DOCSLIB.ORG

The Police Experience of the Popular Front

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Police Experience of the Popular Front 8 Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 From Hope to Disappointment: The Police Experience of the Popular Front In Marseille, the general election campaign of 1936 got off to a violent start. On 16 April, an off-duty Gardien de la Paix, Charles Antoine Castola, was beaten and then mortally wounded by two bullets in the kidneys in the Boulevard Camille-Pelletan at the entrance to the Celona bar which served as campaign headquarters to the Socialist candidate, Pierre Ferri-Pisani. Castola was not an officer of whom the Police were particularly proud. Born in Ajaccio in 1901, he had entered the force in 1925 and after promising beginnings had fallen out of favour. Each summer he would apply for sick leave, seemingly in an attempt to prolong his holidays to his family’s village of Zevaco in Corsica. In 1932, he took over one hundred days off through illness and soon after returning to work the following year he contracted a hernia raising his truncheon to direct the traffic necessitating further convalescence. In his annual assessments he had passed from a young, energetic, intelligent officer uninterested in politics and with a bright future to a mediocre revolutionary who spent his time provoking col- leagues. Almost as soon as Castola died the campaign to claim him politically began. Ferri-Pisani, who accompanied the dying man to the Hôtel-Dieu, that vast creamy-orange hospital reconstructed in the 18th century, immediately had posters glued on the walls of the city claiming that Joseph (sic) Castola had been a good friend of his and accusing Simon Sabiani, to whom Ferri-Pisani had previously served as political lieutenant before Sabiani’s shift to the extreme-right, of having organised his assassination. Using the medium of their bi-weekly newspaper Marseille-Libre, the Sabianistes replied in turn, reminding their readers that Charles Castola had been a member of the ‘Comité Simon Sabiani’ (‘Friends of Simon Sabiani’) and had spent the after- noon before his death in their company in Sabiani’s headquarters, situated not twenty meters from Ferri-Pisani’s, and accusing the Socialists of having killed ‘one of theirs’. The campaign to claim Castola politically was symbolic of the importance the Police held in political debate in France at that moment.1 1 AD BDR, 4M 76, dossier Castola; AD BDR 4M 178, Commissariat Central, daily report of 16 to 17 April, 1936; Marseille Libre, 19 April 1936 & 23 April 1936; Marseille Soir, 17 April 1936; Petit Marseillais, 18 April 1936; Petit Provençal, 18 April 1936 & 21 April 1936; Loup Durand, Le Caïd, Paris, 1976, p 233; J.-B. Nicolai, Simon Sabiani, Paris, 1991, pp 198-199. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2014 | doi 10.1163/9789004265233_003 From Hope To Disappointment 9 Public order issues were at the very heart of the foundation of the Popular Front, a political alliance of Socialists, Radicals, Communists, trade unions and civil rights groups. The need for a defensive alliance of left-wing forces had become apparent in reaction to the bloody evening of 6 February 1934: one of those tumultuous riots with which Parisian history is littered. In the wake of the Stavisky and Raynaldi politico-financial scandals and the consequent sack- ing of Jean Chiappe, Prefect of Police known for his friendly relations with the leagues of the extreme-right, anti-Republican militants had taken to the streets to demonstrate their hostility to the parliamentary regime. By the light of burning buses and flames provoked by gas spurting out of broken street-lamps, Police and extreme-right militants fought a pitched battle using iron bars, clubs, sabres and handguns. As the number of casualties mounted, reaching a total of 17 dead and 2300 injured, the Police were outflanked. 3000 militants from the para-military league the Croix-de-Feu found just a feeble roadblock of 38 Police officers separating them from the parliament buildings. Historians are still debating why the Croix-de-Feu leader, de la Rocque, decided to send his troops towards the Esplanade des Invalides rather than to force this road- block but most agree that his grouping could easily have invaded the parlia- ment. Coming just a year after Hitler’s seizure of power, contemporaries viewed this riot as proof of a ‘fascist’ threat in France. From these events, the left drew the lesson that it needed to stop its sectarian in-fighting, recognise the extreme- right as its principal enemy and form an alliance to defend Republican institu- tions and public order.2 In the elections of 1936 even the Communists made public order one of their priorities. The headline of the Communist daily L’Humanité of 24 April read: ‘For public order, vote Communist’. The Radicals and the reformist wing of the Socialist party had always been profoundly legalist and so pleading for public order came much more naturally to them. The Socialist Léon Blum, who became prime minister after the Popular Front’s triumph in the general elec- tions of 26 April and 3 May 1936, stressed that failure to preserve public order would paralyse the government. The Interior Minister Roger Salengro, also a Socialist, announced that between anarchy and order he would always opt for the latter and promised that whatever the cost he would make order prevail. In Salengro’s conception order would be maintained primarily by assuring social harmony and by encouraging a partnership of employers and employees so that negotiation would replace conflict. Salengro was proud to be able to report 2 Chambre des députés, Rapport des événements du 6 février 1934, Paris, 1934; Philippe Bourdrel, La Cagoule, p 22; Jan Stevenson, The Cagoule Conspiracy, Dissertation for Bachelor’s degree (history), Yale University, 1972, pp 17-18..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism Erik Meddles Regis University
