Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation, Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation, Dr Parliamentary Fellowship of The Houses of the Oireachtas Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Dr. Brian Hunt The Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Parliamentary Fellowship of the Houses of the Oireachtas Dr. Brian Hunt The Role of the Houses of the Oireachtas in the Scrutiny of Legislation Dr. Brian Hunt Solicitor, BA, MLitt Inaugural Parliamentary Fellow of the Houses of the Oireachtas (2009 - 2010) Prepared in fulfilment of the award of the Inaugural Parliamentary Fellowship (2009 – 2010) at the Houses of the Oireachtas. Submitted to the Houses of the Oireachtas on 17th December 2010. Dr. Brian Hunt Preface Purpose of the Monograph The scrutiny of legislation is arguably one of the most important roles discharged by the Houses of the Oireachtas. This monograph aims to examine, for the first time, the various elements and features of the political system which have some impact on the ability of the Houses to scrutinise legislation, and to assess whether the requirements of the Constitution, as regards scrutinising and enacting legislation, are fulfilled by the current arrangements. In this way, it is hoped that this monograph contributes to scholarship on the Houses of the Oireachtas and advances the knowledge and understanding of the workings of the Houses, particularly in regard to their role in scrutinising legislation. Outline of Monograph The scrutiny of legislation is one of the key roles served by any legislature and its importance in an Irish context derives from Article 15.2.1 of the Constitution which provides that the sole and exclusive power of making laws is vested in the Oireachtas. In view of the primacy of the Houses’ role in making laws, this monograph seeks to examine the diverse factors which enhance or impede the ability of Members of the Houses to adequately scrutinise legislation. This monograph also examines a range of reforms and initiatives of recent years which have invariably served to enhance the ability of Deputies and Senators to scrutinise legislation more effectively. Separately, this monograph also examines the arrangements which are in place to scrutinise EU legislation and also secondary legislation. In what is perhaps its most novel feature, through an analysis of parliamentary debates, this monograph seeks to shed some light on: • The amount of parliamentary time which is spent scrutinising legislation; • The length of time it takes for a Bill to move through the Houses; • The extent to which opposition amendments are accepted/rejected; • The degree to which members on all sides of the Houses actively participate in the task of scrutiny. This monograph finds that, having regard to the requirements of the Constitution, the Standing Orders of the Houses, and current practice as evidenced by the record of parliamentary debates, the degree of scrutiny to which legislation is subjected by the Houses is not as effective as it could otherwise be. In that context, the monograph goes on to identify some initiatives which would enhance the ability of members of the Houses to scrutinise legislation. Scope of the Monograph This monograph is primarily concerned with the scrutiny of primary legislation by both Houses of the Oireachtas. There is some limited examination of the extent to which legislative measures emanating from the EU institutions are scrutinised and the scrutiny of secondary legislation is also addressed. The role of the Houses in scrutinising Private Members Bills is not examined, nor is the scrutiny of Private Bills. In several instances, the monograph seeks to reflect the practices and experiences of other comparable jurisdictions. Methodology This monograph is based on a reading of an extensive body materials including books, articles and official reports. A considerable degree of reliance has been placed on research conducted using the records of debates of both Houses. Data has been presented in Chapter 9 and is based on an examination of sample dates and a sample of Acts over a set period. In addition, the monograph has been considerably enhanced through discussions and engagement which I have had with current and former members of the Houses, as well as with senior officials at the Houses. The monograph also benefits from my knowledge of the parliamentary and legislative process gleaned whilst working in the Office of the Attorney General and more recently whilst working in Leinster House. i