Stiffness Variations on Railway Tracks Over Culvert Underpassings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stiffness Variations on Railway Tracks Over Culvert Underpassings Stiffness variations on railway tracks over culvert underpassings - A comparison between rigid concrete culverts with flexible steel-soil composite culverts By Dan Sergei Sukuvara Civil and Environmental Engineering Submission date: June 2019 Supervisor: Prof. Steinar Nordal Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Project title: Date: Stiffness variations on railway tracks over culvert underpassings 14.06.19 - A comparison between rigid concrete culverts with flexible steel- soil composite culverts Number of pages 86 Author: Dan Sergei Sukuvara Number of appendixes E-mail: [email protected] 3 Degree: Master of Science in Engineering (MSc) Study programme: Geotechnics and geohazards Professor in charge: Steinar Nordal External professional contacts/supervisors: Geir Svanø Employer: Bane NOR Abstract For many years have railway transition zones between embankment and bridge, both in Norway and internationally been described as a problem area where extra maintenance required. It is often thought that these problems relate to a combination of differential settlements and the sudden change in track stiffness, a deterioration loop which leads to an increase in track interaction forces and eventually creates differential settlements as a result. Comprehensive FEM with PLAXIS 2D was used in this thesis to model four railway transition zones in an attempt to quantify the stiffness variations seen over flexible and rigid culverts. The model involves train loads passing over a railway culvert where displacements are studied. From using the principles of plane-strain, it was possible to model the entire problem from skratch by building a culvert, backfilling, building a track and modelling moving train loads. The proce- dure purposed in this thesis was then used to study four specific scenarios of railway transition zones, but also for investigating the behaviour of these culverts. The results from these models suggests that the magnitude of the problem is insignificant as long as certain conditions are met. Data from the norwegian measuring car «ROGER 1000» has also been used for assessing six selected railway culverts were it was investigated if there was any correlation between the apparent stiffness variations at these sites and vertical track deviations measured by the veichle. For the six culvert cases, no clear trend in vertical track deviation over them was found when comparing to the adjecent free track. The general conclusion is that stiffness variations over these culverts are to small to create any obvious deterioration problem seen in vertical track geometry when comparing to a normal track. Keywords: 1. Railway transition zones and culverts 2. FEM using PLAXIS 2D 3. ROGER 1000 measurements 4. Stiffness variations and maintenance I Preferance This Master Thesis has been written as a mandatory closing part of the Master of Science programme, Geotechnics & Geohazards. The thesis make up for 30 out of total 120 credits in the programme. The work behind this thesis was carried out during the spring semester of 2019 at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim. The topic for the project was a continuation from the autumn's specialization project regarding railway transition zones in Norway, purposed by Geir Svanø and Juan Barrera from Bane NOR. Trondheim, 14.06.19 Dan Sergei Sukuvara II Acknowledgement During this project I’ve been consulting with several people, but my biggest thanks goes to my main supervisor Prof. Steinar Nordal and Dr. Albert Lau from the road and transport department. Their constant support during this project has been exceptional, Steinar for always making room for discussions and sharing his broad, yet outstanding knowledge. Albert for helping me whenever I was stuck on topics regarding railways. I would’ve never be able to keep such standard on so many broad topics without their constant support through the entire project. I also want to show my gratitude to Prof. Gustav Grimstad for interesting discussions and learning experiences regarding FEM in PLAXIS. His supervision was very helpful whenever I was stuck on parts with the model. A thanks goes to the seniors from Bane NOR, Geir Svanø and Alf-Helge Løhren for providing me with necressary information and sharing their experiences on topics related to railways. I also want to thank Trine-Lise Lorentsen for extracting and organizing ROGER 1000 data for me. Lastly, I want to thank Peder Hembre from ViaCon Norway and Jan Vaslestad from Statens Vegvesen for supporting me with litterature and discussions related to flexible steel-soil composite bridges. Peder provided me with alot of background information on several culverts used as a reference in this thesis, and Jan provided me with litterature and participated in several discussions where he shared his experiences. III Summary Railway transition zones, i.e the transition between embankment and bridge has over many years been reported as a problem area that requires additional maintenance. These