DOCSLIB.ORG

The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report Articles Crafting the Final Judgment Chris Dove Permissive Interlocutory Appeal and Mandamus: Picking Your Procedural Path Prudently Kennon L. Wooten & Robyn B. Hargrove Special Feature An Interview of Chief Justice John T. Boyd Tim Newsom Volume 30, Number 4 Winter 2018 The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report Vol. 30, No. 4 · Winter 2018 Editor’s Corner Jody Sanders & Julia Peebles ........................................................ 417 Chair’s Report Justice Brett Busby .......................................................................418 Nominations Welcomed for the Texas Appellate Hall of Fame .. 422 Crafting the Final Judgment Chris Dove ...................................................................................423 Permissive Interlocutory Appeal and Mandamus: Picking Your Procedural Path Prudently Kennon L. Wooten & Robyn B. Hargrove .......................................444 An Interview of Chief Justice John T. Boyd Tim Newsom ................................................................................482 United States Supreme Court Update Matthew H. Frederick, Andrew Guthrie, Sean O’Neill, Ryan Paulsen, & Taylor Whitlow Hoang ....................................... 491 Fifth Circuit Update Kelli B. Bills, Natasha Breaux, & Ryan Gardner .....................548 Texas Supreme Court Update Jason N. Jordan, Chris Knight, & Patrice Pujol ......................564 Texas Courts of Appeals Update Andrew B. Bender ........................................................................642 Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Update John R. Messinger ........................................................................648 THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE II The State Bar of Texas Appellate Section 2018-19 Officers 2018-19 Council Chair Terms Expiring 2019: Hon. J. Brett Busby April Farris Supreme Court of Texas Hon. Rebecca A. Huddle [email protected] William C. “Bill” Little Chair-Elect Terms Expiring 2020: Kent Rutter Perry Cockerell Haynes Boone Jackie Stroh [email protected] Audrey Vicknair Vice-Chair Terms Expiring 2021: Jerry Bullard Hon. Gina Benavides Adams, Lynch & Loftin Rich Phillips [email protected] Tom Leatherbury Treasurer State Bar Board Advisor Dylan Drummond Bob McKnight Gray Reed Supreme Court Liaison [email protected] Hon. James Blacklock Secretary Editors Lisa Hobbs Jody S. Sanders Kuhn Hobbs [email protected] [email protected] Julia Peebles Immediate Past Chair [email protected] Mike Truesdale Associate Editors Second Past Chair Erin Glenn Busby Steve Hayes Parth Gejji Brytne Kitchin Kyle Lawrence Habib Olapade Bryce Perry Lonnie Schooler Henry Segelke Kristen Vander-Plas Nicholas J. Wagoner Copyright © 2019 Appellate Section, State Bar of Texas. All Rights Reserved. Email: [email protected] Website: www.tex-app.org Twitter: @AppAdvoc THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE III Editor’s Note Dear Readers, This issue continues our tradition of great articles from section members on topics of appellate interest. If you have an article or an article idea, we would love to hear from you. Please contact us with your proposals. And, if you are not a section member, we still would love your submissions and, more importantly, your membership in the section. Please visit our section website http://www.tex-app.org/ to see all of the potential membership benefits. Jody Sanders Julia Peebles [email protected] [email protected] THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE 417 Chair’s Report J. Brett Busby, Justice, Supreme Court of Texas As a lawyer who has spent his career specializing in appeals on both sides of the bench, I am honored to chair the Appellate Section this year. The work of the Section is off to a great start thanks to our Council members and committee chairs, who are among the best of the best in the appellate bar. If you are not yet a member of one of our committees and would like to meet and work with these fine lawyers, please contact me to discuss how you can get involved. Here are some highlights of recent projects and plans for the upcoming year: Online CLE. The Section offers many valuable member benefits, including free CLE videos that you can watch for credit by logging into our website at www.tex-app.org. Thanks to Online CLE Committee Chairs Marla Broaddus and Steve Hayes, we add new videos regularly on topics of interest to appellate practitioners. In addition, the chairs of our Local Bar CLE Committee, Tom Leatherbury and Connie Pfeiffer, have developed partnerships with several local bar appellate sections that will allow