DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

542 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Pacific, Eastern Central C-77 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Pacifique, centre-est (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Pacífico, centro-oriental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Milkfish Chanos chanos 25 9 052 6 861 10 521 10 669 6 312 11 843 7 069 God's flounder Cyclopsetta panamensis 31 ... ... 117 2 20 20 113 California flounder Paralichthys californicus 31 171 170 178 185 210 255 253 Flatfishes nei Pleuronectiformes 31 3 190 4 340 5 401 5 775 5 583 6 346 6 251 North Pacific hake Merluccius productus 32 2 592 8 302 10 077 7 431 11 581 8 248 12 971 Gadiformes nei Gadiformes 32 71 1 1 855 180 949 202 Hawaiian ladyfish Elops hawaiensis 33 0 0 0 - 0 1 - Sea catfishes nei Ariidae 33 3 069 3 721 4 704 5 401 6 471 5 958 7 065 Squirrelfishes nei Holocentridae 33 23 26 25 4 24 26 19 Flathead grey mullet Mugil cephalus 33 516 3 877 5 055 6 266 7 989 6 957 8 947 White mullet Mugil curema 33 176 1 432 1 647 1 798 2 175 1 996 2 436 Bobo mullet Joturus pichardi 33 53 30 28 47 69 52 77 Mullets nei Mugilidae 33 2 972 464 389 557 746 617 834 Snooks(=Robalos) nei Centropomus spp 33 1 655 2 316 3 426 3 310 4 323 3 926 4 840 Groupers nei Epinephelus spp 33 48 45 42 42 42 42 41 ...A Paralabrax spp 33 5 878 5 317 5 520 5 308 5 682 5 892 6 364 Groupers, seabasses nei Serranidae 33 544 1 479 2 102 2 780 3 354 3 125 3 807 Giant seabass Stereolepis gigas 33 1 1 1 3 2 4 2 Bigeyes nei Priacanthus spp 33 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 Yellow snapper Lutjanus argentiventris 33 87 327 522 470 749 522 839 Spotted rose snapper Lutjanus guttatus 33 321 1 119 1 796 2 048 1 482 1 967 1 702 Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru 33 2 862 4 652 8 153 11 380 13 365 12 632 14 969 Snappers nei Lutjanus spp 33 1 368 1 071 1 835 1 828 1 525 1 689 1 584 Green jobfish Aprion virescens 33 42 47 37 23 52 56 32 Mexican barred snapper Hoplopagrus guentherii 33 100 312 570 525 575 583 644 Snappers, jobfishes nei Lutjanidae 33 5 384 6 234 6 176 7 334 9 112 8 336 9 773 Grunts, sweetlips nei Haemulidae (=Pomadasyidae) 33 1 657 2 725 4 052 4 258 4 247 4 815 5 003 Weakfishes nei Cynoscion spp 33 6 234 6 619 12 111 13 210 14 054 14 589 15 644 Croakers nei Micropogonias spp 33 2 020 169 108 108 89 120 100 White weakfish Atractoscion nobilis 33 180 118 123 88 106 105 109 Croakers, drums nei Sciaenidae 33 1 815 2 139 444 411 420 420 288 Emperors(=Scavengers) nei Lethrinidae 33 3 3 5 6 4 7 4 Goatfishes, red mullets nei Mullidae 33 21 24 24 1 24 17 15 Mojarras, etc. nei Gerreidae 33 546 840 877 991 952 1 100 1 066 Sea chubs nei Kyphosidae 33 13 13 7 0 6 6 5 California sheephead Semicossyphus pulcher 33 28 28 41 34 28 23 21 Parrotfishes nei Scaridae 33 50 54 54 21 34 41 67 Surgeonfishes nei Acanthuridae 33 68 66 63 14 54 48 40 Triggerfishes, durgons nei Balistidae 33 122 2 026 3 570 4 900 8 494 5 439 9 513 Red pike conger Cynoponticus coniceps 34 36 26 28 41 52 ... 58 Ocean whitefish Caulolatilus princeps 34 1 784 1 688 2 222 2 569 2 717 2 852 3 043 Escolar Lepidocybium flavobrunneum 34 49 96 33 4 7 7 8 Oilfish Ruvettus pretiosus 34 284 262 241 219 201 145 138 Roudi escolar Promethichthys prometheus 34 8 ... 12 4 7 7 7 Chilipepper rockfish Sebastes goodei 34 236 321 273 175 80 178 366 Gopher rockfish Sebastes carnatus 34 23 23 26 29 22 27 29 Cowcod Sebastes levis 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... Bank rockfish Sebastes rufus 34 11 51 43 47 37 32 28 Scorpionfishes, redfishes nei Scorpaenidae 34 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 California pilchard Sardinops caeruleus 35 364 375 255 950 197 412 58 794 108 099 61 364 120 707 Red-eye round herring Etrumeus teres 35 7 933 31 772 16 384 48 145 57 210 53 443 64 075 Pacific thread herring Opisthonema libertate 35 198 604 298 660 319 727 277 757 283 737 305 472 324 813 Californian anchovy Engraulis mordax 35 79 230 143 477 55 016 51 831 22 382 43 435 32 813 Pacific anchoveta Cetengraulis mysticetus 35 342 987 262 851 118 143 110 589 44 966 119 523 57 817 Clupeoids nei Clupeoidei 35 1 753 744 807 972 205 135 44 Striped bonito Sarda orientalis 36 4 - 32 7 10 10 1 Eastern Pacific bonito Sarda chiliensis 36 4 259 1 241 1 090 746 531 1 559 1 147 Wahoo Acanthocybium solandri 36 699 788 1 135 905 981 897 570 Pacific sierra Scomberomorus sierra 36 8 147 10 504 12 313 12 297 13 270 13 663 14 751 Frigate and bullet tunas Auxis thazard, A. rochei 36 - - 75 ... ... ... 