DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport List Reinventing risk management for air travel Airport List Version: 1.1 14/10/2020 Data Classification: public DISCLAIMER Skytra Limited is a regulated benchmark administrator under the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Skytra Limited is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Airbus SE, and is a company incorporated in England and Wales under registered number 11984828. VAT number: 335130145 and LEI 254900Y389SLBTPDX711. The content on this website for information purposes only. None of the information concerning the services or products described constitutes advice or a recommendation of any product or service. To the extent that the information provided constitutes a financial promotion as defined by section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, it is only directed at persons who qualify as Professional clients as classified by MiFID II. © Copyright Skytra Limited. © Copyright Skytra Limited. Table of Contents Traffic Region ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Africa .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Asia / Pacific ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 CIS ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 44 1.4 Europe ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 1.5 Latin America ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 1.6 Middle East .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 81 1.7 North America ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 86 1.1 © Copyright Skytra Limited Data Classification: xxx 2 Traffic Region 1.1 Africa IATA TRAFFIC CITY COUNTRY TIMEZONE LATITUDE LONGITUDE CODE REGION JUB Juba South Sudan Africa Africa/Juba 4.872010231 31.601100920 LFW Lome Togo Africa Africa/Lome 6.165609837 1.254510045 PRI Praslin Seychelles Africa Indian/Mahe -4.319290161 55.691398620 SEZ Mahe Seychelles Africa Indian/Mahe -4.674340000 55.521801000 KMS Kumasi Ghana Africa Africa/Accra 6.714560032 -1.590819955 TKD Takoradi Ghana Africa Africa/Accra 4.896059990 -1.774760008 TML Tamale Ghana Africa Africa/Accra 9.557189941 -0.863214016 ACC Accra Ghana Africa Africa/Accra 5.605189800 -0.166786000 ABS Abu Simbel Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 22.375999450 31.611700060 LXR Luxor Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 25.671000000 32.706600000 HBE Alexandria Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 30.917699810 29.696399690 RMF Marsa Alam Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 25.557100300 34.583698270 CAI Cairo Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 30.121900560 31.405599590 HRG Hurghada Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 27.178300860 33.799400330 ASW Aswan Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 23.964399340 32.819999690 HMB Sohag Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 26.342778000 31.742778000 MUH Mersa Matruh Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 31.325399400 27.221700670 ATZ Asyut Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 27.046499250 31.011999130 SSH Sharm El-Sheikh Egypt Africa Africa/Cairo 27.977300640 34.395000460 DSS Thies Senegal Africa Africa/Dakar 14.670000000 -17.073333000 ZIG Ziguinchor Senegal Africa Africa/Dakar 12.555600000 -16.281799000 DKR Dakar Senegal Africa Africa/Dakar 14.739700320 -17.490200040 BNI Benin City Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 6.316979885 5.599500179 CBQ Calabar Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 4.976019859 8.347200394 ENU Enugu Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 6.474269867 7.561960220 KAD Kaduna Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 10.696000100 7.320109844 1.1 © Copyright Skytra Limited Data Classification: xxx 3 LOS Lagos Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 6.577370167 3.321160078 YOL Yola Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 9.257550240 12.430399890 ABV Abuja Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 9.006790161 7.263169765 ILR Ilorin Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 8.440210342 4.493919849 MIU Maiduguri Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 11.855299950 13.080900190 KAN Kano Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 12.047600000 8.524620000 SKO Sokoto Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 12.916299820 5.207190037 PHC Port Harcourt Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 5.015490055 6.949590206 JOS Jos Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 9.639829636 8.869050026 GMO