problems are often thought to be related to differential settlements but also the sudden change in track stiffness, a deterioration loop which gradually worsens from train traffic as time passes by, which deteriorates the tracks geometry and causes higher rate of wear in all elements of this area. In this project the bridge transition problem was investigated and compared between rigid and flexible steel-soil composite culverts. In Norway, all new bridges expect for flexible ones are instrumented with transition slabs, a short concrete plate which extends out from the bridge a couple of meters into the fill. This is a fixed requirement independent of axle loads, bridge type or train speed. When comparing the transition slab to international solutions, questions arise from its relative short lenght compared 20-30 meter long transition zones seen at other high speed lines. In addition to this questionnaire comes the confusion from flexible steel-soil composite bridges which has no requirement set for the transition zones. From a comprehensive FEM with PLAXIS 2D was it possible model the entire problem in plane-strain from scratch in an attempt to quantify the problem over these culverts. The procedure involves building a culvert, constructing a railway track and modelling moving train loads which was used in the analysis of four specific cases created for this project. The general conclusion is that the irregularities seen at the track over these culverts from the model is relative small compared to a normal track. The pressumed correlation between stiffness variations and increased deterioration rate at transition zones was also investigated with ROGER 1000 data, a measuring car which rutinely registers vertical track deviations among other things for the entire railway network in Norway. In general, no trend were found for the six preselected culverts between the presumed stiffness variations over them and vertical track geometry deviations measured by ROGER 1000, when comparing them to the measurements at the adjecent free track. The conclusion from this project is that the stiffness variations seen at these kind of culverts are relative small as long as certain conditions are met, and there is no direct correlation between stiffness varations, differential settlements and increased deterioration in the transition zones of these culvert underpassings. IV Sammendrag Overgangen mellom bru og fylling («overgangssone») har over mange år blitt beskrevet som et problemområdet der det er et større behov for vedlikehold enn i et vanlig spor. Problemet er ofte tenkt å være relatert til differansesetninger men også stor variasjon i stivhet sett fra jernbanesporet, en ond sirkel som gradvis forværres av togtrafikk ettersom tiden går som vil forårsake geometriske avvik og økende slitasje på sporkomponentene i dette området. I dette prosjektet ble problemet med overgang bru-fylling undersøkt for stive og fleksible samvirke kulverter. I Norge stilles det et minimumskrav til at alle nye bruer med unntak for fleksible stålrør skal instrumenteres med over-gangsplate, en kort betongplate som strekker seg ut fra bruen et par meter inn mot fylling. Dette er et fastsatt krav uavhengig av aksellast, brutype eller toghastighet. Når overgangsplata sammenlignes med internasjonale løsninger stilles det spørsmål til dens relative korte lengde til sammenligning med 20-30 meter lange overgangssoner sett på andre høyhastighets- baner. I tillegg til dette spørsmålet skapes det desto større forvirring til at det ikke er stilt noen krav til overgangssonene for fleksible samvirkekonstruksjoner. Fra en omfattende FEM analyse med PLAXIS 2D var det mulig å modellere hele problemet overgangs- soner i plan-tøyning fra scratch i et forsøk om å tallfeste problemet. Prosedyren omhandler bygging av kulvert, bygging av jernbanespor og modellering av bevegelige toglaster. Denne metodikken ble benyttet for å analysere fire spesifikke scenarioer laget for dette prosjektet. Den generelle konklusjonen etter disse modellene er at de uregelmessighetene (forskjellene) i forskyvning sett på et jernbanespor som følge av disse stivhets-variasjonene er relativt små til sammenligning med et vanlig jernbanespor. Den ofte antatte korrelasjonen mellom stivhetsvariasjoner på et jernbanespor og økt nedbrytningsrate i overgangssonene ble også undersøkt med ROGER 1000 data, målevognen
Recommended publications
  • Report on Railway Accident with Freight Car Set That Rolled Uncontrolledly from Alnabru to Sydhavna on 24 March 2010
    Issued March 2011 REPORT JB 2011/03 REPORT ON RAILWAY ACCIDENT WITH FREIGHT CAR SET THAT ROLLED UNCONTROLLEDLY FROM ALNABRU TO SYDHAVNA ON 24 MARCH 2010 Accident Investigation Board Norway • P.O. Box 213, N-2001 Lillestrøm, Norway • Phone: + 47 63 89 63 00 • Fax: + 47 63 89 63 01 www.aibn.no • [email protected] This report has been translated into English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. As accurate as the translation might be, the original Norwegian text takes precedence as the report of reference. The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving railway safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger railway safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board’s task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for railway safety should be avoided. Photos: AIBN and Ruter As Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTIFICATION OF THE ACCIDENT ............................................................................................. 4 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INFORMATION ABOUT THE ACCIDENT ..................................................................... 6 1.1 Chain of events ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nasjona Signalplan 2020
