Wildlife and Conservation Bushfire Recovery Immediate Response January 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Post-Fire Impact Assessment for Priority Frogs: Northern Philoria
Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria Geoffrey Heard, Liam Bolitho, David Newell, Harry Hines, Hunter McCall, Jill Smith and Ben Scheele July 2021 Cite this publication as: Heard, G., Bolitho, L., Newell, D., Hines, H., McCall, H., Smith, J., and Scheele, B., 2021. Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria. NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub Project 8.1.3 report, Brisbane. Main cover image: Philoria habitat. Image: Liam Bolitho. Insert images (from top to bottom): Philoria kundagungan. Image: Harry Hines; Philoria richmondensis. Image: David Newell; Philoria loveridgei. Image: Harry Hines. 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Study species ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond. -
Predation by Introduced Cats Felis Catus on Australian Frogs: Compilation of Species Records and Estimation of Numbers Killed
Predation by introduced cats Felis catus on Australian frogs: compilation of species records and estimation of numbers killed J. C. Z. WoinarskiA,M, S. M. LeggeB,C, L. A. WoolleyA,L, R. PalmerD, C. R. DickmanE, J. AugusteynF, T. S. DohertyG, G. EdwardsH, H. GeyleA, H. McGregorI, J. RileyJ, J. TurpinK and B. P. MurphyA ANESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. BNESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia. CFenner School of the Environment and Society, Linnaeus Way, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2602, Australia. DWestern Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Bentley, WA 6983, Australia. ENESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, Desert Ecology Research Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. FQueensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Red Hill, Qld 4701, Australia. GCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood campus), Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3216, Australia. HNorthern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, PO Box 1120, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia. INESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub, School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. JSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom. KDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia. LPresent address: WWF-Australia, 3 Broome Lotteries House, Cable Beach Road, Broome, WA 6276, Australia. MCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. Data sources used in compilation of cat predation on frogs. -
ARAZPA YOTF Infopack.Pdf
ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Information pack ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Printing: The ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign pack was generously supported by Madman Printing Phone: +61 3 9244 0100 Email: [email protected] Front cover design: Patrick Crawley, www.creepycrawleycartoons.com Mobile: 0401 316 827 Email: [email protected] Front cover photo: Pseudophryne pengilleyi, Northern Corroboree Frog. Photo courtesy of Lydia Fucsko. Printed on 100% recycled stock 2 ARAZPA 2008 Year of the Frog Campaign Contents Foreword.........................................................................................................................................5 Foreword part II ………………………………………………………………………………………… ...6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................9 Section 1: Why A Campaign?....................................................................................................11 The Connection Between Man and Nature........................................................................11 Man’s Effect on Nature ......................................................................................................11 Frogs Matter ......................................................................................................................11 The Problem ......................................................................................................................12 The Reason -
Field Survey Methods for Fauna. Amphibians
Threatened species survey and assessment guidelines: field survey methods for fauna Amphibians Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (information & publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Web: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2009/213 ISBN 978 1 74232 191 2 April 2009 Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................1 2. Nocturnal searches...................................................................................................3 3. Call surveys, including call playback .........................................................................4 4. Tadpole surveys ........................................................................................................6 5. Other survey methods ...............................................................................................8 6. Information to be included in the final report .............................................................9 7. Survey effort ...........................................................................................................10 8. Recommended survey effort and method for each species ....................................11 9. References and further reading...............................................................................31 1. Introduction All investigators conducting -
