hatha and Dr. Bijoy Nandan for all their valuable advice and encouragement. I thank Prof. (Dr.) Mohan Joseph Modayil, former Director of CMFRI, for granting me study leave to carry out the work. I have immensely benefitted from the various interactions with respected senior colleagues and I place on record my sincere thanks to Dr. T. M. Yohannan, Retd. Principal Scientist, Pelagic Fisheries Division, CMFRI; Dr.E.Vivekanandan, Former Head, Demersal Fisheries Division, CMFRI ; Dr. K.S. Mohamed, Head, Molluscan Fisheries Division, CMFRI for patiently clearing several doubts and giving me valuable guidance and helpful suggestions. I am deeply indebted to Dr. T.V. Sankar, Senior Scientist, Department of Biochemistry, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Kochi for his invaluable guidance and help given to me while carrying out works related to biochemical analyses. Heartfelt thanks are also due to Dr. R. Anandan, Dr. P. Ashraf, Dr. K. Ashok Kumar and Dr. J. Bindu, Senior Scientists of the Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Kochi and Dr. Pramod, MPEDA, for all their kind helps and co- operation during my research work. I also thank Dr. P. Vijayagopal of the Marine Biotechnology Division, CMFRI for giving critical suggestions and advice. I acknowledge with thanks the invaluable help given by Dr. Sobhana K.S. and Shri. K.K. Surendran while carrying out the histological studies. Mr. D.Edwin, Librarian, CMFRI is especially thanked for enabling me to collect several valuable references from global libraries. Drs. Somy Kuriakose and J. Jayasankar are thanked for help provided for the statistical works. Help and advice provided by Dr. P.P. Manojkumar and Dr. K. K. Phillipose, CMFRI are remembered with thanks. I specially thank Dr. G. Syda Rao, Director, CMFRI Kochi for providing all facilities and an enabling atmosphere to carry out my research work. Senior colleagues of CMFRI Drs. P.P. Pillai, P.N.R.Nair, A.A. Jayaprakash and C.P.Gopinathan (Retd.) are gratefully remembered for their advices. I also thank Dr. E. M. Abdussamad, Mr. D. Prakasan, Shri. M.N.K. Elayathu, Smt. Rema, K.V., Shri. S. Nandakumar Rao and Shri. P. R. Abhilash, CMFRI, for their kind co-operation and helps on various occassions. Shri. K. Ganesan and Shri. K. Janardhanan are thanked for assisting me in collecting some of the fish samples during my work. My special thanks to Shri. P.V. Devassy and Smt. P.S. Sumathi, administration Section, CMFRI as well as all the administrative staff of the Department of Marine biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry and the Library section for their kind co- operation and help always. Special thanks are due to Hashim Manjebrayakath, SRF, Pelagic Fisheries Division, for taking an extra step and going that extra mile to help always. Shri. Akhilesh, K.V., Rajool Shanis, Bineesh. K.K., Mrs. Beni. N., and Manju Sebastine, the young and energetic SRFs of the Pelagic Fisheries Division are thanked for cheerfully chipping in with their helps whenever and wherever requested. Sincere thanks to all my friends, especially, Smt. Jenni B, Dr. Radhika, Cilla Abraham, Dr. Priyalekshmi, Dr. Anjana Mohan, Smt. N.R. Lethadevi and Smt. Bindu Sanjeev for their affection and concerned help rendered on several occassions. I profusely thank my family, especially my parents Mrs. Geetha and Mr. T. Upendra Prabhu and my parents-in –law, Mrs. Sumangali and Mr. H. Janardhan Bhat for all their blessful kindness, understanding and