Smoots and Anchors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Smoots and Anchors MICHAEL J. PALLAMARY / PS angle points Smoots and Anchors enjoy the use of the English I should mention that Bostyn loves to language, especially with regards ride motorcycles and when he’s not riding to writing and communication. on something with wheels, he likes watch- As Land Surveyors, we employ ing videos of motorcyclists. As we drove a broad range of terms, some along the tree lined road leading to the common and some not so much. Indeed, pumpkin farm, Bostyn started mumbling one of my greatest pleasures is reworking something about “anchors”—“nice anchors.” words and phrases into a tangible way of I kept looking out the window, trying to communicating. This sentiment brings me figure out what he was talking about, while to a recent conversation I had with a good he went on about all the “nice anchors.” I friend, one of the brightest Land Surveyors finally gave in and asked him, “Hey buddy, I know, Mr. Lee McComb. Besides being what are you talking about? What’s out friends, Lee and I enjoy a special relation- there? What are you looking at?” ship owing to our mutual friendship with “Anchors,” he replied. “Look at all those the late Curtis M. Brown. nice anchors.” Lee had just returned from Boston. It is “Anchors?” I asked him, “What anchors? where I began my surveying career in the What are you talking about?” He pointed early 70’s. Lee had been walking around the across the road again. “Where are they?” city along one of my favorite routes, from “Over there,” he said, pointing. “All over. Harvard Square, south, past MIT, down Look at those great anchors!” Massachusetts Avenue, over the 364.4 I shook my head, confused, looking for smoots long Harvard Bridge, a magnificent power lines and power poles, thinking he structure that spans the Charles River. must be referring to guy wires or something. Lee made mention of the smoots and I There are many ways to measure a piece There certainly weren’t any boats out there. of land. It is always important to use the estimated him to be 1.15 smoots long. We correct units. Anchors the way! After we passed another rolling field, I both enjoyed that. watched him wave his finger up and down, The “smoot” was created in October tracing the hills. 1958 after Oliver R. Smoot, a 5-foot, 7-inch It suddenly dawned on me! “Acres?” Is tall MIT pledge decided to measure the Standards Institute (ANSI, 2001–02) and that what you mean?” length of the bridge with his body. After then, president of the International “Yeah Poppy,” he replied, glad I was on repeatedly laying himself down, over and Organization for Standardization (ISO, the same page with him. “That’s it. Acres!” over, to see how long the bridge was, he 2003–04), a fitting recognition for his I nodded my head. I got it, in spite of the grew exhausted whereupon his fraternity unique brand of humor. fact that I’d come to like the anchor as a brothers carried him the balance of the This story of the smoot brings me to unit of measurement. ◾ way. In 2011, the unique unit of measure- a recent conversation I had with my ment, the product of a quintessential MIT grandson, Bostyn. A few weeks before student prank, was entered as one of the Halloween, my wife and I took him and our Michael Pallamary, PS, is the author of 10,000 new words to the fifth edition of the grandnephews hunting for pumpkins, an several books and numerous articles. He American Heritage Dictionary. annual family tradition. Needless to say, my is a frequent lecturer at conferences and seminars and he teaches real property to Smoot graduated from MIT with the grandson always wants to find the biggest attorneys and other members of the legal class of 1962, became a lawyer, and later possible pumpkin to eventually be carved profession. He has been in the surveying became chairman of the American National up into a jack-o-lantern. profession since 1971. Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • January 2016 • Copyright 2016 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com.
Recommended publications
  • Tahoma Literary Review – Issue 13 Tahomaliteraryreview.Com
    TLR Tahoma Literary Review – Issue 13 tahomaliteraryreview.com TAHOMA LITERARY REVIEW Number 13 Fall/Winter 2018 Copyright © 2018 Tahoma Literary Review, LLC Seattle • California tahomaliteraryreview.com All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or trans - mitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, includ - ing photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval sys - tem, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about permission to reproduce selections from this book, contact the publishers by email at [email protected]. tahoma literary review III Tahoma Literary Review Ann Beman Prose Editor Jim Gearhart Managing Editor Mare Heron Hake Poetry Editor Yi Shun Lai Prose Editor Joe Ponepinto Layout & Design Petrea Burchard Copy Editor Associate Fiction Editors Michal Lemberger Stefen Styrsky Cover Artist Pausha Foley Founding Editors Joe Ponepinto Kelly Davio tahoma literary review V About the Cover “Ales-captem,” Pausha Foley here is a certain feeling one gets when Tfacing mountains covered in snow. The closer one approaches the stronger it becomes—the feeling of still, austere presence. Devoid of sound, devoid of scent. Unmovable, unshakable, untouchable. One could say: lifeless. But it is emphatically not that—rather it is the feeling one experiences when facing the foundations of life. The raw, bare bones of life stripped of all color and sound and emotion. Stripped of meaning, yearning, of striving. Stripped of hopes and dreams, of ambition and desperation alike. When nothing is left but the cold, hard essence of existence. This experience of facing the raw, bare essence of existence is what I attempt to convey through my drawings.