0 Black skipjack Euthynnus lineatus 36 3 622 2 497 3 075 2 387 3 946 2 729 4 139 Kawakawa Euthynnus affinis 36 2 2 6 5 3 3 2 Skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis 36 92 319 69 252 209 711 227 586 221 676 223 080 205 636 Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis 36 6 649 3 156 4 871 3 088 2 819 3 423 3 155 Albacore Thunnus alalunga 36 28 856 32 422 28 680 26 426 24 692 23 601 23 013 Yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares 36 163 087 181 767 207 794 193 639 181 928 198 508 185 424 Bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus 36 66 958 64 433 66 349 74 456 79 004 77 870 72 692 Indo-Pacific sailfish Istiophorus platypterus 36 1 379 846 748 580 582 406 376 Blue marlin Makaira nigricans 36 4 502 5 193 5 160 6 456 6 105 5 268 4 782 Black marlin Makaira indica 36 504 97 153 122 164 208 206 Striped marlin Tetrapturus audax 36 2 056 2 084 1 744 1 650 1 687 1 806 2 091 Shortbill spearfish Tetrapturus angustirostris 36 428 903 508 482 396 390 388 Marlins,sailfishes,etc. nei Istiophoridae 36 1 185 1 021 1 529 1 367 1 352 1 279 1 116 Swordfish Xiphias gladius 36 8 672 9 896 10 932 10 773 9 630 10 877 11 535 Tuna-like fishes nei Scombroidei 36 128 014 127 868 1 393 1 422 1 749 1 526 1 523 Pacific saury Cololabis saira 37 13 961 20 055 23 431 11 204 16 962 ... ... Halfbeaks nei Hemiramphidae 37 3 12 4 4 1 1 1 Flyingfishes nei Exocoetidae 37 42 80 25 25 31 28 28 Opah Lampris guttatus 37 839 1 083 1 025 1 091 138 960 1 193 Pacific jack mackerel Trachurus symmetricus 37 192 1 363 333 134 511 149 572 Scads nei Decapterus spp 37 80 79 72 634 1 049 1 026 1 024 Green jack Caranx caballus 37 ... 469 29 52 52 ... 80 Jacks, crevalles nei Caranx spp 37 5 368 6 870 10 246 10 170 9 589 11 300 10 737 Pompanos nei Trachinotus spp 37 470 4 885 1 632 2 074 2 234 2 302 2 502 543 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Pacific, Eastern Central C-77 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Pacifique, centre-est (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Pacífico, centro-oriental English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Yellowtail amberjack Seriola lalandi 37 9 10 19 50 25 33 19 Longfin yellowtail Seriola rivoliana 37 1 - - - - - ... Amberjacks nei Seriola spp 37 30 89 116 72 63 82 70 Shortjaw leatherjacket Oligoplites refulgens 37 662 6 129 12 502 7 556 2 823 8 387 3 162 Rainbow runner Elagatis bipinnulata 37 2 2 3 1 3 3 2 Bigeye scad Selar crumenophthalmus 37 216 589 668 454 1 072 608 1 167 Carangids nei Carangidae 37 254 2 405 4 432 961 730 611 671 Sickle pomfret Taractichthys steindachneri 37 27 38 27 37 27 27 27 Pomfrets, ocean breams nei Bramidae 37 332 518 564 607 529 445 422 Common dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus 37 4 894 5 509 6 311 4 769 2 200 3 368 4 044 Pacific chub mackerel Scomber japonicus 37 20 997 40 383 49 873 57 240 83 117 59 529 93 596 Barracudas nei Sphyraena spp 37 918 351 168 162 109 177 101 Ocean sunfish Mola mola 37 0 0 0 - 706 - ... Bigeye thresher Alopias superciliosus 38 - 1 1 1 1 2 ... Thresher sharks nei Alopias spp 38 19 6 7 5 2 3 1 Shortfin mako Isurus oxyrinchus 38 879 528 484 278 74 31 524 Mako sharks Isurus spp 38 20 17 10 24 29 21 40 Blue shark Prionace glauca 38 4 992 5 272 5 844 5 572 5 056 5 301 7 443 Oceanic whitetip shark Carcharhinus longimanus 38 6 13 ..
Recommended publications
  • LUT Lut 33 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY

    LUT Lut 33 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY

    click for previous page LUT Lut 33 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY: LUTJANIDAE FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) Lutjanus duodecemlineatus (Valenciennes, 1839) OTHER SCIENTIFIC NAMES STILL IN USE: Lutjanus notatus (Cuvier, 1828) VERNACULAR NAMES: FAO : En - Bluestriped snapper Fr - Vivaneau à raies bleues Sp - Pargo docenario NATIONAL: DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS: A small, robust snapper with a prominent notch on rear edge of preopercle. Vomerine teeth in a narrow Λ - shaped patch, without a median posterior projection; gillrakers on first gill arch 6 or 7 + 1 + 11 or 12 (including rudiments). Dorsal fin with 11 or 12 spines and 12 or 13 soft rays; anal fin with 3 spines and 8 soft rays; caudal fin emarginate. Lateral line scales 48 or 49; longitudinal scale rows ascending obliquely above lateral line and running horizontally below it; predorsal scales beginning at midinterorbital space; preopercle with 10 to 12 scale rows, including those on lower border. Colour: generally yellow with 6 or 7 blue stripes on sides, the uppermost 3 or 4 running obliquely from back of eye to dorsal fin base; a large blackish spot sometimes present below soft dorsal fin, positioned mainly above lateral line; fins yellowish. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERS OF SIMILAR SPECIES OCCURRING THE AREA: Lutjanus coeruleolineatus (only Red and Arabian Seas): colour pattern similar, but with blue spots or broken lines on snout and cheek; 10 dorsal spines (11 or 12 in L. duodecemlineatus); predorsal scales beginning well behind eyes (begin at midinterorbital in L. duodecem- lineatus). _L. bengalensis: 4 blue stripes on side (6 or 7 in _L. duodecemlineatus); no blue spots or broken lines on snout and cheek; no blackish spot on upper side below soft dorsal fin.
  • Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)

    Reef Snappers (Lutjanidae)

