The $64,000 Question (1955 – 1968) Host: Hal March

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The $64,000 Question (1955 – 1968) Host: Hal March COM308 Week 4 Notes—Quiz Show Scandal Purpose Today we are going to consider the formative years of TV and the quiz show scandal's impact on the TV business and a naive America. Background When CBS premiered "The $64,000 Question" in 1955, the show was more than a hit; it was a national phenomenon. No program in the short history of television had ever attracted so many viewers so quickly -- 47 million in ten weeks. Audiences loved the idea of watching people like themselves compete for huge sums of money by answering tough questions. "The common man as genius," one writer called it. More quiz shows followed, including "Twenty One" and "Tic Tac Dough." At the times these shows aired, the crime rate and movie theatre attendance actually dropped. What the viewing audience was to learn, but only much later, was that many of the TV quiz shows were fixed. Initially, popular contestants were favored with easier questions; they were "rehearsed" by the show's producers for hours before airtime. When producer Dan Enright saw ratings plummet for his show "Twenty One," he went even further, providing contestants with answers before air time. To make the charade convincing, Enright coached his hand-picked winners down to the smallest detail: when to stutter, mop their brow, bite their lip, even how to dress. The most famous of these contestants was Charles Van Doren. Young, intelligent, and handsome, Van Doren was "a bona fide egghead with enough sex appeal" to create a sensation. Slowly and painfully, the deceit unraveled. When a Congressional investigation revealed that wholesome Van Doren and the quiz shows were a fraud, Americans felt angry and betrayed. The $64,000 Question (1955 – 1968) Host: Hal March In this show, contestants entered an isolation booth and “struggled” to answer the most arcane questions in their personally chosen category. Unbeknownst to the viewers and (some of the players) the producers had already provided answers to the more charismatic contestants. If a contestant was likeable, the viewer was more apt to tune in next week to follow their progress. Interestingly, one contestant preselected by the producers to fail actually succeeded in going all the way to the big prize. Her name – Dr. Joyce Brothers. The subject – prize fighting. Needing the money, she studied for three months before the show and was unstoppable. If TV game show Twenty-One was fixed, then the $64,000 Question was “controlled.” If they liked a contestant and thought he/she was good for ratings, then they picked questions which played to the strength of the contestant’s expertise. And if they didn’t like you, they fielded you a hard ball. 1 Such is the case with Dr. Joyce Brothers, the only person to win both the $64,000 Question and the $64,000 Challenge. But that was far from the plan. The producers wanted to dump her early because they didn’t think she had star power. Partly influenced by Martin and Charles Revson, of Revlon, the show’s sponsors, producers attempted to stump Dr. Brothers. They loved contradictions. The mechanic who knew opera. In her case, the psychologist who knew boxing. Once she got to a certain level and they wanted rid of her, they threw her a question about referees, which they thought to be beyond her grasp. But the enterprising Dr. Brothers had been studying in between weekly shows, and surprised them all by answering correctly. What could they do but let her run on? Later she was on the sister show for winners, the $64,000 Challenge where she was challenged by a team of boxers and again she won the big prize. Twenty-One (1956-1958) Host: Jack Berry At the time he created the quiz show "Twenty-One," Dan Enright was one of the most successful game show producers in television. Beginning in radio, Enright had worked with Jack Barry to create and produce a series of successful quiz shows. Enright’s connection to Barry went back to the late 1940s, when they worked as partners creating and packaging programs for radio and television. One of their earliest television successes was "Juvenile Jury," which included a panel of young people who answered questions submitted by home viewers, studio audience members and celebrity guests. That success was followed by a similar show with older guests called "Life Begins at 80." With "Wisdom of the Ages," the partners combined the best of both shows, mixing a panel of youngsters and the elderly. "Tic Tac Dough" was based on the game of tic-tac- toe and broadcast weekdays on NBC. Later on, a prime-time and higher-stakes version aired. After Life Begins at Eighty was dropped and Can Do, a celebrity stunt show with host Robert Alda, failed, the producers searched for a new project. Twenty One, a television quiz show based on the blackjack, was the next game these independent producers would launch. "The show went on the air in 1956 and we felt that it had such great quality and content to it that we would not have to rig it," Enright recalls. "In fact, the first show of "Twenty-One" was not rigged and the first show of "Twenty-One" was a dismal failure. It was just plain dull." The next morning, the show’s sponsor, Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which produced Geritol, called Enright and Barry, telling them "in no uncertain terms that he never wanted to see a