Tharros – Capo San Marco in the Phoenician and Punic Age
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Archaeometric Researches on the Provenance of Mediterranean Archaic Phoenician and Punic Pottery --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: ESPR-D-15-05757R1 Full Title: Archaeometric Researches on the Provenance of Mediterranean Archaic Phoenician and Punic Pottery Article Type: Research Article Corresponding Author: Maria Letizia Amadori, M.D. university of urbino Urbino, Pesaro ITALY Corresponding Author Secondary Information: Corresponding Author's Institution: university of urbino Corresponding Author's Secondary Institution: First Author: Maria Letizia Amadori, M.D. First Author Secondary Information: Order of Authors: Maria Letizia Amadori, M.D. Carla Del Vais, PhD Paola Fermo, PhD Paolo Pallante, PhD Order of Authors Secondary Information: Funding Information: Abstract: The aim of this study is to set up a first chemical database that could represent the starting point for a reliable classification method to discriminate between Archaic Phoenician and Punic pottery on the base of their chemical data. This database up to now can discriminate between several different area of production and provenance and can be applied also to unknown ceramic samples of comparable age and production areas. More than one hundred ceramic fragments were involved in this research, coming from various archaeological sites having a crucial importance in the context of the Phoenician and Punic settlement in central and western Mediterranean: Carthage (Tunisia), Toscanos (South Andalusia, Spain), Sulci, Monte Sirai, Othoca, Tharros and Pithecusa (Italy). Since long time archaeologists hypothesized that Mediterranean Archaic Phoenician and Punic pottery had a local or just a regional diffusion, with the exception of some particular class like transport amphorae. To verify the pottery provenance, statistical analyses were carried out to define the existence of different ceramic compositional groups characterized by a local origin or imported from other sites. -
Mineralogical-Petrographic and Physical-Mechanical Features
minerals Article Mineralogical-Petrographic and Physical-Mechanical Features of the Construction Stones in Punic and Roman Temples of Antas (SW Sardinia, Italy): Provenance of the Raw Materials and Conservation State Stefano Columbu , Emanuela Gaviano, Luca Giacomo Costamagna and Dario Fancello * Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy; [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (L.G.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Antas site (SW Sardinia, Italy) is of fundamental cultural importance because it testifies the presence of Nuragic, Punic and Roman civilizations from the second millennium to the third century BC. This work focuses on the Punic and the Roman temples and aims to define their conservation state and provenance of construction materials through their minero-petrographic and physical-mechanical characterization. In addition, artificial geomaterials used in restoration works comprising a partial anastylosis and a consolidation intervention on the monument, were investigated to evaluate the aesthetic, petrographic and petrophysical compatibility with the original materials. The results indicate that Punic builders preferred to use a porous sandstone coming from Citation: Columbu, S.; Gaviano, E.; at least few kilometres away from the site. By contrast, Roman builders opted for the use of the less Costamagna, L.G.; Fancello, D. porous and harder local metadolostones, more difficult to quarry and to hew but promptly available Mineralogical-Petrographic and Physical-Mechanical Features of the in the surrounding area. The Roman temple still preserves decorative architectural elements (as Construction Stones in Punic and the Pronao threshold and the mosaic tesserae) whose source is definitely not local, suggesting the Roman Temples of Antas (SW import of these materials. -
Cultural Exchange on Malta and Gozo
Cultural exchange on Malta and Gozo A study of the Aegyptiaca on Malta and Gozo from the Phoenician and Punic periods. J.L. van Sister 1 Front: Golden double amulet from Ghain Klieb: http://www.lessing-photo.com/p2/110106/11010613.jpg 2 UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN Cultural exchange on Malta and Gozo A study on the Aegyptiaca on Malta and Gozo from the Phoenician and Punic periods. J.L. van Sister 15/6/2012 S0912395 BA3 Thesis Supervisor: Dr. J.J. Stöger Archaeology of the Classical World Universiteit Leiden, Faculty of Archaeology Leiden, 2012 1 Name: J.L. van Sister Studentno.: S0912395 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1. Historical Context ........................................................................................................... 7 2. Earlier Research ............................................................................................................ 11 3. Aegyptiaca: A contextual study and interpretation of the material evidence ................ 15 3.1 Sarcophagi .............................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Amulets ................................................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Amulet containers ........................................................................................... -
