DOCSLIB.ORG

Strike Command Steps up F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strike Command Steps up F Photo by Sagar Pathak Strike Command Steps Up The legendary SAC is the benchmark for the Air Force’s new nuclear deterrent force. By Adam J. Hebert, Executive Editor That didn’t carry on in the post- SAC years, and, as a result, the ser- vice committed a number of serious arms-related blunders. “The focus on existing standards had atrophied over the years,” said Brig. Gen. Everett H. Thomas, commander of the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center at Kirtland AFB, N.M. Beginning in 1992, the nuclear mis- sion was divided between Air Combat Command and Air Force Space Com- mand. In many ways, it became sec- ondary in competitions for attention, Cold War, however, USAF’s nuclear resources, and prestige. element slowly drifted away from that Now, the SAC outlook is coming exacting standard. back—because that’s the way things It was a mistake, as everyone now will need to be when dealing with the readily, almost compulsively, concede. most powerful weapons on Earth. The That certainly goes for Lt. Gen. Frank creation of Global Strike Command, G. Klotz, the officer chosen to head with a singular focus on the nuclear or nearly 50 years, Strategic Air USAF’s new Global Strike Command. enterprise, is designed to underline Command maintained an unspar- “If there is one unchanging, immu- that. “It became clear” that nuclear ing, no-nonsense operational cul- table truth” about the nuclear arsenal, and conventional missions were “out Fture. After the Air Force disestablished said Klotz, “it is that it demands constant of balance,” Klotz said. Strike Com- the legendary SAC at the end of the and undivided attention.” mand is to put them back into balance. 26 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2010 Photo by Ted Carlson Left, a B-2 stealth bomber on a train- tenance—all said they see the new focus the real world. Stoss noted that be- ing mission. Above, a B-52 on a Red most clearly in the new intensity of the cause of overlapping modernization Flag sortie over Nevada. Both bomber exercises and inspections. They are train- and upgrade schedules, the operating types are ready to perform nuclear or conventional missions. ing and being judged more frequently, tempo for Minuteman III operators and and more harshly, than at any point in maintenance personnel is at an all-time most of their careers. high. While on alert, “you never know Col. Ferdinand B. Stoss III, com- In some cases, the training must when something’s going to come up,” mander of the 91st Missile Wing at be intensified just to keep pace with said 2nd Lt. John Farnell, a deputy Minot AFB, N.D., noted that the loss of focus was a change in culture that “took time, and it will take time to build it back.” Part of the problem, USAF photo he explained, was that over time the space side of the 13S career field that space and missile officers share became more prestigious than the missile side. When missileers finished their initial tours, most of the best and brightest were switching to space operations for their follow-on tours. Best and Brightest Priorities have already changed. Stoss reports that space ops will still inherit the majority of graduating missileers be- cause that field requires greater numbers of midcareer officers. But the “best and brightest” missileers are now progress- ing into both career tracks—and there are more volunteers for career follow- on nuclear assignments than there are spaces available. Veteran airmen in the nuclear fields— Missile maintenance technicians work on a Minuteman III ICBM in its launch silo missiles, bombers, munitions, and main- during a nuclear surety inspection at Malmstrom AFB, Mont. AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2010 27 Photo by Sagar Pathak SSgt. Dustin Martin (l), SrA. Monicha Pugh (on ladder), and A1C Cody Mc- Setting Up for Nuclear Success Connell perform maintenance on a B-2 bomb bay simulator at Whiteman AFB, During the Cold War, Strategic Air Command had responsibility for nearly Mo. all things nuclear. In recent years, however, the nuclear mission has been split between Air Combat Command for bombers, Air Force Space Com- crew commander in the 740th Missile mand for ICBMs, and Air Force Materiel Command for sustainment. Nuclear Squadron. “It’s feast or famine.” issues were often not the top priority. This affects training as well. To restore the nuclear enterprise to its rightful place at the top of the Air “In the mid-to-late [1990s], many Force’s domestic priority list, USAF made many changes that have just recently been realized. Air Force Global Strike Command was created to alerts were the same,” said Lt. Col. oversee nuclear operations. It is the first all-new major command since Space Todd Schollars, who oversees missile Command was established in 1982. procedure training. Alerts