CMPAP Past Grant Recipients

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CMPAP Past Grant Recipients CMPAP past grant recipients Planning region Coastal land manager Project title 2019/20 grant recipients Pilbara Town of Port Hedland Port Hedland Townsite Coastal Reserves Management Plan Mid West City of Greater Geraldton City of Greater Geraldton Coastal Node Master Planning Wheatbelt Shire of Gingin Revision Lancelin – Strategic Town Plan Peel Shire of Waroona Preston Beach Foreshore Management Plan Great Southern City of Albany Emu Beach Foreshore Management Plan 2018/19 grant recipients Environmental and Cultural Heritage Investigations for Cable Beach Kimberley Shire of Broome Foreshore Adaptation Shire of Northampton Horrocks Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Mid West Shire of Irwin Shire of Irwin Coastal Management Plan Mandurah Northern Beaches Coastal Hazard Risk Management City of Mandurah and Adaptation Plan Peel Shire of Murray Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Shire of Murray Plan 2017/18 grant recipients Denham Townsite Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Gascoyne Shire of Shark Bay Adaptation Plan South West City of Busselton City of Busselton Coastal Adaptation Strategy Emu Point to Middleton Beach Coastal Hazard Risk Management Great Southern City of Albany and Adaptation Plan 2016/17 grant recipients Mid West City of Greater Geraldton Geraldton Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan City of Busselton Busselton Coastal Management Program (2018-2028) South West Peron Naturaliste Involving Communities in Developing Coastal Risk Management Partnership Frameworks Shire of Jerramungup Review of Coastal Management Plan Great Southern Ocean Beach and Peaceful Bay Coastal Hazard Risk Management Shire of Denmark and Adaptation Plan 2015/16 grant recipients Shire of Derby West Kimberley Derby Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Kimberley Broome Townsite Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Shire of Broome Adaptation Plan Coastal Management Strategy Stakeholder and Community Pilbara City of Karratha Consultation Shire of Gingin Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Wheatbelt Shire of Dandaragan Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan City of Wanneroo Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Perth Metro City of Fremantle and Port, Leighton and Mosman Beach Coastal Hazard Risk Town of Mosman Park Management and Adaptation Plan 2014/15 grant recipients Shire of Chapman Valley Coastal Management Strategy and Action Shire of Chapman Valley Plan Mid West Shire of Irwin Irwin Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan South West City of Busselton Management Plan for Wonnerup coastal reserves Goldfields- Shire of Esperance Shire of Esperance Coastal Hazard Adaptation Strategy Esperance 2013/14 grant recipients Shire of Augusta- Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan Margaret River South West Shire of Harvey Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan .
Recommended publications
  • Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017
    Gascoyne FAST FACTS 2017 Population As illustrated in figure 1, since 2001 the Gascoyne has exhibited significant depopulation, experiencing a net 4.3% decrease. Although there has been notable population growth between the With a population of approximately 10,000 people in 2015, the years 2007 and 2014 (6.1%), the Gascoyne has experienced a Gascoyne has the lowest estimated resident population of all the recent 0.2% population decrease between 2014 and 2015. regions in Western Australia. 10600 7000 10400 6000 10200 5000 10000 9800 4000 9600 3000 2005 9400 9200 2000 2015 9000 Population 1000 8800 Population 0 Carnarvon Exmouth Shark Bay Upper Gascoyne Year Local Government Area Figure 2: Estimated Resident Population for the Gascoyne’s Local Government Figure 1: Estimated Gascoyne Resident Population 2001 – 2015 (source: Australian Areas (source: ABS). Bureau of Statistics (ABS)). Gascoyne Fast Facts 2017 1 Age Structure The Shire of Carnarvon is the most populated of the Gascoyne’s 4 local government areas with a population of just over 6,000 in 2015. 10.00 9.00 As displayed in figure 2, the population in the Shire of Carnarvon has 8.00 remained fairly static between 2005 and 2015. 7.00 6.00 5.00 The greatest local population increase from 2005 to 2015 was 4.00 in the Shire of Exmouth (15.9%). 3.00 The local government area experiencing the greatest 2.00 Population (%) Population 1.00 population decrease from 2005 to 2015 was the Shire of 0.00 Upper Gascoyne (-20.5%). Shark Bay has experienced recent (2014 – 2015) population growth (1.4%), greater than the growth for Western Australia Age Cohort (1.3%) for the same time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation
    Government of Western Australia Department of Environment Regulation NOTIFICATION OF APPLICATIONS RECEIVED FOR CLEARING PERMITS AND AMENDMENTS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS AND/OR REGISTRATIONS OF INTEREST Applications for clearing permits with a 7 day submission period 1. Shire of Quairading, Area Permit, Lot 29205 on Deposited Plan 219610 (Reserve 30628), Quairading, Shire of Quairading, walkway, 0.04ha, (CPS 6838/1) Applications for clearing permits with a 21 day submission period 1. EF Rzemek, Area Permit, Lot 3444 on Deposited Plan 205127, Muckenburra, Shire of Gingin, horticulture, 12ha, (CPS 6815/1) 2. R & R Jordan Pty Ltd ATR R & R Jordan Superannuation Fund, Area Permit, Lot 51 on Plan 10545, Barragup, Shire of Murray, grazing and pasture, 1ha, (CPS 6817) 3. GA and AV Haythornthwaite, Area Permit, Lot 401 on Deposited Plan 137888, Merivale, Shire of Esperance, pasture, 77.038ha, (CPS 6826/1) 4. Shire of Manjimup, Area Permit, Hospital Avenue road reserve (PIN 11422036) and Lot 350 on Deposited Plan 407139, Pemberton, Shire of Manjimup, road construction and fire hazard reduction, 0.149ha, (CPS 6830/1) 5. Kerygma Pty. Ltd, Area Permit, Lot 2656 on Deposited Plan 153480, Yallingup, City of Busselton, existing dam expansion, 0.325ha, (CPS 6839/1) Submissions for applications for clearing permits are to be made within the time frame specified. Submissions may be forwarded to Clearing Regulation, Locked Bag 33, Cloisters Square WA 6850, or email to [email protected]. Further information is available through the website ftp.dec.wa.gov.au/Permit or telephone (08) 9333 7469. NOTIFICATION OF DECISIONS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC APPEAL Clearing permits granted 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCPAC Sub-Committee - Further Consideration of the Wattle Grove Cell 9 Feasibility Study Recommendations
    Ordinary Council Meeting 25 May 2021 Attachments Attachment 10.1.3.4 CSCPAC Sub-committee - Further consideration of the Wattle Grove Cell 9 Feasibility study recommendations. City of Kalamunda 72 Ordinary Council Meeting 25 May 2021 Attachments Attachment 10.1.3.4 Outline • Executive Summary • CCTV – Traditional • CCTV - ANPR • CCTV – Subsidy Scheme • Security Patrols • Physical Security Measures • Mobile CCTV fitted to Community Safety Fleet Vehicles and VMS units • Risk Management • Conclusion • Recommendations • Questions 2 City of Kalamunda 73 Ordinary Council Meeting 25 May 2021 Attachments Attachment 10.1.3.4 Executive Summary • This presentation is an overview of the report to Council regarding the Wattle Grove Cell 9 Feasibility Study and City recommendations. • The feasibility study was presented at the CSCPAC on 10 February 2021. • CSCPAC resolved to form a sub-committee to further address and discuss the security measures within the report. • CSCPAC also requested additional information and cost estimates around installing CCTV on Community safety vehicles. 3 City of Kalamunda 74 Ordinary Council Meeting 25 May 2021 Attachments Attachment 10.1.3.4 Details and AnalysisCCTV - Traditional A review into the placement of traditional CCTV assets, was not considered a viable option. The reasons being; Insufficient value when addressing a cost benefit analysis of standard / traditional CCTV cameras. Minimal return on significant investment. High ongoing maintenance costs. Limited potential for criminal evidence value. Higher City and Police resourcing costs to manage, obtain footage and check/maintain system. Vast majority of movement is vehicular. Preliminary Review: The City agrees with the consultant that the placement of traditional CCTV within Wattle Grove Cell 9 is not a cost effective or viable solution to reduce crime within the area, and therefore recommends that it is not considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Local Governments WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SMALL BUSINESS FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Charter
    DV18.86 - Att 1 of 3 - Small Business Friendly Charter Local Governments WESTERN AUSTRALIAN SMALL BUSINESS FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Charter Commitment to this Charter is a requirement for participation in the Small Business Friendly Local Governments (SBFLG) initiative and outlines what the local government agrees to do to support small business in their area. 1. Commitment to small business The local government agrees to: a) recognise that the small business community is an important stakeholder; b) undertake regular and targeted consultation with this group; b) work towards understanding how its local small business community operates, its needs and goals, and the key challenges; c) provide networking and other development opportunities for its local small business community; and d) actively engage, where appropriate, with the Small Business Development Corporation (SBDC) on matters affecting small business. 2. Commitment to customer service The local government agrees to: a) maintain open lines of communication with small businesses through both formal and informal approaches; b) provide clear advice and guidance to small businesses with a focus on assisting them to understand and meet their regulatory obligations, and to work with them to achieve compliance; c) publish a set of clear service standards setting out what small businesses can expect from them; d) consider the needs of local small business owners for whom English is not a first language; and e) publish a link on its website to take small business owners to resources available on the SBDC website, including the Business Licence Finder. 3. Administration and regulation The local government agrees to: a) take reasonable action to limit unnecessary administrative burdens on small business such as: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Attatchment 1- Rivers Regional Subsidiary – Formation
