DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Strategic Interests and Georgia's Prospects For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Strategic Interests and Georgia's Prospects For Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2015-03 þÿU.S. strategic interests and Georgia s prospects for NATO membership Martel, Albert M. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/45221 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS U.S. STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS FOR NATO MEMBERSHIP by Albert M. Martel March 2015 Thesis Advisor: David S. Yost Second Reader: Mikhail Tsypkin Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2015 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS U.S. STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS FOR NATO MEMBERSHIP 6. AUTHOR(S) Albert M. Martel 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. IRB Protocol number ____N/A____. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) Many observers in NATO and European Union (EU) countries hold that Russia is attempting to challenge the increasing Western influence in Central and Eastern Europe and reassert itself as a regional and global superpower. The 2008 Russia-Georgia conflict and the ongoing crisis in Ukraine provide evidence in support of this theory. Twelve Central and Eastern European nations have nonetheless joined NATO since 1999, and others have pledged their membership aspirations. This fact alone suggests that a general fear of Russian aggression persists among Central and Eastern European nations, and that NATO enlargement is both justified and welcomed. This thesis examines Georgia’s prospects for NATO membership and assesses U.S. strategic interests in this regard. To accomplish this, this thesis analyzes Georgia’s geostrategic importance and investigates links between Georgian and U.S. foreign policies as they relate to NATO enlargement. As regards Georgia, the key questions concern the extent to which the United States supports Tbilisi’s candidacy for Alliance membership, and whether the United States and its NATO Allies are willing to accept the risks and responsibilities that would be incurred with Georgia’s NATO membership. This thesis concludes that U.S. decisions regarding Georgia’s candidacy for NATO membership will be of critical importance. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF Georgia, Tbilisi, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, NATO, NATO enlargement, Partnership for Peace, PfP, PAGES International Partnership Action Plan, IPAP, Annual National Program, ANP, Planning and Review 85 Process, PARP, Membership Action Plan, MAP, NATO-Georgia Commission, NGC, NATO-Russia 16. PRICE CODE Council, 2008 Russia-Georgia Conflict, Rose Revolution, Mikheil Saakashvili, Bidzina Ivanishvili, Giorgi Margvelashvili, Georgian Dream, United National Movement, UNM, Eurasian Transport Corridor, Northern Distribution Network, U.S.-Georgia Charter on Strategic Partnership, Millennium Challenge Account, Freedom Consolidation Act , Georgia Train and Equip Program, GTEP, Sustainment and Stability Operations Program, SSOP, Georgia Deployment Program-ISAF, Georgian Armed Forces, GAF 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited U.S. STRATEGIC INTERESTS AND GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS FOR NATO MEMBERSHIP Albert M. Martel Major, United States Marine Corps B.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2003 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN SECURITY STUDIES (EUROPE AND EURASIA) from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL March 2015 Author: Albert M. Martel Approved by: David S. Yost Thesis Advisor Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader Mohammed M. Hafez Chair, Department of National Security Affairs iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT Many observers in NATO and European Union (EU) countries hold that Russia is attempting to challenge the increasing Western influence in Central and Eastern Europe and reassert itself as a regional and global superpower. The 2008 Russia-Georgia conflict and the ongoing crisis in Ukraine provide evidence in support of this theory. Twelve Central and Eastern European nations have nonetheless joined NATO since 1999, and others have pledged their membership aspirations. This fact alone suggests that a general fear of Russian aggression persists among Central and Eastern European nations, and that NATO enlargement is both justified and welcomed. This thesis examines Georgia’s prospects for NATO membership and assesses U.S. strategic interests in this regard. To accomplish this, this thesis analyzes Georgia’s geostrategic importance and investigates links between Georgian and U.S. foreign policies as they relate to NATO enlargement. As regards Georgia, the key questions concern the extent to which the United States supports Tbilisi’s candidacy for Alliance membership, and whether the United States and its NATO Allies are willing to accept the risks and responsibilities that would be incurred with Georgia’s NATO membership. This thesis concludes that U.S. decisions regarding Georgia’s candidacy for NATO membership will be of critical importance. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS RESEARCH ......................................................1 B. LITERATURE REVIEW ...............................................................................3 C. POTENTIAL EXPLANATIONS AND HYPOTHESES .............................8 D. RESEARCH DESIGN .....................................................................................9 E. THESIS OVERVIEW .....................................................................................9 II. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF GEORGIA .........................................................11 A. DEMOGRAPHY ............................................................................................11 B. ECONOMY ....................................................................................................13 C. ENERGY ........................................................................................................15 D. GEORGIA AND THE WTO ........................................................................16 E. POLITICS ......................................................................................................18 F. MILITARY .....................................................................................................22 III. U.S. STRATEGIC INTERESTS ..............................................................................27 A. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE .........................................................................27 B. SECURITY ASSISTANCE ...........................................................................30 C. GEORGIA’S MILITARY CONTRIBUTIONS ..........................................32 D. U.S.-GEORGIA CHARTER ON STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ...........34 IV. GEORGIA’S PROSPECTS FOR NATO MEMBERSHIP ...................................37 A. 1995 STUDY ON NATO ENLARGEMENT..................................................37 B. GEORGIA’S MOTIVATIONS FOR AND PROGRESS TOWARD POTENTIAL NATO MEMBERSHIP .........................................................39 C. ISSUES HINDERING GEORGIA’S POTENTIAL NATO MEMBERSHIP ..............................................................................................44 1. Georgia’s Unresolved Territorial Disputes in Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali Region/South Ossetia ......................................................45 2. Georgia’s Faltering Democratization and Need for Additional Defense Reforms.................................................................................53 V. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................59 LIST OF REFERENCES ......................................................................................................63 INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST .........................................................................................69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stability, Security, and Sovereignty in the Republic of Georgia
    STABILITY, SECURITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA RAPID RESPONSE CONFLICT PREVENTION ASSESSMENT SPONSORED BY THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS CENTER FOR PREVENTIVE ACTION David L. Phillips Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of the Center for Preventive Action January 15, 2004 Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign on Foreign Relations is an independent, national membership organization and a nonpartisan center for scholars dedicated to producing and disseminating ideas so that individual and corporate members, as well as policymakers, journalists, students, and interested citizens in the United States and other countries, can better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other governments. The Council does this by convening meetings; conducting a wide-ranging Studies program; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal covering international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; maintaining a diverse membership; sponsoring Independent Task Forces; and providing up-to-date information about the world and U.S. foreign policy on the Council’s website, www.cfr.org. THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS. For further information about the Council or this report, please write the Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, or call the Director of Communications at 212-434-9400. Visit our website at www.cfr.org. Copyright © 2004 by the Council on Foreign Relations®, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • Country of Origin Information Report Republic of Georgia 25 November
    REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION (COI) REPORT Country of Origin Information Service 25 November 2010 GEORGIA 25 NOVEMBER 2010 Contents Preface Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................ 1.01 Maps ...................................................................................................................... 1.05 2. ECONOMY ................................................................................................................ 2.01 3. HISTORY .................................................................................................................. 3.01 Post-communist Georgia, 1990-2003.................................................................. 3.02 Political developments, 2003-2007...................................................................... 3.03 Elections of 2008 .................................................................................................. 3.05 Presidential election, January 2008 ................................................................... 3.05 Parliamentary election, May 2008 ...................................................................... 3.06 Armed conflict with Russia, August 2008 .......................................................... 3.09 Developments following the 2008 armed conflict.............................................. 3.10 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Opposition to Soviet Rule (1956-1989) and the Causes of Resentment
