DOCSLIB.ORG

BIH Chapter 06

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIH Chapter 06 73. CHAPTER VI. THE LINCOLNSHIRX CEAUMONTS - TJTJ CP-RLTON TOWERS FA'diLY. "Our acts, our angsls are, or good or ill, Our fatal shadovs (disguisesj that walk by us still." Beaumont and Fletcher, UPON AN HONEST MAN' S FORTUNE, 11. 499, Darleg Ed. Arms, Quarterly first and fourth, arg. a lion, rampant, sa. for Stapleton second and third, argr two bars, and in chief, three escallo9s az for Errington, Motto: "Mieux sera". (Better times are coming). Genealogical chart shewing Lhe connection of %he family on the female side with theRoyal houses of England and Portugal. Raymond Berenger,Count of Provence, married Seatrix daughter I of Thomas, Count of Savoy. -----------___-____-__________________________L I I I I Margare t Eleanor mar- SouchLer Beatrice married ried Henry married marr i ed S. Louis IX I11 King of Richa1.d Charles I King of England Earl of Earl of Franc e I Cornwall Anjou l King of King of I the Jerusalem, Naples and I Romans Sicily; son of Louis 1 VI11 of France I ---I I I l I Edward I 3:dmund Crouch- Charles I1 Louis of I back, 1st. Earl King of' Bri enne Edwara I1 of Lancaster Jerusalem married I ----_---.---_ Agnes Edward I1 I I l Vicomtesse I Thomas 2nd Henry Plan- de I Earl of tagenet Srd Beaumont I Lancaster Earl of l I Lancaster I I l I I I 1 (Edward 111) (Henry Plantagenet (Vicomtesse de Beaumont) I Earl 3rd of Lan- I l aaater) I I -- l I I I I I I Richard I1 John of I Theobald LGuis Henry 1st Gaunt I Vicomte de Bishop Baron married I Bellomonte of I Blanche 1 ArchbishopDurham I grand- I of Paris I daughter Henry lat I of Sir Duke of I I Henry de Lancaster, John Isabei mar- Beaumontmarried 2nd Baron ried Henry I Isabel married 1st Duke of I daughterEleanor Lancaster I of Sir great- I I Henry de grancl- 1 Beaumont daughter I 1st Baron of Henry Blanche I I 111 (see married John I I C.T. p. 79 of Gaunt I I for con- I I I tinuation) I I Phi 1 i gga I I I married Jchn I Uaud Blanche King of I married Portugal I John of I Gaunt l I I Henry IV Edward Fnilippa 1 marri ea I John King I of Portugal Henry V 1 I Philippa I married Philip Henry VI the Good Duke of Burgundy 75. Descent of the Family according to Barnes, Burton and Debrett from the Kings of' France. Louis VI11 King of France. I I I I l I S. Louis Robert Alphonso John CharlesI Count of Anjou and IX . Proyence King of Jerusalem, Naples and Sicily. I I I I Charles 11 Louis of Brienne King of Jerusalem married Agnes Naples and Sioily. Vicomtesse de Beaumont (see p. 60). Sir Bernard Burke says that Louis of Brienne is descended from Gauthier, Count of Brienne; 'cut the Pleur de lys in the family coat ot' xrms seems tc bespeak his descent from the Kings of.' France, whilst the lion is that of Brienne. A gossibla solution of the difficulty is that Agnes married twice and each husbandhad the same Christian name. LOUIS VI11 of France, Le Lion, born 1187 married Blanche daughter Of Alphonso VIJI, King of Castile and grand-daughter of Henry I11 of England and niece of King John. Issue I. S. Louis IX. 11. Charles and others. CHARLES I t'ifth son of Louis VIII, Count of AnJou, King of Jerusalem, Naplesand Sicily, born 1226, died 1285, married Beatrix daughter and heiress of Rayrnond Berenger, Count of Pr0venc.e. Issue. I. Charles 11, King of Jt?r;xsalem, inherited the French estates, born 1250 and died 1309, he accompanied his brother S. Louis to the Crusades, and was taken prisoner in Egypt; he returned to Provenc? in 1250 and was cro':ine;i King or Naples and Sicily in 1289 (ENCY. BRIT.) 11. Louis of Brienne, rnarrisd Agr-es daughter and heiress of' Richard Vicomte de Bellomonte. The children of the txarrizgz wssumed theirmother's name, the eldest son inherited the Vicomty and the French estates. Descent of Louis of Brienne according to Burke. Gauthier, Count of Brienne. - I 1 I I Andre Eraud John Marie d.8.p. I I I l I Gauthier John William King of Jerusalem I --. - YolanaeAlphonse Marie John lolante Louis I" married married Am88 Prederick Vicorntesse 8on of the de Emperor Henry Beaumont. VI, he thereby became King of Naples Sicily and Jerusalem. (Cox CRUSADES p. 184). GAUTHIER, Count of Brienne and King of Naples, died in Apulia, Italy, he had the reputation of being a great hero. (Michaud, HIST. CRUSADES, 11. 