Electronic Retail Effects on Airports and Regional Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electronic Retail Effects on Airports and Regional Development ELECTRONIC RETAIL EFFECTS ON AIRPORTS AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Peter James Hylton In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of City and Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology August 2018 COPYRIGHT © 2018 BY PETER HYLTON ELECTRONIC RETAIL EFFECTS ON AIRPORTS AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Approved by: Dr. Catherine L. Ross, Advisor Dr. Nancey Green Leigh School of City and Regional Planning School of City and Regional Planning Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Subhro Guhathakurta Mr. Michael J. Bednarz School of City and Regional Planning Air Cargo Business Development Georgia Institute of Technology Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Dr. Alan Erera School of Industrial & Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: May 25, 2018 DEDICATION To my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A successful dissertation requires the insights, guidance, support, and feedback of many people. Those who have assisted my studies are far too numerous to thank by name, yet I would nonetheless like to highlight a few. My advisor, Catherine Ross, has tirelessly assisted, encouraged, and advanced my work during my entire graduate studies at Georgia Tech and particularly during the dissertation process. I am very thankful for her support and guidance. I also would like to extend a major thanks to my dissertation committee members: Michael Bednarz, Nancey Green Leigh, Subhro Guhathakurta, and Alan Erera. Their guidance advanced my work far beyond my original expectations. I owe a great deal to the transportation, aviation, and logistics professionals around the country who freely shared their experience and time with me in interviews, surveys, and informal feedback. A larger community helped me complete my studies, including other professors and my comprehensive exam committee members, namely Tim Welch and Atalay Atasu. My colleagues past and present at the Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development (CQGRD) have also made my time at Georgia Tech a joy, including Sarah, Amit, David, Angie, Audrey, Arthi, Tim, Alex, Carey, Elizabeth, Robby, Zan, Anna, Abi, Sigal, Laura, Richard, Pooja, and Fangru. I’m happy to have gotten to know the other PhD students in the School of City and Regional Planning. I cannot wait to see what the future has in store for each of them. For funding my studies, I would like to thank my advisor, Catherine Ross, as well as the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship Program and the Airport Cooperative Research Program’s Graduate Research Award Program. Finally, I thank my family and friends for their endless support. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF TABLES viii LIST OF FIGURES x LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS xiv SUMMARY xv Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Problem Statement 1 1.2 Research Questions 4 1.3 Study Objectives 6 1.4 Expected Contribution to Planning Theory and Practice 8 1.4.1 Transportation Planning 9 1.4.2 Airport Planning 9 1.4.3 Land Use Planning 10 1.4.4 Economic Development Planning 10 CHAPTER 2. Literature Review 12 2.1 Introduction 12 2.2 Regional Development Theory 13 2.3 Geography of Logistics Activity 18 2.4 e-Fulfillment Networks 20 2.5 Determinants of FC Location 24 2.6 Airport Effects on Air Cargo Carrier Networks 29 2.7 Logistics in Airport Planning 32 2.7.1 E-Fulfillment in Airport Planning 32 2.8 Research Gaps 37 2.8.1 No Previous Distinction between e-Fulfillment and B&M Retail in Warehouse Location 39 2.8.2 Extent of Association between Air Connectivity and Logistics Activity 39 2.8.3 State of Airport Planning for e-Fulfillment 40 CHAPTER 3. Conceptual Model 41 3.1 Introduction 41 3.2 Primary Actors in the Conceptual Model 42 3.3 Macro-Scale Conditions 43 3.4 Planning Implications 44 CHAPTER 4. Methodology 52 4.1 Introduction 52 4.2 Analysis 1 – Location Model 53 4.2.1 Select Airports and Airport Regions 53 v 4.2.2 Select Retailers 54 4.2.3 Gather Data 56 4.2.4 Calculate Variables 56 4.2.5 Conduct Regressions 60 4.2.6 Assess Hypotheses 64 4.3 Analysis 2 – Shipper Survey 64 4.3.1 Shipper Survey 65 4.3.2 Logistics Interviews 70 4.4 Analysis 3. Airport Planning Benchmarking 71 4.4.1 Selection of Airports for Document Reviews 72 4.4.2 Selection of Airports for Interviews 76 4.4.3 Analytical Categories 76 CHAPTER 5. Location Model 80 5.1 Introduction 80 5.2 Spatial Analysis 80 5.3 Correlations 83 5.4 Location Models 86 5.4.1 DC Location Models 86 5.4.2 FC Location Models 93 5.5 Conclusions from the Location Models 100 CHAPTER 6. e-Fulfillment Networks 103 6.1 Introduction 103 6.2 Respondents 105 6.3 Results Summary 108 6.4 Detailed Responses 111 6.4.1 Part A: Facility Operations 111 6.4.2 Part B: What Does Your Facility Need from a Region? 