    National Signalling Plan 2020 1 LIST OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL SIGNALLING PLAN ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1 GRAPHIC OVERVIEW – YEAR OF COMMISSIONING ........................................................................... 6 2.2 GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION IN MAP .............................................................................................. 6 3 DESCRIPTION PER LINE SECTION .............................................................................................. 8 4 DOCUMENT INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 9 4.1 TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 9 4.2 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 9 A significant proportion of the signalling systems on the Norwegian railway network are nearing the end of their life expectancy. This is an overall plan for the
    [Show full text]
  • Platform of Rail Infrastructure Managers in Europe
    P R I M E Platform of Rail Infrastructure Managers in Europe General Presentation November 2019 1 Main features . Acts as the European Network of Infrastructure Managers as established by the 4th Railway Package to: . develop Union rail infrastructure . support the timely and efficient implementation of the single European railway area . exchange best practices . monitor and benchmark performance and contribute to the market monitoring . tackle cross-border bottlenecks . discuss application of charging systems and the allocation of capacity on more than one network Added value . ‘Influencing’ function: industry able to affect draft legislation . ‘Early warning’ function: EC/ERA and industry - interaction and mutual understanding of respective ‘business’ . ‘Stress-test’ function: EC to test legislative proposals re their ‘implementability‘ . ‘Learning’ function: EC and IM to improve ‘Business’ function: Benchmarking of best practice to enhance IMs effectiveness and capabilities 2 The Evolution of PRIME – timeline Today September October March 2014 June 2016 The European Network of Rail IMs 2013 2013 First 8 IMs to EC proposes 26 participants, 40 members, 5 observers sign the 7 participants Declaration of 5 subgroups, 6 subgroups, Declaration of 2 subgroups: Intent to all IMs cooperation with 2 cooperation platforms Intent KPIs and benchmarking to set up PRIME regulators ad hoc working groups Implementing Acts ad hoc security group, PRIME PRIME PRIME 3 Members As of 20 December 2018: EU Industry Members Industry observers 20. Lietuvos geležinkeliai, LT European Commission 1. Adif, ES 1. CER (member) 2. Bane NOR, NO 21. LISEA, FR 2. EIM 3. Banedanmark, DK 22. MÁV Zrt , HU 3. RNE ERA (observer) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA PLANNER 2019 Irjinternational Railway Journal
    MEDIA PLANNER 2019 IRJInternational Railway Journal YOUR GLOBAL MEDIA PARTNER MEDIA PLANNER 2019 THE IRJ BRAND IRJ The global source of railway news THE IRJ BRAND Since its launch in 1960 as the world’s first truly global railway trade publication, International Railway Journal (IRJ) has set the bar for news coverage, analysis and in-depth reports on the latest technologies and trends to keep railway managers, engineers, and suppliers around the world up-to-date with developments in the global rail industry. HIGHLY RESPECTED EDITORIAL TEAM IRJ’s highly respected and knowledgeable team of journalists, regional editors and correspondents travel the world to produce in-depth and insightful reports on the latest railway and transit projects. IRJ sets a high standard for impartial reporting and bold design, while its easy-to-navigate website consistently carries a high-volume of quality news articles, making it a leading online news destination for the rail industry. EXTENSIVE GLOBAL REACH IRJ’s standing in the market is reflected in its extremely loyal readership and steadily-growing website traffic. According to our latest ABC audit1, 84% of IRJ’s total circulation of 10,324 railway professionals is requested compared with just 20.6%2 for our nearest competitors. IRJ’s growing global reach encompasses our monthly print magazine, interactive digital edition, news-leading website, daily and weekly newsletters, social media, webinars, and conferences. YOUR MEDIA PARTNER IRJ is one of the few constants in a rapidly-changing world, with new markets emerging, organisations restructuring, suppliers merging, and the continuous evolution of digital technologies. IRJ is your ideal partner to help your business grow and prosper.