Gombe Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 10.298333330 10.896388890 ABB Asaba Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 6.204167000 6.665278000 IBA Ibadan Nigeria Africa Africa/Lagos 7.362460136 3.978329897 DJE Djerba Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 33.875000000 10.775500300 TBJ Tabarka Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 36.979999540 8.876939774 SFA Sfax Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 34.717998500 10.690999980 TOE Tozeur Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 33.939701080 8.110560417 TUN Tunis Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 36.851001740 10.227199550 NBE Sousse Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 36.075833000 10.438611000 MIR Monastir Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 35.758098600 10.754699710 GAF Gafsa Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 34.422000890 8.822500229 GAE Gabes Tunisia Africa Africa/Tunis 33.876899720 10.103300090 ASM Asmara Eritrea Africa Africa/Asmara 15.291899680 38.910701750 BKO Bamako Mali Africa Africa/Bamako 12.533500000 -7.949940000 BGF Bangui Central African Republic Africa Africa/Bangui 4.398479939 18.518800740 BJL Banjul Gambia Africa Africa/Banjul 13.338000300 -16.652200700 OXB Bissau Guinea-Bissau Africa Africa/Bissau 11.894800190 -15.653699870 GOU Garoua Cameroon Africa Africa/Douala 9.335889816 13.370100020 DLA Douala Cameroon Africa Africa/Douala 4.006080151 9.719479561 NSI Yaounde Cameroon Africa Africa/Douala 3.722559929 11.553299900 NGE Ngaoundere Cameroon Africa Africa/Douala 7.357009888 13.559200290 MVR Maroua Cameroon Africa Africa/Douala 10.451399800 14.257399560 1.1 © Copyright Skytra Limited Data Classification: xxx 4 BUQ Bulawayo Zimbabwe Africa Africa/Harare -20.017401000 28.617901000 HRE Harare Zimbabwe Africa Africa/Harare -17.931801000 31.092800000 VFA Victoria Falls Zimbabwe Africa Africa/Harare -18.095899580 25.839000700 KAB Kariba Zimbabwe Africa Africa/Harare -16.519800190 28.885000230 KGL Kigali Rwanda Africa Africa/Kigali -1.968630000 30.139500000 KME Cyangugu Rwanda Africa Africa/Kigali -2.462239981 28.907899860 SZA Soio Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -6.141089916 12.371800420 VHC Saurimo Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -9.689069748 20.431900020 NOV Huambo Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -12.808899880 15.760499950 MSZ Namibe Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -15.261199950 12.146800040 CAB Cabinda Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -5.596990108 12.188400270 LAD Luanda Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -8.858370000 13.231200000 VPE Ondjiva Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -17.043500900 15.683799740 SPP Menongue Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -14.657600400 17.719800950 CBT Catumbela Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -12.479200000 13.486900000 SDD Lubango Angola Africa Africa/Luanda -14.924699780 13.574999810 NLA Ndola Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -12.998100280 28.664899830 CIP Chipata Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -13.558300020 32.587200160 KAA Kasama Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -10.216699600 31.133300780 RYL Lower Zambezi Nat. Park Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -15.717000000 29.300000000 LUN Lusaka Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -15.330800060 28.452600480 JEK Lower Zambezi Nat. Park Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -15.633000000 29.600000000 SLI Solwezi Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -12.167000000 26.367000000 MFU Mfuwe Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -13.258899690 31.936599730 KIW Kitwe Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -12.900500300 28.149900440 LVI Livingstone Zambia Africa Africa/Lusaka -17.821800230 25.822700500 SSG Malabo Equatorial Guinea Africa Africa/Malabo 3.755270004 8.708720207 VNX Vilankulos Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -22.018400190 35.313301090 UEL Quelimane Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -17.855499270 36.869098660 POL Pemba Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -12.991762160 40.524013520 INH Inhambane Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -23.876399990 35.408500670 1.1 © Copyright Skytra Limited Data Classification: xxx 5 MPM Maputo Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -25.920799000 32.572601000 APL Nampula Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -15.105600360 39.281799320 VXC Lichinga Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -13.274000000 35.266300000 TET Tete Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -16.104799270 33.640201570 MNC Nacala Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -14.488200190 40.712200160 VPY Chimoio Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -19.151300430 33.429000850 BEW Beira Mozambique Africa Africa/Maputo -19.796400070 34.907600400 MSU Maseru Lesotho