encouragement throughout. Last but not least, I owe special thanks to my husband Dr. J. Jagannath Bhat and my daughters Srijitha and Anusree for all their affection, kind concerns and patience throughout. Ganga .U INDEX i. List of Tables ii. List of plates and Figures iii. List of Abbreviations CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 - 12 CHAPTER 2 MATURATION DYNAMICS 2.1. Introduction 13 2.2. Review of Literature 15 2.3. Materials & Methods 32 2.4. Results 35 2.5. Discussion 47 CHAPTER 3 FOOD AND FEEDING DYNAMICS 3.1. Introduction- 58 3.2. Review of Literature 59 3.3. Materials & Methods 67 3.4. Results 71 3.5. Discussion 83 CHAPTER 4 LIPID DYNAMICS 4.1. Introduction 91 4.2. Review of Literature 92 4.3. Materials & Methods 102 4.4. Results 104 4.5. Discussion 117 CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 127 - 130 REFERENCES 131 - 159 LIST OF PLATES & FIGURES Plate 1 Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1817). Plate 2 Different size groups of R. kanagurta occurring in the mackerel landings Plate.3 Macroscopic gonad staging of female mackerel A. Maturing (early stage) B. Ripe and C. Spent Plate 4 Snapshots of mackerel diet indicating dominance of (A) phytoplankton, (B) copepods and (C) detritus Fig. 1.1 All India landings (t) of Indian mackerel during 1985 -2009 Fig.1.2 Seasonal length frequency distribution of mackerel caught by ring seines and trawls along the Central Kerala coast (2004 - 2008 average) Fig. 1.3 Map showing location of study area Fig. 2.1 Monthly occurrence of the various maturity stages of R.kanagurta Fig. 2.2 GSI of various maturity stages of male R.kanagurta indicating maximum, minimum and mean values (vertical bars) Fig. 2.3 GSI of various maturity stages of female R.kanagurta indicating maximum, minimum and mean values (vertical bars) Fig. 2.4 Pooled oocyte diameter frequency distribution of mackerel in Maturing (early) n=16; Maturing (late) n= 14; Ripe (n= 12) and partially spent (n=15) stages. Fig.2.5A Ripe ovary (stage F3) with mature oocytes (R ) and a few empty follicles (E) indicating ovulated eggs Fig 2.5B Spent ovary characterized by very small immature previtellogenic (PV) oocytes as well as atretic vitellogenic (AV) oocytes Fig. 2.6 Various stages in oocyte development. Fig. 2.6.a Characteristic hydrated oocyte (HY) and vitellogenic (LD, YG) oocytes in a ripe ovary Fig.2.7 Estimated Length at first maturity (Lm) during the different years 2005 to 2008. Fig. 2.8 Scatterplot showing relationship of fecundity to total Length in R.kanagurta. Fig. 2.9 Scatterplot showing relationship of fecundity with total weight (gm) in R. kanagurta. Fig.3.1 Feeding intensity (% numbers) in relation to seasons Fig. 3.2 Percentage occurrence of stomachs of various feeding activity in the different maturity stages Fig. 3.3 A Size based feeding activity during pre-monsoon season Fig. 3.3 B Size based feeding activity during monsoon season Fig. 3.3 C Size based feeding activity during post monsoon season Fig 3.3 D Size based feeding activity combined for all seasons Fig. 3.4. Seasonal percentage Preponderance Index (% Ip) showing dominance of various food items Fig. 3.5 Percentage composition of diet items in the various size groups of Indian mackerel Fig. 3.6 Diet breadth (B) of mackerel showing diversity of prey consumed among size groups Fig. 3.7 Costello analysis indicating the occurrence and dominance of different prey items Fig. 3.8 Volumetric indices of various food items among sexes in R.
