DOCSLIB.ORG

Aralia Elata

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aralia Elata NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Scientific name: Aralia elata USDA Plants Code: AREL8 Common names: Japanese angelica tree Native distribution: East Asia Date assessed: April 9, 2008; 21 July 2008 Assessors: Jinshuang Ma, Gerry Moore Reviewers: LIISMA SRC Date Approved: 2008-8-11 Form version date: 2008-10-22 New York Invasiveness Rank: Very High (Relative Maximum Score >80.00) Distribution and Invasiveness Rank (Obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form ) PRISM Status of this species in each PRISM: Current Distribution Invasiveness Rank 1 Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Not Assessed 2 Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Not Assessed 3 Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Not Assessed 4 Finger Lakes Not Assessed Not Assessed 5 Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Widespread High 6 Lower Hudson Not Assessed Not Assessed 7 Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Not Assessed 8 Western New York Not Assessed Not Assessed Invasiveness Ranking Summary Total (Total Answered*) Total (see details under appropriate sub-section) Possible 1 Ecological impact 40 ( 30 ) 21 2 Biological characteristic and dispersal ability 25 ( 25 ) 20 3 Ecological amplitude and distribution 25 ( 25 ) 23 4 Difficulty of control 10 ( 7) 6 Outcome score 100 ( 87 )b 70 a † Relative maximum score 80.46 § New York Invasiveness Rank Very High (Relative Maximum Score >80.00) * For questions answered “unknown” do not include point value in “Total Answered Points Possible.” If “Total Answered Points Possible” is less than 70.00 points, then the overall invasive rank should be listed as “Unknown.” †Calculated as 100(a/b) to two decimal places. §Very High >80.00; High 70.00−80.00; Moderate 50.00−69.99; Low 40.00−49.99; Insignificant <40.00 A. DISTRIBUTION (KNOWN/POTENTIAL): Summarized from individual PRISM forms A1.1. Has this species been documented to persist without cultivation in NY? (reliable source; voucher not required) Yes – continue to A1.2 No – continue to A2.1 A1.2. In which PRISMs is it known (see inset map)? Adirondack Park Invasive Program Capital/Mohawk Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Finger Lakes Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Lower Hudson Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Western New York 1 NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Documentation: Sources of information: Weldy & Werier, 2005; Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 2008. A2.1. What is the likelihood that this species will occur and persist outside of cultivation given the climate in the following PRISMs? (obtain from PRISM invasiveness ranking form) Not Assessed Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Finger Lakes Very Likely Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Not Assessed Lower Hudson Not Assessed Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Western New York Documentation: Sources of information (e.g.: distribution models, literature, expert opinions): Weldy & Werier, 2005; Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 2008. If the species does not occur and is not likely to occur with any of the PRISMs, then stop here as there is no need to assess the species. A2.2. What is the current distribution of the species in each PRISM? (obtain rank from PRISM invasiveness ranking forms ) Distribution Adirondack Park Invasive Program Not Assessed Capital/Mohawk Not Assessed Catskill Regional Invasive Species Partnership Not Assessed Finger Lakes Not Assessed Long Island Invasive Species Management Area Widespread Lower Hudson Not Assessed Saint Lawrence/Eastern Lake Ontario Not Assessed Western New York Not Assessed Documentation: Sources of information: Weldy & Werier, 2005; Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 2008. A2.3. Describe the potential or known suitable habitats within New York. Natural habitats include all habitats not under active human management. Managed habitats are indicated with an asterisk. Aquatic Habitats Wetland Habitats Upland Habitats Salt/brackish waters Salt/brackish marshes Cultivated* Freshwater tidal Freshwater marshes Grasslands/old fields Rivers/streams Peatlands Shrublands Natural lakes and ponds Shrub swamps Forests/woodlands Vernal pools Forested wetlands/riparian Alpine Reservoirs/impoundments* Ditches* Roadsides* Beaches and/or coastal dunes Other potential or known suitable habitats within New York: Documentation: Sources of