DOCSLIB.ORG

73Rd Aafs Annual Scientific Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
73Rd Aafs Annual Scientific Meeting AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 73RD AAFS ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING ADVANCE PROGRAM • FEBRUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Registration Information . 1 Officers & Officials . 2 Program Committee . 3 Awards . 4 Business Meetings . 6 Financial Contributors . 7 Continuing Education . 8 Calendar of Events . 10 Student Academy . 14 Interdisciplinary Symposium . 16 Young Forensic Scientists Forum Special Session . 18 Standards Consortium . 21. Forensic Science Education Programs Accreditation Commission Session . 22 Keynote Address . 24 Plenary Session . 25 Case Break Sessions . 27 Workshops . 32 Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center Poster Session . 70 National Institute of Justice . 72 Scientific Sessions Anthropology . 77 Criminalistics . 87 Digital & Multimedia Sciences . 103 Engineering & Applied Sciences . 106 General . 109 Jurisprudence . 118 Odontology . 122 Pathology/Biology . 124 Psychiatry & Behavioral Science . 138 Questioned Documents . 141 Toxicology . 144 Last Word Society . 150 YFSF Poster Sessions . 151 Program Committee Financial Disclosure . 153 Presenting Author Financial Disclosure . 156 Key Word Index . 167 Presenting Author Index . 178 i REGISTRATION INFORMATION Your registration fee includes the opportunity to claim continuing education credits, access to live and pre-recorded content for up to 90 days, virtual networking, and admission to the virtual exhibit hall. All persons attending must be at least 18 years of age at the time of the meeting. THREE WAYS TO REGISTER 1. Register online at www.aafs.org through the AAFS Web Account (https://webdata.aafs.org/aafsweb/Security/SignIn.aspx). 2. Scan and email your registration form to: [email protected]. 3. Mail your registration form, along with a check, money order, or purchase order, to: AAFS 410 North 21st Street Colorado Springs, CO 80904 (Checks must be drawn on a U.S. bank in U.S. funds, made payable to AAFS.) Faxed registration forms are not accepted. ONLINE REGISTRATION INFORMATION • Online registrants are required to have an AAFS Web Account to register for the meeting. • Current AAFS members or applicants will need to login to your AAFS Web Account to start your registration. • If you are not a member of the AAFS, but you are or have been an Author or Co-Author on a presentation (oral or poster) at an AAFS Annual Scientific Meeting, you will have an AAFS Web Account. • Use the “Forgot User Name or Password” button found on the AAFS Web Account page to retrieve a forgotten password. • If this is your first contact with the AAFS, you will need to create a new AAFS Web Account. Click the “Create Account” button on the Login Page. REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION • When you register online, you will receive an email confirmation immediately. • A confirmation email will be sent once your registration form has been processed. QUESTIONS If you have any questions or need assistance with registration, contact the AAFS Office at (719) 636-1100, ext. 111, or by email at: [email protected]. REGISTRATION FEES* Thru Jan. 18 Effective Jan. 19 1. AAFS Member, Trainee Affiliate, Applicant* $185 $225 2. Non-Member $280 $350 3. AAFS Student Affiliate $ 75 $ 90 4. Non-Member Student** $115 $140 5. AAFS Retired Fellow $ -0- $ -0- *Applicants must have a completed AAFS application on file by the application deadline. **Non-Member Students must submit an official Verification of Enrollment confirming enrollment during February 2021 to registration@aafsorg. Not available to those in postgraduate internships, residencies, or fellowships. REFUNDS All requests for refunds must be submitted by email to: [email protected]. Canceled registration fees will be refunded as follows: Prior to December 1 Full refund less $25 charge December 1-31 75% refund January 1-31 60% refund February 1-5 50% refund No refunds after February 5, 2021. 