Recommended publications
  • LEVELS in INDIAN MACKEREL Rastrelliger Kanagurta (SCOMBRIDAE) from KARACHI FISH HARBOUR and ITS RISK ASSESSMENT Quratulan Ahmed1,*, Levent Bat2
    9(3): 012-016 (2015) Journal of FisheriesSciences.com E-ISSN 1307-234X © 2015 www.fisheriessciences.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Research Article MERCURY (Hg) LEVELS IN INDIAN MACKEREL Rastrelliger kanagurta (SCOMBRIDAE) FROM KARACHI FISH HARBOUR AND ITS RISK ASSESSMENT Quratulan Ahmed1,*, Levent Bat2 1The Marine Reference Collection and Resources Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270 Pakistan 2University of Sinop, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology, TR57000 Sinop, Turkey Received: 03.04.2015 / Accepted: 24.04.2015 / Published online: 28.04.2015 Abstract: The present study was conducted to determine Hg levels in edible tissues of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta collected at Karachi Harbour of Pakistan between March 2013 and February 2014. Hg levels ranged from 0.01 to 0.09 with mean ± SD 0.042 ± 0.023 mg/kg dry wt. The Hg level in R. kanagurta is relatively low when compared to those studied in other parts of the world and is able to meet the legal standards by EU Commission Regulation and other international food standards. The findings obtained were also compared with established allowable weekly intake values. It is concluded that the Hg levels in the Indian mackerel from Karachi coasts did not exceed the permission limits (0.5 mg/kg). The results show that the Indian mackerel appears to be useful bio-indicator due to their accumulation of Hg, however, continued sampling is required for further researches. Keywords: Mercury, Rastrelliger kanagurta, Bio-indicator, Karachi fish harbour, Pakistan *Correspondence to: Quratulan Ahmed, The Marine Reference Collection and Resources Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270 Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +92 (345) 2983586 12 Journal of FisheriesSciences.com Ahmed Q and Bat L 9(3): 012-016 (2015) Journal abbreviation: J FisheriesSciences.com Introduction exposure route possibly allowing metal biomagnification up trophic levels in the Indian mackerel R.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Prospects of Mackerel and Tuna Fishery in Bangladesh
    Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh Item Type article Authors Rahman, M.J.; Zaher, M. Download date 27/09/2021 01:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34189 Bangladesh]. Fish. Res.) 10(1), 2006: 85-92 Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh M. J. Rahman* and M. Zaher1 Marine Fisheries & Technology Station, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute Cox's Bazar 4700, Bangladesh 1Present address: BFRI, Freshwater Station, Mvmensingh 2201, Bangladesh *Corresponding author Abstract Present status and future prospects of mackerel and tuna fisheries in Bangladesh were assessed during July 2003-June 2004. The work concentrated on the fishing gears, length of fishes, total landings and market price of the catch and highlighted the prospects of the fishery in Bangladesh. Four commercially important species of mackerels and tuna viz. Scomberomorus guttatus, Scomberomorus commerson, Rastrelliger kanagurta, and Euthynnus affinis were included in the study. About 95% of mackerels and tuna were caught by drift gill nets and the rest were caught by long lines ( 4%) and marine set-bag-net (1 %). Average monthly total landing of mackerels and tunas was about 264 t, of which 147 t landed in Cox's Bazar and 117 tin Chittagong sites. Total catches of the four species in Cox's Bazar and Chittagong sites were found to be 956 and 762 t, respectively. The poor landing was observed during January-February and the peak landing was in November and July. Gross market value of the annual landing of mackerels and tunas (1,718 t) was found to be 1,392 lakh taka.
    [Show full text]
  • King Mackerel, Scomberomorus Caval/A, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast
    King Mackerel, Scomberomorus cavalla, Mark- Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast Item Type article Authors Schaefer, H. Charles; Fable, Jr. , William A. Download date 04/10/2021 08:14:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/26474 King Mackerel, Scomberomorus caval/a, Mark-Recapture Studies Off Florida's East Coast H. CHARLES SCHAEFER and WILLIAM A. FABLE, JR. Introduction reproductive capacity causing stock re­ Panama City Laboratory, began a co­ ductions and declining recruitment operative mark-recapture study on king King mackerel, Scomberomorus cav­ (Godcharles I). King mackerel have mackerel to determine movements in alla, is a coastal, pelagic scombrid been jointly managed by the South At­ both the Gulf of Mexico and along the found off the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of lantic and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Man­ Atlantic coast. Subsequently, biologists Mexico coasts. This species has histori­ agement Councils since the implemen­ from both agencies tagged king mack­ cally contributed to commercial and tation of the Coastal Pelagic Fishery erel (17,042 releases, 1,171 returns) recreational catches throughout its Management Plan (CPFMP) in 1983. from 1975 through 1979 (Sutherland range in the southeastern United States. The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and Fable, 1980; Sutter et aI., 1991; Commercial exploitation intensified for the U.S. king mackerel resource is Williams and Godcharles3). Results there in the 1960's with the introduc­ currently estimated at 26.2 million from this study indicated that the spe­ tion of large power-assisted gillnet pounds (NMFS2). cies consisted of at least two migratory boats and spotter aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Barred Spanish Mackerel, Scomberomorus Commerson (Lacèpéde, 1801) (Teleostei: Scombridae), in the Northern Persian Gulf