289). He married Alix daughter of ana had issue three son3 and one daughter, the second son was Eraud, ancestor of Louis of Brienne. EMUD, became heir to his father on the daath of his elder brother without issue, He married Aqnefs de Montbelliard, and had issue three son8 the second son being John. , JOHN, born 1148 died 1237/8. He went to the fifth Crusade in 1228 - a Walter of Brienne also took part - John attacked the Moslems in Egypt, and besiegt.d tind took by storm Damietta situatedat the mouthof the Nile (ENCY. BRIT. j He captured Constantinople in 1204 and ruled there for nine years. Jo~ephUichaud the eighteenth centv.ryFrench historian in his HISTOIRE DES CROISADES, (11. 288) says "John of Brienne, whom fortune had mad? for 8 short period Eing of Jerusalem, was called to the tottering throne of Constantinople, at the moment that the Greeks and Bulgarians, animated by the ardours of pillage, were afthe gates or" the Capital. Their r'leets penetrated to the prt, their ncImerous bsttalions were preparing to scala the ramparts, but the new Emperor fought severs1 battles wixh them, and obtzlned possession of their ships :incl dispersed their srmies. These victories added greatlyto his renown. Philip Mouskr?s, apoet who died 1274 compared him in the following lines to Hector, Roland or Judas Maccabeus : "N'aie, Ector, Roll' ne Ogiers, ne Judas Maahebeus li fiers tsntne fit D'arres en estors corn fist li Rois Jehans cel 3ors et i 1 defors et il dedans La paru sa force et ses sens Et li hardement qu'il avoit." This may be xransl:<%ed somewhat as follows wNeither HectJr, Roland nor Roger, nor JudasAtaccabeus the brave, did such feats of arms in hietory as did King John of Jerusalem and he without rnd he within there (the City) shewed his strength and wicdom nnd the courage whichhe had." "Late in life he laid aside the imperial purple,breathing his last sigh in the habit of a Francisean friar. Thus passed the sop-in-law cf two kings and the father-in-law of NO emperors. He leYt, when rlieing, the remembrance of Xis extraordinary exploits.z,nd the example of a wonderful destiny' (Michaud Kistoire des Crojsades.) He married, 14th September 1209, Marie, daughter and heiress of Ccnradi and Isabella. de Monstiffard and grand- daughter of Almeric, King of Jerusalem (Sibbons DECLINE AND FALL, VI, 432). On the aea.th of Almeric, his grand-daughter succeeded to the throne;the eccle3iastical and civil dignitaries forrrard5;d a request., through ths Bishop of Acre and the Lord of Cesarea, to King Philip of' France to select a husband for the Queen. John of Brienne was chosen, as he was considered by the European Knights to ba a braye man, wise in council and experienced in wzr. He landed at Acre and was crocvned Eing with great pompon his wedding day (Ch. Mills, CRUSADES 11. 216). He resigned the kingship c. 1226 in favour or' his son-in-law Freaerick I1 the Emperor of Germany (Fuller's HOLY WAR, p. 288) who had married Iolanto in 1222. Bdarie died in 1219, and in 1223 John married Berengaria daughter of Alphonse IX King of Castile ana Leon, second cousin to Edward 11, this explains Henry de Beaumont 78. being style2 "Consanguineus Regis". Berengaria died 12th April 1237. They had issue three sons and three daughters (Bee SUPRA). LOUIS OF BRIENNE AND D'ACRE, third son of John, died 1283. He spent a good deal of his time at the Court of Alpncnse Eing of Castile. In 1265 he gave $1,200 to the Chatreuse Ccnvlvnt at DioquP. He married February L253 Agnes daughter and heiress of Richard Vicomte de Bellomonte and de Mayne (see pp. 60, 81). 