have become Strike Command encompasses 23,000 airmen at five bases, and just as- “incredibly complex,” he said, because sumed control of the B-2 and B-52 bomber fleets in February. several missiles could be undergoing An additional B-52 squadron, the 69th Bomb Squadron, was activated at maintenance at the same time. Officials Minot so that both BUFF bases would have two operational squadrons and have had to increase the intensity of the ability to support the new Global Deterrence Force. GDF calls for one the training “just to replicate the field.” B-52 unit to spend a year at a time dedicated to nuclear missions. In other cases, the training has been The Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center at Kirtland AFB, N.M., now has intensified to meet the most stressing Air Force-wide responsibility for sustainment. The NWC was created in 2006, but it is being expanded from less than 10 personnel to more than scenarios. Capt. Tom Meagher, a B-52 200. Brig. Gen. Everett H. Thomas is the first general officer commander of aircraft commander with the 69th Bomb the weapons center. Squadron, noted that the focus for one After several years with no senior officer on the Air Staff having an ex- week at the end of March was on strategic clusively nuclear focus, USAF established the A10 assistant chief of staff attack and dealing with fighter intercepts. position. Maj. Gen. C. Donald Alston is the first A10. In recognition of the From 2007 through 2009, Minot was fact that (short of the Chief of Staff) there was no four-star general directly on the front lines of the Air Force’s responsible for nuclear sustainment, AFMC’s Gen. Donald J. Hoffman was nuclear struggles. The commander of placed in charge of oversight. the 5th Bomb Wing was among those Finally, the Air Force established a new program executive office position fired in 2007 after nuclear cruise missiles for strategic systems, collocated with the NWC at Kirtland. Brig. Gen. John F. Thompson became the first PEO for strategic systems in March. were accidentally flown from Minot to Barksdale AFB, La. 28 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2010 The commander of Minot’s missile test at any university, Klotz said, but performance, and a unit can expect wing was later relieved from command, 95 out of 100 could cause a base to to be inspected about twice per year. in October 2009, after a pair of high fail an NSI—if the errors are in the For the younger troops, today’s inten- profile nuclear-related incidents at the wrong places. sity is just a way of life. First Lt. Jannel base. Just two weeks after that, the Still, “Airmen will do what they Emery, an instructor and evaluator in 5th Bomb Wing’s replacement com- are asked to do,” said Smith, and with the 91st Operations Support Squadron mander was removed after units failed time and repetition, they “may think that tests missileers, put it succinctly: several inspections. (The three Minot this is normal.” “This is our job.” Airmen have “adapted wing commanders were all removed to intense ops,” she said. before their units joined Global Strike A Way of Life For bombers, conventional missions Command.) The goal is to identify potential were the priority for many years, but “Airmen didn’t fail the Air Force problems early, before they become it is no longer appropriate to even say when we had these breakdowns,” Maj. major issues, not to “pass” or “fail” the nuclear-capable bomb crews have Gen. C. Donald Alston, later said. “The a given number of units. Inspections divided attention, said Cox. Today’s Air Force failed our airmen. ... We had that are impossible to pass serve little focus is on nuclear responsibilities not given the enterprise the attention purpose—but so do NSIs that are not “first and foremost” with conventional that nuclear missions demand.” tough enough. operations an additional duty. With the Morale was down at Minot after the These inspections are important, nuclear mission serving as the “foun- mistakes and failed inspections last but just “one indicator of how a unit is dation” for everything the wing does, year, said CMSgt. Martin K. Smith, performing,” said Col. Sandra E. Finan, Cox said, other responsibilities such command chief for the 5th Bomb Wing, GSC inspector general at Barksdale. as the Pacific presence mission can be but the confidence has returned. “In our business, perfection is our methodically worked in. When the current bomb wing com- output,” but this must be achieved Bomber crews go beyond being mander, Col. Douglas A. Cox, was first by humans who are imperfect, Finan “dual-hatted” by offering both nuclear reassigned from Guam to Minot last noted. Built-in operational redun- and conventional capabilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Screenshot 22 Was Cleared to Commence Initial of His Body and Remained in a Coma Operations by Gen