114 6.4.3 Part C: Outbound Transportation 123 6.5 Interviews 131 6.5.1 Logistics Strategy 132 6.5.2 Regional Factors 134 6.5.3 Outbound Transportation 139 6.6 Conclusions from the Shipper Surveys and Logistician Interviews 140 CHAPTER 7. Airport Planning Benchmarking 142 7.1 Introduction 142 7.2 Document Review 142 7.2.1 Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) 148 7.2.2 Columbia Metropolitan Airport (CAE) 153 7.2.3 Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT) 160 7.2.4 Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG) 167 7.2.5 Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) 172 7.2.6 John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) 178 7.2.7 Piedmont Triad International Airport (GSO) 184 7.2.8 Rickenbacker International Airport (LCK) 192 vi 7.2.9 Minneapolis – St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 199 7.2.10 Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) 202 7.2.11 Document Review Results 208 7.3 Interviews 210 7.3.1 E-fulfillment Influence 211 7.3.2 Forecasting 215 7.3.3 Investments and Policies 217 7.3.4 Land Development 219 7.4 Conclusions from Airport Planning Benchmarking 219 CHAPTER 8. Integrated Analysis 221 8.1 Introduction 221 8.2 Conceptual Model 221 8.3 Responses to Research Questions 226 8.4 Implications for Regional Development 229 8.4.1 Suitable Regions 229 8.4.2 Growth of E-retail 234 8.4.3 Land Use 239 8.4.4 Employment 242 8.4.5 Surface Transportation 244 8.5 Future Research 244 8.5.1 Do e-retailers’ logistics strategies and networks’ size affect the importance that individual facility managers assign to airports and integrator air hubs? 245 8.5.2 Why do regional expenses influence FC location less than DC location? 246 8.5.3 What strategies should local and state governments employ to attract e- fulfillment activity? 246 8.5.4 Can airport planners induce shippers to participate in planning? 247 8.5.5 Which freight community members should participate in airport planning to adequately understand e-fulfillment? 247 CHAPTER 9. Conclusions 248 9.1 Introduction 248 9.2 Major Results 248 9.3 Policy Recommendations 251 9.3.1 Recommendations for Airport Planners 252 9.3.2 Recommendations for Urban Planners 262 9.3.3 A Way Ahead 267 Appendix A. Shipper Survey 269 Appendix B. Selection of Airports for Document Review 274 References 277 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Factors affecting warehouse location. 27 Table 2 Effects on air connectivity. 31 Table 3 Research gaps. 38 Table 4 Variables in the location model. 57 Table 5 Location model specifications. 62 Table 6 Results of Brown-Forsythe Test. 68 Table 7 Assumptions of non-parametric tests. 70 Table 8 Interview list. 71 Table 9 Airports selected for document review. 75 Table 10 Forecasting approaches' potential sensitivity to e-fulfillment. 78 Table 11 Pearson correlation coefficients among variables in location model. 85 Table 12 Results of DC location Models 1A and 1B. 90 Table 13 Results of FC location Models 2A and 2B. 97 Table 14 Comparison of model results to theoretical predictions. 100 Table 15 Summary of location model results. 101 Table 16 Statistical results. 110 Table 17 Rating descriptions. 143 Table 18 Summary of document reviews (part 1). 145 Table 19 Summary of document reviews (part 2). 146 Table 20 Summary of document reviews (part 3). 147 Table 21 Phenomena considered in LCK’s aggressive growth scenarios. 196 Table 22 Variables to estimate counties' logistics suitability. 230 viii Table 23 Assessment of forecasting approaches for e-retail cargo. 255 Table 24 Selection of candidate airports. 274 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 E-retail growth (annual sales, USA). 2 Figure 2 Dynamics in the relationship between e-fulfillment and airports. 13 Figure 3 Logistics networks for B&M retail (top) and e-retail (bottom). 21 Figure 4 Conceptual framework. 41 Figure 5 Planning implications. 45 Figure 6 Implications for freight planning. 47 Figure 7 Land use model. 48 Figure 8 Implications for airport planning. 50 Figure 9 Implications for economic development planning. 51 Figure 10 Research methodology. 52 Figure 11 Typical characteristics of modern DCs. 55 Figure 12 Document review selection process. 73 Figure 13 Airports for document review. 76 Figure 14 Details of metro areas. 81 Figure 15 Airport regions, FCs, and DCs. 83 Figure 16 OLS assumptions for Model 1A. 91 Figure 17 OLS assumptions for Model 1B. 92 Figure 18 OLS assumptions for Model 2A. 98 Figure 19 OLS assumptions for Model 2B. 99 Figure 20 Survey respondents by retail sector.