79. THE LINCOLNSHIRE AND CARLTON TOWERS FAMILY. Agnes Vicomtesse de Bellomonte married Louis of Brienne I ~ ~ ~~~~ I Henry 1 I I I I I Theobald 1st Baron Jeanne Isa- Marie Louis Mar- John inherited inherited be1 d.s.p. garet founded the the the Brench English Brench estates estatesfamily d.8.g. I I I I I I I I I I I I John Rich- John Thomas Alice Eliz- Joan Isabel Bea- Cath- d.s.p. ard 2nd I d.8.p. abeth married trix arine d.s.g. Baron I Henry i Earl of I Lancaster I I I l I I Thomas Brancis Andrew p- - Henry I I I 3rd Thomas )laud Blanche Baron d.6.p. married I John of Gaunt I I I I John Henry Richard Thomas 4th Baron -I I I I I I I I Henry Thomas Richard Eliz. Eleanor MargaretCecilia 6th founder Baron of the I Cole Orton I family I I I I I I I John 6th Henry Alainor Katharine Anne Margaret Elizabeth Baron 1st founder of Viscount the Wednesbury I family I I 1 I I John Henry William7th MaryJoane d.s.p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the Welles Family in England
    HISTORY OFHE T WELLES F AMILY IN E NGLAND; WITH T HEIR DERIVATION IN THIS COUNTRY FROM GOVERNOR THOMAS WELLES, OF CONNECTICUT. By A LBERT WELLES, PRESIDENT O P THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OP HERALDRY AND GENBALOGICAL REGISTRY OP NEW YORK. (ASSISTED B Y H. H. CLEMENTS, ESQ.) BJHttl)n a account of tljt Wu\\t% JFamtlg fn fHassssacIjusrtta, By H ENRY WINTHROP SARGENT, OP B OSTON. BOSTON: P RESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. 1874. II )2 < 7-'/ < INTRODUCTION. ^/^Sn i Chronology, so in Genealogy there are certain landmarks. Thus,n i France, to trace back to Charlemagne is the desideratum ; in England, to the Norman Con quest; and in the New England States, to the Puri tans, or first settlement of the country. The origin of but few nations or individuals can be precisely traced or ascertained. " The lapse of ages is inces santly thickening the veil which is spread over remote objects and events. The light becomes fainter as we proceed, the objects more obscure and uncertain, until Time at length spreads her sable mantle over them, and we behold them no more." Its i stated, among the librarians and officers of historical institutions in the Eastern States, that not two per cent of the inquirers succeed in establishing the connection between their ancestors here and the family abroad. Most of the emigrants 2 I NTROD UCTION. fled f rom religious persecution, and, instead of pro mulgating their derivation or history, rather sup pressed all knowledge of it, so that their descendants had no direct traditions. On this account it be comes almost necessary to give the descendants separately of each of the original emigrants to this country, with a general account of the family abroad, as far as it can be learned from history, without trusting too much to tradition, which however is often the only source of information on these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Maker
    Ancestors of Ulysses Simpson Grant Generation No. 1 1. President Ulysses Simpson Grant, born 27 Apr 1822 in Point Pleasant, Clermont Co., OH; died 23 Jul 1885 in Mount McGregor, Saratoga Co., NY. He was the son of 2. Jesse Root Grant and 3. Hannah Simpson. He married (1) Julia Boggs Dent 22 Aug 1848. She was born 26 Jan 1826 in White Haven Plantation, St. Louis Co. MO, and died 14 Dec 1902 in Washington, D. C.. She was the daughter of "Colonel" Frederick Fayette Dent and Ellen Bray Wrenshall. Generation No. 2 2. Jesse Root Grant, born 23 Jan 1794 in Greensburg, Westmoreland Co., PA; died 29 Jan 1873 in Covington, Campbell Co., KY. He was the son of 4. Noah Grant III and 5. Rachel Kelley. He married 3. Hannah Simpson 24 Jun 1821 in The Simpson family home. 3. Hannah Simpson, born 23 Nov 1798 in Horsham, Philadelphia Co., PA; died 11 May 1883 in Jersey City, Coventry Co., NJ. She was the daughter of 6. John Simpson, Jr. and 7. Rebecca Weir. Children of Jesse Grant and Hannah Simpson are: 1 i. President Ulysses Simpson Grant, born 27 Apr 1822 in Point Pleasant, Clermont Co., OH; died 23 Jul 1885 in Mount McGregor, Saratoga Co., NY; married Julia Boggs Dent 22 Aug 1848. ii. Samuel Simpson Grant iii. Orville Grant iv. Clara Grant v. Virginia "Nellie" Grant vi. Mary Frances Grant Generation No. 3 4. Noah Grant III, born 20 Jun 1748; died 14 Feb 1819 in Maysville, Mason Co., KY. He was the son of 8.
