DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Final Report European South Pacific Mid Water Trawl Jack Mackerel Fishery on Behalf of Dutch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Final Report European South Pacific Mid Water Trawl Jack Mackerel Fishery on Behalf of Dutch Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Final Report European South Pacific mid water trawl jack mackerel fishery On behalf of Dutch Pelagic BV Prepared by Control Union Pesca Ltd March 2020 Authors: Dr. L. Borges Ms. C. Seip-Markensteijn Mr. A. Karstegl Control Union Pesca Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cupesca.com QA and QC FR stage Role Initials and date Originator: Cora Seip Reviewer: Beverly O’Kane 03/03/2020 Approver: Charlotte Todd 03/03/2020 Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 7 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ....................................................................................................... 9 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY .............................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought .......................................... 12 3.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) ............................................................................... 12 3.1.2 Final UoC(s) ..................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data .................................................................................. 13 3.2 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 The Client fishery ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.2 History of the fishery and its management .................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Gear and operation of the fishery .................................................................................................. 15 3.2.4 Fishing areas and seasons ............................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background ........................................................................... 15 3.3.1 Life history ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Stock assessment ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.3.3 Stock trends .................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3.4 Reference points ............................................................................................................................. 22 3.3.5 Management .................................................................................................................................. 24 3.3.6 Key Low-Trophic Level Species ....................................................................................................... 25 3.3.7 Primary and Secondary species ...................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................. 32 3.4.1 Designation of species under Principle 2 ........................................................................................ 32 3.4.2 Endangered, Threatened or Protected (ETP) species ..................................................................... 32 3.4.3 Habitat ............................................................................................................................................ 38 3.4.4 Ecosystem ....................................................................................................................................... 41 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .............................................................. 45 3.5.1 Jurisdiction and overarching management set-up ......................................................................... 45 3.5.2 Management framework ................................................................................................................ 45 3.5.3 Roles and responsibilities ............................................................................................................... 49 3.5.4 Consultation processes ................................................................................................................... 54 3.5.5 Enforcement and compliance ......................................................................................................... 56 3.5.6 Dispute resolution .......................................................................................................................... 59 3.5.7 Review of the management system ............................................................................................... 61 4 EVALUATION PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................... 63 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment .......................................................................................... 63 4.2 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 65 4.3 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .................................................................................. 65 4.3.1 Site Visits and consultations ........................................................................................................... 65 4.3.2 Evaluation Techniques .................................................................................................................... 66 3351R05C Control Union Pesca Ltd 1 MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (8th October 2014) Pesca V1.2 (2nd October 2017) 5 TRACEABILITY .................................................................................................................................... 