    [Show full text]
  • General Technology Strategy
    General technology strategy 1 Contents Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Strategy process 5 The National Rail Administration business strategy 6 Requirements and performance targets 7 Technological trends and development features 9 Framework conditions for choosing technology 14 General technology strategy 20 Firm links with the National Rail Administration’s focus areas 22 Contact us 23 2 Foreword Anita Skauge Executive Director, Strategic Planning Jernbaneverket, the Norwegian National Rail Administration, is currently facing major technological challenges in conjunction with choosing the technical systems and facilities of tomorrow. This applies both when carrying out renewals and in the construction of new infrastructure. The challenges imply a need for a general technology strategy that clarifies goals and guides for technological choices. In this context, the central approaches to problems may include: • The choice of the technological platforms of the future and performance requirements for central facilities and systems • Management of the ageing stock of facilities, in terms of maintenance, prioritisation and pace of renewal • International standardisation and requirements for interoperability • Accelerating development and use of ICT-based railway engineering facilities and systems The strategy has been drawn up primarily for internal use, and shall be used mainly as a basis for investigations and principal plans where alternative technological choices and solutions are to be evaluated, and in the procurement of technical systems and facilities. We assume that the strategy can also be useful in other contexts, such as in conjunction with technical discussions with railway undertakings, suppliers and railway administrations. Anita Skauge Executive Director, Strategic Planning Introduction Technology strategy is a broad term, for signalling systems, energy supply and and initially it was necessary to limit and KVIKT (Kjørevei [Eng: track], Informasjon prioritise in order to make the scope [Eng: information], Kommunikasjon manageable.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies (RICS Code) Contact : [email protected] Reference : Code Short
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/rics code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date of begin validity of end validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV NL 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy FI 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/ 0012 TRFSA Transfesa ES 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 04/10/2016 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD PL 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits FR 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA CH 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA BE 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' RU 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways BY 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi UA 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova MD 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.md/ 0024 LG AB 'Lietuvos geležinkeliai' LT 28/09/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.litrail.lt/ 0025 LDZ Latvijas dzelzceļš LV 19/10/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.ldz.lv/ 0026 EVR Aktsiaselts Eesti Raudtee EE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.evr.ee/ 0027 KTZ Kazakhstan Temir Zholy KZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.railway.ge/ 0028 GR Sakartvelos Rkinigza GE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.ge/ 0029 UTI Uzbekistan Temir Yullari UZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.uzrailway.uz/ 0030 ZC Railways of D.P.R.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Jernbanestatistikk 2002
