DOCSLIB.ORG

Minimizing the Cost of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minimizing the Cost of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7 (5) (2016) 1819-1834 Sabeen et al. ISSN : 2028-2508 CODEN: JMESCN Minimizing the cost of Municipal solid waste management in Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia A.H. Sabeen1, Norzita Ngadi 1, Zainura Zainon Noor1 1 Department of chemical engineering, University technology Malaysia, Johor, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia Received 15 Jun 2015, Revised 15 Jan 2016, Accepted 25 Jan 2016 *Corresponding author: Norzita Ngadi E-mail: [email protected]; Tel:+60196890870 Abstract Malaysia like any fast developing country is facing a serious problem of the increase in solid waste generation in the urban areas such as Johor Bahru. Therefore, managing of solid waste with less cost is the current dilemma, which is facing the municipality of solid Waste Management in Pasir Gudang. The paper aim is to determine the cost of solid waste management in Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia. In order to achieve this goal, the composition study was conducted in Tanjung langsat Landfill for one year. This study is to evaluate the current municipal solid Waste Management in order to estimate the cost of transportation from various locations in the municipality to Tanjung Langsat landfill. A model is proposed to minimize the cost of transportation to the landfill consisting recycling and reusing some portions of solid wastes. To conduct the assessment, data was collected through personal visits and interviews of stakeholders of the council, also questionnaire survey and review of literature were carried out. The assessment found that Pasir Gudang municipality generates 240,379 kg per day of solid waste. Based on the study also, the per-capita waste generation is 1.13 kg/person/day. The proposed model could reduce the cost of solid Waste Management expenditures from RM 7,130,884.00 to RM 6,093,872.00 that is a cost saving of RM 1,037,012.00 or 14.5% cost reduction every year. This could further prolong the life span of the landfill in the area under study. Keywords: Municipal Solid Waste management, solid waste management. 1. Introduction Solid waste is defined as the surplus products of human and animals in the solid state from the activities discarding by the society [1] The management of solid waste continues to be a big challenge in urban areas throughout the world, especially in the town, villages, where the solid waste increases at an alarming rate, particularly in the underdeveloped countries [2, 3]. According to [4], world population rose to six billion in 2001 with 46% of this population residing in urban areas. Global municipal solid waste generated in 1997 was about 0.49 billion tons with an estimated annual growth rate of 3.2–4.5% in developed nations and 2–3% in developing nations. Solid waste management in Pasir Gudang has a very serious problem associated with the increased waste in various locations of the Pasir Gudang area. This is also augmented the populations increase and the amount of waste per capita to 1.13 kg/day [5]. However, the real problem is how to manage the solid waste with less cost and impacts to the human and environment. The amounts of waste transferred to Tanjung langsat landfill was 350 ton/day [6]. Therefore, the Solid Waste Management system (SWM) needs to be upgraded to suit the present section of solid waste management. A characteristic of a solid waste management system in Pasir Gudang have posed an array of problems, including the low collections, coverage, irregular collection services, crude [7]. In Malaysia as in many underdeveloped countries there is poor in organization of solid waste management due to the lack of awareness and how to manage solid waste with less cost and effects. The lack of reliable database of mange solid waste management system in the underdeveloped countries this contributed to solid waste management to become a serious problem. 1819 J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7 (5) (2016) 1819-1834 Sabeen et al. ISSN : 2028-2508 CODEN: JMESCN The negative effects of solid waste to the human and the environment have been considered as a serious problem. The other problems are caused by technical, financial, institutional, economic, and social factors, which constrain the development of effective solid waste management systems. This, therefore, necessitates the search for a way for the solid waste management with less cost and impacts. This study presents an overview of the current solid waste management practices in Pasir Gudang and also how best practices can be sustained towards the solid waste management in Malaysia. Therefore, the main focus of the study is to minimize the cost of solid waste in Pasir gudang Johor, Malaysia through the treatment of some portion of the solid waste. 