DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF EPUB} Television Fraud the History and Implications of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF EPUB} Television Fraud the History and Implications of The Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Television Fraud The History and Implications of the Quiz Show Scandals by Kent Anderson Television Fraud: The History and Implications of the Quiz Show Scandals by Kent Anderson. Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this reCAPTCHA to demonstrate that it's you making the requests and not a robot. If you are having trouble seeing or completing this challenge, this page may help. If you continue to experience issues, you can contact JSTOR support. Block Reference: #0dfa9e20-ce3c-11eb-b781-7deb85178a3d VID: #(null) IP: 116.202.236.252 Date and time: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:44:49 GMT. 1950s quiz show scandals. The American quiz show scandals of the 1950s were a series of revelations that contestants of several popular television quiz shows were secretly given assistance by the show's producers to arrange the outcome of an ostensibly fair competition. The quiz show scandals were driven by a variety of reasons. Some of those reasons included the drive for financial gain, the willingness of contestants to "play along" with the assistance, and the lack of current regulations prohibiting the rigging of game shows. [1] The $64,000 Question became the first big-money television quiz show during the 1950s, and the most publicized quiz scandals surrounded that program in addition to Twenty One and Dotto . [1] In 1956, the Jack Barry-hosted game show Twenty One featured a contestant, Herb Stempel, coached by producer Dan Enright to allow his opponent to win the game. The matter was brought into focus in 1958 when Enright was revealed to have rigged the show; this revelation caused networks to cancel their entire lineups of quiz shows. Charles Van Doren was another contestant on Twenty One who eventually came forth with revelations about how he was persuaded to accept specific answers during his time on the show. [2] These elements of the scandal were portrayed in the 1994 movie Quiz Show . As a result, many contestants' reputations were tarnished. In 1960, the United States Congress amended the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit the fixing of quiz shows. As a result of that action, many networks canceled their existing quiz shows and replaced them with a higher number of public service programs. [2] Most networks also imposed a winnings limit on their existing and future game shows, which would eventually be removed by inflation and the rise of the million-dollar jackpot game shows starting in 1999. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc. 347 U.S. 284, [3] that quiz shows were not a form of gambling; this paved the way for their introduction to television. The prizes of these new shows were unprecedented. Contents. Revelation. Herb Stempel was a contestant on Twenty One who was coached by the show's producer Dan Enright. While Stempel was in the midst of his winning streak, both of the $64,000 quiz shows were in the top-ten rated programs but Twenty One did not have the same popularity. Enright and his partner Albert Freedman were searching for a new champion to replace Stempel to boost ratings. They soon found what they were looking for in Charles Lincoln Van Doren. Charles Van Doren was an English teacher at Columbia University when a friend suggested he try out for a quiz show. Skeptical at first, Van Doren decided to try out for the quiz show Tic-Tac-Dough because of the possible money a contestant could win. Enright, who produced both Tic-Tac-Dough and Twenty One , saw Van Doren's tryout and was familiar with his prestigious family background that included multiple Pulitzer Prize-winning authors and highly respected professors at Columbia University. As a result, Enright felt that Van Doren would be the perfect contestant to be the new face of Twenty One . [4] As part of their plan, the producers of Twenty One arranged the first Van Doren-Stempel face-off to end in three ties. This strategy paid off as millions of viewers tuned in the next week to watch. Although the manipulation of the contestants on Twenty One helped the producers maintain viewer interest and ratings, the producers had not anticipated the extent of Stempel's resentment at being required to lose the contest against Van Doren. [5] After achieving winnings of $69,500, Stempel's scripted loss to the more popular Van Doren occurred on 5 December 1956. One of the questions Stempel answered incorrectly involved the winner of the 1955 Academy Award for Best Motion Picture. (The correct answer was Marty , one of Stempel's favorite movies; as instructed by Enright, Stempel gave the incorrect answer On the Waterfront , winner of Best Picture the previous year.) After his preordained loss, Stempel spoke out [To whom?] against the operation, claiming that he deliberately lost the match against Van Doren on orders from Enright. Initially Stempel was dismissed as a sore loser, but in August 1958 some evidence came to light that bolstered his credibility. Ed Hilgemeyer, a contestant on Dotto , announced that he had found a notebook containing the very answers contestant Marie Winn was delivering on stage (the daytime and nighttime versions of the show were both cancelled on August 15, 1958). The final stroke, however, came from Twenty One contestant James Snodgrass, who was found to have sent registered letters to himself