Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 BOOK 1 – PART 1 Mental HealtH CommissiOn annual RepORt 2008 inCluding tHe RepORt Of tHe inspeCtOR Of Mental HealtH seRviCes Book 1 Part 1 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 1 BOOK 1 – PART 1 the principal functions of the Mental Health Commission, as defined by the act, shall be ‘to promote, encourage and foster the establishment and maintenance of high standards and good practices in the delivery of mental health services and to take all reasonable steps to protect the interests of persons detained in approved centres under this act’. Mental Health act 2001 section 33 (1) 2 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 BOOK 1 – PART 1 Vision Working together for Quality Mental Health services Mission the Mental Health Commission is committed to ensuring the interests of those involuntarily admitted pursuant to the provisions of the Mental Health act 2001 are protected and to fostering and promoting high standards in the delivery of mental health services Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 3 BOOK 1 – PART 1 4 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 BOOK 1 – PART 1 COntents PART 1 Chairman’s Foreword 6 Introduction – Chief Executive Officer 8 Commission Members (April 2007 – 2012) (At time of appointment) 9 CHAPTER 1 11 Mental Health Commission: Functions & Structures 13 CHAPTER 2 17 Strategic Plan 2006 - 2008 19 CHAPTER 3 21 Progressing the Strategic Plan 2006 – 2008 23 PART 2 CHAPTER 4 55 National Review of Mental Health Services 2008 56 appendiCes 69 CHAPTER 5 97 Overview of Catchment Mental Health Services within HSE Area – Catchment Reports by HSE Area 97 CHAPTER 6 283 Additional Information 285 BOOKs 2-7 Report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services is available on CD-ROM (see back of report) Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 5 BOOK 1 – PART 1 CHaiRMan’s Foreword The year 2008 showed again that bringing about change in Ireland’s Mental Health Services is a most challenging task. This has been the case over the past number of years when there was additional revenue available. We can expect it to be even more challenging now that we are entering a period of great economic difficulty and exchequer shortages. As 2008 came to an end, the extent of the global and national economic difficulties had become apparent. Therefore the publication in September by the Commission of a report showing the economic benefits of investment in services to deal with mental health problems was timely. The report, The Economics of Mental Health Care in Ireland, was prepared by Eamon O’Shea and Brendan Kennelly of the Irish Centre for Social Gerontology and the Department of Economics at NUI Galway. The report showed that mental health problems cost the economy over g3 billion a year. While ultimately decisions on resource allocation are grounded in societal values, the report presented sound economic reasons as to why investment in mental health services would more than repay its cost. In other words, investment in mental health services is good for our economic well-being as well as for our health. The investment the Commission wants to see is in community treatment facilities to replace the institutional care approach. This is the core of Government policy as outlined in its policy document, A Vision for Change. While there were a number of restatements of commitment to Vision for Change, I must once again record the Commission’s disappointment at the lack of progress towards its implementation. In the introduction to the 2007 Annual Report I stated: “While acknowledging that Vision for Change involves a seven to ten year programme of change and development, the Mental Health Commission was disappointed and concerned at the absence of progress in 2007.” It is with great regret that I make the same statement again in relation to 2008. The recruitment restrictions imposed by the HSE in relation to core multidisciplinary staff has affected the ability of mental health services to meet current needs and provide a comprehensive range of evidence based therapeutic interventions to service users. The new economic realities mean we must concentrate not just on the amount that is spent on mental health services, but on how it is spent. The Commission’s Quality Framework for Mental Health Services in Ireland asserts that the systematic evaluation and review of mental health services underpinned by best practice will enable providers to deliver quality services. In the context of the Quality Framework, it is disappointing to see there was poor compliance in relation to the regulations concerning the need for individualised care plans where service users were fully involved participants. While increased funding can of course help deliver quality services, a key issue is also the governance of those services. While there are some examples of excellent audits, quality improvement measures and multidisciplinary management structures, we do