DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 CHAPTER 9 +ANNEX 1 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AND RELATED AGENCIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND FOR SUPPORT TO U.S. ELEMENTS Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent A. NATO 1. NATO Military Committee Agencies a. International Military Staff (IMS) Army (Brussels, BE) b. Permanent Military Representatives to NATO Army (Brussels, BE) c. Canada - U.S. Regional Planning Group Army (Brussels, BE) 2. NATO Organizations and Agencies a. NATO Communications, Command and Control Air Force Agency (NC3A) (The Hague, NL) b. Military Agency for Standardization (MAS) Army (Brussels, BE) c. NATO Defense College Navy (Rome, IT) d. NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) Army (Luxemburg) f. NATO Hawk Management Office Army (Ruell-Malmaison, FR) g. NATO ACCS Management Agency (NACMA) Army (Brussels, BE) 9-1-1 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent h. NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Army Programme Management Agency (NAPMA) (Brunssum, NL) i. NATO Airborne Early Warning Force Command Army (Mons, BE) j. NATO Airborne Early Warning Main Operating Base Air Force (Geilenkirchen, GE) k. NATO CE-3A Component Air Force (Geilenkirchen, GE) l. NATO Research and Technology Organization (RTO) Air Force (Nueilly-sur-Seine, FR) m. NATO School Army (Oberammergau, GE) n. NATO CIS Operating and Support Agency (NACOSA) Army (Glons, BE) o. NATO Communication and Information Systems School Navy (NCISS) (Latina, IT) p. NATO Pipeline Committee (NPC) Army (Glons, BE) q. NATO Regional Operating Center Atlantic Navy (ROCLANT)/NACOSA Support Element (NSE) West (Oeiras, PO) 3. Allied Command Europe a. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe Army (SHAPE) (Mons, BE) (1) Regional Signal Support Group Army (Mons, BE) (2) ACE Information Security Army (Mons, BE) 9-1-2 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (3) ACE Counterintelligence Army (Mons, BE) (4) Information Systems Support Center (ISSC) Army (Mons, BE) (5) Combined Joint Planning Staff (CJPS) Army (Mons, BE) (6) Partnership Coordination Cell (PCC) Army (Mons, BE) b. Regional HQ Allied Forces Northern Europe Army (Brunnsum, NL) (1) HQ Allied Naval Forces Northern Europe Navy (Northwoods, UK) (2) HQ Allied Air Forces Northern Europe Air Force (Ramstein, GE) (3) Joint Command HQ Northern Europe Air Force (Stavanger, NO) (4) Joint Command HQ Northeast Europe Air Force (Karup, DE) (5) Joint Command HQ Central Europe Army (Heidelberg, GE) d. Regional HQ Allied Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples, IT) (1) HQ Allied Naval Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples, IT) (2) HQ Allied Air Forces Southern Europe Navy (Naples, IT) (3) Joint Command HQ Southern Europe Army (Verona, IT) 9-1-3 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agent Agency (4) Joint Command HQ Southwest Europe Navy (Madrid, SP) (5) Joint Command HQ South Central Europe Navy (Larissa, GR) (6) Joint Command HQ Southeast Europe Air Force (Izmir, TU) e. Allied Mobile Forces – Land Army (Heidelberg, GE) f. Multinational HQ and Reaction Force HQ (1) Combined Air Operations Center #9 Navy (High Wycombe, UK) (2) Combined Air Operations Center #2 Air Force (Kalkar/Uedem, GE) (3) Combined Air Operations Center #5 Army (Poggio Renatico, IT) (4) Combined Air Operations Center #6 Air Force (Eskesehir, TU) (5) Combined Air Operations Center #7 Navy (Larissa, GR) (6) Combined Air Operations Center #8 Navy (Torrejon, SP) (7) Combined Air Operations Center #10 Navy (Monsanto, PO) (8) Deployable Combined Air Operations Air Force Center #1 (DCAOC 1) (Uedem, GE) (9) Deployable Combined Air Operations Army Center #2 (DCAOC 2) (Poggio Renatico, IT) 9-1-4 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent (10) Deployable ARS Southern Europe Air Force (Moron, SP) (11) Deployable ARS Northern Europe Army (Venlo, NL) (12) HQ Submarines Southern Region Navy (Naples, IT) (13) HQ Maritime Air Forces Southern Region Navy (Naples, IT) (14) HQ ACE Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) Army (Rheindahlen, GE) (15) HQ Reaction Force Air Staff (RFAS) Air Force (Kalkar, GE) (16) HQ II German Corps Army (Ulm, GE) (17) HQ Naval Striking and Support Forces Navy Southern Europe (Naples, IT) (18) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - TU Air Force (Istanbul, TU) (19) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - IT Army (Milan, IT) (20) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - GE/NL Army (Munster, GE) (21) High Readiness Force (Land) HQ - SP Navy (Valencia, SP) (22) High Readiness Force (Maritime) HQ - SP Navy (Rota, SP) (23) High Readiness Force (Maritime) HQ – UK Navy (Portsmouth, UK) 9-1-5 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent +(24) High Readiness Force (Maritime) HQ – IT Navy (Taranto, IT) 4. Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic (SACLANT) Navy a. HQ, WESTLANT Navy (1) HQ, OCEANLANT Navy (2) HQ, CANLANT Navy (3) HQ, SUBWESTLANT Navy b. RHQ, EASTLANT Navy (Northwoods, UK) (1) HQ, NORLANT Navy (2) HQ, CENTLANT Navy (3) HQ, MARAIREASTLANT Navy (4) HQ, SUBEASTLANT Navy (5) HQ, ISCOMICELAND Navy c. RHQ, SOUTHLANT Navy (Oieras, PO) d. HQ, SUBACLANT Navy e. HQ, STRIKFLTLANT Navy (1) HQ, CARSTRIKFOR Navy (2) HQ, ASWSTRIKFOR Navy (3) HQ, PHIBSTRIKFOR Navy f. SACLANT Undersea Research Center (SACLANTCEN) Navy (La Spezia, IT) 9-1-6 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Annex 1 + October 2002 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent 5. Allied Command Channel (ACCHAN) Navy a. Benelux Subarea Navy b. Maritime Air - Nore Subarea Navy c. Allied Maritime Air Force Channel Navy d. Maritime Air-Plymouth Subarea Navy e. Standing Naval Force - Channel Navy B. Inter-American Defense Board (IADB) Army C. Joint Mexican-United States Defense Commission Army (JMUSDC) D. Permanent Joint Board on Defense, Canada- Air Force United States (PJBD) E. U.S.-Spanish Combined Military Coordination Air Force and Planning Staff (CMCPS) F. Republic of Korea/United States Combined Forces Army Command (ROK/US) 9-1-7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Military Staff, Is to Provide the Best Possible C3 Staff Executive Operations, Strategic Military Advice and Staff Support for the Military Committee
    Director General of IMS Public Affairs & Financial Controller StratCom Executive Coordinator Advisor Legal Office HR Office NATO Office Support Activities on Gender Perspectives SITCEN Cooperation NATO Intelligence Operations Plans & Policy & Regional Logistics Headquarters Security & Resources C3 Staff Intelligence Major Operation Strategic Policy Partnership Concepts Logistics Branch Executive Production Branch Alpha & Concepts & Policy Branch Coordination Office Branch Intelligence Policy Joint Operations Nuclear Special Partnerships Medical Branch Information Services Branch & Plans Branch & CBRN Defence Branch Branch Education Training Defence and Regional Partnerships Plans, Policy & Exercise & Evaluation Force Planning Armaments Branch Branch Branch Architecture Branch Air & Missile Infrastructure & Spectrum & C3 Defence Branch Finance Branch Infrastructure Branch Operations, Manpower Branch Requirements, & Plans Branch NATO Defence Information Assurance Consists of military/civilian staff from member nations. Manpower & Cyber Defence Personnel work in international capacity for the common interest of the Alliance. Audit Authority Branch www.nato.int/ims e-mail :[email protected] Brussels–Belgium 1110 HQ, NATO Office,InternationalMilitaryStaff, Affairs the Public For moreinformationcontact: NATO HQ. NATO and the moveto thenew NATO are adaptedtoreflect Future ‘ways ofworking’ changes are not it likely, will be important that the IMS is reconfigured and its a review of the IMS Summit, Chicago the was at direction initiated. Government and State While of Heads major the Following structural and organizational respected andthatistotallyfreefromdiscriminationprejudice. is individual each which in environment an in communication open and initiative resilience, for need the and learning continuous promote also They commitment. first, Mission always.’ Our peopleThe workIMS with professionalism,team integrityembraces and the principles and values enshrined Values in ‘People decisiveness andpride.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO 20/2020: Twenty Bold Ideas to Reimagine the Alliance After The
    NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION NATO 2O/2O2O The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. The Scowcroft Center’s Transatlantic Security Initiative brings together top policymakers, government and military officials, business leaders, and experts from Europe and North America to share insights, strengthen cooperation, and develop innovative approaches to the key challenges facing NATO and the transatlantic community. This publication was produced in partnership with NATO’s Public Diplomacy Division under the auspices of a project focused on revitalizing public support for the Alliance. NATO 2O / 2O2O TWENTY BOLD IDEAS TO REIMAGINE THE ALLIANCE AFTER THE 2020 US ELECTION Editor-in-Chief Christopher Skaluba Project and Editorial Director Conor Rodihan Research and Editorial Support Gabriela R. A. Doyle NATO 2O/2O2O Table of Contents 02 Foreword 56 Design a Digital Marshall Plan by Christopher Skaluba by The Hon. Ruben Gallego and The Hon. Vicky Hartzler 03 Modernize the Kit and the Message by H.E. Dame Karen Pierce DCMG 60 Build Resilience for an Era of Shocks 08 Build an Atlantic Pacific by Jim Townsend and Anca Agachi Partnership by James Hildebrand, Harry W.S. Lee, 66 Ramp Up on Russia Fumika Mizuno, Miyeon Oh, and by Amb.