    [Show full text]
  • King Robert the Bruce
    King Robert the Bruce By A. F. Murison KING ROBERT THE BRUCE CHAPTER I THE ANCESTRY OF BRUCE When Sir William Wallace, the sole apparent hope of Scottish independence, died at the foot of the gallows in Smithfield, and was torn limb from limb, it seemed that at last 'the accursed nation' would quietly submit to the English yoke. The spectacle of the bleaching bones of the heroic Patriot would, it was anticipated, overawe such of his countrymen as might yet cherish perverse aspirations after national freedom. It was a delusive anticipation. In fifteen years of arduous diplomacy and warfare, with an astounding expenditure of blood and treasure, Edward I. had crushed the leaders and crippled the resources of Scotland, but he had inadequately estimated the spirit of the nation. Only six months, and Scotland was again in arms. It is of the irony of fate that the very man destined to bring Edward's calculations to naught had been his most zealous officer in his last campaign, and had, in all probability, been present at the trial—it may be at the execution—of Wallace, silently consenting to his death. That man of destiny was Sir Robert de Brus, Lord of Annandale and Earl of Carrick. The Bruces came over with the Conqueror. The theory of a Norse origin in a follower of Rollo the Ganger, who established himself in the diocese of Coutances in Manche, Normandy, though not improbable, is but vaguely supported. The name is territorial; and the better opinion is inclined to connect it with Brix, between Cherbourg and Valognes.
    [Show full text]
  • For a Pdf of This Short Feature, Click Here
    Scotland’s forgotten medieval king By Matthew Hammond If you pick up any popular history of Scotland’s kings and queens, chances are you will find no mention of Edward Balliol. Yet Edward was crowned king of Scots at Scone on 24 September, 1332, enthroned by the earl of Fife and anointed by the bishop of Dunkeld, with a bevy of worthies in attendance. Edward certainly had a reasonable claim to the kingship. His father, John Balliol, had been inaugurated at Scone in 1292 and reigned until 1296, when King Edward I invaded and stripped King John of his royal insignia, making him an ‘empty coat’ (‘Toom Tabard’ in Scots). Yet Balliol almost certainly had the superior claim to the Scots throne after the deaths of Alexander III (1286) and Margaret of Norway (1290), and Scottish patriots like William Wallace continued fighting in John’s name for years after his humiliating defeat. Image: Seal of King Edward Balliol - reverse Edward, John’s son, was already about 49 years old when he was crowned king of Scots, having spent a life of privilege and luxury, growing up in the courts of the future Edward II as well as his cousin John de Warenne, earl of Surrey. After his father’s death in 1314, Edward succeeded to the Balliol estates in France, centred on the château of Hélicourt in Vimeu in Picardy. Edward’s potential claim to the Scottish kingship became the focus for a group of nobles disinherited by Robert I. Some of these had been Scottish families who fled the kingdom, Balliol adherents and Bruce enemies like the MacDougalls of Lorn in Argyll, or the MacDowalls in Galloway.