repeat of what happened the previous night," remembers Enright. "And from that moment on, we decided to rig 'Twenty-One.'" Rigging or no rigging, the show’s ratings were not impressive during the early weeks of its run. Viewers complained that its mid-week 10:30 P.M. time slot was too late. One pundit suggested that the show needed a good dose of the Geritol and Serutan sold by the show’s sponsors. Then 2 Enright seemed to make a move certain to doom the show: He placed it against NBC’s hit show "I Love Lucy." Enright and Barry believed they could attract more viewers if they could find guests that the audience would want to root for or against – and then choreograph these guests' involvement. The plan became reality with the appearance of an affable, 30-year old English professor from Columbia University named Charles Van Doren. Van Doren’s reign on the show would stretch for 14 weeks and his appeal would turn the show into one of the most-watched television game shows of the 1950s. "Twenty-One" became such a success that NBC bought it from Enright and Barry for $2.2 million. Discussion Questions: 1. How does reality relate to non-fiction TV? What are the goals of non-fiction programs such as talk shows, newscasts, magazine shows, game shows, documentaries, and so- called "real drama" or reality programming like "Cops"? Are such programs "show business"? What responsibilities do non-fiction television producers have to their audiences–must they be truthful? When, if ever, might they not? Is it ever ethical to present shades of truth? If yes, present some examples. Do you believe the non-fiction programs they see today? How would they feel if they learned certain scenarios were "rigged"? 2. "It couldn’t have happened in any other medium," said Joseph Cates, producer of The $64,000 Question, regarding the quiz show scandal. Why might seeing contestants in a quiz show influence the audience’s feelings about them? How do such signifiers as clothing, mannerisms, styles, age, and weight affect an audience’s perceptions? How might these perceptions influence drama, tension, and, ultimately, ratings? 3. After the scandal, Charles Van Doren noted that he now believed the difference between good and evil was "not cut and dried." What were the motives of the producers? Sponsor Charles Revson? Contestant Herb Stempel? Charles van Doren? What power did each have? What power did each believe he had? Do you think these people were good, bad, or both? 3 .
Recommended publications
  • The Reporter, November 7, 1956
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works The Reporter Archives 1956 The Reporter, November 7, 1956 How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/bb_arch_reporter/312 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE . ���ili ( .. r,.•3) � r\ "Have WondeTful : (S .. P,g•5) • I<. Ep QR1!!1��t� COCCICf'JtU•� Only Volume LI . 1 ·o. 8 By Subscription Former City Mid-East Conflict Affects Students E.�. student t Council' Pres. the male gathering, felt more than shor survey by this paper f?und WI ns $44,000 By James Cox t r t t t a little relieved. For to them, �n- tha mo e studen s a he Busmess The overflowing crowds in the t . t r t o her Korean-tyre ?ol!ce ac 10n Center are reading mo e news- elevision lounge and Lounge C t . t r r n OW l Wins M al t t would mean_ rad g m their tex - pape s to bone, up on the wa Q TV sh ed watching and lis ening o President m t t t t r t t agains Isa:real, Eisenhower speak to he na ion books f�r ifles; to some for he Egyp is figh ing Herb Stempel who was once ewbold Morris, former pres­ t t France, and England. r t t Wednesday e,,ening pointed up he second ime.
    [Show full text]
  • Blurring Fiction with Reality: American Television and Consumerism in the 1950S
    Blurring fiction with reality: American television and consumerism in the 1950s On the evening of 15 October 1958, veteran correspondent Edward R. Murrow stood at the podium and looked out over the attendees of the annual Radio Television Digital News Association gala. He waited until complete silence descended, and then launched into a speech that he had written and typed himself, to be sure that no one could possibly have had any forewarning about its contents. What followed was a scathing attack on the state of the radio and television industries, all the more meaningful coming from a man who was widely acknowledged as not only the architect of broadcast journalism but also a staunch champion of ethics and integrity in broadcasting.1 This was the correspondent who had stood on the rooftops of London with bombs exploding in the background to bring Americans news of the Blitz, whose voice was familiar to millions of Americans. This was the man who had publicly eviscerated the redbaiting Senator Joseph McCarthy, helping to put an end to a shameful period in America’s history (see e.g. Mirkinson, 2014, Sperber, 1986). And it became apparent that evening that this was also a man bitterly disappointed with the “incompatible combination of show business, advertising and news” that the broadcasting industry had become: Our history will be what we make it. And if there are any historians about fifty or a hundred years from now, and there should be preserved the kinescopes for one week of all three networks, they will there find recorded in black and white, or color, evidence of decadence, escapism and insulation from the realities of the world in which we live.
