DOCSLIB.ORG

Determination of the Preferred Intervention Point for Rehabilitation Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determination of the Preferred Intervention Point for Rehabilitation Of Roads & Transport Determination of the intervention point for rehabilitation of dense graded asphalt wearing courses – the Western Australian experience Martyn Glover Sponsored by Determination of the intervention point for rehabilitation of dense graded asphalt wearing courses – the Western Australian Experience. Author: Martyn Glover Introduction Perth, Western Australia Isolated City 2,138Km from Adelaide 5,441Km from Rotorua Minimal research but good data MRWA is central repository Papers purpose is to present the final findings of a significant study which develops a intervention point and subsequent life cycle for asphalt wear courses in the Perth metropolitan area. Study Area Perth Metropolitan Area Swan Coastal Plain Wanneroo in north to Mandurah in south and Mundaring to the East. Participating Local Governments 30 metropolitan Local Governments were invited to be part of the study. 14 Local Governments provided permission to use their data. Participating Local Governments Divided into three distinctive geological areas: Perth Coastal including Belmont, Cottesloe, Joondalup, Melville, Nedlands, South Perth and Wanneroo. Darling Scarp including Armadale, Gosnells, Kalamunda and Mundaring. Murray Coastal including Mandurah and Rockingham. Collectively the participants have 9,378Km of sealed roads which provides a significant dataset Swan Coastal Plain 30 Km wide strip Cape Naturaliste in the south to North of Perth Indian Ocean to the west and Darling Scarp to the east Predominantly sand Bassendean sand Spearwood sand (Tamala Limestone) Quindalup sand (Safety Bay Sand) Study Data Sets Roman II Road management System utilised by 134 of 140 of Local Governments in WA Data collected includes road lengths, construction dates, resurfacing dates and road condition Provided asset management tool for WA Local Government since the 1970’s Provides for road data as far back as 1914 which was a Macadam pavement in Cottesloe WALGA Report on Local Government Road Assets and Expenditure provides data on road lengths, road condition and annual expenditure ARRB Field Studies between 2003 and 2007 Road Pavements High quality sub-grades Ultra-thin pavements Local Government Guidelines for Subdivisional Development Minimum Standard The Guidelines prescribe the anticipated design life of pavements as follows: Unless specified otherwise by the local government, the permanent deformation of the granular pavement must have a minimum design life of 40 years. Unless specified otherwise by the local government asphalt must have the following minimum design life: open graded asphalt – 10 years; dense graded asphalt 50 millimetres total thickness or less – 20 years fatigue life; and dense graded asphalt greater than 50 millimetres total thickness – 40 years fatigue life. The Guidelines provide three typical pavements ranging from: 250mm to 280mm thick including an asphalt layer between 25mm and 65mm thick overlaying an unbound base of crushed rock and/or crushed limestone between 200mm and 250mm thick. Asphalts In the past all wear courses were 10mm dense grade asphalt at 25mm thick and manufactured with class 170 bitumen More recently use both dense grade or stone mastic asphalts with thicknesses at 30mm up to 40mm Most Local Governments use the IPWEA/AAPA Technical Specification, Tender Form and Schedule for Supply and Laying of Hot Asphalt Road Surfacing Climate Mediterranean Climate promotes longevity of road pavements Temperature Average Max 24.7oC Average Min 12.8oC Seasonal Rainfall Average 734.1mm per annum Average Period of 104.1 days per annum No Freeze/Thaw Climate change By 2100 rainfall decreasing Participating Local Governments’ Road Networks Length of Asphalt Road Totals Group Local Government Sealed Road Area Reseal Percentage Area (m2) (km) (m2) Resealed Swan Coastal Plain City of Belmont 229.28 220890 67350 30.49% Town of Cottesloe 48.47 29120 22780 78.23% City of Joondalup 1009.64 2627560 89785 3.42%* City of Melville 733.65 521344 189480 36.34% City of Nedlands 147.00 131210 173290 132.07% City of South Perth 