    #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Two-spot red snapper (Lutjanus bohar) Mangrove red snapper Blacktail snapper (Lutjanus argentimaculatus) (Lutjanus fulvus) Common bluestripe snapper (Lutjanus kasmira) Humpback red snapper Emperor red snapper (Lutjanus gibbus) (Lutjanus sebae) Species & Distribution Habitats & Feeding The family Lutjanidae contains more than 100 species of Although most snappers live near coral reefs, some species tropical and sub-tropical fi sh known as snappers. are found in areas of less salty water in the mouths of rivers. Most species of interest in the inshore fi sheries of Pacifi c Islands belong to the genus Lutjanus, which contains about The young of some species school on seagrass beds and 60 species. sandy areas, while larger fi sh may be more solitary and live on coral reefs. Many species gather in large feeding schools One of the most widely distributed of the snappers in the around coral formations during daylight hours. Pacifi c Ocean is the common bluestripe snapper, Lutjanus kasmira, which reaches lengths of about 30 cm. The species Snappers feed on smaller fi sh, crabs, shrimps, and sea snails. is found in many Pacifi c Islands and was introduced into They are eaten by a number of larger fi sh. In some locations, Hawaii in the 1950s. species such as the two-spot red snapper, Lutjanus bohar, are responsible for ciguatera fi sh poisoning (see the glossary in the Guide to Information Sheets). #05 Reef snappers (Lutjanidae) Reproduction & Life cycle Snappers have separate sexes. Smaller species have a maximum lifespan of about 4 years and larger species live for more than 15 years.
  • Cytogenetic Analysis of Global Populations of Mugil Cephalus (Striped Mullet) by Different Staining Techniques and Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization

    Cytogenetic Analysis of Global Populations of Mugil Cephalus (Striped Mullet) by Different Staining Techniques and Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization

    Heredity 76 (1996) 77—82 Received 30 May 1995 Cytogenetic analysis of global populations of Mugil cephalus (striped mullet) by different staining techniques and fluorescent in situ hybridization ANNA RITA ROSSI, DONATELLA CROSETTIt, EKATERINA GORNUNG & LUCIANA SOLA* Department of Animal and Human Biology, University of Rome 7, Via A. Bore/li 50, 00161 Rome and tICRAM, Central Institute for Marine Research, Via L. Respighi 5, 00197 Rome, Italy Thepresent paper reports the results of cytogenetic analysis carried out on several scattered populations of the striped mullet, Mugil cephalus, the most widespead among mugilid species. The karyotype was investigated through Ag-staining, C-banding, fluorochrome-staining (chro- momycin A3/DAPI) and fluorescent in situ hybridization with rDNA genes. All populations showed the same chromosome number and morphology and no changes were detected in heterochromatin and NORs. Therefore, neither population- nor sex-specific marker chromo- somes were identified. In some of the specimens, NOR size heteromorphism was detected. Results are discussed with respect to karyotype and ribosomal cistrons organization and to cytotaxonomic implications. Keywords:cytotaxonomy,FISH, heterochromatin, karyotype, NOR. Although the karyotype of M cephalus is already Introduction known (Table 1), there are no data from differential Thestriped mullet, Mugil cephalus, is the most wide- staining techniques, except for observations on spread among mugilid species, and inhabits the trop- nucleolar organizer regions (NOR5) by Amemiya & ical and subtropical seas of the world. Both the Gold (1986). Moreover, previous studies cover only worldwide distribution, the range discontinuity few localities from the wide species range and speci- (Thomson, 1963) and the coastally-dependent life mens from more than one collecting site have never history have raised questions on the conspecificity of been observed in the same laboratory.
  • Redalyc.Population Structure of the Pacific Angel Shark (Squatina Californica) Along the Northwestern Coast of Mexico Based on T

    Redalyc.Population Structure of the Pacific Angel Shark (Squatina Californica) Along the Northwestern Coast of Mexico Based on T

    Ciencias Marinas ISSN: 0185-3880 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Baja California México Ramírez-Amaro, Sergio; Ramírez-Macías, Dení; Vázquez-Juárez, Ricardo; Flores- Ramírez, Sergio; Galván-Magaña, Felipe; Gutiérrez-Rivera, Jesús N. Population structure of the Pacific angel shark (Squatina californica) along the northwestern coast of Mexico based on the mitochondrial DNA control region Ciencias Marinas, vol. 43, núm. 1, 2017, pp. 69-80 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48050568004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Ciencias Marinas (2017), 43(1): 69–80 http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v43i1.2692 Population structure of the Pacific angel shark (Squatina californica) along the northwestern coast of Mexico based on the mitochondrial DNA control region Estructura poblacional del tiburón ángel del Pacífico (Squatina californica) a lo largo de la costa noroccidental de México con base en la regíon control del ADN mitocondrial Sergio Ramírez-Amaro1, Dení Ramírez-Macías2, Ricardo Vázquez-Juárez3*, Sergio Flores-Ramírez4, Felipe Galván-Magaña5, Jesús N Gutiérrez-Rivera3 1 Universitat de les Illes Balears, Laboratori de Genètica, Carretera de Valldemossa km 7.5, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. 2 Tiburón Ballena México de ConCIENCIA México, Manatí 4, no. 802, colonia Esperanza III, CP 23090, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. 3 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Mar Bermejo 195, colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, CP 23096, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.
  • Monthly Highlights