1 OFFICERS AND OFFICIALS Officers President: Jeri D. Ropero-Miller, PhD President-Elect: Carl R. McClary, MS Past President: Zeno J. Geradts, PhD Vice President: Laura C. Fulginiti, PhD Secretary: Christopher R. Thompson, MD Treasurer: C. Ken Williams, MS, JD Directors Anthropology: Jennifer C. Love, PhD Criminalistics: Anjali A. Ranadive, JD Digital & Multimedia Sciences: Marcus Rogers, PhD Engineering & Applied Sciences: Mark I. Marpet, PhD, PE General: Joanna L. Collins, MFS Jurisprudence: Roderick T. Kennedy, JD Odontology: Paula Brumit, DDS Pathology/Biology: James Louis Caruso, MD Psychiatry & Behavioral Science: Karen B. Rosenbaum, MD Questioned Documents: Thomas W. Vastrick, BS Toxicology: Sarah Kerrigan, PhD Section Officers Anthropology Odontology Chair: Kristen Hartnett-McCann, PhD Chair: Roger D. Metcalf, DDS, JD Secretary: Marin A. Pilloud, PhD Secretary: Robin A. Ainsworth, DDS Criminalistics Pathology/Biology Chair: Jennifer S. Mihalovich, MPH Chair: Carl J. Schmidt, MD Secretary: Sandra B. Sachs, PhD Secretary: Chris Milroy, MD, LLB Digital & Multimedia Sciences Psychiatry & Behavioral Science Chair: Jason M. Paroff, JD Chair: Dean Michael De Crisce, MD Secretary: Patrick A. Eller, MS Secretary: Eleanor B. Vo, MD Engineering & Applied Sciences Questioned Documents Chair: David Pienkowski, PhD Chair: Karen J. Nobles, BA Secretary: Robert Dale Lynch, BArch Secretary: Linda L. Mitchell, BS General Toxicology Chair: Steven C. Clark, PhD Chair: Sherri L. Kacinko, PhD Secretary: Melissa A. Connor, PhD Secretary: Sabra R. Botch-Jones, MS Jurisprudence Chair: Robert M. Sanger, JD Secretary: Donald E. Shelton, JD, PhD 2 PROGRAM COMMITTEE 2021 Annual Scientific Meeting Program Committee Program Chair: Gregory G. Davis, MD Program Co-Chair: Adam J. Freeman, DDS Plenary Session: Julie A. Howe, MBA; Douglas S. Lacey, MS Poster Sessions: Kate Spradley, PhD; Jan Seaman Kelly, BA Workshops: Sarah Kerrigan, PhD; Dean Michael De Crisce, MD Breakfast Seminars: Paul Messner, JD; Melissa A. Connor, PhD Luncheon Seminars: Andrew C. Seidel, PhD; Patrick Buzzini, PhD Last Word Society: Kenneth E. Melson, JD; Paula Brumit, DDS Bring Your Own Slides: Michael M. Baden, MD; J.C.U. Downs, MD; Joseph A. Prahlow, MD Student Academy: Marilyn T. Miller, EdD; Lynn A. Schneeweis, MS Interdisciplinary Symposium: Agnes D. Winokur, MS; Chris Milroy, MD, LLB Local Arrangements: Dayong Lee, PhD Academy Cup: Laura L. Liptai, PhD; Carla Miller Noziglia, MS Anthropology: Allysha P. Winburn, PhD; Krista E. Latham, PhD Criminalistics: Jason L. Linder, MFS; Peter J. Diaczuk, PhD Digital & Multimedia Sciences: Douglas R. White, MS; Kathryn C. Seigfried-Spellar, PhD Engineering & Applied Sciences: Kurt D. Weiss, MS General: Katherine M. Brown, PhD; Kimberlee Sue Moran, MSc Jurisprudence: Gary McDonald, Jr., JD; Terri Rosenblatt, JD Odontology: Denise C. Murmann, DDS Pathology/Biology: Jacqueline L. Parai, MD Psychiatry & Behavioral Science: Giuseppe Troccoli, MD; Jessica Morel, DO Questioned Documents: Samiah Ibrahim, BSc; Janet F. Masson, BJ Toxicology: Madeleine J. Swortwood, PhD; Amanda L.A. Mohr, MSFS Young Forensic Scientists Forum: Zain Bhaloo, MSc 3 AWARDS The 2021 awards will be presented during the 2022 AAFS Annual Scientific Meeting in Seattle, WA, during scheduled business meetings. Details will be provided ahead of the 2022 meeting. Please join us in acknowledging your most distinguished colleagues as they are presented with these prestigious awards. R.B.H. Gradwohl Laureate Medallion Carol Henderson, JD (posthumously) Distinguished Fellow Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran, MD Outstanding Early Career Achievement in Forensic Science Award Nicholas V. Passalacqua, PhD 2021 Section Award Honorees Anthropology Section’s T. Dale Stewart Award Dennis C. Dirkmaat, PhD J. Lawrence Angel Award Valerie Sgheiza, MA Outstanding Mentorship Award Dennis C. Dirkmaat, PhD Ellis R. Kerley Research Award Janna M. Andronowski, PhD Mary E. Cole, PhD Reed A. Davis, MSc Criminalistics Section’s Paul L. Kirk Award Moses S. Schanfield, PhD Mary E. Cowan Outstanding Service Award Lucy A. Davis, BHS Meritorious Service Award Peter J. Diaczuk, PhD Digital & Multimedia Sciences Section’s Outstanding Research Award Seth M. Eisenberg Anthony Koertner, MS Hillary Lathrop, PhD Christina A. Malone, MSFS General Section’s Paul W. Kehres Meritorious Service Award William B. Andrews, MFS Odontology Section’s Reidar F. Sognnaes Award Mary A. Bush, DDS Pathology/Biology Section’s Milton Helpern Award Stephen D. Cohle, MD Award for Achievement in the Forensic Life Sciences M. Eric Benbow, PhD Best Resident Paper Award Kristina-Ana Klaric, MD 4 AWARDS Psychiatry & Behavioral Science Section’s Rosner Best Paper Award Kathryn A. Cunningham, PsyD