not have the formal structures and processes that are needed. The ambition of Government policy is to have a national network of comprehensive, community-based multidisciplinary mental health teams. This vision is far from reality. In 2008 the Inspector of Mental Health Services found that community teams often exist at very basic levels with insufficient approved posts. In some areas he also noted strong industrial relations resistance to the moving of mental health services from old hospital based settings and into the community. The inquiry team established by the Commission continued through 2008 to prepare the report into care and treatment practices in St Michael’s Unit, South Tipperary General Hospital and St Luke’s hospital, both in Clonmel. The report itself was published in 2009 and therefore not within the period covered by this annual report. 6 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 BOOK 1 – PART 1 During 2008 the Commission’s own inspection process focussed on concerns about the care and treatment of residents in these units and the 2009 annual report will detail the steps taken by the Commission to have these concerns fully addressed in the best interests of patients. Central to this is the development of community treatment facilities that will allow the closure of institutions such as St Luke’s. At the core of a Vision for Change is the development of community based mental health multidisciplinary teams which will form the backbone of service delivery. Without this change, many service users will continue to be treated in unsuitable and outdated inpatient facilities at considerable cost to them as individuals, to the society in which they live and to the economy which suffers as a result of inadequate mental health services. The reports of the inspections of all the approved centres are published in this annual report (Books 2-7). For the first time, however, these inspection reports were published in the Mental Health Commission’s web site well before the annual report. In some cases in the past there was a gap of up to 15 months between an inspection being carried out and the final report being available to staff, service users and the general public. The policy of early publication arises from the fact that the earlier feedback is given, the quicker people will take any action required on foot of an inspection report. During the year the Commission also took a clear position against the relocation of the Central Mental Hospital to Thornton Hall in North Dublin. The Chief Executive and I accepted an invitation from the Oireachtas Committee on Health and Children to give evidence on the subject. We said that we fully supported the replacement of the current Central Mental Hospital with a purpose designed, modern facility which promotes patient safety and dignity. However we said that the proposal to build it beside a prison would promote isolation, exclusion and stigmatisation of the residents, and that there were other reasons such as inadequate public transport connections that made the site inappropriate. The Commission said there should be a comprehensive assessment of the State’s need for forensic mental health services undertaken as a priority. Over the past year, the Commission members have applied themselves to the mandate and responsibilities set out in the 2001 Mental Health Act. They have ensured that respecting and promoting the best interests of the service user was core to the decisions they reached and I thank them for fulfilling this responsibility. The work of this Commission would not have been possible without the knowledge, skill and dedication of its Executive to ensure the MHC operates in a highly effective manner, meeting the everyday challenges in a truly professional and responsive way. 2008 saw the appointment of a new Inspector of Mental Health Services, together with new appointments to the roles of Assistant Inspectors. Their professionalism and team work has resulted in a comprehensive report that will assist all stake holders’ focus their minds on the strengths and positives developments as well the weaknesses and challenges within the Irish mental Health service. Finally, the Commission would like to express its appreciation of the leadership of its CEO, Ms Bríd Clarke, who has effectively managed the operations of the MHC as an independent statutory body and ensured that the work plan for the Commission over 2008 was completed to the highest possible standard. dr. edmond O’dea Chairman Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008 7 BOOK 1 – PART 1 introduCtiOn – CHief exeCutive OffiCeR I am pleased to introduce the seventh Annual Report of the Mental Health Commission including the Report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services, for the period ending 31st December, 2008, pursuant to Section 42, Mental Health Act 2001. The year 2008 was a period of consolidation, review and development, following the full commencement of the Mental Health Act 2001 in November 2006.