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Study area Pasir Gudang is an industrial town located in east of Johor Bahru, it 35 Km away from Johor Baharu town. According to Iskandar Malaysia [8] the population of Pasir Gudang Johor Malaysia is 211,900 people in the year 2010. Over time there has been an increase in the population in Johor generally and especially in Pasir Gudang “between 2000 to 2010”. Consequently, the average municipal solid waste (MSW) generated is found to be 0.5 - 0.8 kg by day per capita [9]. As such the high number of the population in Pasir Gudang have resulted with a corresponding high increase in of solid waste in the area which makes (MSW) municipal solid waste management crucial. The traditional way for treatment of solid waste in Malaysia, especially in Johor Bahru to be the landfilling method, which has existed for many decades [6]. Landfills still cover 60 to 90% of the served areas, and are projected to cover more than 75% soon with 80 % of the waste-disposal sites having less than two years of remaining operating life [2]. This has necessitated the urgency for municipalities to secure new landfills is a priority before the existing ones get exhausted Landfilling and open dumping are practiced and this is likely going to continue [10]. 2.2 Classification of (MSW) Municipal solid waste depends on many factors: location, lifestyle, season, packaging, and local authorities. Therefore, detailed classification and quantification of MSW is desired to obtain accurate data concerning estimating the current and future trend in MSW in necessary. In addition, universal classification system is required to be applied by any municipality, irrespective of national or regional differences [10]. There are many sources where solid waste is produced every day. Some of these sources include the households, offices, schools, shops, hotels, and other enterprises. The proportions include paper, plastics, metals, rags and glass and other sources produced of solid waste [11]. Classifications are based on domestic institution, commercial industrial construction and sever based waste. Yet another classification is based on organic combustible inorganic, non-combustible, and putrescible, [12]. Furthermore, there exist other MSW such as those found on the roadside, sewage, dead animals and street sweeping. Above all, as outlined in Table 1 and more specifically, municipal solid waste is defined as any rubbish, or refuse, sludge from a waste treatment plant, including semisolid or contained gaseous material that is resulting from industrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations and from any community activities [13]. Table 1: Waste sort analysis by type, content, and source (ISW1970) Types Contents Sources Industrial wastes Food processing wastes , boiler house cinders , Power plants ; Factories ; Companies lumber scraps , metal scraps , shaving Street refuse Leaves , dirt , catch basin dirt , sweepings , Alleys, vacant lots contents, Street , Sidewalks Sewage treatment Solid from coarse screening and from grit Sewage treatment Wastes chambers ; septic tank Plants , septic tanks Demolition Demolition sites to be used for new Lumber pipes, brick, masonry, scrap lumber and and construction buildings ; Renewal, projects other construction materials from razed building. waste expressway, new construction. 1820 J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7 (5) (2016) 1819-1834 Sabeen et al. ISSN : 2028-2508 CODEN: JMESCN Similarly, Table 2 also gives an outline of solid waste generation, Source activities and location associated with various source classifications. Table 2: Typical solid waste generation, Source activities and location associate with various sources classifications (EPA) Source Activities and location Type of solid wastes Industrial Construction , fabrication , light and heavy Rubbish , food waste manufacturing , refineries , chemical plants , Ashes lumbering , mining , power plants , demolition . Special wastes Open areas Streets , Alleys , parks , vacant lots , , playgrounds, Rubbish , dirt beaches , highway , recreational areas Residential Single – family and multi – family Food waste , Dwellings , low , medium Rubbish , ashes , Special wastes Treatment Water , waste water and industrial treatment process Treatment plant wastes plant sites Principally composed of residual sludge Agriculture Field and row crops , orchards , Alleys, vacant lots Vineyard , dairies , feedlots , farms Street , Sidewalks Stores , restaurants , markets , offices , Food waste , rubbish , ashes Commercial Municipal Buildings , hotels , print shops , medical facilities ,demolition and construction and enterprises Wastes. 