containing the advance answers. Such evidence was considered irrefutable. It eventually emerged that the September 12, 1956 debut of Twenty One had gone so badly that sponsor Geritol called producers Enright and Jack Barry the following day and demanded changes. Under pressure, Enright and Freedman decided to rig the show. Jack Barry, co-owner of Barry-Enright Productions and the show's host, was not involved in the actual rigging, but later helped in the cover-up. By October 1958, the story was widely known and the quiz shows' Nielsen ratings plunged. The networks denied any knowledge and canceled the now-suspicious shows. The American public's reactions were quick and powerful when the quiz show fraud became public: between 87% and 95% knew about the scandals as measured by industry-sponsored polls. [6] Meanwhile, New York prosecutor Joseph Stone convened a grand jury to investigate the charges. Many of the coached contestants, who had become celebrities due to their quiz-show success, were so afraid of the social repercussions that they were unwilling to confess to having been coached, even to the point of perjuring themselves to avoid backlash. The judge sealed the grand jury report for unknown reasons. The 86th United States Congress, by then in its first session, quickly saw the political opportunity the scandals offered; in October 1959, the House Committee on Legislative Oversight, under Representative Oren Harris's chairmanship, began to hold hearings investigating the scandal. Patty Duke, then a child actress who had competed on The $64,000 Challenge (a companion show to The $64,000 Question ), testified to having been coached, as did Stempel, Snodgrass and Hilgemeyer. The gravity of the scandal was confirmed on November 2 when Van Doren said to the Committee in a nationally-televised session that "I was involved, deeply involved, in a deception. The fact that I too was very much deceived cannot keep me from being the principal victim of that deception, because I was its principal symbol." Aftermath. Law and politics. The entire matter was called "a terrible thing to do to the American people" by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. [7] The rapid growth of television as a new technology in the 1950s occurred at such a rate that laws and prohibitions could not keep up. This medium was so new that people recognized neither its dangers nor its potential for manipulation. All of the regulations regarding television at that time were defined under The Federal Communications Act of 1934, which dealt with the advertising, fair competition, and labeling of broadcast stations. The Act and regulations written by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) were indefinite in regards to fixed television programs. Due to the fact that there were no specific laws regarding the fraudulent behavior in the quiz shows, it is debatable whether the producers or contestants alike did anything wrong. Instead, it could be inferred that the medium was ill-used. [5] After concluding the Harris Commission investigation, Congress passed a law prohibiting the fixing of quiz shows (and any other form of contest). [8] These public hearings triggered amendments passed to the Communications Act in 1960. Therefore, the bill that President Eisenhower signed into law on September 13, 1960, was a fairly mild improvement to the broadcast industry. It allowed the FCC to require license renewals of less than the legally required three years if the agency believes it would be in the public interest, prohibited gifts to FCC members, and declared illegal any contest or game with intent to deceive the audience. [5] However, at the time, while the actions may have been disreputable, they were not illegal. As a result, no one went to prison for rigging game shows. The individuals who were prosecuted were charged because of attempts to cover up their actions, either by obstruction of justice or perjury. Contestants. Many quiz show contestants' reputations were ruined. , who had become a regular on NBC's The Today Show , lost his job in the television industry. He was also forced to resign his professorship at Columbia University. Van Doren took a job as an editor at Encyclopædia Britannica earning about 20% of what he had been paid on The Today Show , and continued working as an editor and writer until his retirement in 1982.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Reporter, November 7, 1956
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works The Reporter Archives 1956 The Reporter, November 7, 1956 How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/bb_arch_reporter/312 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE . ���ili ( .. r,.•3) � r\ "Have WondeTful : (S .. P,g•5) • I<. Ep QR1!!1��t� COCCICf'JtU•� Only Volume LI . 1 ·o. 8 By Subscription Former City Mid-East Conflict Affects Students E.�. student t Council' Pres. the male gathering, felt more than shor survey by this paper f?und WI ns $44,000 By James Cox t r t t t a little relieved. For to them, �n- tha mo e studen s a he Busmess The overflowing crowds in the t . t r t o her Korean-tyre ?ol!ce ac 10n Center are reading mo e news- elevision lounge and Lounge C t . t r r n OW l Wins M al t t would mean_ rad g m their tex - pape s to bone, up on the wa Q TV sh ed watching and lis ening o President m t t t t r t t agains Isa:real, Eisenhower speak to he na ion books f�r ifles; to some for he Egyp is figh ing Herb Stempel who was once ewbold Morris, former pres­ t t France, and England. r t t Wednesday e,,ening pointed up he second ime.