    10.2.4 - attachment 7 OCM - ITEM 14.4 - CEO REPORT Rivers Regional Subsidiary – Formation Next Steps Regulations Attatchment(4) Each participant must publish 1- the business plan on its official website and make copies of the plan available for inspection - Update at its office. (5) Each participant must give local public notice of the proposal to form a regional subsidiary in accordance with a business plan, stating that — (a) submissions about the proposal may be made to the participant before a day to be specified in the notice, being a day that is not less than 6 weeks after the notice is given; and (b) the business plan has been published on its official website and copies of it are available for inspection at its office. (6) After the last day for submissions, each participant must consider any submissions made to the participant. (7) If, having considered any submissions made, the participants decide to proceed with the proposal or with a proposal that does not involve a significant change in what was proposed, the participants may apply to the Minister for approval for the formation of the regional subsidiary, subject to compliance with section 3.70(2). (8) If, having considered any submissions made, the participants decide to proceed with a proposal that involves a significant change in what was proposed, the participants must — (a) prepare a revised business plan; and (b) comply with this regulation in respect of the revised business plan and the new proposal. significant change, in relation to a regional subsidiary’s charter, means — (a) the inclusion of a further participant with the participants that formed the regional subsidiary; or (b) the withdrawal of a participant from the participants that formed the regional subsidiary; or (c) an amendment to the charter relating to the functions of the regional subsidiary.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Total Fire Ban Declarations Per Fire Season
    NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Christmas Island 2 1 0 0 1 0 City of Albany 2 1 2 3 10 1 City of Armadale 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Bayswater 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Belmont 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Bunbury 7 1 0 2 5 7 City of Busselton 6 1 0 2 5 7 City of Canning 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Cockburn 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Fremantle 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Gosnells 11 4 0 5 17 18 City of Greater Geraldton 4 6 3 14 19 20 City of Joondalup 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Kalamunda 11 4 0 5 18 18 City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder 2 8 10 14 20 9 City of Karratha 1 1 2 7 10 2 City of Kwinana 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Mandurah 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Melville 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Nedlands 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Rockingham 11 1 0 1 7 6 City of South Perth 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Stirling 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Subiaco 10 1 0 1 7 6 City of Swan 11 4 0 5 18 22 City of Vincent 9 1 0 1 7 6 City of Wanneroo 10 1 0 1 8 10 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 2 1 0 0 1 0 Indian Ocean Territories 2 1 0 0 1 0 Shire of Ashburton 1 2 4 11 11 3 Shire of Augusta Margaret River 7 1 0 0 6 3 Shire of Beverley 3 2 1 2 15 14 Shire of Boddington 6 3 1 0 7 11 Shire of Boyup Brook 6 3 0 1 6 7 Shire of Bridgetown- 6 3 0 1 6 7 Greenbushes Shire of Brookton 4 3 1 0 8 15 Shire of Broome 1 0 2 0 9 0 DFES – TOTAL FIRE BANS DECLARED PER YEAR PER LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA Page 1 of 4 NUMBER OF TOTAL FIRE BAN DECLARATIONS PER FIRE SEASON LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 Shire of Broomehill-Tambellup
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Report