    [Show full text]
  • FENWAY Project Completion Report
    BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Public Library http://www.archive.org/details/fenwayprojectcomOObost 1983 Survey & Planninsr Grant mperty Of bGblu^ MT A.nTunKifv PART I -FENWAY Project Completion Report submitted August 31, 1984 to Massachusetts Historical Commission Uteary Boston Landmarks Commission Boston Redevelopment Authority COVER PHOTO: Fenway, 1923 Courtesy of The Bostonian Society FENWAY PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Prepared by Rosalind Pollan Carol Kennedy Edward Gordon for THE BOSTON LANDMARKS COMMISSION AUGUST 1984 PART ONE - PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT (contained in this volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION Brief history of The Fenway Review of Architectural Styles Notable Areas of Development and Sub Area Maps II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Districts National Register of Historic Places Boston Landmark Districts Architectural Conservation Districts B. Individual Properties National Register Listing Boston Landmark Designation Further Study Areas Appendix I - Sample Inventory Forms Appendix II - Key to IOC Scale Inventory Maps Appendix III - Inventory Coding System Map I - Fenway Study Area Map II - Sub Areas Map III - District Recommendations Map IV - Individual Site Recommendations Map V - Sites for Further Study PART TWO - FENWAY INVENTORY FORMS (see separate volume) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. METHODOLOGY General Procedures Evaluation - Recording Research III. BUILDING INFORMATION FORMS '^^ n •— LLl < ^ LU :l < o > 2 Q Z) H- CO § o z yi LU 1 L^ 1 ■ o A i/K/K I. INTRODUCTION The Fenway Preservation Study, conducted from September 1983 to July 1984, was administered by the Boston Landmarks Commission, with the assistance of a matching grant-in-aid from the Department of the Interior, National Park Service, through the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Office of the Secretary of State, Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Cultural Landscape Report - Introduction 1
    C U L T U R A L L A N D S C A P E R E P O R T T H E E S P L A N A D E B O S T O N , M A S S A C H U S E T T S Prepared for The Esplanade Association 10 Derne Street Boston, MA 02114 Prepared by Shary Page Berg FASLA 11 Perry Street Cambridge, MA 02139 April 2007 CONTENTS Introduction . 1 PART I: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 1. Early History (to 1893) . 4 Shaping the Land Beacon Hill Flat Back Bay Charlesgate/Bay State Road Charlesbank and the West End 2. Charles River Basin (1893-1928) . 11 Charles Eliot’s Vision for the Lower Basin The Charles River Dam The Boston Esplanade 3. Redesigning the Esplanade (1928-1950) . 20 Arthur Shurcliff’s Vision: 1929 Plan Refining the Design 4. Storrow Drive and Beyond (1950-present) . 30 Construction of Storrow Drive Changes to Parkland Late Twentieth Century PART II: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS 5. Charlesbank. 37 Background General Landscape Character Lock Area Playground/Wading Pool Area Lee Pool Area Ballfields Area 6. Back Bay. 51 Background General Landscape Character Boating Area Hatch Shell Area Back Bay Area Lagoons 7. Charlesgate/Upper Park. 72 Background General Landscape Character Charlesgate Area Linear Park 8. Summary of Findings . 83 Overview/Landscape Principles Character Defining Features Next Steps BIBLIOGRAPHY. 89 APPENDIX A – Historic Resources . 91 APPENDIX B – Planting Lists . 100 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The Esplanade is one of Boston’s best loved and most intensively used open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Management
    A landscape park requires, more than most works of men, continuity of management. Its perfection is a slow process. Its directors must thoroughly Standard maintenance apprehend the fact that the beauty of its landscape is all that justifies the includes cutting grass, picking existence of a large public space in the midst, or even on the immediate up litter three times a week in borders, of a town. As trustees of park scenery, they will be especially watchful to prevent injury thereto from the intrusion of incongruous or obtrusive the summer (daily when nec- structures, statues, gardens (whether floral, botanic, or zoologic), speedways, essary), repairing potholes, or any other instruments of special modes of recreation, however desirable such sweeping parkways, and emp- may be in their proper place. tying trash barrels. A separate CHARLES WILLIAM ELIOT, CHARLES ELIOT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, crew prunes and removes dead and hazardous trees. The or the Charles River Basin to continue as Boston’s Central Park, MDC Engineering and substantial investments of time, funds, and staff will be required Construction Division con- over the next fifteen years. When the master plan for New York’s tracts out work for larger park Central Park was completed in , a partnership between the city projects, such as bridges and parkland restoration. MAINTAINING THE SHORE LINE IS ONE OF and the Central Park Conservancy spent millions of dollars over THE MOST CHALLENGING MAINTENANCE TASKS IN THE BASIN. (MDC photo) ten years to restore this neglected resource. Crews trained in park Existing Conditions and Issues restoration were added to existing maintenance crews, dramatically A detailed study of maintenance operations, budgets, and staffing was improving care.