197.77 193480 38250 19.77% City of Wanneroo 1291.52 1028770 147140 14.30% Murray Coastal Group City of Mandurah 667.16 441322 9140 2.07% City of Rockingham 961.42 895201 46722 5.22% Darling Range Group City of Armadale 683.66 549108 103567 18.86% City of Gosnells 855.05 689125 147564 21.41% Shire of Kalamunda 645.00 209450 100240 47.86% Shire of Mundaring 602.75 129200 122970 95.18% City of Swan 1306.97 691640 139117 20.11% Road Network The older Local Governments (100 years) have statistically resealed most or all of their roads The younger Local Governments have replaced proportionately less There can be anomalies as is the case with the split of Joondalup and Wanneroo The average proportion of reseals across the data set was 16.7% of the road network WALGA Local Government Road Assets and Expenditure reports on the condition rating and expenditures of WA Local Governments on their road networks WALGA Key Financial Indicators Road Condition (Written Down Value/Current Replacement Value) Preservation Performance (Actual Expenditure/Status Quo Cost) Road Condition Indicator =WDV/CRV Road Condition Group Local Government 2000/012001/022002/032003/042004/052005/062006/072007/082008/092009/102010/112011/12Average Swan Coastal Plain City of Belmont 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.69 Town of Cottesloe 0.67 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.65 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.56 0.56 0.64 City of Joondalup 0.79 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.70 0.65 0.65 0.68 0.69 0.75 City of Melville 0.69 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.66 0.56 0.56 0.58 0.58 0.64 City of Nedlands 0.67 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.64 0.64 0.54 0.54 0.63 City of South Perth 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.70 0.70 0.68 City of Wanneroo 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.71 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.75 Averages 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.66 0.68 Murray Coastal GroupCity of Mandurah 0.75 0.64 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.67 0.68 0.77 0.77 0.73 City of Rockingham 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.67 0.82 0.82 0.75 0.75 0.75 Averages 0.75 0.69 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.68 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.74 Darling Range Group City of Armadale 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.74 0.70 City of Gosnells 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.64 0.71 0.71 0.68 0.68 0.69 Shire of Kalamunda 0.71 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.68 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.70 Shire of Mundaring 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.62 0.66 City of Swan 0.71 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.64 0.62 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.68 Averages 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.69 0.69 0.65 0.68 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.69 Road Condition Indicator Highest value is 0.79 at the City of Wanneroo, currently the fastest developing Local Government and consequently the most new roads Lowest value is 0.54 at the City of Nedlands which has some of the oldest pavements in WA Average indicator is around 0.70 which could be utilised as the preferred level for Road Condition in metropolitan Perth Based on the data, the average road condition for the participating LG’s is meeting the proposed level at current intervention levels Preservation Performance = Actual Expenditure/SQC Preservation Performance Group Local Government 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Average Swan Coastal Plain City of Belmont 1.76 1.59 1.29 1.12 1.10 1.23 1.03 0.87 1.27 1.43 1.56 1.62 1.32 Town of Cottesloe 1.66 2.38 2.48 2.26 1.75 1.94 1.64 1.88 1.77 1.73 1.67 1.79 1.91 City of Joondalup 0.91 0.96 0.93 0.90 0.71 0.81 0.49 0.53 0.79 0.81 0.95 1.03 0.82 City of Melville 1.32 2.04 1.04 0.83 0.87 0.88 0.93 0.92 1.02 1.00 1.53 1.28 1.14 City of Nedlands 2.47 2.90 2.16 2.24 2.07 2.04 1.35 1.71 2.19 1.93 2.26 2.13 2.12 City of South Perth 0.32 1.35 1.11 0.88 0.83 0.71 0.91 1.00 1.32 1.24 1.22 1.63 1.04 City