    [Show full text]
  • CBS, Rural Sitcoms, and the Image of the South, 1957-1971 Sara K
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Rube tube : CBS, rural sitcoms, and the image of the south, 1957-1971 Sara K. Eskridge Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Eskridge, Sara K., "Rube tube : CBS, rural sitcoms, and the image of the south, 1957-1971" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3154. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3154 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. RUBE TUBE: CBS, RURAL SITCOMS, AND THE IMAGE OF THE SOUTH, 1957-1971 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Sara K. Eskridge B.A., Mary Washington College, 2003 M.A., Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006 May 2013 Acknowledgements Many thanks to all of those who helped me envision, research, and complete this project. First of all, a thank you to the Middleton Library at Louisiana State University, where I found most of the secondary source materials for this dissertation, as well as some of the primary sources. I especially thank Joseph Nicholson, the LSU history subject librarian, who helped me with a number of specific inquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class
    North East Journal of Legal Studies Volume 35 Spring/Fall 2016 Article 5 3-20-2017 Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class Sharlene A. McEvoy Fairfield Universty, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb Recommended Citation McEvoy, Sharlene A. (2017) "Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class," North East Journal of Legal Studies: Vol. 35 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb/vol35/iss1/5 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 91 / Vol 35 / North East Journal of Legal Studies Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class by Dr. Sharlene A. McEvoy ABSTRACT It was a big deal in the late 1950s but many students have difficulty understanding what the fuss was all about when it was revealed that television quiz shows were rigged.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of St. Thomas Odyssey Program
    index file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/sangstj/Desktop/web%20pages... The University of St. Thomas Odyssey Program Fall 2008 I. Course Description and Objectives: Welcome to the Odyssey Program! “Odyssey” is a one-credit, first-semester class, consisting of one-hour, small-group discussions of an important text every Friday afternoon during the fall semester. The Odyssey Program is intended to help students achieve the following objectives: Our hope is that first‑semester freshmen will: · become acquainted with university life; · become acquainted with Catholic higher education, and UST in particular; · begin to develop the skills that will facilitate their success at UST; · develop an understanding of and appreciation for the university core curriculum; · develop an appreciation of the different "ways of knowing" characteristic of each of the major disciplines and the methodology unique to a particular core discipline or area; · acquire strategies to improve reading, writing, and research competencies; · develop an understanding of the interrelationship across disciplines of the core curriculum; and · develop an understanding of and appreciation for the relevance of the core curriculum in preparing students for effective living. II. What Will Be Expected of Students Each Week: 1. 25-35 pages of reading per week. 2. Completion of an on-line weekly reading quiz via Blackboard prior to class. 3. Attendance at weekly discussion sections. 4. Arrive at class with 3 possible questions for discussion. 5. A five-minute reflection paper at the end of each class. III. List of Readings: 1. Josef Pieper, Leisure the Basis of Culture, tr. Gerard Malsbary (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Zelig You Can't Come Home Again Lydia Rolita "96 Hadn 'Tread the Book
    October 4, 1994 3 2 .::O.:.:cto:=;b:.;:e.:...r4~,..:.19:..:9_4____________ The.Gadfly ----------------- CaIDpus News ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Quiz Show's Van Doren abroad and the salary to satisfy his fine tastes. Charles was easily became a recluse. There were job attracted to the phenomenon of quiz shows. offers from a myriad of schools, Charles Van Doren first appeared on the quiz show "Twenty­ including his alma mater, St. John's. a real-life alum One" on November 28, 1956, and remained deadlocked with the He turned them all down and con­ D.C. Minutes current champion, Herbert Stempel, until December 5th. Over centrated on his family. Eventually, the next fourteen weeks Van Doren remained undefeated and he took up writing again and be­ Sam Huzley "95 Gabriel Bell, '98 became the most loved and lauded quiz show cqntestant ev~r. came involved with the Encyclope­ In the mid 1950's, quiz shows occupied an important role in On the surface, Van Doren was all that America could ~ant .m dia Britannica organization. Cur­ D.C. Minutes for 9/22/94 and 9/ 27/94 $750.00fortheSwirnClubandweaquaiesced what is now known as the Golden Age of Television. They w~re, an intellectual champion. He was young, white, well bred, rently he is writing fiction and is (abridged) (God, I really kill me) "Mr. Anderson, are you now or have you on the surface, a celebration of human intellect broadcast straight energetic (his sweaty contemplation over various q~estions affiliated with the Aspen Institute. 9fl7/94 ever been male?"-Jolm Dean at the Watergate into the living rooms of America.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Television Fraud the History and Implications of The
