DOCSLIB.ORG

160 Million Face

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
160 Million Face Risk Identification at GFDRR The Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery enables solutions to improve the availability of relevant natural disaster risk information. Why Risk Identification Matters Recognizing, assessing, and understanding risk are the Over first steps toward reducing the effects of natural hazards and disasters. Many risk assessments are too technical or too broad to answer the questions that decision makers 160 million face. By developing information for a purpose, sharing it people in 60 countries gained widely, and communicating it well, policymakers and the improved access to risk information public can better understand their disaster risks, prepare through GFDRR-supported national for them, and reduce their effects through planning and and regional geospatial data sharing investment. platforms since 2010. What We Do GFDRR supports the development of risk identification meet specific needs and the goals of stakeholders. tools and methodologies to help government officials, OpenDRI has created a suite of complementary professionals, and communities collaborate on, analyze, programs, including open data platforms, community communicate, and use risk information effectively. mapping and crowdsourcing, and risk visualization and communication. It has also released a number of Facilitating Risk Assessments publications to enable the scalability of these programs. GFDRR is sought after for expertise and advice on disaster risk assessments, risk identification, and related tools. Advancing the Understanding of Risk Its teams have facilitated developing risk information in GFDRR recognized the need for a community of risk more than 60 countries. identification professionals to share knowledge, promote Notably, GFDRR secured access to risk analytics for the best practices, and form nontraditional partnerships. national and sub-national flood and earthquake risk of 32 To meet this need, in 2010 GFDRR established Europe and Central Asia countries. It did so substantially Understanding Risk (UR), which has since become below market rate, with analysis undertaken in less than the preeminent platform for collaboration, knowledge six months. Another example was identifying international sharing, and innovation in identifying and assessing engineering expertise for a school safety project in disaster risk. An open global community, it has grown Armenia. These experts were not only experienced but to over 3,300 members from more than 125 countries also were Armenia expatriates who could fully appreciate representing government agencies, the private sector, the cultural background and were conversant in the multilateral organizations, NGOs, research institutions, local languages – critical for training local engineers. In academia, and civil society. the Africa region, GFDRR is leading the risk assessment UR Forums convene every two years and showcase component of a project in the Indian Ocean Islands, best practices and the latest technical know-how in providing technical assistance to vulnerable countries and disaster risk assessments, providing organizations plans to scale up this to other regions. and individuals an opportunity to highlight new activities and initiatives, build new partnerships, and Advancing Open Data for Resilience foster advances in the field. In 2014, almost 1,000 The Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI) risk assessment experts and practitioners gathered applies the global open data movement concept to the in London for UR’s third forum under the theme, challenge of reducing vulnerability to the impacts of “Producing Actionable Information.” The next forum will natural hazards and climate change. For over four years, be held in Istanbul, Turkey in May 2016. OpenDRI has supported disaster risk management (DRM) teams to build the capacity and long-term ownership of open data projects with countries that are tailored to Europe and Central Asia GFDRR Project: Advancing the DRM Agenda in Europe and Central Asia Partners: World Bank Group, international research institutions Description: GFDRR is facilitating the development of national probabilistic risk profiles for 32 ECA countries as a first step in the process of initiating a dialogue with ministries of finance on prioritizing DRM. These quantitative risk profiles are based on existing global risk models and datasets. Each risk profile contains information Mongolia Albania Kyrgyz Republic on flood and earthquake risk at a provincial level. Turkey China Tunisia Pakistan Nepal Bhutan Dominican Morocco Egypt Haiti Republic India Saudi Arabia Belize Dominica Mali Niger Sudan Lao People's Democratic Republic Republic Bangladesh Guatemala Jamaica Saint Lucia The Gambia of Yemen Vietnam Saint Vincent Eritrea Philippines Federated States Nicaragua Honduras Senegal Nigeria Djibouti Thailand Panama and the Grenadines Cambodia of Micronesia Togo Cameroon Marshall Islands Costa Rica Grenada Sierra Leone Ethiopia Kiribati Guyana