    Air Force World By Michael Sirak, Senior Editor, with Marc Schanz, Associate Editor Cyber Unit Starts Operations rating. He will train tactical air control Twenty-fourth Air Force, USAF’s party airmen. new cyber operations arm, on Jan. Del Toro was burned over 80 percent screenshot 22 was cleared to commence initial of his body and remained in a coma operations by Gen. C. Robert Kehler, for three months, and, if he survived, head of Air Force Space Command. doctors believed he would not walk AFSPC oversees the new numbered again. He endured 120 surgeries, but air force, which is headquartered at he not only survived but is also running Lackland AFB, Tex. in 10K races. USAF photo by A1C Brett Clashman “This is a big day for the United States He persisted for more than four years Air Force,” said Kehler. His certifica- to remain in the active duty service. A tion that 24th Air Force had achieved medical board finally offered the TACP initial operational capability means airman two choices: medically retire that the organization is now deemed and train TACP airmen as a civilian or capable of performing elements of its remain in the service, training TACPs. mission to operate and protect the Air He chose the latter. Force’s portion of the US military’s cyber network. C-5M Ends Operational Tests Maj. Gen. Richard E. Webber, 24th Officials at Dover AFB, Del., an- Air Force commander, said, “Cyber nounced Jan. 30 that they had completed mission assurance is a top priority of operational testing and evaluation of the the Air Force,” and his airmen are “well C-5M Super Galaxy transport aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Maine, World War II, in Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K)
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine General University of Maine Publications University of Maine Publications 1946 University of Maine, World War II, In Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K) University of Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/univ_publications Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the History Commons Repository Citation University of Maine, "University of Maine, World War II, In Memoriam, Volume 1 (A to K)" (1946). General University of Maine Publications. 248. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/univ_publications/248 This Monograph is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in General University of Maine Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE WORLD WAR II IN MEMORIAM DEDICATION In this book are the records of those sons of Maine who gave their lives in World War II. The stories of their lives are brief, for all of them were young. And yet, behind the dates and the names of places there shines the record of courage and sacrifice, of love, and of a devotion to duty that transcends all thought of safety or of gain or of selfish ambition. These are the names of those we love: these are the stories of those who once walked with us and sang our songs and shared our common hope. These are the faces of our loved ones and good comrades, of sons and husbands. There is no tribute equal to their sacrifice; there is no word of praise worthy of their deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Verendrye Powers National Defense
    Chapter 7 Verendrye powers national defense A plaque is unveiled on Oct. 24, 2013 to commemorate a B-52 Stratofortress model placed on the Minot Air Force Base. From left are Col. Alex Mezynski, commander of the Minot Air Force Base, Scot Oathout, Boeing B-52 and Legacy Tanker Program Manager, and Verendrye Manager Bruce Carlson, who is also chairman of the Military Affairs Committee. Another similar model is also on display at the Dakota Territory Air Museum in Minot. y the early 1950s, members of Verendrye “We feel very fortunate in securing a contract Electric Cooperative had proven that a such as this for it will change the financial picture Bgroup of farmers could build a successful for the future. Currently the Air Force is asking for electric cooperative from scratch. But in 1955, the 2,000 kilowatts, a demand which is comparable to cooperative would face a new test of its abilities about one-sixth of the electricity used in the city of – a test that to this day has proven to be one of its Minot.”1 Today the base is Verendrye’s single largest greatest achievements, resulting in a decades-long user of electricity, comprising nearly 20 percent of partnership to electrify one of the most powerful its kilowatt-hour sales. places on Earth. Verendrye’s partnership with the Air Force In the July 1955 issue of North Dakota REC/ actually began in June 1951, when it energized RTC, Line Superintendent Ruben Haga announced a radar base south of Minot. That base was the cooperative signed a contract to power the Minot decommissioned decades ago, and now contains a Air Force Base.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Aircraft Team; the US Air Force Air Power Yearbook Is the Ultimate Guide to the World’S Most Powerful Air Arm