us to include videos of some of their recent CLE programs. Legislative update. As the 86th Texas Legislature begins its session, stay up to date on developments in Austin with Jerry Bullard’s excellent legislative update emails. In his emails, Jerry identifies bills that would affect trial or appellate litigation or the judiciary, and he updates readers on their progress through the legislative process. If you would like to receive these emails, contact Jerry at [email protected]. Coffees with the Courts. Our Judicial Liaison Committee, chaired by Chief Justice Sandee Marion and former Justice Jason Boatright, is planning coffees that will give our members an opportunity to meet the new justices on many of our courts of appeals. More information on these coffees is coming soon. Amicus Committee. Do you have an appeal that raises an issue of importance to Section members? If so, remember that the Appellate Section operates an active Amicus Committee. The THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE 418 committee carefully screens requests for amicus participation. If the Section authorizes the committee to author a brief, the committee finds a lawyer willing to write a brief on behalf of the Section on a pro bono basis. The completed brief is then reviewed by the State Bar of Texas prior to filing. The purpose of the Amicus Committee is not so much to advocate for a particular outcome in a particular case, but to express the Section’s position that a key issue in a case warrants resolution by the court, either because of inconsistency in treatment of the issue by other appellate courts or because the issue is a novel one that the Section believes should be decided—one way or the other—for the benefit of its members, the courts, and those with cases before the courts. To request an amicus brief or volunteer to author a brief, please contact Amicus Committee Chairs Audrey Vicknair ([email protected]) and Brandy Voss ([email protected]). Forms Committee. The Section has a new Forms Committee, which is creating a list of frequently filed appellate motions and will make forms for those motions available to our members on the Section website. If you have a form motion to suggest, please send your idea and a sample motion to Forms Committee Chairs Lucy Forbes ([email protected]) and Karen Precella (karen. [email protected]). Get involved. Our success as a Section is due to the hard work of many volunteers participating in a wide range of projects. Serving on committees, as a council member, and as an officer has given me the opportunity to work with and learn from talented appellate specialists across Texas on issues of importance to the Section’s membership, the judiciary, and the parties in our appellate courts. We have a wide variety of opportunities for you to participate in the work of the Section. I invite you to review the list of committees on our website (www.tex-app.org) and contact me if you are interested in getting involved. We will welcome you gladly. I look forward to talking with you about becoming active in the Section and hearing your ideas on how the Section can best serve our members. J. Brett Busby Chair, State Bar of Texas Appellate Section [email protected] THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE 419 Disclaimer Contributions to the Appellate Advocate are welcome, but we reserve the right to select material to be published. We do not discriminate based upon the viewpoint expressed in any given article, but instead require only that articles be of interest to the Texas appellate bar and professionally prepared. To that end, all lead article authors who submit an article that materially addresses a controversy made the subject of a pending matter in which the author represents a party or amici must include a footnote at the outset of the article disclosing their involvement. Publication of any article is not to be deemed an endorsement of the views expressed therein, nor shall publication of any advertisement be considered an endorsement of the product or service advertised. THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE 420 THE APPELLATE ADVOCATE 421 Nominations Welcomed for the Texas Appellate Hall of Fame The Appellate Section of the State Bar of Texas is now accepting nominations for the Texas Appellate Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame posthumously honors advocates and judges who made a lasting mark on appellate practice in the State of Texas. Hall of Fame inductees will be honored at a luncheon presentation and ceremony held by the Appellate Section during the State Bar’s Advanced Civil Appellate Practice course on Thursday, September 5, 2019. Nominations should be submitted in writing to [email protected] no later than Monday, July 15, 2019. Please note that an individual’s nomination in a prior year will not necessarily carry over to this year. As a result, if you nominated someone previously and would like to ensure his/ her consideration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Order Establishing the Judicial Commission on Mental Health