Recommended publications
  • Bob Hope Airport
    Bob Hope Airport June January-June --------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ % % REVENUE PASSENGERS 2015 2014 Change 2015 2014 Change ---------------------------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------- Signatory Airlines ----------------------- Alaska Airlines 36,951 32,073 15.21% 200,092 187,921 6.48% US Airways 16,665 16,962 -1.75% 84,430 97,415 -13.33% JetBlue Airways 7,525 8,213 -8.38% 45,941 46,432 -1.06% SeaPort Airlines 1,651 169 876.92% 7,500 1,309 472.96% Southwest Airlines 247,282 246,217 0.43% 1,450,412 1,414,633 2.53% Delta Air Lines 6,507 7,028 -7.41% 36,310 39,398 -7.84% United Airlines 20,397 17,196 18.61% 106,027 102,328 3.61% Other Scheduled Carriers --------------------------- Federal Express 0 0 0 0 United Parcel Service 0 0 0 0 Charter/Contract Carriers ---------------------------- AirNet Express 0 0 0 0 Ameriflight 0 0 0 0 --------------- -------- -------- ---------------- Total Revenue Passengers 336,978 327,858 2.78% 1,930,712 1,889,436 2.18% =========================================================== Deplaned 167,091 163,706 2.07% 962,177 942,511 2.09% Enplaned 169,887 164,152 3.49% 968,535 946,925 2.28% MAIL (lbs.) ----------------- --------------- -------- -------- ---------------- United Parcel Service 136,817 164,968 -17.06% 2,137,615 1,391,816 53.58% --------------- -------- -------- ---------------- Total Mail 136,817 164,968 -17.06% 2,137,615 1,391,816 53.58% =========================================================== Deplaned
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft
    Air s.Pace ELectric Innovative Commuter Aircraft D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study for a 19 PAX Hybrid-Electric Commuter Aircraft Name Function Date Author: Maximilian Spangenberg (ASP) WP2 Co-Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Markus Wellensiek (ASP) WP2 Lead 31.03.2020 Approved by: Dr. Qinyin Zhang (RRD) Project Lead 31.03.2020 D2.1 Economic Feasibility Study page 1 of 81 Clean Sky 2 Grant Agreement No. 864551 © ELICA Consortium No export-controlled data Non-Confidential Air s.Pace Table of contents 1 Executive summary .........................................................................................................................3 2 References ........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................4 2.2 List of figures ................................................................................................................................5 2.3 List of tables .................................................................................................................................6 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................8 4 ELICA market study ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.1 Turboprop and piston engine
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Operations Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Flight
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Flight Ops - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Current Year:10/2002 -09/2003 Prior Year:10/2001 -09/2002 Domestic International % Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Change Operator Total Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 38,855 39,530 26,999 26,191 131,575 3.82% American Airlines Inc 126,736 36,766 36,843 26,609 26,518 14,465 14,454 16 9 28,944 -3.31% Generic Cash and GA 29,935 14,618 14,792 357 168 Account 6,552 6,742 7,502 7,313 28,109 -12.57% Envoy Air Inc 32,152 9,235 9,215 6,844 6,858 4,951 5,038 4,755 4,658 19,402 0.37% Gulfstream International 19,330 5,734 5,627 4,062 3,907 Airlines 4,563 4,607 1,134 1,135 11,439 -13.82% United Airlines, Inc 13,274 4,732 4,800 1,873 1,869 3,985 3,985 918 918 9,806 3.86% Continental Airlines 9,442 3,936 3,936 785 785 4,180 4,180 30 30 8,420 -60.11% US Airways Inc 21,108 10,211 10,211 343 343 1,319 1,386 