Download (4MB)
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI “FEDERICO II” PhD thesis “Marine organisms model species for the assessment of biological, environmental and economic impacts on marine aquaculture in Campania” Coordinatore Candidato Tutor Prof. Dott. ssa Dott. Giuseppe Cringoli Sara Fioretti Francesco Paolo Patti Prof. Aniello Anastasio “First, think. Second, believe. Third, dream. And finally, dare. If you can dream it, you can do it” Walt Disney Index Abbreviations list ......................................................................................13 Figures list .................................................................................................15 Tables list ...................................................................................................17 Abstract .....................................................................................................19 Introduction ..............................................................................................23 I Aquaculture in Campania: from the origin to the current times ..........25 II Aquaculture today: global and European trend ..................................27 III Aquaculture in Italy ...........................................................................30 IV Aquaculture in Campania ..................................................................31 V Mussel farms: breeding systems .........................................................33 VI Mussel farms threats and future perspectives for the Campanian industries ................................................................................................35 -
Selinunte Si Racconta
SELINUNTE SI RACCONTA CAM 5 MAGGIO 2010 Atti della giornata di studi CAMCANTIERE/3 SELINUNTE SI RACCONTA CAM 5 MAGGIO 2010 Atti della giornata di studi Baglio Calcara - Triscina di Selinunte Castelvetrano - Trapani Contributi di: Enrico Acquaro Giuseppe Salluzzo Simone Rambaldi Alessandro Iannucci Nicola Cusumano Federica Schiariti Manuel Martinez Paola De VIta Antonella Lamia Martine Fourmont Fotografie degli aautori salvo dove diversamente specificato Progetto grafico Sciara srl Produzione Fondazione Kepha Onlus Le fotografie di copertina e di pagina 23 e 49 sono di Antonio Sorrentino INDICE Enrico Acquaro, Introduzione…...................................................................4 Giuseppe Salluzzo, Le cave di Cusa: il tempio G, i rocchi e la strada del trasporto.......................................................................…....6 Simone Rambaldi, Empedocle e la bonifica di Selinunte: un breve riesame......................................................................................12 Alessandro Iannucci, Il tempio E della collina orientale di Selinunte: ipotesi per un’identificazione del culto.………………………………................18 Nicola Cusumano, Purificare e riconciliare la polis: la Lex sacra…................24 Federica Schiariti, Zeus Meilichios: tipologia religiosa e rapporti con il mondo punico…..............................................................................28 Manuel Martinez, Gli Aegyptiaca di Selinunte….........................................34 Enrico Acquaro, L’archivio del tempio di Apollo: alcune -
Phoenician and Punic Amphorae from S'urachi
Phoenician and Punic Amphorae from S’Urachi (San Vero Milis, Sardinia) Andrea Roppa, Emanuele Madrigali, Alfonso Stiglitz, and Peter van Dommelen Context Amphora typologies: chronological aspects The site of S’Urachi in west-central Sardinia was continuously inhabited between the Bronze Age and the Roman early Slightly later is the chronology of a rim fragment of a T-2.1.1.1. = B5 amphora type, which goes back to the first half of the 7th The overall distribution of Phoenician and Punic amphora types from the excavations in sectors E and D at S’Urachi points to Imperial period. Past research at the site has already shed light on the gradual transformations the settlement underwent century BC. From the western Mediterranean, traditionally associated to production areas at the Phoenician settlements in a substantial increase in the presence of amphorae from the late 7th century BC, as shown by the chronological profile based throughout the Iron Age, when interaction with Phoenician newcomers resulted in substantial changes in the indigenous Andalusia, are two rim fragments of type T-10.1.2.1., dated to the mid 7th – early 6th century BC. on a weighted mean of a 25-year chronological reference unit (fig. 6). community (fig. 1). Since 2013 ongoing excavations, jointly supported by the museum of San Vero Milis and the Joukowsky From the late 7th century BC and throughout the 6th century BC, Phoenician amphorae were much more abundant at Phoenician and Punic Amphorae. Institute of Brown University have brought to light securely stratified contexts and a large assemblage of primarily ceramic S’Urachi, as is evident from 18 fragments of type T-2.1.1.2. -
The First Punic War, 264 to 241 B.C