    [Show full text]
  • Section E Western Avenue Bridge to Boston University Bridge
    Section E Western Avenue Bridge to Boston University Bridge The Charles River Reservation between the Western Avenue Bridge and Boston University both sides of Memorial Drive. Raised crossings should be added to enhance the visibility of (BU) Bridge is very narrow, with the exception of Magazine Beach. The River Street and the path and to prioritize the path users over the turning motor vehicles. Western Avenue Bridges are both currently in redesign by MassDOT. The City of Cambridge has long-term redevelopment plans for the shopping center between Cycle tracks are currently part of the design for both the River Street and Western Avenue Pleasant Street and Magazine Street. In the short term, bicycle and pedestrian improvements Bridges. There is an existing cycle track and bike lane on the Boston side of Western should be made through the parking lot, a portion of which is a public right-of-way. Avenue, and a cycle track is currently under construction for the Cambridge side of South Bank. The segment of the path on the Boston side, downriver from the River Street Western Avenue (Figure 56). Bridge, is extremely narrow and makes two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic uncomfortable. North Bank. On the Cambridge side of the river, there is a gap in the existing and planned MassDOT is widening the path as part of the River Street Bridge rehabilitation. However, bicycle infrastructure on River Street between the River Street Bridge and Putnam Avenue. additional widening is recommended to bring the clear path width to 10 feet. This additional There are existing bike lanes on River Street between Putnam Avenue and Central Square, widening may require a cantilever to allow the path to extend over the seawall.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Campus Map Welcome to MIT
    A B C D E F MIT Campus Map Welcome to MIT Cambridgeside Place All MIT buildings are designated Use the online campus map: by numbers. Under this numbering http://whereis.mit.edu/ First Street EE20 EE19 1 system, a single room number 1 serves to completely identify any Find your way around campus Edwin H. Land Boulevard location on the campus. In a with your phone: http://m.mit.edu typical room number, such as 7-121, Harvard Square & Central Square the figure(s) preceding the hyphen Parking gives the building number, the first = public parking (pay lots) number following the hyphen, the NE83 Rogers StreetNE125A = MIT permit parking Fulkerson Street floor, and the last two numbers, Bent Street University N57 the room. Park MIT Federal Credit Union Please refer to the building index on Le Meridien Cambridge Sixth Street Hotel N50 State Street Binney Street the reverse side of this map, N51 NE48 Sidney Street 700 TS Windsor Street Sidney-Pacific if the room number is unknown. NE46 Graduate 600 TS Random NW61 MIT Museum N52 400 TS NW98 Residence 35 Hall 500 TS The Charles NE35 88 Sidney Landsdowne Portland Street Stark Draper Broadway Street Street NE49 Laboratory, Inc. 2 65 Landsdowne Massachusetts Avenue 2 Street NE47 Landsdowne Street NE45 300 TS 40 Technology Square Main Street 200 TS NW86 Pacific Street Galileo Way Landsdowne Cross Street 80 Landsdowne Street Street (garage) 100 TS Residence Inn by Marriott 70 Pacific Edgerton House Street Lot McGovern Institute for Albany Street Brain Research NW22 Albany Street N4 NW23 NW17 NW16 Parking Garage Brain & Cognitive 46 Whitehead Institute N16A Sciences Complex Ashdown House NW10 N10 The Picower Institute NE30 158 Mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Map Brochure
    The Charles With support from the community, we raise money for projects to restore and River Esplanade enhance the Park, employ two full-time horticulturists who maintain ten THE CHARLES RIVER Welcome to The Charles River Esplanade. ornamental gardens, as well as 1,700 The Esplanade is a continuous Park that trees, and host free Park programming Esplanade Map stretches over three miles from the such as Healthy, Fit & Fun free outdoor Museum of Science to the Boston University fitness classes, and Children in the Park, Bridge on the Boston side of the Charles which brings nearly 1,000 children with River. We encourage you to enjoy your time limited access to green space to the exploring this beautiful green space. Esplanade each summer. ABOUT THE ESPLANADE ASSOCIATION The Esplanade Association is a privately funded nonprofit organization that works to revitalize and enhance the Charles River Esplanade, preserve natural green space, and build community by providing educational, cultural, and recreational programs for everyone. © JB Parret Photography Help Us Make Life Better BECOME A MEMBER on the Esplanade The Esplanade Association receives no government funding. We depend on the Though the Esplanade Association has generosity of our members to support accomplished much since 2001, the Park the work we do to care for the Esplanade. requires significant and ongoing care to ensure that it remains beautiful and We have different levels of membership sustainable. Whether you make a financial so you can choose the one that is right for contribution, become a member, or you. To learn more or become a member, volunteer, your support helps to make life visit www.esplanadeassociation.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles River Traffic Patterns