2,664 2,603 7,972 -9.76% United Parcel Service 8,834 1,413 1,585 3,000 2,836 3,727 3,727 0 0 7,454 0.40% Delta Air Lines Inc 7,424 3,712 3,712 0 0 0 0 3,064 3,065 6,129 6.70% Iberia LAE SA Operadora 5,744 0 0 2,872 2,872 3,043 2,994 14 14 6,065 37.22% Airtran Airways Inc 4,420 2,223 2,197 0 0 0 0 2,443 2,443 4,886 18.36% Bahamasair Holdings Ltd 4,128 0 0 2,077 2,051 2,425 2,429 0 0 4,854 -12.14% Northwest Airlines 5,525 2,467 2,465 296 297 391 344 1,951 1,922 4,608 0.26% Alpha Cargo Airlines dba 4,596 353 352 1,960 1,931 Alpha Cargo 0 0 2,227 2,375 4,602 -7.81% LATAM Airlines Group SA 4,992 0 0 2,427 2,565 14 14 1,821 1,821 3,670 8.26% Amerijet International 3,390 57 57 1,638 1,638 1,603 1,603 214 214 3,634 100.00% Mesa Air dba USAirways 0 0 0 0 0 Express 0 0 1,741 1,741 3,482 -8.46% TACA - Grupo TACA 3,804 0 0 1,900 1,904 0 0 1,722 1,722 3,444 37.54% Tampa Cargo S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sector Update – January 2021
    SEVEN UK AND IRISH SECTORUPDATE AIRPORTS ACHIEVE CARBON NEUTRALITY RVLNEWS Seven British and Irish airports – including RVL Group’s home base East Midlands – have JANUARY ISSUE 11 achieved carbon neutrality, according to the Airport Carbon Accreditation Programme (ACA). The seven are: London Gatwick, London City, Manchester, East Midlands, London Stansted, Farnborough and Dublin. According to the ACA, to achieve ‘Level 3+ Neutrality’ status airports must meet a number of criteria, including determination of emissions sources within the operational boundary of the airport company; calculation of the annual carbon emissions; compilation of a carbon footprint report; provision of evidence of effective carbon management procedures; demonstration of quantified emissions reductions; and offsetting of emissions with RVL ADDS CAPACITY high quality carbon credits. WITH NEW AIRCRAFT Most airports are achieving this RVL Aviation, an RVL Group company, is set to start 2021 in a typically positive by the use of alternative energy, and enthusiastic style with a huge expansion of its cargo capacity. The East Midlands such as creating their own solar farms or using bio-energies. Other Airport based airline has taken delivery of its first Saab 3 0B freighter, as part of - 4 factors include the use of energy- a multi aircraft deal. Each Saab offers roughly four times the cargo volume and - efficient lighting and heating and payload of aircraft in RVL’s existing fleet of Reims-Cessna F406s and King Air QC switching to electric vehicles. cargo aircraft. (Link: UK Aviation News) “Our customers have been asking us for larger aircraft and we are poised to deliver them,” said RVL’s Head of Commercial, David Lacy.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 Edition
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY JULY 2020 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................3 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ............................................................................6 IV. TECHNOLOGY AND EQUIPMENT...........................................................................7 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 8 VI. U.S. CONGRESS.................................................................................................... ...9 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 14 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 15 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 17 X. AMERICAS .............................................................................................................1 9 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Avion Burbank Brochure
    Connect.Create.Innovate. A Proven Team Creative Office & Creative Industrial Retail MATTHEW HARGROVE BENNETT ROBINSON GEOFF MARTIN RYAN BURNETT 818 251 3601 818 907 4608 818 502 6739 818 502 6791 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Lic.#00952137 Lic.#00984312 Lic.#01180819 Lic. #01481691 3 Future Hollywood Burbank Airport Terminal Tulare Ave. N Hollywood Way Property History Lockheed is born A tradition of creative industrial production United Aircraft and Transport Corporation Lockheed, under design lead Kelly Johnson, develops a twin purchases a parcel of 234 acres with surrounding engine, twin-boom interceptor aircraft, the P-38 Lightning steady winds and good drainage, developing 1937 fighter. More than 10,000 units were manufactured during WWII. 1928 United Airport, the largest commercial airport in Los Angeles until the opening of LAX 18 years later. A community of creative innovation A history of design firsts After the attack on Pearl Harbor, a giant camouflaging The Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star, the first effort takes place at Skunk Works to hide the building operational military jet engine plane, is the first of bombers. Artists, set designers, and painters from of many developed on site under the secret Burbank studios (e.g. Disney) successfully cloak military operation “Skunk Works.” At the height of the 1941-1945 production facilities to look like California suburbia. 