of Wanneroo 0.68 0.70 0.66 0.63 0.60 0.44 0.55 0.58 0.48 0.47 0.57 0.49 0.57 Averages 1.30 1.70 1.38 1.27 1.13 1.15 0.99 1.07 1.26 1.23 1.39 1.42 1.28 Murray Coastal Group City of Mandurah 0.81 0.85 0.79 0.78 0.76 0.46 0.46 0.49 0.71 0.77 0.65 0.80 0.69 City of Rockingham 0.65 0.56 0.63 0.65 0.51 0.61 0.78 0.72 0.74 0.54 0.80 1.06 0.69 Averages 0.73 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.64 0.54 0.62 0.61 0.73 0.66 0.73 0.93 0.69 Darling Range Group City of Armadale 1.09 1.26 1.08 1.27 1.16 0.97 1.01 0.85 0.97 0.88 0.52 0.73 0.98 City of Gosnells 0.46 0.85 0.78 0.90 0.57 0.69 0.61 0.58 0.81 0.96 0.91 0.84 0.75 Shire of Kalamunda 0.67 0.71 0.80 0.72 0.72 0.53 0.72 0.83 0.56 0.62 0.60 0.42 0.66 Shire of Mundaring 0.92 1.02 0.88 0.83 0.78 0.65 0.68 0.73 0.91 0.85 0.71 0.87 0.82 City of Swan 0.87 0.72 0.83 0.88 1.07 0.92 1.04 1.02 0.90 0.90 1.05 1.31 0.96 Averages 0.80 0.91 0.87 0.92 0.86 0.75 0.81 0.80 0.83 0.84 0.76 0.83 0.83 Preservation Performance Fully developed Local Governments are required to spend more of their own funds to maintain the road to the required condition The developing Local Governments can spend less because so much of their network is new and funded by developer Actual Expenditure per lane kilometre Expenditure per Lane Km in $,000s (Built up Areas) Group Local Government 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Average Swan Coastal Plain City of Belmont $13,730 $13,165 $10,105 $8,966 $8,933 $11,033 $9,907 $9,240 $10,242 $11,524 $12,019 $13,663 $11,044 Town of Cottesloe $9,715
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attatchment 1- Rivers Regional Subsidiary – Formation
    10.2.4 - attachment 7 OCM - ITEM 14.4 - CEO REPORT Rivers Regional Subsidiary – Formation Next Steps Regulations Attatchment(4) Each participant must publish 1- the business plan on its official website and make copies of the plan available for inspection - Update at its office. (5) Each participant must give local public notice of the proposal to form a regional subsidiary in accordance with a business plan, stating that — (a) submissions about the proposal may be made to the participant before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; and (b) the business plan has been published on its official website and copies of it are available for inspection at its office. (6) After the last day for submissions, each participant must consider any submissions made to the participant. (7) If, having considered any submissions made, the participants decide to proceed with the proposal or with a proposal that does not involve a significant change in what was proposed, the participants may apply to the Minister for approval for the formation of the regional subsidiary, subject to compliance with section 3.70(2). (8) If, having considered any submissions made, the participants decide to proceed with a proposal that involves a significant change in what was proposed, the participants must — (a) prepare a revised business plan; and (b) comply with this regulation in respect of the revised business plan and the new proposal. significant change, in relation to a regional subsidiary’s charter, means — (a) the inclusion of a further participant with the participants that formed the regional subsidiary; or (b) the withdrawal of a participant from the participants that formed the regional subsidiary; or (c) an amendment to the charter relating to the functions of the regional subsidiary.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group Minutes
    Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group Minutes Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries 264 Vincent Street, Leederville Thursday 4 July 2019 – 11am 1.0 WELCOME, ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES 1.1 Welcome Patrick Quigley welcomed attendees to the inaugural meeting of the Metropolitan Area Recreation Advisory Group (MARAG). Patrick advised that the aim of MARAG was to provide leadership, coordination, advocacy and strategic direction relevant to the development and operation of metropolitan sport and recreation facilities, programs, services and projects. 