    Monthly Highlights

    Monthly Highlights No. 2 / 2021 In this issue As of 2021, the Monthly Highlights include Bulgaria among surveyed countries. According to data collected by EUMOFA from 13 EU Member States, in November 2020 striped venus and whelk together accounted for 12% of the total Contents first-sales value of the “Bivalves and other molluscs and aquatic invertebrates” commodity group. First sales in Europe Striped venus (Italy, Spain) and whelk From 2018 to 2020, the price of live, fresh, or chilled (Belgium, France, Netherlands) mussels imported in the EU from Norway fluctuated from 2,04 to 7,09 EUR/kg. In 2020, both price and Extra-EU imports volume exhibited a downward trend. Weekly average EU import prices of selected products from Over the last four years, German consumers spent selected countries of origin the most for a kilogram of fresh cod, (18,00 EUR/kg on average) compared to France Consumption Fresh cod in Germany, France, and the (16,80 EUR/kg) and the Netherlands (16,30 EUR/kg). Netherlands In 2019, the EU imports of fisheries and aquaculture products from South Africa accounted for over EUR Case studies 295 million and 80.597 tonnes. Hake, squid, and Fisheries and aquaculture in South Africa fishmeal constitute the bulk share of EU imports. Horse mackerel in the EU The largest market for horse mackerel exported by the EU is Egypt. In 2019, exports to the country Global highlights reached 54.000 tonnes, worth EUR 51 million, accounting for 50% of total export volume Macroeconomic context and 47% of value. Marine fuel, consumer prices, and In January 2021, the EU and Greenland concluded exchange rates negotiations for a new four-year Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement (SFPA), which is the third most important agreement in place for the EU in financial terms.
  • Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients

    Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients

    IFFO RS Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Fishery Assessment Methodology and Template Report V2.0 Version No.: 2.0 Date: July 2017 Page 1 IFFO RS Global Standard for Responsible Supply of Marine Ingredients Chilean jack mackerel, Jurel (Trachurus murphyi) Fishery Under Assessment Chile EEZ XV-X Date December 2019 Assessor Jim Daly Application details and summary of the assessment outcome Name: Blumar and others Address: Country: Chile Zip: Tel. No.: Fax. No.: Email address: Applicant Code Key Contact: Title: Certification Body Details Name of Certification Body: SAI Global Ltd Assessment Initial/Surveillance/ Whole fish/ Assessor Name Peer Reviewer Days Re-approval By-product Jim Daly Conor Donnelly 3 SURV 1 Whole fish Assessment Period 2019 Scope Details SUBPESCA & SERNAPESCA, Chile EEZ; Management Authority (Country/State) SPRFMO International Waters Main Species Chilean jack mackerel Trachurus murphyi Fishery Location Chile EEZ VX-X Gear Type(s) Purse seine, hand-line Outcome of Assessment Chilean Jack mackerel Jurel Trachurus PASS murphyi Clauses Failed NONE Pacific Chub mackerel Caballa Scomber PASS japonicus Clauses Failed NONE Blue fathead Pez medusa Cubiceps caeruleus PASS Clauses Failed NONE PASS Snoek Sierra Thyrsites atun Clauses Failed NONE Version No.: 2.0 Date: July 2017 Page 2 Peer Review Evaluation APPROVE Recommendation PASS Assessment Determination The Northern fishery (XV-II) is mostly within the Chilean EEZ; the Central-Southern fishery (III-X) is within the Chilean EEZ and also straddles international waters. The Central-Southern fishery is used mainly for the reduction fishery for Chilean Jack mackerel.
  • FISHES of the FAMILY LUTJANIDAE of Taiwanl