Preface A Personal Note Having previously studied legislation in great detail in the course of my PhD thesis - which focussed on the fruit of the legislative process - that I should then turn, in this monograph, to study how legislation is scrutinised and made, seems to complement my earlier research. It has been a fascinating topic to examine and I am indebted to the Parliamentary Fellowship Committee of the Houses of the Oireachtas for awarding the Inaugural Parliamentary Fellowship on this, my chosen topic. It has been an honour to have been chosen and my only hope is that this monograph is seen as being true to the objectives of the Parliamentary Fellowship. The preparation of this monograph has taken twelve months, and its completion would not have been possible without the assistance of many people. Firstly, I would like to thank Mr Justice Gerard Hogan who, up until his appointment to the High Court Bench in September 2010, acted as my supervisor for this monograph. I am particularly grateful to former Tánaiste and Minister for Justice, Michael McDowell S.C. who agreed to take over as my supervisor. The monograph has benefited greatly from their guidance and wisdom. From the outset, former Taoiseach, the late Dr Garret FitzGerald, a member of the Parliamentary Fellowship Committee at the Houses, showed immense enthusiasm for the subject-matter of this monograph which was truly inspiring. I am indebted to Maria Fitzsimons, Head of Research at the Houses of the Oireachtas who has expertly steered this project to completion. Thanks are also due to Madelaine Dennison, Head of Library and Research Service as well as the staff of the Library and Research Service at the Houses of the Oireachtas. I would like to also thank the members of the Houses who gave so generously of their time to me in agreeing to be interviewed for the purpose of my research. They include: former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern; former Government Chief Whip and Minister of State, John Curran; former Government Chief Whip, Tom Kitt; former Fine Gael whip (now Government Chief Whip) Paul Kehoe TD; and Labour Party whip, Emmet Stagg TD. The Assistant Clerk of the Dáil, Dick Caffrey, was also of particular assistance. As ever, renowned UK expert in statute law, Francis Bennion provided invaluable insights and I would also like to thank Gay Mitchell MEP and Professor William Binchy. I would also like to thank my colleagues at Zurich, in particular Arno Wicki and Chris Davidson, both of whom were very supportive of my involvement with the Fellowship. I owe a particular debt of gratitude to Henry Murdoch whose forbearance has allowed me to defer my work on updating Murdoch’s Dictionary of Irish Law so as to concentrate on completing this monograph. I would also like to thank my parents for their continued support and encouragement. I would like to thank my wife Natallia, who, as ever, has been so supportive of my involvement with the Fellowship and the inevitable time sacrifices required. Finally, in so far as it is appropriate to dedicate a monograph, this is dedicated to our wonderful children - Ryísa and Dara. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .......................................................... i REASONS FOR SIGNIFICANT LEVEL OF CONSTITUENCY WORK Chapter 1 • Re-Election • Transferable Vote Legislation and the Requirement • Centralised Model of Power for Scrutiny ................................................... 1 • Intra-Party Competition • Public Expectation • Gap in the Market TASK OF LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY • What Constitutes Scrutiny? ELECTORATE’S NON-RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENT • Article 15.2.1 of the Constitution ON NATIONAL STAGE • Article 15.2.1 and the E.U. • Article 15.2.1 and Secondary Legislation USING THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM TO ENHANCE SCRUTINY • Article 15.2.1 and the Role of Judiciary in Law-Making • Other Electoral Systems • Views of Members of the Houses NON-JUSTICIABILITY AND THE SCRUTINY • Options for Change OF LEGISLATION • Whether a New Approach Would Enhance Scrutiny ROLE OF THE PRESIDENT IN SCRUTINISING LEGISLATION Chapter 3 LEGISLATION Features of the Parliamentary System • What is legislation? Which Impact Upon Scrutiny ........................ 