Preliminary Draft Design Considerations for Post Natural Disaster (Fire) On-Ground Assessment of Status of Species, Ecological Communities, Habitats and Threats
Kangaroo Island glossy black-cockatoo at a breeding site that escaped the Jan 2020 fires. Photo Nicolas Rakotopare Preliminary Draft Design considerations for post natural disaster (fire) on-ground assessment of status of species, ecological communities, habitats and threats Dr Darren Southwell, The University of Melbourne April 2020 Preliminary Draft – Design considerations for post natural disaster (fire) on-ground assessment of status of species, ecological communities, habitats and threats Darren Southwell, University of Melbourne Purpose: This initial version is intended to provide guidance for the delivery of projects funded by the Wildlife and Habitat Recovery Program that include assessments, however its value is likely to extend to other stakeholders undertaking on-ground assessments. The document is a preliminary draft. It will be updated with more specific guidelines for rapid reconnaissance surveys after further consultation with species experts. Consideration will be given to guidance for plants following release of the list of priority plants requiring intervention following the bushfires. This next, more mature, iteration of the document will be available to guide project delivery. 1 Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Aim of document ................................................................................................................................... -
Amphibian Community Response to Flow and Rainfall on a Dryland Floodplain Wetland
Linking frogs with flow: Amphibian community response to flow and rainfall on a dryland floodplain wetland Joanne Ocock A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Australian Wetlands, Rivers and Landscapes Centre School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales, Australia September 2013 …But he’d be sitting by the campfire, trying out a simple conversation, and suddenly people would get upset over nothing at all and drive him off. You didn’t expect people to get nasty just because you’d said something like, ‘My word, when did it last rain here?’ did you? “The Last Continent” by Terry Pratchett i Abstract Floods structure the biota of floodplain wetlands, driving spatial and temporal patterns of vegetation, invertebrates, and waterbirds. Flood pulses trigger ‘booms’ in productivity and biodiversity as aquatic biota respond to abundant freshwater habitat and resources. Water extraction and river regulation have decreased the magnitude, duration and frequency of floods, and reduced floodplain extent. To address this problem, environmental water management aims to restore wetland functioning by mimicking the natural flow regime but this requires knowledge of broad ecological responses and associations to flows. Despite amphibians forming a significant component of wetland foodwebs, their response to river flows is poorly known. My work focused on understanding this response in the Macquarie Marshes, a dryland floodplain wetland in Australia. The Macquarie Marshes are a wetland of international significance, severely affected by river regulation. They currently benefit from significant public environmental water investment initiatives. In this thesis I aimed to: (1) investigate variations in relationships between flooding and responses of amphibian species, and quantify the contribution amphibians make to the flood-pulse derived resource ‘boom’; and (2) assess the threat river regulation poses compared to other known amphibian threats across Australia. -
Post-Fire Impact Assessment for Priority Frogs: Northern Philoria
Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria Geoffrey Heard, Liam Bolitho, David Newell, Harry Hines, Hunter McCall, Jill Smith and Ben Scheele July 2021 Cite this publication as: Heard, G., Bolitho, L., Newell, D., Hines, H., McCall, H., Smith, J., and Scheele, B., 2021. Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria. NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub Project 8.1.3 report, Brisbane. Main cover image: Philoria habitat. Image: Liam Bolitho. Insert images (from top to bottom): Philoria kundagungan. Image: Harry Hines; Philoria richmondensis. Image: David Newell; Philoria loveridgei. Image: Harry Hines. 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Study species ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
Forest Land Flora Reserve Working Plan
Forest Land Flora Reserve SITE SPECIFIC WORKING PLAN FCNSW Compartments: 199, 200, 211, 228, 337, 338, 342 and 343 Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. NPWS MANAGEMENT 4 3. DETAILS OF THE RESERVE 5 3.1 Location 5 3.2 Key Attributes of the Reserve 5 3.3 General Description 5 3.4 History 10 3.5 Current Usage 14 4. DETAILS OF MANAGEMENT 14 4.1 Objectives of Management 14 4.2 Management Strategies (Policies) 15 4.3 Activity Permissions 16 Activities permitted without approval or conditions 16 Activities permitted with conditions 16 Activities not permitted 16 4.4 Observation, reporting and review 17 REFERENCES 18 APPENDIX 1 – GENERAL WORKING PLAN 19 APPENDIX 2 – ADAPTABLE WORKS PROGRAM 31 APPENDIX 3 – THREATENED NATIVE PLANTS 33 APPENDIX 4 – THREATENED NATIVE ANIMALS 34 Front cover: Forest Land Flora Reserve. Photo credit: M Lieberman, OEH Forest Land Flora Reserve Working Plan Version No.: 1 Page 2 of 34 Document ID (Visual Vault): XX XXX Issue date: October 2018 Review date: October 2023 WARNING: a printed copy of this document may be uncontrolled. Please verify this is the latest version prior to use. Figure 1 Location map Forest Land Flora Reserve Working Plan Version No.: 1 Page 3 of 34 Document ID (Visual Vault): XX XXX Issue date: October 2018 Review date: October 2023 WARNING: a printed copy of this document may be uncontrolled. Please verify this is the latest version prior to use. 1. Introduction In 2018 the NSW Government dedicated a series of public lands as national park, state conservation area and flora reserve in northern NSW. -