Toxicology Section’s Alexander O. Gettler Award Marilyn A. Huestis, PhD Irving Sunshine Award Madeleine J. Swortwood, PhD Ray Abernethy Award Rebecca Phipps, PhD Rolla N. Harger Award Kenneth E. Ferslew, PhD Annual Lectureship Award Johannes G. Ramaekers, PhD FSF Jan S. Bashinski Criminalistics Graduate Thesis Assistance Grant Recipient Rachelle A. Turiello, MS Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center’s Clyde Snow Award Recipient Douglas H. Ubelaker, PhD FSF Emerging Forensic Scientist Award Recipients Kamar Afra, MA J. Tyler Davidson, PhD David S.H. Funes, BS FSF Warren-Young Scholarship Recipient Ronald J. Moss, MSEd, MS AAFS Regional Awards Midwest Association for Toxicology & Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Kimberly Yacoub, MS Midwestern Association of Forensic Scientists: Dana L. Greeley, MSFS Southwestern Association of Toxicologists: Sarah E. Martin, MS 5 BUSINESS MEETINGS Attend Your Section’s Annual Business Meeting for a Chance to Win a Complimentary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visual Examination and Light Microscopy
    ASM Handbook, Volume 12: Fractography Copyright © 1987 ASM International® ASM Handbook Committee, p 91-165 All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1361/asmhba0001834 www.asminternational.org Visual Examination and Light Microscopy George F. Vander Voort, Carpenter Technology Corporation THE VISUAL EXAMINATION of fractures by light microscopy. Interesting features can be sections, to determine the origin of the failure, is deeply rooted in the history of metals pro- marked with a scribe, microhardness indents, and to separate the fractures according to the duction and usage, as discussed in the article or a felt-tip pen and then examined by SEM time sequence of failure, that is, which frac- "History of Fractography" in this Volume. and other procedures, such as energy- tures existed before the event versus which ones This important subject, referred to as macro- dispersive x-ray analysis, as required. occurred during the event. This article will fractography, or the examination of fracture The techniques and procedures for the visual assume that such work has already been accom- surfaces with the unaided human eye or at low and light microscopic examination of fracture plished and will concentrate on fracture exam- magnifications (--<50), is the cornerstone of surfaces will be described and illustrated in this ination and interpretation. Other related topics failure analysis. In addition, a number of qual- article. Results will also be compared and specific to failure analyses are discussed in ity control procedures rely on visual fracture contrasted with those produced by electron Volume 11 of the 9th Edition of Metals Hand- examinations. For failure analysis, visual in- metallographic methods, primarily SEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Forensic Chemistry
    FORENSIC CHEMISTRY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David E. Newton | 208 pages | 15 Nov 2008 | Facts on File Inc | 9780816078004 | English | New York, United States Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry - B.S. Forensic Chemistry Degree Mass Spectrometry MS breaks samples apart and separates the ionized fragments by mass and charge. Generally, forensic chemists are trained in organic chemistry. This ensures that the forensic chemists can run analysis on blood and other body samples to identify DNA. They are also trained in organic chemistry so that they can run toxicology screenings. It is also important for a forensic chemist to have knowledge of physics. There are also forensic chemists who specialize in certain areas, such as chemicals that are tied to explosives or arson. These chemists will be called to a crime scene to look at fire patterns when determining if arson was involved in a fire or they will be called to investigate chemicals associated with a bomb. Once becoming a forensic chemist, there are many places where a forensic chemist could work. A forensic chemist might work for a private lab, or at a national agency like the FBI. Twitter Facebook Instagram Youtube. Back to Crime Library. A mysterious white powder, a blood smear, and a moldy ham sandwich—completely unrelated items to most. But they could be meaningful for forensic chemists, who analyze physical evidence and samples for clues to solve crimes. Television shows such as Bones, CSI, and Dexter have glamorized forensic scientists and made the field more popular, so competition can be intense. However, if you have a strong desire to shape the world of justice by using science to solve crime puzzles, then a career in forensic science could be worth pursuing.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fractography of Impact-Tested Samples of Al-Si Alloys for Automotive Alloys Alloys for Automotive Alloys