    Georgian Opposition to Soviet Rule (1956-1989) and the Causes of Resentment between Georgia and Russia Master‘s Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lisa Anne Goddard Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2011 Master‘s Thesis Committee: Nicholas Breyfogle, Advisor Theodora Dragostinova Irma Murvanishvili Copyright by Lisa Anne Goddard 2011 Abstract This Master‘s thesis seeks to examine the question of strained relations between Georgia and the Russian Federation, paying particular attention to the Georgian revolts of 1956, 1978 and 1989 during the Soviet era. By examining the results of these historical conflicts, one can discern a pattern of three major causes of the tensions between these neighboring peoples: disagreement with Russia over national identity characteristics such as language, disputes over territory, and degradation of symbols of national legacy. It is through conflicts and revolts on the basis of these three factors that Georgian anti- Russian sentiment and Russian anti-Georgian sentiment developed. This thesis is divided into four chapters that will explore the origins and results of each uprising, as well as the evolving conceptions of national identity that served as a backdrop to the conflicts. Following an introduction that lays out the primary questions and findings of the thesis, the second chapter gives a brief history of Georgia and its relationship with Russia, as well as outlines the history and dynamic nature of Georgian national identity. Chapter three, the core chapter, presents the Georgian rebellions during the Soviet era, their causes, and their relevance to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Goldstein Georgian Feast.Indd 1 28/07/18 6:22 PM 1 a TASTE of HISTORY
    PART I AN ABUNDANT LAND michael kenna michael © 2_Goldstein_Georgian Feast.indd 1 28/07/18 6:22 PM 1 A TASTE OF HISTORY Visitors from the kolkhoz celebrating Saint George’s Day at the Alaverdi Monastery near Telavi, 1972. The eleventh-century Alaverdi Monastery was for centuries the tallest church in Georgia. The holiday of Saint George, one of Georgia’s patron saints, is celebrated twice a year, on November 23 and May 6. © Magnum photos / Henri Cartier-Bresson (previous page) Ruins of an old church at Ananuri Fortress, 2008. The village of Ananuri, about an hour north of Tbilisi, once lay along the fabled Silk Road. The dukes of Aragvi built the fortress to protect their domain, which they ruled from the thirteenth to eighteenth centuries. © Michael Kenna 2_Goldstein_Georgian Feast.indd 2 28/07/18 6:22 PM remote as georgia may seem, this small nation once occupied a pivotal place in the world. Georgia was much featured in the mythology of ancient times, chroni- cled by historians and travelers who ventured to the farthest reaches of the known classical world. Stretching from the Black Sea to the Caspian, Georgia lay athwart important East–West trade routes. Through the vagaries of history, Georgia enjoyed independence one thousand years ago, only to be subsumed by the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century. More recently, the republic existed within the borders of the Soviet Union. In 1991, the Soviets’ relaxed hold on their constituent republics allowed the proud and restive Georgians to proclaim independence. With a num- ber of contending political groups, Georgia today fi nds itself in fl ux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Coppieters, Bruno
    www.ssoar.info The Georgian-Abkhaz conflict Coppieters, Bruno Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Coppieters, B. (2004). The Georgian-Abkhaz conflict. JEMIE - Journal on ethnopolitics and minority issues in Europe, 1, 1-29. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-61974 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an. Chapter 5 The Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Bruno Coppieters This chapter analyses the historical background to the secessionist conflict in Abkhazia and the prospect of a settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Framework of Security Sector Governance in Georgia
    DCAF REGIONAL PROGRAMMES The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation established in October 2000 under Swiss law and on THE LEGAL the initiative of the Swiss government. DCAF is one of the world’s leading centres in the FRAMEWORK area of security sector reform (SSR) and security sector governance (SSG). By supporting effective, OF SECURITY SECTOR efficient security sectors that are accountable to the state and its citizens DCAF endeavours to strengthen GOVERNANCE IN security and justice to help prevent violent conflict, build sustainable peace, reinforce the rule of law, and GEORGIA establish a conducive environment for political, so- cial, and economic development. DCAF is firmly committed to a policy of strict neu- trality, impartiality, discreetness, gender sensitivity, and local ownership. The Centre’s Foundation Council, which consists Mindia Vashakmadze of member states, includes 62 governments, as well as four governments and two international organisations that have permanent observer status. DCAF is based in Geneva with permanent offices in Beirut, Brussels, Ljubljana, Ramallah, Tripoli, and Tunis. The Centre has five operational divisions (Southeast Europe, Middle East and North Africa, sub- Saharan Africa & Gender and SSR, Public- Private Partnerships, and the International Security Sector Advisory Team – ISSAT), as well as a research divi- sion. DCAF employs over 130 staff from almost 40 countries. For additional information about DCAF activities in the Caucasus and other areas, please see: http://www.dcaf.ch/Project/Caucasus The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces The Legal Framework of Security Sector Governance in Georgia Mindia Vashakmadze Geneva-Tbilisi, 2014 The publication of this book has been funded by the Directorate for Security Policy (SIPOL) – Swiss Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sports.