1.2 Attending Patrick Quigley - City of South Perth David Bruce - City of Bayswater Marissa MacDonald - WALGA Jonelle Morley – DLGSC Alyce Atkinson – DLGSC Clayton White - DLGSC Leith Fradd – PLAWA Colby Halpin – City of Armadale Courtney Amlett – Town of Cambridge Dean Burton – City of Cockburn Tim Dayman – Town of Bassendean Salvatore Siciliano – Town of Bassendean Dan Barber – City of Bayswater Rachael Rowcroft – City of Gosnells Shane Fraser – City of Joondalup Stewart Winfield – Shire of Mundaring Amanda Cronin - City of Nedlands Sam Hegney – City of Rockingham Jason Parker- Shire of Serpentine-Jarrahdale Jess Fordham – City of South Perth Julie Rechichi – City of Subiaco Amy Fuller – City of Subiaco Michael Hayes – City of Subiaco Sarah Perkins – City of Swan Sarah Kitis – Town of Victoria Park Wayne Grimes – City of Vincent Sandra Watson – City of Vincent Samantha Culliver – City of Wanneroo Craig Bartlett – City of Wanneroo Wayne Stuart – City of Wanneroo Dan
    [Show full text]
  • Peel Region Mandurah Murray
    PEEL REGION MANDURAH MURRAY One of the fastest growing localities in the nation, the Shire of Murray is located just under an hour from Perth with easy access from the Forrest Highway. The City of Mandurah is a local government authority approximately 74kms south of Perth, serving the needs of Considered the ‘Centre of the Peel Region’, Murray is more than 73,000 residents. Council seeks to enhance the situated alongside the Shires of Serpentine/Jarrahdale, lifestyle, business and tourism opportunities for the people of Boddington, Waroona and the City of Mandurah. Mandurah by offering a diverse range of services and facilities Home to picturesque Dwellingup in the east, Murray also to the community. features the historic town of Pinjarra – first established Mandurah is the capital of the Peel region and considered in 1834, and enticing residential estates throughout the to be the gateway to the South West. locality, from semi rural living in Ravenswood through Council is represented by an elected Mayor and 12 elected to canal side residences in South and North Yunderup. members representing East, North, Coastal and Town Wards. Formal Council meetings are held on the fourth Tuesday of By 2031, the Shire of Murray will be home to over 45,000 each month, and special council meetings are held as required. residents, and the community is expected to evolve with Agendas and reports for committee and council meetings this growth. The Shire of Murray is currently focussing on are available for public inspection on the Friday before the meeting at the Mandurah Councill office, the Mandurah Library, long term planning solutions, to deliver better services Falcon e-Library & Community Centre, On-line.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Statistics 30/09/2020 As At
    Local Government Statistics as at 30/09/2020 001 City of Albany Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Breaksea 4239 15.61% 02 Kalgan 4721 17.39% 03 Vancouver 4727 17.41% 04 West 4604 16.96% 05 Frederickstown 4435 16.34% 06 Yakamia 4421 16.29% District Total 27147 100.00% 129 City of Armadale Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Heron 6904 12.31% 02 River 7709 13.75% 03 Ranford 9016 16.08% 04 Minnawarra 7076 12.62% 05 Hills 7917 14.12% 06 Lake 9615 17.15% 07 Palomino 7842 13.98% District Total 56079 100.00% 105 Shire of Ashburton Ward # Electors % Electors 01 Ashburton 44 1.50% 03 Tom Price 1511 51.48% 04 Onslow 398 13.56% 06 Tableland 87 2.96% 07 Paraburdoo 615 20.95% 08 Pannawonica 280 9.54% District Total 2935 100.00% 002 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Augusta-Margaret River 10712 100.00% District Total 10712 100.00% 130 Town of Bassendean Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Bassendean 11119 100.00% District Total 11119 100.00% Page : 1 Local Government Statistics as at 30/09/2020 003 City of Bayswater Ward # Electors % Electors 01 North 12100 25.99% 02 Central 11858 25.47% 03 West 13381 28.74% 04 South 9217 19.80% District Total 46556 100.00% 116 City of Belmont Ward # Electors % Electors 01 West 9588 37.68% 02 South 8348 32.80% 03 East 7513 29.52% District Total 25449 100.00% 004 Shire of Beverley Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Beverley 1317 100.00% District Total 1317 100.00% 005 Shire of Boddington Ward # Electors % Electors 00 Boddington 1179 100.00% District Total 1179 100.00% 007 Shire of Boyup Brook Ward # Electors