68 5.1 Eligibility Date ....................................................................................................................... 68 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery .............................................................................................. 68 5.3 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody ............................................................................................................................................. 72 6 EVALUATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 73 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................................ 73 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores .................................................................................................. 73 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 74 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................................. 74 7 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 75 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................. 82 APPENDIX 1 SCORING TABLES ................................................................................................................ 83 APPENDIX 1.1 PRINCIPLE 1 ...................................................................................................................... 83 Evaluation Table for PI 1.1.1 – Stock status ...................................................................................... 83 Evaluation Table for PI 1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding ............................................................................... 85 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.1 – Harvest strategy ............................................................................... 87 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.2 – Harvest control rules and tools ........................................................ 90 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.3 – Information and monitoring ............................................................ 92 Evaluation Table for PI 1.2.4 – Assessment of stock status .............................................................. 94 APPENDIX 1.2 PRINCIPLE 2 ...................................................................................................................... 97 Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.1 – Primary species outcome ................................................................. 97 Evaluation Table for PI 2.1.2 – Primary species management strategy ..........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species
    534 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Pacific, Southeast C-87 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Pacifique, sud-est (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Pacífico, sudoriental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 613 302 806 323 1 804 483 693 Tadpole codling Salilota australis 32 1 400 1 091 768 374 522 703 536 Southern blue whiting Micromesistius australis 32 23 301 19 629 16 675 15 304 10 036 8 809 8 269 Southern hake Merluccius australis 32 25 361 20 909 20 288 19 346 12 393 16 150 16 804 South Pacific hake Merluccius gayi 32 90 305 82 977 72 872 92 031 96 196 77 283 98 662 Patagonian grenadier Macruronus magellanicus 32 74 330 70 137 62 175 47 602 39 138 37 475 28 108 Chilean grenadier Coelorinchus chilensis 32 156 134 136 91 54 59 47 Sea catfishes nei Ariidae 33 406 1 426 852 876 1 217 1 185 1 285 Snake eels nei Ophichthidae 33 38 65 114 142 144 49 181 Pacific cornetfish Fistularia corneta 33 6 443 4 513 4 323 4 854 2 534 7 630 19 559 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 10 821 13 400 18 751 13 876 14 290 14 044 17 345 Snooks(=Robalos) nei Centropomus spp 33 98 104 78 136 79 310 305 Broomtail grouper Mycteroperca xenarcha 33 14 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Highlights
    Monthly Highlights No. 2 / 2021 In this issue As of 2021, the Monthly Highlights include Bulgaria among surveyed countries. According to data collected by EUMOFA from 13 EU Member States, in November 2020 striped venus and whelk together accounted for 12% of the total Contents first-sales value of the “Bivalves and other molluscs and aquatic invertebrates” commodity group. First sales in Europe Striped venus (Italy, Spain) and whelk From 2018 to 2020, the price of live, fresh, or chilled (Belgium, France, Netherlands) mussels imported in the EU from Norway fluctuated from 2,04 to 7,09 EUR/kg. In 2020, both price and Extra-EU imports volume exhibited a downward trend. Weekly average EU import prices of selected products from Over the last four years, German consumers spent selected countries of origin the most for a kilogram of fresh cod, (18,00 EUR/kg on average) compared to France Consumption Fresh cod in Germany, France, and the (16,80 EUR/kg) and the Netherlands (16,30 EUR/kg). Netherlands In 2019, the EU imports of fisheries and aquaculture products from South Africa accounted for over EUR Case studies 295 million and 80.597 tonnes. Hake, squid, and Fisheries and aquaculture in South Africa fishmeal constitute the bulk share of EU imports. Horse mackerel in the EU The largest market for horse mackerel exported by the EU is Egypt. In 2019, exports to the country Global highlights reached 54.000 tonnes, worth EUR 51 million, accounting for 50% of total export volume Macroeconomic context and 47% of value. Marine fuel, consumer prices, and In January 2021, the EU and Greenland concluded exchange rates negotiations for a new four-year Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA), which is the third most important agreement in place for the EU in financial terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients
    IFFO RS Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Fishery Assessment Methodology and Template Report V2.0 Version No.: 2.0 Date: July 2017 Page 1 IFFO RS Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Chilean jack mackerel, Jurel (Trachurus murphyi) Fishery Under Assessment Chile EEZ XV-X Date December 2019 Assessor Jim Daly Application details and summary of the assessment outcome Name: Blumar and others Address: Country: Chile Zip: Tel. No.: Fax. No.: Email address: Applicant Code Key Contact: Title: Certification Body Details Name of Certification Body: SAI Global Ltd Assessment Initial/Surveillance/ Whole fish/ Assessor Name Peer Reviewer Days Re-approval By-product Jim Daly Conor Donnelly 3 SURV 1 Whole fish Assessment Period 2019 Scope Details SUBPESCA & SERNAPESCA, Chile EEZ; Management Authority (Country/State) SPRFMO International Waters Main Species Chilean jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi Fishery Location Chile EEZ VX-X Gear Type(s) Purse seine, hand-line Outcome of Assessment Chilean Jack mackerel Jurel Trachurus PASS murphyi Clauses Failed NONE Pacific Chub mackerel Caballa Scomber PASS japonicus Clauses Failed NONE Blue fathead Pez medusa Cubiceps caeruleus PASS Clauses Failed NONE PASS Snoek Sierra Thyrsites atun Clauses Failed NONE Version No.: 2.0 Date: July 2017 Page 2 Peer Review Evaluation APPROVE Recommendation PASS Assessment Determination The Northern fishery (XV-II) is mostly within the Chilean EEZ; the Central-Southern fishery (III-X) is within the Chilean EEZ and also straddles international waters. The Central-Southern fishery is used mainly for the reduction fishery for Chilean Jack mackerel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Global Assessment of the Status of Exploited Marine Fish and Invertebrate Populations
    A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS June 30 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria. L.D. Palomares, Rainer Froese, Brittany Derrick, Simon-Luc Nöel, Gordon Tsui Jessika Woroniak Daniel Pauly A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA June 30, 2018 A PRELIMINARY GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISH AND INVERTEBRATE POPULATIONS Maria L.D. Palomares1, Rainer Froese2, Brittany Derrick1, Simon-Luc Nöel1, Gordon Tsui1, Jessika Woroniak1 and Daniel Pauly1 CITE AS: Palomares MLD, Froese R, Derrick B, Nöel S-L, Tsui G, Woroniak J, Pauly D (2018) A preliminary global assessment of the status of exploited marine fish and invertebrate populations. A report prepared by the Sea Around Us for OCEANA. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, p. 64. 1 Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T1Z4 Canada 2 Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research GEOMAR, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Material and Methods 3 − Reconstructed catches vs official catches 3 − Marine Ecoregions vs EEZs 3 − The CMSY method 5 Results and Discussion 7 − Stock summaries reports 9 − Problematic stocks and sources of bias 14 − Stocks in the countries where OCEANA operates 22 − Stock assessments on the Sea Around Us website 31 − The next steps 32 Acknowledgements 33 References 34 Appendices I. List of marine ecoregions by EEZ 37 II. Summaries of number of stock by region and 49 by continent III.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Final LOFF W/ Ref and Detailed Info
    Final List of Foreign Fisheries Rationale for Classification ** (Presence of mortality or injury (P/A), Co- Occurrence (C/O), Company (if Source of Marine Mammal Analogous Gear Fishery/Gear Number of aquaculture or Product (for Interactions (by group Marine Mammal (A/G), No RFMO or Legal Target Species or Product Type Vessels processor) processing) Area of Operation or species) Bycatch Estimates Information (N/I)) Protection Measures References Detailed Information Antigua and Barbuda Exempt Fisheries http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/FCP/en/ATG/body.htm http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/y5402e/y5402e06.htm,ht tp://www.tradeboss.com/default.cgi/action/viewcompan lobster, rock, spiny, demersal fish ies/searchterm/spiny+lobster/searchtermcondition/1/ , (snappers, groupers, grunts, ftp://ftp.fao.org/fi/DOCUMENT/IPOAS/national/Antigua U.S. LoF Caribbean spiny lobster trap/ pot >197 None documented, surgeonfish), flounder pots, traps 74 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G AndBarbuda/NPOA_IUU.pdf Caribbean mixed species trap/pot are category III http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/fisheries/tabl lobster, rock, spiny free diving, loops 19 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G e2/Atlantic_GOM_Caribbean_shellfish.html Queen conch (Strombus gigas), Dive (SCUBA & free molluscs diving) 25 not applicable not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented A/G U.S. trade data Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean snapper- handline, hook and grouper and other reef fish bottom longline/hook-and-line/ >5,000 snapper line 71 Lewis Fishing not applicable Antigua & Barbuda EEZ none documented none documented N/I, A/G U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Increasing Importance of Marine Recreational Fishing in the US