Recommended publications
  • Summary of the 27Th Plenary Session, October 2003
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER- PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR- PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN _________________________ TWENTY-SEVENTH PLENARY CONFERENCE 20 and 21 OCTOBER 2003 Hanbury Manor Hotel & Country Club, Ware, Hertfordshire _______________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) (Produced by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association) Any queries should be sent to: The Editor The British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association Room 248 Parliament Buildings Stormont Belfast BT4 3XX Tel: 028 90521135 e-mail simon.burrowes@niassembly.gov.uk IN ATTENDANCE Co-Chairmen Mr Brendan Smith TD Mr David Winnick MP Members and Associate Members Mr Harry Barnes MP Mr Séamus Kirk TD Senator Paul Bradford Senator Terry Le Sueur Mr Johnny Brady TD Dr Dai Lloyd AM Rt Hon the Lord Brooke Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP of Sutton Mandeville CH Mr Andrew Mackinlay MP Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Dr John Marek AM Senator Paul Coughlan Mr Michael Mates MP Dr Jerry Cowley TD Rt Hon Sir Brian Mawhinney MP Mr Seymour Crawford TD Mr Kevin McNamara MP Dr Jimmy Devins TD Mr David Melding AM The Lord Dubs Senator Paschal Mooney Ms Helen Eadie MSP Mr Arthur Morgan TD Mr John Ellis TD Mr Alasdair Morrison MSP Mr Jeff Ennis MP Senator Francie O’Brien Ms Margaret Ewing MSP Mr William O’Brien MP Mr Paul Flynn MP Mr Donald J Gelling CBE MLC Ms Liz O’Donnell TD Mr Mike German AM Mr Ned O’Keeffe TD Mr Jim Glennon TD Mr Jim O’Keeffe TD The Lord Glentoran CBE DL Senator Ann Ormonde Mr Dominic Grieve MP Mr Séamus Pattison TD Mr John Griffiths AM Senator
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    Annual Report 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE, TRADE AND EMPLOYMENT 1 Contents Introduction by Secretary General 2 Pillar 4: Workplace Partnership & Employment Rights 31 Organisation Chart 4 Social Partnership and Industrial Relations 31 Summary of Key Activities and Employment Rights 32 Achievements in 2008 5 Employment Rights Compliance 34 Occupational Health and Safety 34 Pillar 1: Investing in Knowledge Redundancy and Insolvency Payments 35 and its Application 8 Cross-Departmental Issues 36 Science & Technology 8 Intellectual Property 13 Pillar 5: Better Business Regulation North/South 13 and the Consumer 37 Better Regulation 37 Pillar 2: Enterprise Development Policies Competition Policy 37 in a Competitive High-Value Economy 14 Consumer Policy 38 Competitiveness and Productivity 14 Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) 40 Enterprise Policy 15 Companies 40 Tax 16 Company Law (Financial Services) Unit 40 Sustainability and Environmental Challenges 16 EU Legislation on Company Law 41 Enterprise Growth 18 Friendly Societies and Industrial & Foreign Direct Investment 19 Provident Societies (Co-Operatives) 42 Entrepreneurship 20 Balanced Regional Development 21 Pillar 6: Delivery of Our Strategic Goals 43 International Trade 21 Quality Customer Service 43 North/South 25 Management Support 43 Cross-Departmental Issues 25 Financial Management 44 Human Resources Management (HRM) and Training 45 Pillar 3: Skills Supply, Enhancement Information & Communications Technology 46 and Participation in the Workforce 26 Departmental Working Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Outcomes for the 2007 and 2011 Irish Elections Under a Different Electoral System
    Publicpolicy.ie Potential Outcomes for the 2007 and 2011 Irish elections under a different electoral system. A Submission to the Convention on the Constitution. Dr Adrian Kavanagh & Noel Whelan 1 Forward Publicpolicy.ie is an independent body that seeks to make it as easy as possible for interested citizens to understand the choices involved in addressing public policy issues and their implications. Our purpose is to carry out independent research to inform public policy choices, to communicate the results of that research effectively and to stimulate constructive discussion among policy makers, civil society and the general public. In that context we asked Dr Adrian Kavanagh and Noel Whelan to undertake this study of the possible outcomes of the 2007 and 2011 Irish Dail elections if those elections had been run under a different electoral system. We are conscious that this study is being published at a time of much