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice Among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 12, No. 9; 2016 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Pilkada 2015 and Patronage Practice among Bureaucrat in West Kalimantan, Indonesia Ngusmanto Ngusmanto1 1 Department of Public Administration, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia Correspondence: Ngusmanto Ngusmanto, Department of Public Administration, Tanjungpura University, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Jalan Prof. Dr. H. Hadari Nawawi, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, 78124, Indonesia. Tel: 62-812-5711-773. E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 28, 2016 Accepted: August 4, 2016 Online Published: August 26, 2016 doi:10.5539/ass.v12n9p236 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n9p236 Abstract Majority studies on electoral dynamics in Indonesia are reinforce patronage as a pattern of relationships between candidates, winning team, and voters. One of winning team element which have little attention from scholars is bureaucrat. Although, normatively, bureaucrats are required to neutral in all type of general election, but in fact bureaucrats is very involved deeply in general elections. Based on empirical research in Sintang District and Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia, we found that bureaucrats have a significant role as a winning team in pilkada (direct election for local leader). Patronage is a keyword to explain political relation between bureaucrats and candidate in pilkada. This situation was triggered by the fact that there are many candidates who have social background as civil servant and, consequently, have direct access to bureaucracy. Bureaucrats have high motivation to participate in pilkada as a broker due to protecting their vested interest. In our cases, the vested interest of bureaucrat is career stability which is promising additional personal revenue and social status.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report.PDF
    HAITONG SECURITIES CO., LTD. 海通證券股份有限公司 Annual Report 2016 2016 Annual Report 年度報告 CONTENTS Section I Definition and Important Risk Warnings 3 Section II Company Profile and Key Financial Indicators 7 Section III Summary of the Company’s Business 23 Section IV Report of the Board of Directors 28 Section V Significant Events 62 Section VI Changes in Ordinary Share and Particulars about Shareholders 91 Section VII Preferred Shares 100 Section VIII Particulars about Directors, Supervisors, Senior Management and Employees 101 Section IX Corporate Governance 149 Section X Corporate Bonds 184 Section XI Financial Report 193 Section XII Documents Available for Inspection 194 Section XIII Information Disclosure of Securities Company 195 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Board, the Supervisory Committee, Directors, Supervisors and senior management of the Company represent and warrant that this annual report (this “Report”) is true, accurate and complete and does not contain any false records, misleading statements or material omission and jointly and severally take full legal responsibility as to the contents herein. This Report was reviewed and passed at the twenty-third meeting of the sixth session of the Board. The number of Directors to attend the Board meeting should be 13 and the number of Directors having actually attended the Board meeting was 11. Director Li Guangrong, was unable to attend the Board meeting in person due to business travel, and had appointed Director Zhang Ming to vote on his behalf. Director Feng Lun was unable to attend the Board meeting in person due to business travel and had appointed Director Xiao Suining to vote on his behalf.
    [Show full text]
  • Rspo Notification of Proposed New Planting
    RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Report PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera-3 – West Kalimantan ` RSPO NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED NEW PLANTING This notification shall be on RSPO website for 30 days as required by the RSPO procedures for new plantings (http://www.rspo.otg/?q=page/535). It has also been posted on local on site notice boards. Date of notification: August 12, 2016 Tick whichever is appropriate √ This is a completely new development and stakeholders may submit comments This is part of an ongoing planting and is meant for notifications only Company: Bumitama Agri, Ltd Subsidiary: PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera – 3 RSPO Membership No : 1-0043-07-000-00 Location of Proposed New Planting: Kendawangan Subdistrict and Marau Subdisctrict, Ketapang District, West Kalimantan Province. GPS Reference : 2o9’46.11’’ – 2o23’0.87’’ LS - 110o25’1.47’’ – 110o38’1.67’’ BT RSPO New Planting Procedure Assessment Report PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejahtera 3 – West Kalimantan Location of the Proposed New Planting PT Karya Bakti Agro Sejehtara 3 (PT KBAS-3) a subsidiary Bumitama Agri, Ltd, is developing area approximately was 6,680 Ha based on Location Permit Number 567/PEM/2015 accordance to Head of District of Ketapang for palm oil plantation development, located at Kendawangan Subdistrict and Marau Subdistrict, Ketapang District – West Kalimantan Province. The shareholders of PT KBAS - 3 are BAL Group was 99.6% under PT Agro Manunggal Sawitindo (member of BAL) and Bumitama Gunajaya Agro was 0.4%. General company location information: Description Information
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Fuels 34 Gas/Hybrid Engines 38
    PETROMIN MA RINE Singapore www.petrominonline.com 2020 MAR – aPR & OFFSH ORE AlTERNATIVE FUEls foR GREEN SHIPPIng ToUGH OUTlooK FOR REGIONAL POWERHOUSE P12 EUROPE DomINATES LNG IMPORT STORY IN 2019 P30 Mar – A PR 2020 VOL. 2 NO.02 VOL. Singapore • China • India • Myanmar • Thailand • Japan • Vietnam • Malaysia • Korea • Australia • Germany Your custom solution provider Range of products include: • Accommodation Systems • Electrical Systems • Deck Machinery • Propulsion Systems • Ballast Water Management Systems • Pumps • Cranes • Compressors • LNG/Scrubber Systems • Loading Computer • System Rudder We are able to source the right products with the right specifications with the right quality, at the right cost. Red Offshore Industries Pte Ltd Email: [email protected] Website: www.red-offshore.com CONTENTS The global pandemic has led With IMO resolute on reducing REGULAR to a supply glut and massive the shipping industry’s footprint FOCUS drop in oil prices. The following on the environment, decarbon- article highlights the major ization is one of the main focus ar- 03 Editorial consequences. eas. This article provides some of the options available to shipown- 04 Updates 30 Market News ers to aid them in their journey IMCA ramps up its presence Europe Dominates LNG Import towards zero-carbon. Story in 2019 06 Industry News 38 WinGD Advances Clean 44 Calendar of Events Fuel Research with Flexible 12 Regional Feature Injector Concept Tough Outlook For Regional As the marine and offshore Powerhouse industry move towards greener IN DEPTH operations there is a need 18 Project News for engines which can be 34 Pathways to operated with greener fuel. 26 Novel Coronavirus Decarbonization - This article provides an update Wreaks Havoc on the Oil Simplifying New Fuel on technology which assists & Gas Industry Choices for Shipowners this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Riots – Communal Violence
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IDN30556 Country: Indonesia Date: 15 September 2006 Keywords: IDN30556 – Indonesia – Tangerang – Riots – Communal violence This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Please advise the location of Pontianak and Tangerang. 2. Please advise if there is any reference to riots, looting, etc. in Tangerang in June 1999, December 2003 and November 2004. 3. Are there further references to looting or rioting in Tangerang on other occasions since 1995? 4. Please provide information about ethnic and/or racial tensions in this area, and also in Indonesia generally. RESPONSE 1. Please advise me of the location of Pontianak and Tangerang. Pontianak is located in the province of West Kalimantan and is the provincial capital (‘Maps and Geographic information – Indonesia’ January 2004, United Nations website http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/indonesi.pdf#search=%22map%20of%20 indonesia%22 – Accessed 12 September – Attachment 1). Tangerang is a large city located about 20km west of the national capital Jakarta. It is in the province of Banten in West Java1 (‘Tangerang’ (undated), Wikipedia website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tangerang – Accessed 12 September 2006 – Attachment 2). 