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS AND THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Supreme Court Misc. Docket No. 18-9025 Court of Criminal Appeals Misc. Docket No. 18-004 ORDER ESTABLISHING JUDICIAL COMMISSION ON MENTAL HEALTH ______________________________________________________________________________ Recognizing that improving the lives of Texans who are affected by mental health issues and are involved in the justice system requires judicial leadership at the highest level, in June 2016 the Supreme Court of Texas directed the Texas Judicial Council to establish a Mental Health Committee. The Court charged the Mental Health Committee with examining best practices in the administration of civil and criminal justice for persons with mental illness. The Mental Health Committee determined that Texas requires additional resources to ensure that: (1) mental health providers and professionals are able to provide timely and complete mental health assessments; (2) community-based mental health services are available to defendants; (3) outpatient treatment services and education services are available to those providing competency restoration services; (4) inpatient mental health facilities other than those operated by the Department of State Health Services are available for purposes of competency restoration; and (5) jail-based competency restoration programs, either state-funded or county-funded or both, are available. The Texas Legislature invests heavily each year in behavioral and mental health systems to address mental illness and associated disorders. Yet the criminal justice system still serves as a default provider of mental health services for many Texans. This impact is most often felt at the local level where jail costs related to mental illness exceed $50 million each year in some counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Benedict's Maritime Bulletin
    Vol. 11, No. 2 Second Quarter 2013 Dr. Frank L. Wiswall, Jr., Editor-in-Chief Robert J. Zapf, Managing Editor Inside This Issue A ‘‘No-Frills’’ Primer on Iran Sanctions A ‘‘No-Frills’’ Primer on Iran Sanctions By David H. Sump ............................................ 61 By David H. Sump EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION – LOZMAN: THE I. Introduction IMPORTANCE OF THE CONTEXT As almost everyone in the maritime community is By F. L. Wiswall, Jr. ......................................... 63 aware, much of the world is in the midst of severe The Upside Down World of Lozman economic sanctions against Iran. These sanctions have been invoked not only by the United States, but also by By Francis X. Nolan, III, Esq............................ 72 the European Union, the United Nations, and other Lozman’s ‘‘Reasonable Observer’’ and nations around the world. Although the purpose of Where It Will Go From Here these sanctions is to modify the behavior of a ‘‘rogue nation’’ that allegedly is defying international norms and By Brendan Sullivan.......................................... 77 obligations, the sanctions are also visiting great harm Substitute Security, In Rem Jurisdiction, upon the maritime trade community. This article is Appellate Jurisdiction, and Lozman intended to briefly explain the nature and status of the economic sanctions imposed upon Iran, as well as iden- By Samuel P. Blatchley..................................... 83 tify the risks to the maritime community and provide WINDOW ON WASHINGTON solutions for avoiding or minimizing those risks. By Bryant E. Gardner ........................................ 86 II. What Are Sanctions and Why Are They Used? FLOTSAM & JETSAM Economic sanctions are the tools used by the inter- national community to assert pressure and hardship By Phil Berns....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judge – Criminal District Court