    [Show full text]
  • Dod Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9
    DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 ENCLOSURE 1 INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AND RELATED AGENCIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR SUPPORT AND FOR SUPPORT TO U.S. ELEMENTS Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent A. NATO 1. NATO Military Committee Agencies a. International Military Staff (IMS) Army (Brussels BE) b. Permanent Military Representatives to NATO Army (Brussels BE) c. Canada - U.S. Regional Planning Group Army (Brussels BE) 2. NATO Organizations and Agencies a. NATO Communications, Command and Control Air Force Agency (NC3A) (The Hague NL) b. Military Agency for Standardization (MAS) Army (Brussels BE) c. NATO Defense College Navy (Rome IT) d. NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA) Army (Luxemburg) f. NATO Hawk Management Office Army (Ruell-Malmaison FR) g. NATO ACCS Management Agency (NACMA) Army (Brussels BE) h. NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Army Programme Management Agency (NAPMA) (Brunssum NL) 9-1 DoD Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9, Change 2 December 2001 Administrative Headquarters or Agency Agent i. NATO Airborne Early Warning Force Command Army (Mons BE) j. NATO Airborne Early Warning Main Operating Base Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) k. NATO CE-3A Component Air Force (Geilenkirchen GE) l. NATO Research and Technology Organization (RTO) Air Force (Nueilly-sur-Seine FR) l. NATO School Army (Oberammergau GE) m. NATO CIS Operating and Support Agency (NACOSA) Army (Glons BE) n. NATO Communication and Information Systems School Navy (NCISS) (Latina, IT) o. NATO Pipeline Committee (NPC) Army (Glons BE) p. NATO Regional Operating Center Atlantic Navy (ROCLANT)/NACOSA Support Element (NSE) West (Oeiras PO) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs
    Jeremy Stöhs ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. Jeremy Stöhs is the Deputy Director of the Austrian Center for Intelligence, Propaganda and Security Studies (ACIPSS) and a Non-Resident Fellow at the Institute for Security Policy, HOW HIGH? Kiel University. His research focuses on U.S. and European defence policy, maritime strategy and security, as well as public THE FUTURE OF security and safety. EUROPEAN NAVAL POWER AND THE HIGH-END CHALLENGE ISBN 978875745035-4 DJØF PUBLISHING IN COOPERATION WITH 9 788757 450354 CENTRE FOR MILITARY STUDIES How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge Djøf Publishing In cooperation with Centre for Military Studies 2021 Jeremy Stöhs How High? The Future of European Naval Power and the High-End Challenge © 2021 by Djøf Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior written permission of the Publisher. This publication is peer reviewed according to the standards set by the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science. Cover: Morten Lehmkuhl Print: Ecograf Printed in Denmark 2021 ISBN 978-87-574-5035-4 Djøf Publishing Gothersgade 137 1123 København K Telefon: 39 13 55 00 e-mail: [email protected] www. djoef-forlag.dk Editors’ preface The publications of this series present new research on defence and se- curity policy of relevance to Danish and international decision-makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.THE IMPACT of NATO on the SPANISH AIR FORCE