    [Show full text]
  • ISABEL DE BEAUMONT, DUCHESS of LANCASTER (C.1318-C.1359) by Brad Verity1
    THE FIRST ENGLISH DUCHESS -307- THE FIRST ENGLISH DUCHESS: ISABEL DE BEAUMONT, DUCHESS OF LANCASTER (C.1318-C.1359) by Brad Verity1 ABSTRACT This article covers the life of Isabel de Beaumont, wife of Henry of Grosmont, Duke of Lancaster. Her parentage and chronology, and her limited impact on the 14th century English court, are explored, with emphasis on correcting the established account of her death. It will be shown that she did not survive, but rather predeceased, her husband. Foundations (2004) 1 (5): 307-323 © Copyright FMG Henry of Grosmont (c.1310-1361), Duke of Lancaster, remains one of the most renowned figures of 14th century England, dominating the military campaigns and diplomatic missions of the first thirty years of the reign of Edward III. By contrast, his wife, Isabel ― the first woman in England to hold the title of duchess ― hides in the background of the era, vague to the point of obscurity. As Duke Henry’s modern biographer, Kenneth Fowler (1969, p.215), notes, “in their thirty years of married life she hardly appears on record at all.” This is not so surprising when the position of English noblewomen as wives in the 14th century is considered – they were in all legal respects subordinate to their husbands, expected to manage the household, oversee the children, and be religious benefactresses. Duchess Isabel was, in that mould, very much a woman of her time, mentioned in appropriate official records (papal dispensation requests, grants that affected lands held in jointure, etc.) only when necessary. What is noteworthy, considering the vast estates of the Duchy of Lancaster and her prominent social position as wife of the third man in England (after the King and the Black Prince), is her lack of mention in contemporary chronicles.
    [Show full text]
  • BIH All Chapters
    "The glory of children are their Fathers." Proverbs XVII. 6. The Beaumonts in History A.D. a50 - m60 W Edward T. Beaumont, J.P., 1, Staverton Road, OXFORD. Author of Ancient Memorial Brasses, Academical Kabit illustrated by Memorial Brasses and Three Interesting Hampehire Brasses. Member of the OxEord Architectural and Historical Society. "Pur remernbrer des ancessoura Li fez B li diz B li mours .. , .. Li felonies des felons B li barnages des barons" (1) Le Roman de Rou L.I., Wace, 1100-1184. (1) To commemorate the deeds, the sayings, ,md manners of our ancestor3 and to tell of the evil acts oI" felons and the feats of arms of the barom. i. ~ONT~NT~. Rage Introductory ii Chapter I The Norsemen 1 W I1 The Norman Family - TheEarls of Leicester 9 111 W - The Earls of Warwick 36 W IV n - The Earls of Worcester 49 n V The Devonshire Beaumonts 56 W VI TheLincolnshire - The CarltonTowers Bzmily 73 VI1 The Laicestershire - The Cole Orton Family 118 VI11 N - The Grace Dieu 148 1) IX W - The Stoughton Qrange 174 W x n - The Barrow on Trent 190 W XI W - The BucklandCourt and Hackney 196 " XI1 W - The Wednesbury 201 XI11 n - The Elarrow on Soar W 204 " XIV The Suf.folkBeaumonts - The Hadleigh 206 W xv W n - The Coggeshall 248 " XVI n W - The Dunwich 263 XVII The Yorkshire Whitley- The 257 XVIII W W - The Bretton ana Hexham Abbey 'I 297 " XIX l1 W - The Bridgford Hill 310 n M[ n W - The Lascells Hall and Mirfield 315 XXI W W - The Caltor, Family It 322 Conolusion 324 THE BIGAUMDNTS IN HISTORY INTRODUCTORY.