information: Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 2008 Lindberg pers. comm. 2 NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM B. INVASIVENESS RANKING 1. ECOLOGICAL IMPACT 1.1. Impact on Natural Ecosystem Processes and System-Wide Parameters (e.g. fire regime, geomorphological changes (erosion, sedimentation rates), hydrologic regime, nutrient and mineral dynamics, light availability, salinity, pH) A. No perceivable impact on ecosystem processes based on research studies, or the absence of 0 impact information if a species is widespread (>10 occurrences in minimally managed areas), has been well-studied (>10 reports/publications), and has been present in the northeast for >100 years. B. Influences ecosystem processes to a minor degree (e.g., has a perceivable but mild influence 3 on soil nutrient availability) C. Significant alteration of ecosystem processes (e.g., increases sedimentation rates along 7 streams or coastlines, reduces open water that are important to waterfowl) D. Major, possibly irreversible, alteration or disruption of ecosystem processes (e.g., the 10 species alters geomorphology and/or hydrology, affects fire frequency, alters soil pH, or fixes substantial levels of nitrogen in the soil making soil unlikely to support certain native plants or more likely to favor non-native species) U. Unknown Score U Documentation: Identify ecosystem processes impacted (or if applicable, justify choosing answer A in the absence of impact information) Species only recently reported to be invasive in the United States; studies on ecosystem processes not done. Sources of information: 1.2. Impact on Natural Community Structure A. No perceived impact; establishes in an existing layer without influencing its structure 0 B. Influences structure in one layer (e.g., changes the density of one layer) 3 C. Significant impact in at least one layer (e.g., creation of a new layer or elimination of an 7 existing layer) D. Major alteration of structure (e.g., covers canopy, eradicating most or all layers below) 10 U. Unknown Score 7 Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: In woodlands it can create a new understory layer thus shading species below it. Sources of information: Moore et al, in press; author's (Moore's) personal observations. 1.3. Impact on Natural Community Composition A. No perceived impact; causes no apparent change in native populations 0 B. Influences community composition (e.g., reduces the number of individuals in one or more 3 native species in the community) C. Significantly alters community composition (e.g., produces a significant reduction in the 7 population size of one or more native species in the community) D. Causes major alteration in community composition (e.g., results in the extirpation of one or 10 several native species, reducing biodiversity or change the community composition towards species exotic to the natural community) U. Unknown Score 7 3 NEW YORK NON -NATIVE PLANT INVASIVENESS RANKING FORM Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: Invasion of this species in woodland communities can result in the reduction of native plant communities. Author (Moore) has followed the spread of this species along with the concurrent decline of native species (spring ephemeral wildflowers) in Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx over the past six years. Sources of information: Moore et al., in press; author's (Moore's) personal observations. 1.4. Impact on other species or species groups (cumulative impact of this species on the animals, fungi, microbes, and other organisms in the community it invades. Examples include reduction in nesting/foraging sites; reduction in habitat connectivity; injurious components such as spines, thorns, burrs, toxins; suppresses soil/sediment microflora; interferes with native pollinators and/or pollination of a native species; hybridizes with a native species; hosts a non-native disease which impacts a native species) A. Negligible perceived impact 0 B. Minor impact 3 C. Moderate impact 7 D. Severe impact on other species or species groups 10 U. Unknown Score 7 Documentation: Identify type of impact or alteration: Field observation by author (Moore) has revealed that there is little growth of vegetation below stands of Aralia elata. Published research inidactes that Aralia elata does prevent the growth of other plants nearby. Large spines also make movement in these stands difficult. Sources of information: Miyajima, 1992; Author's (Moore's) personal observations. Total Possible 30 Section One Total 21 2. BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND DISPERSAL ABILITY 2.1. Mode and rate of reproduction (provisional thresholds, more investigation needed) A. No reproduction by seeds or vegetative propagules (i.e. plant sterile with no sexual or 0 asexual reproduction). B. Limited reproduction (fewer than 10 viable seeds per plant AND no vegetative 1 reproduction; if viability is not known, then maximum seed production is less than 100 seeds per plant and no vegetative reproduction) C. Moderate reproduction (fewer than 100 viable seeds per plant - if viability is not known, 2 then maximum seed production is less than 1000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2014 Plant Species List