Ghana Uganda Palau Liberia Somalia Sri Lanka Ecuador Rwanda Nauru Colombia Burundi Kenya Papua New Guinea Indonesia Tanzania Comoros Tuvalu Samoa Malawi Timor-Leste Brazil Solomon Islands Niue (NZ) Bolivia Madagascar Namibia Vanuatu Fiji Tonga Cook Islands (NZ) Mozambique Lesotho GFDRR Support Sub-Saharan Africa Chile GFDRR Project: Sub-Saharan Africa GFDRR Africa Disaster Risk $500,000 or Less Financing Program Partners: Africa, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) - European Union (EU) $500,000 to $1,000,000 cooperation program, UNISDR, African Development Bank, World Bank Group Description: Under the ACP-EU program, GFDRR is implementing More than $1,000,000 disaster risk financing programs throughout the region. Steps include creating an enabling data environment through OpenDRI programs, implementing demand-driven in-depth risk assessments Risk Identification Engagement1 to be communicated through shorter risk profiles, and disseminating GFDRR Risk Identification Engagement information and capacity building throughout the region. This includes through the Southwest Indian Ocean Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative (SWIO RAFI), which since FY2015 has collected, developed, and shared risk information for five Indian Ocean Islands - Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles, and Zanzibar - to improve understanding and availability of disaster risk financing solutions, such as insurance or contingent credit. Risk Identification Supports Work Across GFDRR’s Pillars Pillar 1 – Pillar 2 – Pillar 3 – Pillar 4 – Pillar 5 – Risk Identification: Risk Reduction: Preparedness: Financial Protection: Resilient Recovery: People in vulnerable Risk identification Hazard and risk Risk information is Risk identification can countries will have supports decision information enables a critical component improve post-disaster improved access to makers in vulnerable decision makers to in the development reconstruction and information about countries to avoid understand potential of robust financial recovery efforts by disaster and climate creating new risks disaster impacts protection strategies. rapidly assessing risks, and greater and to reduce current through dynamic damage and providing capacity to create, risks through smart scenario analysis. information to guide manage, and use this investments. resilient recovery. 2 information. Sri Lanka GFDRR Project: Strengthening Capacity to Mainstream Disaster Risk Management in Sri Lanka Partners: World Bank Group, Sri Lanka’s Ministry of Disaster Risk Management Description: As one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world, Sri Lanka is undertaking a series of risk assessments in eastern cities. At risk of tsunamis, floods Snapshot: Leveraging in Practice Mongolia and cyclones, these cities will incorporate disaster risk Albania Kyrgyz Republic Turkey analysis into their planned urban development programs. > Indonesia: Officials in Jakarta wanted to create Further, this project established a data sharing platform flood risk contingency plans, but lacked data. In Tunisia China for the Sri Lankan government, which has recently been 2011, the Indonesian government, working with Pakistan launched as the RiskInfo GeoNode. Nepal Bhutan the Australian government and GFDRR, partnered Dominican Morocco Egypt with the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team Haiti Republic India Saudi Arabia to train over 500 Indonesians through local Belize Dominica Mali Niger Sudan Lao People's Democratic Republic Republic Bangladesh governments, civil society organizations, and Guatemala Jamaica Saint Lucia The Gambia of Yemen Vietnam Saint Vincent Eritrea Philippines Federated States universities. Together, they mapped over 250,000 Nicaragua Honduras Senegal Nigeria Djibouti Thailand Panama and the Grenadines Cambodia of Micronesia buildings. Indonesia’s geospatial information Togo Cameroon Marshall Islands Costa Rica Grenada Sierra Leone Ethiopia agency and academic experts at Gadjah Mada Kiribati Guyana Ghana Uganda Palau Liberia Somalia Sri Lanka University have helped scale up the program, Ecuador Rwanda Nauru Colombia Burundi Kenya Papua New Guinea mapping over one million buildings to date. Indonesia Tanzania Comoros Tuvalu Samoa Malawi Timor-Leste Building on this, GFDRR, the Indonesian Brazil Solomon Islands Niue (NZ) Bolivia Madagascar government, the Australia-Indonesia Facility Namibia Vanuatu Fiji for Disaster Reduction, the East Asia AusAID Tonga Cook Islands (NZ) Mozambique Infrastructure for Growth Trust Fund, and the Lesotho The Philippines World Bank partnered to create the Indonesian GFDRR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons from the 2015 Nepal Earthquake Housing