23 • Policy Development and Scrutiny • Government Priorities • Programme for Government INTRODUCTION • Legislation Programme • Order Paper POLITICAL PARTIES • Order of Business • Preparation of Legislation WHIP SYSTEM • Role of the Bills’ Office • Legislative Process and Standing Orders OPPOSITION NUMBER OF TDS Chapter 2 SCHEDULING OF LEGISLATION Electoral System and its Impact Upon the Level of Scrutiny .......................... 11 DECISIONS OF THE HOUSES PARLIAMENTARY GUILLOTINE INTRODUCTION • Introduction • Danger of Rushed Legislation ROLE OF TDS AND SENATORS • Early Examples of the Guillotine’s Use • Recent Examples of its Use ELECTORAL SYSTEM • Reasons for Using the Guillotine • Current Electoral System • Abridged Legislative Process • Proportionality • Rushing of Legislation at the End of a Session • Connectivity • View from the Houses • Turnover • Legal Position ELECTORAL SYSTEM & FOCUS
Recommended publications
  • Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922
    Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act, 1922 CONSTITUTION OF THE IRISH FREE STATE (SAORSTÁT EIREANN) ACT, 1922. AN ACT TO ENACT A CONSTITUTION FOR THE IRISH FREE STATE (SAORSTÁT EIREANN) AND FOR IMPLEMENTING THE TREATY BETWEEN GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND SIGNED AT LONDON ON THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1921. DÁIL EIREANN sitting as a Constituent Assembly in this Provisional Parliament, acknowledging that all lawful authority comes from God to the people and in the confidence that the National life and unity of Ireland shall thus be restored, hereby proclaims the establishment of The Irish Free State (otherwise called Saorstát Eireann) and in the exercise of undoubted right, decrees and enacts as follows:— 1. The Constitution set forth in the First Schedule hereto annexed shall be the Constitution of The Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann). 2. The said Constitution shall be construed with reference to the Articles of Agreement for a Treaty between Great Britain and Ireland set forth in the Second Schedule hereto annexed (hereinafter referred to as “the Scheduled Treaty”) which are hereby given the force of law, and if any provision of the said Constitution or of any amendment thereof or of any law made thereunder is in any respect repugnant to any of the provisions of the Scheduled Treaty, it shall, to the extent only of such repugnancy, be absolutely void and inoperative and the Parliament and the Executive Council of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) shall respectively pass such further legislation and do all such other things as may be necessary to implement the Scheduled Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament Should Return to a 'Dual Mandate' System
    The European Parliament should return to a ‘dual mandate’ system which uses national politicians as representatives instead of directly elected MEPs blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2014/06/16/the-european-parliament-should-return-to-a-dual-mandate-system- which-uses-national-politicians-as-representatives-instead-of-directly-elected-meps/ 16/06/2014 One of the key criticisms of European Parliament elections is that low turnout prevents the Parliament from genuinely being able to confer legitimacy on the EU’s legislative process. Herman Lelieveldt writes that while there was a small increase in turnout in the 2014 European elections, the overall trend of declining turnout necessitates a radical reform to improve the EU’s democratic legitimacy. He suggests returning to a ‘dual mandate’ system through which national parliaments appoint a proportion of their members to split time between the European Parliament and the national level. With a turnout that was only slightly higher than five years ago and a general consensus that many of the dissatisfied voters stayed home, the new European Parliament continues the paradoxical trend of declining legitimacy despite a systematic increase in its powers over the last decades. If it comes to mobilising more voters it is safe to conclude that the experiment with the Spitzenkandidat has been an utter failure. Apart from maybe in Germany, the contest did not generate much excitement in the member states nor did it bring more voters to the polls. Hence we are left with another election in which a majority of the member states (17 out of the 28) saw turn-out again decline, as shown in the Chart below.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ireland Progress Report Year 1 June 2018 — June 2019