    Acanthaceae Hygrophila Occasional lacustris Acanthaceae Justicia ovata Uncommon Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis Common Acanthaceae Ruellia nudiflora s.n. Uncommon Acanthaceae Ruellia Occasional pedunculata Aceraceae Acer rubrum Occasional Agavaceae Yucca louisianica Uncommon Aiozaceae Molluga Occasional verticillata Alismataceae Echinodorus Occasional cordifolius Alismataceae Sagittaria Rare papillosa Alismataceae Sagittaria 156 Uncommon platyphylla Alliaceae Allium Occasional canadense var. canadense Alliaceae Allium Occasional canadense var. mobilense Alliaceae Allium 96, Uncommon drummondii 124 (Keith 96, 124) Amaranthaceae Alternanthera Common philoxeroides Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Uncommon liriosome Anacardiaceae Rhus aromatica Uncommon Anacardiaceae Rhus copallinum Occasional Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron Frequent radicans Apiaceae Bifora americana Common Apiaceae Centella erecta Uncommon Apiaceae Chaerophyllum Uncommon tainturieri Apiaceae Cicuta Uncommon maculatum Apiaceae Cynosciadium Uncommon digitatum Apiaceae Eryngium Common yuccifolium Apiaceae Hydrocotyle Occasional verticillata Apiaceae Polytaenia Frequent texana Apiaceae Ptilimnium Common capillaceum Apiaceae Ptilimnium Common nuttallii Apiaceae Spermolepsis Common inermis Apiaceae Torilis arvensis Occasional Apocynaceae Apocynum Occasional cannibinum Apocynaceae Nerium oleander Rare Apocynaceae Trachelospermu Occasional m difforme Aquifoliaceae Ilex decidua Common Aquifoliaceae Ilex opaca Common Aquifoliaceae Ilex vomitoria Abundant Araceae Arisaema Rare dracontium Araceae
    [Show full text]
  • Polyscias Pinnata1
    Fact Sheet FPS-489 October, 1999 Polyscias pinnata1 Edward F. Gilman2 Introduction Balfour Aralia is usually seen in its variegated form of glossy, light green leaves with irregular milk-white markings at its margins (Fig. 1). The stiffly upright growth habit, comprised of many stems, works well as a hedge or screen, or as a specimen. It grows nicely in a container for patio or terrace. The plant may thin out at the bottom as it grows older. Prune several of the older stems to the ground to encourage thicker foliage near the base. General Information Scientific name: Polyscias pinnata Pronunciation: poe-LISS-see-us pin-NAY-tuh Common name(s): Balfour Aralia Family: Araliaceae Plant type: shrub USDA hardiness zones: 10B through 11 (Fig. 2) Planting month for zone 10 and 11: year round Origin: not native to North America Uses: hedge; specimen; foundation; border; accent; cut Figure 1. Balfour Aralia. foliage/twigs; suitable for growing indoors Availablity: generally available in many areas within its Growth rate: slow hardiness range Texture: fine Description Foliage Height: 6 to 10 feet Spread: 2 to 4 feet Leaf arrangement: alternate Plant habit: round Leaf type: trifoliate Plant density: dense Leaf margin: dentate 1.This document is Fact Sheet FPS-489, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: October, 1999 Please visit the EDIS Web site at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Edward F. Gilman, professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrapanax Papyrifer SCORE: 12.0 RATING: High Risk (Hook.) K
    TAXON: Tetrapanax papyrifer SCORE: 12.0 RATING: High Risk (Hook.) K. Koch Taxon: Tetrapanax papyrifer (Hook.) K. Koch Family: Araliaceae Common Name(s): Chinese rice paper-plant Synonym(s): Aralia papyrifera Hook. rice paper plant Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 10 Oct 2018 WRA Score: 12.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Naturalized Shrub, Environmental Weed, Allergenic, Dense Stands, Suckers Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens y=1, n=0 n 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 y 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y=1, n=0 y Creation Date: 10 Oct 2018 (Tetrapanax papyrifer Page 1 of 16 (Hook.) K.