    JBV_Statistikkreport 1-2.zg 12.06.03 15:33 Side 1 Jernbanestatistikk 2002 1 JBV_Statistikkreport 1-2.zg 12.06.03 15:33 Side 2 Innhold Contents Forord 1 Preface 1 Sammenstilling av nøkkeltall 2002 2 Summary of key figures 2002 2 Det nordiske jernbanenettet 3 The Nordic rail network 3 Nøkkeltall infrastruktur i de nordiske land 3 Nordic railways – key figures 3 Baneprioriteter 4 Line priority 4 Nøkkeltall for det statlige jernbanenettet 5 Key figures for Norway's public rail network 5 Trafikk 6 Traffic 6 Togmengde/togtetthet (person- og godstog) 6 Train density (passenger and freight traffic) 6 Totalt antall tog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 7 Total number of trains per day in Greater Oslo area 7 Persontrafikk 8 Passenger traffic 8 Antall reiser med tog (1000) 8 Passenger journeys (1000) 8 Antall personkilometer (mill.) 9 Passenger-kilometres (million) 9 Totalt antall persontog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 9 Total number of passenger trains per day in Greater Oslo area 9 Reisetid og reiseavstander mellom større byer 10 Journey time and travelling distance between major cities 10 Avstandstabell langs jernbane (km) 10 Distance by rail (km) 10 Raskeste tog på strekningen (tt:mm) 10 Fastest train on route (hh:mm) 10 Reisehastighet for raskeste tog på strekningen, avstand Average speed of fastest train on each route based on regnet langs vei (km/h) 11 road distance (km/h) 11 Utvikling i reisetid for persontog 1960 – 2002 11 Passenger train journey times, 1960–2002 11 Godstrafikk 12 Freight traffic 12 Antall tonn transportert med tog (1000) 12 Tonnes transported by rail (1000) 12 Antall tonnkilometer (mill.) 13 Tonne-kilometres (million) 13 Bruttotonnkilometer pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Håndbok for KOSTRA- Rapportering 2006
    70 Statistisk sentralbyrås håndbøker Returadresse: Statistisk sentralbyrå B NO-2225 Kongsvinger Statistisk sentralbyrå Håndbok for KOSTRA- Oslo: Postboks 8131 Dep rapportering 2006 NO-0033 Oslo Telefon: 21 09 00 00 Telefaks: 21 09 49 73 Oppslagshefte til hjelp ved Kongsvinger: filuttrekk for KOSTRA- NO-2225 Kongsvinger Telefon: 62 88 50 00 rapportering, regnskap Telefaks: 62 88 50 30 Oktober 2006 E-post: [email protected] Internett: www.ssb.no Statistisk sentralbyrå Statistics Norway Forord KOSTRA prosjektet (KOmmune-STat-RApportering) ble iverksatt av Kommunaldepartementet i 1994 som en oppfølging av Stortingsmelding nr. 23 (1992-93) "Om forholdet mellom staten og kommunene". Prosjektperioden ble avsluttet 1.7.2002, og KOSTRA er nå i fullskala drift. KOSTRAs siktemål er tosidig: • Å frambringe relevant, pålitelig og sammenlignbar styringsinformasjon om kommunenes prioriteringer, produktivitet og dekningsgrader. • Å samordne og effektivisere rutinene og løsningene for utveksling av data, slik at statlige og kommunale myndigheter sikres rask og enkel tilgang til data. Rapporteringshåndboken skal være et hjelpemiddel for å sikre at datautvekslingen mellom kommunene og staten blir mest mulig effektiv, slik at begge parter raskere får tilgang til aktuelle data. Det er åttende året en slik rapporteringshåndbok lages. De statlige myndigheter henter inn både tjenestedata og økonomidata. Tjenestedataene skal i størst mulig grad innhentes fra offentlige registre og i lokale forvaltningssystemer ute på tjenestestedene. Tjenestedataene kobles sammen med
    [Show full text]
  • Jernbanestatistikk 2004
    Jernbanestatistikk 2004 1 Innhold Contents Forord 3 Preface 3 Sammenstillig av nøkkeltall 2004 4 Summary of key figures 2004 4 Det nordiske jernbanenettet 5 The Nordic railway network 5 Nøkkeltall infrastruktur i de nordiske land 5 Nordic railways – key figures 5 Baneprioriteter 6 Line priority 6 Nøkkeltall for det statlige jernbanenettet 7 Key figures for Norway’s public rail network 7 Trafikk 8 Traffic 8 Togmengde/togtetthet (person- og godstog) 8 Train density (passenger and freight traffic) 8 Totalt antall tog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 9 Total number of trains per day in Greater Oslo area 9 Persontrafikk 10 Passenger traffic 10 Antall reiser med tog (1000) 10 Passenger journeys (1000) 10 Antall personkilometer (mill.) 11 Passenger-kilometres (million) 11 Totalt antall persontog pr. døgn i Oslo-området 11 Total number of passenger trains per day in Reisetid og reiseavstander mellom større byer 12 Greater Oslo area 11 Avstandstabell langs jernbane (km) 12 Journey time and travelling distance between major cities 12 Raskeste tog på strekningen (tt:mm) 12 Distance by rail (km) 12 Reisehastighet for raskeste