DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Draft Design Considerations for Post Natural Disaster (Fire) On-Ground Assessment of Status of Species, Ecological Communities, Habitats and Threats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Draft Design Considerations for Post Natural Disaster (Fire) On-Ground Assessment of Status of Species, Ecological Communities, Habitats and Threats Kangaroo Island glossy black-cockatoo at a breeding site that escaped the Jan 2020 fires. Photo Nicolas Rakotopare Preliminary Draft Design considerations for post natural disaster (fire) on-ground assessment of status of species, ecological communities, habitats and threats Dr Darren Southwell, The University of Melbourne April 2020 Preliminary Draft – Design considerations for post natural disaster (fire) on-ground assessment of status of species, ecological communities, habitats and threats Darren Southwell, University of Melbourne Purpose: This initial version is intended to provide guidance for the delivery of projects funded by the Wildlife and Habitat Recovery Program that include assessments, however its value is likely to extend to other stakeholders undertaking on-ground assessments. The document is a preliminary draft. It will be updated with more specific guidelines for rapid reconnaissance surveys after further consultation with species experts. Consideration will be given to guidance for plants following release of the list of priority plants requiring intervention following the bushfires. This next, more mature, iteration of the document will be available to guide project delivery. 1 Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Aim of document .................................................................................................................................... 3 Step 1: Identify target species that may occur in fire affected region ................................................... 4 Step 2: Determine the optimal timing of surveys ................................................................................... 5 Step 3: Determine the optimal location of surveys ................................................................................ 5 Step 4: Establishing a reconnaissance site .............................................................................................. 6 Step 5: Measuring fire severity ............................................................................................................... 6 Step 6: Measuring habitat condition ...................................................................................................... 7 Step 7: Conducting surveys for priority species or communities ........................................................... 7 Selecting the entity to be measured ................................................................................................... 7 Select preferred sampling method for target species ........................................................................ 8 Threatened ecological communities ................................................................................................. 13 Select preferred sampling method for vertebrate predator threats ................................................ 13 Step 8: Decide on minimum survey effort ............................................................................................ 14 Step 9: Ensure appropriate personnel and ethics approval ................................................................. 15 Step 10: Data recording and management ........................................................................................... 15 Published detectability studies for priority species .............................................................................. 16 Birds .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Mammals .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Fish .................................................................................................................................................... 52 Frogs .................................................................................................................................................. 69 Invertebrates ..................................................................................................................................... 86 Reptiles ............................................................................................................................................. 91 Spiny crayfish .................................................................................................................................. 114 References .......................................................................................................................................... 