    Global Ireland Progress Report Year 1 June 2018 — June 2019 Global Ireland Progress Report Year 1 (June 2018-June 2019) Prepared by the Department of the Taoiseach July 2019 www.gov.ie/globalireland 2 Global Ireland Progress Report, Year 1 Table of Contents Foreword 4 Progress Overview 5 Investing in Ireland’s global footprint 9 Expanding and deepening Ireland’s global footprint 12 Connecting with the wider world 26 International Development, Peace and Security 34 3 Global Ireland Progress Report, Year 1 Foreword Global Ireland is an expression of Ireland’s ambition about what we want to accomplish on the international stage, and how we believe we can contribute in a positive way to the world we live in. Within the EU, we are working to broaden and deepen our strategic and economic partnerships with other regions and partner countries, across Africa, Asia-Pacific, the Americas and the Middle East, as well as in our near European neighbourhood. We believe in the multilateral system, with the United Nations and the World Trade Organisation at its core, and we see it as the best way to protect our national interests and progress our international objectives. Last June, we launched Global Ireland, a strategic initiative to double Ireland’s global footprint and impact by 2025. When I first announced this initiative, I recalled the words of Taoiseach John A. Costello in 1948, when he expressed a hope that Ireland could wield an influence in the world ‘far in excess of what our mere physical size and the smallness of our population might warrant’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Soccer Split: a Reflection of the Politics of Ireland? Cormac
    1 The Irish Soccer Split: A Reflection of the Politics of Ireland? Cormac Moore, BCOMM., MA Thesis for the Degree of Ph.D. De Montfort University Leicester July 2020 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements P. 4 County Map of Ireland Outlining Irish Football Association (IFA) Divisional Associations P. 5 Glossary of Abbreviations P. 6 Abstract P. 8 Introduction P. 10 Chapter One – The Partition of Ireland (1885-1925) P. 25 Chapter Two – The Growth of Soccer in Ireland (1875-1912) P. 53 Chapter Three – Ireland in Conflict (1912-1921) P. 83 Chapter Four – The Split and its Aftermath (1921-32) P. 111 Chapter Five – The Effects of Partition on Other Sports (1920-30) P. 149 Chapter Six – The Effects of Partition on Society (1920-25) P. 170 Chapter Seven – International Sporting Divisions (1918-2020) P. 191 Conclusion P. 208 Endnotes P. 216 Sources and Bibliography P. 246 3 Appendices P. 277 4 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my two supervisors Professor Martin Polley and Professor Mike Cronin. Both were of huge assistance throughout the whole process. Martin was of great help in advising on international sporting splits, and inputting on the focus, outputs, structure and style of the thesis. Mike’s vast knowledge of Irish history and sporting history, and his ability to see history through many different perspectives were instrumental in shaping the thesis as far more than a sports history one. It was through conversations with Mike that the concept of looking at partition from many different viewpoints arose. I would like to thank Professor Oliver Rafferty SJ from Boston College for sharing his research on the Catholic Church, Dr Dónal McAnallen for sharing his research on the GAA and Dr Tom Hunt for sharing his research on athletics and cycling.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Living Institutions EU Cross-Border Co-Operation After the Good Friday Agreement Brigid Laffan Diane Payne Institute for British-Irish Studies, UCD
    A Report for the Centre for Cross Border Studies Creating Living Institutions EU Cross-Border Co-operation after the Good Friday Agreement Brigid Laffan Diane Payne Institute for British-Irish Studies, UCD May 2001 Creating Living Institutions EU Cross-Border Co-operation after the Good Friday Agreement Brigid Laffan Diane Payne May 2001 1 About the Authors Professor Brigid Laffan (Institute for British-Irish Studies) is a specialist in public policy making and in the policy process of the European Union. She is in the process of completing a study on the management of EU business in Dublin. This work will be published as a Trinity Blue Paper entitled “Organising for a Changing Europe: Irish Central Government and the European Union” in 2001. Dr Diane Payne (Institute for British-Irish Studies) has completed a major research project which focused on the EU structural funds policy decision making process in Ireland and examined the nature of multilevel policy making process therein. More recently she has completed a second research