2.3 Solid waste generation in Malaysia Solid wastes are testified to be substances that are generated as no more useful or having no values than to be disposed. The increment of solid waste generated to step up to 7.0 t/y million tons in 2010 in Malaysia [15].15 to 39 % million tons of the total municipal solid waste of the year 2010 was expected to be combustion. The percentage of total municipal solid waste being disposed in landfills is decreasing; the actual tonnage was expected to increase from 118 million tons in the year of 1995 to 125 million tons by the year 2010. However, because of the economic boom, the tonnage already increased to 2.5 million tons in 1991 to 7.0 million tons by the year 2010. However, because of the economic boom, the tonnage already increased from 2.5 million tons in 1991to 17.0 million ton in the year 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I-Park@Indahpura Brochure
    Malaysia’s Premium Industrial Park This is Where The Most Sustainable & Your Success is Shaped by Design, Well-managed Industrial Park not Chance ... WORLD CLASS INFRASTRUCTURE & AMENITIES Upgrading and expanding your business operations is now a breeze at i-Park@Indahpura. A fully Overall Development Land Area integrated industrial park catering to the ever-growing demand for quality industrial developments built to international standards. This state-of-the-art park is the ultimate location for industries that wish to expand and upgrade their operations. Fully Gated & Perimeter Fencing Natural High Speed Ample of Electric Guarded with 24-Hour with CCTV Gas Broadband & Water Supply acres Security Control Surveillance (Unifi) 230 Besides being the first holistically managed industrial park in Iskandar Malaysia, i-Park@Indahpura offers its tenants 24-hour security within a fenced compound, world-class infrastructures and industry-leading lush landscaping surrounding the compound. FREEHOLD The i-Park premier fully integrated industrial park development addresses all the sustainability and adaptability issues in such developments. The holistic park management includes strict security Worker’s Green Ready Built / Build with Option to Rent / Platinum Winner of procedures to ensure the safety of each and every tenant, employee and goods within the Dormitory Building Design & Built Fast Speed Outright development each day. Scheduled daily maintenance of the park’s landscape and cleanliness Delivery Purchase helps keep the vicinity pristine. Recognising
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Change Research Projects in Malaysia
    Land Use Change Research Projects in Malaysia Mastura Mahmud Earth Observation Centre Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia NASA-LCLUC Science Team Joint Meeting with MAIRS, GOFC-GOLD and SEA START Programs on Land-Cover/Land-Use Change Processes in Monsoon Asia Region, January 12-17, 2009 in Khon Kaen, Thailand Outline of presentation • Large Development Regions • Landslide Issues • Biomass Burning and Impacts South Johor Development Area • Iskandar Malaysia covers 221,634.1 hectares (2,216.3 km²) of land area within the southern most part of Johor. • The development region encompasses an area about 3 times the size of Singapore. • Iskandar Malaysia covers the entire district of Johor Bahru (including the island within the district), Mukim Jeram Batu, Mukim Sungai Karang, Mukim Serkat, and Kukup Island in Mukim Ayer Masin, all within the district of Pontian. • Five Flagship Zones are proposed as key focal points for developments in the Iskandar Malaysia. Four of the focal points will be located in the Nusajaya-Johor Bahru-Pasir Gudang corridor (Special Economic Corridor -(SEC)). The flagship zones would strengthen further existing economic clusters as well as to diversify and develop targeted growth factors. • Flagship Zone A – Johor Bahru City Centre(New financial district , Central business district , Danga Bay integrated waterfront city , Tebrau Plentong mixed development , Causeway (Malaysia/Singapore) • Flagship Zone B - Nusajaya (Johor state administrative centre , Medical hub , Educity , International destination resort , Southern Industrial logistic cluster ) • Flagship Zone C - Western Gate Development (Port of Tanjung Pelepas , 2nd Link (Malaysia/Singapore) , Free Trade Zone , RAMSAR World Heritage Park , Tanjung Piai ) • Flagship Zone D - Eastern Gate Development ( Pasir Gudang Port and industrial zone , Tanjung Langsat Port , Tanjung Langsat Technology Park, Kim-Kim regional distribution centre ).