    APPENDICES 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 1 – Referendum, Poll and Plebiscite Results Results of referendums, polls and plebiscites are not binding, but do provide an indication of public opinion for the Council to consider when making decisions on issues. Town of Vincent A plebiscite was conducted for the Town of Vincent to decide the method of election of the mayor. Which method of filling the office of mayor do you prefer? Votes Elected by the Electors 5,632 Elected by the Council from amongst the Councillors 582 Total Valid Votes 6,214 Informal 24 Total Votes Received 6,238 The majority of electors voted to elect the office of mayor by the electors. 39 2003 Local Government Postal Elections Election Report Appendix 2 – Reasons for Rejection of Voter Packages Declaration not Declaration District Other Total signed Missing City of Albany 168 17 3 188 City of Armadale 150 33 0 183 Shire of Ashburton 15 9 0 24 Shire of Augusta-Margaret River 39 8 0 47 Town of Bassendean 82 25 3 110 City of Belmont 147 33 4 184 Shire of Bridgetown-Greenbushes 10 4 1 15 City of Bunbury 52 58 2 112 Shire of Busselton 89 27 2 118 Town of Cambridge 114 34 7 155 City of Canning 259 61 2 322 Shire of Capel 34 19 0 53 Shire of Carnarvon 26 7 4 37 Shire of Chittering 7 3 0 10 Town of Claremont 18 2 2 22 City of Cockburn 395 125 4 524 Shire of Collie 62 8 4 74 Town of Cottesloe 36 19 1 56 Shire of Cuballing 6 1 1 8 Shire of Dardanup 0 0 0 0 Shire of Denmark 36 9 1 46 Shire of Donnybrook-Balingup 32 0 0 32 Shire of East Pilbara 16
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly Question on Notice 2361 [Asked Wednesday 29 November 2017] – Part (A)
    Legislative Assembly Question On Notice 2361 [asked Wednesday 29 November 2017] – part (a) Shire Name / Account Name Balance 28 February 2017 Total Drawdowns Shire of Ashburton - ROYALTIES $0.00 -$18,704,321.96 Shire of Ashburton - PARABURDOO $5,041,054.23 $0.00 Shire of Augusta Margaret River - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$5,636,071.12 Shire of Augusta Margaret River - MAIN ST $5,339,085.94 -$200,000.00 Shire of Boddington - SUPERTOWNS $993,294.99 -$1,842,771.80 Shire of Boddington - REC CENTRE $1,082,766.78 -$1,500,000.00 Shire of Broome - CHINA TOWN $9,113,731.87 -$1,980,000.00 City of Bunbury - MARINE $929,184.87 -$100,000.00 City of Bunbury - KOOMBANA $10,687,969.90 -$1,950,000.00 City of Busselton - AIRPORT RED $2,469.49 -$46,033,436.14 City of Busselton - FORESHORE $1,519,677.40 -$2,698,000.00 Shire of Carnarvon -ROYALTIES $0.00 -$44,626,799.36 Shire of Carnarvon - FASCINE COMP $712,750.76 -$3,000,000.00 Shire of Collie - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$11,541,575.47 Shire of Dandaragan - SUPERTOWNS $0.00 -$12,857,201.13 Shire of Dandaragan - SEWAGE $0.00 -$1,072,031.77 Shire of Denmark - PRECINCT $7,014,768.63 $0.00 Shire of Derby West Kimberly - TRANSPORT $0.00 -$2,935,794.52 Shire of Donnybrook-Balingup $0.00 -$1,879,804.28 Shire of East Pilbara - ROYALTIES $0.00 -$21,316,956.82 Shire of Esperance - SUPERTOWNS $112,952.19 -$13,791,906.00 Shire of Exmouth - NINGALOO $6,762,421.87 -$15,400,000.00 Shire of Exmouth - FLOOD MITIGA $10,499.22 -$1,650,000.00 City of Greater Geraldton - BUILDING $0.00 -$5,629,313.85 City of Greater Geraldton - BERESFORD $8,938,801.47
    [Show full text]
  • South West Country Zone Minutes 24 April 2020
    South West Country Zone Minutes 24 April 2020 Minutes South West Country Zone – 24 April 2020 Page 1 Table of Contents 1. OPENING AND WELCOME ..................................................................................... 3 2. ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES ........................................................................... 3 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST ............................................................................. 4 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS ................................................................................................. 4 5. GUEST SPEAKERS / DEPUTATIONS ..................................................................... 5 5.1 Bunbury Geographe Economic Alliance ...................................................................... 5 6. MINUTES .................................................................................................................. 5 6.1 Confirmation of Minutes from the South West Country Zone meeting held Friday 28 February 2020 (Attachment 1) .................................................................................... 5 6.2 Business Arising from the Minutes of the South West Country Zone Meeting Friday 28 February 2020 ............................................................................................................ 5 7. ZONE BUSINESS ..................................................................................................... 6 7.1 Payments to Volunteers Impacted by Emergency Events ........................................... 6 7.2 South West Electoral
    [Show full text]
  • GSDC Bulletin 19