    [Show full text]
  • Araliaceae – Ginseng Family
    ARALIACEAE – GINSENG FAMILY Plant: some herbs (perennial), woody vines, shrubs and trees Stem: usually pithy Root: sometimes with rhizomes Leaves: simple or palmately compound but rarely 2’s or 3’s, often thickened and large, mostly alternate (rarely opposite or whorled); usually with stipules that forms a stem sheath; often with star-shaped hairs Flowers: mostly perfect or unisexual (monoecious or dioecious), regular (actinomorphic); flowers very small, mostly in umbels; sepals 5, often forming small teeth or none, mostly 5(-10) petals; mostly 5(-10) stamens; ovary inferior, 2-5 (10) fused carpels Fruit: berry or drupe, oily Other: mostly tropical and subtropical, a few oranamentals; similar to Apiaceae; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 70+ genera; locally Aralia (spikenard), Hedera (English Ivy), Oplopanax, Panax (ginseng) WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Araliaceae (Ginseng Family) – 5 (mostly) sepals and petals (often 5-lobed), often in umbels or compound umbels; leaves simple or more often compound; fruit a berry or drupe Examples of common genera Devil's Walkingstick [Hercules’ Club] Wild Sarsaparilla Aralia spinosa L. Aralia nudicaulis L. Devil's Club [Devil’s Walking Stick; Alaskan Ginseng] Oplopanax horridus (Sm.) Miq. English Ivy Hedera helix L. (Introduced) Dwarf Ginseng Panax trifolius L. ARALIACEAE – GINSENG FAMILY Wild Sarsaparilla; Aralia nudicaulis L. Devil's Walkingstick [Hercules’ Club]; Aralia spinosa L. English Ivy; Hedera helix L. (Introduced) Devil's Club [Devil’s
    [Show full text]
  • GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY Stephen Barstow1, Malvik, March 2020
    GIANT ULLEUNG CELERY 1 Stephen Barstow , Malvik, March 2020 Scientific name: Dystaenia takesimana Carrot family (Apiaceae) English: Seombadi, Sobadi, Dwaejipul, giant Ulleung celery, Korean pig-plant, wild celery, giant Korean celery Korean: 섬바디, 드와지풀 Norwegian: Ulleung kjempeselleri Swedish: Ullungloka, Vulkanloka The genus Dystaenia belongs to the carrot family or umbellifers (Apiaceae) and consists of two perennial species, one is a Japanese endemic (Dystaenia ibukiensis), and the other is endemic to a small island, Ulleung-do in Korea (Dystaenia takesimana). Genetic analysis (Pfosser et al., 2005) suggests that the larger D. takesimana evolved from D. ibukiensis rather than vice versa. The specific epithet takesimana is according to one reference to Takeshima Islet, which is disputed with the Japanese. Campanula takesimana is apparently found there. However, Takeshima island is also an alternative name for Ulleung-do, so this may be a misunderstanding. That Ulleung-do is Takeshima is confirmed on the following web site from the Oki Islands off Japan http://www.oki-geopark.jp/en/flowers-calendar/summer where it is stated that Dystaenia takesimana is also found there and is critically endangered: “This plant was designated as Cultural Property of Ama Town in 2012. It has only been discovered on the two isolated islands of Ama Town of the Oki Islands (Nakanoshima Island) and Ulleung-do Island of South Korea. It can be seen on the Akiya Coast in Nakanoshima Island. It is called Takeshima- shishiudo, as Ulleung-do was referred to as Takeshima” (see the map in Figure 1 for places mentioned here). Ulleung-do is a rocky steep-sided volcanic island some 120 km east of the coast of South Korea, the highest peak reaching 984m.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Big Tree Registry a List of the Largest Trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas a & M Forest Service