    [Show full text]
  • "?3<AC7D 43CA@7D" <@ E:7 D75A@6 :3>8 A8 E:7 C7<9@ A8
    D96 !>2;@B6C 32B@?6C! ;? D96 C64@?5 92=7 @7 D96 B6;8? @7 65F2B5 ;$ ")*/(%)+(.# 56B6< 2& 32BB;6 2 DNKWOW CYHROXXKJ LTV XNK 5KMVKK TL AN5 GX XNK ESOZKVWOX] TL CX 2SJVK[W )//) 7YQQ RKXGJGXG LTV XNOW OXKR OW GZGOQGHQK OS BKWKGVIN1CX2SJVK[W07YQQDK\X GX0 NXXU0''VKWKGVIN%VKUTWOXTV]&WX%GSJVK[W&GI&YP' AQKGWK YWK XNOW OJKSXOLOKV XT IOXK TV QOSP XT XNOW OXKR0 NXXU0''NJQ&NGSJQK&SKX')((*+',-/, DNOW OXKR OW UVTXKIXKJ H] TVOMOSGQ ITU]VOMNX DNOW OXKR OW QOIKSWKJ YSJKV G 4VKGXOZK 4TRRTSW =OIKSWK THE ~IORBS BAROBBS IN THE SECOND HALF OF rHE REIGN OF EDWARD I (1290-1307) Derek A. Barrie Submitted for the degree of Ph.D., University of St.Andrews 30 September 1991 ABSTRACT The second half of the reign of Edward I saw the emergence;of a parliamentary peerage in embryo. The maiores barones comprising it owed their position to regular individual summonses to parliament and to major military campaigns of the period, particularly in Scotland. This was ~I coupled with either substantial wealth based on landholdings, though not a particular type of tenure, or a lengthy record of loyal service to the Crown either in one particular area of local or national government or over a range of activities. Service to the Crown, outwith provision of advice and counsel in parliament and cavalry service in major campaigns, was not as widespread as many historians have argued. Such service was primarily, though not exclusively, local, performed in counties where maiores barones had their principal estates. It covered military activity outwith major campaigns; keeperships of castles; preparations for war; the administration of justice; dependency government; diplomatic service overseas and the royal household.
    [Show full text]
  • 1321 to 1330
    ' EELATING TO SCOTLAND. 139 Edward II. prisoners ia liis custody to the sheriff of Suffolk, to be taken to the Tower of London. Shottle. [Close, 15 Echo. II. m. S8.] 132L 741. Safe conduct for the servants of the K.'s niece Maria countess Nov. 25. of Fife, coining from Scotland to make purchases for her in London. Foedera, li. 460. lUeford. [Patent, 15 Edw. 11. p. 1, m. 9] Nov. 29. 742. David de Strabolgi earl of Athol, declares that, as the K. has granted to him in perpetuity the castle, manor, and honour of Chil- ham in Kent, he will aid and serve him in all his enterprises, on pain of forfeiture. Pountfreit-on-Thames, 29th November 15th year. [Close, 15 Edw. II. m. SI, dorse.'] [1320-21, 743. Petition to the K. by John bishop of Carlisle, shewing how after the K. commanded him to go to Newcastle-on-Tyne at the Purifica- Feb. 2.] tion in his 14th year, in embassy with other magnates to treat with the Scots, where he remained nine weeks at great expense, and begging for some allowance in respect of these costs. [No date.] (Endorsed) It seems to the K. and Council that, since he went for the common good of the K., the realm, and his own bishopric, and did not go far out of the latter, he must bear his own expenses. [Parlia')ne7itary Petitions, No. SIOO.] 1321-22. 744 Warrant to the keepers of the Great seal to issue a commis- Jan. 30. sion to Dovenald de Mar to take possession in tlie K.'s name of Newerk castle, with its ' garnesture,' &c., and hold it for him during pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • 'My Well-Beloved Companion': Men, Women, Marriage and Power in The
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History ‘My Well-Beloved Companion’: Men, Women, Marriage and Power in the Earldom and Duchy of Lancaster, 1265-1399 by Rebecca Holdorph Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2016 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ‘MY WELL-BELOVED COMPANION’: MEN, WOMEN, MARRIAGE AND POWER IN THE EARLDOM AND DUCHY OF LANCASTER, 1265-1399 Rebecca Elizabeth Holdorph Contemporary debate about what marriage is and who should be allowed to enter into it is often based in assumptions about ‘traditional’ historical marriage. The study of marriage in the Middle Ages is particularly relevant: this period saw the emergence of the establishment of many marriage patterns that exist today.
