DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Strategies to Build a More Inclusive Economy with Cooperatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Strategies to Build a More Inclusive Economy with Cooperatives POWER IN PURPOSE POLICY STRATEGIES TO BUILD A MORE INCLUSIVE ECONOMY WITH COOPERATIVES BRETT THEODOS, LEIHA EDMONDS, AND CORIANNE PAYTON SCALLY A REPORT FROM THE URBAN INSTITUTE OCTOBER 2020 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Brett Theodos is senior fellow in the Leiha Edmonds is a research analyst in the Metropolitan Housing and Communities Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center at the Urban Institute, where Policy Center. he directs the Community Economic Development Hub. Corianne Payton Scally is a senior research associate in the Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was funded by Cooperative Office of Economic Development and Development Foundation in partnership International Trade; Jason Linde, National with the National Cooperative Business Rural Electric Cooperative Association; Association CLUSA International, with Margaret Lund, independent consultant; original funding from the Robert Wood Mo Manklang, US Federation of Worker Johnson Foundation. We are grateful to Cooperatives; Tim Palmer, Democracy them and to all our funders, who make it at Work Institute; Linda Phillips, Jason possible for Urban to advance its mission. Wiener|p.c.; Mary Ann Ralls, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association; The views expressed are those of the Stuart Reid, Food Co-op Initiative; Nathan authors and should not be attributed Schneider, University of Colorado Boulder; to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or Stacey Sutton, University of Illinois at its funders. Funders do not determine Chicago; Todd Van Hoose, Farm Credit research findings or the insights and Council; and Russell Wasson, National recommendations of Urban experts. Rural Electric Cooperative Association. Further information on the Urban Institute’s funding principles is available at We are also grateful to the people who urban.org/fundingprinciples. participated in the Power in Purpose: Cooperative Policy Roundtable Series We would like to thank the people who roundtables held in Billings, Montana; participated in phone interviews for Denver, Colorado; Harrisburg, this project: Larry Blanchard, CUNA Pennsylvania; Maple Grove, Minnesota; Mutual Group; Rob Brown, Cooperative Madison, Wisconsin; Sacramento, Development Institute; Victoria Clark, California; and Olympia, Washington, and Northcountry Cooperative Foundation; to those who participated in the regional Brian Cavey, CoBank; David Hammer, virtual roundtables in New England and ICA Group; Melissa Hoover, Democracy the Southeast. at Work Institute; John Kovacs, Colorado On the cover: Cooperators discuss strategies to build an enabling environment at the 2019 Cooperative IMPACT Conference just outside Washington, DC. Photo: NCBA CLUSA Copyright © September 2020. Urban Institute. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute. POWER IN PURPOSE POLICY STRATEGIES CONTENTS TO BUILD A 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 POLICY STRATEGIES TO BUILD A MORE INCLUSIVE MORE INCLUSIVE ECONOMY WITH COOPERATIVES ECONOMY WITH 5 The Cooperative Approach 6 Challenges to Launching, Sustaining, COOPERATIVES and Expanding Cooperatives 8 COOPERATIVE POLICY GOALS 9 COOPERATIVE POLICY OBJECTIVES 10 Policies that Directly Affect Members, Communities, and Customers 11 Enabling Legislation, Improving Incorporation and Chartering 12 Eligibility and Regulation 13 Financial Support BRETT THEODOS, LEIHA EDMONDS, AND 13 Grants CORIANNE PAYTON SCALLY 13 Loans and Guarantees A REPORT FROM THE 15 Taxes URBAN INSTITUTE 15 Technical Assistance and Training 16 Preferences in Contracting and OCTOBER 2020 Procurement 17 CONCLUSION 19 Notes 20 References CO-OP POLICY STRATEGIES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this report, we provide an Major 20th-century federal policy initiatives enabled U.S. communities historically excluded overview of the role cooperatives from resources and services to use cooperatives to can play in building healthy, band together and create new opportunities. From equitable, and sustainable bringing electricity to rural America to accessing communities, and explain how to financing and credit services for people with low incomes, cooperatives have addressed significant advance that work through federal, market failures and offer an inclusive model of state, and local policy. The policy employment and business ownership. For more objectives we present are intended people to have the ability to improve their health and wellness, they need good jobs, stable housing, not to simply grow the field of and access to critical resources. Equally important cooperatives, but to enhance the is an empowering environment that provides work of cooperatives that address community members opportunities to develop and exercise leadership skills to influence policies economic and racial disparities in that impact their lives, families and neighborhood. the United States. Today, cooperatives with engaged memberships Photo: Sam Levitan A policy discussion at the 2019 Cooperative IMPACT Conference. 