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Television Fraud The History and Implications of the Quiz Show Scandals by Kent Anderson Television Fraud: The History and Implications of the Quiz Show Scandals by Kent Anderson. Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this reCAPTCHA to demonstrate that it's you making the requests and not a robot. If you are having trouble seeing or completing this challenge, this page may help. If you continue to experience issues, you can contact JSTOR support. Block Reference: #0dfa9e20-ce3c-11eb-b781-7deb85178a3d VID: #(null) IP: 116.202.236.252 Date and time: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:44:49 GMT. 1950s quiz show scandals. The American quiz show scandals of the 1950s were a series of revelations that contestants of several popular television quiz shows were secretly given assistance by the show's producers to arrange the outcome of an ostensibly fair competition. The quiz show scandals were driven by a variety of reasons. Some of those reasons included the drive for financial gain, the willingness of contestants to "play along" with the assistance, and the lack of current regulations prohibiting the rigging of game shows. [1] The $64,000 Question became the first big-money television quiz show during the 1950s, and the most publicized quiz scandals surrounded that program in addition to Twenty One and Dotto . [1] In 1956, the Jack Barry-hosted game show Twenty One featured a contestant, Herb Stempel, coached by producer Dan Enright to allow his opponent to win the game. The matter was brought into focus in 1958 when Enright was revealed to have rigged the show; this revelation caused networks to cancel their entire lineups of quiz shows.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOTNOTE to a FRAUD Probe Into Perjury, Subornation of Per- Jury and Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
    life may be extended to permit further FOOTNOTE TO A FRAUD probe into perjury, subornation of per- jury and conspiracy to obstruct justice. Perjury arrests begin in tv quiz investigation An unconfirmed report was that names A sad little band of one time televi- on. Other complaints followed. In the of prominent lawyers had been men- sion quiz winners surrendered last week fall of that year Mr. Hogan began pre- tioned in the grand jury's investigation on indictments charging them with per- senting witnesses to a grand jury. In of subornation of perjury (urging a jury. all some 200 witnesses testified. witness to testify falsely). A year or two ago several of them In August 1959, the grand jury min- The Defendants The list of contest- were national celebrities. Last week they utes, then under lock and key by order ants who surrendered last week: were accused of misdemeanors carrying of a judge, were turned over by petition Charles Van Doren, 34, former maximum penalties, upon conviction, of to the House Legislative Oversight Sub- NBC -TV personality, winner of $129,- a year's imprisonment and $500 fine. committee, which climaxed its case 000 on Twenty-One and later a $50,- At the head of the defendants was when Mr. Doren confessed that his 14 000 -a -year NBC performer (fired after Charles Van Doren, whose confession appearances on NBC -TV's Twenty -One his confession); Elfrida Von Nardoff, a year ago killed the big -money quiz as were rigged. The Harris subcommittee 35, winner of $220,500 on Twenty- a television staple.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH EAST JOURNAL of LEGAL STUDIES Volume Thirty Five Spring/Fall 2016
    NORTH EAST JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Volume Thirty Five Spring/Fall 2016 NORTH EAST JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Sharlene A. McEvoy Fairfield University SENIOR ARTICLES EDITORS J.L. Yranski Nasuti Richard J. Kraus Martin H. Zern Iona College Pace University Pace University An official publication of the North East Academy of Legal Studies in Business, Inc. © 2016 ISSN: 1545-0597 INFORMATION FOR CONTRIBUTORS The North East Journal of Legal Studies is a double blind refereed journal, published once a year. Its purpose is to encourage scholarly research in legal studies and pedagogy related thereto. Articles may be submitted simultaneously to this journal and others with the understanding that the author(s) will notify this journal if the article is to be published elsewhere. We will not publish an article that will be published in another journal. Papers should relate to the field of Business Law (including recognized topics within Business Law and the Legal Environment of Business) or to Legal Studies Education. The Journal will consider submission of articles from those papers presented at the North East Academy of Legal Studies in Business Annual Conference. The paper designated the recipient of the Hoehlein Award for Distinguished Paper at the NEALSB Conference will serve as the lead article of the journal. Up to four articles from resources other than those presented at the NEALSB Conference may be published in the journal. Articles offered for inclusion in the next issue of the journal shall be submitted to the editor by September 1. PROCEDURE FOR SUBMITTING PAPERS Articles submitted for publication should be three clean, camera ready originals (no photocopies) accompanied by a diskette version of Microsoft Word for Windows prepared as set forth below and sent to: Professor Sharlene A.