    ISSUE 19 Agencies sign for mutual help Agreement to strengthen GSDC, CRCs A regional meeting of the Board of the Great Southern Development Commission (GSDC) in Borden in May was the setting for a groundbreaking agreement between the Commission and the region’s community resource centres (CRCs). Gnowangerup CRC The Great Southern CRCs, formerly known Chairperson Jill Lesk as telecentres, signed a Memorandum signs the Memorandum of of Understanding with the GSDC setting Understanding, watched by guidelines for the organisations to support CRC regional coordinator each other’s work in the region. Megan Wright and GSDC Chairman Peter Rundle. Community Resource Network Director Debbie Rice said the signing was a momentous occasion. “The memorandum also commits the “It highlights the promotion of the GSDC to refer potential clients for CRC inside this issue: partnership between the GSDC and services to the relevant centre and to the CRCs in the provision of increased consider proposals supporting training and information and services to their local learning opportunities delivered through Borden perspective ..............................2 communities,” Ms Rice said. the centres,” Mr Manning said. Jerramungup joint effort ......................2 “We value the lead set by the GSDC in “In turn, the CRCs have committed to helping instigating this agreement, which shows the GSDC with community engagement at Development Commissions review ....3 a growing connection between the a local level, providing advice on emerging organisations. issues and opportunities and being a New Board member .............................3 shopfront for GSDC information. “Royalties for Regions funding for the CRCs Regional science on stage ..................4 and for projects under the GSDC is helping “This is a mutually beneficial arrangement to build partnerships to strengthen regional for our organisations and it will work to Photo competition ................................4 communities,” Ms Rice said.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Local Government Policy Awards Showcase
    10th Anniversary THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLICY AWARDS Children • Environment • Health 2020 Showcase Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries Images courtesy of PHAIWA. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from PHAIWA. To obtain further copies of this publication you can contact the following: PHAIWA GPO Box U1987 Perth WA 6845 Phone: (08) 9266 2489 Email: [email protected] Web: www.phaiwa.org.au Note the document may be accessed electronically from www.phaiwa.org.au © October 2020 Public Health Advocacy Institute of WA It can be cited as Public Health Advocacy Institute of Western Australia (2020). 10th Anniversary - The Local Government Policy Awards Children Environment Health 2020 Showcase. Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia. Acknowledgements PHAIWA would like to thank The Minister for Local Government; Heritage; Culture and the Arts, Healthway, the WA Local Government Association, the Commissioner for Children and Young People WA and Cancer Council WA for their support and financial contributions towards the development and implementation of the Local Government Policy Awards. PHAIWA would like to make a special acknowledgment to Healthway for their 10 years of continued support of the project. Thank you to the Local Government’s City of Mandurah, Shire of Harvey, City of Kalamunda and Shire of Kondinin who have provided the cover images. Finally, PHAIWA would like to sincerely
    [Show full text]
  • Peel Region Mandurah Murray
    PEEL REGION MANDURAH MURRAY One of the fastest growing localities in the nation, the Shire of Murray is located just under an hour from Perth with easy access from the Forrest Highway. The City of Mandurah is a local government authority approximately 74kms south of Perth, serving the needs of Considered the ‘Centre of the Peel Region’, Murray is more than 73,000 residents. Council seeks to enhance the situated alongside the Shires of Serpentine/Jarrahdale, lifestyle, business and tourism opportunities for the people of Boddington, Waroona and the City of Mandurah. Mandurah by offering a diverse range of services and facilities Home to picturesque Dwellingup in the east, Murray also to the community. features the historic town of Pinjarra – first established Mandurah is the capital of the Peel region and considered in 1834, and enticing residential estates throughout the to be the gateway to the South West. locality, from semi rural living in Ravenswood through Council is represented by an elected Mayor and 12 elected to canal side residences in South and North Yunderup. members representing East, North, Coastal and Town Wards. Formal Council meetings are held on the fourth Tuesday of By 2031, the Shire of Murray will be home to over 45,000 each month, and special council meetings are held as required. residents, and the community is expected to evolve with Agendas and reports for committee and council meetings this growth. The Shire of Murray is currently focussing on are available for public inspection on the Friday before the meeting at the Mandurah Councill office, the Mandurah Library, long term planning solutions, to deliver better services Falcon e-Library & Community Centre, On-line.
    [Show full text]