1 Users should be aware that Wikipedia is a Web-based free-content encylopaedia which is written collaboratively by volunteers. The Research Service recommends that users of Wikipedia familiarise themselves with the regulatory practices which Wikipedia employs as a preventative measure against vandalism, bias and inaccuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Forest Reduction in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X (printed edition) Volume 11, Number 1, January 2010 ISSN: 2085-4722 (electronic) Pages: 46-54 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d110110 Characterizing forest reduction in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan, Indonesia ASEP SUNJAYA ADHIKERANA1, JITO SUGARDJITO2,♥ 1Fauna and Flora International – Indonesia Programme, Jl. Harsono, R.M. No.1, Ragunan, Jakarta 12550, Indonesia 2Research Centre for Biology, The Indonesia Institute for Sciences, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong-Bogor 16911, West Java, Indonesia, Tel.: +62-21-8765056 Fax.: +62-21-8765068, ♥e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 16 November 2009. Revision accepted: 29 December 2009. ABSTRACT Adhikerana AS, Sugardjito J (2010) Characterizing forest reduction in Ketapang district, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 11: 46-54. We have characterized deforestation in the Ketapang district forests when we implemented the Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) Conservation in Trans-boundary Landscape between Central and West Kalimantan provinces. For the purpose of evaluating the changes in land use and land cover in the study areas, a series of Landsat imageries have been analyzed. Each of the Landsat imagery data set for all study areas was initially classified using unsupervised classification into 13 different land-cover types. Ground truth checks were undertaken for Ketapang district forests and Sungai Puteri peat swamp forest, from which the results were used for the supervised land use classification of these two study areas. Between 1992 and 2000 there was only small conversion of primary forest into secondary forests. During this period barren land remained extensive about 30.17% of the total area of Ketapang district. Both agriculture and plantation areas substantially increased 56% and 55% respectively during 2003, while at the same time the extent of both primary and peat swamp forests were considerably reduced up to 15% and 28% respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Heilongjiang Road Development II Project (Yichun-Nenjiang)
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: TA 7117 – PRC October 2009 People’s Republic of China: Heilongjiang Road Development II Project (Yichun-Nenjiang) FINAL REPORT (Volume II of IV) Submitted by: H & J, INC. Beijing International Center, Tower 3, Suite 1707, Beijing 100026 US Headquarters: 6265 Sheridan Drive, Suite 212, Buffalo, NY 14221 In association with WINLOT No 11 An Wai Avenue, Huafu Garden B-503, Beijing 100011 This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. All views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Asian Development Bank Heilongjiang Road Development II (TA 7117 – PRC) Final Report Supplementary Appendix A Financial Analysis and Projections_SF1 S App A - 1 Heilongjiang Road Development II (TA 7117 – PRC) Final Report SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX SF1 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND PROJECTIONS A. Introduction 1. Financial projections and analysis have been prepared in accordance with the 2005 edition of the Guidelines for the Financial Governance and Management of Investment Projects Financed by the Asian Development Bank. The Guidelines cover both revenue earning and non revenue earning projects. Project roads include expressways, Class I and Class II roads. All will be built by the Heilongjiang Provincial Communications Department (HPCD). When the project started it was assumed that all project roads would be revenue earning. It was then discovered that national guidance was that Class 2 roads should be toll free. The ADB agreed that the DFR should concentrate on the revenue earning Expressway and Class I roads, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Community Under the Soekarno Era in Indonesia
    Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 31(1), 2021 Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 31(1), 2021, pp. 104-110 P-ISSN: 0854-0039, E-ISSN: 2407-5825 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v31i1.23986 Chinese Community under the Soekarno Era in Indonesia Septian Aji Permana1, Ari Retno Purwatiningsih2 1 Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta, [email protected] 2 Universitas Terbuka Article history Abstract: is study aims to analyze the life of Chinese people in Indonesia during the Soe- Received : 2020-04-10 karno government and analyze the government’s treatment of Chinese people in the Soekar- Accepted : 2021-03-20 no era. is study used a historical method approach with a limited history across the 1930s Published : 2021-03-31 period, from 1941 to 1958, from 1959 to 1966. e method used is as follows: data collection in the form of literature studies relevant to the subject matter discussed, source criticism to Keywords find out the relevant elements through the incorporation of information obtained through Chinese community the source, and compilation i.e., writing historical facts. Political and economic perceptions Soekarno Era influenced Chinese ethnic communities in Indonesia during colonial, the old order, and the Culture new times. Chinese society received many sanctions from the Soekarno government because Policy of communist ideology, which was a threat to the government. e existence of ethnocentric during the old order so that Chinese people cannot be received well. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kehidupan masyarakat Tionghoa di Indonesia pada masa pemerintahan Soekarno dan menganalisis perlakuan pemerintah ter- hadap orang Tionghoa pada masa pemerintahan Soekarno.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Potential Economic in Undeveloped Regency Through Maritime Infrastructure
    UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IN UNDEVELOPED REGENCY THROUGH MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE (CASE STUDY: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OF NORTH KAYONG REGENCY) Imanuddin ABDULGANI, [email protected], Gadjah Mada University ABSTRACT The North Kayong Regency is one of the new Regency in West Kalimantan Province that is still lack of infrastructure development such as infrastructure and public amenities. The purpose of this research is to contribute in regional development planning policy through determine appropriate method in maritime infrastructure for increasing regional economic growth. Our study shows that the best practice to improve the development planning process is improve better and appropriate policies that might be apply through the new methods on practice oriented, focus on strategies, tools and manage the utilization of planning and resources. By maintain strategies, develop solution that integrates different dimension of regional planning and resources in every conceivable way to solve the problem and to overcome the obstacles. Keyword : Economic Growth, Maritime Infrastructure, Interconnectivity, Regional Development Planning, Undeveloped Regency INTRODUCTION The Maritime Infrastructure and its benefit for Development can not be implemented optimally, since there is regulation that the use of maritime infrastructure must follow the order of the Ministry of Transportation and Provincial Agency for Transportation which supplemented by the Provincial Spatial Plan (RTRW). The challenge is that the maritime infrastructure is not always coincident with the administrative area so as to allow synergies between agencies can not run harmoniously and produce no real technical action. For example, making a grand design of a regional sea port development can have a different direction of environmental function with a land allocation which is arranged in the Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW).
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Imposed Threats to Sun Bears in Borneo Methods
    HUMAN-IMPOSEDTHREATS TO SUN BEARS IN BORNEO ERIKMEIJAARD, Ecosense Consultants,c/o Inchdryne,Nethybridge, Inverness-shire, Scotland PH253EF Abstract:The sun bear(Helarctos malayanus) is the least studiedbear species, andlittle informationexists on threatsto its survival.Based on studiesof otherbear species, I hypothesizedthat sun bearson the island of Borneo are threatenedby destructionof habitatand hunting. The resultsof this 3-year surveyconfirmed this hypothesis.More specificallyit identified4 factorsthat influence sun bear survival in Borneo:hunting, trade in live bearsand bear parts,habitat destruction, and establishment of plantations.Survey data and background information suggest that hunting pressure on Borean sun bears is high. Tradein bearparts is now uncommonin Kalimantan,but it was higherin the 