media and academic comment about the need for political reform in Ireland and in particular for reform of the electoral system. While this debate is not new, it has developed a greater intensity in the recent years of political and economic volatility and in a context where many assess the weaknesses in our political system and our electoral system in particular as having contributed to our current crisis. Our wish is that this study will bring an important additional dimension to discussion of our electoral system and of potential alternatives. We hope it will enable members of the Convention on the Constitution and those participating in the wider debate to have a clearer picture of the potential impact which various systems might have on the shape of the Irish party system, the proportionality of representation, the stability of governments and the scale of swings between elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 29Th Plenary Session, October 2004
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER- PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR- PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN _________________________ TWENTY-NINTH PLENARY CONFERENCE 18 and 19 October 2004 Chepstow, Monmouthshire _______________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) (Produced by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association) Suggested amendments or corrections will be considered by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association. They should be sent to: The Editor Room 248 Parliament Buildings Stormont Belfast BT4 3XX Tel: 028 90521135 e-mail: simon.burrowes@niassembly.gov.uk to arrive no later than 3 December 2004 IN ATTENDANCE CO-CHAIRMEN Mr David Winnick MP Mr Séamus Kirk TD (Acting) MEMBERS AND ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Mr Harry Barnes MP The Lord Glentoran CBE DL Senator Paschal Mooney Senator Paul Bradford Mr Dominic Grieve MP Mr Arthur Morgan TD Mr Johnny Brady TD Mr John Griffiths AM Senator Francie O’Brien Rt Hon the Lord Brooke Deputy Graham Guille Mr William O’Brien MP of Sutton Mandeville CH Senator Paul Coghlan The Baroness Harris of Richmond Mr Jim O’Keeffe TD Dr Jerry Cowley TD Senator Brian Hayes Mr Ned O’Keeffe TD Mr Bruce Crawford MSP Ms Cecilia Keaveney TD Mr Séamus Pattison TD Mr Seymour Crawford TD Mr Andy King MP Mr Chris Ruane MP Mr Tony Cunningham MP Dr Dai Lloyd AM Senator Brendan Ryan Dr Jimmy Devins TD Mr Elfyn Llwyd MP Mr Joe Sherlock TD Deputy Maurice Dubras Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP The Lord Smith of Clifton The Lord Dubs Dr John Marek AM The Lord Temple-Morris Ms Helen Eadie MSP Rt Hon Michael Mates
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Mr. Bertie Ahern Bertie.Ahern@Oireachtas.Ie 2. Mr. Dermot Ahern Dermot.Ahern@Oireachtas.Ie 3. Mr. Michael Ahern Michael.Ahern@Oireachtas.Ie 4
    1. Mr. Bertie Ahern bertie.ahern@oireachtas.ie 2. Mr. Dermot Ahern dermot.ahern@oireachtas.ie 3. Mr. Michael Ahern michael.ahern@oireachtas.ie 4. Mr. Noel Ahern noel.ahern@oireachtas.ie 5. Mr. Bernard Allen bernard.allen@oireachtas.ie 6. Mr. Chris Andrews chris.andrews@oireachtas.ie 7. Mr. Barry Andrews barry.andrews@oireachtas.ie 8. Mr. Seán Ardagh sean.ardagh@oireachtas.ie 9. Mr. Bobby Aylward bobby.aylward@oireachtas.ie 10. Mr. James Bannon james.bannon@oireachtas.ie 11. Mr. Sean Barrett sean.barrett@oireachtas.ie 12. Mr. Joe Behan joe.behan@oireachtas.ie 13. Mr. Niall Blaney niall.blaney@oireachtas.ie 14. Ms. Aíne Brady aine.brady@oireachtas.ie 15. Mr. Cyprian Brady cyprian.brady@oireachtas.ie 16. Mr. Johnny Brady johnny.brady@oireachtas.ie 17. Mr. Pat Breen pat.breen@oireachtas.ie 18. Mr. Tommy Broughan thomas.p.broughan@oireachtas.ie 19. Mr. John Browne john.browne@oireachtas.ie 20. Mr. Richard Bruton richard.bruton@oireachtas.ie 21. Mr. Ulick Burke ulick.burke@oireachtas.ie 22. Ms. Joan Burton joan.burton@oireachtas.ie 23. Ms. Catherine Byrne catherine.byrne@oireachtas.ie 24. Mr. Thomas Byrne thomas.byrne@oireachtas.ie 25. Mr. Dara Calleary dara.calleary@oireachtas.ie 26. Mr. Pat Carey pat.carey@oireachtas.ie 27. Mr. Joe Carey joe.carey@oireachtas.ie 28. Ms. Deirdre Clune deirdre.clune@oireachtas.ie 29. Mr. Niall Collins niall.collins@oireachtas.ie 30. Ms. Margaret Conlon margaret.conlon@oireachtas.ie 31. Mr. Paul Connaughton paul.connaughton@oireachtas.ie 32. Mr. Sean Connick sean.connick@oireachtas.ie 33. Mr. Noel J Coonan noel.coonan@oireachtas.ie 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 26Th Plenary Session, March 2003
