Threatenedwildli00unit.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Threatenedwildli00unit.Pdf 88 038 THREATENED WILDLIFE OF THE UNITED STATES Q32 Compiled by Office of Endangered Species and International Activities Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife U.S. Department of the Interior RESOURCE PUBLICATION 114. March 1973 (Revised Resource Publication 34) Published by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Printed at the U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., March 1973 For sale by the Superintendent ot Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 THREATENED WILDLIFE OF THE UNITED STATES Introduction General This publication presents data on the status of species or subspecies of vertebrates whose existence is threatened in the United States, the District of Columbia, Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Information is not yet available for American Samoa and Guam. Two previous editions of this publication, entitled Rare and Endangered Fish and this edition the Wildlife of the United States , differ from third by substituting designation, "threatened," for the designation, "rare," or "endangered," in the data pages. This change was made primarily to emphasize that the animals covered by data pages in this publication do not comprise the official list of "Endangered" species. The latter is found in the U.S. Department of the Interior's list of endangered native fish and wildlife, published in the Federal Register . As did previous editions, this edition summarizes our knowledge of the status of native vertebrates. It is intended to be a reference for compiling the official List of Endangered Native Fish and Wildlife, as a means to stimulate interest, to impart know- ledge, and to solicit information about threatened wildlife. It is likely that all pertinent data are not included, and anyone who has additional information is encouraged to contact the Office of Endangered Species, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, see Appendix A. Only those animals determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be threatened with extinction and named on the list which is published and amended periodically in the the Federal Register , are eligible for the benefits provided by Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 (16 U.S.C. 668aa) . Appendix C of this publication contains the list as of the press date of this publication. Only threatened vertebrates are included in this publication; mollusks and crustaceans will be included in future editions. Within each of the five major Classes of vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals), families, genera and species are arranged in phylogenetic order. This means that the most primitive or generalized forms are considered first, followed by increasingly more advanced or complex types within each Class. This type of arrangement is recognized by scientists throughout the world. In addition to the Federal program for endangered native fish and wildlife, many states are adopting programs designed to prevent the extirpation of native wildlife found within their borders . Information on animals considered endangered within the states may be obtained, where available, by writing the appropriate state conservation agencies. Addresses of those agencies are listed in Appendix B . A State-by-State listing of species endangered nationwide is also included. Acknowledgments This publication is the result of a great deal of cooperation and effort by many persons and agencies. Clinton H. Lostetter, Rare and Endangered Species Coordinator, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Portland, Oregon, coordinated the updating of the data pages. Dr. John W. Aldrich, Staff Specialist with the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, assisted with the bird and mammal sheets. Dr. James A. Peters, (deceased) formerly of the Smithsonian 111 Institution's Division of Reptiles carried much of the burden of assembling the reptile and . of Fishes of amphibian sections Dr. Robert R. Miller, Curator , Museum Zoology , University of Michigan, Dr. Edward C. Kinney, and Mr. Stephen H. Taub of the Division of Fishery Services, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, were largely responsible for the section on fishes. Howard R. Leach, Wildlife Management Branch, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, and others of that agency reviewed and constructively commented on the data pages pertaining to California. Data were gleaned from the published and unpublished work of many other scientists and agencies which are too numerous to be acknowledged individually. Federal Acts Perhaps more confusion exists about the kind of protection an endangered species receives than about any other aspect of the program . Neither the Endangered Species Protection Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 926) nor its amended version, the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969, provides a Federal prohibition against the taking or possession of native endangered fish and wildlife. Federal protection is afforded to migratory birds through the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703-711); to eagles through the Bald Eagle Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 668-668d): and to marine mammals through the Marine Mammal Protection Act (P.L. 92-522). Resident wildlife such as quail and pheasants, terrestrial mammals, fishes, amphibians and reptiles may be under State jurisdiction but do not have Federal protection except as provided on some Federal lands. Under the Lacey Act, as amended (18 U.S.C. 42-44) the Federal Government can become involved if an animal (endangered or not) is taken in violation of State law, and then moved across State or international boundaries . Formal involvement by the Federal Government in endangered species conservation began with the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966. That law acknowledged a national responsibility to act on behalf of native species of wildlife which were "threatened with " extinction. It required the Secretary of the Interior to judge what was endangered and publish in the Federal Register lists of such animals by scientific and common name. He then was authorized to: 1. Conduct research on such animals. 