DOCSLIB.ORG

Parkway Plaza Neighborhood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parkway Plaza Neighborhood AUBURN BOULEVARD OVER ARCADE CREEK BRIDGE (24C0081) REPLACEMENT PROJECT [(#BRLS-5002(168))] REVISED INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ANTICIPATED SUBSEQUENT PROJECTS UNDER THE 2035 GENERAL PLAN MASTER EIR This Initial Study has been prepared by the City of Sacramento, Community Development Department, 300 Richards Boulevard, Third Floor, Sacramento, CA 95811, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.), CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) and the Sacramento Local Environmental Regulations (Resolution 91-892) adopted by the City of Sacramento. ORGANIZATION OF THE INITIAL STUDY This Initial Study is organized into the following sections: SECTION I - BACKGROUND: Provides summary background information about the project name, location, sponsor, and the date this Initial Study was completed. SECTION II - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes a detailed description of the proposed project. SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND DISCUSSION: Reviews proposed project and states whether the project would have additional significant environmental effects (project-specific effects) that were not evaluated in the Master EIR for the 2035 General Plan. SECTION IV - ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: Identifies which environmental factors were determined to have additional significant environmental effects. SECTION V - DETERMINATION: States whether environmental effects associated with development of the proposed project are significant, and what, if any, added environmental documentation may be required. REFERENCES CITED: Identifies source materials that have been consulted in the preparation of the Initial Study. A UBURN B OULEVARD OVER A RCADE C REEK B RIDGE R EPLACEMENT P ROJECT I NITIAL S TUDY Revisions have been made based upon comments received during the public review process. Revisions consisting of additions to the discussion are shown in underline text and any deletions are shown in strikethrough text. All revisions made, have been made based upon comments received that merely clarify, amplify, or make insignificant modifications and do not require recirculation pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15073.5(c). SECTION I - BACKGROUND Project Name and File Number: Auburn Boulevard over Arcade Creek Bridge (24C0081) Replac ement Project Location: City of Sacramento where Auburn Boulevard crosses Arcade Creek, east of Winding Way and west of the intersection of Park Road and Auburn Boulevard Project Applicant: Zuhair Amawi City of Sacramento Public Works Department 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Project Planner: Ron Bess, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd., Third Floor Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 808-8272 [email protected] Environmental Planner: Dewberry | Drake Haglan Date Initial Study Completed: September 4, 2020 This Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Sections 1500 et seq.). The Lead Agency is the City of Sacramento. The City of Sacramento (City), Community Development Department, has reviewed the proposed Project and, on the basis of the whole record before it, has determined that the proposed Project is an anticipated subsequent project identified and described in the 2035 General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (Master EIR) and is consistent with the land use designation and the permissible densities and intensities of use for the Project site as set forth in the 2035 General Plan. See CEQA Guidelines Section 15176 (b) and (d). The City has prepared the attached Initial Study to review the discussions of cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible significant effects in the Master EIR to determine their adequacy for the project (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15178(b),(c)) and identify any potential new or additional project- specific significant environmental effects that were not analyzed in the Master EIR and any mitigation measures or alternatives that may avoid or mitigate the identified effects to a level of insignificance, if any. As part of the Master EIR process, the City is required to incorporate all feasible mitigation measures or feasible alternatives appropriate to the Project as set forth in the Master EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15177(d)) Policies included in the 2035 General Plan that reduce significant impacts identified in the Master EIR are identified and discussed. See also the Master EIR for the 2035 General Plan. The mitigation P AGE 2 A UBURN B OULEVARD OVER A RCADE C REEK B RIDGE R EPLACEMENT P ROJECT I NITIAL S TUDY monitoring plan for the 2035 General Plan, which provides references to applicable general plan policies that reduce the environmental effects of development that may occur consistent with the 2035 General Plan, is included in the adopting resolution for the Master EIR. See City Council Resolution No. 2015-0060, beginning on page 60. The resolution is available at: http://portal.