tog på strekningen, Fastest train on route (hh:mm) 12 avstand regnet langs vei (km/h) 13 Average speed of fastest train on each route Utvikling i reisetid for persontog 1960 - 2004 13 based on road distance (km/h) 13 Godstrafikk 14 Passenger train journey times, 1960–2004 13 Antall tonn transportert med tog (1000) 14 Freight traffic 14 Antall tonnkilometer (mill.) 15 Tonnes transported by rail (1000) 14 Punktlighet i toggangen 16 Tonne-kilometres (million) 15 Punktlighet i toggangen 2004 16 Train punctuality 16 Utvikling i punktlighet 1993 - 2004 18 Train punctuality 2004 16 Uønskede hendelser 19 Punctuality trends 1993–2004 18 Driftsulykker 19 Incidents 19 Sammenstilling av ulykker 2004 19 Accident 19 Driftsulykker ved togframføring 1993 - 2004 19 Accidents in 2004 19 Dyrepåkjørsler 20 Train-related accidents 1993–2004 19 Dyrepåkjørsler 1997-2004 20 Animal fatalities 20 Dyrepåkjørsler etter art i 2004 20 Animal fatalities 1997-2004 20 Antall elgpåkjørsler pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Høringsliste Jernbane Virksomhet Adresse Postnr/Sted E-Post Org
    Høringsliste jernbane Virksomhet Adresse Postnr/Sted E-post Org. nummer Arbeidstilsynet Postboks 4720 Torgarden 7468 TRONDHEIM [email protected] 974761211 Bane NOR SF Postboks 4350 2308 HAMAR [email protected] 917082308 Bergens Elektriske Sporvei Postboks 812 Sentrum 5807 BERGEN [email protected] 990512469 Boreal Bane AS Postboks 3448 Havstad 7425 TRONDHEIM [email protected] 954653137 Borregaard AS Postboks 162 1701 SARPSBORG [email protected] 895623032 Bybanen AS Kokstadflaten 59 5257 KOKSTAD [email protected] 977511402 CargoNet AS Postboks 1800 Sentrum 0048 OSLO [email protected] 983606598 Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap (DSB) Postboks 2014 3103 TØNSBERG [email protected] 974760983 Etterretningstjenesten Postboks 193 Alnabru bedriftssenter 0614 OSLO 974789221 Flytoget AS Postboks 19 Sentrum 0101 OSLO [email protected] 965694404 Go-Ahead Norge AS v/Yngve Kloster Jernbanetorget 1 0154 OSLO [email protected] 917132577 Green Cargo AB Box 39 17111 Solna, Sverige [email protected] Grenland Rail AS Bølevegen 202 3713 SKIEN [email protected] 988703680 Hector Rail AB Svärdvägen 27 18233 DANDERYD [email protected] Hellik Teigen AS Postboks 2 3301 HOKKSUND [email protected] 941538576 Jernbanedirektoratet Postboks 16 Sentrum 0101 OSLO [email protected] 916810962 Jernbanevirksomhetenes sikkerhetsforening Postboks 7052 Majorstuen 0306 OSLO [email protected] 818315392 Keolis Norge AS Kokstad depot, Kokstadflaten 59 5257 KOKSTAD [email protected] 993050377 LKAB Malmtrafik AB 98186
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Traffic
    Railway Statistics - Synopsis Statistik der Bahnen - Synthese Statistique des chemins de fer - Synthèse Railway Statistics - Synopsis Provisional results StatistikVorläufige der Bahnen Ergebnisse - Synthese Résultats provisoires Statistique des chemins de fer - Synthèse 2019 Edition Provisional results Vorläufige Ergebnisse Résultats provisoires Length of lines worked at end of year Stock at end of year Train performance Revenue rail traffic (3) Surface area Population Population Locomotives Average staff strength Passenger Freight Railway of which double of which Railcars and Train Gross train Country km² (1) (1) density Total including Light Coaches & Railway's Passengers carried Passenger.kilometres Tonnes carried Tonne.kilometres company track or more electrified lines Multiple kilometres tonne. kilometres Rail trailers (2) wagons D% D% D% D% D% Units thousands millions millions millions millions thousands millions inhab./km² in kilometres Motortractors 18/17 millions 18/17 18/17 18/17 18/17 Europe (including Turkey) Europa 346 258 144 184 182 414 40 596 55 062 100 363 553 182 2 075 5 101 6 253 464 8 012 618 139 2 827 3 127 196 EU UE 208 138 87 546 113 445 15 979 44 234 85 150 249 468 974 3 079 916 529 5 979 427 393 801 250 372 Austria 83,88 8,80 104,88 GKB (2018) 91 0 0 na na na na na na na na ÖBB (2018) 4 864 2 155 3 560 1 013 555 2 818 17 576 42,16 1,14 133,87 62 157 261,41 6,41 11 477 2,63 112,96 50,98 31 732 WB (2018) na na na na na na na 6,55 34,64 1 100 31,58 WLB CARGO (2017) na na na 4,71 674 Belgium 30,53 11,38 372,83 INFRABEL
    [Show full text]