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (June 2017), 4(2): 162-170 Received: April 05, 2017 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: June 01, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017.02.015 http://www.ijichthyol.org Research Article Contribution to the feeding habits and reproductive biology of narrow- barred Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus commerson (Lacèpéde, 1801) (Teleostei: Scombridae), in the northern Persian Gulf Nassir NIAMAIMANDI*1, Farhad KAYMARAM2, John HOOLIHAN3, GholamHossien MOHAMMADI4, Seyed Mohammad Reza FATEMI5 1Iran Shrimp Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute (IFSRI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), P.O.Box: 1374, Bushehr, Iran. 2Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute (IFSRI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran. 3Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149, USA. 4Aquaculture Research Center- South of Iran, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute (IFSRI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), P.O.Box: 61645-866, Ahwaz, Iran. 5Islamic Azad University, Terhran, Iran. * Email: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, the feeding habits and reproductive behavior of narrow- barred Spanish mackerel, Scomberomorus commerson, in the northern Persian Gulf during five months from October 2011 to December 2012 have been investigated. Specimens were purchased from the fishermen at several landing sites. Feeding and nutrition results showed that sardines are the major prey items of S. commerson. Secondary prey species included ponyfish, halfbeak and Indian mackerel fishes. Mature females (Stages III, IV) were mostly observed between April to July. By July, most of the studied fishes were in recovery or spent stages (Stages IV, V) indicating the end of the spawning season.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Ration of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Scomberomorus Niphonius Larvae
    FISHERIES SCIENCE 2001; 67: 238–245 Original Article Daily ration of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae J SHOJI,1,* T MAEHARA,2,a M AOYAMA,1 H FUJIMOTO,3 A IWAMOTO3 AND M TANAKA1 1Laboratory of Marine Stock-enhancement Biology, Division of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, 2Toyo Branch, Ehime Prefecture Chuyo Fisheries Experimental Station, Toyo, Ehime 799-1303, and 3Yashima Station, Japan Sea-farming Association, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0111, Japan SUMMARY: Diel successive samplings of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae were conducted throughout 24 h both in the sea and in captivity in order to estimate their daily ration. Using the Elliott and Persson model, the instantaneous gastric evacuation rate was estimated from the depletion of stomach contents (% dry bodyweight) with time during the night for wild fish (3.0–11.5 mm standard length) and from starvation experiments for reared fish (8, 10, and 15 days after hatching (DAH)). Japanese Spanish mackerel is a daylight feeder and exhibited piscivorous habits from first feeding both in the sea and in captivity. Feeding activity peaked at dusk. The esti- mated daily ration for wild larvae were 111.1 and 127.2% in 1996 and 1997, respectively; and those for reared larvae ranged from 90.6 to 111.7% of dry bodyweight. Based on the estimated value of daily rations for reared fish, the total number of newly hatched red sea bream Pagrus major larvae preyed by a Japanese Spanish mackerel from first feeding (5 DAH) to beginning of juvenile stage (20 DAH) in captivity was calculated to be 1139–1404.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Fishing Effects on the Southern Benguela Fish Community Using an Individual-Based Model: Learning from a Comparison with Ecosim
    Ecosystem Approaches to Fisheries in the Southern Benguela Afr. J. mar. Sci. 26: 95–114 2004 95 SIMULATIONS OF FISHING EFFECTS ON THE SOUTHERN BENGUELA FISH COMMUNITY USING AN INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL: LEARNING FROM A COMPARISON WITH ECOSIM Y-J. SHIN*, L. J. SHANNON† and P. M. CURY* By applying an individual-based model (OSMOSE) to the southern Benguela ecosystem, a multispecies analysis is proposed, complementary to that provided by the application of ECOPATH/ECOSIM models. To reconstruct marine foodwebs, OSMOSE is based on the hypothesis that predation is a size-structured process. In all, 12 fish species, chosen for their importance in terms of biomass and catches, are explicitly modelled. Growth, repro- duction and mortality parameters are required to model their dynamics and trophic interactions. Maps of mean spatial distribution of the species are compiled from published literature. Taking into account the spatial component is necessary because spatial co-occurrence determines potential interactions between predatory fish and prey fish of suitable size. To explore ecosystem effects of fishing, different fishing scenarios, previously examined using ECOSIM, are simulated using the OSMOSE model. They explore the effects of targeting fish species in the southern Benguela considered to be predators (Cape hake Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) or prey (anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus, sardine Sardinops sagax, round herring Etrumeus whiteheadi). Simulation results are compared and are generally consistent with those obtained using an ECOSIM model. This cross-validation appears to be a promising means of evaluating the robustness of model outputs, when separate validation of marine ecosystem models are still difficult to perform.