    [Show full text]
  • 22 March 2016 Appendices Part 1
    Appendices Council Meeting 22 March 2016 Appendix DEL-1 Peron Naturaliste Partnership – Minutes 26/02/2016 Appendix DEL-2 Peron Naturaliste Partnership – Draft Budget 15/16 and 16/17 Appendix DEL-3 Peron Naturaliste Partnership – Council Contributions Appendix DEL-4 Peron Naturaliste Partnership – Coastal Monitoring Program Implementation Proposal Appendix MTBN-1 Community Access Committee Meeting Minutes 05/02/2016 Appendix CEO-1 Major Projects Report Appendix CEO-2 Schedule of Accounts Paid Appendix CEO-3 Lot 554 Francis - DER Advice Appendix CEO-4 Lot 554 Francis – DCU Advice Appendix CEO-5 February 2016 Budget Review Appendix CEO-6 Statement of Comprehensive Income February 2016 Appendix CEO-7 Statement of Financial Activity February 2016 Appendix CEO-8 Net Current Assets February 2016 Appendix CEO-9 Statement of Financial Position February 2016 Appendix CEO-10 Capital Works Expenditure Summary February 2016 Appendix CEO-11 Operating Project Expenditure Summary February 2016 Appendix DCCS-1 City of Bunbury Life Saving Club – CSRFF Application Appendix DPDRS-1 Lot 121 Strickland Street - Location Plan Appendix DPDRS-2 Lot 121 Strickland Street - Proposed Development Plans Appendix DPDRS-3 Lot 121 Strickland Street - Schedule of Submissions Appendix DPDRS-4 SL 3 Hayward Street – Local Planning Policy Detailed Area Plan City of Bunbury 4 Stephen Street Bunbury WA 6230 Western Australia Correspondence to: Post Office Box 21 Bunbury WA 6231 Telephone: (08) 9792 7000 ◌ Facsimile: (08) 9792 7184 ◌ TTY: (08) 9792 7370 ◌ www.bunbury.wa.gov.au
    [Show full text]
  • CMPAP Past Grant Recipients
    CMPAP past grant recipients Planning region Coastal land manager Project title 2019/20 grant recipients Pilbara Town of Port Hedland Port Hedland Townsite Coastal Reserves Management Plan Mid West City of Greater Geraldton City of Greater Geraldton Coastal Node Master Planning Wheatbelt Shire of Gingin Revision Lancelin – Strategic Town Plan Peel Shire of Waroona Preston Beach Foreshore Management Plan Great Southern City of Albany Emu Beach Foreshore Management Plan 2018/19 grant recipients Environmental and Cultural Heritage Investigations for Cable Beach Kimberley Shire of Broome Foreshore Adaptation Shire of Northampton Horrocks Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Mid West Shire of Irwin Shire of Irwin Coastal Management Plan Mandurah Northern Beaches Coastal Hazard Risk Management City of Mandurah and Adaptation Plan Peel Shire of Murray Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Shire of Murray Plan 2017/18 grant recipients Denham Townsite Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Gascoyne Shire of Shark Bay Adaptation Plan South West City of Busselton City of Busselton Coastal Adaptation Strategy Emu Point to Middleton Beach Coastal Hazard Risk Management Great Southern City of Albany and Adaptation Plan 2016/17 grant recipients Mid West City of Greater Geraldton Geraldton Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan City of Busselton Busselton Coastal Management Program (2018-2028) South West Peron Naturaliste Involving Communities in Developing Coastal Risk Management Partnership Frameworks Shire of Jerramungup
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Ordinary Council Meeting 19 November 2014
    Minutes Ordinary Council Meeting 19 November 2014 Held at the Leeman Recreation Centre Minutes of Ordinary Meeting to be held Wednesday 19 November 2014 Page 1 NOTE: These Minutes are yet to be confirmed DISCLAIMER No responsibility whatsoever is implied or accepted by Shire of Coorow for any act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council/Committee meetings or during formal/informal conversations with Staff. Shire of Coorow disclaims any liability for any loss whatsoever and howsoever caused arising out of reliance by any person or legal entity on any such act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council/Committee meetings or discussions. Any person or legal entity who acts or fails to act in reliance upon any statement does so at that person's or legal entity's own risk. In particular and without derogating in any