    Advanced jet TRAINING ALENIA AERMACCHI M-346 • ISRAELI SKYHAWK RETIREMENT • PACER CLASSIC T-38 TALONS • GREEK BUCKEYES AND TEXAN IIS Volume 17 • Number 3 AMERICA’S BESTSELLING MILITARY AVIATION MAGAZINE combataircraft.net EAGLE FROM THE COCKPIT Pilot stories from the mighty F-15C ‘Desert Storm’ 25 years ON F-15C victories IN THE NEWS: USAF Saves the a-10 SIKORSKY CH-53K C-5 SUPER GALAXY KING STALLION AT DOVER AFB S-3 Vikings BOW OUT OF UK £4.50 SERVICE WITH VX-30 CHINESE FIGHTER BOMBER REVIEW MARCH 2016 SPECIAL united states air force air power YEARBOOK 2016 Produced by the Combat Aircraft team; the US Air Force Air Power Yearbook is the ultimate guide to the world’s most powerful air arm. Packed with features on latest aircraft capabilities, famous squadrons and the personnel that fly and maintain the various types, plus a detailed unit and aircraft air power review. This 100-page publication is a must-have for USAF aviation fans. FEATURING: F-22 on the front line A review of the Raptor’s combat debut over Syria and recent deployment to Europe. 40 Years of exercise’ Red Flag’ A review and tribute to the world’s most famous exercise. Bayou Militia A unit review of the F-15Cs of the 122nd Fighter Squadron Louisiana ANG F-35 training Behind the scenes at Eglin and Luke AFB as the F-35 training squadrons get up to full speed. B-1 today Exclusive interviews with B-1 senior officers as we detail recent combat operations and latest JUST upgrades for the B-1 Lancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Public Affairs
    April 2004___________ ________________________________________ Panel On Public THE MODERN PIT FACILITY (MPF) Affairs No urgency for a MPF. Address key technical issues before proceeding. Issue Executive Summary Congress is considering whether to authorize construction of a Modern Pit Plutonium “pits” are the cores of modern nuclear weapons. In order to ensure that Facility capable of manufacturing the U.S. nuclear arsenal is safe and reliable, plutonium pits are closely monitored for plutonium pits for nuclear weapons, at any deterioration due to aging. an estimated cost of $2 to $4 billion. The average age of plutonium pits in the U.S. arsenal is 20 years with the oldest being about 26 years old. The minimum pit lifetime is currently estimated to be 45 to Conclusions 60 years, based largely on the modest changes observed in key properties of plutonium samples that are 40 years old. There are several technical issues to address before proceeding with The pits in the current nuclear weapons stockpile were manufactured at a facility that site selection or committing to an was shut down in 1989. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) MPF design. These decisions recently reestablished a limited capability to produce pits at the Los Alamos National should be deferred until Congress Laboratory. The NNSA has proposed an additional Modern Pit Facility (MPF) that can more thoroughly assess the could produce, depending on the final design, either 125, 250 or 450 pits per year in MPF and various alternatives single-shift operation, beginning in 2020. while supporting an enhanced research program on plutonium Recent Congressional hearings and associated testimony have indicated that a MPF aging.
    [Show full text]
  • Up from Kitty Hawk Chronology
    airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology AIR FORCE Magazine's Aerospace Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk PART ONE PART TWO 1903-1979 1980-present 1 airforcemag.com Up From Kitty Hawk Chronology Up From Kitty Hawk 1980-1989 F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighters, first flight June 1981. Articles noted throughout the chronology are hyperlinked to the online archive for Air Force Magazine and the Daily Report. 1980 March 12-14, 1980. Two B-52 crews fly nonstop around the world in 43.5 hours, covering 21,256 statute miles, averaging 488 mph, and carrying out sea surveillance/reconnaissance missions. April 24, 1980. In the middle of an attempt to rescue US citizens held hostage in Iran, mechanical difficulties force several Navy RH-53 helicopter crews to turn back. Later, one of the RH-53s collides with an Air Force HC-130 in a sandstorm at the Desert One refueling site. Eight US servicemen are killed. Desert One May 18-June 5, 1980. Following the eruption of Mount Saint Helens in northwest Washington State, the Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Service, Military Airlift Command, and the 9th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing conduct humanitarian-relief efforts: Helicopter crews lift 61 people to safety, while SR–71 airplanes conduct aerial photographic reconnaissance. May 28, 1980. The Air Force Academy graduates its first female cadets. Ninety-seven women are commissioned as second lieutenants. Lt. Kathleen Conly graduates eighth in her class. Aug. 22, 1980. The Department of Defense reveals existence of stealth technology that “enables the United States to build manned and unmanned aircraft that cannot be successfully intercepted with existing air defense systems.” Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Fehlalarme, Unfälle Und Beinahe-Katastrophen Mit Atomwaffen