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Spring 2010 Partisan of Greatness: Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism Erik Meddles Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Meddles, Erik, "Partisan of Greatness: Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism" (2010). All Regis University Theses. 544. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/544 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University Regis College Honors Theses Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dutch Internationalist Communists and the Events in Spain (1936–7)
    chapter 9 The Dutch Internationalist Communists and the Events in Spain (1936–7) While the civil war in Spain did not cause a crisis in the gic, it nonetheless had a profound importance in the group’s history. It was the test-bed of the Dutch group’s revolutionary theory, confronted with a civil war which was to prepare the Second World-War, in the midst of revolutionary convulsions and an atmosphere of ‘anti-fascist’ popular fronts. Although often identified with anarchism, Dutch ‘councilism’ vigorously set itself apart from this current and denounced not its weaknesses, but its ‘passage into the camp of the bourgeoisie’. The gic defended a political analysis of the ‘Spanish revolution’ close to that of the Italian communist left. Finally, the events in Spain gave rise to the gic’s last attempt before 1939 to confront the revolutionary political milieu to the left of Trotskyism in Europe. This attempt was not without confusion, and even political ambiguity. Following the creation of the Republic, the internationalist Dutch commun- ists followed the evolution of the Spanish situation with great care. In 1931, the gic denounced not only the Republican bourgeoisie, which supported the Socialist Party of Largo Caballero, but also the anarchist movement. The cnt abandoned its old ‘principle’ of hostility to electoralism, and had its adherents vote en masse for Republican candidates. Far from seeing the cnt as a compon- ent of the workers’ movement, the gic insisted that anarcho-syndicalism had crossed the Rubicon with its ‘collaboration with bourgeois order’. The cnt had become ‘the ally of the bourgeoisie’.As an anarcho-syndicalist current, and thus a partisan of trade-unionism, the political action of the cnt could only lead to a strengthening of capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Popular Front in France
    THE NEW POPULAR FRONT IN FRANCE by George Ross The 1978 General Elections may well bring the French Left (and the Communist Party) to power in France. The Right Centre coalition which has ruled France for twenty years has repeatedly demonstrated its inability to deal with the present economic crisis-high inflation, unemployment, low growth-which it has played a major role in creating. As a result it has been rapidly losing support while simultaneously splitting into warring factions. The Union de la Gauche (Communists, Socialists and Left Radicals) has, meanwhile, become an electoral majority in the country (a fact demonstrated both in opinion polls and in the results of the March 1977 municipal elections). Its leaders, Fran~oisMitterrand and the PS (Parti Socialiste) and Georges Marchais of the PCF (Parti Communiste Francais) are now seen as genuine statesmen and as plausible Ministers of France, by a majority of Frenchmen. Its 'Common Programme for a Government of Left Union' is received as a credible platform for resolving the economic crisis and bringing needed change to French society. Rumour has it in Paris that high civil servants have already begun preparing for the arrival of new men in power. The stock exchange has begun to vibrate with fear-and with the beginnings of an investment strike against the Left (a strike which, because it has started so far in advance of the actual election date, has had the effect of undermining the existing regime even further). The Gaullist fraction of the ruling majority has already begun a barrage of anti-Left hysteria against the 'socialo- communist enemy' with its 'Marxist programme' to remove France from the 'camp of liberty'.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution
    Internationalist Group League for th,e Fourth International The Popular Front: Roadblock to Revolution Volunteers from the anarcho-syndicalist CNT and POUM militias head to the front against Franco's forces in Spanish Civil War, Barcelona, September 1936. The bourgeois Popular Front government defended capitalist property, dissolved workers' militias and blocked the road to revolution. Internationalist Group Class Readings May 2007 $2 ® <f$l~ 1162-M Introduction The question of the popular front is one of the defining issues in our epoch that sharply counterpose the revolution­ ary Marxism of Leon Trotsky to the opportunist maneuverings of the Stalinists and social democrats. Consequently, study of the popular front is indispensable for all those who seek to play a role in sweeping away capitalism - a system that has brought with it untold poverty, racial, ethnic, national and sexual oppression and endless war - and opening the road to a socialist future. "In sum, the People's Front is a bloc of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat," Trotsky wrote in December 1937 in re­ sponse to questions from the French magazine Marianne. Trotsky noted: "When two forces tend in opposite directions, the diagonal of the parallelogram approaches zero. This is exactly the graphic formula of a People's Front govern­ ment." As a bloc, a political coalition, the popular (or people's) front is not merely a matter of policy, but of organization. Opportunists regularly pursue class-collaborationist policies, tailing after one or another bourgeois or petty-bourgeois force. But it is in moments of crisis or acute struggle that they find it necessary to organizationally chain the working class and other oppressed groups to the class enemy (or a sector of it).
