DOCSLIB.ORG

Dod Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dod Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 ENCLOSURE 1 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AND RELATED AGENCIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND FOR SUPPORT TO U.S. ELEMENTS Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent A. NATO 1. NATO Military Committee Agencies a. International Military Staff (IMS) Army (Brussels BE) b. Permanent Military Representatives to NATO Army (Brussels BE) c. Canada - U.S. Regional Planning Group Army (Brussels BE) 2. NATO Organizations and Agencies a. NATO Communications, Command and Control Air Force Agency (NC3A) (The Hague NL) b. Military Agency for Standardization (MAS) Army (Brussels BE) c. NATO Defense College Navy (Rome IT) d. NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) Army (Luxemburg) f. NATO Hawk Management Office Army (Ruell-Malmaison FR) g. NATO ACCS Management Agency (NACMA) Army (Brussels BE) h. NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Army Programme Management Agency (NAPMA) (Brunssum NL) 9-1 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent i. NATO Airborne Early Warning Force Command Army (Mons BE) j. NATO Airborne Early Warning Main Operating Base Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) k. NATO CE-3A Component Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) l. NATO Research and Technology Organization (RTO) Air Force (Nueilly-sur-Seine FR) l. NATO School Army (Oberammergau GE) m. NATO CIS Operating and Support Agency (NACOSA) Army (Glons BE) n. NATO Communication and Information Systems School Navy (NCISS) (Latina, IT) o. NATO Pipeline Committee (NPC) Army (Glons BE) p. NATO Regional Operating Center Atlantic Navy (ROCLANT)/NACOSA Support Element (NSE) West (Oeiras PO) 3. Allied Command Europe a. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe Army (SHAPE) (Mons BE) (1) Regional Signal Support Group Army (Mons BE) (2) ACE Information Security Army (Mons BE) (3) ACE Counterintelligence Army (Mons BE) 9-2 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (4) Information Systems Support Center (ISSC) Army (Mons BE) (5) Combined Joint Planning Staff (CJPS) Army (Mons BE) (6) Partnership Coordination Cell (PCC) Army (Mons BE) b. Regional HQ Allied Forces Northern Europe Army (Brunnsum NL) (1) HQ Allied Naval Forces Northern Europe Navy (Northwoods UK) (2) HQ Allied Air Forces Northern Europe Air Force (Ramstein GE) (3) Joint Command HQ Northern Europe Air Force (Stavanger NO) (4) Joint Command HQ Northeast Europe Air Force (Karup DE) (5) Joint Command HQ Central Europe Army (Heidelberg GE) d. Regional HQ Allied Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples IT) (1) HQ Allied Naval Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples IT) (2) HQ Allied Air Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples IT) (3) Joint Command HQ Southern Europe Army (Verona IT) (4) Joint Command HQ Southwest Europe Navy (Madrid SP) 9-3 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (5) Joint Command HQ South Central Europe Navy (Larissa GR) (6) Joint Command HQ Southeast Europe Air Force (Izmir TU) e. Allied Mobile Forces – Land Army (Heidelberg GE) f. Multinational HQ and Reaction Force HQ (1) Combined Air Operations Center #9 Navy (High Wycombe UK) (2) Combined Air Operations Center #2 Air Force (Kalkar/Uedem GE) (3) Combined Air Operations Center #5 Army (Poggio Renatico IT) (4) Combined Air Operations Center #6 Air Force (Eskesehir TU) (5) Combined Air Operations Center #7 Navy (Larissa GR) (6) Combined Air Operations Center #8 Navy (Torrejon SP) (7) Combined Air Operations Center #10 Navy (Monsanto PO) (8) Deployable Combined Air Operations Air Force Center #1 (DCAOC 1) (Uedem GE) (9) Deployable Combined Air Operations Army Center #2 (DCAOC 2) (Poggio Renatico IT) (10) Deployable ARS Southern Europe Air Force (Moron SP) 9-4 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (11) Deployable ARS Northern Europe Army (Venlo NL) (12) HQ Submarines Southern Region Navy (Naples IT) (13) HQ Maritime Air Forces Southern Region Navy (Naples IT) (14) HQ ACE Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) Army (Rheindahlen GE) (15) HQ Reaction Force Air Staff (RFAS) Air Force (Kalkar GE) (16) HQ II German Corps Army (Ulm GE) (17) HQ Naval Striking and Support Forces Navy Southern Europe (Naples IT) (18) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - TU Air Force (Istanbul TU) (19) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - IT Army (Milan IT) (20) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - GE/NL Army (Munster GE) (21) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - SP Navy (Valencia SP) (22) High Readiness Force (Maritime) HQ - SP Navy (Rota, SP) (23) High Readiness Force (Maritime) HQ – UK Navy (Portsmouth, UK) 4. Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic (SACLANT) Navy a. HQ, WESTLANT Navy 9-5 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (1) HQ, OCEANLANT Navy (2) HQ, CANLANT Navy (3) HQ, SUBWESTLANT Navy b. RHQ, EASTLANT Navy (Northwoods UK) (1) HQ, NORLANT Navy (2) HQ, CENTLANT Navy (3) HQ, MARAIREASTLANT Navy (4) HQ, SUBEASTLANT Navy (5) HQ, ISCOMICELAND Navy c. RHQ, SOUTHLANT Navy (Oieras PO) d. HQ, SUBACLANT Navy e. HQ, STRIKFLTLANT Navy (1) HQ, CARSTRIKFOR Navy (2) HQ, ASWSTRIKFOR Navy (3) HQ, PHIBSTRIKFOR Navy f. SACLANT Undersea Research Center (SACLANTCEN) Navy (La Spezia, IT) 5. Allied Command Channel (ACCHAN) Navy a. Benelux Subarea Navy b. Maritime Air - Nore Subarea Navy c. Allied Maritime Air Force Channel Navy 9-6 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent d. Maritime Air-Plymouth Subarea Navy e. Standing Naval Force - Channel Navy B. Inter-American Defense Board (IADB) Army C. Joint Mexican-United States Defense Commission Army (JMUSDC) D. Permanent Joint Board on Defense, Canada- Air Force United States (PJBD) E. U.S.-Spanish Combined Military Coordination Air Force and Planning Staff (CMCPS) F. Republic of Korea/United States Combined Forces Army Command (ROK/US) 9-7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Military Staff, Is to Provide the Best Possible C3 Staff Executive Operations, Strategic Military Advice and Staff Support for the Military Committee
    Director General of IMS Public Affairs & Financial Controller StratCom Executive Coordinator Advisor Legal Office HR Office NATO Office Support Activities on Gender Perspectives SITCEN Cooperation NATO Intelligence Operations Plans & Policy & Regional Logistics Headquarters Security & Resources C3 Staff Intelligence Major Operation Strategic Policy Partnership Concepts Logistics Branch Executive Production Branch Alpha & Concepts & Policy Branch Coordination Office Branch Intelligence Policy Joint Operations Nuclear Special Partnerships Medical Branch Information Services Branch & Plans Branch & CBRN Defence Branch Branch Education Training Defence and Regional Partnerships Plans, Policy & Exercise & Evaluation Force Planning Armaments Branch Branch Branch Architecture Branch Air & Missile Infrastructure & Spectrum & C3 Defence Branch Finance Branch Infrastructure Branch Operations, Manpower Branch Requirements, & Plans Branch NATO Defence Information Assurance Consists of military/civilian staff from member nations. Manpower & Cyber Defence Personnel work in international capacity for the common interest of the Alliance. Audit Authority Branch www.nato.int/ims e-mail :[email protected] Brussels–Belgium 1110 HQ, NATO Office,InternationalMilitaryStaff, Affairs the Public For moreinformationcontact: NATO HQ. NATO and the moveto thenew NATO are adaptedtoreflect Future ‘ways ofworking’ changes are not it likely, will be important that the IMS is reconfigured and its a review of the IMS Summit, Chicago the was at direction initiated. Government and State While of Heads major the Following structural and organizational respected andthatistotallyfreefromdiscriminationprejudice. is individual each which in environment an in communication open and initiative resilience, for need the and learning continuous promote also They commitment. first, Mission always.’ Our peopleThe workIMS with professionalism,team integrityembraces and the principles and values enshrined Values in ‘People decisiveness andpride.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO 20/2020: Twenty Bold Ideas to Reimagine the Alliance After The
    NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION NATO 2O/2O2O The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Transatlantic Security Initiative brings together top policymakers, government and military officials, business leaders, and experts from Europe and North America to share insights, strengthen cooperation, and develop innovative approaches to the key challenges facing NATO and the transatlantic community. This publication was produced in partnership with NATO’s Public Diplomacy Division under the auspices of a project focused on revitalizing public support for the Alliance. NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION Editor-in-Chief Christopher Skaluba Project and Editorial Director Conor Rodihan Research and Editorial Support Gabriela R. A. Doyle NATO 2O/2O2O Table of Contents 02 Foreword 56 Design a Digital Marshall Plan by Christopher Skaluba by The Hon. Ruben Gallego and The Hon. Vicky Hartzler 03 Modernize the Kit and the Message by H.E. Dame Karen Pierce DCMG 60 Build Resilience for an Era of Shocks 08 Build an Atlantic Pacific by Jim Townsend and Anca Agachi Partnership by James Hildebrand, Harry W.S. Lee, 66 Ramp Up on Russia Fumika Mizuno, Miyeon Oh, and by Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas L. Baptiste, Lieutenant General, United States Air Force
