DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexander Addison: the Disillusionment of a "Republican Schoolmaster" G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ALEXANDER ADDISON: THE DISILLUSIONMENT OF A "REPUBLICAN SCHOOLMASTER" G. S. Rowe the new American republic faced a herculean task in in- Thatculcating its citizenry with republican values and practices has been duly noted by American historians. Unfortunately, the degree to which the court system in general and the judiciary in particular shouldered the burden for this education has been largely ignored. 1 Pennsylvania's legal apparatus was employed in a variety of ways to promulgate the virtue and responsibility deemed crucial for the salva- tion of the new Republic. 2 No state judge strove more conscientiously or systematically to educate the public to the behavior and ideals called for by America's republican experiment than Alexander Addi- son. During his tenure as president of Pennsylvania's Fifth Judicial District between 1791 and 1803, he became for many Western Penn- sylvanians the "schoolmaster" of American republicanism. Addison has not fared well at the hands of historians. He has been characterized routinely as "arrogant," "humorless," "overbear- ing," "uncompromising," and "vindictive." His tenure as presiding G. S. Rowe is professor of history at the University of Northern Colorado in Greeley. Recipient of a Ph.D. from Stanford, Professor Rowe has recently published a book, Thomas McKean :The Shaping of an American Republicanism, and has had articles appear in The American Journal of Legal History, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Delaware History, and Pennsylvania History. He is currently at workon a study of Pennsylvania's legal bar and judiciary during the Revolutionary years. Professor Rowe wishes to thank Professors Charles Meyer and Stephen T.Powers for their assistance in the preparation of this article.—Editor 1 Gordon S. Wood, The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787 (Chapel Hill, 1965), 426; Lawrence A. Cremin, American Education: The Colonial Experience, 1607-1783 (New York, 1970), 564-70. For a sensitive treatment of the court's educational functions in Virginia, see Rhys Isaac, "Dramatizing the Ideology of Revolution: Popular Mobilization in Virginia, 1774 to 1776," William and Mary Quarterly 33 (July 1976), 357-85. 2 See, for instance, George Bryan to the Sheriff of Philadelphia, Mar. 17, 1779; John Dickinson to the Judges of the Supreme Court, Oct. 8, 1785, in Pennsylvania Archives, 1st ser., 7: 252; 10: 523 (hereafter cited as Pa. Archives) ; Thomas McKean to Mrs. McKean, Oct. 29, 1779, McKean Papers, Historical Society of Pennsylvania (hereafter cited as HSP). Dickin- son told the judges "that besides the Terror of legal Penalties, all the Influence to be derived from your Characters, and the Dignity of your Stations, might be applied in disseminating the best Principles & setting foreward the most effectual Regulations for the prevention of offenses." 222 G. S. ROWE JULY judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit has been described in equally un- flattering terms :the consensus holds that he "permitted his violent partisanship to color his behavior on the bench, and ...condemned not only criminal offenders, but political opponents." 3 The fact that Addison was subsequently impeached, convicted, and removed from office by the state legislature in January 1803, has elicited as little adverse comment from historians as it did from contemporaries. 4 Thus, Addison stands starkly one-dimensional in accounts of early Pennsylvania, frozen in time as belligerent, congenitally conservative and Federalist, paranoid in the face of the democratic thrust increas- ingly apparent in state and national affairs, irrationally striking out at opponents, and perverting his office and court to his own selfish, myopic political ends. Ifmodern historians have conceded his role as a spokesman and propagandist of some power and influence, they 3 Russell J. Ferguson, Early Western Pennsylvania Politics (Pittsburgh, 1938), 115; Albert Beveridge, The Life of John Marshall, 4 vols. (Boston, 1916-1919), 3 :164; Raymond Walters, Jr., Albert Gallatin: Jeffersonian Finan- cier and Diplomat (Pittsburgh, 1957), 31;Leland D.Baldwin, Pittsburgh: The Story of a City (Pittsburgh, 1937), 176; Aurora, Jan. 19, 1803. James Schouler (History of the United States Under the Constitution, 7 vols. [New York, 1894-1913], 3: 61) remarks on Addison's "scandalous rudeness." Sanford W. Higginbotham (The Keystone in the Democratic Arch: Pennsylvania Politics, 1800-1816 [Harrisburg, 1952], 53) labels him "a violent Federalist," Dumas Malone (Jefferson the President: First Term, 1801-1805 [Boston, 1970], 459) comments on Addison's "intransigence," Richard E. Ellis (The Jeffersonian Crisis: Courts and Politics in the Young Republic [New York, 1971], 164) calls him "an uncompromising Federalist," and