    FISHES of the FAMILY LUTJANIDAE of Taiwanl

    Bull. Inst. Zool., Academia Sinica 26(4): 279-303 (1987) FISHES OF THE FAMILY LUTJANIDAE OF TAIWANl SIN-CHE LEE. Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 11529 Republic of China (Received July 3, 1987) (Revision received July 11, 1987) (Accepted July 31, 1987) Sin-Che Lee (1987) Fishes of the family Lutjanidae of Taiwan. Bull. Inst. Zoology, Academia Sinica 26 (4): 279-303. Up to date, a total of 44 lutjanid species are confirmed to occur around the waters of Taiwan. They include 4 subfamilies and .10 genera: Paradicichthyinae (Symphorus, 1 species); Lutjaninae (Lutjanus, 23 species; Macolor, 1 species; Pinjalo, 2 species): Apsilinae (Paracaesio, 3 species); Etelinae (Aprion, 1 species; Aphareus, 2 species; Etelis, 3 species; Pristipomoides, 6 species; Tropidinius, 2 species). Among 44 species, Lutjanus ehrenbergii and Pristipomoides typus are not yet available and are 'provisionally excluded from this report. The remaining 42 species are provided with their distinctive characters with color photos as well as the keys for specific identification. The following 12 species namely Aphareus furcatus, A. rutilans, Etelis carbunculus E. radiosus, Lutjanus bengalensis, L. carponotatus, L. doedecanthoides, Pristipomoides auricilla, P. multidens, Tropidinius amoenus, T. zona/us, are first records from Taiwan, and Pinjalo microphthalmus is the new species. and Richardson added 5 species namely Fishes of Lutjanidae or snappers have Lutjanus fuscescens (=L. russelli) , L. quinque­ the dorsal fin continuou·s or with a shallow lineatus (L. spilurus is the synonym of it), L. notch, with 10-12 spines and 10-17 soft rays; kasmira,. L. lineolatus (=L. lutjanus) , and L. anal fin wi th 3 s pi nes and 7-11 soft rays; rivulatus.
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D

    Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D

    The Open Marine Biology Journal, 2008, 2, 29-37 29 Molecular Phylogeny of Mugilidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) D. Aurelle1, R.-M. Barthelemy*,2, J.-P. Quignard3, M. Trabelsi4 and E. Faure2 1UMR 6540 DIMAR, Station Marine d'Endoume, Rue de la Batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France 2LATP, UMR 6632, Evolution Biologique et Modélisation, case 18, Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille Cedex 3, France 3Laboratoire d’Ichtyologie, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France 4Unité de Biologie marine, Faculté des Sciences, Campus Universitaire, 2092 Manar II, Tunis, Tunisie Abstract: Molecular phylogenetic relationships among five genera and twelve Mugilidae species were investigated us- ing published mitochondrial cytochrome b and 16S rDNA sequences. These analyses suggested the paraphyly of the genus Liza and also that the separation of Liza, Chelon and Oedalechilus might be unnatural. Moreover, all the species of the genus Mugil plus orthologs of Crenimugil crenilabis clustered together; however, molecular analyses suggested possible introgressions in Mugil cephalus and moreover, that fish identified as Mugil curema could correspond to two different species as already shown by karyotypic analyses. Keywords: Mugilidae, grey mullets, mitochondrial DNA, Mugil cephalus, introgression. INTRODUCTION We have focused this study on Mugilid species for which both cytochrome b (cytb) and 16S rDNA mtDNA sequences The family Mugilidae, commonly referred to as grey have been already published. Their geographic distributions mullets, includes several species which have a worldwide are briefly presented here. Oedalechilus labeo is limited to distribution; they inhabit marine, estuarine, and freshwater the Mediterranean Sea and the Moroccan Atlantic coast, environments at all latitudes except the Polar Regions [1]; a whereas, Liza and Chelon inhabit also the Eastern Atlantic few spend all their lives in freshwater [2].
  • A Global Valuation of Tuna an Update February 2020 (Final)

    A Global Valuation of Tuna an Update February 2020 (Final)

    Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna an update February 2020 (Final) ii Report Information This report has been prepared with the financial support of The Pew Charitable Trusts. The views expressed in this study are purely those of the authors. The content of this report may not be reproduced, or even part thereof, without explicit reference to the source. Citation: Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., Defaux, V., Llewellin, P., and James, P., 2019. Netting Billions: a global valuation of tuna (an update). Report produced by Poseidon Aquatic Resources Management Ltd. Client: The Pew Charitable Trusts Version: Final Report ref: 1456-REG/R/02/A Date issued: 7 February 2020 Acknowledgements: Our thanks to the following consultants who assisted with data collection for this study: Richard Banks, Sachiko Tsuji, Charles Greenwald, Heiko Seilert, Gilles Hosch, Alicia Sanmamed, Anna Madriles, Gwendal le Fol, Tomasz Kulikowski, and Benoit Caillart. 7 February 2020 iii CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2. STUDY METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 3 3. TUNA LANDINGS ..................................................................................................... 5 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES ....................................................................................... 5 3.2 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................
  • Redalyc.Peces De La Fauna De Acompañamiento En La Pesca