    Fisheries Research 108 (2011) 268–276 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres The increasing importance of marine recreational fishing in the US: Challenges for management Thomas F. Ihde ∗, Michael J. Wilberg, David A. Loewensteiner, David H. Secor, Thomas J. Miller University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD 20688, USA article info abstract Article history: Harvests from recreational fishing are increasingly as important as commercial harvest to populations of Received 14 May 2010 popularly fished marine recreational species. However, it has yet to be determined whether the increasing Received in revised form 7 December 2010 importance of recreational fishing is a general trend of marine fisheries in the US or whether such a trend Accepted 11 December 2010 is limited to only those species recognized as popular recreational fishes. 71% of marine species in the US have experienced an increase in the proportion of total harvest from the recreational sector during the Keywords: time harvest data are available for both sectors. Species demonstrating an increase in the proportion of Fishery management goals harvests by the recreational sector included those generally regarded as commercial, bait, and bycatch Harvest policy Life history analysis species, as well as those considered recreational species. Marine species categorized as overfished could Marine fisheries management not be predicted from either fishery characteristics or life history characteristics in a PCA analysis of Recreational fisheries available data for fished species in the US. Consequently, there appears to be little to predict vulnerability of populations to fishing efforts save that all fished species can be made vulnerable to overexploitation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fishery for Jack Mackerel (Trachurus Murphyi Off Northern Chile
    SCHOOL OF OCEANOGRAPHY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY The fishery for jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi off Northern Chile. JORGE BASTEN C. Corvallis, June 1981. 1. INTRODUCTION General biology of Trachurus murphyi. Oceanographic characteristics of coastal waters off Northern Chile. The Chilean fishery of jack mackerel. Size composition in the jack mackerel fishery. Length-weight relation and seasonal variation of weight. Recruitment. Catches of jack mackerel and oceanographic condition. A summary of the period. Geographical distribution of catches and distribution of T°, oo 1975 1978. and 02 in October and March Monthly catches by area and sea water temperature. CPUE and temperature of sea water. Another essay of relationships between CPUE and environment. 4. REFERENCES APPENDIX List of tables. Tables. List of figures. Figures. INTRODUCTION Jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) is part of a multispecies pelagic fishery in northern Chile, which together with anchovy (Engraulis ringens) and sardine (Sardinops sagax), account for more of 75% of the weight and 90% of the value of the entire Chilean fishery. Catches of anchovy, which are used mainly for fish meal production, have decreased appreciably since 1970, while catches of the jack mackerel have increased. In 1978 jack macke rel comprised 33% by weight of the fish catch of Chile. This report reviews previous studies and presents original data on the biology, habitat, fisheries biology and fisheries oceanography of the jack mackerel fishery of Chile, and has been written as a contribution for a fu ture management of this fishery. General biology of Trachurus murphyi Trachurus is one three closely related genera (with Decapterus and Selar) of the carangid subfamily Carangidae.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Wasted Resources: Bycatch and Discards in U. S. Fisheries
    Wasted Resources: Bycatch and discards in U. S. Fisheries by J. M. Harrington, MRAG Americas, Inc. R. A. Myers, Dalhousie University A. A. Rosenberg, University of New Hampshire Prepared by MRAG Americas, Inc. For Oceana July 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 NATIONAL OVERVIEW 9 Introduction 9 Methodology 11 Discarded Bycatch Estimates for the 27 Major Fisheries in the U.S. 12 Recommendations 17 Definitions of Key Terms Used in the Report 19 Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in the Report 20 NORTHEAST 25 Northeast Groundfish Fishery 27 Target landings 28 Regulations 30 Discards 32 Squid, Mackerel and Butterfish Fishery 41 Target landings 42 Regulations 44 Discards 44 Monkfish Fishery 53 Target landings 53 Regulations 54 Discards 55 Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery 59 Target landings 59 Regulations 60 Discards 61 Spiny Dogfish Fishery 69 Target landings 69 Regulations 70 Discards 70 Atlantic Surf Clam and Ocean Quahog Fishery 75 Target landings 75 Regulations 76 Discards 76 Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery 79 Target landings 79 Regulations 80 Discards 81 Atlantic Sea Herring Fishery 85 Target landings 85 Regulations 86 Discards 87 Northern Golden Tilefish Fishery 93 Target landings 93 Regulations 94 Discards 94 Atlantic Bluefish Fishery 97 Target landings 97 Regulations 98 Discards 98 Deep Sea Red Crab Fishery 101 Target landings 101 Regulations 101 Discards 102 SOUTHEAST 103 Shrimp Fishery of the South Atlantic 105 Target landings 105 Regulations 106 Discards 107 Snapper and Grouper of the South Atlantic 111 Target
    [Show full text]