Robert M. John- stone (Jefferson and the Presidency [Ithaca, N.Y., 1978], 180) notes his "im- proprieties" and his "partisan decisions and political harangues from the bench." Allconcede his ability. For more favorable assessments of his conduct on the bench, see Neville B. Craig, The History of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, 1851), 286-87; WilliamH. Lloyd, The Early Courts of Pennsylvania (Boston, 1910), 141;Daniel Agnew, "Address to the Allegheny County Bar Association, December 1, 1888," Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 13 (1889) :3 (hereafter cited as PMHB) ; J. W. F. White, "The Judiciary in Allegheny County," ibid. 7 (1883): 155-58; and A. B. Reid, "Early Courts, Judges, and Lawyers of Allegheny County," Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine 5 (July 1922) :189, 194 (hereafter cited as WPHM). 4 A large dinner was given for Addison in Fayette County following his removal, and Neville B. Craig (History of Pittsburgh, 286), writes that "Pitts- burgh and the country around it were greatly excited by the impeachment of ... Addison." The Federalist press supported Addisen during the impeachment proceedings, as did Federalists in the legislature, but as Dumas Malone has correctly observed, "Federalists made littleof the case afterwards." He sug- gests that their reticence was prompted by the weakness of Addison's case. See Malone, Jefferson the President: First Term, 459. For a contemporary statement that Federalists were as embarrassed by Addison's antics as were Republicans and sought to support him only in a perfunctory manner, see Thomas McKean to Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 7, 1803, Jefferson Papers, Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, Washington, D.C. (hereafter cited as LCMD). An examination of Federalist newspapers in the state for the years 1803 and 1804 confirms McKean's assessment. 1979 ALEXANDER ADDISON 223 have almost universally condemned his doctrines and practices as xenophobic, reactionary, and, in the end, destructive to the very Republic he sought to save. 5 Yet a careful examination of Addison's public speeches, his writ- ings, and his judicial pronouncements during his twelve-year judicial tenure reveals a man strangely at variance with the historical charac- terization. These materials not only provide the basis for a more judicious portrait of Addison, but they also clarify the nature of his special role as a teacher in Western Pennsylvania in the decade before Jefferson's first inauguration. Moreover, they identify important shifts in Addison' s perceptions and assessments of the nature and di- rection of Pennsylvania's republican experiment. Ifthe historical cari- cature has any validity, these sources suggest that it has merit only in terms of the last years of Addison's public career. This article, therefore, is concerned with Addison's role as "schoolmaster" of American republicanism to Western Pennsylvania, and with his philosophical and ideological shifts.6 Born in 1759, the son of James Addison of Keith, Scotland, and educated at Marischal College, Aberdeen University, Addison emi- grated to Washington County, Pennsylvania, in 1785. In December of that year, he appealed to the presbytery at Redstone (Brownsville) for a license to preach. Despite his having been previously licensed by the presbytery of Aberlaur, Scotland, and his having assisted the Reverend James Ogilvie at Rothes for four years prior tohis coming to America, the Redstone presbytery delayed in granting the license. 5 For comments on his rare oratorical skills and general persuasiveness, see Alexander Graydon, Memoirs of his own Time with reminiscences of the men and events of the Revolution, edited by J. S. Littell (Philadelphia, 1846), 352 ;Beveridge, Life of John Marshall, 3 :164 ;Henry Marie Brackenridge, Recollections of Persons and Places in the West (Philadelphia, 1868), 100; White, "The Judiciary in Allegheny County," 158. Addison was a teacher as a young man inScotland. 6 Historians have generally assumed that Addison's conservatism and his Federalism were consistent throughout his tenure. Note that Ferguson (Early Western Pennsylvania Politics, 115) concludes that "During the ten years from 1790 to 1800 ... [Addison] was a bulwark of Federalism in the region. .. ." Professor Higginbotham also leaves the impression that Addison criticized democracy inhis charges to grand juries throughout his career on the bench, and Professor Ellis tells us that Addison was "an uncompromising Federalist" from the beginning. See Higginbotham, Keystone in the Democratic Arch, 53, and Ellis, The Jeffersonian Crisis, 164. Three modern historians have appre- ciated that change occurred in Addison's thought over time, but none has sought to chart the specifics of those shifts. David H.Fischer (The Revolu- tion of American Conservatism: The
Recommended publications
  • Summer 2020 REDO for Online.Indd