    UNISCI Discussion Papers ISSN: 1696-2206 [email protected] Universidad Complutense de Madrid España Yaniz Velasco, Federico THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS UNISCI Discussion Papers, núm. 22, enero, 2010, pp. 224-244 Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=76712438014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative UNISCI Discussion Papers, Nº 22 (January / Enero 2010) ISSN 1696-2206 THE IMPACT OF NATO ON THE SPANISH AIR FORCE: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND FUTURE PROSPECTS Federico Yaniz Velasco 1 Brigadier General, Spanish Air Force (Retired) Abstract: The Spanish Air Force is one of the oldest independent Air Forces in the world and the youngest service of the Spanish Armed Forces. Since the early 50’s of the last century it was very much involved in exercises and training with the United States Air Force following the Agreements that Spain signed with the United States in 1953. That is why when Spain joined NATO in 1982 the Spanish Air Force was already somewhat familiar with NATO doctrine and procedures. In the following years, cooperation with NATO was increased dramatically through exercises and, when necessary, in operations. The Spanish Air Force is now ready and well prepared to contribute to the common defence of NATO nations and to participate in NATO led operations whenever the Spanish government decides to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas L. Baptiste, Lieutenant General, United States Air Force
    Thomas L. Baptiste, Lieutenant General, United States Air Force (Ret) President/Executive Director, National Center for Simulation Partnership III, 3039 Technology Parkway, Suite 213, Orlando, FL 32826 Lt. Gen. Thomas L. Baptiste completed his 34 year military career as the Deputy Chairman, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Military Committee, Brussels, Belgium. The NATO Military Committee is the highest military authority in NATO and provides direction and advice on military policy and strategy to the North Atlantic Council, guidance to the NATO strategic commanders, and support to the development of strategic concepts for the Alliance. In this role, Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste also served as the second most senior military advisor to the NATO Secretary General. Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste graduated from California State University, Chico, CA in June 1973 and earned a Graduate Degree from Golden Gate University, San Francisco, CA in 1986. Following commissioning from the Officer Training School, he was initially trained as a Navigator/Weapons Systems Officer and assigned to the F-4 in 1974. After one overseas operational tour he was competitively selected for Undergraduate Pilot Training and returned to the F-4 as a Pilot in 1978. In 1981, Lt Gen (Ret) Baptiste was handpicked to become part of the initial cadre of Instructor Pilots to stand-up the F-16 Training Wing at MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL. Several other F-16 assignments followed including Commander, 72nd Fighter Training Squadron and Commander 52nd Operations Group. During two staff assignments in Washington D.C., he served as: the Director of Operations, Defense Nuclear Agency, and as the Assistant Deputy Director, International Negotiations, Directorate of Plans and Policy (J-5), the Joint Staff in the Pentagon.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018
    NATO Summit Guide Brussels, 11-12 July 2018 A stronger and more agile Alliance The Brussels Summit comes at a crucial moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. It will be an important opportunity to chart NATO’s path for the years ahead. In a changing world, NATO is adapting to be a more agile, responsive and innovative Alliance, while defending all of its members against any threat. NATO remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. At the Brussels Summit, the Alliance will make important decisions to further boost security in and around Europe, including through strengthened deterrence and defence, projecting stability and fighting terrorism, enhancing its partnership with the European Union, modernising the Alliance and achieving fairer burden-sharing. This Summit will be held in the new NATO Headquarters, a modern and sustainable home for a forward-looking Alliance. It will be the third meeting of Allied Heads of State and Government chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. + Summit meetings + Member countries + Partners + NATO Secretary General Archived material – Information valid up to 10 July 2018 1 NATO Summit Guide, Brussels 2018 I. Strengthening deterrence and defence NATO’s primary purpose is to protect its almost one billion citizens and to preserve peace and freedom. NATO must also be vigilant against a wide range of new threats, be they in the form of computer code, disinformation or foreign fighters. The Alliance has taken important steps to strengthen its collective defence and deterrence, so that it can respond to threats from any direction.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016