    www.akav.de www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-LONG-de.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-SHORT-de.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-FOUR-PAGES-de.pdf 1/136 www.akav.de www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-LONG-en.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-SHORT-en.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-FOUR-PAGES-en.pdf Fehlalarme, Unfälle und Beinahe-Katastrophen mit Atomwaffen Uwe Werner Schierhorn [email protected] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsXMxPLYeDTniZ2aKX4b6fA Wesseling, 16. Juni, 2021 www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-LONG-de.pdf Eine Langversion, eine Kurzversion und eine 4-Seiten-Version dieses Beitrages, die 2:1 verkleinert ausgedruckt werden kann, gibt es hier: www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-LONG-de.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-SHORT-de.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-FOUR-PAGES-de.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-LONG-en.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-SHORT-en.pdf www.fwes.info/fubk-21-1-FOUR-PAGES-en.pdf Aus Gründen des Umweltschutzes bitten wir Sie, zu überlegen, ob ein Ausdruck besonders des Langversion- Artikels wirklich nötig ist! Siehe auch www.akav.de Zitat: „Wissen Sie, wenn man Raketen so schnell abschießen kann, sind Unfälle vorprogrammiert. So wie Fermi es über die Physik gesagt hat. Was nicht verboten ist, das ist vorgeschrieben. Irgendwann wird es passieren. Es gibt nichts, was den Abschuß von Atomwaffen unmöglich macht. Wenn die Wahrscheinlichkeit nicht „Null“ beträgt, dann wird es passieren.“ Frank von Hippel, Kernphysiker, Princeton University in „Countdown to Zero“ (2010) Ziele des Artikels Ziel des Artikels ist es, relevante Ereignisse bezüglich Fehlalarme, Unfälle und Beinahe-Katastrophen mit Atomwaffen darzustellen und ihre Ursachen auszuwerten.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Authorization for Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011
    S. HRG. 111–701, PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 3454 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STRATEGIC FORCES MARCH 10, 17; APRIL 14, 21, 2010 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Aug 31 2005 14:53 Mar 29, 2011 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 Y:\BORAWSKI\DOCS\62160.TXT JUNE PsN: JUNEB DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011—Part 7 STRATEGIC FORCES VerDate Aug 31 2005 14:53 Mar 29, 2011 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 Y:\BORAWSKI\DOCS\62160.TXT JUNE PsN: JUNEB S. HRG. 111–701 PT. 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON S. 3454 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 7 STRATEGIC FORCES MARCH 10, 17; APRIL 14, 21, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Air Warfare
    Strategic Air Warfare An Interview with Generals Curtis E. LeMay, Leon W. Johnson, David A. Burchinal, and Jack J. Catton Edited with an Introduction by Richard H. Kohn and Joseph P. Harahan Office of Air Force History United States Air Force Washington, D.C., 1988 The Cover B-52 Stratofortress begins low-level penetration mission in this painting by Robert Benjamin. The B-52 has been one of the most visible instruments of American strategic air power since the mid-1950s. Courtesy USAF Art Collection Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData Strategic air warfare. (USAF warrior studies) Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs. no.: D 301.96:st8/2 1. Bombing, Aerial-United States. 2. World War, 1939-1945-Aerial oper- ations, American. 3. Korean War, 1950-1953-Aerial operations, American. 4. Vietnamese Conflict, 1961-1975-Aerial operations, American. 5. United States. Air Force-History. 6. Generals-United States-Interviews. I. Le May, Curtis E. 11. Kohn, Richard H. 111. Harahan, Joseph P. IV. United States. Air Force. Office of Air Force History. V. Series UG703.277 1988 358.4'2'0973 88-600389 ISBN 0-912799-56-0 / Project Warrior Studies are published by the Office of Air Force History. The views expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of the United States Air Force or the Department of Defense. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 iv Foreword Strategic Air Warfare is part of a continuing series of historical volumes produced by the Office of Air Force History in direct support of Project Warrior.