    [Show full text]
  • Chub Mackerel, Scomber Japonicus (Perciformes: Scombridae), a New Host Record for Nerocila Phaiopleura (Isopoda: Cymothoidae)
    生物圏科学 Biosphere Sci. 56:7-11 (2017) Chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus (Perciformes: Scombridae), a new host record for Nerocila phaiopleura (Isopoda: Cymothoidae) 1) 2) Kazuya NAGASAWA * and Hiroki NAKAO 1) Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, 1-4-4 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8528, Japan 2) Fisheries Research Division, Oita Prefectural Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Center, Kamiura, Saeki, Oita 879-2602, Japan Abstract An ovigerous female of Nerocila phaiopleura Bleeker, 1857 was collected from the caudal peduncle of a chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus Houttuyn, 1782 (Perciformes: Scombridae), at the Hōyo Strait located between the western Seto Inland Sea and the Bungo Channell in western Japan. This represents a new host record for N. phaioplueura and its fourth record from the Seto Inland Sea and adjacent region. Key words: Cymothoidae, fish parasite, Isopoda, Nerocila phaiopleura, new host record, Scomber japonicus INTRODUCTION The Hōyo Strait is located between the western Seto Inland Sea and the Bungo Channell in western Japan. This strait is famous as a fishing ground of two perciform fishes of high quality, viz., chub mackerel, Scomber japonicus Houttuyn, 1782 (Scombridae), and Japanese jack mackerel, Trachurus japonicus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1844) (Carangidae), both of which are currently called“ Seki-saba” and“ Seki-aji”, respectively, as registered brands (e.g., Ishida and Fukushige, 2010). The brand names are well known nationwide, and the price of the fishes is very high (up to 5,000 yen per kg). Under these situations, the fishermen working in the strait pay much attention to the parasites of the fishes they catch because those fishes are almost exclusively eaten raw as“ sashimi.” Recently, a chub mackerel infected by a large parasite on the body surface (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries of the Northeast
    FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEAST AMERICAN BLUE LOBSTER BILLFISHES ATLANTIC COD MUSSEL (Blue marlin, Sailfish, BLACK SEA BASS Swordfish, White marlin) CLAMS DRUMS BUTTERFISH (Arc blood clam, Arctic surf clam, COBIA Atlantic razor clam, Atlantic surf clam, (Atlantic croaker, Black drum, BLUEFISH (Gulf butterfish, Northern Northern kingfish, Red drum, Northern quahog, Ocean quahog, harvestfish) CRABS Silver sea trout, Southern kingfish, Soft-shelled clam, Stout razor clam) (Atlantic rock crab, Blue crab, Spot, Spotted seatrout, Weakfish) Deep-sea red crab, Green crab, Horseshoe crab, Jonah crab, Lady crab, Northern stone crab) GREEN SEA FLATFISH URCHIN EELS (Atlantic halibut, American plaice, GRAY TRIGGERFISH HADDOCK (American eel, Fourspot flounder, Greenland halibut, Conger eel) Hogchoker, Southern flounder, Summer GROUPERS flounder, Winter flounder, Witch flounder, (Black grouper, Yellowtail flounder) Snowy grouper) MACKERELS (Atlantic chub mackerel, MONKFISH HAKES JACKS Atlantic mackerel, Bullet mackerel, King mackerel, (Offshore hake, Red hake, (Almaco jack, Amberjack, Bar Silver hake, Spotted hake, HERRINGS jack, Blue runner, Crevalle jack, Spanish mackerel) White hake) (Alewife, Atlantic menhaden, Atlantic Florida pompano) MAHI MAHI herring, Atlantic thread herring, Blueback herring, Gizzard shad, Hickory shad, Round herring) MULLETS PORGIES SCALLOPS (Striped mullet, White mullet) POLLOCK (Jolthead porgy, Red porgy, (Atlantic sea Scup, Sheepshead porgy) REDFISH scallop, Bay (Acadian redfish, scallop) Blackbelly rosefish) OPAH SEAWEEDS (Bladder
    [Show full text]
  • Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗
    Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗ I examine the estimated economic, ecological, and food security effects of future fishery management reform in Asia. Without climate change, most Asian fisheries stand to gain substantially from reforms. Optimizing fishery management could increase catch by 24% and profit by 34% over business- as-usual management. These benefits arise from fishing some stocks more conservatively and others more aggressively. Although climate change is expected to reduce carrying capacity in 55% of Asian fisheries, I find that under climate change large benefits from fishery management reform are maintained, though these benefits are heterogeneous. The case for reform remains strong for both catch and profit, though these numbers are slightly lower than in the no-climate change case. These results suggest that, to maximize economic output and food security, Asian fisheries