way from the broad disclaimer above, in any discussion regarding any planning application or application for a licence, any statement or limitation of approval made by a member or officer of Shire of Coorow during the course of any meeting is not intended to be and is not taken as notice of approval from Shire of Coorow. The Shire of Coorow warns that anyone who has an application lodged with Shire of Coorow must obtain and only should rely on WRITTEN CONFIRMATION of the outcome of the application, and any conditions attaching to the decision made by the Shire of Coorow in respect of the application. Signed on behalf of Council Darren Friend Chief Executive Officer Minutes of Ordinary Meeting to be held Wednesday 19 November 2014 Page 2 NOTE: These Minutes are yet to be confirmed SHIRE OF COOROW QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Any member of the public wishing to participate in Public Question Time during Council or Committee meetings is welcome to do so; however, Council requires your name, address and written questions to be provided to the meeting secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Planning Strategy
    Local Planning Strategy nedlands.wa.gov.au www.nedlands.wa.gov.au ADVERTISING The City of Nedlands Local Planning Strategy certified for advertising on / Signed for and on behalf of the Western Australian Planning Commission o v an officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission (pursuant to the Planning and Development Act 2005) Date ti tch QO16 ADOPTED The City of Nediands hereby gclopts the Local Planning Strategy, at the meeting of the Council held on the S*i c te entli day of A- tit 3 LA St 201%, d).'..40 CA MAYOR/SHIRE PRESItJENT CHEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ENDORSEMENT Endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission on an officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission (pursuant to the Planning and Development Act 2005) Date 02G / 0/ 7 DISCLAIMER This document has been published by the City of Nedlands. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the City, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. While the City has tried to ensure the accuracy of the information in this publication, the Publisher accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions or resultant consequences including any loss or damage arising from reliance in information in this publication. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenton Park Rehabilitation Hospital
    DilFHOVEfilEMT FLAM MOn 43 SHEWTON PARK REHABILITATION HOSPITAL Western ^;y\ Australian ^M/f Planning ; ™ Commission WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 2016 Page 1 of 6 IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO. 43 SHENTON PARK REHABILITATION HOSPITAL Introduction 1. Under Section 119 of the Planning and Development Act 2005, the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) is authorised to certify and recommend to the Minister for Planning that an Improvement Plan should be prepared for the purpose of advancing the planning, development and use of any land within the State of Western Australia. 2. The Improvement Plan provisions of the Planning and Development Act 2005 provides for the WAPC, with the approval of the Governor, to; D Plan, replan, design, redesign, consolidate, re-subdivide, clear, develop, reconstruct or rehabilitate land held by it under the Act or enter into agreement with any owner of land not held by it within the Improvement Plan area. ¦ Provide for the land to be used for such purposes as may be appropriate or necessary. H Make necessary changes to land acquired or held by it under the Act. B Manage the tenure or ownership of the land or any improvements to that land held by it under the Act or enter into agreement with other owners of land within the Improvement Plan area for the same purpose. ¦ Enter into agreement for the purpose, surrender, exchange, vesting, allocation or other disposal of land, including the adjustment of boundaries. H Recover costs in implementing the agreement with any owner of land within the Improvement Plan area. b Do any act, matter or thing for the purpose of carrying out any agreement entered into with other land owners.