    [Show full text]
  • National Report on Georgian Youth
    National Council of Youth Organizations of Georgia NATIONAL REPORT ON GEORGIAN YOUTH TBILISI 2009 1 UDC 061.213-053.81(479.22)+00189+65.012.1 N-323 The National Research on Georgian Youth The National Council of Youth Organizations of Georgia expresses was initiated and organized by the National gratitude to the United Nations Development Programme, Friedrich Eb- Council of Youth Organizations of Georgia ert Stiftung, Tbilisi City Hall, and Civil Institutionalism Development Fund for their financial support. The survey report was prepared by the United Nations Institute for Polling and Marketing Development Programme Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Partner: New Generation – New Initiative Tbilisi City Hall Contributors to the report: Civil Institutionalism Vakhtang Asanidze – Project manager Development Fund George Gamkrelidze Nino Tsulaia The findings presented in this report are the results of the survey and Ketevan Tsutskiridze do not necessarily reflect the official positions of donor organizations. Ekaterine Tsvariani Tamar Kavtaradze Magda Sikorska The report is published by GeoPrint Ltd., 1, Bakhtrioni Str., Tbilisi ISBN 978-9941-0-2357-6 National Council of Youth Organizations of Georgia 2 3 National Report on Georgian Youth Dear Members, Friends and Partners! It is my honor to greet you on behalf of the National Council of Youth Organizations of Georgia. For the past 15 years NCYOG has worked honorably to live up to and respect the principles and values established at its creation. One of the main preoccupations of NCYOG for the past 2 years has been to conduct research into the problems and spheres of interest of Georgian youth. This re- search has been the most extensive attempt so far to collect de- tailed information on Georgian youth and the aim of the research has been to collect the most relevant and detailed data about young people directly from them.
    [Show full text]
  • ©Copyright 2018 Malkhaz Saldadze
    ©Copyright 2018 Malkhaz Saldadze Resources for Crafting Sovereignties in Breakaway Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Politics of Nationhood within the Rivalry between Russia and Georgia Malkhaz Saldadze A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies: Russia, Eastern Europe & Central Asia University of Washington 2018 Committee: Scott Radnitz Glennys Young Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Jackson School of International Studies University of Washington ii Abstract Resources for Crafting Sovereignties in Breakaway Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Politics of Nationhood within the Rivalry between Russia and Georgia Malkhaz Saldadze Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Associate Professor Scott Radnitz Jackson School of International Studies This thesis is aimed at analysis of nation making in Georgia’s breakaway territories engaging certain aspects of foreign and domestic affairs that might be viewed as sources for crafting sovereignties in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. For this purpose, I deal with historiography and collective memory as a source of justification of secession and sovereignty, and relevant political interpretation of these discourses that have mobilizing effects in the respective societies. Demographic changes and politics of ethnic consolidation after the wars for independence in 1990s and Russian-Georgian war in 2008, and their influence on legitimacy of elites of the respective political entities, are also examined in order to gain more understanding of state building in Georgia’s breakaway republics. Russia’s efforts to support nation building in Abkhazia and South Ossetia through financial, human, symbolic-emotional and political investment is one more aspect brought into analysis. Overall goal for studying domestic and international resources of crafting polities in breakaway republics of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is to understand how these post-war iii societies construct their identities, institutions and statehood under influence of the contested geopolitical environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Kartvelians +