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Planning/Environmental/Impact-Reports.aspx This analysis incorporates by reference the general discussion portions of the Master EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150(a)). The Master EIR is available for public review on the City’s web site at: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Planning/Environmental/Impact-Reports.aspx The City will prepare and circulate a Notice of Availability/Notice of Intention to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOA/NOI) that invites comments regarding the issues discussed in the initial study. The NOA/NOI is posted on the Community Development Department web site at: http://www.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Planning/Environmental/Impact-Reports.aspx. The City is soliciting views of interested persons and agencies on the content of the environmental information presented in this document. Written comments should be sent at the earliest possible date, but no later than the 30-day review period ending on October 4, 2020. Please send written responses to: Ron Bess, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd, 3rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811 Direct Line: (916) 808-8272 [email protected] P AGE 3 A UBURN B OULEVARD OVER A RCADE C REEK B RIDGE R EPLACEMENT P ROJECT I NITIAL S TUDY SECTION II – PROJECT DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION The City has prepared this Initial Study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to address the environmental consequences of the proposed Auburn Boulevard over Arcade Creek Bridge (24C-0081) Replacement project (Project). The City is the Lead Agency for this Project under CEQA. The Project is funded primarily by the federal aid Highway Bridge Program (HBP) administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) through California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Local Assistance. The replacement bridge would meet current applicable City, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and Caltrans design criteria and standards. PROJECT LOCATION The Project is located near the City’s northeastern border with Sacramento County where Auburn Boulevard crosses Arcade Creek, east of Winding Way and west of Park Road and State Route (SR) 244 ramps (Appendix A: Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3). The Project area is approximately 10.4 acres in area and land uses surrounding the Projec t consist of low- to medium-density residential uses to the south, commercial/office developments to the east, and recreational uses within Del Paso Park to the north and west. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing bridge is a two-span, reinforced concrete T-beam structure that was originally constructed in 1927, and then widened in 1965. The existing bridge has a total width of 76 feet, 6 inches and a length of 70 feet. The existing lane configuration includes two through lanes in each direction of travel, one left turn lane from westbound Auburn Boulevard to Winding Way, with shoulders and sidewalks on each side of the existing bridge. The existing bridge has an average daily traffic (ADT) of 34,400 approximately 12,000 vehicles per day and conveys traffic to the SR 244 on- and off-ramps located east of the bridge. The existing Auburn Boulevard and Winding Way intersection is a signalized T-intersection, with Auburn Boulevard running north-south, and Winding Way serving as the eastern leg of the intersection. Crosswalks are provided at the south and east legs of the intersection with island refuges on the southeast and northeast corners. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED The existing vehicular bridge structure has been determined to be structurally deficient with substandard load carrying capacity and bridge roadway geometry. The 2012 Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report for the Auburn Boulevard Bridge over Arcade Creek identifies many structural deficiencies such as cracks, spalling, minor scour, and hydraulic debris collection. The maintenance reports indicate that the water level in the channel has reached the elevation of the bridge girders several times. The existing Auburn Boulevard and Winding Way Intersection operates at an acceptable level of service with stable flow. However, the existing left turn pocket on Auburn Boulevard lacks sufficient storage length since it is constrained between Winding Way and the SR 244 on/off ramps. The existing structure is located within 150 feet of the Winding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • 28Th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering
    California Indian Conference andGathering Indian Conference California October 3-5,2013 “Honor Our Past, Celebrate Our Present, and and OurPresent, Celebrate “Honor OurPast, Nurture Our Future Generations” OurFuture Nurture 28TH ANNUAL | California State University, Sacramento University, State California PAINTINGPAINTING BY LYNL RISLING (KARUK, (KARUK YUROKYUROK, AND HUPA) “TÁAT KARU YUPSÍITANACH” (REPRESENTS A MOTHER AND BABY FROM TRIBES OF NORTHWES NORTHWESTERNTERN CALIFORNIA) letter from the Planning Committee Welcome to the 28th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering We are honored to have you attending and participating in this conference. Many people, organizations and Nations have worked hard and contributed in various ways. It makes us feel good in our hearts to welcome each and every person. We come together to learn from each other and enjoy seeing long-time friends, as well as, meeting new ones. The California Indian Conference and Gathering is an annual event for the exchange of views and Information among academics, educators, California Indians, students, tribal nations, native organizations and community members focusing on California Indians. This year, the conference is held at California State University, Sacramento. Indians and non-Indians will join together to become aware of current issues, as well as the history and culture of the first peoples of this state. A wide variety of Front cover: topics will be presented, including: sovereignty, leadership, dance, storytelling, The painting is titled, “Taat karu native languages, histories, law, political and social issues, federal recognition, Yupsíitanach” (Mother and Baby). The health, families and children, education, economic development, arts, traditions painting represents a mother and and numerous other relevant topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California
    UC Merced The Journal of California Anthropology Title Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rg7c5vf Journal The Journal of California Anthropology, 4(1) Authors Swezey, Sean L Heizer, Robert F Publication Date 1977-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Scaffold for A-frame net fbhing. Karok man pladn( net Into water. Ca. 1900. After Krocber and Barrett (1962:Plate 2). Courtesy of the Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley. Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California SEAN L. SWEZEY ROBERT F. HEIZER THNOGRAPHERS at times are more nets, toggle harpoons, and application of bo­ Econcerned with reporting data than tanical fish poisons. interpreting them. As a result, ethnographies Whereas the material aspects of fishery often have the appearance of being little more technology form a basic and informative part than collections of facts organized by a gener­ of the ethnographic record, the potential im­ ally standardized topical outline. Synoptic portance of specialized ritual procedures surveys may result from an effort to synthesize undertaken at the inception of anadromous a particular trait, custom, or complex, and fish runs has generally been overlooked. from these there often results a deeper insight Through much of Northern California, ritual into the function and purpose of what, in injunctions and social control mechanisms unanalyzed form, seem to be cultural prac­ were instituted by specific "ritual specialists" tices which are illogical or meaningless. We (formulists, shamans, and moiety chiefs) at the attempt here to review native ritual, belief, and outset of the first major seasonal migrations of ceremony connected with anadromous fish in salmon.
    [Show full text]
  • Central California Native Americans
    Central California Native Americans By: Janessa Boom, Matthew Navarrette, Angel Villa, Michael Ruiz, Alejandro Montiel, Jessica Jauregui, Nicholas Hardyman Settlement Patterns Central California was a densely populated cultural area with vast amounts of natural resources at hand. Taking advantage of central California’s various ecotones, the people exploited a plethora of resources using their ingenious technological and cultural expertise. As a general rule of thumb, the various tribes of central California organized themselves according to the availability of resources, i.e., if resources were found to be more densely packed within a given tribal area, one could expect to find a direct correlation in the tribe’s settlement pattern. A. Washoe Tribe- Located in the eastern part of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, the Washoe Tribal settlements could typically be found 4-5,000 ft above the resource-rich Carson and Truckee river systems. Utilizing their short distance from the water, the Washoe tribe always had an abundant amount of food due to hunting both the fish swimming in the river, and the large game that came to the water to drink. B. Nisenan Tribe- Much like their Washoe neighbors in the east, the Nisenan Tribe prefered to live above rivers that stemmed from the Sierra Nevada Mountain range (Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers). Despite their similarities to the Washoe, the Nisenan also inhabited the valleys just north of Sacramento. While communities living above rivers tended to small, those located in the central valley could have as many as 500 inhabitants. C. Yana Tribe- While both the Nisenan and Washoe tribes utilized river systems within their tribal areas, the Yana lacked such large rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • California-Nevada Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Valley Nisenan