    Summer 2020 REDO for Online.Indd

    Summer 2020 REVISED Summer 2020 at | cmu.edu/osher w CONSIDER A GIFT TO OSHER To make a contribution to the Osher 4.0 Capital Project, please call the office at 412.268.7489, go through the Osher website with a credit card, or mail a check to the office. All checks must be made payable to: "Carnegie Mellon University," with a memo of "Osher 4.0 Capital Project". Thank you in advance for your generosity. BOARD OF DIRECTORS CURRICULUM COMMITTEE OFFICE STAFF Jim Reitz, President Gary Bates Lyn Decker, Executive Director Allan Hribar, Vice-President Lester Berkowitz Olivia McCann, Administrator / Programs Jan Hawkins, Secretary John Brown Chelsea Prestia, Administrator / Publications Marcia Taylor, Treasurer Maureen Brown Kate Lehman, Administrator / General Office John Olmsted, Past President Flip Conti Ann Augustine Jan Davis Rosalie Barsotti Lyn Decker CATALOG EDITORS Gary Bates Mary Duquin Chelsea Prestia, Editor Jeffrey Holst Anna Estop Olivia McCann Ann Isaac Byron Gottfried Helen-Faye Rosenblum Raja Sooriamurthi Marilyn Maiello Rosalyn Treger Jeffrey Swoger Enid Miller Kate Lehman Randy Weinberg Helen-Faye Rosenblum Mark Winer Judy Rubinstein CONTACT INFORMATION Rochelle Steiner Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Jeffrey Swoger Carnegie Mellon University Rebecca Culyba, Randy Weinberg Associate Provost 4614 Wean Hall and University Liaison 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3815 Please include your return address on all mail sent to the Osher office. Phone: 412.268.7489 Email: [email protected] Website: cmu.edu/osher ON THE COVER Though the Gates and Hillman Centers usually provide a space for intellectual stimulation, the outdoor volleyball court allows for a sense of relaxation and rejuvenation for the CMU community.
  • THE CORRESPONDENCE of ISAAC CRAIG DURING the WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A

    THE CORRESPONDENCE of ISAAC CRAIG DURING the WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A