    Newton Yacht Club Channel Upstream: stay to the right side (Watertown) of all buoys; be careful Note: of the shallows close to the river’s Very shallow edge Downstream: Use the channel between the buoys; stay clear of the MDC Boat Launch Ramp Upstream Community Rowing NEWTON YACHT CLUB CHANNEL Charles River Traffic Patterns Upstream: Keep right of all buoys (Watertown)—very shallow Downstream: Stay between the buoys and keep clear of the boat ramp North Bridge traffic rules Bridge Traffic Beacon (looking upstream) North Beacon (View looking upstream) Street Bridge Normal Traffic SANDBAR Downstream: Arsenal Cross into upstream Use only if necessary traffic to avoid, but not excessively. Caution; see notes Keep to the right side of the river-- Do not use Eliot especially on turns. Keep both boats and blades on the right third of Arsenal Bridge the river (as if it were a 3-lane Downstream: Upstream: Stay along shore Keep right. Watch highway). Stay right on turns, and (~12 feet) through for boats crossing Downstream: Stay along shore (~12 feet) the turn. to/from CBC. do not cut corners. through the turn. Northeastern Upstream: Keep right. Watch for boats crossing Pass on the left (port). Boats Boathouse to/from CBC. being overtaken shall yield to shore. Overtaking boats are responsible for Anderson General River Rules Head of the Charles avoiding a collision and must be Eliot Turn, Downstream: (HOCR) Finish Line Keep your starboard oars NO MORE prepared to slow down or stop to • Keep to the right side (1/3) of Upstream: than one oar length from shore (~12 Normal traffic avoid contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles River Lower Basin Guide
    Charles River Lower Basin North Upstream Magazine Beach BU Bridge BU Bridge (Cottage Farm Bridge) (Cottage Farm Bridge) BU Sailing Pavilion C A M B R I D G E Shallow! DEWOLFE BOATHOUSE Lane Boston University Harvard Bridge Targets (Mass Ave Bridge) BOSTON CAMBRIDGE Hyatt Pedestrian Hotel Overpass Union Lane merging Union 8 downstream arches total 5 4 3 2 1 0 (Upstream) Lane (4 on each side of the lighted platform) Primary Racing Lanes: & 2 Finish 3 & 4 (white arch) MIT Lane returning 5 4 3 MIT Lane launching: (Downstream): Stay along shore, watch Continue along the out for upstream crews Boston shore until just on the 2K race course MIT Lane downstream of the Hyatt and downstream crews Longfellow Bridge Hotel before crossing to returning to MIT. (Salt & Pepper Bridge) the Cambridge side. Stay clear of upstream crews BOSTON CAMBRIDGE on the 2K course. 1500m PIERCE BOATHOUSE Do not use Caution: Racing crews on Massachusetts Institute of Technology center arch upstream side of bridge Muddy River 2K Course Notes Harvard (Mass Ave) Bridge Arches Shallow 1000m • The “Racing Arch” is marked with white abutments; Lanes 3 and 4 share this lane. 5 4 3 2 Harvard Bridge • Lanes 2 and 5 have their own arches to the right and left (Mass Ave Bridge) of the Racing Arch. Steering Targets • Lane targets installed on the Boston shore in the vicinity of Downstream: MIT Sailing Pavilion BU correspond to lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5. Aim on the State House (gold dome), then at the • The Start line, 500-, 1000-, and 1500-meter marks Boston corner of the are indicated by white lines painted on the Cambridge Longfellow Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abnormal Unit of Distance Contents