    W,MO 4R. V Nifv X" T, 4ei WI -N K 7,4 Al Rol P 5", AW wk tx- ".l4Z ,.,A.,Ift A b. lU Tlk wl Z'o "',Ni V- _fYR ..Nk 41 .te f IM 7 x J. x .C- .7 In WW, V, A 7" 4 Zll. 4IN t2 Ph v0:1 VAl"'. PN A '_.,_7, 4A W, "W. ol" IIA M `01C 4- Y'-4!" SI V-4. 'f,:,V.p C uN. A KII V7-1 AVINK "I ZkP`1 -TW 4._ V: 74 tk ll..Il 7N SI, I;p t4. .w -4- WV, pi .MP 41 A % 'W: J 3 N, 2. :1I-. i : ST :or OAWORMiA PLWA;:ATIQ:N .DE., ,-T 1 'O AtTHROPO,O,1 The f6Owig puO 4ealiiig t caogInd oo1 sbcss -nr *idirectionthe of theDatxf etQf oolog ae st In a the- pbl: iations of ls,0d$ for o ldvX gt ral- or- t arcaeo9gky d314 tigy 2 r s ah Is stated' :.opoleyh;ge sdo . be directed .t: I'2*fl E];XQEAG DZARTMENT, UNIVB381, : '1~RART, ' KE CV,'' At 'I;EOCA:.Bi. S. AX Orders 'n& rgttaic shld be. ad4rese d to the UN1VZi*8ITY OP A.O;B ,ORNIA S8;. $-bIctlo31s o thtwoeaUixSveritJio MtoiePrs may1tbe; QbtaIred fromi THB CAM. - :^, PG V3.IXS~~ PEB38, FZEZIW tLANE, LO1NWDON Z.O 4, EXD; to whc ^ ; o/l^erdets oiginating Oreat BritGn edafreland sho'lb;e sent. X3AMt:EIA AZCIHAEQ^O(CY AND HEOG-A i roeber .and Robet . Lie .:03d$rs. Prices,0 Voltut 1, $.5; Volumes -2 :to, 11, incliv, $.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Lake State Recreation Area 7755 Folsom-Auburn Road Folsom, CA 95630 (916) 988-0205
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and Folsom Lake education of the people of California by helping olsom Lake’s to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological F State Recreation Area diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities miles of shoreline and for high-quality outdoor recreation. waterside trails attract millions of boaters, equestrians, cyclists, California State Parks supports equal access. and hikers each year. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (916) 988-0205. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov Folsom Lake State Recreation Area 7755 Folsom-Auburn Road Folsom, CA 95630 (916) 988-0205 © 2008 California State Parks (Rev. 2016) F olsom Lake State willow, redbud, tule, milkweed, sedge grass, Recreation Area offers and native grapevines. PLANTS AND WILDLIFE scenic panoramas After the 1848 gold discovery, most of Blue oaks, interior live of open grasslands, the Nisenan lands were given away as oaks, foothill pines, and rolling hills, the Sierra Spanish land grants. The native people annual grasses dot the Nevada, Sacramento were overwhelmed by the loss of their food open woodlands. In the Valley, and the Bay sources and by diseases like smallpox. The spring, blooming wildflowers Area’s Mount Diablo. Nisenan people were nearly decimated, include Indian paintbrush, Folsom Lake State but today their descendants live in nearby Scenic views larkspur, lupine, brodiaea, fiddleneck, Recreation Area communities or on reservations.
    [Show full text]
  • Story of Water in Sacramento Is Incredibly Complex, and Constantly Evolving
    Sacramento’s Story of Water by Chris Lopez of Grow Water www.GrowWater.org Sacramento lies at the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers, and is the capital city of the state of California. The current population of Sacramento County is around 1.5 million who consume between 110- 270 gallons of water per person per day. Historical rainfall averages between 17 ½ - 19 inches of rain per year, which falls primarily between the months of October through April. This is a stark difference in precipitation when compared to the nearby Sierra foothills, which receive between 30-65 inches of rain per year as well as varying degrees of snowfall, which does not occur at the lower elevations of the Sacramento Valley. The Sacramento River, and its watershed, is California’s most precious resource. “The future of California is joined at the hip with the Sacramento River” says University of California geologist, Dr. Jeff Mount. The Sacramento River has always been a “river of life” and never more so than right now. Located in central northern California, the Sacramento River is the largest river system and basin in the state. The 27,000 square mile watershed includes the eastern slopes of the Coast Ranges, Mount Shasta, and the western slopes of the southernmost region of the Cascades and the northern portion of the Sierra Nevada. The Sacramento River, stretching from the Oregon border to the Bay-Delta, carries 31% of the state’s total runoff water. Primary tributaries to the Sacramento River include the Pit, McCloud, Feather, and American rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Acknowledgement
    Land Acknowledgement The history of the Sacramento area, and the people, is rich in heritage, culture and tradition. This area was, and still is, the Tribal land of the Nisenan people. Sacramento was a gathering place for many local Tribes who have lived throughout the central valley and the foothills for generations and were the original stewards of this land. We would like to acknowledge the Southern Maidu people to the North, the Valley and Plains Miwok/ Me-Wuk Peoples to the south of the American River and we would also like to honor the Patwin Wintun Peoples to the west of the Sacramento River. We acknowledge that we are standing on the tribal lands of Sacramento’s Indigenous people. Why Land Acknowledgement? Today, we recognize that change can only occur in the context of truthfulness, transparency, and reconciliation around systems that have oppressed and excluded Indigenous people. We believe that education can shift historically oppressive practices to build a more inclusive and socially conscious community and society. One of the steps in this process includes asking our partners, supporters and allies to include an Indigenous Peoples land acknowledgement at every opportunity. This statement recognizes that Sacramento is the ancestral homeland of the Nisenan, Maidu, Miwok and Me-Wuk peoples, who are the Indigenous Peoples of this land, and have lived here since time immemorial. What is the purpose of a land acknowledgement? A land acknowledgement is a formal statement, a public recognition, of the Indigenous Peoples who have been dispossessed and displaced from their ancestral homelands and territories due to a variety of colonial and historical reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Collection of I. G. Voznesenski