    001_021_Georgia_Ch1_Layout 1 30/08/2012 17:46 Page 11 1 The Emergence of the Kartvelians + he origins of the Georgian people(s), their ethno - genesis , like that of most nations, precedes documentary evi dence. T It is a subject where conjecture and wishful thinking have played a greater part than science or logic. One source for conjecture is linguis - tic: the Georgian language carries traces of its contacts and substrata over many centuries, possibly millennia; place names give clues to the lan - guages spoken by previous inhabitants of an area. Archaeology also sheds light on early history, and can be eloquent about culture, about popula tion levels and dates, but it cannot reliably identify the ethnic, let alone the linguistic affiliation of relicts of human activity. Finally, from the second millennium bc we have terse, sparse, but often precise, records in clay and stone of the Assyrian, Hittite and Urartu empires of Anatolia, which list hostile, conquered and vassal neighbours and give material from which the existence of the precursors of today’s Kartvelians (Georgians, Mingrelians, Laz and Svans) can be deduced. From the middle of the first millennium bc , more extensive narrative accounts of the inhabitants of northeast Anatolia and western Georgia (Colchis) are provided by Greek historians and geographers, but the chronology is blurred, as are the lines between observation, legend and rumour. 1 The oldest linguistic evidence lies in the modern Kartvelian lan guages: basic items of vocabulary, such as mk’erdi , chest; k’udi , tail; tbili , warm; zghmart’li , medlar; rka , horn; krcxila , hornbeam; p’iri , face; ekvsi , six; shvi di , seven; trevs , drags, suggest links to an Indo-European dialect with a consonant system reminiscent of the Italo-Celtic group from which Latin derives.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Democracy in Georgia
    35th SESSION Report CG35(2018)18final 7 November 2018 Local and regional democracy in Georgia Monitoring Committee Rapporteurs:1 Michail ANGELOPOULOS, Greece (L, EPP/CCE) Stewart DICKSON, United Kingdom (R, ILDG) Recommendation 426 (2018) ................................................................................................................... 2 Explanatory memorandum ....................................................................................................................... 5 Summary This report follows the third monitoring visit to Georgia since it ratified the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 2004. The report highlights the substantial progress achieved by Georgia in the field of local democracy since the previous Congress monitoring and post-monitoring visits. The rapporteurs positively note the integration of the subsidiarity and commensurability principles and the clause of general competence into the constitution. They also welcome such important measures as the development of a comprehensive reform strategy for decentralisation and modernisation of local government, the introduction of direct election of mayors, strengthening of the financial capacity of local self- government and the constitutional status of the Autonomous Republic of Adjara, the modernisation of the auditing system and the official recognition of the representative position of the National Association of Local Authorities of Georgia (NALAG). However, the rapporteurs express their concerns about difficulties faced by some opposition
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Defence Review
    STRATEGIC DEFENCE Final Report 2007 REVIEW Unclassified The safety and security of the Georgian nation is the highest mission of the government. In order to ensure the security of the nation and at the same time further its integration into the Euro-Atlantic community, we have elaborated and gradually implemented a serious new approach to reviewing, assessing and developing the Georgian Armed Forces. Based on a Presidential decree, a “Strategic Defence Review” (SDR) working group was created in 2004, with the goal of conducting a comprehensive analysis and review of the Georgian Armed Forces and of making recommendations for the long- term development of the nation’s military force structure. In order to assess Georgian Armed Forces combat capabilities, to set up a conceptual background and to create plans for military requirements and structural modifications, an intensive and extensive review was conducted. As a result, “The Interim Report on Strategic Defence Review” was published in May 2006 and the “SDR Final Document” was completed in June 2007 and approved by the Parliament and President in November 2007. The “SDR Final Document” is the first document in Georgian history that thoroughly addresses the current status of the Georgian Armed Forces. It defines the requirements for military capabilities, identifies major capability shortfalls and identifies the means to eliminate the shortfalls. Based on key military and political assumptions, the SDR recommends future Georgian Armed Force structure modifications for the short- (2007-2009), mid- (2010-2012) and long-term (2013-2015) periods. Accordingly, essential conceptual documents such as the “National Military Strategy”, the annual “Minister’s Vision”, the national “Threat Assessment Document”, “Defence Policy Priorities” and other Ministry-level documents were developed based on the results of the Strategic Defence Review.
    [Show full text]