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Syndicalism: from Spain to South Africa to Global Labour Today
    Global Issues Reclaiming Syndicalism: From Spain to South Africa to global labour today Lucien van der Walt, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa Union politics remain central to the new century. It remains central because of the ongoing importance of unions as mass movements, internationally, and because unions, like other popular movements, are confronted with the very real challenge of articulating an alternative, transformative vision. There is much to be learned from the historic and current tradition of anarcho- and revolutionary syndicalism. This is a tradition with a surprisingly substantial and impressive history, including in the former colonial world; a tradition that envisages anti-bureaucratic and bottom-up trade unions as key means of educating and mobilising workers, and of championing the economic, social and political struggles of the broad working class, independent of parliamentary politics and party tutelage; and that aims, ultimately, at transforming society through union-led workplace occupations that will institute self-management and participatory economic planning, abolishing markets, hierarchies and states. This contribution seeks, firstly, to contribute to the recovery of the historical memory of the working class by drawing attention to its multiple traditions and rich history; secondly, to make a contribution to current debates on the struggles, direction and options for the working class movement (including unions) in a period of flux in which the fixed patterns of the last forty years are slowly melting away; thirdly, it argues that many current union approaches – among them, business unionism, social movement unionism, and political unionism – have substantial failings and limitations; and finally, it points to the need for labour studies and industrial sociology to pay greater attention to labour traditions besides business unionism, social movement unionism, and political unionism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Fronts and the Civil War in Spain Tim Rees
    10 The Popular Fronts and the Civil War in Spain tim rees Our desire is that all the organizations of the Popular Front be strengthened. Our desire is that all anti-fascist forces be consolidated, wherever they are to be found. Although I know that this can lead to criticism of our position, of our actions, never, never, can it be said that a single member, not a one, has been attracted to the party by the promise of advancement or the lure of personal 1 gain. These words were spoken as part of a rousing closing speech made by Jesús Hernández, a leading figure in the Spanish Communist Party (PCE), at a party plenum held in March 1937. At the time Spain was nine months into its brutal civil war which raged on until the final defeat of the republican side at the hands of General Franco’s Nationalists in April 1939.Theplenum was held partly to publicize the growing strength of the communist party but its central theme, echoed by all the speakers present, was to extol support for the Popular Front as an alliance of all the political parties and trade unions that supported the republic. In evoking the idea of the Popular Front, and the language of anti-fascism which accompanied it, the PCE was following policies common to the international communist movement. In the context of the war in Spain, Hernández hammered home the message that cooperation was the key to ultimate victory and that the PCE was providing a selfless example in working toward that common goal, all of which was reflected in the title of his speech: “Everything Within the Popular Front.” This plenum, and another held in November 1937, presented the PCE as not just at the heart of the conflict in Spain but as part of a worldwide struggle being led by the international communist movement against the threat of 1 Partido Comunista de España, Todo dentro del Frente Popular (Valencia: Ediciones del Partido Comunista de España, 1937).