2 POWER IN PURPOSE that aspire to cooperative principles offer cooperatives that provide resources to people solutions to some of the country’s biggest issues. and communities who are underserved by For example, cooperatives help renters purchase mainstream institutions and businesses. homes, help people set up checking accounts or take out loans, help families access affordable child Moreover, the six specific areas where policy can care, help older adults find reliable home care, and help cooperatives build an inclusive economy are help people access fresh food. as follows: n Moreover, crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and POLICIES DIRECTLY AFFECTING COMMUNITIES the ongoing violence of racism harm communities OR CUSTOMERS. Policymakers can improve of color, which are experiencing higher rates of policies for communities and customers, thereby death due to the coronavirus, higher mortality supporting cooperatives’ inclusive-growth work. rates during police encounters, and higher Such policies can involve consumer finance, child unemployment rates. As policymakers consider care, food access, and affordable housing. how to help their communities recover from these n ENABLING LEGISLATION. States can adopt general crises, new initiatives are critically important. incorporation statutes to provide a more inclusive Cooperatives offer a business model informed framework enabling cooperatives of all types to by the needs of workers and their communities, form and operate effectively in their state of origin. and they are striving to mitigate layoffs, protect n ELIGIBILITY AND REGULATION. Agencies can the health of workers and clients, and support the expand programs (such as the Community struggle for racial justice. Development Block Grant) or adjust regulations (such as the Workforce Innovation and Cooperatives are part of the solution to such Opportunity Act) to better include cooperatives. problems, but federal, state, and local government policies are needed to help cooperatives operate n FINANCIAL SUPPORT. Cooperatives can advocate at their full potential. In this report, we describe for dedicated local and state government funding four broad policy goals and six specific policy as well as tax credits and other subsidies to objectives that policymakers can use to improve support employee ownership and the conversion how cooperatives serve their communities. The four of businesses to worker cooperatives. near-term policy goals are as follows: n TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING. Congress can enhance funding for technical n LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD. Cooperative sectors assistance and training via the U.S. Department can be disadvantaged by federal, state, and of Agriculture’s Rural Cooperative Development local policy. Grants (RCDGs) and Small Business n HELP GROW THE NUMBER OF COOPERATIVES Development Centers. IN UNDERSERVED MARKETS. Policy can do this n PREFERENCES IN CONTRACTING AND by helping new cooperative businesses start up, PROCUREMENT. Policymakers can encourage converting existing businesses into cooperatives, preferential procurement and contracting processes preventing cooperatives from demutualizing for cooperatives with clear social mandates. by selling the cooperative to investors, and preventing cooperatives from failing. n HELP GROW THE SIZE AND MARKET SHARE OF EXISTING COOPERATIVES. Cooperatives benefit from increased employment (or membership) and higher revenues or profitability. n SUPPORT AND INCENTIVIZE COOPERATIVES TO REACH UNDERSERVED PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES. Policy supports should target CO-OP POLICY STRATEGIES 3 POLICY STRATEGIES TO BUILD 500 L’Enfant Plaza SW A MORE INCLUSIVE ECONOMY Washington, DC 20024 www.urban.org WITH COOPERATIVES The impact of COVID-19 threatens the resilience communities. Cooperatives operate in a policy of workers, businesses, and communities with environment designed primarily to address staggering job losses and untold local-business the needs of investor-owned corporations and failures. As the pandemic ripples through individual proprietors. Though most cooperatives the economy, people of color, workers with are corporations, the cooperative ownership low incomes, and business owners are being model means that policies and regulations, if not disproportionately affected. To address these well crafted, can unintentionally create barriers problems, federal, state, and local policymakers that exclude cooperatives or make eligibility and working to make their communities healthier compliance complicated and costly. and more inclusive and resilient
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HISTORY and DEVELOPMENT of AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES in OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements F
    HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES IN OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By WILLIAM TAFT RICHIE, B. S., M. S. The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by: Adviser Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to all the people who have helped to make this manuscript possible. A special word of appre­ ciation goes to Dr. George P. Henning, of the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, for his guidance and supervision. I also wish to thank Dr. Ralph W. Sherman and Dr. Virgil R. Wertz for their suggestions and assistance. My wife, Sadie, has been a source of inestimable help and encouragement at all times. To her I am indebted for the typing of this manuscript. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION................................. 1 Purpose and Scope of Study.............. Previous Studies........ 6 Source of Data ..................... 8 II. ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS OF COOPERATIVES................................ 10 III. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIONS.............. lk- IV. DEVELOPMENT OF FARMER COOPERATIVES IN OHIO.. 21 Ohio Farmers Late in Organizing Cooperatives............................. 22 Farm Organizations............ 26 Number, Membership and Volume of Business................................. 39 V. DAIRY COOPERATIVES............... 57 Early Developments.......... 57 Some Factors Affecting Development and Growth................................... 61 Background Information of Some of the Associations Operating in Ohio Milksheds. 67 Ohio Milk Producers Federation.......... 82 Statistics and Trends in Dairy Coopera­ tives.................................... 82 VI. FRUIT AND VEGETABLE COOPERATIVES............ 89 Development of Fruit Cooperatives in Ohio..................................... 90 Development of Vegetable Cooperatives.... 92 Statistics and Trends...................
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Housing in the United States
    HOUSING COOPERATIVES UNITED STATES 1949-1950 Joint publication of Division of Housing Research Housing HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY Research Bureau of Labor Statistics UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WASHINGTON 1951 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Cooperative Housing in the United States 1949 and 1950 Housing Research Paper No. 24 Bulletin No. 1093 HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Administrator Bureau of Labor Statistics Housing Research Division For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U . S. Government Printing: Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price 65 cents (paper) Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P r e f a c e After the end of World W ar II the severe housing shortage in this country led to an increased interest in cooperative housing as one means of solving the problem. This gave further impetus to a movement which began in the United States about a third of a century ago among people who held that by joining together in the purchase of land and the construction of houses they could obtain dwellings of good quality at less cost than those being provided in other ways. As things have worked out, some housing cooperatives have been outstandingly successful and have accomplished everything their sponsors hoped for. Others, however, have proved to be disap­ pointing, either falling by the wayside or failing to attain the original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Models, work and employment, ecosystem and public policies International Cooperative Alliance Asia and Pacific & 9, Aradhana Enclave +91-11-26888067 ica-asia and pacific Sector-13, R. K. Puram International Organisation of the Industrial and Service Cooperatives New Delhi-110066 +91-11-26888250 icaapac [email protected] icaasiapacific ica-ap.coop Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Table of contents List of tables iv List of figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iv Abbreviations and acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Synthesis note 1 Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2 The scope of target types of the present study ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 3 Method����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2 ‘Type’ and ‘model’�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives
    USDA Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: United States Department of Agriculture The Story of the Capper- Rural Business- Volstead Act Cooperative Service Cooperative Information Report 59 Abstract The Capper-Volstead Act provides a limited exemption from antitrust liability for agricultural producers who market the products they produce on a cooperative basis. Without Capper-Volstead, farmers who agree among themselves on the pric es they'll accept for their products and other terms of trade would risk being held in violation of antitrust law. Even with the exemption, agricultural producers are not free to unduly enhance the prices they charge, consolidate with or collaborate in anticompetitive conduct with nonproducers, or engage in conduct with no legitimate business purpose that is intended to reduce competition. Keywords: cooperative, antitrust, Capper-Volstead Act, law ________________________________________ Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: The Story of the Capper-Volstead Act Donald A. Frederick Program Leader Law, Policy & Governance Rural Business-Cooperative Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative Information Report 59 September 2002 RBS publications and information are available on the Internet. The RBS w eb site is: http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs Preface Antitrust law poses a special challenge to agricultural marketing associations. Certain conduct by independent business people-- agreeing on prices, terms of sale, and whom to sell to--violates the Sherman Act and other antitrust statutes. And these are the very types of collaborative activities that agricultural producers conduct through their marketing cooperatives. Since 1922, the Capper-Volstead Act has provided a limited antitrust exemption for agricultural marketing associations. Producers, through qualifying associations, can agree on prices and other terms of sale, select the extent of their joint marketing activity, agree on common marketing practices with other cooperatives, and achieve substantial market share and influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Housing Cooperatives
    C O O P ! S E R V A T I O N S Group Housing Cooperatives: !e Expanding Alternative to Meet New Needs in a Changing Society By Jim Jones In recent years, the cost of housing has instantly bring a new member into a ready-made increased much more rapidly than average salaries. social group. While housing has always been problem for low Because young people seldom plan to stay in jobs income wage earners (including students who don’t for more than a few years, equity accumulation in have wealthy parents), it is becoming an increasing housing is rarely a concern. Renting is the realistic problem for young professionals. For many with alternative, and the control that comes through college degrees, entry level salaries just don’t go group ownership is seen as a value to those who Ideas and opinions as far as they used to – particularly after making have spent years suffering under landlords or in on cooperative student loan payments. university residence halls. housing Many in this group are single, unsure of what Even though the privacy of a room is important, they want to do and where they want to do it, highly the space of an entire apartment is generally not mobile, and in many ways lifestyles are still similar as important. Young, single people have fewer to those of students. Graduation from college can possessions and less need for space than those with also mean the stress of a new job in a new city far spouses, children and years of accumulated “stuff.” from friends and familiar surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Day in the Life of Cooperative America
    A DAY IN THE LIFE OF COOPERATIVE AMERICA A Project of the National Co-op Month Committee COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES Cooperatives follow seven internationally recognized principles as adopted in 1995 by the International Cooperative Alliance. The National Cooperative Business Association lists these as: 1. Voluntary and Open Membership Cooperatives are voluntary organizations, open to all persons able to use their services and willing to accept the responsibilities of membership, without gender, social, racial, political or religious discrimination. 2. Democratic Member Control Cooperatives are democratic organizations controlled by their members, who actively participate in setting their policies and making decisions. Men and women serving as elected representatives are accountable to the membership. In primary cooperatives, members have equal voting rights (one member, one vote) and cooperatives at other levels are organized in a democratic manner. 3. Member Economic Participation Members contribute equitably to, and democratically control, the capital of their cooperative. At least part of that capital is usually the common property of the cooperative. They usually receive limited compensation, if any, on capital subscribed as a condition of membership. Members allocate surpluses for any or all of the following purposes: developing the cooperative, possibly by setting up reserves, part of which at least would be indivisible; benefiting members in proportion to their transactions with the cooperative; and supporting other activities approved by the membership. 4. Autonomy and Independence Cooperatives are autonomous, self-help organizations controlled by their members. If they enter into agreements with other organizations, including governments, or raise capital from external sources, they do so on terms that ensure democratic control by their members and maintain their cooperative autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Housing Bulletin