    NONPARTISAN ELECTION MATERIAL VOTERS GUIDE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF HOUSTON EDUCATION FUND NOVEMBER 6, 2018 • GENERAL ELECTION • POLLS OPEN 7AM TO 7PM INDEX THINGS VOTERS United States Senator . 5. SHOULD NOW United States Representative . .5 K PHOTO ID IS REQUIRED TO VOTE IN PERSON IN ALL TEXAS ELECTIONS Governor . .13 Those voting in person, whether voting early or on Election Day, will be required to present a photo Lieutenant Governor . .14 identification or an alternative identification allowed by law. Please see page 2 of this Voters Guide for additional information. Attorney General . 14. LWV/TEXAS EDUCATION FUND EARLY VOTING PROVIDES INFORMATION ON Comptroller of Public Accounts . 15. Early voting will begin on Monday, October 22 and end on Friday, November 2. See page 12 of this Voters CANDIDATES FOR U.S. SENATE Guide for locations and times. Any registered Harris County voter may cast an early ballot at any early voting Commissioner of General Land Office . .15 AND STATEWIDE CANDIDATES location in Harris County. Our thanks to our state organization, Commissioner of Agriculture . 16. the League of Women Voters of VOTING BY MAIL Texas, for contacting all opposed Railroad Commissioner . 16. Voters may cast mail ballots if they are at least 65 years old, if they will be out of Harris County during the candidates for U.S. Senator, Supreme Court . .17 Early Voting period and on Election Day, if they are sick or disabled or if they are incarcerated but eligible to Governor, Lieutenant Governor, vote. Mail ballots may be requested by visiting harrisvotes.com or by phoning 713-755-6965.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer Financing the Judiciary in Texas 2016
    3140_Judiciary Primer_2016_cover.ai 1 8/29/2016 7:34:30 AM LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Financing the Judiciary in Texas Legislative Primer SUBMITTED TO THE 85TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF SEPTEMBER 2016 Financing the Judiciary in Texas Legislative Primer SUBMITTED TO THE 85TH LEGISLATURE FIFTH EDITION LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF SEPTEMBER 2016 CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 State Funding for Appellate Court Operations ...........................................................................13 State Funding for Trial Courts ....................................................................................................21 State Funding for Prosecutor Salaries And Payments ................................................................29 State Funding for Other Judiciary Programs ..............................................................................35 Court-Generated State Revenue Sources ....................................................................................47 Appendix A: District Court Performance Measures, Clearance Rates, and Backlog Index from September 1, 2014, to August 31, 2015 ....................................................................................59 Appendix B: Frequently Asked Questions .................................................................................67 Appendix C: Glossary ...............................................................................................................71
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2020 the Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report Vol
    The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report Articles The 2019 Texas Legislature and Appellate Practice: Laws Enacted and Proposed Elizabeth Lee Thompson Social Media Use and Appellate Practice: Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls John G. Browning Special Feature Appellate Section Oral History Project: The Honorable Margaret Mirabal Interviewed by Justice Tim Taft Transcribed by Shannon Irion Morris Volume 31, Number 2 Summer 2020 The Appellate Advocate State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Report Vol. 31, No. 2 · Summer 2020 Chair’s Report Kent Rutter ..................................................................................239 The 2019 Texas Legislature and Appellate Practice: Laws Enacted and Proposed Elizabeth Lee Thompson ...............................................................244 Social Media Use and Appellate Practice: Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls John G. Browning ........................................................................254 Juidical Selection Report .........................................................262 Appellate Rules Subcommittee’s Report on TRAP Survey Results to the State Bar of Texas Appellate Section Officer’s Council .......................................264 Appellate Section Oral History Project: The Honorable Margaret Mirabal Interviewed by Justice Tim Taft Transcribed by Shannon Irion Morris ............................................ 275 Appellate Section’s 2020 Excellence in Appellate Advocacy Award Susannah E. Prucka .....................................................................283
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Rule? Or What Have the Courts Declared Is a Rule?