    Texas Big Tree Registry A list of the largest trees in Texas Sponsored by Texas A & M Forest Service Native and Naturalized Species of Texas: 320 ( D indicates species naturalized to Texas) Common Name (also known as) Latin Name Remarks Cir. Threshold acacia, Berlandier (guajillo) Senegalia berlandieri Considered a shrub by B. Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, blackbrush Vachellia rigidula Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' acacia, Gregg (catclaw acacia, Gregg catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. greggii Was named A. greggii 55'' or 4.6 ' acacia, Roemer (roundflower catclaw) Senegalia roemeriana 18'' or 1.5 ' acacia, sweet (huisache) Vachellia farnesiana 100'' or 8.3 ' acacia, twisted (huisachillo) Vachellia bravoensis Was named 'A. tortuosa' 9'' or 0.8 ' acacia, Wright (Wright catclaw) Senegalia greggii var. wrightii Was named 'A. wrightii' 70'' or 5.8 ' D ailanthus (tree-of-heaven) Ailanthus altissima 120'' or 10.0 ' alder, hazel Alnus serrulata 18'' or 1.5 ' allthorn (crown-of-thorns) Koeberlinia spinosa Considered a shrub by Simpson 18'' or 1.5 ' anacahuita (anacahuite, Mexican olive) Cordia boissieri 60'' or 5.0 ' anacua (anaqua, knockaway) Ehretia anacua 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Carolina Fraxinus caroliniana 90'' or 7.5 ' ash, Chihuahuan Fraxinus papillosa 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, fragrant Fraxinus cuspidata 18'' or 1.5 ' ash, green Fraxinus pennsylvanica 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Gregg (littleleaf ash) Fraxinus greggii 12'' or 1.0 ' ash, Mexican (Berlandier ash) Fraxinus berlandieriana Was named 'F. berlandierana' 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, Texas Fraxinus texensis 60'' or 5.0 ' ash, velvet (Arizona ash) Fraxinus velutina 120'' or 10.0 ' ash, white Fraxinus americana 100'' or 8.3 ' aspen, quaking Populus tremuloides 25'' or 2.1 ' baccharis, eastern (groundseltree) Baccharis halimifolia Considered a shrub by Simpson 12'' or 1.0 ' baldcypress (bald cypress) Taxodium distichum Was named 'T.
    [Show full text]
  • Many-Uses-Of-Udo-PM83.Pdf
    THE MANY USES FAMILY: Araliaceae CHINESE: Shi Yong Tu Dang Gui ENGLISH: Japanese Asparagus, Udo of FRENCH: Aralie à Feuilles Cordées GERMAN: Japanische Bergangelika JAPANESE: Udo Stephen Barstow invites you to savour a remarkableU DOwild edible, Udo ralia cordata or udo is grown in many countries and deserves to be much more popular in the West. For what is basically Aa wild plant, it is remarkably productive, and the highest yielding vegetable that I have grown. It is a herbaceous perennial reaching 3m (9.8ft) tall in the course of the summer months. It is a close relative of ginseng (Panax ginseng) and is in fact some- times used as a substitute for the latter. There are about eight herbaceous Aralia species restricted to North America and Asia. Udo is wild-foraged in Japan, Korea and China but so popular in Japan that it is now cultivated. Author Joy Larkcom stumbled on cultivated plants in a market in Tokyo in the 1990s whilst researching her book, Oriental Vegetables, describing them as 60cm (23in) long with white stalks. Behind Larkcom’s blanched udo stalks lies a very unusual production method. So-called Nanpaku-udo, or simply Tokyo-udo, is cultivated mainly under- ground beneath Western Tokyo (Tachikawa and Kokubunji City). The roots are forced during the winter months in naturally warm subterranean caverns excavated in the special Kanto loam, of volcanic origin, which can be excavated without danger of collapse. These caverns were originally used to store vegetables, but have been used for forcing udo off-season since about 1927. A pit is first dug 3-4m (9.8-13ft) deep and then several horizontal tunnels are excavated from the bottom of the pit.