2. Use limited amounts of money ($750,000 per area, $2.5 million per year for a total of $15 million) from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to acquire habitat for them. The Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 was signed into law on December 5, 1969. This amendment to the 1966 Act broadened the scope of the effort to conserve endangered species. Among other things it: 1. Broadened the coverage of the Act to include all vertebrates, mollusks and crustaceans . 2. Permitted the consideration of subspecies as well as species (a subspecies is a recognizable race or variant within a species) . IV 3. Authorized the acquisition of water as well as land for endangered species. 4. Increased the amounts available from the Land and Water Conservation Fund to $2.5 million per area and $5 million per year. The $15 million overall ceiling was retained. 5. Provided significant authority for the conservation of endangered foreign available from wildlife . Further details on this aspect of the program are the Office of Endangered Species of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife . Criteria for Determining an "endangered species" Confusion still exists among laymen and scientist alike as to what constitutes an endangered species. As noted above, the list of animals published and periodically revised in the Federal Register is the United States Government's "official" list of endangered species and identifies those animals which are eligible for Federal benefits afforded an endangered species . The Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 does not set forth specific criteria for determining which species are "threatened with extinction." Instead, it directs the Secretary of the Interior to seek the council of specialists and agencies with expertise on the subject, and to rely upon their combined judgment. The wording of the Act is as follows: "(C) A species of native fish and wildlife shall be regarded as threatened with extinction whenever the Secretary of the Interior finds, after consultation with the affected States, that its existence is endangered because its habitat is threatened with destruction, drastic modification, or severe curtailment, or because of overexploitation, disease, predation, or because of other factors, and that its survival requires assistance. In addition to consulting with the States, the Secretary shall, from time to time, seek the advice and recommendations of interested persons and organizations, including, but not limited to, ornithologists, . He shall ichthyologists, ecologists, herpetologists , and mammalogists publish in the Federal Register the names of the species of native fish and wildlife found to be threatened with extinction in accordance with this paragraph." Thus, actual numbers of an animal is only one criterion used to determine whether or not " it is "threatened with extinction . Critically low or declining populations may be sufficient or to be but some which still reason for determining—a species subspecies endangered, exist in large numbers such as the brown pelican, the sperm whale, or the Arctic peregrine falcon--may face serious threats such as environmental degradation, over- about their in the foreseeable future. When exploitation, etc. , that could bring extirpation their continued existence is in peril, they may legitimately be considered as endangered species under the Act. The earlier versions of this publication mentioned a "Rare and Endangered Species
Recommended publications
  • A Thesis Entitled Molecular, Morphological, and Biogeographic Resolution of Cryptic Taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma Blen
    A Thesis Entitled Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic resolution of cryptic taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides complex By Amanda E. Haponski Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Science Degree in Biology (Ecology-track) ____________________________ Advisor: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Timothy G. Fisher ____________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Johan F. Gottgens ____________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2007 Copyright © 2007 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic resolution of cryptic taxa in the Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides complex Amanda E. Haponski Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Master of Science Degree in Biology (Ecology-track) The University of Toledo December 2007 DNA sequencing has led to the resolution of many cryptic taxa, which are especially prevalent in the North American darter fishes (Family Percidae). The Greenside Darter Etheostoma blennioides commonly occurs in the lower Great Lakes region, where two putative subspecies, the eastern “Allegheny” type E. b. blennioides and the western “Prairie” type E. b. pholidotum , overlap. The objective of this study was to test the systematic identity and genetic divergence distinguishing the two subspecies in areas of sympatry and allopatry in comparison to other subspecies and close relatives. DNA sequences from the mtDNA cytochrome b gene and control region and the nuclear S7 intron 1 comprising a total of 1,497 bp were compared from 294 individuals across 18 locations, including the Lake Erie basin and the Allegheny, Meramec, Obey, Ohio, Rockcastle, Susquehanna, and Wabash River systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Alabama Calibration of The