    Provisional chapter Chapter 2 On the Fractography of Impact-Tested Samples of Al-Si On the Fractography of Impact-Tested Samples of Al-Si Alloys for Automotive Alloys Alloys for Automotive Alloys Zheyuan Ma, Agnes M. Samuel, ZheyuanHerbert W. Ma, Doty Agnes and M. Fawzy Samuel, H. Samuel Herbert W. Doty and Fawzy H. Samuel Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63409 Abstract Castings were prepared from both industrial and experimental 319.2, B319.2 and A356.2 alloy melts, containing Fe levels of 0.2–1.0 wt%. Stontium-modified (∼200 ppm) melts were also prepared for each alloy/Fe level. Impact testing of heat-treated samples was carried out using an instrumented Charpy impact testing machine. At low Fe levels and high cooling rates (0.4% Fe, dendrite arm spacing (DAS) of 23 μm), crack initiation and propagation in unmodified 319 alloys occur through the cleavage of β-Al5FeSi platelets (rather than by their decohesion from the matrix). The morphology of the platelets (individual or branched) is important in determining the direction of crack propagation. Cracks also propagate through the fracture of undissolved CuAl2 or other Cu interme- tallics, as well as through fragmented Si particles. In Sr-modified 319 alloys, cracks are mostly initiated by the fragmentation or cleavage of perforated β-phase platelets, in addition to that of coarse Si particles and undissolved Cu-intermetallics. In A356.2 alloys, cracks initiate mainly through the fracture of Si particles or their debonding from the Al matrix, while crack propagation occurs through the coalescence of fractured Si particles, except when β-Al5FeSi intermetallics are present, in which case the latter takes precedence.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Biometric and Forensic Technology: the Future of Research Datasets Symposium Report
    NISTIR 8156 Improving Biometric and Forensic Technology: The Future of Research Datasets Symposium Report Melissa Taylor Shannan Williams George Kiebuzinski This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8156 NISTIR 8156 Improving Biometric and Forensic Technology: The Future of Research Datasets Symposium Report Melissa Taylor Shannan Williams Forensic Science Research Program Special Programs Office National Institute of Standards and Technology George Kiebuzinski Noblis, Inc. This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8156 March 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Kent Rochford, Acting NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Summary of Workshop Presentations and Discussions ............................................................... 6 1.3 Findings ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trace Materials Crime Scene Investigation Guide
    This document is being made available so that the forensic science community and interested stakeholders can be more fully aware of the efforts and work products of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC). This document is a DRAFT which represents a work still in progress and is intended for future development into a web application. Therefore, please consider the content of the current version of the Trace Materials Crime Scene Investigation Guide but disregard the format, as the format will necessarily be overhauled upon adaptation of the document into a web application. Trace Materials Crime Scene Investigation Guide Draft Document 01.01 Table of Contents 01.02 Introduction 01.03 Evidence Collection and Packaging Overview 02 Sub-disciplines - 02.01 Airbags - 02.02 Explosives - 02. 