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER- PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR- PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN _________________________ TWENTY-SIXTH PLENARY CONFERENCE 24 and 25 March 2003 Kilkenny Ormonde Hotel, Kilkenny _______________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) (Produced by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association) IN ATTENDANCE Co-Chairmen Mr Brendan Smith TD Mr David Winnick MP Members and Associate Members Mr Harry Barnes MP Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP Mr Henry Bellingham MP Mrs Rosemary McKenna CBE MP Mr Johnny Brady TD Mr Andrew Mackinlay MP Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mr Michael McMahon MSP Mandeville CH Mr Kevin McNamara MP Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Senator Martin Mansergh Senator Paul Coghlan Dr John Marek AM Dr Jerry Cowley TD Mr Michael Mates MP Mr Seymour Crawford TD Rt Hon Sir Brian Mawhinney MP Dr Jimmy Devins TD Senator Paschal Mooney The Lord Dubs Mr Arthur Morgan TD Mr John Ellis TD Senator Francie O’Brien Mr Damien English TD Mr William O’Brien MP Mr Jeff Ennis MP Ms Liz O’Donnell TD Mrs Margaret Ewing MSP Mr Jim O’Keeffe TD Mr Donald J Gelling CBE MLC Senator Mary O’Rourke Mr Brian Gibbons AM The Lord Glentoran CBE DL Mr Séamus Pattison TD Mr Dominic Grieve MP Mr Chris Ruane MP Mr John Griffiths AM Mr David Ruffley MP Senator Brian Hayes Mr Alex Salmond MP Mr John Hume MP Mr Joe Sherlock TD Ms Helen Jackson MP The Lord Smith of Clifton Ms Cecilia Keaveney TD Mr Iain Smith MSP Mr Tony Killeen TD Mr Jamie Stone MSP Mr Séamus Kirk TD The Lord Temple-Morris Mr Conor Lenihan TD Mr Gareth Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Sligo County Council Annual Report 2003 | Comhairle Chontae Shligigh Tuarascáil Bhliantúil 2003
    SLIGO COUNTY COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2003 Sligo County Council Annual Report Comhairle Chontae Shligigh Tuarascáil Bhliantúil 2003 | COMHAIRLE CHONTAE SHLIGIGH TUARASCÁIL BHLIANTÚIL 2003 COMHAIRLE CHONTAE Sligo County Council Comhairle Chontae Shligigh County Hall Riverside Sligo Ireland T: +353 (0)71 91 29800 F: +353 (0)71 91 41119 E: info@sligococo.ie W: www.sligococo.ie SLIGO COUNTY COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2003 | COMHAIRLE CHONTAE SHLIGIGH TUARASCÁIL BHLIANTÚIL 2003 Contents CONTENTS Cathaoirleach’s Introduction 2 County Manager’s Foreword 3 Council Members v Map of Electoral Area 4 Strategic Policy Committee Members 6 Housing and Building 7 Road Transportation and Safety 10 Bridge Restoration and Repairs v Harbour Improvements 12 Planning and Development 14 Environmental Services 17 Rural Water Programme 24 Capital Water Projects v Small Sewerage Schemes 25 Arts Office 26 Community and Enterprise 28 County Sligo Civil Defence 33 Communications v Freedom of Information 34 County Sligo Library Service 35 Tubbercurry One Stop Shop 38 Partnership v Higher Education Grants v Register of Electors / Motor Taxation Office 40 Sligo Fire Authority 41 Special Projects Office 43 Human Resources 46 County Sligo Heritage Office 50 Conferences and Seminars 52 Information Technology 53 Cathaoirleach’s Year Photo Diary 54 Sligo County Council Staff 56 Financial Statement 57 Performance Indicators 59 Sligo County Council Comhairle Chontae Shligigh County Hall, Riverside, Sligo, Ireland T: +353 (0)71 9129800 F: +353 (0)71 9141119 E: info@sligococo.ie W: www.sligococo.ie Photocopying prohibited by law. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the permission of Sligo County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th Annual Report, 2004
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR-PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN NINTH ANNUAL REPORT No. 104 — March 2005 THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY BODY Introduction 1. This is the ninth Annual Report of the Body since it was decided at the 11th Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. The current Report summarises the work of the Body in 2004. Membership of the Body 2. A reshuffle in the Irish Government in October, which included the appointment of Mr Brendan Smith, TD, formerly Co-Chair, Mr Conor Lenihan, TD, and Mr Tony Killeen, TD, as Ministers resulted in a number of changes in the Irish delegation. Mr Pat Carey, TD, replaced Mr Brendan Smith, TD, as Co-Chair and Mr Seymour Crawford replaced Mr Jim O'Keeffe, TD, on the Steering Committee. Senator Diarmuid Wilson became a full member and Mr John Carty, TD, Mr Trevor Sargent, TD, and Senator Michael Kitt were new appointments. In the delegation from Jersey, Deputy Maurice Dubras replaced Senator Walker as the full member of the Body. Political Developments 3. The Northern Ireland Executive and Assembly remained suspended throughout 2004. From the beginning of the year, the British and Irish Governments engaged in intensive efforts to move the process forward and restore the power sharing institutions. 