    [Show full text]
  • Blurring Fiction with Reality: American Television and Consumerism in the 1950S
    Blurring fiction with reality: American television and consumerism in the 1950s On the evening of 15 October 1958, veteran correspondent Edward R. Murrow stood at the podium and looked out over the attendees of the annual Radio Television Digital News Association gala. He waited until complete silence descended, and then launched into a speech that he had written and typed himself, to be sure that no one could possibly have had any forewarning about its contents. What followed was a scathing attack on the state of the radio and television industries, all the more meaningful coming from a man who was widely acknowledged as not only the architect of broadcast journalism but also a staunch champion of ethics and integrity in broadcasting.1 This was the correspondent who had stood on the rooftops of London with bombs exploding in the background to bring Americans news of the Blitz, whose voice was familiar to millions of Americans. This was the man who had publicly eviscerated the redbaiting Senator Joseph McCarthy, helping to put an end to a shameful period in America’s history (see e.g. Mirkinson, 2014, Sperber, 1986). And it became apparent that evening that this was also a man bitterly disappointed with the “incompatible combination of show business, advertising and news” that the broadcasting industry had become: Our history will be what we make it. And if there are any historians about fifty or a hundred years from now, and there should be preserved the kinescopes for one week of all three networks, they will there find recorded in black and white, or color, evidence of decadence, escapism and insulation from the realities of the world in which we live.
    [Show full text]
  • CBS, Rural Sitcoms, and the Image of the South, 1957-1971 Sara K
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Rube tube : CBS, rural sitcoms, and the image of the south, 1957-1971 Sara K. Eskridge Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Eskridge, Sara K., "Rube tube : CBS, rural sitcoms, and the image of the south, 1957-1971" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3154. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3154 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. RUBE TUBE: CBS, RURAL SITCOMS, AND THE IMAGE OF THE SOUTH, 1957-1971 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Sara K. Eskridge B.A., Mary Washington College, 2003 M.A., Virginia Commonwealth University, 2006 May 2013 Acknowledgements Many thanks to all of those who helped me envision, research, and complete this project. First of all, a thank you to the Middleton Library at Louisiana State University, where I found most of the secondary source materials for this dissertation, as well as some of the primary sources. I especially thank Joseph Nicholson, the LSU history subject librarian, who helped me with a number of specific inquiries.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class
    North East Journal of Legal Studies Volume 35 Spring/Fall 2016 Article 5 3-20-2017 Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class Sharlene A. McEvoy Fairfield Universty, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb Recommended Citation McEvoy, Sharlene A. (2017) "Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class," North East Journal of Legal Studies: Vol. 35 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/nealsb/vol35/iss1/5 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 91 / Vol 35 / North East Journal of Legal Studies Using the “Quiz Show” Scandals to Teach Issues of Ethics and the Media in a Business Law Class by Dr. Sharlene A. McEvoy ABSTRACT It was a big deal in the late 1950s but many students have difficulty understanding what the fuss was all about when it was revealed that television quiz shows were rigged.