03 Fibers - 02.03.01 Fabric damage and impressions - 02.03.02 Cordage - 02.04 Fire Debris - 02.05 Footwear and Tire Impressions - 02.06 Geological Material - 02.07 Glass - 02.08 Gunshot Residue - 02.09 Hairs - 02.10 Lamp/Filaments - 02.11 Paint - 02.12 Physical Fit - 02.13 Tape - 02.14 Other Types of Trace Evidence 03 Types of Crime Scenes - 03.01 Arson (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.02 Shooting (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.03 Stabbing (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.04 Manual Strangulation (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.05 Asphyxiation (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.05 Blunt Force Trauma (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.06 Sexual Assault - 03.07 Dumped Body (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.08 Wrapped or Bound Victim (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.09 Burglary (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.10 Suspicious Death (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.11 Explosion (TO BE INCLUDED) - 03.12 Hit-and-Run 04 Appendices - 04.01 Important Phone Numbers (TO BE INCLUDED) Introduction Trace evidence is a subset of forensic evidence that is scientifically analyzed to explore possible associations between people, places, and objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractography of Metals and Plastics
    FRACTOGRAPHY OF METALS AND PLASTICS Ronald J. Parrington, P.E. IMR Test Labs 131 Woodsedge Drive Lansing, NY 14882 Abstract behavior; (2) use thermal spalling to detach bedrock from the working core; and (3) shape stone by pressure flaking. Fractography is critical to failure analysis of metals and th plastics. Fractography of plastics is a relatively new field Fractography as we know it today, developed in the 16 with many similarities to metals. Utilizing case histories, century as a quality control practice employed for ferrous various aspects of failure analysis and fractography are and nonferrous metal working. “De La Pirotechnia” compared and contrasted. published by Vannoccio Biringuccio (1) in 1540 is one of the first documents to detail fractographic techniques. Common failure modes include ductile overload, brittle fracture, impact and fatigue. Analogies can also be drawn Invention of the optical microscope in 1600 provided a between stress corrosion cracking (SCC)/stress cracking, significant new tool for fractography. Yet it was not th corrosion/chemical aging, dealloying/scission, residual utilized extensively by metallurgists until the 18 century. stress/frozen-in stress, and welds/knit lines. Stress raisers, In 1722, R.A. de Réaumur (2) published a book with microstructure, material defects, and thermo -mechanical engravings depicting macroscopic and microscopic history play important roles in both cases. Key fracture surfaces of iron and steel. Interestingly, the fractographic features for metals and plastics are described. categories of macroscopic features developed by de Réaumur have remained essentially unchanged through the Historical Perspective centuries. Plastics have been in existence for approximately 130 Partly due to the development of metallographic techniques for examining cross sections of metals, interest years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Review on Fracture Mechanisms of Mechanical Components Operated Under Industrial Process Conditions: Fractographic Analysis and Selected Prevention Strategies
    metals Review A Short Review on Fracture Mechanisms of Mechanical Components Operated under Industrial Process Conditions: Fractographic Analysis and Selected Prevention Strategies George A. Pantazopoulos ELKEME Hellenic Research Centre for Metals S.A., 61st km Athens–Lamia National Road, 32011 Oinofyta, Viotias, Greece; [email protected]; Tel.: +30-2262-60-4463 Received: 9 January 2019; Accepted: 27 January 2019; Published: 29 January 2019 Abstract: An insight of the dominant fracture mechanisms occurring in mechanical metallic components during industrial service conditions is offered through this short overview. Emphasis is given on the phenomenological aspects of fracture and their relationships with the emergent fracture mode(s) with respect to the prevailed operating parameters and loading conditions. This presentation is basically fulfilled by embracing and reviewing industrial case histories addressed from a technical expert viewpoint. The referenced case histories reflected mainly the author’s team expertise in failure analysis investigation. As a secondary perspective of the current study, selected failure investigation and prevention methodological approaches are briefly summarized and discussed, aiming to provide a holistic overview of the specific frameworks and systems in