1980s. In Sabahand Sarawak,however, trade in beargall bladders is still common.My estimatesindicate that the sun bearlost 30-60 %of its totalhabitat in Borneobetween 1960 and 1990, mainlythrough logging and landconversion. Apart from the possible deleteriouseffects of logging andconversion on the carryingcapacity of the habitat,these activitiesare accom- panied by increasinghuman presence and huntingpressure. There is a lack of ecological data on sun bears, so the impactof these factorscannot be assessed.However, this studyprovides a clearerfocus for sun bearconservation, including recommendations on researchand policy matters. Ursus 11:185-192 Key words: Borneo, conservation,gall bladders,Helarctos malayanus, hunting, Malayan sun bear,threats The sun bear,which occurs in forests of lowland tropi- involving 208 field days in Kalimantan.In addition I cal southeast Asia, is the least studied of all ursids spent 69 days in towns and villages for official visits and (Servheen 1989, MeijaardIn Press). Very little ecologi- interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Spratly Islands
    R i 120 110 u T4-Y5 o Ganzhou Fuqing n h Chenzhou g Haitan S T2- J o Dao Daojiang g T3 S i a n Putian a i a n X g i Chi-lung- Chuxiong g n J 21 T6 D Kunming a i Xingyi Chang’an o Licheng Xiuyu Sha Lung shih O J a T n Guilin T O N pa Longyan T7 Keelung n Qinglanshan H Na N Lecheng T8 T1 - S A an A p Quanzhou 22 T'ao-yüan Taipei M an T22 I L Ji S H Zhongshu a * h South China Sea ng Hechi Lo-tung Yonaguni- I MIYAKO-RETTO S K Hsin-chu- m c Yuxi Shaoguan i jima S A T21 a I n shih Suao l ) Zhangzhou Xiamen c e T20 n r g e Liuzhou Babu s a n U T Taichung e a Quemoy p i Meizhou n i Y o J YAEYAMA-RETTO a h J t n J i Taiwan C L Yingcheng K China a a Sui'an ( o i 23 n g u H U h g n g Fuxing T'ai- a s e i n Strait Claimed Straight Baselines Kaiyuan H ia Hua-lien Y - Claims in the Paracel and Spratly Islands Bose J Mai-Liao chung-shih i Q J R i Maritime Lines u i g T9 Y h e n e o s ia o Dongshan CHINA u g B D s Tropic of Cancer J Hon n Qingyuan Tropic of Cancer Established maritime boundary ian J Chaozhou Makung n Declaration of the People’s Republic of China on the Baseline of the Territorial Sea, May 15, 1996 g i Pingnan Heyuan PESCADORES Taiwan a Xicheng an Wuzhou 21 25° 25.8' 00" N 119° 56.3' 00" E 31 21° 27.7' 00" N 112° 21.5' 00" E 41 18° 14.6' 00" N 109° 07.6' 00" E While Bandar Seri Begawan has not articulated claims to reefs in the South g Jieyang Chaozhou 24 T19 N BRUNEI Claim line Kaihua T10- Hsi-yü-p’ing Chia-i 22 24° 58.6' 00" N 119° 28.7' 00" E 32 19° 58.5' 00" N 111° 16.4' 00" E 42 18° 19.3' 00" N 108° 57.1' 00" E China Sea (SCS), since 1985 the Sultanate has claimed a continental shelf Xinjing Guiping Xu Shantou T11 Yü Luxu n Jiang T12 23 24° 09.7' 00" N 118° 14.2' 00" E 33 19° 53.0' 00" N 111° 12.8' 00" E 43 18° 30.2' 00" N 108° 41.3' 00" E X Puning T13 that extends beyond these features to a hypothetical median with Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Rpr-2009-7-5
    ERIA Research Project Report 2009, No. 7-5 DDEVELOPMENT OF CCHINA’’S TTRANSPORTATION IINFRASTRUCTURE AND IINTERNATIONAL CCONNECTIVITY EDITED BY 1 ZHANG YUNLING March 2010 1 Zhang Yunling as the research director of this project, is responsible for designing and writing the final report paper, while Wu Wehua, Zhao Minglong, Zhang Yushan and Zhong Feiteng as the research team members, are responsible for preliminary research and drafting the designated part. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Project Members ii CHAPTER 1. Overview: the Development of China’s Transportation Infrastructure 1 CHAPTER 2. The Development of Transportation Infrastructure and International 18 Links in China’s Southeast Region CHAPTER 3. The Development of Transportation Infrastructure and International 37 Links in China’s Northeast Region CHAPTER 4. The Development of Transportation Infrastructure and International 53 Links in China’s Northwest Region CHAPTER 5. The Development of Transport Infrastructure and International Links in 69 China’s Southwest Region CHAPTER 6. Infrastructure Development in East Asia and Cooperation between China 81 and Japan i LIST OF PROJECT MEMBERS Project Director: Zhang Yunling, Professor, Director of Academic Division of International Studies, Academy Member, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Research team members: Wu Wenhua, Professor, Director of the Institute of Transportation, Institute of Macroeconomics of Nation Development and Reform Commission (Chapter 1) Zhao Minglong, Professor, Director of the Institute of
    [Show full text]