    COOPERATIVE HOUSING BULLETIN A member service of the National Association of Housing Cooperatives August/September 2008 National Affordable Housing Initiative Launched ROC USA Rolls Out Resident Ownership in owned communities. Join Us for Manufactured-Home Communities in 29 States In New NAHC’s Annual CFED, Fannie Mae, Ford Foundation, NCB Capital Hampshire, the Loan Fund has helped Conference > Impact, New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Invest $7 Million in new organization homeowners in Houston, TX 84 communities Concord, NH – The New Hampshire Community Sept. 17–20, 2008 Loan Fund (the Loan Fund), the Corporation for establish their own Enterprise Development (CFED) corporations to inside and NCB Capital Impact launched purchase and manage a new organization, ROC USA in the community. May of 2008. Beyond New Hampshire, Jerry Voorhis hundreds of cooperatives made Legacy ROC USA aims to help the 3.5 million American families living in up of owners of mobile and 3 manufactured-home communities manufactured homes have bought acquire the communities in which communities — in California, they live. ROC USA’s mission is to Florida and states in between. Members News make resident ownership a viable However, there has never been a 5 choice for homeowners in the U.S. standardized model or a coordinated strategy, so Those are the headlines. Now, how is ROC USA successes have been localized and dispersed. ROC USA aims to move resident ownership to scale. “We FCH-Assisted Co-ops LLC planning to fulfill its mission? By following achieve scale when every homeowner in every U.S. in Puerto Rico what the Loan Fund has been doing since 1984 in New Hampshire — help “homeowners” in “parks” community is presented with a viable choice as to 7 buy their communities, when they become available.
    [Show full text]
  • For All the People
    Praise for For All the People John Curl has been around the block when it comes to knowing work- ers’ cooperatives. He has been a worker owner. He has argued theory and practice, inside the firms where his labor counts for something more than token control and within the determined, but still small uni- verse where labor rents capital, using it as it sees fit and profitable. So his book, For All the People: The Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, reached expectant hands, and an open mind when it arrived in Asheville, NC. Am I disappointed? No, not in the least. Curl blends the three strands of his historical narrative with aplomb, he has, after all, been researching, writing, revising, and editing the text for a spell. Further, I am certain he has been responding to editors and publishers asking this or that. He may have tired, but he did not give up, much inspired, I am certain, by the determination of the women and men he brings to life. Each of his subtitles could have been a book, and has been written about by authors with as many points of ideological view as their titles. Curl sticks pretty close to the narrative line written by worker own- ers, no matter if they came to work every day with a socialist, laborist, anti-Marxist grudge or not. Often in the past, as with today’s worker owners, their firm fails, a dream to manage capital kaput. Yet today, as yesterday, the democratic ideals of hundreds of worker owners support vibrantly profitable businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization and Management of Cooperative and Mutual Housing Associations
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR L. B. Schwellenbach, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS A . F. Hinrichs, Acting Commissioner Organization and Management of Cooperative and Mutual Housing Associations Bulletin No. 858 (Revision of Bulletin No. 608) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 20 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Letter of Transmittal U nited S tates D epartm ent of L abor, B ureau of L abor Statistics, Washington, February h 1946. T h e Secretary of L abo r: I have the honor to transmit herewith a pamphlet setting forth the proper methods of procedure for the organization and management of cooperative and mutual housing associations. The present report is a revision of the Bureau’s Bulletin No. 608, bringing the subject matter into conformity with present practice. Many persons within and without the cooperative movement, qualified by experience and training, have contributed to this manual. Their number includes housing experts, architects, and attorneys, as well as cooperators who have participated in one or more housing projects. In addition to Florence E. Parker and Alexander Findlay of its own staff, the Bureau wishes especially to acknowledge the valuable contributions and suggestions of Dale Johnson, Huson Jackson, Dorothy Kenyon, and Udo Rail. A . F . H in r ic h s, Acting Commissioner. H on. L . B . SCHWELLENBACH, Secretary of Labor. iii Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Cooperative Enterprise As an Antimonopoly Strategy