    "SUCH DISORDERS CAN ONLY BE CURED BY COPIOUS BLEEDINGS": THE CORRESPONDENCE OF ISAAC CRAIG DURING THE WHISKEY REBELLION Edited by Kenneth A. White of the surprisingly underutilized sources on the early history Oneof Pittsburgh is the Craig Papers. Acase inpoint is Isaac Craig's correspondence during the Whiskey Rebellion. Although some of his letters from that period have been published, 1 most have not. This omission is particularly curious, because only a few eyewitness ac- counts of the insurrection exist and most ofthose were written from an Antifederalist viewpoint. These letters have a value beyond the narration of events, how- ever. One of the questions debated by historians is why the federal government resorted to force to put down the insurrection. Many have blamed Alexander Hamilton for the action, attributing it to his per- sonal approach to problems or to his desire to strengthen the central government. 2 These critics tend to overlook one fact : government officials make decisions based not only on their personal philosophy but also on the facts available to them. As a federal officer on the scene, Craig provided Washington and his cabinet with their informa- Kenneth White received his B.A. and M.A.degrees from Duquesne Uni- versity. While working on his master's degree he completed internships with the Adams Papers and the Institute of Early American History and Culture. Mr. White is presently working as a fieldarchivist for the Pennsylvania His- torical and Museum Commission's County Records Survey and Planning Study.— Editor 1 Portions of this correspondence have been published. For example, all or parts of six of these letters appeared in Harold C.
  • Artist, Attorney Present Two Views of the Innocence Project by Beth Orbison, Esq

    Artist, Attorney Present Two Views of the Innocence Project by Beth Orbison, Esq

    the side bar THE NEWSLETTER OF THE WESTMORELAND BAR ASSOCIATION VOLUME XXI, NUMBER 4 AUGUST 2009 Wrongful Convictions Artist, Attorney Present Two Views of The Innocence Project by Beth Orbison, Esq. is a series of breathtaking portraits done in an rongful expressionistic style that convictions are depicts the complicated, W not isolated, emotional landscapes of rare events. Innocent men who have suffered people languishing in years of incarceration prison or worse—being put for crimes they did not to death for crimes they did commit. In doing these not commit—should be paintings for the exhibit— intolerable to everyone,” simply entitled “Resurrected” says Dan Bolick about why in the Walsh Gallery at the he was inspired to paint Westmoreland Museum larger-than-life portraits of until September 6, 2009— ten wrongfully convicted L Bolick wanted to humanize men who were exonerated Artist Daniel Bolick and Innocence Project Staff Attorney Craig the men, literally giving a as a result of the efforts of Cooley were the featured speakers at the WBA Summer Quarterly face to their plight, and to The Innocence Project. Meeting held at the Westmoreland Museum of American Art in July. demonstrate that this could The Innocence Project is happen to anyone. an organization dedicated to using the meeting at the Westmoreland Museum Mr. Cooley, a native of Plum latest scientific evidence to exonerate of American Art where featured Borough in Allegheny County, is wrongfully convicted men and women. speakers—artist Daniel Bolick and one of six full-time staff attorneys who Founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck Craig M.
  • The Trial of David Bradford by William Cameron © 2019 Page | 1 (A

    The Trial of David Bradford by William Cameron © 2019 Page | 1 (A

    The Trial of David Bradford by William Cameron © 2019 P a g e | 1 (A courtroom. The actor portraying Daniel REDICK, in plain contemporary dress, addresses the audience.) REDICK David Bradford got away. The Whiskey Rebellion’s notorious leader escaped and never faced trial for his allegedly treasonous actions during the Insurrection of 1794. According to the tale that everyone tells but no one believes, David Bradford was enjoying the comforts of his palatial home, perhaps enjoying a whiskey, when word came that a cavalry unit with orders to arrest him was just outside the gate. Our intrepid protagonist leapt from a rear second-story window onto his faithful steed who, by some miracle, was not only saddled up and ready to go, but knew just where to stand. David then rode off into the autumn night, the cavalry hot on his trail but clearly no match for his superior horsemanship. (The actor begins to don his costume—suitable for a prominent attorney in 1795 America.) It’s nonsense, of course. In truth, Bradford left town in a most unhurried fashion and traveled in relative comfort on a coal barge down the Ohio River. I’m sure it was a most pleasant voyage. (Beat, as the actor dons his wig, continues to prepare.) I like to believe David Bradford made up that first story himself. It does allow him a mythical status that, perhaps, he deserves. Of course, he could’ve secured that status in another way, and that is what brings us here this evening. Let’s imagine, shall we, that, oh…say, when David Bradford leapt from that rear window, his horse wasn’t quite so accommodating, and the poor man ended up on his seditious backside in the rose bushes.
  • Benjamin Franklin