    [Show full text]
  • Araliaceae.Pdf
    ARALIACEAE 五加科 wu jia ke Xiang Qibai (向其柏 Shang Chih-bei)1; Porter P. Lowry II2 Trees or shrubs, sometimes woody vines with aerial roots, rarely perennial herbs, hermaphroditic, andromonoecious or dioecious, often with stellate indumentum or more rarely simple trichomes or bristles, with or without prickles, secretory canals pres- ent in most parts. Leaves alternate, rarely opposite (never in Chinese taxa), simple and often palmately lobed, palmately compound, or 1–3-pinnately compound, usually crowded toward apices of branches, base of petiole often broad and sheathing stem, stipules absent or forming a ligule or membranous border of petiole. Inflorescence terminal or pseudo-lateral (by delayed development), um- bellate, compound-umbellate, racemose, racemose-umbellate, or racemose-paniculate, ultimate units usually umbels or heads, occa- sionally racemes or spikes, flowers rarely solitary; bracts usually present, often caducous, rarely foliaceous. Flowers bisexual or unisexual, actinomorphic. Pedicels often jointed below ovary and forming an articulation. Calyx absent or forming a low rim, some- times undulate or with short teeth. Corolla of (3–)5(–20) petals, free or rarely united, mostly valvate, sometimes imbricate. Stamens usually as many as and alternate with petals, sometimes numerous, distinct, inserted at edge of disk; anthers versatile, introrse, 2- celled (or 4-celled in some non-Chinese taxa), longitudinally dehiscent. Disk epigynous, often fleshy, slightly depressed to rounded or conic, sometimes confluent with styles. Ovary inferior (rarely secondarily superior in some non-Chinese taxa), (1 or)2–10(to many)-carpellate; carpels united, with as many locules; ovules pendulous, 2 per locule, 1 abortive; styles as many as carpels, free or partially united, erect or recurved, or fully united to form a column; stigmas terminal or decurrent on inner face of styles, or sessile on disk, circular to elliptic and radiating.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistaken Identity? Invasive Plants and Their Native Look-Alikes: an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic
    Mistaken Identity ? Invasive Plants and their Native Look-alikes an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic Matthew Sarver Amanda Treher Lenny Wilson Robert Naczi Faith B. Kuehn www.nrcs.usda.gov http://dda.delaware.gov www.dsu.edu www.dehort.org www.delawareinvasives.net Published by: Delaware Department Agriculture • November 2008 In collaboration with: Claude E. Phillips Herbarium at Delaware State University • Delaware Center for Horticulture Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Cover Photos: Front: Aralia elata leaf (Inset, l-r: Aralia elata habit; Aralia spinosa infloresence, Aralia elata stem) Back: Aralia spinosa habit TABLE OF CONTENTS About this Guide ............................1 Introduction What Exactly is an Invasive Plant? ..................................................................................................................2 What Impacts do Invasives Have? ..................................................................................................................2 The Mid-Atlantic Invasive Flora......................................................................................................................3 Identification of Invasives ..............................................................................................................................4 You Can Make a Difference..............................................................................................................................5 Plant Profiles Trees Norway Maple vs. Sugar
    [Show full text]
  • Intergeneric Graft Compatibility Within the Family Araliaceae