115 2 Executive summary The purpose of this document is to highlight design considerations for conducting post-fire reconnaissance surveys to assess fire severity, habitat condition and threats, as well as the status of priority threatened species and ecological communities listed by the Federal Government as most vulnerable to the 2019-20 wildfires. It reviews the published literature on the preferred sampling method(s), minimum survey effort and the optimal timing of surveys to detect priority species and faunal threats with a high degree of confidence. Careful consideration of these factors in the design of post-fire reconnaissance surveys will maximise the chance of understanding the impact of the fires while providing the necessary information to prioritise management. This initial version of the document is intended to provide funding applicants to the Wildlife and Habitat Bushfire Recovery Program with guidance in the development of their project applications; however, its value is likely to extend to other stakeholders undertaking on- ground assessments. It is a preliminary draft and will be updated with more specific guidelines after consultation with species experts. Consideration will be given to guidance for plants following release of the list of priority plants requiring intervention following the bushfires. This next, more mature, iteration of the document will be available to guide project delivery. Background The 2019-20 wildfires in southern Australia have had an unprecedented impact on native species and ecological communities. Monitoring is crucial for quantifying the impact of such catastrophic events, for prescribing management interventions, and for measuring the recovery of populations over space and time (Possingham et al. 2012). However, designing large-scale, multi-species monitoring programs is complex: decisions must be made about where to monitor, what to record, the type(s) of sampling methods, the duration of monitoring, the arrangement of monitoring sites, and the frequency and intensity of sampling (Southwell et al. 2019). These decisions are further complicated by limited budget, logistical and time constraints, and the fact that monitoring is already underway for many species and environments across a range of jurisdictions. On 11th February 2020, the Australian Government released a list of threatened faunal species considered most vulnerable to the 2019-20 wildfires (Legge et al. 2020). The species were selected by the Wildlife and Threatened Species Bushfire Recovery Expert Panel based on their degree of range overlap with the fires and an assessment of their ecological traits such as dispersal ability. The initial assessment provided a provisional list of 113 species which included 20 reptile species, 17 frog species, 13 bird species, 19 mammal species, 5 invertebrates, 22 crayfish and 17 fish. On 24th March, a further 8 species were added to this list and two species were removed, increasing the number of priority faunal species to 119. A list of Threatened Ecological Communities with more than 10% of their range burnt has also been released, while assessments of vascular plants and invertebrates are in progress. Aim of document The aim of this document is to highlight preliminary design considerations for how, where and when to survey for the priority threatened species and ecological communities, as well as how to assess fire severity, habitat condition and faunal threats. While long-term 3 monitoring should aim to track the recovery of fire affected species and communities over time, the focus here is how to conduct rapid reconnaissance surveys to better understand the immediate impact of the fires on the distribution and status of listed species and communities. Post-fire reconnaissance surveys are already being conducted by other land management organisations for some of the listed priority species. The goal of this project is to provide guidance from a national perspective on how and where to survey while complementing these important survey efforts already underway. This will identify regions/species currently under-represented in post-fire assessments and promote a unified approach to on-ground surveys. Reconnaissance surveys should consider where to survey, the choice of sampling method(s), and the minimum survey effort required to have a high chance at detecting target species. This document describes 10 key steps required for effective surveys, with preliminary guidance on: • preferred sampling method(s); • minimum survey effort required to ensure species can be declared absent with a high degree of confidence; • how to assess fire severity, habitat condition and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LEP 2010 LZN Template