    LESSONS FROM THE 2015 NEPAL EARTHQUAKE 4 HOUSING RECOVERY Maggie Stephenson April 2020 We build strength, stability, self-reliance through shelter. PAGE 1 Front cover photograph Volunteer Upinder Maharsin (red shirt) helps to safely remove rubble in Harisiddhi village in the Lalitpur district. Usable bricks and wood were salvaged for reconstruction later, May 2015. © Habitat for Humanity International/Ezra Millstein. Back cover photograph Sankhu senior resident in front of his house, formerly three stories, reduced by the earthquake to one-story, with temporary CGI roof. November 2019. © Maggie Stephenson. All photos in this report © Maggie Stephenson except where noted otherwise. PAGE 2 FOREWORD Working in a disaster-prone region brings challenges emerging lessons that offer insights and guidance for and opportunities. Five years after Nepal was hit by future disaster responses for governments and various devastating earthquakes in April 2015, tens of thou- stakeholders. Key questions are also raised to help sands of families are still struggling to rebuild their frame further discussions. homes. Buildings of historical and cultural significance Around the world, 1.6 billion people are living without that bore the brunt of the disaster could not be re- adequate shelter and many of them are right here in stored. Nepal. The housing crisis is getting worse due to the While challenges abound, opportunities have also global pandemic’s health and economic fallouts. Be- opened up, enabling organizations such as Habitat cause of Habitat’s vision, we must increase our efforts for Humanity to help affected families to build back to build a more secure future through housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarica Il Rapporto 2015
    lo stato della popolazione nel mondo 2015 lo stato lo stato della popolazione nel mondo 2015 AL RIPARO DALLA TEMPESTA: U TEMPESTA: DALLA AL RIPARO N agenda Costruire un mondo ’ in cui ogni gravidanza sia desiderata ogni parto innovativa sicuro e le potenzialità PER di ogni giovane siano realizzate DONNE E raga zz E , AL RIPARO IN UN MONDO DALLA IN continua TEMPESTA emergen Un’agenda innovativa per donne e ragazze, in un mondo Fondo delle Nazioni Unite z A per la popolazione Associazione italiana donne in continua emergenza 605 Third Avenue per lo sviluppo New York, NY 10158 USA Via dei Giubbonari 30 00186 - Roma Tel. +1-212 297-5000 tel. +39 06 687 3214/196 www.unfpa.org [email protected] ©Unfpa 2015 www.aidos.it Stampato su carta ecologica Lo Stato della popolazione nel mondo 2015 GLOSSARIO DEI TERMINI UMANITARI Ricercatrice principale Redazione Therese McGinn Caporedattore: Richard Kollodge Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman Redattrice associata e responsabile versione digitale: Katheline Ruiz AZIONE UMANITARIA DIRITTI UMANI motivi di etnia, religione, nazionalità, School of Public Health, Columbia University appartenenza a un determinato gruppo Sviluppatore digitale: Hanno Ranck L'azione umanitaria fornisce servizi Tutti i diritti umani si fondano sulla sociale o opinioni politiche, e che non Ricercatori E autori Progettazione e produzione della versione stampa e web salva vita e facilita il ritorno alla dignità e il valore propri di ogni essere può o non vuole, a causa di tale timore, Jacqueline Bhabha interattiva Prographics, Inc. normalità di persone e comunità umano. Il concetto di diritto umano Harvard T.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation Following Natural Disasters: Three Important Lessons from the 2015 Earthquake in Nepal
    Physiotherapy Practice and Research 37 (2016) 69–72 69 DOI 10.3233/PPR-160075 IOS Press Invited Commentary Rehabilitation following natural disasters: Three important lessons from the 2015 earthquake in Nepal Michel D. Landrya,∗, Edwin C. Salvadorb, Phillip S. Sheppardc and Sudha R. Ramand aPhysical Therapy Division, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA bPublic Health Administrator, World Health Organization (WHO), Dhaka, Bangladesh cInternational Organization for Migration (IOM), Chautara, Sindhupalchok, Nepal dDuke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), Duke University, Durham, NC, USA Abstract. On April 25, 2015, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake occurred in Nepal; then on the afternoon of May 12, 2015, the small Himalayan nation experienced a second 7.3 magnitude earthquake. As of the writing of this commentary, the estimate of casualties has surpassed 8,500 making it the deadliest natural disaster in Nepal over the past 80 years. Technological advances in emergency medicine and emergency preparedness have increased the likelihood of surviving a disaster. The result, however, is that populations often survive with complex disabilities that the health infrastructure struggles to accommodate in the early post- disaster period. Nepal had a relatively poor infrastructure for people with disabilities before the earthquake, and the health system will now will be challenged to meet their needs into the future. In this commentary, we argue that there were at least three main lessons learned for the rehabilitation sector following the 2015 earthquake. First, rehabilitation can facilitate earlier discharge from hospitals thereby improving the overall institutional capacity to treat a higher number of patients; second, rehabilitation can prevent secondary musculoskeletal, integumentary and pulmonary complications; and third, rehabilitation improves function so that individuals can have better access to other essential post-disaster services.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Edition: Disaster Risk Reduction: a Road of Opportunities