Carthage Scenario Book V2.0 July, 2013 VOLUME #2 of THE ANCIENT WORLD SERIES A RICHARD H. BERG GAME DESIGN SCENARIO BOOK Version 2.0 July, 203 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S CR .0 Introduction ................................................... 2 7.6 Naval Transport ........................................... 2 CR 2.0 Components ................................................... 2 7.7 Port Harbor Capacity and Winter ................ 22 CR 2. The Maps ................................................ 2 CR 8.0 Land Combat ................................................. 23 CR 2.2 Counters ................................................. 2 CR 9.0 Cities and Sieges ............................................ 23 CR 2.3 Player Aids ............................................. 4 CR 0.0 Manpower .................................................... 24 CR 3.0 The Sequence of Play .................................... 4 10. Raising Legions ......................................... 24 The Roman Political and Command System ............ 5 10.2 Placement of Roman Manpower ............... 25 CR 5. The Magistrates of Rome ....................... 5 10.3 Legion Training ......................................... 25 CR 5.2 Elections and Assignment of Magistrates . 7 10.4 Carthaginian Manpower ............................ 25 CR 5.3 Prorogue of Imperium ............................ 10 10.5 Carthaginian Army Efficiency ................... 26 CR 5.4 Magistrate Restrictions .......................... 10 CR 2.0 Diplomacy .................................................. -
Phoenician Sailors and Traders Transformed the Ancient World by Ancient History Encyclopedia, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 07.31.19 Word Count 976 Level 850L
Phoenician sailors and traders transformed the ancient world By Ancient History Encyclopedia, adapted by Newsela staff on 07.31.19 Word Count 976 Level 850L Image 1. Troops from a United Nations peacekeeping force on the Israeli-Lebanese border mingle with tourists exploring the Phoenician ruins in Tyre, Lebanon, July 29, 2017. Photo by Jon Gambrell for AP The wealth of Phoenician cities such as Tyre, Sidon and Byblos was based on trade. Indeed, it was the search for new goods and new markets that caused the Phoenicians to found colonies. Phoenician civilization first developed in the Levant. The Levant is an area that today includes the states of Lebanon, Syria and Israel. From the 10th century B.C. onward, Phoenicians branched out from this homeland. They colonized territories throughout the ancient Mediterranean. Sailing And Trading The Phoenicians were not only excellent traders. They were skilled navigators as well. They traveled widely and established colonies wherever they went. The major Phoenician trade routes were by sea to the Greek islands, across southern Europe, down the Atlantic coast of Africa, and up to ancient Britain. Trade and the search for valuable goods led to the founding of trading posts. Over time, these sites grew. Their populations became larger. More and more buildings were erected. In time, simple This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. trading posts turned into large cities and fully developed colonies. The Phoenician colonization of the Mediterranean happened in stages. Sometime between the 12th and eighth centuries B.C., various small trade centers were established. -
Roman Republican and Imperial Report Final
REPORT ON ROMAN REPUBLICAN AND ROMAN IMPERIAL COINS Prepared on behalf of the International Association of Professional Numismatists for the United States Cultural Property Advisory Committee June 26, 2020 Roman Republican Coin Finds Beyond the Borders of the Italian Republic Definition The term “Roman Republican coinage” refers to gold, silver and bronze coins struck between c. 326 BC, the accepted date of the first Romano-Campanian bronze issue naming the Romans in Greek script, and 27 BC, the year in which Octavian assumed broad constitutional powers and the title Augustus, an act that established him as the first Roman Emperor. Mints and Bullion Sources The primary mint of the Roman Republic was located in the Temple of Juno Moneta at Rome, where vast quantities of metal derived from sources outside Italy, such as plunder, indemnities on defeated enemies, taxes imposed on conquered cities and peoples, and the mines of Spain were struck into coin.1 According to Plutarch’s Life of Pompey (45.3) in the year 60 BC alone, the value of silver brought to Rome from these provincial sources amounted to some 85 million denarii (roughly equivalent to 316 US tons). Metallurgical analyses show that before the late second century, Roman Republican denarii are composed primarily of silver with isotope signatures linking them to sources in Asia Minor.2 All of this raises a real moral conundrum even before questions of extra-Italian circulation and find evidence are considered. Since the metal for Roman Republican coins largely comes from sources outside of Italy—most commonly by looting and coercion—and can be shown through scientific means to have come from specific sources, who should the coins belong to? International law (Article 8 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court) condemns wartime looting as a crime and whenever possible would seek to restore looted property to its rightful owner. -