    RESEARCH UPDATES Fatshedera ( Fatsia x Hedera) that have Materials and methods Intergeneric been grown erect are sold as novelty specimens. Growers usually get a high Twenty-three cultivars of Graft percentage of successful grafts with Araliaceae representing six genera and Compatibility healthy plant material and good graft- 16 species were obtained from com- ing technique. mercial sources. Two species each of within the Family Variegated forms of Aralia elata two genera native to Hawaii, do not root from cuttings and produce Cheirodendron and Tetraplasandra, Araliaceae nonvariegated seedlings. The varie- were collected in the Koolau Moun- gated forms are propagated by bud- tains on Oahu (Table 1). ding onto seedling or vegetatively Rootstocks propagated from tip Kenneth W. Leonhardt1 produced nonvariegated rootstocks of cuttings rooted in equal parts ver- A. elata (Leiss, 1977). One variegated miculite and perlite under intermit- form of A. elata also has been cleft- tent mist and full sun were grown in Additional index words. Aralia, grafted successfully onto a rootstock 15-cm plastic pots containing equal Ginsing, Panax family, propagation of A. spinosa (Raulston, 1985.) parts peat moss, perlite, and field soil The relative ease of the Hedera x (by volume). Lime and a slow-release Summary. Novelty Araliaceae potted Fatshedera graft raised the possibility granular fertilizer were incorporated. plants were created by a wide variety of graft compatibility of Hedera with Rootstocks were established in a green- of interspecific and intergeneric graft other relatives, particularly those grow- house under 25% shade cover until combinations. Twenty-four species of ing tall rapidly or having other desir- grafted.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Agency Guidelines for Implementing Best Management Practices to Control Invasive Species on DEC Administered Lands of the Adirondack Park
    Inter-Agency Guidelines for Implementing Best Management Practices to Control Invasive Species on DEC Administered Lands of the Adirondack Park Approved March 2018 Prepared by: NYS Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233 Adirondack Park Agency PO Box 99 Ray Brook, NY 12977 Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program 8 Nature Way Keene Valley, NY 12943 CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Goal of the Guidelines .................................................................................................................... 2 III. Objectives of the Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 3 IV. Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... 3 V. Present Extent of Invasive Species on DEC Administered Lands ................................................. 7 VI. Control of Invasive Species and Procedure for Implementation .................................................. 7 To Control Terrestrial Invasive Species: ......................................................................................... 7 To Control Aquatic Invasive Species: ............................................................................................. 8 VII. Best Management Practices for Invasive Species Spread Prevention ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Draft
    THE TREES AT HISTORIC YATES MILL This one-way self guided trail will introduce the hiker to twenty of the numerous tree species found at Historic Yates Mill County Park. As you walk this .25 mile mod- erately easy trail, notice the numbered posts. These posts correspond to numbered tree pictures found inside the brochure along with numbers shown on the trail map. A brief description of the tree along with an interesting fact relating to each tree is given to spark your interest and curiosity. More detailed information about trees along with other natural and historical aspects of the park is available at the park office or from a park staff member. Please feel free to visit after your hike. Once you’ve completed the tree trail, please note you may return by using the same trail. You may take the .78 mile Upper Ridge Trail or you may wish to finish the 1 mile Mill Pond Trail. Whatever route you choose we hope you enjoy your visit to Historic Yates Mill County Park and hope you return again soon. If you choose not to keep this map and guide, please return it to the bro- chure rack so another visitor may enjoy the trail as you have. A special note of thanks goes to Miss Rachel Harper of Cary for her research and design of the Trees at Historic Yates Mill Self-Guided Trail 1 Sycamore 6 Water Oak 11 Yellow Poplar 16 River Birch (Platanus occidentails) (Liriodendron tulipifera) (Quercus nigra) (Betula nigra) Grows 60 to 80 feet tall.
    [Show full text]