    What is a Rule? Or What Have the Courts Declared is a Rule? Nichole Bunker‐Henderson, Office of the Texas Attorney General 8/29/2013 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not reflect the official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General. The objective of this paper is to take a comprehensive look at the burgeoning jurisprudence regarding the determination of when an agency statement constitutes a rule under the Texas Administrative Procedure Act (APA). While there were a steady number of substantive rule challenges1 brought pursuant to section 2001.038 of the APA during the past twenty years, the number of recent procedural challenges alleging illegal ad hoc rulemaking has increased since the Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion in El Paso Hospital District v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission2 in 2008. In that case, the court held that the agency engaged in impermissible ad hoc rulemaking when the cut-off date that the agency used to calculate certain claims conflicted with the cut-off date in the agency’s formal rule.3 The court’s finding of illegal ad hoc rulemaking in that case appears to have reinvigorated interest in this area of the law. During the past five years, there has been a steady increase in procedural rule challenges filed and numerous opinions written by the Texas courts of appeals about whether certain agency statements amount to unpublished rules and thereby violate the APA. One of the earliest court of appeals opinions citing to the Supreme Court’s 2008 El Paso Hospital District opinion was the Third Court of Appeals’ opinion in Combs v.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notebook
    THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Judicial Commission on Mental Health May 15, 2018 Meeting Notebook The State Bar of Texas – Texas Law Center 1414 Colorado Street Austin, Texas 78701 Judicial Commission on Mental Health May 15, 2018 Meeting Notebook TABLE OF CONTENTS Agenda ................................................................................................................................1 Commissioner Directory ...................................................................................................2 Planning Committee Report .............................................................................................3 Order Establishing the Judicial Commission on Mental Health/Order Appointing the Judicial Commission on Mental Health .....................................................................4 Financial Report ................................................................................................................5 Texas Judicial Council Report and Presentation ............................................................6 Media ...................................................................................................................................7 INSERT TAB 1 Judicial Commission on Mental Health State Bar of Texas, Texas Law Center Austin, Texas May 15, 2018 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. AGENDA 9:30 Welcome Chief Justice Nathan Hecht Presiding Judge Sharon Keller 9:45 Establishing a Judicial Commission on Mental Health Justice Jeff Brown Judge Barbara Hervey 10:00
    [Show full text]
  • Lozman V. Riviera Beach, 568 U
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2017 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus LOZMAN v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17–21. Argued February 27, 2018—Decided June 18, 2018 After petitioner Lozman towed his floating home into a slip in a marina owned by the city of Riviera Beach, he became an outspoken critic of the City’s plan to use its eminent domain power to seize waterfront homes for private development and often made critical comments about officials during the public-comment period of city council meet- ings. He also filed a lawsuit alleging that the City Council’s approval of an agreement with developers violated Florida’s open-meetings laws. In June 2006 the Council held a closed-door session, in part to discuss Lozman’s lawsuit. He alleges that the meeting’s transcript shows that councilmembers devised an official plan to intimidate him, and that many of his subsequent disputes with city officials and employees were part of the City’s retaliation plan. Five months after the closed-door meeting, the Council held a public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration, Retaliation, and Jurisdiction
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2020 12/01/2020 Article 19 2020 Immigration, Retaliation, and Jurisdiction Daniel E. Simon Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Simon, Daniel E. (2020) "Immigration, Retaliation, and Jurisdiction," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2020 , Article 19. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2020/iss1/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Immigration, Retaliation, and Jurisdiction Daniel Simon† I. INTRODUCTION When federal officials told Ravidath Ragbir that they were deport- ing him because of his immigration activism, no one could stop them.1 This unreviewability was by design — a feature, rather than a bug, of our immigration laws. Federal law curtails the ability of aliens facing removal from the United States to seek relief through habeas corpus: No federal court may exercise habeas jurisdiction over a claim by an alien challenging her removal, regardless of whether that claim is stat- utory or constitutional in nature.2 While this limitation presents broader problems for immigrants in detention, its impact is particularly pronounced in the context of selective or retaliatory enforcement. Ragbir’s case demonstrates the dangers of this general rule. Rag- bir — an alien deportable as a result of a federal wire fraud conviction — has spent years organizing for more lenient immigration policies. That advocacy led a senior official from Immigration and Customs Enforce- ment to admit that he was deporting Ragbir because of his advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Ethics and Malpractice Issues for Appellate Lawyers