    Youth Science-Policy Interface Publication Special Edition Source: Nasa Earth Observation isk DISASTEDISASTEReduction a road of opportunities isk DISASTEReduction a road of opportunities Launched at the UNISDR Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction Conference, Cancun, Mexico. May, 2017 Suggested Citation UNMGCY Youth Science Policy Interface Publication – Special Edition: Disaster Risk Reduction: A Road of Opportunities. May, 2017. Content Disclaimer 4 Executive Summary 5 Disaster reduction & disaster preparedness >Anthropocentric principles for effective early warning systems 8 >Communicating risk information and early warnings: bridging the gap between science and practice 13 >Community preparedness on undetonated explosive remnants of war Kenya 24 >Developing and implementing effective (multi-hazard) early warning systems: the vital role of young professionals 32 >Disaster risk during flood situations in the dry zone of Sri Lanka 37 >Redefining disaster (excerpts from a thesis at Kanagawa University in Japan) 42 >Reducing disaster risks by better prediction of the impacts of El Niño and La Niña 48 > Role of Nepali nurses in disaster risk reduction: a need for capacity building 52 > Staying safe: disaster risk reduction 56 Science, technology & innovation >Digital government for better disaster risk governance? added value and challenges 57 >Two-dimensional Mudflood Simulation in Arequipa, Peru 64 >Synthetic biology and its effects on environment and human health 68 Disaster resilience >Incremental Shelters for Refugees and Host
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2015 Report to Congress
    PROPOSED REFUGEE ADMISSIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 REPORT TO THE CONGRESS SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE COMMITTEES ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE AND UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 207(d)(1) and (e) OF THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INTRODUCTION This Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2015: Report to the Congress is submitted in compliance with Sections 207(d)(1) and (e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The Act requires that before the start of the fiscal year and, to the extent possible, at least two weeks prior to consultations on refugee admissions, members of the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives be provided with the following information: (1) A description of the nature of the refugee situation; (2) A description of the number and allocation of the refugees to be admitted and an analysis of conditions within the countries from which they came; (3) A description of the plans for their movement and resettlement and the estimated cost of their movement and resettlement; (4) An analysis of the anticipated social, economic, and demographic impact of their admission to the United States; 1 (5) A description of the extent to which other countries will admit and assist in the resettlement of such refugees; (6) An analysis of the impact of the participation of the United States in the resettlement of such refugees on the foreign policy interests of the United States; and (7) Such additional information as may be appropriate or requested by such members.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management of Earthquake Risk
    Financial Management of Earthquake Risk Please cite this publication as: OECD (2018), Financial Management of Earthquake Risk, www.oecd.org/finance/Financial-Management-of-Earthquake-Risk.htm. This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries or those of the European Union. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. © OECD 2018 FOREWORD │ 5 Foreword Disasters present a broad range of human, social, financial, economic and environmental impacts, with potentially long-lasting, multi-generational effects. The financial management of these impacts is a key challenge for individuals, businesses and governments in developed and developing countries. The Financial Management of Earthquake Risk applies the lessons from the OECD’s analysis of disaster risk financing practices and the application of its guidance to the specific case of earthquakes. The report provides an overview of the approaches that economies facing various levels of earthquake risk and economic development have taken to managing the financial impacts of earthquakes. The OECD supports the development of strategies and the implementation of effective approaches for the financial management of natural and man-made disaster risks under the guidance of the OECD High-Level Advisory Board on Financial Management of Catastrophic Risks and the OECD Insurance and Private Pensions Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ANALYZING SEISMIC ACTIVITIES DURING 1900 TO
    Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering E-ISSN: 1982-3932 [email protected] Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Kumar, Amit; Chandra Pandey, Arvind ANALYZING SEISMIC ACTIVITIES DURING 1900 TO 2015 TO ASSESS URBAN RISK IN NEPAL HIMALAYAS USING GEOINFORMATICS Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, vol. 11, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, 2017, pp. 133-141 Universidade Federal da Paraíba Paraíba, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=283255970001 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Kumar and Pandey 133 Journal of Urban and Environmental Journal of Urban and E Engineering, v.11, n.2, p.133-141 Environmental Engineering ISSN 1982-3932 J www.journal-uee.org E doi: 10.4090/juee.2017.v11n2.133141 U ANALYZING SEISMIC ACTIVITIES DURING 1900 TO 2015 TO ASSESS URBAN RISK IN NEPAL HIMALAYAS USING GEOINFORMATICS Amit Kumar and Arvind Chandra Pandey Centre for Land Resource Management, Central University of Jharkhand, Brambe, Ranchi-835205, INDIA Received 27 August 2016; received in revised form 02 May 2017; accepted 05 July 2017 Abstract: A high magnitude (Mw = 7.8) earthquake caused a geological disaster recently on April-May 2015 in Nepal Himalayas and resulted in severe devastation in Nepal as well as neighboring states in India. Looking into its recurrent occurrence with varied intensity, in the present study, the earthquake pattern in Nepal Himalayas was analyzed during the period 1900 to 2015 using United States Geological Survey (USGS) data sources in GIS environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rupture Process of the Mw=7.9 2015 Gorkha Earthquake (Nepal)
    Rupture process of the Mw=7.9 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal): insights into Himalayan megathrust segmentation Raphaël Grandin, Martin Vallée, Claudio Satriano, Robin Lacassin, Yann Klinger, Martine Simoes, Laurent Bollinger To cite this version: Raphaël Grandin, Martin Vallée, Claudio Satriano, Robin Lacassin, Yann Klinger, et al.. Rupture process of the Mw=7.9 2015 Gorkha earthquake (Nepal): insights into Himalayan megathrust seg- mentation. Geophysical Research Letters, American Geophysical Union, 2015, 42 (20), pp.8373-8382. 10.1002/2015GL066044. hal-01214961v2 HAL Id: hal-01214961 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01214961v2 Submitted on 24 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Rupture process of the Mw =7.9 2015 Gorkha 10.1002/2015GL066044 earthquake (Nepal): Insights into Himalayan Key Points: megathrust segmentation • Uniform rupture velocity during peak moment release explains modest Raphaël Grandin1, Martin Vallée1, Claudio Satriano1, Robin Lacassin1,
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Report
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE APRIL 11, 2017 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Alan Cooperman, Director of Religion Research Katayoun Kishi, Research Associate Anna Schiller, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, April 11, 2017, “Global Restrictions on Religion Rise Modestly in 2015, Reversing Downward Trend” 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. This report was produced by Pew Research Center as part of the Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures project, which analyzes religious change and its impact on societies around the world. Funding for the Global Religious Futures project comes from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the John Templeton Foundation. © Pew Research Center 2018 www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Acknowledgments This report was produced by Pew Research Center as part of the Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures project, which analyzes religious change and its impact on societies around the world. Funding for the Global Religious Futures project comes from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the John Templeton Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • INCB Annual Report for 2016
    INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD REPORT REPORT 2016 INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL BOARD CONTROL NARCOTICS INTERNATIONAL Report 2016 EMBARGO Observe release date: Not to be published or broadcast before Thursday, 2 March 2017, at 1100 hours (CET) UNITED NATIONS CAUTION Reports published by the International Narcotics Control Board in 2016 TheReport of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2016 (E/INCB/2016/1) is supple- mented by the following reports: Narcotic Drugs: Estimated World Requirements for 2017—Statistics for 2015 (E/INCB/2016/2) Psychotropic Substances: Statistics for 2015—Assessments of Annual Medical and Scientific Requirements for Substances in Schedules II, III and IV of the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 (E/INCB/2016/3) Precursors and Chemicals Frequently Used in the Illicit Manufacture of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances: Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 2016 