will benefit substantially from the transition to catch shares or other economically rational fishery management institutions, despite the looming effects of climate change. Keywords: Asia, climate change, fisheries, rights-based management JEL codes: Q22, Q28 I. Introduction Global fisheries have diverged sharply over recent decades. High governance, wealthy economies have largely adopted output controls or various forms of catch shares, which has helped fisheries in these economies overcome inefficiencies arising from overfishing (Worm et al. 2009) and capital stuffing (Homans and Wilen 1997), and allowed them to turn the corner toward sustainability (Costello, Gaines, and Lynham 2008) and profitability (Costello et al. 2016). But the world’s largest fishing region, Asia, has instead largely pursued open access and input controls, achieving less long-run fishery management success (World Bank 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries
    JANUARY 2020 Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and FisheriesCrab Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries JANUARY 2020 JANUARY Prepared by: McDowell Group Authors and Contributions: From NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center: Ben Fissel (PI, project oversight, project design, and editor), Brian Garber-Yonts (editor). From McDowell Group, Inc.: Jim Calvin (project oversight and editor), Dan Lesh (lead author/ analyst), Garrett Evridge (author/analyst) , Joe Jacobson (author/analyst), Paul Strickler (author/analyst). From Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Bob Ryznar (project oversight and sub-contractor management), Jean Lee (data compilation and analysis) This report was produced and funded by the NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Funding was awarded through a competitive contract to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and McDowell Group, Inc. The analysis was conducted during the winter of 2018 and spring of 2019, based primarily on 2017 harvest and market data. A final review by staff from NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center was completed in June 2019 and the document was finalized in March 2016. Data throughout the report was compiled in November 2018. Revisions to source data after this time may not be reflect in this report. Typically, revisions to economic fisheries data are not substantial and data presented here accurately reflects the trends in the analyzed markets. For data sourced from NMFS and AKFIN the reader should refer to the Economic Status Report of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska, 2017 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/data/2017-economic-status-groundfish-fisheries-alaska) and Economic Status Report of the BSAI King and Tanner Crab Fisheries Off Alaska, 2018 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Jack Mackerel (Trachurus Picturatus) in Subdivision 10.A.2 (Azores Grounds)
    ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast ecoregion Published 18 December 2020 Blue jack mackerel (Trachurus picturatus) in Subdivision 10.a.2 (Azores grounds) ICES advice on fishing opportunities ICES advises that when the precautionary approach is applied, catches should be no more than 878 tonnes in each of the years 2021 and 2022. Note: This advice sheet is abbreviated due to the COVID-19 disruption. The previous advice issued for 2019 and 2020 is attached as Annex 1. Stock development over time Figure 1 Blue jack mackerel in Subdivision 10.a.2. Landings and other catches. Landings include purse-seine catches for human consumption – PS (HC) – purse-seine catches for bait – PS (Bait) – and include unsold purse-seine landings withdrawn at the port as well as longline and handline catches (LL and HL). Other catches include longline bait, tuna live bait, and recreational catches (incomplete in 2017–2019). Stock and exploitation status Table 1 Blue jack mackerel in Subdivision 10.a.2. State of the stock and fishery relative to reference points. ICES Advice 2020 – jaa.27..10a2 – https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.advice.7650 ICES advice, as adopted by its advisory committee (ACOM), is developed upon request by ICES clients (European Union, NASCO, NEAFC, Iceland, and Norway). 1 ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Published 18 December 2020 jaa.27.10a2 Catch scenarios ICES framework for category 5 stocks was applied (ICES, 2012). For stocks without information on abundance or exploitation, ICES considers that a precautionary reduction of catches should be implemented unless there is ancillary information clearly indicating that the current level of exploitation is appropriate for the stock.
    [Show full text]