Northern Rivers Regional Biodiversity Management Plan
Foreword The Northern Rivers Regional Biodiversity Management Plan (the Plan) constitutes the national regional recovery plan under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 for threatened species and ecological communities principally distributed in the Northern Rivers Region of NSW. The Plan is part of an Australian Government-funded pilot to trial the integration of regional recovery and threat abatement planning. It provides a regional approach to the delivery of recovery actions necessary to ensure the long-term viability of threatened species and ecological communities in the Region. The Northern Rivers Region is an area relatively rich in biodiversity data. This has allowed for innovative and sophisticated analysis techniques to be used in this Plan for biodiversity assessment and identification of priority areas for conservation works. These outputs will help guide investment by the Australian Government, New South Wales Government and local authorities in the Region. Collaboration and partnerships will be essential for the implementation of the Plan. The Plan considers all threats affecting biodiversity in the Region, including those associated with the potential impacts of climate change. The Plan also incorporates Indigenous cultural values and considerations into biodiversity management in the Region. It is in this context that the Plan, in association with the approved Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan (DECCW 2010), sets out an overall strategy for the conservation and restoration -
Threatened Species Climate Change Vulnerability
The vulnerability of threatened species and ecological communities to climate change in NSW Final report on the vulnerability of threatened species and ecological communities to climate change in NSW March 2016 Michelle R. Leishman, Claire A. Laws, Linda Beaumont and Nola M. Hancock Report prepared for the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage Project funded by the NSW Adaptation Research Hub – Biodiversity Node ISBN 978-0-9925006-2-7 Table of Contents Acknowledgements List of Tables List of Figures Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………...1 Section 1 1.1 Status of threatened species and ecological communities in NSW……………………………...4 1.1.1 Species and ecological communities listed as threatened under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 …………………………………………………………………………………………….4 1.1.2 Review of NSW Scientific Committee Final Determinations ………………………………………...4 1.2 Vulnerability of threatened species and communities to climate change …………………….8 1.2.1 How many threatened species and ecological communities have climate change identified as a threat in their Final Determination? ………………………………………………………………8 1.2.2 Which types of species and ecological communities have climate change identified as a threat in their Final Determination? …………………………………………………………………………………..20 1.2.3 What types of climate change threats are identified in Final Determinations and how are these distributed across the different types of species and ecological communities? …..21 Section 2 2.1 Assessment of Conservation Projects for site-managed species …………………………….….24 -
Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 No 101
Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 No 101 Status information Currency of version Current version for 5 August 2016 to date (generated 11 August 2016 at 16:14). Legislation on the NSW legislation website is usually updated within 3 working days. Provisions in force All the provisions displayed in this version of the legislation have commenced. For commencement and other details see the Historical notes. Does not include amendments by: Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Act 2008 No 36 (amended by Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No 2) 2014 No 88) (not commenced) This version of the legislation is compiled and maintained in a database of legislation by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website. New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 No 101 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 4A Biodiversity values—meaning 5 5 Notes in text 5 5A Relationship between this Act and Part 7A of the Fisheries Management Act 1994 5 Part 2 Listing of threatened species, populations and ecological communities and key threatening processes Division 1 Lists of threatened species, populations and ecological communities and key threatening processes 6 Lists of endangered and critically endangered species, populations and ecological communities 7 7 Schedule 2 list of vulnerable species and ecological communities 8 8 Schedule 3 list of key threatening processes 8 9 Listing of nationally threatened species and ecological communities