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEMS INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM CALIBRATION OF THE INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY FOR THE SOUTHERN PLAINS ICHTHYOREGION IN ALABAMA OPEN-FILE REPORT 1210 by Patrick E. O'Neil and Thomas E. Shepard Prepared in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................ 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Acknowledgments .................................................... 6 Objectives........................................................... 7 Study area .......................................................... 7 Southern Plains ichthyoregion ...................................... 7 Methods ............................................................ 9 IBI sample collection ............................................. 9 Habitat measures............................................... 11 Habitat metrics ........................................... 12 The human disturbance gradient ................................... 16 IBI metrics and scoring criteria..................................... 20 Designation of guilds....................................... 21 Results and discussion................................................ 23 Sampling sites and collection results . 23 Selection and scoring of Southern Plains IBI metrics . 48 Metrics selected for the
    [Show full text]
  • From Foraging to Food Production on the Southern Cumberland Plateau of Alabama and Tennessee, U.S.A
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2014 From Foraging to Food Production on the Southern Cumberland Plateau of Alabama and Tennessee, U.S.A. Stephen Byrnes Carmody University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Carmody, Stephen Byrnes, "From Foraging to Food Production on the Southern Cumberland Plateau of Alabama and Tennessee, U.S.A.. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3189 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Stephen Byrnes Carmody entitled "From Foraging to Food Production on the Southern Cumberland Plateau of Alabama and Tennessee, U.S.A.." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Jan F. Simek, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: David G. Anderson, Kandace D. Hollenbach, Sally P. Horn, Gary D. Crites Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) From Foraging to Food Production on the Southern Cumberland Plateau of Alabama and Tennessee, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • H Ist O Ry in T H E M a K in G
    Profiles in Excellence gives recognition to the scholarly accomplishments of our faculty. Broadly defined those accomplishments include artistic endeavors, creative initiatives, original research, scholarly books, articles and presentations, funded grants, and/or academic services. These efforts augment scholarship at the University but also enhance the integral relationship between teaching and research. They are often an extension of research collaboration with our students and with colleagues at other institutions. The publication of Profiles in Excellence affords an opportunity for the University to acknowledge the dedication and professionalism of the University of North Alabama faculty. The accomplishments reported herein are but a small part of the numerous examples of hard work contributed by the faculty on behalf of the numerous constituencies served by the University. The mission of the University of North Alabama is broad based but gives special attention to the creation of an environment of discovery and creative accomplishment. Profiles in Excellence embraces that mission. To all who contribute on its behalf, thank you. Dr. John Thornell Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost HISTORY IN THE MAKING UNA 2010 Profiles in Excellence — Page 1 RECIPIENT: ACADEMIC AFFAIRS AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING SCHOLARSHIP/RESEARCH “Clearly, the Cold War could not have been called dead as long as Eastern Europe was not free.” – President George H.W. Bush in interview with Dr. Christopher Maynard Christopher Maynard, Associate Professor of History and Chair; B.A., 1994, Lee University; M.A., 1997, Louisiana State University; Ph.D., 2001, Louisiana State University. Dr. Christopher Maynard is chair of the Department of History and Political Science at the University of North Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Poster Presentations
    2008 Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Montreal, Canada POSTER SESSIONS AT A GLANCE FRIDAY, 25 JULY, Poster Session I POSTER PRESENTER(S) POSTER TITLE # 1 C Spencer HerpNET: A Global Virtual Museum of Geospatial Data for Herpetological Collections 2 R Sekonyela Evolutionary relationships of the frog genus Callulops (Anura, Microhylidae) Multiple cryptic species and/or frequent gene introgression? A tale from three high elevation Tibetan 3 J Fu megophryid frogs 4 C Stephen Phylogenetic Analysis of the Iguaninae 5 T Gamble Into the light: Opsin evolution and multiple origins of diurnality in geckos Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms reveal population structuring and long distance dispersal in 6 A Geneva New Caledonian insular gecko species (Reptilia: Diplodactylidae) Phylogeography of the imperiled Redtail Splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni) in Mexico: Implications for taxonomy and 7C Kenway - SI conservation Genetic structure in epigean population of Astyanax mexicanus at Mexican Atlantic slope and some 8 F Garcia biological data in blind forms An mtDNA phylogeny of the subfamily Amphistichinae sheds light on anal fin color polymorphism in the 9 M Westphal silver surfperch, Hyperprosopon ellipticum 10 P Chakrabarty Revision of the Photoplagios leuciscus Günther,1860 Species Complex New species of Leporinus Spix (Characiformes: Anostomidae) from rio Curuá, Iriri-Xingu basin, at Serra do 11 J Birindelli Cachimbo, Brazil 12 T Cavender Construction Of A Cyprinid Prototype 13 K Conway Evolution of the spinous dorsal- and anal-fin
    [Show full text]
  • NRSA 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Appendices (Pdf)