    [Show full text]
  • In an Enemy of the People, As We Watch Brothers Battle Over the Fate
    TunedBy Kellie Mecleary, Production Dramaturg, and Matthew Buckley Smith In In An Enemy of the People, as we watch brothers battle over the fate of their town, it is worth noting the role that the town paper, The People’s Daily Messenger, plays—the various ways in which it contributes to the machinations and outcome of the plot. The paper is a powerful tool, and its use in the play reflects the use of mass media in other times. In Arthur Miller’s day, the media that was fast becoming a central part of American life was television: as it grew in scope and influence, it took on the role of both informing and reflecting American society and culture. These pages provide an overview of the late ’50s and early ’60s through the major shows and events that dominated the small screen at the time. I Love Lucy used his celebrity to run for president in technology wholeheartedly. The television For the dazzling, six-year run of the show, 1952, gaining almost 40 times as many program Disneyland skillfully promoted an I Love Lucy would remain conservative votes in Democratic primary elections as eponymous amusement park that opened in content and innovative in technique. Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson. Party several months later to such popularity Lucy, the scheming, ebullient housewife leadership, however, favored Stevenson, that in only two-and-a-half years it marked of Cuban bandleader Ricky Ricardo, never who went on to lose to General Dwight its 10-millionth visitor. With a hit theme earns her own money but never stops D.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Hearings Into Cultural Regulation
    Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulation, 1953-1967 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Shawn M. Selby August 2008 © 2008 Shawn M. Selby. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulatoin, 1953-1967 by SHAWN M. SELBY has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Kevin M. Mattson Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 2 ABSTRACT SELBY, SHAWN M., Ph.D., August 2008, History Congress, Culture and Capitalism: Congressional Hearings into Cultural Regulation, 1953-1967 (439 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Kevin M. Mattson This dissertation describes the series investigations and hearings into cultural regulation that took place before the U.S. congress between 1953 and 1967. Beginning with Senate inquiries into juvenile delinquency and ending with the creation of the public broadcasting system in 1967, the dissertation argues that lawmakers and witnesses repeatedly emphasized internal industry oversight and the power of competition within the culture industry to regulate cultural products like comic books, movies and television. Public television was seen as a solution to the problem that met the demands lawmakers had placed upon their investigations. Existing works tending to focus on matters of quality or social science overlook the economic and regulatory aspects of congress’s activities. Approved: _____________________________________________________________ Kevin M. Mattson Professor of History 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with any undertaking of such a size and requiring such an expenditure of effort, there are a substantial number of individuals whom I must thank.
    [Show full text]
  • The $64,000 Question (1955 – 1968) Host: Hal March
    COM308 Week 4 Notes—Quiz Show Scandal Purpose Today we are going to consider the formative years of TV and the quiz show scandal's impact on the TV business and a naive America. Background When CBS premiered "The $64,000 Question" in 1955, the show was more than a hit; it was a national phenomenon. No program in the short history of television had ever attracted so many viewers so quickly -- 47 million in ten weeks. Audiences loved the idea of watching people like themselves compete for huge sums of money by answering tough questions. "The common man as genius," one writer called it. More quiz shows followed, including "Twenty One" and "Tic Tac Dough." At the times these shows aired, the crime rate and movie theatre attendance actually dropped. What the viewing audience was to learn, but only much later, was that many of the TV quiz shows were fixed. Initially, popular contestants were favored with easier questions; they were "rehearsed" by the show's producers for hours before airtime. When producer Dan Enright saw ratings plummet for his show "Twenty One," he went even further, providing contestants with answers before air time. To make the charade convincing, Enright coached his hand-picked winners down to the smallest detail: when to stutter, mop their brow, bite their lip, even how to dress. The most famous of these contestants was Charles Van Doren. Young, intelligent, and handsome, Van Doren was "a bona fide egghead with enough sex appeal" to create a sensation. Slowly and painfully, the deceit unraveled. When a Congressional investigation revealed that wholesome Van Doren and the quiz shows were a fraud, Americans felt angry and betrayed.