    NATO Summit Guide Warsaw, 8-9 July 2016 An essential Alliance in a more dangerous world The Warsaw Summit comes at a defining moment for the security of the North Atlantic Alliance. In recent years, the world has become more volatile and dangerous with Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and destabilisation of eastern Ukraine, as well as its military build-up from the Barents Sea to the Baltic, and from the Black Sea to the eastern Mediterranean; turmoil across the Middle East and North Africa, fuelling the biggest migrant and refugee crisis in Europe since World War Two; brutal attacks by ISIL and other terrorist groups, as well as cyber attacks, nuclear proliferation and ballistic missile threats. NATO is adapting to this changed security environment. It also remains committed to fulfilling its three core tasks: collective defence, crisis management and cooperative security. And, in the Polish capital, the Alliance will make important decisions to boost security in and around Europe, based on two key pillars: protecting its citizens through modern deterrence and defence, and projecting stability beyond its borders. NATO member states form a unique community of values, committed to the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. In today’s dangerous world, transatlantic cooperation is needed more than ever. NATO embodies that cooperation, bringing to bear the strength and unity of North America and Europe. This Summit is the first to be hosted in Poland and the first to be chaired by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, who took up his post in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Military Committee
    The International Military Staff (IMS) Six functional areas The IMS supports the Military Committee, with about The Military Committee oversees several of the IMS 400 dedicated military and civilian personnel working in operations and missions including the: an international capacity for the common interest of the Plans and Policy Alliance, rather than on behalf of their country of origin. ➤ International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan (ISAF). Responsible for strategic level plans Under the direction of the Director General, Lt.Gen. NATO is operating throughout Afghanistan with about 130,000 and policies, and defence/force Jürgen Bornemann, the staff prepare assessments, military personnel there under its command. ISAF has responsibility for, among other things, the provision of security, planning, including working with evaluations and reports on all issues that form the basis nations to determine national military Provincial Reconstruction Teams and training the Afghan of discussion and decisions in the MC. National Security Forces, known as the NATO Training Mission – NATO’s Military levels of ambition regarding force goals and contributions to NATO. Afghanistan (NTM-A). Supporting the transfer of responsibility The IMS is also responsible for planning, assessing for security to Afghan Authorities will remain a priority. Operations and recommending policy on military matters for ➤ Kosovo Force (KFOR). Since June 1999 NATO has led a Operation Active Endeavour is NATO’s Committee Closely tracks current operations, consideration by the Military Committee, and for peacekeeping operation in Kosovo. Initially composed of 50,000 maritime surveillance and escort operation staffs operational planning, follows ensuring their policies and decisions are implemented following the March 1999 air campaign, the force now numbers in the fight against terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 a Dissertation Presented
    The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Robert Thomas Davis II August 2008 © 2008 Robert Thomas Davis II All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 by ROBERT THOMAS DAVIS II has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by ______________________________ Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History ______________________________ Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii Abstract DAVIS, ROBERT THOMAS II, Ph.D., August 2008, History The Dilemma of NATO Strategy, 1949-1968 (422 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Peter John Brobst This study is a reappraisal of the strategic dilemma of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Cold War. This dilemma revolves around the problem of articulating a strategic concept for a military alliance in the nuclear era. NATO was born of a perceived need to defend Western Europe from a