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Front, Civil-Military Relations and the French Army’S Plan to Defeat a Second Paris Commune, 1934–1936
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 63-87 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Plan Z: The Popular Front, Civil-Military Relations and the French Army’s Plan to Defeat a Second Paris Commune, 1934–1936 Andrew Orr* Kansas State University [email protected] Abstract Following the formation of the Popular Front in 1934, French generals feared that the alliance, which included the French Communist Party (pcf), could foreshadow a com- ing revolt in Paris. Generals Maxime Weygand and Maurice Gamelin responded by preparing to implement Plan Z, a plan to defeat a Parisian revolt. Given politicians’ fear that many French officers were antirepublican, the French Army would have faced a major political crisis if Plan Z had leaked. Plan Z called for a multidivisional assault on Paris, which showed that the General Staff believed a large-scale revolution was possible. Understanding the development of Plan Z adds to scholars’ recognition of French officers’ long-term fear of communism and mistrust of civilians. It reveals that senior officers were more politicized and afraid of civilians than most scholars have realized and helps explain the military’s central role in betraying the Third Republic and creating the Vichy Regime in 1940. Keywords France – Civil-Military – Communism – Interwar – Popular Front – Vichy * Andrew Orr is Associate Professor of Military History and Security Studies at Kansas State University. He received his PhD in Modern European History from the University of Notre Dame in 2007. He is the author of Women and the French Army during the World Wars, 1914– 1940 (Indiana, 2017) and has published articles on military history and civil-military relations in the Journal of Military History, French Historical Studies, and French History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appeals of Communism in France 7
    CHAPTER TWO THE APPEALSOF COMMUNISMIN FRANCE As the importance of French communism to Moscow rests in part upon the widespread appeal of the PCF within France , it is important to understand that appeal . To do so we must return to the PCF 's origins . For if the Communist Party of France in 1966 seemed to have lost much in common with the party born in December 1920 at the Congress of Tours , it nevertheless retained the marks of its ancestry . In her extensive study , Les origin es du communisme franr ;ais (1914 - 1920 ); the historian Annie Kriegel , an old Communist militant notable for her " activity among the intellectuals ," has described in great detail the period between the Congress of Tours and the beginning of the First World War . She concluded that the adherence of the overwhelming majority of the Socialist Party to the Third International in 1920 can be explained only by the con - currence of certain specific circumstances in the French labor movement - that is, the Socialist defeat in the election of November 1919 , followed by the failure of the Syndicalist attempt at " total revolution " (the rail workers ' strike ), which was harshly suppressed in May 1920 . Seeing their hopes shattered , the French Socialists could not but " discover " bolshevism , which had just overcome civil war and foreign intervention in Russia . Adherence to the Third International , and thus the establishment of a link with the victorious Russian Revolution , made it possible to capture the dynamism and revolutionary energy of victorious bolshev - ism and inject it into French and European socialism , without absorbing everything which made bolshevism a specifically Russian product .2 In sum , for the French Socialists , adherence to the twenty -one conditions of the Communist International was to remain a formality .
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: the Extreme Right in the French Resistance: Members of the Cagoule and Corvignolles in the Second World War by Valerie Deacon Eric Martone
    International Social Science Review Volume 94 | Issue 1 Article 8 Book Review: The Extreme Right in the French Resistance: Members of the Cagoule and Corvignolles in the Second World War by Valerie Deacon Eric Martone Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr Part of the Anthropology Commons, Communication Commons, Economics Commons, Geography Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Martone, Eric () "Book Review: The Extreme Right in the French Resistance: Members of the Cagoule and Corvignolles in the Second World War by Valerie Deacon," International Social Science Review: Vol. 94 : Iss. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/issr/vol94/iss1/8 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Social Science Review by an authorized editor of Nighthawks Open Institutional Repository. Martone: Book Review: The Extreme Right in the French Resistance Deacon, Valerie. The Extreme Right in the French Resistance: Members of the Cagoule and Corvignolles in the Second World War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2016. x + 230 pages. Hardcover, $45.00. The French Third Republic, established following defeat in the Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871), launched an era of change for the French political right, which emerged as a loose collection of movements, individuals, and ideas (including protest, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-socialism/communism, anti-parliamentarianism, a stronger central government, and often anti-German sentiments). Several fascist or fascist-like organizations developed, and the rise of leagues, like the Ligue des Patriotes, became common.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Fascism and Democracy in the 1930S
    02_EHQ 32/1 articles 20/11/01 10:48 am Page 39 Tom Buchanan Anti-fascism and Democracy in the 1930s In November 1936 Konni Zilliacus wrote to John Strachey, a leading British left-wing intellectual and a prime mover in the recently founded Left Book Club, inviting him to ponder ‘the problem of class-war strategy and tactics in a democracy’. Zilliacus, a press officer with the League of Nations and subse- quently a Labour Party MP, was particularly worried about the failure of the Communist Party and the Comintern to offer a clear justification for their decision to support the Popular Front and collective security. ‘There is no doubt’, Zilliacus wrote, ‘that those who are on the side of unity are woefully short of a convincing come-back when the Right-Wing put up the story about Com- munist support of democracy etc. being merely tactical camou- flage.’1 Zilliacus’s comment raises very clearly the issue that lies at the heart of this article. For it is well known that the rise of fascism in the 1930s appeared to produce a striking affirmation of sup- port for democracy, most notably in the 1936 election victories of the Spanish and French Popular Fronts. Here, and elsewhere, anti-fascism was able to unite broad political coalitions rang- ing from liberals and conservatives to socialists, communists and anarchists. But were these coalitions united more by a fear of fascism than by a love of democracy — were they, in effect, marriages of convenience? Historians have long disagreed on this issue. Some have emphasized the prior loyalty of Communist supporters of the Popular Front to the Stalinist regime in the USSR, and have explained their new-found faith in democracy as, indeed, a mere ‘tactical camouflage’ (a view given retrospec- tive weight by the 1939 Nazi–Soviet Pact).