place, which could assist the organization of risk minimization and quality enhancement. Keywords: metal components; fracture mechanisms; fractography; fracture mechanics; quality improvement 1. Introduction Failure analysis (FA) is a multidisciplinary, multifaceted scientific field, connecting areas of engineering from diverse backgrounds and bodies of knowledge; from applied mechanics to electrochemistry and corrosion and from numerical modeling, to the understanding of surface science and tribology. The complexity of the nature of the subject requires the embracing of various engineering disciplines, to succeed high process performance and effective root-cause analysis, which is the core and the central objective of the failure investigation process [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Failure Analysis
    © 2005 ASM International. All Rights Reserved. www.asminternational.org Failure Analysis of Engineering Structures: Methodology and Case Histories (#05127G) CHAPTER 7 Forensic Failure Analysis FORENSIC SCIENCE refers to that part of science that is used is a written warranty or contract about its performance. The second in courts of law for administration of justice. Service failures of aspect of the contract that is implied is that the product should be machines and accidents to engineering structures result in serious, reasonably safe. Failure to perform its intended function satisfac- expensive, and prolonged litigations, affecting the credibility of torily and safely constitutes a breach of warranty and, hence, lia- the manufacturer and the reliability of its products. When defective bility. In courts of law, product liability is extended not only to the consumer products fail to perform their intended functions and manufacturer of the whole product but also to the designer, the thereby cause injuries to personnel or damage to property, the user maker of component parts, the assembler, the person who installs resorts to product liability litigations. Litigations also follow when it, the repairer, and also the distributor and the retail seller. The damages to structures, life, and property are caused by deliberate absence of privity of contract, i.e., direct connection between the acts of sabotage by antisocial elements. plaintiff and the defendant, does not preclude liability in tort. Thus, Investigations of such mishaps are of two kinds, preventive and in a product liability litigation, liability is imposed also on people punitive, i.e., inquisitorial and accusatorial. In the former, attempts behind the scenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of SEM in the Study of Fractography: Camshaft Failure
    2246 Microsc. Microanal. 24 (Suppl 1), 2018 doi:10.1017/S1431927618011716 © Microscopy Society of America 2018 Importance of SEM in the Study of Fractography, Camshaft Failure González-Mancera G.1 and González-González D. E.1 1. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Química. Departamento de Ing. Metalúrgica, Ciudad Universitaria, D. F. México. A camshaft is an important automotive part that automates car engine combustion. Most camshafts are made of cast irons to achieve large volume productions and others using CNC machining of steel to achieve a high-quality product but low volume production. In material science and engineering, fractography is one of the most relevant methods used in failure analysis and fracture mechanics. This technique is used to determine the cause of failure by examining the fracture surface. The fracture surfaces can be classified as ductile or brittle depending on the characteristics. In Ductile fracture present mostly, plastic deformation in the surroundings and a bright granular o fibrous surface. In the other hand, brittle fracture presents large crack propagation without plastic deformation and an opaque irregular surface. The current work examines the fracture of a camshaft using fractography. The sample was cleaned with water-based, organic solvent and acetic acid in ultrasonic baths to eliminate possible contamination and atmospheric oxidation. After the sample was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) observation, it shown this material is a nodular cast iron. At low magnification the characteristic fracture pattern indicates a torsion stress failure [1, 2]. It was observed v-shaped cracks known as Chevron marks and they converge in the fracture initial zone.