    Thomas L. Baptiste, Lieutenant General, United States Air Force (Ret) President/Executive Director, National Center for Simulation Partnership III, 3039 Technology Parkway, Suite 213, Orlando, FL 32826 Lt. Gen. Thomas L. Baptiste completed his 34 year military career as the Deputy Chairman, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Military Committee, Brussels, Belgium. The NATO Military Committee is the highest military authority in NATO and provides direction and advice on military policy and strategy to the North Atlantic Council, guidance to the NATO strategic commanders, and support to the development of strategic concepts for the Alliance. In this role, Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste also served as the second most senior military advisor to the NATO Secretary General. Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste graduated from California State University, Chico, CA in June 1973 and earned a Graduate Degree from Golden Gate University, San Francisco, CA in 1986. Following commissioning from the Officer Training School, he was initially trained as a Navigator/Weapons Systems Officer and assigned to the F-4 in 1974. After one overseas operational tour he was competitively selected for Undergraduate Pilot Training and returned to the F-4 as a Pilot in 1978. In 1981, Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste was handpicked to become part of the initial cadre of Instructor Pilots to stand-up the F-16 Training Wing at MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL. Several other F-16 assignments followed including Commander, 72nd Fighter Training Squadron and Commander 52nd Operations Group. During two staff assignments in Washington D.C., he served as: the Director of Operations, Defense Nuclear Agency, and as the Assistant Deputy Director, International Negotiations, Directorate of Plans and Policy (J-5), the Joint Staff in the Pentagon.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018
    NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018 A stronger and more agile Alliance The Brussels Summit comes at a crucial moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. It will be an important opportunity to chart NATO’s path for the years ahead. In a changing world, NATO is adapting to be a more agile, responsive and innovative Alliance, while defending all of its members against any threat. NATO remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. At the Brussels Summit, the Alliance will make important decisions to further boost security in and around Europe, including through strengthened deterrence and defence, projecting stability and fighting terrorism, enhancing its partnership with the European Union, modernising the Alliance and achieving fairer burden-sharing. This Summit will be held in the new NATO Headquarters, a modern and sustainable home for a forward-looking Alliance. It will be the third meeting of Allied Heads of State and Government chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. + Summit meetings + Member countries + Partners + NATO Secretary General Archived material – Information valid up to 10 July 2018 1 NATO Summit Guide, Brussels 2018 I. Strengthening deterrence and defence NATO’s primary purpose is to protect its almost one billion citizens and to preserve peace and freedom. NATO must also be vigilant against a wide range of new threats, be they in the form of computer code, disinformation or foreign fighters. The Alliance has taken important steps to strengthen its collective defence and deterrence, so that it can respond to threats from any direction.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016
    NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016 An essential Alliance in a more dangerous world The Warsaw Summit comes at a defining moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. In recent years, the world has become more volatile and dangerous with Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and destabilisation of eastern Ukraine, as well as its military build-up from the Barents Sea to the Baltic, and from the Black Sea to the eastern Mediterranean; turmoil across the Middle East and North Africa, fuelling the biggest migrant and refugee crisis in Europe since World War Two; brutal attacks by ISIL and other terrorist groups, as well as cyber attacks, nuclear proliferation and ballistic missile threats. NATO is adapting to this changed security environment. It also remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. And, in the Polish capital, the Alliance will make important decisions to boost security in and around Europe, based on two key pillars: protecting its citizens through modern deterrence and defence, and projecting stability beyond its borders. NATO member states form a unique community of values, committed to the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. In today’s dangerous world, transatlantic cooperation is needed more than ever. NATO embodies that cooperation, bringing to bear the strength and unity of North America and Europe. This Summit is the first to be hosted in Poland and the first to be chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who took up his post in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Military Committee