    Smoot An Abnormal Unit of Distance Contents 1 Oliver R. Smoot 1 1.1 Biography ................................................. 1 1.2 References ................................................. 1 1.3 External links ............................................... 2 2 Smoot 3 2.1 Unit description .............................................. 3 2.2 History ................................................... 3 2.3 Practical use ................................................ 3 2.4 See also .................................................. 4 2.5 References ................................................. 5 2.6 External links ............................................... 6 3 Harvard Bridge 8 3.1 Conception ................................................ 8 3.2 Engineering ................................................ 9 3.3 Naming .................................................. 11 3.4 Maintenance and events .......................................... 11 3.4.1 Engineering study, 1971-1972 .................................. 12 3.4.2 Superstructure replacement, 1980s ................................ 13 3.4.3 Subsequent events ......................................... 14 3.5 Bridge length measurement ........................................ 14 3.6 See also .................................................. 15 3.7 Notes ................................................... 16 3.8 References ................................................. 16 3.9 Bibliography ................................................ 18 3.10 External links ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2—Existing Conditions: Massachusetts Turnpike Ramps
    Massachusetts Turnpike Boston Ramps and Bowker Overpass Study December 2015 Chapter 2—Existing Conditions: Massachusetts Turnpike Ramps 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents an analysis of existing transportation conditions for the study area. The traffic conditions for a typical workday were analyzed, with an emphasis on the peak AM and PM commuting hours. The analysis included traffic conditions, crash analyses, and crash patterns for the Massachusetts Turnpike and associated roadways in the study area (shown in Figure 2-1), as well as reviews of transit services, environmental conditions, and land uses. 2.2 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Developing a basic knowledge of current traffic conditions fosters an understanding of where congestion occurs as the Massachusetts Turnpike is currently configured and where it likely will occur in the future. The traffic analysis for this study was based on traffic count data collected within the study area. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s Office of Transportation Planning (OTP) obtained traffic data for the Massachusetts Turnpike between the Allston toll plaza and the Ted Williams Tunnel, and for specific intersections throughout the study area. The traffic volumes used in this analysis are presented in Section 2.2.1. Section 2.2.2 presents the analysis of the freeway and merge/diverge conditions using these traffic volumes. In addition to the Massachusetts Turnpike, other key intersections and arterials throughout the study area were analyzed (see Sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4). 2.2.1 Traffic Volumes in 2010 The segment of the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90) between the Allston toll plaza and the Ted Williams Tunnel, in South Boston, is approximately 4.5 miles in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles River Pathways Report
    Charles River Pathways Dr. Paul Dudley White Bike Path Museum of Science to Watertown Square Analysis of the South Shore with conceptual design Proposal Charles River Conservancy August 2006 Prepared by Ofri Gilan 1 “The mission of the Charles River Conservancy is to make the parklands more active, attractive and accessible for all”. Improving the 17 miles of pathways along the shoreline will make it safer and easier, thus encouraging increased use for commuting and recreation. This report gives an overview of the current state of the southern shore, lists recommendations, shows examples from elsewhere and illustrates potential underpasses. 2 Section Analysis Overview Section A- Galen St. bridge to Nth Beacon St. bridge Section B- Nth. Beacon St. bridge to Arsenal St. bridge Section C- Arsenal St. bridge to Eliot bridge Section D- Eliot bridge to Weeks footbridge Section E- Western Ave bridge to River St. bridge Section F- River St. bridge to BU bridge Section G- BU bridge to Harvard bridge Section H- Harvard bridge to Longfellow bridge Section I- Longfellow bridge to Craigie bridge 3 . BRIDGE SECTION A GALEN ST Good Fair 4 Poor SECTION D BRIDGE ELIOT SECTION C ANDERSON BRIDGE AVENUE BRIDGE WESTERN SECTION E SECTION B ARSENAL NTH BEACON ST BRIDGE . RIVER ST SECTION F . 5 CRAIGIE BRIDGE SECTION I LONGFELLOW BRIDGE VENUE BRIDGE A SECTION H WESTERN SECTION E HAR SECTION G SECTION F V ARD BRIDGE BU BRIDGE BU 6 Section A Galen St. Bridge to North Beacon St. Bridge . BRIDGE GALEN ST NTH BEACON ST . 7 Narrow path immediately adjacent to the road Dangerous Intersection: Blindspot due to height of vegetation and angle of intersection; No pedestrian traffic light : Avenue of root heaves Alternative route created by cyclist providing a 8 safer option to the paved path Masterplan P.160 (1 of 2) directions.
    [Show full text]