1943-1989 war days, Lockheed employed more than 90,000 people and ran three shifts (24/7). Inspiring the future of aviation A great chapter of history closes At the “Skunk Works,” Lockheed creates the SR-71, Following its merger with Martin Marietta, Lockheed a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Air's Summer Surge
    Amazon Air’s Summer Surge Strategic Shifts for a Retailing Giant Chaddick Policy Brief by Joseph P. Schwieterman, Jacob Walls and Borja González Morgado September 10, 2020 Our analysis of Amazon Air’s summer operations indicates that the carrier… Added nine planes from May – July, the most it has added over a three-month span in its history Has expanded flight activity 30%+ since April through fleet expansion and improved utilization Adheres to a point-to-point strategy, deemphasizing major huBs even more than last spring Significantly changed service patterns in the Northeast and Florida, creating several mini-hubs Continues to deemphasize international flying while adding lift to Hawaii and Puerto Rico Amazon Air expanded rapidly during summer 2020, a period otherwise marked by sharp year-over-year declines in air-cargo traffic.1 This fully owned subsidiary of retailing giant Amazon made notable moves affecting its strategic trajectory.2 This brief offers an overview of Amazon Air’s evolving orientation between May and late August 2020. The document draws upon publicly available data from a variety of informational sources. Joseph Schwieterman, Ph.D. ñ Data on 1,400 takeoffs and landings of Amazon Air planes from flightaware.com and flightradar24 in April and September 2020. ñ Information on fleet registration from various published sources, including Planespotters.com. ñ Geographic analysis of the proximity of Amazon Air airports to its 340 fulfillment centers. Jacob Walls The results build upon on our May 2020 Brief, showing the dynamic nature of the carrier’s schedules, its differences from air-cargo integrators such as FedEx, its heavy emphasis on cargo-oriented airports with little passenger traffic, and why we believe its fleet could grow to 200 planes by 2028.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Industry Leaders Report 2021: Route to Recovery
    The Aviation Industry Leaders Report 2021: Route to Recovery www.aviationnews-online.com www.kpmg.ie/aviation KPMG REPORT COVERS 2021.indd 1 20/01/2021 14:19 For what’s next in Aviation. Navigating Change. Together. Your Partner For What’s Next KPMG6840_Aviation_Industry_Leaders_Report REPORT COVERS 2021.indd 2021 2 Ads x 4_Jan_2021.indd 4 19/01/202120/01/2021 15:37:29 14:19 CONTENTS 2 List of 10 Regional Review 24 Airline Survivorship 36 Return of the MAX 54 Chapter Four: The Contributors and Post-Covid World Acknowledgements Chapter One Assessing which Boeing’s 737 MAX incorporates a regional airlines will survive the aircraft was cleared for The recovery from 4 Foreword from Joe review of the aviation immediate health crisis return to service after the devastation the O’Mara, Head of market. and the subsequent the US Federal Aviation coronavirus pandemic Aviation, KPMG recovery period has Administration officially has wrought on the 18 Government rescinded the grounding world is expected to be Ireland become an essential Lifelines skill for lessors, lenders order. Industry experts slow but how will the 6 Chapter One: and suppliers. discuss the prospects new world environment This section takes a for the aircraft type and impact demand for air Surviving the Crisis deep dive into the levels 28 Chapter Two: Fleet how it will be financed. travel. This chapter also of government support considers the impact This chapter considers Focus for the aviation industry 44 Chapter Three: The of climate change the macroeconomic and around the world and Airlines are likely to Credit Challenge concerns on the aviation geopolitical shock of the considers its impact emerge from the crisis coronavirus pandemic industry.