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: The California Collection of I. G. Voznesenski Author(s): C. Bates Published by: American Indian Art Magazine i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 amer1can1 t inaian ar VOLUME 8 NUMBER 3 SUMMER 1983 magaz1ne TABLE OF CONTENTS Publisher ........... Mary G. Hamilton 17 AUCTION BLOCK Managing Editor .... Roanne Goldfein P. By Harmer Johnson Editorial Consultant ...... Norman Feder Editorial Assistant ......... Ann Davies 20 SUMMER SHOWS Advertising/Circulation .. Carol L. Lovercio 27 MUSEUMS Circulation Assistant ..... Kathryn Larsen I \ 33 Editorial Advisory Board CALIFORNIA COLLECTION OF * . G. VOZNESENSKI REX ARRONSMITH HARMER JOHNSON • Santa Fe. New Mexico New York City LOv\IEU J. BEAN MICHAEL KABOTIE Details some of the materials from present-day California which Calibmia State Unrvei'Sity, Second Mesa, Arizona were collected in 1840 and 1841 by the Russian scientist Ivan Hayward, Califorma ROBERT H. LISTER JAMES T. BIALAC Prescott. Ar1zona Gavrilovich Voznesenski. Presently in the Peter the Great Museum Phoenix.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.11 Cultural Resources
    4.11 CULTURAL RESOURCES This section outlines the regulatory context as it applies to cultural resources and is followed by a cultural context that summarizes the prehistoric, ethnographic and historic-era background of the Planning Area and Study Area. A review of previous investigations and historic archives and known resources is followed by an impact analysis. 4.11.1 REGULATORY SETTING Cultural resources in California are protected by a number of federal, state, and local regulations and ordinances. The following provides a brief outline of the regulations, policies, and ordinances that are applicable to the 2030 General Plan. FEDERAL PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies take into account the effects of their actions, and those they fund or permit, on properties that may be eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to comment on effects to listed or eligible properties. To determine if an undertaking could affect NRHP-listed or eligible properties, all cultural sites that could be affected must be inventoried and evaluated for eligibility to the NRHP. Although compliance with Section 106 is the responsibility of the lead federal agency, others can undertake the work necessary for compliance. The Section 106 process would need to be completed by any federal agency issuing a permit for the proposed project, but it is not specifically required for CEQA compliance, which is discussed below under “State Plans, Policies, Regulations, and Laws.” The Section 106 review process involves a four-step procedure: ► Initiate the Section 106 process by establishing the undertaking, developing a plan for public involvement, and identifying other consulting parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Eligibility
    APPENDIX E Cultural Resource Assessment CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MCKINLEY VILLAGE PROJECT, CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA Prepared by Peak & Associates, Inc. 3941 Park Drive, Suite 20-329 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 (916) 939-2405 Prepared for DUDEK 980 9th Street, 17th Floor Ste. 1750 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 443-8335 June 2013 (Job #13-005) INTRODUCTION The City of Sacramento (“City”), as the Lead Agency under CEQA, for the McKinley Village project, is preparing an EIR that will evaluate potential significant environmental effects of the proposed project. The proposed project consists of development of 328 residential units, a neighborhood recreation center, parks and other public spaces on an approximately 48-acre site located in the City of Sacramento (Figures 1 and 2). The project site is located along the south side of Capital City Freeway north of the Union Pacific rail lines, largely east of Alhambra Boulevard and largely west of Lanatt Street in the northeast area of downtown Sacramento. The Assessor’s Parcel Number is 001-0170-028. Surrounding land uses include the former City of Sacramento 28th Street Landfill to the north (the former landfill site has been designated as a future regional park – Sutter’s Landing Regional Park), and the River Park neighborhood to the east. Land uses to the south and west include the Cannery Business Park and residential neighborhoods in McKinley Park and East Sacramento. The project site is currently vacant and contains a fallow field dominated by non-native grasses and shrubs along with four freestanding billboards and overhead utility lines and poles.
    [Show full text]