project which focused on local and regional economic policy making in the UK. The Institute for British-Irish Studies (IBIS) was founded in 1999 and is based in the Department of Politics at University College Dublin. The main aims of the Institute are: to promote and conduct academic research in the area of relations between the two major traditions on the island of Ireland, and between Ireland and Great Britain; to promote and encourage collaboration with academic bodies and with individual researchers elsewhere who share an interest in the exploration of relations between different national, ethnic or racial groups; to promote contact with policy makers and opinion formers outside the university sector, and to ensure a free flow of ideas between the academic and the non- academic worlds; and to contribute to public debate and public awareness of the evolving relations between communities within the island of Ireland and between Ireland and Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland: Managing R COVID-19 Across Open Borders ESSAY SPECIAL ISSUE Katy Hayward *
    Borders in Globalization Review Volume 2, Issue 1 (Fall/Winter 2020): 58-61 https://doi.org/10.18357/bigr21202019887 Northern Ireland: Managing _ R COVID-19 Across Open Borders ESSAY SPECIAL ISSUE Katy Hayward * The early response to the coronavirus pandemic in Northern Ireland revealed three things. First, although part of the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland is integrally connected in very practical ways to the Republic of Ireland. Policies and practices regarding COVID-19 on the southern side of the Irish land border had a direct impact on those being formu- lated for the North. Secondly, as well as differences in scientific advice and political preferences in the bordering jurisdictions, a coherent policy response was delayed by leaders’ failures to communicate in a timely manner with counterparts on the other side of the border. And, thirdly, different policies on either side of an open border can fuel profound uncertainty in a borderland region; but this can give rise to community-level action that fills the gaps in ways that can actually better respond to the complexity of the situation. This essay draws on the author’s close observation of events as they happened, including news coverage, press conferences and public statements from the three governments concerned over the period of March-October 2020. The Land and Sea Borders Before COVID-19 Northern Ireland is a small region on the north-eastern UK Government in Westminster. Although Northern part of the island of Ireland that is part of the United Ireland is part of the UK’s National Health Service, Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999
    TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE To be purchased through any bookseller, or directly from the GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, SUN ALLIANCE HOUSE, MOLESWORTH STREET, DUBLIN 2 £12.00 €15.24 © Copyright Government of Ireland 2000 ISBN 0-7076-6434-9 P. 33331/E Gr. 30-01 7/00 3,000 Brunswick Press Ltd. ii CLÁR CONTENTS Page Foreword........................................................................................................................................................................ v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... vii LOCAL AUTHORITIES County Councils Carlow...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Cavan....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Clare ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Cork (Northern Division) .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Cork (Southern Division).........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Candidates Who Have Pledged to Protect the Lowest Paid
    GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES WHO HAVE PLEDGED TO PROTECT THE LOWEST PAID Carlow / Kilkenny Dublin West Kathleen Funchion, Sinn Féin Paul Donnelly, Sinn Féin John Cassin, Sinn Féin Joe Higgins, ULA Des Hurley, Labour Patrick Nulty, Labour Ann Phelan, Labour Mick Finnegan, Workers’ Party Conor MacLiam, ULA Patrick Nulty, Labour Joan Burton, Labour Cavan / Monaghan Caoimhghin O’Caolain, Dun Laoghaire Sinn Féin Richard Boyd Barrett, ULA Kathryn Reilly, Sinn Féin Ivana Bacik, Labour Liam Hogan, Labour Eamon Gilmore, Labour Clare Galway East Michael McNamara, Labour Colm Keavney, Labour Trevor O’Clochartaigh, Sinn Féin Cork East Sandra McLellan, Sinn Féin Kerry North / West Limerick John Mulvihill, Labour Arthur John Spring, Labour