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 to 1313
    CALENDAR OF DOCUMENTS BELATINQ TO SCOTLAND. EDWARD II. 1307. 1. riab for allocate to Thomas de la Hyde sheriff of Cornwall, and July 20. Thomas de Ealegh sheriff of Devon for the sustenance, &c., of Scottish prisoners from Stirling castle, received into Launceston castle on Sunday 13th September 1304, till Tuesday 18th July 1307, viz., Godfrey le Buttiller [died 11th June 1307], William Gi£fard, Henry Laghtan of Dumler in Twedale [died 8th March 1306-7], Gilecrist de la Cuisine, Gilecrist de Carrik [died 18th July 1307], and Adam Picard, the first two at Zd., the others at 2d. per diem ; %Ql. 19s. Id. in all. [Chancery Files, Bundle No. 138.'] July 30. 2. Letter to Monsire Hugh de Neville from his vallet Euweyn, mentioning that the Archbishop is well—that the late K. Edward's body lay at Eichmond on Saturday (29th)—the Archbishop this Sunday leaves Scroby to attend it—that the 'Patriark,' the Earl of Lincoln, and other magnates, did homage at Carlisle to the new K., and have accompanied him into Scotland against the enemy. Scroby, ' le Dymange avantdit.' \_Duchy of Lancaster Grants, &c. (A) 368.] Trace of small seal on back. Aug. 1. 3. The K. commands the keeper of hia late father's stores at New castle to deliver all the wines there to William de Brichulle his vallet, 1st August first of his reign. Eothenanne. [Exchequer, Q. B. Miscellanea No. {Army), ^-f.] No seal. Aug. 5. 4. Letters patent by Huufrai de Bohun earl of Hereford and Essex and constable of England, and Elizabeth his 'Conpaigne,' appointing Monsire William Poucy or Sire Aundreu de Kynbauton their constable of Plesitz, as attorneys to receive seisin of the manors of Wrytele, Badewe, Hatfeud, and Brounesho, and all the other lands VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 Newsletter
    Scottish Heritage USA NEWSLETTER JULY-AUG 2020 Crannog Loch Tay (Outer Hebrides) ISSUE #2-2020 ARTIFICIAL ISLANDS OLDER THAN STONEHENGE ? Study of crannogs in Scotland’s Outer Hebrides reveals some were built more than 3,000 years earlier than A previously thought. The artificial structures, which are usually around 30 to 100 feet in diameter (crannogs) are now typically covered with vegetation as no grazing animals can reach them. There are numerous examples of these “little islands” on the west coast of Scotland and on the islands of the Outer Hebrides. They are frequently made of timber and stone and are occasionally built on existing rocky structures. Until now, researchers thought most were built when people in the Iron Age (800-43 B.C.) created stone causeways and dwellings in the middle of bodies of water. However, in a recent paper published in the journal Antiquity leads us to believe that some of Scotland’s crannogs are much older – perhaps 3,000 years older – making them part of the Neolithic Age (4,000-2,5000 B.C.). The idea that crannogs may date as far back as the Neolithic resulted from a 1980’s excavation of an Iron Age islet in a lake on Scotland’s North Uist island when archaeologists discovered they were excavating a Neolithic site. But until more recently no other crannogs yielded Neolithic evidence. In 2012 a local diver found unmistakable Neolithic pottery in the water around crannogs in the Outer Hebrides. Continued on Page Three - See “Crannogs” Loch Tay Crannog House Loch Tay Crannog House LETTER FROM OUR PRESIDENT AND UPDATE ON GAELIC STUDIES Alas we shall not be subscriptions and several books, we were pleased with the response.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Arms—As Attributed, Adopted Or Documented
    EARLY ARMS—AS ATTRIBUTED, ADOPTED OR DOCUMENTED Steen Clemmensen Almost 60 years ago Anthony Wagner, the late Garter King of Arms, tentatively con- cluded that ‘heraldry was coming into use and taking formal shape for a generation or more before our first clear evidence for it.’1 Other armorists have hinted at the same opinion, but few have tried to substantiate it. Even Wagner himself did not really put forward arguments, other than to list a handful of early armorial seals from all over Europe dated to the period from 1136 to 1159. There are least two, interconnected reasons for this reticence. The first is the obvious shortage of data, which almost with- out exception come from seals. Very few seals have survived from the twelfth cen- tury, and only three families provide seals for more than one individual (Candavène- Saint-Pol, Clare, and Savoy). The second reason derives from the unwillingness of most scholars to speculate without having documentary evidence on which to build their hypotheses and arguments. If we accept Wagner’s conclusion though we might more appropriately call it a hypothesis—there are several families that we might expect to have adopted armo- rial emblems around or shortly after 1100, i.e. at the conclusion of the First Crusade (without proposing any relation between the two). But to what extent, in which order, and at which social level did this happen? The problem facing us in substantiating the hypothesis can be reformulated in more general terms: is it possible to date an adop- tion of arms to before it is documented? Speculation has been engaged in for more than a hundred years.
    [Show full text]