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Fascism in a Global Perspective
    ANTI-FASCISM IN A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Transnational Networks, Exile Communities, and Radical Internationalism Edited by Kasper Braskén, Nigel Copsey and David Featherstone First published 2021 ISBN: 978-1-138-35218-6 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-35219-3 (pbk) ISBN: 978-0-429-05835-6 (ebk) Chapter 10 ‘Aid the victims of German fascism!’: Transatlantic networks and the rise of anti-Nazism in the USA, 1933–1935 Kasper Braskén (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) This OA chapter is funded by the Academy of Finland (project number 309624) 10 ‘AID THE VICTIMS OF GERMAN FASCISM!’ Transatlantic networks and the rise of anti-Nazism in the USA, 1933–1935 Kasper Braskén Anti-fascism became one of the main causes of the American left-liberal milieu during the mid-1930s.1 However, when looking back at the early 1930s, it seems unclear as to how this general awareness initially came about, and what kind of transatlantic exchanges of information and experiences formed the basis of a rising anti-fascist consensus in the US. Research has tended to focus on the latter half of the 1930s, which is mainly concerned with the Communist International’s (Comintern) so-called popular front period. Major themes have included anti- fascist responses to the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935, the strongly felt soli- darity with the Spanish Republic during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939), or the slow turn from an ‘anti-interventionist’ to an ‘interventionist/internationalist’ position during the Second World War.2 The aim of this chapter is to investigate two communist-led, international organisations that enabled the creation of new transatlantic, anti-fascist solidarity networks only months after Hitler’s rise to power in January 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Document
    SCHOOL OF DIVINITY, HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY ACADEMIC SESSION 2018-2019 HI355N: CONFLICT AND ITS LEGACIES: FRANCE 1900 TO THE PRESENT 30 CREDITS: 11 WEEKS PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY: The full set of school regulations and procedures is contained in the Undergraduate Student Handbook which is available online at your MyAberdeen Organisation page. Students are expected to familiarise themselves not only with the contents of this leaflet but also with the contents of the Handbook. Therefore, ignorance of the contents of the Handbook will not excuse the breach of any School regulation or procedure. You must familiarise yourself with this important information at the earliest opportunity. COURSE CO-ORDINATOR Dr Elizabeth C. Macknight [email protected] Department of History, CA214 Office telephone: 01224 272297 Office hours: Thursday 10am-12pm or by appointment Discipline Administration Mrs Barbara McGillivray 50-52 College Bounds Room CB001 01224 272199 2019 [email protected] - 2018 | - Course Document 1 TIMETABLE For time and place of classes, please see MyAberdeen Students can also view their university timetable at http://www.abdn.ac.uk/infohub/study/timetables-550.php COURSE DESCRIPTION Experiences and memories of conflict have played an important role in shaping the development of France from 1900 to the present. This period of French history is marked by two world wars, Occupation and Liberation, colonial wars in Indochina and Algeria, the student revolt of May 1968, the strike wave of 1995, and the riots of November 2005. In this course we study the underlying causes and nature of the wars and civil unrest. We investigate links between conflict, cultural production, and social change; and we examine the legacies of conflict in debates about what it means to be ‘French’ and France’s relationships with other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]