4. The review of the operation of the Good Friday Agreement, was formally launched on 3 February and regular meetings were held between February and September. The review was provided for within the terms of the Agreement itself and both Governments stressed that while the operation of the Agreement would be reviewed, its fundamentals would not be renegotiated.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation, Dr
    Parliamentary Fellowship of The Houses of the Oireachtas Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Dr. Brian Hunt The Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Parliamentary Fellowship of the Houses of the Oireachtas Dr. Brian Hunt The Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Dr. Brian Hunt Solicitor, BA, MLitt Inaugural Parliamentary Fellow of the Houses of the Oireachtas (2009 - 2010) Prepared in fulfilment of the award of the Inaugural Parliamentary Fellowship (2009 – 2010) at the Houses of the Oireachtas. Submitted to the Houses of the Oireachtas on 17th December 2010. Dr. Brian Hunt Preface Purpose of the Monograph The scrutiny of legislation is arguably one of the most important roles discharged by the Houses of the Oireachtas. This monograph aims to examine, for the first time, the various elements and features of the political system which have some impact on the ability of the Houses to scrutinise legislation, and to assess whether the requirements of the Constitution, as regards scrutinising and enacting legislation, are fulfilled by the current arrangements. In this way, it is hoped that this monograph contributes to scholarship on the Houses of the Oireachtas and advances the knowledge and understanding of the workings of the Houses, particularly in regard to their role in scrutinising legislation. Outline of Monograph The scrutiny of legislation is one of the key roles served by any legislature and its importance in an Irish context derives from Article 15.2.1 of the Constitution which provides that the sole and exclusive power of making laws is vested in the Oireachtas.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints and Resistance to the Wave of Democratic Reforms in Ireland Since 2011
    Camille Bedock (European University Institute of Florence) Conference 'Political Legitimacy and the Paradox of Regulation', January 24-25, 2013, Leiden Workshop: Crowd-pleasers or key janglers? The impact of drops in political legitimacy on democratic reform and their consequences Institutional muffling: constraints and resistance to the wave of democratic reforms in Ireland since 2011 Ireland has been one of the European countries in which the economic crisis struck more severely since 2009, with far-reaching economic, social, but also political consequences for the country, such as the virtual annihilation of the economic sovereignty of the country for a decade following the EU-IMF bailout. This meant that the ability to deliver output-legitimacy (Scharpf 1999) for Irish political parties was severely pruned. Moreover, the decline in political support for the institutions and the political actors plummeted since 2007, turning Ireland into one of the European countries where the level of distrust of institutions and parties is the highest. As a result of the mobilization of various actors of the civil society to promote a more democratic and transparent political system, the issue of “political reforms” has been put at the forefront of the campaign of 2011 for all major political parties, with a strong emphasis with the will to empower citizens and prevent future crisis by reforming Irish governance. A number of promises were made after the new Fine Gael- Labour coalition came into power, including the abolition of the upper House (the Seanad) and the creation of a Constitutional convention that would discuss a number of institutional provisions including the electoral system, the presidential term, gay marriage, or voting age.