    [Show full text]
  • In an Enemy of the People, As We Watch Brothers Battle Over the Fate
    TunedBy Kellie Mecleary, Production Dramaturg, and Matthew Buckley Smith In In An Enemy of the People, as we watch brothers battle over the fate of their town, it is worth noting the role that the town paper, The People’s Daily Messenger, plays—the various ways in which it contributes to the machinations and outcome of the plot. The paper is a powerful tool, and its use in the play reflects the use of mass media in other times. In Arthur Miller’s day, the media that was fast becoming a central part of American life was television: as it grew in scope and influence, it took on the role of both informing and reflecting American society and culture. These pages provide an overview of the late ’50s and early ’60s through the major shows and events that dominated the small screen at the time. I Love Lucy used his celebrity to run for president in technology wholeheartedly. The television For the dazzling, six-year run of the show, 1952, gaining almost 40 times as many program Disneyland skillfully promoted an I Love Lucy would remain conservative votes in Democratic primary elections as eponymous amusement park that opened in content and innovative in technique. Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson. Party several months later to such popularity Lucy, the scheming, ebullient housewife leadership, however, favored Stevenson, that in only two-and-a-half years it marked of Cuban bandleader Ricky Ricardo, never who went on to lose to General Dwight its 10-millionth visitor. With a hit theme earns her own money but never stops D.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Hearings Into Cultural Regulation
    Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulation, 1953-1967 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Shawn M. Selby August 2008 © 2008 Shawn M. Selby. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulatoin, 1953-1967 by SHAWN M. SELBY has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin M. Mattson Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 2 ABSTRACT SELBY, SHAWN M., Ph.D., August 2008, History Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulation, 1953-1967 (439 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Kevin M. Mattson This dissertation describes the series investigations and hearings into cultural regulation that took place before the U.S. congress between 1953 and 1967. Beginning with Senate inquiries into juvenile delinquency and ending with the creation of the public broadcasting system in 1967, the dissertation argues that lawmakers and witnesses repeatedly emphasized internal industry oversight and the power of competition within the culture industry to regulate cultural products like comic books, movies and television. Public television was seen as a solution to the problem that met the demands lawmakers had placed upon their investigations. Existing works tending to focus on matters of quality or social science overlook the economic and regulatory aspects of congress’s activities. Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Kevin M. Mattson Professor of History 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with any undertaking of such a size and requiring such an expenditure of effort, there are a substantial number of individuals whom I must thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Mortimer J. Adler Papers 1914-1995
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Mortimer J. Adler Papers 1914-1995 © 2006 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 3 Information on Use 3 Access 3 Citation 3 Biographical Note 3 Scope Note 5 Related Resources 5 Subject Headings 5 INVENTORY 5 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.ADLERM Title Adler, Mortimer J.. Papers Date 1914-1995 Size 224.5 linear feet (154 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A. Abstract Mortimer Jerome Adler, philosopher, educator, writer. The Mortimer J. Adler Papers include information on his work with the Great Books, Encyclopaedia Britannica, and the Institute for Philosophical Research as well as material relating to his many publications. The collection consists of articles, correspondence, manuscripts, memoranda, newspaper clippings, notes, reading lists, reprints, and other materials relating to the career of Mortimer J. Adler. Information on Use Access This collection is open for research but is currently unprocessed and may contain information that falls into certain administrative restriction categories. Administrative and budget material is restricted for up to 50 years. Citation When quoting material from this collection, the preferred citation is: Adler, Mortimer J.. Papers, [Box #, Folder #], Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library Biographical Note Mortimer Jerome Adler was born on December 28, 1902 in New York City. His father, Ignatz, an immigrant from Bavaria, worked as a jeweler and his mother, Clarissa, was a former teacher. When he was fourteen, Adler dropped out of DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx and went to work as a secretary and a copy boy for the New York Sun.
    [Show full text]