    [Show full text]
  • GRADUATE CERTIFICATE in FORENSIC ENGINEERING Course Requirements (15 Hours)
    GRADUATE CERTIFICATE IN FORENSIC ENGINEERING Course Requirements (15 hours) Eligibility: • Current Masters or PhD student in Engineering OR; Current JD student pursuing the JD/M.Eng. program; OR a student holding a graduate level degree from an accredited institution. • Minimum GPA of 3.0 Background: The Graduate Forensic Engineering Certificate is designed to be a flexible plan that allows students the opportunity to study engineering and its effect on product safety, welfare, and the laws governing the practice of engineering in society. Students are encouraged to develop a study plan in particular areas of interest and to communicate regularly with program advisor. Students must complete 6 hours of required courses as well as 6 hours of engineering courses from an approved list engineering elective courses. In addition to the 12 hours of coursework, an independent final study project must be developed, approved and completed (3 hours). The independent study project must include a real-world forensic engineering investigation including submission of a technical report and an oral presentation to the program advisor (Dr. Rasty). Required Courses: ME 6330 Advanced Topics in Mechanical Engineering: “Legal Aspects of Forensic Science & Engineering” ME5342 Fracture & Failure Analysis ME 6331 Theoretical Studies (Capstone Project) Three courses or six hours of engineering elective credits from the following list: Course Title Course Title ME 5327 Advanced Heat Transfer IE 5307 Loss Assessment and ME 5339 Transmission Electron Control Microscopy
    [Show full text]
  • Sulfone-Polymers-Fractography-Analysis EN
    Using Fractography to Investigate Causes of Material Failure in Sulfone Polymers Authored by Philippe Martin Fractography is defined as the study of the fractured Fractography methods surfaces of materials. It is routinely used to determine Initial fractographic examination is commonly carried the cause of failure in engineering structures by studying out on a macro scale using low power optical microscopy the characteristics of a fractured surface. It can also and oblique lighting techniques to identify the extent be used in a more fundamental manner to develop and of cracking, possible modes and likely origins. Optical evaluate theoretical models of crack growth behavior. microscopy is often sufficient to pinpoint the nature of Fractography can be used as a quick and simple the failure and the causes of crack initiation and growth. procedure to determine the root cause of material In some cases, fractography requires examination at a failure in plastics. Solvay Specialty Polymers has used finer scale. This is usually carried out using a Scanning this technique to study its high-performance plastics, Electron Microscope (SEM) because its resolution is much including its broad range of sulfone polymers: higher than that of an optical microscope. Samples are • Udel® polysulfone (PSU) examined in a partial vacuum and color is absent. • Veradel ® polyethersulfone (PESU) The SEM is especially useful when combined with • Radel® polyphenylsulfone (PPSU) Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), which can be performed in the microscope, enabling very small • Acudel® modified PPSU areas of the sample to be analyzed for their elemental This document summarizes findings from an assortment composition. One disadvantage of the SEM approach of evaluations of Solvay’s sulfone polymers conducted is related to its high resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Fractography
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF FRACTOGRAPHY S. P. Lynch+* and S. Moutsos* *Monash University, Clayton Vic. 3168 Australia, + DSTO, Fishermans Bend, Vic. 3207 Australia ABSTRACT Fracture surfaces have, no doubt, been studied throughout the history of mankind, probably starting with observations on stone-age tools. In the 16-18th centuries, the macroscopic appearance of fracture surfaces was used to assess the quality of metallic materials, with studies by Réaumur in 1722 being the most notable. However, it was not until 1943 that fracture surfaces were first examined at high-magnifications (using optical microscopy up to 1,000x), and that the first attempts were made to examine replicas of fracture surfaces using transmission-electron microscopy (TEM). Early replicas had poor fidelity and resolution, and it was not until 1956 that Crussard et al. pioneered high-resolution TEM fractography using shadowed, direct-carbon replicas. This technique (and its subsequent variations) revolutionised fractography and led to a plethora of studies in the 1960’s and 70’s. It therefore seems appropriate to commemorate the 50th anniversary of high-resolution electron fractography with a review of how it, and subsequent scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other techniques, have led to a better understanding of fracture processes. Such understanding has been invaluable in failure analysis and in developing improved materials. Milestone observations for a number of important modes of fracture in inert environments including cleavage, brittle intergranular fracture,
    [Show full text]