Sean Sherlock, Labour Martin Ferris, Sinn Féin Cork North Central Kerry South Jonathan O’Brien, Sinn Féin Marie Maloney, Labour John Gilroy, Labour Ted Tynan, Workers’ Party Kildare North Kathleen Lynch, Labour Emmet Stagg, Labour Mick Barry, ULA Martin Kelly, Sinn Féin John McGinley, Labour Cork North West Catherine Murphy, Independent Des O’Grady, Sinn Féin Martin Coughlan, Labour Kildare South Ann Foley, ULA Jack Wall, Labour Jason Turner, Sinn Féin Cork South Ciaran Lynch, Labour Laois / Offaly Brian Stanley, Sinn Féin Cork South Central John Whelan, Labour Paula Desmond, Labour Joe Leddin, Labour Chris O’Leary, Sinn Féin Ray Fitzpatrick, ULA Cork South West Limerick City Paul Hayes, Sinn Féin Maurice Quinlivan, Sinn Féin Michael McCarthy, Labour Cian Prenderville, ULA Jan O’Sullivan, Labour Donegal North East
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 27Th Plenary Session, October 2003
    BRITISH-IRISH INTER- PARLIAMENTARY BODY COMHLACHT IDIR- PHARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA hÉIREANN _________________________ TWENTY-SEVENTH PLENARY CONFERENCE 20 and 21 OCTOBER 2003 Hanbury Manor Hotel & Country Club, Ware, Hertfordshire _______________________ OFFICIAL REPORT (Final Revised Edition) (Produced by the British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association) Any queries should be sent to: The Editor The British-Irish Parliamentary Reporting Association Room 248 Parliament Buildings Stormont Belfast BT4 3XX Tel: 028 90521135 e-mail [email protected] IN ATTENDANCE Co-Chairmen Mr Brendan Smith TD Mr David Winnick MP Members and Associate Members Mr Harry Barnes MP Mr Séamus Kirk TD Senator Paul Bradford Senator Terry Le Sueur Mr Johnny Brady TD Dr Dai Lloyd AM Rt Hon the Lord Brooke Rt Hon Andrew Mackay MP of Sutton Mandeville CH Mr Andrew Mackinlay MP Mr Alistair Carmichael MP Dr John Marek AM Senator Paul Coughlan Mr Michael Mates MP Dr Jerry Cowley TD Rt Hon Sir Brian Mawhinney MP Mr Seymour Crawford TD Mr Kevin McNamara MP Dr Jimmy Devins TD Mr David Melding AM The Lord Dubs Senator Paschal Mooney Ms Helen Eadie MSP Mr Arthur Morgan TD Mr John Ellis TD Mr Alasdair Morrison MSP Mr Jeff Ennis MP Senator Francie O’Brien Ms Margaret Ewing MSP Mr William O’Brien MP Mr Paul Flynn MP Mr Donald J Gelling CBE MLC Ms Liz O’Donnell TD Mr Mike German AM Mr Ned O’Keeffe TD Mr Jim Glennon TD Mr Jim O’Keeffe TD The Lord Glentoran CBE DL Senator Ann Ormonde Mr Dominic Grieve MP Mr Séamus Pattison TD Mr John Griffiths AM Senator
    [Show full text]
  • The Scrutiny of the Principle of Subsidiarity in the Procedures and Reasoned Opinions of the Italian Chamber and Senate
    11 The Scrutiny of the Principle of Subsidiarity in the Procedures and Reasoned Opinions of the Italian Chamber and Senate NICOLA LUPO I. Introduction National parliaments are generally institutions with a long history, strong proce- dural traditions and differing dynamics both externally (with their national gov- ernment as well as EU institutions, and of course with the other House, in the case of bicameral systems) and internally (ie between majority and opposition and between plenary and committees). Hence, a new procedure, like the scrutiny of the principle of subsidiarity, introduced at the EU level, does not fall on a blank page. On the contrary, it is inevitably embedded in the life of each parliament, being transformed and adapted to comply — as does naturally happen in a ‘ compos- ite ’ Constitution 1 — not only with EU requirements but also with the constraints established by each national Constitution. That is why the way in which the EWM develops in each national parliament depends on a series of elements that are typical of each constitutional system, such as the form of government, the political and institutional culture, the approach towards European integration, the confi guration of parliamentary groups and standing committees, and sometimes even the role of parliamentary bureaucracy. 2 1 For this expression and for its meaning see L Besselink , A Composite European Constitution ( Groningen , Europa Law Publishing , 2007 ) . 2 N Lupo , ‘ National Parliaments in the European integration process: re-aligning politics and poli- cies ’ in M Cartabia , N Lupo and A Simoncini (eds), Democracy and subsidiarity in the EU. National parliaments, regions and civil society in the decision-making process ( B o l o g n a , I l m u l i n o , 2 0 1 3 ) 1 0 7 – 3 2 , spec 130 (arguing that these elements could be deemed as part of the constitutional identity of each Member State).