    [Show full text]
  • WESROC Regional Strategy for Management Of
    Western Suburbs Regional Organisation of Councils Regional Strategy for Management of Stormwater Quality Volume 2 – Figures JDA Consultant Hydrologists May 2002 Western Suburbs Regional Organisation of Councils Regional Strategy for Management of Stormwater Quality CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES 1. LOCATION MAP / STUDY AREA 2. TOPOGRAPHY 3. ANNUAL AND MONTHLY RAINFALL 4. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY MAP 5. MAXIMUM RECORDED GROUNDWATER LEVEL CONTOURS (VIA WRC GROUNDWATER ATLAS) 6. CONSERVATION CATEGORY WETLANDS AND BUSH FOREVER SITES 7. WRC MONITORING SITES 8. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROAD NETWORK 9. TOWN OF CLAREMONT LAND USE 10. TOWN OF CLAREMONT SUB CATCHMENTS 11. TOWN OF CAMBRIDGE LAND USE 12. TOWN OF CAMBRIDGE SUB CATCHMENTS 13. TOWN OF COTTESLOE LAND USE 14. TOWN OF COTTESLOE SUB CATCHMENTS 15. TOWN OF MOSMAN PARK LAND USE 16. TOWN OF MOSMAN PARK SUB CATCHMENTS 17. CITY OF SUBIACO LAND USE 18. CITY OF SUBIACO SUB CATCHMENTS 19. CITY OF NEDLANDS LAND USE 20. CITY OF NEDLANDS SUB CATCHMENTS 21. SHIRE OF PEPPERMINT GROVE LAND USE 22. SHIRE OF PEPPERMINT GROVE SUB CATCHMENTS 23. WESROC DRAINAGE OVERVIEW 24. NUTRIENT INPUT BY TOTAL PHOSPHORUS 25. MAJOR ROADS BY DENSITY 26. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AREAS BY PERCENTAGE 27. LOCAL AUTHORITY PRIORITY SUB CATCHMENTS 28. REGIONAL PRIORITY SUB CATCHMENTS 29. NIDSS MODELLING RESULTS FOR PHOSPHORUS INPUT REDUCTION 30. IMPACT OF EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS ON PHOSPHORUS INPUT REDUCTION May 2002 1 x i rerdsmn vke vke wonger ploret2feh own2of2gmridge gity2feh erry vkes sndin2 gity2of2uio yen uings2rk gity2of2xedlnds vke glremont
    [Show full text]
  • WABN Grants Program: Awarded Projects 2020-21
    * Some totals includes 2021-22 committed funding. Project locations are diagrammatic only. Regional Projects SEE TABLE BELOW FOR DETAILS $200,000 $514,820* $10,000 West Swan Rd Shared Path 3 Projects City of Swan Kimberley Region Whitfords Ave Shared Path Design City of Joondalup Indian Ocean $15,000 Hudson Ave / Girrawheen Ave / Wade Ct Shared Path Design City of Wanneroo $481,158* $20,000 2 Projects Quintilian Rd Shared Path Design Pilbara Region City of Nedlands $10,000 $110,000 $175,000 School Sport Circuit Feasibility High Wycombe Selby Street Shared Path City of Nedlands Connection to and Signals Improvement Forrestfield WESTERN Town of Cambridge Train Station AUSTRALIA $90,750 City of Kalamunda Eucla St to Glendalough Train Station Shared Path $150,000 City of Vincent Brockway Rd Shared Path $238,998* City of Nedlands 4 Projects $317,500* Berkshire Rd / Dundas Rd Mid West Region $335,000 Shared Path $47,500 Cannington to City of Kalamunda $937,437* Jeff Joseph Reserve Willetton Shared Path $18,000 Shared Path Design and Footbridge 14 Projects City of Canning Hale Rd to Dawson Ave Wheatbelt Region City of Melville Cycling Route Design City of Kalamunda SEE METRO MAP $242,500 1 Project Goldfields Esperance Region $67,500 $732,500* $210,000 Murdoch Dr Railway Pde Shared Path 2 Projects Shared Path Design William St to Ladywell St $1,181,885* Great Southern Region City of Melville City of Gosnells 10 Projects $45,000 South West Region The Crescent Shared Path Design [email protected] 16 March 2018; Plan No:9019202
    [Show full text]