    Benjamin Franklin

    Benjamin Franklin Benjamin Franklin FRS FRSA FRSE (January 17, 1706 [O.S. January 6, 1705][Note 1] – April 17, 1790) was a British American polymath and one of the Founding Fathers of the Benjamin Franklin United States. Franklin was a leading writer, printer, political philosopher, politician, FRS, FRSA, FRSE Freemason, postmaster, scientist, inventor, humorist, civic activist, statesman, and diplomat. As a scientist, he was a major figure in the American Enlightenment and the history of physics for his discoveries and theories regarding electricity. As an inventor, he is known for the lightning rod, bifocals, and the Franklin stove, among other inventions.[1] He founded many civic organizations, including the Library Company, Philadelphia's first fire department,[2] and the University of Pennsylvania.[3] Franklin earned the title of "The First American" for his early and indefatigable campaigning for colonial unity, initially as an author and spokesman in London for several colonies. As the first United States ambassador to France, he exemplified the emerging American nation.[4] Franklin was foundational in defining the American ethos as a marriage of the practical values of thrift, hard work, education, community spirit, self- governing institutions, and opposition to authoritarianism both political and religious, with the scientific and tolerant values of the Enlightenment. In the words of historian Henry Steele Commager, "In a Franklin could be merged the virtues of Puritanism without its Benjamin Franklin by Joseph defects, the illumination
  • Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia

    Martin's Bench and Bar of Philadelphia

    MARTIN'S BENCH AND BAR OF PHILADELPHIA Together with other Lists of persons appointed to Administer the Laws in the City and County of Philadelphia, and the Province and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania BY , JOHN HILL MARTIN OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR OF C PHILADELPHIA KKKS WELSH & CO., PUBLISHERS No. 19 South Ninth Street 1883 Entered according to the Act of Congress, On the 12th day of March, in the year 1883, BY JOHN HILL MARTIN, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. W. H. PILE, PRINTER, No. 422 Walnut Street, Philadelphia. Stack Annex 5 PREFACE. IT has been no part of my intention in compiling these lists entitled "The Bench and Bar of Philadelphia," to give a history of the organization of the Courts, but merely names of Judges, with dates of their commissions; Lawyers and dates of their ad- mission, and lists of other persons connected with the administra- tion of the Laws in this City and County, and in the Province and Commonwealth. Some necessary information and notes have been added to a few of the lists. And in addition it may not be out of place here to state that Courts of Justice, in what is now the Com- monwealth of Pennsylvania, were first established by the Swedes, in 1642, at New Gottenburg, nowTinicum, by Governor John Printz, who was instructed to decide all controversies according to the laws, customs and usages of Sweden. What Courts he established and what the modes of procedure therein, can only be conjectur- ed by what subsequently occurred, and by the record of Upland Court.
  • 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.]

    12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.]

    CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS December 5, 2005 [Cite as 12/05/2005 Case Announcements #2, 2005-Ohio-6408.] MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS On December 2, 2005, the Supreme Court issued orders suspending 13,800 attorneys for noncompliance with Gov.Bar R. VI, which requires attorneys to file a Certificate of Registration and pay applicable fees on or before September 1, 2005. The text of the entry imposing the suspension is reproduced below. This is followed by a list of the attorneys who were suspended. The list includes, by county, each attorney’s Attorney Registration Number. Because an attorney suspended pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI can be reinstated upon application, an attorney whose name appears below may have been reinstated prior to publication of this notice. Please contact the Attorney Registration Section at 614/387-9320 to determine the current status of an attorney whose name appears below. In re Attorney Registration Suspension : ORDER OF [Attorney Name] : SUSPENSION Respondent. : : [Registration Number] : Gov.Bar R. VI(1)(A) requires all attorneys admitted to the practice of law in Ohio to file a Certificate of Registration for the 2005/2007 attorney registration biennium on or before September 1, 2005. Section 6(A) establishes that an attorney who fails to file the Certificate of Registration on or before September 1, 2005, but pays within ninety days of the deadline, shall be assessed a late fee. Section 6(B) provides that an attorney who fails to file a Certificate of Registration and pay the fees either timely or within the late registration period shall be notified of noncompliance and that if the attorney fails to file evidence of compliance with Gov.Bar R.
  • The Whiskey Rebellion and a Fractured Early Republic