    [Show full text]
  • Election 1987
    .) ISSUE No. 117 MARCH 1987 PRICE 30p ELECTION 1987 ,... ! Emmet Stagg TD. with supporters at Maynooth Polling Station. Bernard Durkan T.D. with supporters at Maynooth Polling Station Having a Party? . Contact Pat6p O'BpisR . Gatcvlufi Go.btd. "WOODVILLE", PAGESTOWN, MAYNOOTH. PHONE: 286566 Hire all your requirements from us (Delph/Cutlery/Glass/Table Linen etc.) COLD* PLATTERS-* * MEAT· SALADS. DESSERTS. ROLLS OR GIVE YOURSELF A TREA T AND LET US LOOK AFTER ALL YOUR CA TERING - ALL WE REQUIRE IS A BUILDING! how Maynooth is to develop over the " open .1l(l'~~ pub!it'.!l i(l!1 "ilL! \\;I ! Editorial next three years. Now is the time to put I! l' :1 er,lll \ L,IIT\' ,111 \ ' 1ll, l[l'Ii,f, , li bm;il l'd these ideas to the test. There are over ~o it , "dlb jl,( t to th\.' I.t \\"" , d thc I.u :d sixty organisations in Maynooth at the ,l Id t il cd ito,i,t/ jlldgl' !1H'1l1. ;lii, i il d ~,: moment. Many Maynooth people con­ men l is l')' crci,ul by 111 ,' I dilOr i,ti Cl' lll La Feile Padraig tribute to a considerable proportion of rl1:1lt' /.' in order in pI l''-.t'l \'(,.' 1 ill' !n th.' these organisations and do an excellent pcndl'ncl' .lnd b,II,lncl' III ihl.' N('w,"' II ,". Maynooth may not be unique in the job. On the Community Council we need '1 hl' Committec Il',',I Yl', till' I i,~ilt ;" world as one of our globe trotting resid­ people who are not weighed down with ;li ll'l, ,Ibridgl' 0 1 o lll it 11 ;,lt<: I I,, 1 ",I,',iI ents, Seamus Smyth, explains in this commit ments to sixty committees all in it> opinio" l1ligill 1'(' nell'l :hl' New, edition, however we will be unique in meeting on the same night.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    Annual Report 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE, TRADE AND EMPLOYMENT 1 Contents Introduction by Secretary General 2 Pillar 4: Workplace Partnership & Employment Rights 31 Organisation Chart 4 Social Partnership and Industrial Relations 31 Summary of Key Activities and Employment Rights 32 Achievements in 2008 5 Employment Rights Compliance 34 Occupational Health and Safety 34 Pillar 1: Investing in Knowledge Redundancy and Insolvency Payments 35 and its Application 8 Cross-Departmental Issues 36 Science & Technology 8 Intellectual Property 13 Pillar 5: Better Business Regulation North/South 13 and the Consumer 37 Better Regulation 37 Pillar 2: Enterprise Development Policies Competition Policy 37 in a Competitive High-Value Economy 14 Consumer Policy 38 Competitiveness and Productivity 14 Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) 40 Enterprise Policy 15 Companies 40 Tax 16 Company Law (Financial Services) Unit 40 Sustainability and Environmental Challenges 16 EU Legislation on Company Law 41 Enterprise Growth 18 Friendly Societies and Industrial & Foreign Direct Investment 19 Provident Societies (Co-Operatives) 42 Entrepreneurship 20 Balanced Regional Development 21 Pillar 6: Delivery of Our Strategic Goals 43 International Trade 21 Quality Customer Service 43 North/South 25 Management Support 43 Cross-Departmental Issues 25 Financial Management 44 Human Resources Management (HRM) and Training 45 Pillar 3: Skills Supply, Enhancement Information & Communications Technology 46 and Participation in the Workforce 26 Departmental Working Environment
    [Show full text]