Abstract Book
19th International Congress of Classical Archaeology Cologne/Bonn (Germany), 22 – 26 May 2018 PRACTICAL INFORMATION WiFi – Gürzenich: hotspot Köln • Cologne/Bonn (Germany) WiFi – University of Bonn: eduroam Emergency number: 112 th Taxi – Cologne: + 49 (0) 221-2882 XIX Archaeology and Economy Taxi – Bonn: + 49 (0) 228-55 55 55 ICCA in the Ancient World aiac2018.de [email protected] WELCOME TO COLOGNE AND BONN! – 26 May 2018 Abstracts – 26 May 2018 Cologne/Bonn (Germany), 22 PATRONAGE Under the patronage of the Minister-President of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia Armin Laschet. ABSTRACTS CO-OPERATION PARTNER 19th International Congress of Classical Archaeology 19th International Congress of Classical 018_AIAC_Book_of_Abstracts_Cover.indd 1 07.05.18 17:06 19th International Congress of Classical Archaeology Archaeology and Economy in the Ancient World 22-26 May 2018 Cologne/Bonn ABSTRACTS keynotes | panels & papers | posters| workshops EDITORIAL STAFF Simon Kleinschmidt Diana Wozniok Christine Avenarius Nickolas Gehrmann DESIGN Ulrike Kersting PRINTING sedruck Cologne Germany © AIAC 2018 Cologne/Bonn www.aiac2018.de Table of Content 1. Keynote Abstracts 7 2. Panel and Paper Abstracts 11 Session 1: The Human factor: Demography, nutrition, health, epidemics 11 Panel 1.1 Economy, Society and Health-related Quality of Life in the Ancient World: Bioarchaeological perspectives from the Eastern Mediterranean 11 Panel 1.2 Wealthy and Healthy? Methodological Approaches to Non-élite Burials 15 Panel 1.3 The Economic Contribution of Migrants -
Khalet Al-Jam‟A. a Bronze and Iron Ages Necropolis Near Bethlehem (Palestine): Results of the 2019 Archaeological Excavations
[Vicino Oriente XXIII (2019), pp. 1-22] KHALET AL-JAM‟A. A BRONZE AND IRON AGES NECROPOLIS NEAR BETHLEHEM (PALESTINE): RESULTS OF THE 2019 ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS Lorenzo Nigro - Daria Montanari - Gaia Cecconi - Sapienza University of Rome Mohammed Ghayyada - Jehad Yasine - Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities - Department of Archaeology and Cultural Heritage In Spring 2019 the Italian-Palestinian joint team of Sapienza University of Rome and the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities of Palestine Dept. of Archaeology and Cultural Heritage resumed rescue excavations at the Necropolis of Khalet al-Jam’a, 2.2 Km south-east from the Church of Nativity in Bethlehem. Works were focused on Tomb A7, identified in 2015, a huge underground burial place, dating back to the Iron IIC (8th-7th century BC), but also including earlier depositions dating from the EB IVB-MB. This suggests that an original EBIV tomb was modified and re-used in the following Middle Bronze and Iron Age. A provisional report of activities and finds is offered below. Keywords: Bethlehem; necropolis; Early Bronze Age IV; Middle Bronze Age; Iron Age II 1. INTRODUCTION In April 2019, the joint team of the Palestinian MOTA-DACH and Sapienza University of Rome1 resumed archaeological activities at the Necropolis of Khalet al-Jam‟a, 2.2 Km south-east from the center of Bethlehem.2 Aim of this season was the excavation of Tomb A7, in the south-western sector of Area A (fig. 1), already recognized and surveyed in 2015, when its entrance was first identified.3 2. TOMB A7 Tomb A7 is quite different from the majority of the tombs in the KJ necropolis. -
Did the Phoenicians Practice Child Sacrifice?
University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Anthropology Honors College 5-2012 Analyzing Tophets: Did the Phoenicians Practice Child Sacrifice? Katelyn DiBenedetto Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_anthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation DiBenedetto, Katelyn, "Analyzing Tophets: Did the Phoenicians Practice Child Sacrifice?" (2012). Anthropology. 5. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_anthro/5 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Analyzing Tophets: Did the Phoenicians Practice Child Sacrifice? By: Katelyn DiBenedetto Undergraduate Honors Thesis: Spring 2012 Anthropology Department 2 Abstract This paper examines the controversies surrounding Phoenician religious practices and in particular, the Phoenician Tophet, a cemetery containing the cremated remains of infants and young children in clay jars. According to ancient Hebrew and Greek sources, in the ceremony known as mulk, the oldest son was placed on the arms of a bronze statue and dropped into a brazier below. Though these ancient authors were unanimous in criticizing Phoenician religious practices as cruel and savage, the use of these biased sources to conclude that child sacrifice did occur remains controversial. Both the Hebrew and Greek sources were xenophobic and furthermore, there are no Phoenician texts preserved that describe this religious practice. Hence, it is difficult to judge these rituals from a Phoenician viewpoint. Partly because of this, the interpretation of mulk and the Phoenician Tophets remains highly controversial within the academic world.