    The Whiskey Rebellion and a Fractured Early Republic

    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 12-2013 A Nation That Wasn't: The Whiskey Rebellion and a Fractured Early Republic Kevin P. Whitaker Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Whitaker, Kevin P., "A Nation That Wasn't: The Whiskey Rebellion and a Fractured Early Republic" (2013). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 345. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/345 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A NATION THAT WASN'T: THE WHISKEY REBELLION AND A FRACTURED EARLY REPUBLIC by Kevin P. Whitaker A plan-B thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Approved: ________________________ ________________________ Kyle T. Bulthuis Keri Holt Major Professor Committee Member __________________________ James E. Sanders Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, UT 2013 1 Scholars often present nationalism as a cohesive social construction, modeled on Benedict Anderson's theory of imagined communities.1 The strength and popularity of Anderson's immensely useful paradigm of nationalism, however, perhaps leads to excited scholars over-extending his theory or seeing imagined communities that are little more than imaginary. The early Republic forms one such historical time period where, evidence suggests, historians have conjured nationalism where only a fractured nation existed.
  • The Following Excerpt from the Book "Law Miscellanies" by Hugh Henry

    The Following Excerpt from the Book "Law Miscellanies" by Hugh Henry

    The following excerpt from the book "Law Miscellanies" by Hugh Henry Backenridge was edited and published on this site by Richard R Gideon In 1814, two years before his death, Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Hugh Henry Brackenridge published a book that he intended as an introduction to the study of law. It had the ponderous title, "LAW MISCELLANIES: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LAW, NOTES ON BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES, SHEWING THE VARIATIONS OF THE LAW OF PENNSYLVANIA FROM THE LAW OF ENGLAND, AND WHAT ACTS OF ASSEMBLY MIGHT REQUIRE TO BE REPEALED OR MODIFIED; OBSERVATIONS ON SMITH'S EDITION OF THE LAWS OF PENNSYLVANIA; STRICTURES ON DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ON CERTAIN ACTS OF CONGRESS, WITH SOME LAW CASES, AND A VARIETY OF OTHER MATTERS, CHIEFLY ORIGINAL." Although meant for law students, and rather dry in most places, Brackenridge nonetheless opens up new perspectives on the early Federal period in America. Hugh Henry Barckenridge was born in Scotland and emigrated to America with his parents when only five years of age. He was possessed of a superior intellect and took degrees from Princeton University, then know as the College of New Jersey. Admitted to the practice of law in 1781, and deciding there were too many lawyers in his Philadelphia hometown, Brackenridge removed to the Western country and the village of Pittsburgh. He quickly established himself in practice and local politics. Over time Brackenridge's career took many twists and turns; he was at times very popular with the locals, but often exercised his talent for rubbing people the wrong way.
  • The Distinguished Life of Hugh Henry Brackenridge ..By Richard R