    The International Military Staff (IMS) Six functional areas The IMS supports the Military Committee, with about The Military Committee oversees several of the IMS 400 dedicated military and civilian personnel working in operations and missions including the: an international capacity for the common interest of the Plans and Policy Alliance, rather than on behalf of their country of origin. ➤ International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan (ISAF). Responsible for strategic level plans Under the direction of the Director General, Lt.Gen. NATO is operating throughout Afghanistan with about 130,000 and policies, and defence/force Jürgen Bornemann, the staff prepare assessments, military personnel there under its command. ISAF has responsibility for, among other things, the provision of security, planning, including working with evaluations and reports on all issues that form the basis nations to determine national military Provincial Reconstruction Teams and training the Afghan of discussion and decisions in the MC. National Security Forces, known as the NATO Training Mission – NATO’s Military levels of ambition regarding force goals and contributions to NATO. Afghanistan (NTM-A). Supporting the transfer of responsibility The IMS is also responsible for planning, assessing for security to Afghan Authorities will remain a priority. Operations and recommending policy on military matters for ➤ Kosovo Force (KFOR). Since June 1999 NATO has led a Operation Active Endeavour is NATO’s Committee Closely tracks current operations, consideration by the Military Committee, and for peacekeeping operation in Kosovo. Initially composed of 50,000 maritime surveillance and escort operation staffs operational planning, follows ensuring their policies and decisions are implemented following the March 1999 air campaign, the force now numbers in the fight against terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
    The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning.
    [Show full text]
  • CRPT-105Erpt14.Pdf
    105TH CONGRESS EXEC. RPT. 2d Session SENATE 105±14 "! PROTOCOLS TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY OF 1949 ON ACCESSION OF POLAND, HUNGARY, AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC MARCH 6, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed Mr. HELMS, from the Committee on Foreign Relations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany Treaty Doc. 105±36] The Committee on Foreign Relations to which was referred the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on Accession of Po- land, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, which were opened for sig- nature at Brussels on December 16, 1997, and signed on behalf of the United States of America and other parties to the North Atlan- tic Treaty, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the Senate give its advice and consent to ratification thereof subject to seven declarations and four condi- tions as set forth in this report and the accompanying resolution of ratification. CONTENTS Page I. The Future of NATO and the Enlargement of the Alliance ....................... 2 II. Qualifications of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic for NATO Membership ................................................................................................ 8 III. The Cost of NATO Enlargement .................................................................. 17 IV. NATO-Russia Relations ................................................................................. 23 V. Senate Action ................................................................................................. 28 VI. Resolution of Ratification .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Encyclopedia 2017
    This is a compilation of archived online topic pages which explain every aspect of NATO: its origin and fundamental security tasks, policies and decision-making processes, peace support and crisis management operations and how the Alliance tackles threats and develops capabilities. They also cover NATO’s partnerships and cooperative activities, its civilian and military structures, and specialised organisations and agencies, as well as the Organization’s wider activities. The topic pages were archived as they appeared online on 15 December 2017. You can either access them via an alphabetical index, which provides a comprehensive list of all online topic pages, or via a thematic overview, which groups the principal topics by area of interest. For up-to-date information, please visit the Encyclopediahttp://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics.htm of NATO Topics online. NATO Public Diplomacy Division NATO Headquarters Brussels, Belgium NATO Encyclopedia 2017 December 2017 2 Alphabetical index A – Operation Active Endeavour (Archived) – NATO Administrative Tribunal – Afghanistan and NATO – Afghanistan, NATO-led Resolute Support Mission in - – Afghanistan, NATO’s Senior Civilian Representative in - – ISAF’s mission in Afghanistan (2001-2014) (Archived) – Inteqal: Transition to Afghan lead – SILK-Afghanistan – Agencies and organisations – Assistance for the refugee and migrant crisis in the Aegean Sea – Assistance to the African Union (AU) – Air and Missile Defence, Integrated - – Air and Missile Defence Committee (AMDC) – NATO Airborne Early
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 2019 Final Communiqué