    [Show full text]
  • How the FCC Fights Fake Reality Shows with 47 USC
    CHAPMAN LAW REVIEW Citation: George Brietigam, Keeping it Real: How the FCC Fights Fake Reality Shows with 47 U.S.C. 509, 22 CHAP. L. REV. 369 (2019). --For copyright information, please contact [email protected]. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY | FOWLER SCHOOL OF LAW | ONE UNIVERSITY DRIVE | ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92866 WWW.CHAPMANLAWREVIEW.COM Do Not Delete 5/22/2019 8:38 PM Keeping it Real: How the FCC Fights Fake Reality Shows with 47 U.S.C. 509 George Brietigam* I. INTRODUCTION The early 2000s was an exciting time for primetime entertainment. A new breed of television program was sweeping the nation’s airwaves that would forever change the American zeitgeist—reality television.1 Survivor (2000) is widely credited as the series that popularized and defined the modern concept of reality television.2 Commentators almost universally regard Mark Burnett’s pioneering program as the first commercially successful reality game show, and the numbers back up their assertion. During the summer of 2000, an average of 28.3 million viewers tuned into CBS Wednesday nights to see which “survivor” would be the next to be “voted off” the island.3 The show’s finale attracted an unprecedented 51.1 million viewers,4 greatly surpassing anyone’s wildest expectations, beating out the World Series, NBA finals, NCAA men’s basketball finals, and the Grammy Awards of that year.5 To put Survivor’s first season viewership in perspective, Game of Thrones, the most watched show during the summer of 2017, only attracted an average of 13.1 million viewers (less than * J.D. Candidate, Expected May 2019, Chapman University Dale E.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam C. Nedeff¶S Game Show Collection 5,358 Episodes Strong As of 3/23/2010
    Adam C. Nedeff¶s Game Show Collection 5,358 Episodes Strong as of 3/23/2010 I: Game Shows II: Game Show Specials III: Unsold Game Show Pilots IV: My Game Show Box Games I: Game Shows ABOUT FACES {1 episode} Tom Kennedy¶s big break as announcer/substitute host. -Episode with Tom Kennedy filling in for Ben Alexander (End segment missing) [AF-1.1/KIN] ALL-STAR BLITZ {2 episodes} You might as well call it ³Hollywood Square of Fortune.´ -Sherlyn Walters, Ted Shackleford, Betty White, Robert Woods (Dark picture but watchable) [ASB- 1.1/OB] -Madge Sinclair, Christopher Hewitt, Abby Dalton, Peter Scolari [ASB-1.2/OB] ALL-STAR SECRETS {3 episodes} Overly-chatty celebrity guessing game. -Conrad Bain, Robert Gulliame, Robert Pine, Dodie Goodman, Ann Lockhart [AlStS-1.1/OC] -David Landsberg, Eva Gabor, Arnold Schwarzenegger(!), Barbara Feldon, David Huddleston (First two minutes missing) [AlStS-1.2/OC] -Bill Cullen, Nanette Fabray, John Schuck, Della Reese, Arte Johnson [AlStS-1.3/OC] BABY GAME {1 episode} Question: On Match Game, you had to make a match to win. On Dating Game, you had to make a date to win. How did you win on a show called Baby Game? -George & Carolyn vs. Gloria & Lloyd [BG-1.1/KIN] BANK ON THE STARS {2 episodes} A pretty nifty memory test with the master emcee. -Johnny Dark, Mr. Hulot¶s Holiday, The Caine Mutiny; Roger Price appears to plug ³Droodles´ [BOTS- 1.1/KIN] -The Long Wait, Knock on Wood, Johnny Dark [BOTS-1.2/KIN] BATTLESTARS {6 episodes} Alex Trebek just isn¶t right for a ³Hollywood Squares´-type show.