    [Show full text]
  • A New START Model for Transparency in Nuclear Disarmament
    A New START Model for Transparency in Nuclear Disarmament Individual Country Reports Tamara Patton, Pavel Podvig, and Phillip Schell UNIDIR United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Geneva, Switzerland New York and Geneva, 2013 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * * * The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the individual authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. Copyright © United Nations, 2013 All rights reserved UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATIONS The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)—an autonomous institute within the United Nations—conducts research on disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for bilateral and multilateral disarmament and non-proliferation negotiations, and home of the Conference on Disarmament. The Institute explores current issues pertaining to the variety of existing and future armaments, as well as global diplomacy and local tensions and conflicts. Working with researchers, diplomats, government officials, NGOs and other institutions since 1980, UNIDIR acts as a bridge between the research community and governments. UNIDIR’s activities
    [Show full text]
  • Screenshot Shaw AFB, S.C., Died Oct
    Air Force World By Michael Sirak, Senior Editor, with Marc Schanz, Associate Editor F-16s Collide, Pilot Dies new KC-X tanker competition to ensure Capt. Nicholas Giglio, an F-16 pilot that the process of choosing a winning with the 77th Fighter Squadron at aircraft is fair. screenshot Shaw AFB, S.C., died Oct. 15 when Speaking at a Reuters summit in his airplane collided with another F-16 Washington, D.C., McCain suggested from Shaw over the Atlantic Ocean the Government Accountability Office, about 40 miles east of Folly Beach, as chief Congressional watchdog, S.C., during a night training mission. would be a good fit to serve in this USAF photo by SrA. SusanTracy The second pilot, Capt. Lee Bryant, role and track the progress of the managed to land his aircraft at Charles- KC-X contest between Boeing and ton AFB, S.C. Despite an exhaustive Northrop Grumman, Reuters news 48-hour search by Air Force, Coast service reported Oct. 21. Guard, and Navy air and sea assets “I would trust their judgment as to over some 8,000 square nautical miles whether the whole process is biased of sea, Giglio’s body was not recovered. toward one side or the other,” said Mc- However, debris was found, thought to Cain. His comments came as political be from his F-16. rumblings already started to emerge Col. Joe Guastella, commander of from supporters of both tanker camps Shaw’s 20th Fighter Wing, said Oct. on Capitol Hill over the fairness of 17 the ongoing accident investigation the competition, as the Air Force had “revealed that the midair collision conversed with industry on the draft itself was traumatic.” Indeed, the im- KC-X solicitation.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGSCI 21-105 5 BW Supplement
    BY ORDER OF THE COMMANDER AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE COMMAND INSTRUCTION 21-105 COMMAND 20 OCTOBER 2015 5TH BOMB WING Supplement 5 JULY 2017 Maintenance CORROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available for downloading or ordering on the e-Publishing website at www.e-Publishing.af.mil. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. OPR: HQ AFGSC/A4BX Certified by: HQ AFGSC/A4B (Col Eric Y. Moore) Supersedes: AFGSCI21-105, Pages: 68 11 January 2012 (5BWSUP) OPR: 5 MXS/MXMFS Certified by: 5 MXG/CC (Colonel Thomas C. Kirkham) Pages: 33 This instruction establishes policy and assigns responsibility to establish and support the Corrosion Prevention and Control Program for Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) IAW AFI 21-101, Aircraft and Equipment Maintenance Management, and AFI 21-202V1, Missile Maintenance Management. This instruction does not apply to Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) or to the Air National Guard (ANG); however procedures in this instruction will be followed by AFRC/ANG Classic Associate units associated with AFGSC. The authority to waive the requirements in this publication is T-2. See AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms Management, Table 1.1 for a description of the authorities associated with the Tier numbers. Submit requests for waivers through the chain of command to the appropriate Tier waiver approval authority. Units will publish a supplement to this instruction that addresses unit-specific policies not included in this instruction, and unit-specific markings applied to aircraft. Units will route to the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) of this publication for approval prior to 2 AFGSCI21-105_5BWSUPSUP 5 JULY 2017 publication.
    [Show full text]