    National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Appendix A: Equipment & Supplies Appendix Equipment A: & Supplies A-1 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 pendix Equipment A: & Supplies Ap A-2 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013/14 Field Operations Manual Version 1.1, April 2013 Base Kit: A Base Kit will be provided to the field crews for all sampling sites that they will go to. Some items are sent in the base kit as extra supplies to be used as needed. Item Quantity Protocol Antibiotic Salve 1 Fish plug Centrifuge tube stand 1 Chlorophyll A Centrifuge tubes (screw-top, 50-mL) (extras) 5 Chlorophyll A Periphyton Clinometer 1 Physical Habitat CST Berger SAL 20 Automatic Level 1 Physical Habitat Delimiter – 12 cm2 area 1 Periphyton Densiometer - Convex spherical (modified with taped V) 1 Physical Habitat D-frame Kick Net (500 µm mesh, 52” handle) 1 Benthics Filteration flask (with silicone stopped and adapter) 1 Enterococci, Chlorophyll A, Periphyton Fish weigh scale(s) 1 Fish plug Fish Voucher supplies 1 pack Fish Voucher Foil squares (aluminum, 3x6”) 1 pack Chlorophyll A Periphyton Gloves (nitrile) 1 box General Graduated cylinder (25 mL) 1 Periphyton Graduated cylinder (250 mL) 1 Chlorophyll A, Periphyton HDPE bottle (1 L, white, wide-mouth) (extras) 12 Benthics, Fish Vouchers HDPE bottle (500 mL, white, wide-mouth) with graduations 1 Periphyton Laboratory pipette bulb 1 Fish Plug Microcentrifuge tubes containing glass beads
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Ecological Links Between Floodplain Forests and Aquatic Communities
    Mississippi State University Scholars Junction Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 4-30-2021 Investigating ecological links between floodplain forests and aquatic communities Conner Owens [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td Recommended Citation Owens, Conner, "Investigating ecological links between floodplain forests and aquatic communities" (2021). Theses and Dissertations. 5130. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/td/5130 This Graduate Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Scholars Junction. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Junction. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigating ecological links between floodplain forests and aquatic communities By TITLE PAGE Conner Owens Approved by: Sandra B. Correa (Major Professor) J. Wesley Neal Scott A. Rush Kevin M. Hunt (Graduate Coordinator) L. Wes Burger (Dean, College of Forest Resources) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Mississippi State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture Mississippi State, Mississippi April 2021 Copyright by COPYRIGHT PAGE Conner Owens 2021 Name: Conner Owens ABSTRACT Date of Degree: April 30, 2021 Institution: Mississippi State University Major Field: Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture Major Professor: Sandra B. Correa Title of Study: Investigating ecological links between floodplain forests and aquatic communities Pages in Study: 110 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science While there is a clear link between riparian forests and freshwater organisms, floodplain forests are seldom investigated due to difficulties in sampling structurally complex and periodically inundated habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Freshwater Fishes As Biological Indicators
    An Introduction to Freshwater Fishes as Biological Indicators EPA-260-R-08-016 November 2008 An Introduction to Freshwater Fishes as Biological Indicators Prepared by: Jeffrey D. Grabarkiewicz1 and Wayne S. Davis2 1Ecological Survey and Design, LLC 1517 W. Temperance Rd. Temperance, MI 48182 2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Office of Information Analysis and Access Washington, DC 20460 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Office of Information Analysis and Access Washington, DC 20460 Printed on chlorine free 100% recycled paper with 100% post-consumer fiber using vegetable-based ink. NOtice This document has been reviewed and approved in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy. Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey and should not be interpreted as conveying official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation for use. Funding was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract # 68-C-04­ 006, Work Assignment #4-79 with the Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc. The appropriate citation for this report is: Grabarkiewicz, J. and W. Davis. 2008. An introduction to freshwater fishes as biological indicators. EPA-260-R-08-016. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington, DC. The entire document can be downloaded from: http://www.epa.gov/bioindicators/html/publications.html ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the many individuals who provided manuscripts and papers for our review and reference. We would also like to thank the various reviewers who provided valuable comments regarding the format and content of this guide including James Kurtenbach, Louis Reynolds, Scott Stranko, and Richard Spear.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline of a Diverse Fish Fauna: Patterns of Im Perilm Ent And
    Decline of a Diverse Fish Fauna: Patterns of Imperilment and Protection in the Southeastern United States Melvin L Warren, JK, Paul L Angermeiev, Brooks M. Burv, and Wendell R. Haag he southeastern United States harbors the richest freshwater fish fauna on the North American continent north of Mexico (Burr and Mayden, 1992), but por- T tents of decline of this great fauna are increasingly acknowledged (e.g., Burr and Warren, 1986; Mount, 1986; Burkhead and Jenkins, 1991; Etnier and Starnes, 1991; Ross and Brenneman, 1991; Gilbert, 1992; Warren and Burr, 1994; Angermeier, 1995; Menhinick, in press). Southeastern fishes (493 species) comprise about 47 percent of the North American fish fauna (1,061 species) and 62 percent of the fauna in the United States (790 species) (Page and Burr, 1991; Burr and Mayden, 1992). Within the United States, imperilment of southeastern fishes is second only to that of western fishes (Will- iams et al., 1989; Minckley and Deacon, 1991; Warren and Burr, 1994). Unlike the southeastern fish fauna, the western fish fauna of North America is relatively depauperate, and the proportion of the western fish fauna that is extinct or threatened with extinction 106 CHAPTER 5: PATERNS OF FISH IMPERILMENT IN THE SOUTHEAST is high (Miller et al., 1989; Moyle and Williams, 1990; Warren and Burr, 1994). In response to wholesale losses of native fishes, comprehensive programs in the west are un- derway or planned to conserve and recover fish diversity (e.g., Minckley and Deacon, 199 1; Moyle and Yoshiyama, 1994), but success of these reactive approaches are as yet un- known.
    [Show full text]