    ART 1 - COOPERATIVE ENTERPRISE (DO NOT DELETE) 10/22/2019 4:02 PM Articles Cooperative Enterprise as an Antimonopoly Strategy Sandeep Vaheesan* & Nathan Schneider† ABSTRACT After decades of neglect, antitrust is once again a topic of public debate. Proponents of reviving antitrust have called for abandoning the narrow consumer welfare objective and embracing a broader set of objectives. One essential element that has been overlooked thus far is the ownership structure of the firm itself. The dominant model of investor- owned business and associated philosophy of shareholder wealth maximization exacerbate the pernicious effects of market power. In contrast, cooperative ownership models can mitigate the effects of monopoly and oligopoly, as well as advance the interests of consumers, workers, small business owners, and citizens. The promotion of fair competition among large firms should be paired with support for democratic cooperation within firms. Antitrust law has had a complicated history and relationship with cooperative enterprise. Corporations threatened by cooperatives have used the antitrust laws to frustrate the growth of these alternative businesses. To *Legal Director, Open Markets Institute. †Assistant Professor, Department of Media Studies, University of Colorado Boulder. The authors thank Lauren Bridges, Michelle Meagher, Sanjukta Paul, and Ganesh Sitaraman for thoughtful feedback on earlier drafts of this Article. 1 ART 1 - COOPERATIVE ENTERPRISE (DO NOT DELETE) 10/22/2019 4:02 PM 2 PENN STATE LAW REVIEW [Vol. 124:1 insulate cooperatives from the antitrust threat, Congress has enacted exemptions to protect cooperative entities, notably a general immunity for farm cooperatives in the 1922 Capper-Volstead Act. As part of an agenda to tame corporate monopoly, all three branches of the federal government and the states should revisit these ideas and seek to protect and enable the cooperative model across the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting Inequality Through Employee Ownership
    COMBATTING INEQUALITY THROUGH EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP Worker Cooperatives and Employee Stock Ownership Programs in Buffalo-Niagara Kristin Ksiazek and Annabel Bacon Introduction Communities across the United States are grappling with income inequality. Since 1979, earnings of the top one percent of Americans have risen by a staggering 157%, compared to an increase of just 22.2% for the bottom 90% of workers.1 Today, 44 percent of American workers earn less than $18,000 per year, while the CEOs of the largest 350 companies earn, on average, $18.9 million per year.2 From 1978 to 2018, compensation for CEOs grew 940.3%, but wages for typical, nonsupervisory workers grew by just 11.9%.3 Wealth gaps between the most privileged and marginalized social and demographic groups have widened by even larger amounts—to the point where, in 2015, for every dollar in wealth owned by white households, black and Latinx households held just six and eight cents, respectively; and women owned only 32 cents for every dollar held by men.4 Equally as troubling, present generations are far less likely than their parents and grandparents to experience upward economic mobility,5 and they are burdened by much more student debt.6 Job seekers of all educational backgrounds are faced with fewer choices in the American labor market, where much of the recent job growth has come in the form of low-wage work.7 This trend means that low income workers do not have the option to simply “find better paying jobs.” Rather, the data show that “there are not enough living wage jobs to go around.”8 The lack of living-wage jobs disproportionately affects women and workers of color.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Education Inventory Study
    Cooperative Education Inventory Study By Eklou Amendah & Christina Clamp Center for Co-operatives & CED Southern New Hampshire University February 2014 Prepared for The Cooperative Foundation Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Literature: Assessing the need for cooperative education ....................................................................... 6 III. Overview of Co-op Education Organizational Settings ............................................................................ 8 IV. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 10 V. Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 VI. Discussion of the Results ....................................................................................................................... 19 VII. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 24 1. Limitations ....................................................................................................................................... 25 2. Future research ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]