on the Implementation of Article 12 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988 (E/INCB/2016/4) The updated lists of substances under international control, comprising narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and substances frequently used in the illicit manufacture of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, are contained in the latest editions of the annexes to the statistical forms (“Yellow List”, “Green List” and “Red List”), which are also issued by the Board. Contacting the International Narcotics Control Board The secretariat of the Board may be reached at the following address: Vienna International Centre Room E-1339 P.O. Box 500 1400 Vienna Austria In addition, the following may be used to contact the secretariat: Telephone: (+43-1) 26060 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5867 or 26060-5868 E-mail: [email protected] The text of the present report is also available on the website of the Board (www.incb.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Damage to Cultural Heritage Structures and Buildings Due to the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake
    Journal of Earthquake Engineering ISSN: 1363-2469 (Print) 1559-808X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ueqe20 Damage to Cultural Heritage Structures and Buildings Due to the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake Satish Bhagat, H. A. D. Samith Buddika, Rohit Kumar Adhikari, Anuja Shrestha, Sanjeema Bajracharya, Rejina Joshi, Jenisha Singh, Rajali Maharjan & Anil C. Wijeyewickrema To cite this article: Satish Bhagat, H. A. D. Samith Buddika, Rohit Kumar Adhikari, Anuja Shrestha, Sanjeema Bajracharya, Rejina Joshi, Jenisha Singh, Rajali Maharjan & Anil C. Wijeyewickrema (2018) Damage to Cultural Heritage Structures and Buildings Due to the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22:10, 1861-1880, DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1309608 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309608 Published online: 23 Jun 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 265 View Crossmark data Citing articles: 2 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ueqe20 JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING 2018, VOL. 22, NO. 10, 1861–1880 https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1309608 Damage to Cultural Heritage Structures and Buildings Due to the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake Satish Bhagata, H. A. D. Samith Buddikaa, Rohit Kumar Adhikaria, Anuja Shresthaa, Sanjeema Bajracharyaa, Rejina Joshia, Jenisha Singha, Rajali Maharjanb, and Anil C. Wijeyewickremaa aDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan; bDepartment of International Development Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Cultural heritage structures are an integral facet of the irreplaceable Received 10 February 2017 cultural heritage of a nation and have been constructed several hun- Accepted 27 February 2017 fi dreds and even thousands of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015-16
    lR;esot;rs ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 Towards a New Dawn MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT Government of India CONTENTS Page No. Chapter 1. Introduction 1-4 Chapter 2. Women Empowerment and Protection 5-18 Chapter 3. Child Development 19-40 Chapter 4. Child Protection and Welfare 41-56 Chapter 5. Gender Budgeting 57-64 Chapter 6 Plan Statistics Research and Other Activities 65-76 Chapter 7. Food and Nutrition Board 77-86 Chapter 8. National Institute of Public Cooperation 87-96 and Child Development Chapter 9. Central Social Welfare Board 97-102 Chapter 10. National Commission for Women 103-114 Chapter 11. Rashtriya Mahila Kosh 115-122 Chapter 12. National Commission for Protection of 123-134 Child Rights Chapter 13. Central Adoption Resource Authority 135-142 Annexures 143 1 Introduction Towards a New Dawn Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 The Ministry of Women and Child Mission - Children Development, Government of India, came into existence as a separate Ministry with effect 1.4 Ensuring development, care and protection of from 30th January, 2006. It has the nodal children through cross-cutting policies and responsibility to advance the rights and programmes, spreading awareness about their rights concerns of women and children who together and facilitating access to learning, nutrition, constitute 67.7% of the country's population, as institutional and legislative support for enabling them to grow and develop to their full potential. per 2011 Census. The Ministry was constituted with the prime intention of addressing gaps in Constitutional and Legal Provisions State action for women and children and for promoting inter-Ministerial and inter-sectoral 1.5 The concern of the makers of our Constitution convergence to create gender equitable and for equality to women on the one side and for child-centred legislation, policies and assuring the rights of children, promoting their programmes.
    [Show full text]