    WILD CATTLE CREEK E1E1E1 DORRIGO RU2RU2 GLENREAGH MULDIVA RU2RU2 OLD BILLINGS RD RAILWAY NATURE COAST TYRINGHAM RESERVE RD RD Bellingen Local E1EE1E11 BORRA CREEK DORRIGO NATIONAL PARK CORAMBA RD E3EE3E33 SLINGSBYS Environmental Plan LITTLE MURRAY RIVER RU2RRU2U2 RD LITTLE PLAIN CREEK BORRA CREEK TYRINGHAM COFFSCOFFS HARBOURHARBOUR 2010 RD CITYCCITYITY COUNCILCOUNCIL BREAKWELLS WILD CATTLE CREEK RD RU2RRU2U2 CORAMBA RD RU2RU2 NEAVES NEAVES RD RD SLINGSBYS RD Land Zoning Map LITTLE MURRAY RIVER OLD COAST RD E3EE3E33 RU2RRU2U2 Sheet LZN_004 E3EE3E33 DEER VALE RD OLD CORAMBA TYRINGHAM RD NTH RD ROCKY CREEK RU1RU1 BARTLETTS RD ReferRefer toto mapmap LZN_004ALZN_004A Zone RU1RRU1U1 BIELSDOWN RIVER E1EE1E11 DEER VALE RD B1 Neighbourhood Centre RU1RU1 DORRIGO NATIONAL PARK B2 Local Centre JOHNSENS WATERFALL WAY OLD CORAMBA WATERFALL WAY RD STH EE3E3E33 E1 National Parks and Nature Reserves E3E3E3 BENNETTS RD E2 Environmental Conservation WATERFALL WAY SHEPHERDS RD RU1RRU1U1 E3 Environmental Management DOME RD EVERINGHAMS ROCKY CREEK RD BIELSDOWN RIVER DORRIGO NATIONAL PARK E4 Environmental Living E3EE3E33 SP1SP1SP1 E3E3E3 SHEPHERDS RD WHISKY CEMETERYCCEMETERYEMETERY DOME RD IN1 General Industrial CREEK RD RU1RRU1U1 RU1RRU1U1 WOODLANDS RD WATERFALL R1 General Residential WAY RU1RRU1U1 PROMISED RU1RU1 E3E3E3 LAND RD WATERFALL WAY R5 Large Lot Residential WHISKY CREEK E1EE1E11 RU1RU1 DORRIGO NATIONAL PARK E1E1E1 E1EE1E11 RE1 Public Recreation BIELSDOWN RIVER E3EE3E33 ROCKY CREEK RD RE2 Private Recreation WHISKY CREEK RD RU1RRU1U1 RU2RU2 E3E3E3
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Impact Assessment for Priority Frogs: Northern Philoria
    Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria Geoffrey Heard, Liam Bolitho, David Newell, Harry Hines, Hunter McCall, Jill Smith and Ben Scheele July 2021 Cite this publication as: Heard, G., Bolitho, L., Newell, D., Hines, H., McCall, H., Smith, J., and Scheele, B., 2021. Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria. NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub Project 8.1.3 report, Brisbane. Main cover image: Philoria habitat. Image: Liam Bolitho. Insert images (from top to bottom): Philoria kundagungan. Image: Harry Hines; Philoria richmondensis. Image: David Newell; Philoria loveridgei. Image: Harry Hines. 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Study species .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bellinger and Kalang River Estuaries Erosion Study
    Bellinger and Kalang River Estuaries Erosion Study Damon Telfer GECO Environmental Tim Cohen IRM Consultants February 2010 Report prep ared for BELLINGEN SHIRE COUNCIL DISCLAIMER Whilst every care has been taken in compiling this erosion study and report, no assurances are given that it is free from error or omission. The authors make no expressed or implied warranty of the accuracy or fitness of the recommendations in the report and disclaim all liability for the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance upon these recommendations. The use of this report is at the user’s risk and discretion. The authors will not be liable for any loss, damage, costs or injury including consequential, incidental, or financial loss arising out of the use of this report. This report was produced with financial assistance from the NSW Government through the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water. This document does not necessarily represent the opinions of the NSW Government or the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water. Damon Telfer GECO Environmental 5 Arcadia Lane, GRASSY HEAD NSW 2441 Email: [email protected] © Damon Telfer, February 2010. This document is copyright and cannot be reproduced in part or whole without the express permission of the author. A permanent, irrevocable royalty-free, non-exclusive license to make these reports, documents and any other materials publicly available and to otherwise communicate, reproduce, adapt and publicise them on a non- profit basis is granted by the authors to Bellingen Shire Council and the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for The
    Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (Myuchelys georgesi) December, 2016 1 Workshop participants. Back row (l to r): Ricky Spencer, Bruce Chessman, Kristen Petrov, Caroline Lees, Gerald Kuchling, Jane Hall, Gerry McGilvray, Shane Ruming, Karrie Rose, Larry Vogelnest, Arthur Georges; Front row (l to r) Michael McFadden, Adam Skidmore, Sam Gilchrist, Bruno Ferronato, Richard Jakob-Hoff © Copyright 2017 CBSG IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Jakob-Hoff, R. Lees C. M., McGilvray G, Ruming S, Chessman B, Gilchrist S, Rose K, Spencer R, Hall J (Eds) (2017). Status Review, Disease Risk Analysis and Conservation Action Plan for the Bellinger River Snapping Turtle. IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Cover photo: Juvenile Bellinger River Snapping Turtle © 2016 Brett Vercoe This report can be downloaded from the CBSG website: www.cbsg.org. 2 Executive Summary The Bellinger River Snapping Turtle (BRST) (Myuchelys georgesi) is a freshwater turtle endemic to a 60 km stretch of the Bellinger River, and possibly a portion of the nearby Kalang River in coastal north eastern New South Wales (NSW).