    Redalyc.Peces De La Fauna De Acompañamiento En La Pesca

    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica López-Martínez, Juana; Herrera-Valdivia, Eloisa; Rodríguez-Romero, Jesús; Hernández-Vázquez, Sergio Peces de la fauna de acompañamiento en la pesca industrial de camarón en el Golfo de California, México Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 58, núm. 3, septiembre, 2010, pp. 925-942 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44918839010 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Peces de la fauna de acompañamiento en la pesca industrial de camarón en el Golfo de California, México Juana López-Martínez1, Eloisa Herrera-Valdivia1, Jesús Rodríguez-Romero2 & Sergio Hernández-Vázquez2 1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Km 2.35 Carretera a Las Tinajas, S/N Colonia Tinajas, Guaymas, Sonora, México C. P. 85460; [email protected], [email protected] 2. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Apdo. postal 128 La Paz, B.C.S. C.P. 23000; [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 19-VII-2009. Corregido 15-III-2010. Aceptado 16-IV-2010. Abstract: Bycatch fish species from shrimp industrial fishery in the Gulf of California, Mexico. The shrimp fishery in the Gulf of California is one the most important activities of revenue and employment for communi- ties.
  • Proposal for Inclusion of the Angelshark

    Proposal for Inclusion of the Angelshark

    CMS Distribution: General CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.23 MIGRATORY 6 June 2017 SPECIES Original: English 12th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Manila, Philippines, 23 - 28 October 2017 Agenda Item 25.1. PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE ANGELSHARK (Squatina squatina) ON APPENDIX I AND II OF THE CONVENTION Summary: The Government of Monaco has submitted the attached proposal* for the inclusion of the Angelshark (Squatina squatina) on Appendix I and II of CMS. *The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.1.23 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE ANGELSHARK (Squatina squatina) ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Inclusion of the species Squatina squatina, Angelshark, in Appendix I and II. B. PROPONENT: Government of the Principality of Monaco C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Chondrichthyes, subclass Elasmobranchii 1.2 Order: Squatiniformes 1.3 Family: S quatinidae 1.4 Genus, species: Squatina squatina Linnaeus, 1758 1.5 Scientific synonyms 1.6 Common Name: English: Angelshark, common or European Angelshark, angel ray, shark ray, monkfish French: Ange de mer commun, L'angelot, Spanish: Angelote, Peje angel, tiburón angel German: Meerengel, Engelhai, Gemeiner Meerengel Italian: Angelu, Pesce angelo, Squatru cefalu, Terrezzino Portuguese: Anjo, Peixe anjo, Viola 2.
  • I CHARACTERIZATION of the STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) in SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE of FISHERS and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

    I CHARACTERIZATION of the STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) in SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE of FISHERS and ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

    i CHARACTERIZATION OF THE STRIPED MULLET (MUGIL CEPHALUS) IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: INFLUENCE OF FISHERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ________________________________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ________________________________________________________________________ By Charlotte Marin 2018 ii APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science ________________________________________ Charlotte A. Marin Approved: 2018 ________________________________________ S. Gregory Tolley, Ph.D. Committee Chair ________________________________________ Richard Cody, Ph.D. ________________________________________ Edwin M. Everham III, Ph.D. The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to dedicate this project to Harvey and Kathryn Klinger, my loving grandparents, to whom I can attribute my love of fishing and passion for the environment. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my mom, Kathy, for providing a solid educational foundation that has prepared me to reach this milestone and inspired me to continuously learn. I would also like to thank my aunt, Deb, for always supporting my career aspirations and encouraging me to follow my dreams. I would like to thank my in-laws, Carlos and Dora, for their enthusiasm and generosity in babysitting hours and for always wishing the best for me. To my son, Leo, the light of my life, who inspires me every day to keep learning and growing, to set the best example for him.