    [Show full text]
  • Schadenfreude, Social Identity, and American Media Culture A
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Laughing at the World: Schadenfreude, Social Identity, and American Media Culture A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of Radio/Television/Film By Amber Eliza Watts EVANSTON, ILLINOIS June 2008 2 Copyright by Amber Watts 2008 All rights reserved 3 Contents Abstract __________________________________________________ 4 Acknowledgements _________________________________________ 6 One Introduction: Laughing at the World___________________________ 8 Two The Reality of Schadenfreude and the Schadenfreude of Reality ___ 44 Three Misery, Transformation, and Happy Endings ___________________ 80 Four Love Hurts ______________________________________________ 134 Five Notoriety, Scandal, and Why We Love to Hate Celebrities ________ 203 Bibliograph y ____________________________________________ 259 4 ABSTRACT Laughing at the World: Schadenfreude , Social Identity, and American Media Culture Amber Watts This project explores historical questions of televisual form and cultural production, centering on the proliferation of media texts that mobilize real-life misfortune as a form of entertainment in U.S. television and culture. Specifically, it examines how a variety of “reality” formats in contemporary television stage and exploit spectacles of failure, defeat, suffering, and humiliation for the pleasure of the viewing audience. These texts speak to a wide range of emotional engagements, from pity and sympathy to pure schadenfreude
    [Show full text]
  • Quiz Show 1994
    \ "America has always taken tragedy lightly." --Henry Adams sooW f Kristint Atukne.n. 10349 Caribou. Lant i,fl Los Angtfes, CA 90077 Revised 8/25/93 - green J 1 INT. AUTOMOBILE SHOWR~OM - WASHINGTON - DAY A HAND caresses the luscious curves of a 1958 CHRYSLER 300D CONVERTIBLE, lacquered white, dripping with bright showroom light. The hand belongs to DICK GOODWIN, late 20s. A muttering stew of arrogance, insecurity, and dandruff. He chews a fat cigar as a SALESMAN circles. GOODWIN so this is the 300. The Salesman rattles perfunctorily through his pitch. Doesn't think this kid can afford the car ••• SALESMAN The Forward Look -- 1960 is here today. That's the Ermine White. Power steering, power windows, power brakes, power mirrors, and the new Auto-Pilot -- all make you virtually superfluous ••. GOODWIN I'm not sure I need a car for that. SALESMAN The new TorqueFlite transmission * the standard that sets the standard. * The ragtop operates with just the touch of a button. GOODWIN I can feel the wind in my hair * already. * SALESMAN Let me guess. Just out of school? * GOODWIN Harvard Law. I was first in my class. * * SALESMAN (brightening) That degree sells itself. * GOODWIN I've been working for the government. (CONTINUED) Revised 8/25/93 - green 2 l CONTINUED . -1 SALESMAN ,,..... (crestfallen) Oh. ·* GOODWIN Not that it's permanent. SALESMAN (brightening) Would you like to get behind the wheel, Mr. Goodman? GOODWIN Goodwin. SALESMAN Just be careful with the cigar. With one seamless motion, the Salesman whips out his hankie behind Goodwin's back, buffs the spot where Goodwin had been leaning, then ushers Goodwin into the car.
    [Show full text]
  • Springfield News Sun Collection
    Springfield News-Sun Collection - Non-Local People Files A-Z Person/Place Association/Associated With Date/Date Range Aames, Willie Actor 6/1980 Aaron, Hank Baseball player 7/1987 Abbot, George Broadway musical writer & director 4/17/1987 Abdul, Paula Video choreographer 12/1987 Abdul-Jabber, Kareem Basketball player c 1990's Abeles, Sara Young actress 7/1987 Abraham, F. Murray Actor 2/1985 Abrahams, Jim Actor 8/1992 Abril, Victoria Actress 7/1987 Ackerman, Michael Actor 7/1987 Acuff, Roy Country singer; died 11/23/1992 1987 to 11/24/1992 Adams, Ansel U. S. landscape photographer 2/20/1902 to 4/22/1984 Adams, Brooke Actress 6/1987 Adams, Bryan Rock singer 6/1992 Adams, Don Actor 1969 to 7/1987 Adams, Edie Actress 7/1987 Adams, Julie Actress 7/1987 Adams, Mason Actor 7/1987 Adams, Maud Actress 7/1987 Adamson, George Conservationist and author of "Born Free" 8/20/1989 Adjani, Isabella Actress 6/1987 Adkins, Trace Country singer 1998 Adler, Dr. Mortimer Author, educator 2/20/1983 Affleck, Ben Actor 2000 Ahmed, Kamal Actor 1994 Aiello, Danny Actor 7/1987 Aiken, Liam Young actor Ajaye, Franklin Actor 7/1987 Akers, Karen Actress 6/1987 Akins, Claude Actor 1979 to 1/28/1994 Al Saud, Sultan Bib Abdulaziz, Prince Crown prince of Saudi Arabia 1970's Alaio, Rose Actress 7/1987 Albee, Edward Pulitzer-prize winning playwright 1980's and 1990's Albert, Eddie Actor 11/1952 to 7/1987 Albert, Will Actor 7/1987 Alcott, Louisa May U. S. novelist 1832 to 1888 Alda, Alan Actor 12/1980 Alda, Robert Actor; father of Alan Alda 7/1987 Alexander, Erika Actress
    [Show full text]