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Police Gazette 1878
    This sampler file contains various sample pages from the product. Sample pages will often include: the title page, an index, and other pages of interest. This sample is fully searchable (read Search Tips) but is not FASTFIND enabled. To view more samplers click here www.gould.com.au www.archivecdbooks.com.au · The widest range of Australian, English, · Over 1600 rare Australian and New Zealand Irish, Scottish and European resources books on fully searchable CD-ROM · 11000 products to help with your research · Over 3000 worldwide · A complete range of Genealogy software · Including: Government and Police 5000 data CDs from numerous countries gazettes, Electoral Rolls, Post Office and Specialist Directories, War records, Regional Subscribe to our weekly email newsletter histories etc. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER AND FACEBOOK www.unlockthepast.com.au · Promoting History, Genealogy and Heritage in Australia and New Zealand · A major events resource · regional and major roadshows, seminars, conferences, expos · A major go-to site for resources www.familyphotobook.com.au · free information and content, www.worldvitalrecords.com.au newsletters and blogs, speaker · Free software download to create biographies, topic details · 50 million Australasian records professional looking personal photo books, · Includes a team of expert speakers, writers, · 1 billion records world wide calendars and more organisations and commercial partners · low subscriptions · FREE content daily and some permanently This sampler file includes the title page and various sample pages from this volume. This file is fully searchable (read search tips page) but is not FASTFIND enabled New South Wales Police Gazette 1878 Ref. AU2103-1878 ISBN: 978 1 921416 10 1 This book was kindly loaned to Archive CD Books Australia by New South Wales Justice and Police Museum http://www.hht.net.au/museums/jp/justice_and_police_museum Navigating this CD To view the contents of this CD use the bookmarks and Adobe Reader’s forward and back buttons to browse through the pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Estuarine Acidification on Survival and Growth of the Sydney Rock Oyster Saccostrea Glomerata
    EFFECTS OF ESTUARINE ACIDIFICATION ON SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF THE SYDNEY ROCK OYSTER SACCOSTREA GLOMERATA Michael Colin Dove Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The University of New South Wales Geography Program Faculty of the Built Environment The University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, 2052 April 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Jes Sammut for his ideas, guidance and encouragement throughout my candidature. I am indebted to Jes for his help with all stages of this thesis, for providing me with opportunities to present this research at conferences and for his friendship. I thank Dr Richard Callinan for his assistance with the histopathology and reviewing chapters of this thesis. I am also very grateful to Laurie Lardner and Ian and Rose Crisp for their invaluable advice, generosity and particular interest in this work. Hastings and Manning River oyster growers were supportive of this research. In particular, I would like to acknowledge the following oyster growers: Laurie and Fay Lardner; Ian and Rose Crisp; Robert Herbert; Nathan Herbert; Stuart Bale; Gary Ruprecht; Peter Clift; Mark Bulley; Chris Bulley; Bruce Fairhall; Neil Ellis; and, Paul Wilson. I am very grateful to Holiday Coast Oysters and Manning River Rock Oysters for providing: the Sydney rock oysters for field and laboratory experiments; storage facilities; equipment; materials; fuel; and, access to resources without reservation. Bruce Fairhall, Paul Wilson, Mark Bulley, Laurie Lardner and Robert Herbert also supplied Sydney rock oysters for this work. I would also like to thank the researchers who gave helpful advice during this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for NSW Mid-North Coast Regional Boating Plan
    Transport for NSW Regional Boating Plan Mid-North Coast Region February 2015 Transport for NSW 18 Lee Street Chippendale NSW 2008 Postal address: PO Box K659 Haymarket NSW 1240 Internet: www.transport.nsw.gov.au Email: [email protected] ISBN Register: 978 -1 -922030 -68 -9 © COPYRIGHT STATE OF NSW THROUGH THESECRETARY OF TRANSPORT FOR NSW 2014 Extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided the source is fully acknowledged. Report for Transport for NSW - Regional Boating Plan| i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Physical character of the waterways .............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Bellinger and Nambucca catchments and Coffs Harbour area ........................................... 7 2.3 Macleay catchment .............................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Hastings catchment ............................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Lord Howe Island ............................................................................................................... 11 2.6 Inland waterways ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
    Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Watching
    ADVENTURE EXPERIENCES Parts of New England High Country belong to the East Kunderang Homestead offers World Heritage Gondwana Rainforests of Australia beautifully restored heritage accommodation for up to 14 people BOULDERING on unique rock formations; New England granite experience a multi-day bushwalking adventure with lots of crimps, flakes and through world-heritage national parks friction. Stonehenge Recreation Park near Glen Innes has over seventy routes. Gara The park’s rock formations are particularly Gorge near Armidale and Bald Rock near photogenic in late-afternoon light or mist. Tenterfield are other classic bouldering Hundreds of kilometres of waterways and rockclimbing destinations. NEW ENGLAND HIGH COUNTRY BOASTS rage and meander through the Oxley Wild Rivers National Park, where huge tracts AN EXTENSIVE GORGE WILDERNESS WITH OVER 500 of magnificent wilderness are also World KILOMETRES OF WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS. DISCOVER Heritage listed. This is where camping, trout MOUNTAIN BIKING is massive in fishing, kayaking, swimming, canyoning and East Kunderang Homestead New England High Country. Local A UNIQUE NATURAL PLAYGROUND WITH MAGNIFICENT abseiling are major attractions. clubs have made over 40km of WATERFALLS, RAINFORESTS AND EXOTIC FLORA AND FAUNA. tracks that present some spectacular and purpose-built tracks around Guyra and The 7km walk from Budds Mare to Riverside varied wilderness walking opportunities. An Armidale. At Washpool and Gibraltar you descends 700m to the Apsley River with great easy amble along the beautiful Coombadhja GREEN GULLY TRACK NEW ENGLAND can ride a 50km loop through World bass fishing, swimming holes, camping and WILDERNESS TRAIL Imagine a place where the geology and biodiversity is Creek takes you through rainforest and dry Experience fern-lined gullies, high Heritage National Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Need for New Reserves
    Koala Strategy Submissions, PO Box A290, Sydney South NSW 1232, [email protected] CC. [email protected] 2nd March 2017. NPA SUBMISSION: WHOLE OF GOVERNMENT KOALA STRATEGY; SAVING OUR SPECIES DRAFT STRATEGY AND REVIEW OF STATE ENVIRONMENT PLANNING POLICY 44—KOALA HABITAT PROTECTION Introduction The National Parks Association of NSW (NPA), established in 1957, is a community-based organisation with over 20,000 supporters from rural, remote and urban areas across the state. NPA promotes nature conservation and evidence- based natural resource management. We have a particular interest in the protection of the State’s biodiversity and supporting ecological processes, both within and outside of the formal conservation reserve system. NPA has a long history of engagement with both government and non-government organisations on issues of park management. NPA appreciates the opportunity to comment on the whole of government koala strategy (the strategy), the Saving Our Species iconic koala project (the SOS project) and the Explanation of intended effect: State Environment and Planning Policy 44 (Koala Habitat Protection) (SEPP 44). Please note, NPA made a submission on SEPP 44 in late 2016 prior to the deadline being extended which we have reattached at the end of this document (Appendix 1). NPA was also consulted on the SOS programme in August 2016, which we greatly appreciated. We provided OEH with feedback on the programme at that time, which also contained an exploration of issues facing koalas, which we have reattached in Appendix 2. NPA has had significant input to the development of the Stand Up For Nature (SUFN) submission to this consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation by Introduced Cats Felis Catus on Australian Frogs: Compilation of Species Records and Estimation of Numbers Killed
    Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed J. C. Z. WoinarskiA,M, S. M. LeggeB,C, L. A. WoolleyA,L, R. PalmerD, C. R. DickmanE, J. AugusteynF, T. S. DohertyG, G. EdwardsH, H. GeyleA, H. McGregorI, J. RileyJ, J. TurpinK and B. P. MurphyA ANESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. BNESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of the Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. DWestern Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. ENESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, Qld 4701, Australia. GCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia. HNorthern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. INESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. JSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. KDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. LPresent address: WWF-Australia, 3 Broome Lotteries House, Cable Beach Road, Broome, WA 6276, Australia. MCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Data sources used in compilation of cat predation on frogs.
    [Show full text]