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Institiúid Ard-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath
    Institiúid Ard-Léinn Bhaile Átha Cliath tuAiRisc BhliAntúil 2009 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies AnnuAl RepoRt 2009 Clár Ábhair réamhrá an chathaoirligh 3 scoil an léinn cheiltigh 7 scoil na fisice cosmaí 13 scoil na fisice teoiriciúla 33 riarachán agus Airgeadas 41 An fhoireann 42 ráitis Airgeadais 66 Contents chairman’s introduction 2 school of celtic studies 6 school of cosmic Physics 12 school of theoretical Physics 32 Administration and finance 40 staff 42 financial statements 46 Chairman’s Introduction the Dublin institute for Advanced studies (DiAs) has arranged the quinntennial review of the three schools. the significantly increased its international profile in recent council commissioned international review Panels to assess, years and will continue to develop overseas links pursuing using accepted international standards, the research work opportunities for growth through collaboration and high of the DiAs schools. the chairmen of the review Panels impact publishing. the scientists and scholars of the institute were: tomás Ó cathasaigh, henry l. shattuck Professor of are well capable of seeing the potential application of new irish studies, harvard university, usA (*celtic studies*); technologies and work collaboratively to make progress Professor thijs de Graauw, AlMA observatory, chile, and possible by raising awareness and understanding of the observatory of the university of leiden, the netherlands role and value of the physical sciences. We can through (*cosmic physics*); Professor Juerg froehlich nobel science both in cosmic Physics and in theoretical Physics laureate eidgenossische technische hochschule, Zurich, and in the humanities through the school of celtic studies switzerland (*theoretical physics*). be of influence and relevance to the ireland we serve the council is indebted to the members of the review especially through our strong relations with the universities Panels and appreciates their commitment to the task and and other third level institutes to whom we willingly share especially their observations and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Hare Coursing and Fox Hunting, You Are in the Majority of the Electorate
    Dear Voter, Thank you for taking the time to read our "Irish Politicians and Animal Issues" booklet. If you care about animals and are opposed to the cruelty of activities such as hare coursing and fox hunting, you are in the majority of the electorate. Despite most Irish people wanting cruelty ended, some politicians ignore this and shamelessly work to defend those involved in terrorising, injuring and killing wildlife. In the following pages, you will see where politicians stand. If TDs in your constituency have spoken in favour of cruelty in the past, please contact them now. Encourage them to respect the wishes of the majority and reconsider their stance. How you and your family vote in the next election will help determine if Ireland's next government is one which chooses to protect animals or protect animal abusers. Before you cast your vote, consider the views of each of the candidates. If particular candidates are not included in this booklet, question them directly. We also recommend watching our "Politicians" playlist at www.youtube.com/icabs We believe that Ireland will only ever achieve true greatness, when foxhunting, hare coursing and all forms of cruelty are permanently abolished here. On election day, please choose compassion over cruelty. Thank you. Irish Council Against Blood Sports www.banbloodsports.com The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated ~ Gandhi TDs listed alphabetically Bannon, James . .09 Cowen, Barry . .36 Flanagan, Terence . .64 Barrett, Seán . .10 Creed, Michael . .37 Fleming, Sean . .65 Barry, Tom .
    [Show full text]