    The Distinguished Life of Hugh Henry Brackenridge ..By Richard R

    The Distinguished Life of Hugh Henry Brackenridge ..by Richard R. Gideon In July of 1794 a powerfully built Scottish immigrant made his way from Pittsburgh to attend a meeting at Mingo Creek, Pennsylvania. His objective was to become a moderating voice of reason in a room filled with budding revolutionaries. In later years historians would record this meeting as one of a series of acts collectively known as the Whiskey Insurrection or Whiskey Rebellion, the first real test of the authority of the newly created Federal government. The Scotsman’s name was Hugh Henry Brackenridge, a self-made man and product of early American intellectualism. Among his friends were James Madison, William Bradford and Philip Freneau, the latter a collaborator on a book called "Father Bombo's Pilgrimage to Mecca in Arabia" and a patriotic poem called ``The Rising Glory of America.'' Father Bombo, a satire based on a feud between rival clubs at Princeton University, is now recognized as the first novel written in America. In later life Brackenridge would write his masterpiece, a work called "Modern Chivalry." Described as a comic narrative, a combination of Don Quixote and Tom Jones, Modern Chivalry became a staple of 19th Century American literature. Mark Twain called the book "a classic." But then literature was only one area of accomplishment for the Honorable Mr. Brackenridge. Beginnings Hugh Henry Brackenridge was born in Scotland in 1748. His parents immigrated to York County, Pennsylvania, when Hugh was five years old. Unlike many a poor farmer’s son, Hugh was a natural scholar. He received his early education in part from the local country school, but mainly from a Presbyterian clergyman of the region who tutored him in Latin and Greek.
  • J Would Warn, Therefore, a Son of Mine Against Too Much Attention to Some Parts Of

    J Would Warn, Therefore, a Son of Mine Against Too Much Attention to Some Parts Of

    224 Hugh Henry Brackenridge, Writer HUGH HENRY BRACKENRIDGE, WRITER* Claude M. Newlin In 1806, when Hugh Henry Brackenridge was fifty- eight years old and a judge of the Supreme Court of Penn- sylvania, he reviewed his literary career. His opinion of his accomplishments as an author and his statement re- garding the place of literature in his life's work make per- haps the best preface to a study of his writings. At the end of a postscript to Gazette Publications he said: "One thing Iwilladd inexcuse of employing so much of my time, and whatever talents Imay possess, in what may seem to be of too light a nature for a serious mind, that the taste for playful humour, and the habit of versifying was con- tracted in early life, from the want of a monitor to direct resistance to the propensity; and at the same time that I present the result to the public, Imust caution others to beware of the indulgence. Itis not an age or country, that willmaka it the means of emolument, or the way to honour. And though Iwould rather be the poet than the Maecenas as to after-fame, yet it is better to be the Mae- cenas as to present enjoyment. J would warn, therefore, a son of mine against too much attention to some parts of Biographical note. Hugh Henry Brackenridge, the son of a poor farmer, was born near Campbeltown, Scotland, in 1748. In 1753 the family emigrated to America and settled in York Coun- ty, Pennsylvania. At the age of fifteen Brackenridge taught a school in Maryland.
  • HUGH HENRY BRACKENRIDGE and the ORDER of the CINCINNATI John E

    HUGH HENRY BRACKENRIDGE and the ORDER of the CINCINNATI John E

    HUGH HENRY BRACKENRIDGE AND THE ORDER OF THE CINCINNATI John E. Van Domelen Society of the Cincinnati had been under attack long before the relatively mild strictures of Hugh Henry Brackenridge ap- Them peared inModern Chivalry in 1792. Before its first general meet- ing at Philadelphia in May, 1784, the Order of the Cincinnati had already aroused much adverse criticism inthe newly established United States. 1 Aedanus Burke, a member of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, had written a pamphlet, 2 first printed in Charleston on October 10, 1783, under the pseudonym Cassius; the epigraph of the pamphlet was "Blow ye the Trumpet in Zion," and Burke proceeded to sound the alarm against the dangers he saw in the organization. It was his attack upon the aristocratic tendencies of the hereditary order which focused the attention of the American people upon the supposed dangers inherent in the Society. 3 The Society of the Cincinnati was formed in April, 1783, by offi- cers of the Continental Army at the suggestion of General Henry Knox.4 It was founded for fraternal, patriotic, and allegedly non- political aims. George Washington was its first president; however, Washington was evidently drafted for the office and knew little about the organization or the duties of his position. 5 He apparently was never the prime mover of the Society, for when he was reelected to the presidency of the order in 1786 he accepted only on condition that he be excused from performing the duties of office.6 He continued to serve as the Society's president until his death in 1799.