    [Show full text]
  • ACI-NA 2018 Taking America Beyond the Horizon – the Economic Impact
    Taking America Beyond the Horizon The Economic Impact of U.S. Commercial Airports in 2017 November 2018 About ACI-NA Airports Council International-North America (ACI-NA) represents local, regional, and state governing bodies that own and operate commercial airports in the United States and Canada. ACI-NA member airports enplane more than 95 percent of the domestic and virtually all the international airline passenger and cargo traffic in North America. Approximately 380 aviation-related businesses are also members of ACI-NA, providing goods and services to airports. Collectively, U.S. airports employ more than 1.3 million people and account for $1.4 trillion in economic activity—or seven percent of the total U.S. workforce and eight percent of GDP. Canadian airports support 405,000 jobs and contribute C$35 billion to Canada’s GDP. Learn more at www.airportscouncil.org. This report was prepared by CDM Smith. 8845 Governor’s Hill Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45249 ©2018 Airports Council International – North America Airports Council International – North America 1615 L Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 202.293.8500 www.airportscouncil.org 2 // Airports Council International – North America America’s Airports Remain Economic Engines for Local Communities Airports are more than runways and terminals. Airports are powerful engines of economic growth and possibility for local communities across the United States. In Taking America Beyond the Horizon: The Economic Impact of Commercial Service Airports in 2017, we are pleased to announce the total economic output of U.S. commercial airports now exceeds $1.4 trillion, supporting more than 11.5 million jobs with a payroll of more than $428 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2012
    international edition october 2012 Boeing predicts wide-body surge SPECIAL SECTION: TIACA Air Cargo Forum © 2012 United Air Lines, Inc. All rights reserved. Wherever you’re going... we’re there. Over 370 destinations throughout the world. And there. And there. And there. The truth is, with more than 150 wide body aircraft, linking 10 hubs and over 370 destinations throughout the world, chances are good that no matter where you’re headed, United Cargo has you covered. For more information, contact your local United Cargo Sales Representative or visit us at unitedcargo.com. Includes destinations served by United Air Lines, Inc. and United Express. JOB#: 12UA018 AD: DC PROOF#: BLUE CLIENT: United Cargo CW: KTG/UC Color Format 4/C process STUDIO#: Vantage TRAFFIC: JW FILE NAME: 12UA018 Air Cargo World MAR12.indd HEADLINE: Wherever you’re going... BLEED: .125 PUBLICATION: Air Cargo World TRIM: 8 x 10.875 PUBDATE: APRIL 2012 SAFETY: 7 x 10 October 2012 Volume 15, Number 9 Editor Jon Ross contents [email protected] • (770) 642-8036 Associate Editor Keri Forsythe [email protected] • (770) 642-8036 Back Pages special correspondent October 1958: “Getting ready for the jet age” Martin Roebuck 24 cOntributing Editors Roger Turney, Ian Putzger Region Focus cOntributing Photographer Geography, infrastructure propel Atlanta cargo Rob Finlayson 28 columnist Brandon Fried production Director Airports Ed Calahan 32 Fueled by cargo circulation Manager Nicola Mitcham [email protected] Special Section Art Director Central Communications
    [Show full text]