Soviet onslaught. It was an imperative of the early alliance to develop a military strategy and force posture to defend Western Europe should such a war break out. It was not long after the first iteration of strategy took shape than the imperative for a military defense of Europe receded under the looming threat of thermonuclear war. The advent of thermonuclear arsenals in both the United States and Soviet Union brought with it the potential destruction of civilization should war break out. This realization made statesmen on both sides of the Iron Curtain undergo what has been referred to as an ongoing process of nuclear learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato's Military Structure: Change And
    NEW WORLD ARCHITECTURE OF ECONOMY AND SECURITY 91 NATO’S MILITARY STRUCTURE: CHANGE AND CONTINUITY Ali Bilgin VARLIK Assistant Professor (Phd.), İstanbul Arel University, İİBF, IR, [email protected], ORCİD:0000-0002-5265-2321. Abstract NATO’s ability to accord and shape security environment can be consid- ered in four folds of which all are mutually integrated: Alliance’s solidarity, coherent common vision, consolidated security architecture and the capacity for rational prioritisation, and effective operational conduct. The security archi- tecture of the Alliance covers both core and peripheral organizations. The core organization conducts basic functions of the Alliance with the participation of the member states. Core or internal organization of the Alliance is composed of political, military and other complementary structures. The military struc- ture of NATO is of two components;command and the force structure. Com- mand structure comprises military headquarters responsible for the command and control of the military forces. Force structure of the Alliance is made up of forces allocated to NATO by member states. The Alliance has experienced four major transformative steps in command structure since its establishment. The initial force structure of the Alliance which covers all allocated forces to NATO has transformed to deployable force structure by three subsequent changes after the Cold War. The new structure is set based upon considerations on a gradual readiness level. This paper deals with the historical changes and continuity of NATO’s both command and force structures’ transformation and their justifica- tions -which have been rarely studies academically. Based up on this knowledge adequacy, effectiveness and rationality of both structures are scrutinised.The argument of the paper is that throughout NATO’s past the military structures has 92 YENİ DÜNYA EKONOMİ VE GÜVENLİK MİMARİSİ not only been a result of organizational change but also one of the main causes and determinants for the evolution and transformation of the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • CRPT-105Erpt14.Pdf
    105TH CONGRESS EXEC. RPT. 2d Session SENATE 105±14 "! PROTOCOLS TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY OF 1949 ON ACCESSION OF POLAND, HUNGARY, AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC MARCH 6, 1998.ÐOrdered to be printed Mr. HELMS, from the Committee on Foreign Relations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany Treaty Doc. 105±36] The Committee on Foreign Relations to which was referred the Protocols to the North Atlantic Treaty of 1949 on Accession of Po- land, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, which were opened for sig- nature at Brussels on December 16, 1997, and signed on behalf of the United States of America and other parties to the North Atlan- tic Treaty, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the Senate give its advice and consent to ratification thereof subject to seven declarations and four condi- tions as set forth in this report and the accompanying resolution of ratification. CONTENTS Page I. The Future of NATO and the Enlargement of the Alliance ....................... 2 II. Qualifications of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic for NATO Membership ................................................................................................ 8 III. The Cost of NATO Enlargement .................................................................. 17 IV. NATO-Russia Relations ................................................................................. 23 V. Senate Action ................................................................................................. 28 VI. Resolution of Ratification .............................................................................
    [Show full text]