    LEGAL ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE ISSUES FOR APPELLATE LAWYERS Presented By: DAVID L. HORAN Jones Day RANDY JOHNSTON Johnston Tobey 3308 Oak Grove Avenue Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 741-6260 Phone (214) 741-6248 Fax Email Address: [email protected] Written By: DAVID L. HORAN1 Jones Day 2727 N. Harwood St. Dallas, Texas 75201 [email protected] State Bar of Texas 26TH ANNUAL ADVANCED CIVIL APPELLATE PRACTICE COURSE September 6–7, 2012 Austin CHAPTER 17 1 The views expressed are solely those of the author and should not be attributed to his firm or its clients. EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS David L. Horan PNC Bank (formerly, National City Bank) secures complete appellate victory before the Dallas Court Partner of Appeals Special Committee of the Board of Directors of MoneyGram International defeats motion for preliminary injunction seeking to block recapitalization of MoneyGram Specialty Products and Bondex International seek [email protected] bankruptcy protection Dallas AREAS OF FOCUS +1.214.969.4548 (T) Issues & Appeals +1.214.969.5100 (F) State & Local Taxation Class Action & Multidistrict Litigation David Horan focuses on appellate litigation and analyzing and briefing complex HONORS & DISTINCTIONS issues before federal and state courts at all levels. He has extensive appellate "Best Lawyers in Dallas," D Magazine (2011 & 2012) experience and has conducted oral argument before the United States Supreme Court, federal and state courts of appeals, and federal trial courts. David's practice Texas Super Lawyers "Rising Star" (every year since 2005) extends to all aspects of litigation, and he has substantial experience litigating class action issues and challenges to arbitration awards.
    [Show full text]
  • After the Verdict: What Do I Do Now?
    AFTER THE VERDICT: WHAT DO I DO NOW? Kimberly S. Keller KELLER STOLARCZYK PLLC www.kellsto.com 234 W. Bandera #120 Boerne, Texas 78006 Phone: 830-981-5000 [email protected] 28TH Annual Labor and Employment Law Institute August 25-26, 2017 San Antonio, Texas AFTER THE VERDICT: WHAT DO I DO NOW?, KIMBERLY S. KELLER KIMBERLY S. KELLER, APPELLATE ATTORNEY, PERSONAL HIGHLIGHTS LICENSES-ADMISSIONS: Bar of Texas Admitted in Supreme Court of United States, Multiple Circuit Courts of Appeals (Fifth, Eighth, Eleventh), and all Federal District Courts in Texas and Arkansas TRIAL EXPERIENCE: Appellate advisor to trial lawyers complex litigation nationwide, including multi-district/class action litigation; providing assistance during pretrial (pleadings, dispositive motions) & trial stages (evidentiary issues, error preservation, jury charge, post-verdict motions) in state & federal court APPELLATE EXPERIENCE: Lead appellate counsel on over 300 direct appeals, interlocutory appeals, mandamus proceeding Supreme Court of the United States -Counsel of Record on several cases, including two Petitions for Writ of Certiorari granted by the Court (successful outcomes for client in both cases) Supreme Court of Texas -Lead appellate counsel on petitions for review & for writ of mandamus, merits briefing, & oral argument Intermediate Appellate Courts (Federal & State) -Lead appellate counsel in federal & state appeals, including direct appeals, mandamus petitions, interlocutory appeals, & oral argument -Hired at various stages of the appellate process
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Judicial Support Agencies, Boards and Commissions
    Annual Report of the Judicial Support Agencies, Boards and Commissions For The Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2017 Contents Texas Judicial Council .................................................................................................1 Office of Court Administration ................................................................................6 Executive Operations ...................................................................................6 Research and Court Services Division .........................................................7 Information Services Division ...................................................................10 Judicial Committee on Information Technology ......................................12 Legal Division .............................................................................................14 Finance and Operations Division ..............................................................15 Judicial Branch Certification Commission ...............................................18 Guardianship Compliance Pilot Project ...................................................20 Texas Indigent Defense Commission .........................................................22 The State Law Library .................................................................................26 Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney ...................................................28 State Commission on Judicial Conduct .....................................................29 Office of Capital and Forensic Writs
    [Show full text]