    th 34 ​ Annual Model NATO ​ Washington, D.C. th th February 14 ​ – 17 ,​ 2019 ​ ​ 2019 Final Communiqué Be it hereby resolved that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization: North Atlantic Council (NAC I/A - Task ESC) 1. Tasks the Committee on Emerging Security Challenges with development of a unified ​ cyber security policy framework for the Alliance, including stipulations for: a. Development of an actionable plan for improving cyber defense across member states, b. Interoperability between NATO states, c. Shared offensive capabilities, d. Defining qualifications for a cyber attack warranting a response by Article V, as well as cyber deterrence, e. Cooperation between private entities and governments to develop cyber security across all industries, f. Developing concerted efforts to leverage the Cooperative Cyber Defence Center of Excellence (CyOc), located in Tallinn, Estonia, as a capacity building home-base to assist Member States in developing their cyber defense and internal security structures, g. Further using the CyOc as a resource to assist Member States in meeting their Cyber Defence Pledges, as drafted in 2016, to enhance their cyber defenses, h. Improving the response capabilities of the NATO Cyber Rapid Reaction teams for quicker provisions of assistance in response and recovery in aftermath of cyber attacks, and i. Improving situational awareness, utilizing the new Cyberspace Operations Centre (CyOc) in Mons, Belgium, as part of NATO’s strengthened Command Structure, operational starting from 2023; 2. Requests that the Committee on Emerging Security Challenges prioritizes this task over ​ other agenda items and points of discussion; 3. Necessitates that this product is created by the Committee On Emerging Security ​ Challenges by the end of debate on 15 February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
    Reagan Library Topic Guide – NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) Reagan Library topic guides are created by the Library staff from textual material currently available for research use. Material cited in the topic guides come from these collections: White House Staff and Office Collections White House Office of Records Management (WHORM) Subject Files White House Office of Records Management (WHORM) Alphabetical Files. The folders and case files listed on these topic guides may still have withdrawn material due to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) restrictions. Most frequently withdrawn material includes national security classified material, personal privacy issues, protection of the President, etc. NATO (NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION) WHORM SUBJECT FILE IT067 (Entire Category) (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) IT067-01 (Entire Category) (Atlantic Ocean Command, European Command - NATO) IT067-02 (Entire Category) (North Atlantic Council, NATO) IT067-03 (Entire Category) (Committee on Challenges of the Modern Society) IT067-04 (Entire Category) (North Atlantic Assembly) MA020 case files 206393, 242154 ME001-02 case file 038072 ND007-06 case file 081056 WHITE HOUSE STAFF AND OFFICE FILES CHIEF OF STAFF, OFFICE OF THE Baker, Howard: Files Box 4 NATO Summit [Cabinet Meeting] 03/08/1988 Duberstein, Kenneth: Files (Chief of Staff) Box 3 [NATO Summit: The President’s Trip to the NATO Summit, Brussels, Belgium, 03/02/1988-03/03/1988] (1)-(4) MEDIA RELATIONS, OFFICE OF Board, Elizabeth: Files Box 26 Post NATO Summit Interviews -
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Committee Focussed on Operations, Capabilities and Cooperation
    The Military Committee focussed on operations, capabilities and cooperation. Chairman’s Report General Ray Henault 2005 - 2008 Chairman’s Report 2005 - 2008 Table of content Foreword by the Chairman of the Military Committee ............................... 2 A Dynamic Alliance – Facing Challenges and Meeting Demands ..................5 Expanding Operations ........................................................................................... 6 Improving Capabilities - Transformation .............................................................. 10 Enhancing Cooperation ....................................................................................... 13 The Years Ahead – Preparing for Future Challenges .................................. 16 Operations ........................................................................................................... 17 Capabilities .......................................................................................................... 18 Cooperation ......................................................................................................... 19 Conclusion ........................................................................................................20 Chairman’s Report 2005 - 2008 1 Foreword by the Chairman of the Military Committee his short overview of the work of the Standing in Red Square last summer with the Military Committee and its executive agent, Russian Chief of Defence, as an honour guard in T the International Military Staff, comes in perfect formation
    [Show full text]