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia Industrial Park Directory.Pdf
    MALAYSIA INDUSTRIAL PARK DIRECTORY CONTENT 01 FOREWORD 01 › Minister of International Trade & Industry (MITI) › Chief Executive Officer of Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA) › President, Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) › Chairman, FMM Infrastructure & Industrial Park Management Committee 02 ABOUT MIDA 05 03 ABOUT FMM 11 04 ADVERTISEMENT 15 05 MAP OF MALAYSIA 39 06 LISTING OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS › NORTHERN REGION Kedah & Perlis 41 Penang 45 Perak 51 › CENTRAL REGION Selangor 56 Negeri Sembilan 63 › SOUTHERN REGION Melaka 69 Johor 73 › EAST COAST REGION Kelantan 82 Terengganu 86 Pahang 92 › EAST MALAYSIA Sarawak 97 Sabah 101 PUBLISHED BY PRINTED BY Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (7907-X) Legasi Press Sdn Bhd Wisma FMM, No 3, Persiaran Dagang, No 17A, (First Floor), Jalan Helang Sawah, PJU 9 Bandar Sri Damansara, 52200 Kuala Lumpur Taman Kepong Baru, Kepong, 52100 Kuala Lumpur T 03-62867200 F 03-62741266/7288 No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form E [email protected] without prior permission from Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. All rights reserved. All information and data www.fmm.org.my provided in this book are accurate as at time of printing MALAYSIA INDUSTRIAL PARK DIRECTORY FOREWORD MINISTER OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & INDUSTRY (MITI) One of the key ingredients needed is the availability of well-planned and well-managed industrial parks with Congratulations to the Malaysian Investment eco-friendly features. Thus, it is of paramount importance Development Authority (MIDA) and the for park developers and relevant authorities to work Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers together in developing the next generation of industrial (FMM) for the successful organisation of areas to cater for the whole value chain of the respective the Industrial Park Forum nationwide last industry, from upstream to downstream.
    [Show full text]
  • MALAYSIA COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SENTIMENT SURVEY 2020 (CREISS 2020) Johor Sentiment
    MALAYSIA COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SENTIMENT SURVEY 2020 (CREISS 2020) Johor Sentiment Since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, investors are more cautious and defensive on their investments in the commercial property market. Tourism, one of the promoted sectors, is focused mainly in Iskandar Malaysia. However, with the unavoidable catastrophe of the COVID-19 outbreak, the hotel / leisure segment is severely impacted following cancellation of hotel bookings, flights, and tour packages. Our respondents are also taking a cautious stance on the office sub-sector in 2020. With slower absorption rate notably on the newer office buildings, particularly in Johor Bahru, this sub-sector is deemed less attractive. Although we were pleasantly greeted by our respondents’ positive sentiments on the retail sector, the current widespread transmission of COVID-19 and the prolonged movement control order (MCO) will be a double-whammy to both consumers and investors. The healthcare sub-sector, however, continues to receive confidence in the market. In terms of return and yield, more than half of the respondents are more optimistic on the sub-sector in 2020 compared to 2019. The logistics / industrial segment stood out as the most encouraging sub-sector with a few announcements that include the expansion of Port of Tanjung Pelepas and the development of the bunker island in Tanjung Bin. These developments, once in fruition, will become catalysts that will strengthen the sub-sector in Johor. Amid this current cloud of uncertainties, there are tremendous opportunities for players with cash looking for bargains. Debbie Choy, Branch Head Knight Frank Malaysia, Johor Branch Logistics to remain upbeat The outlook for the state’s logistic sub-sector remains upbeat supported by the presence of three seaports, namely Port of Tanjung Pelepas, Johor Port and Tanjung Langsat Port as well as the Senai International Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Masjid Di Negeri Johor – Johor Bahru
    MASJID DAERAH JOHOR BAHRU BAHAGIAN PENGURUSAN MASJID DAN SURAU JABATAN AGAMA JOHOR JAJ.PMS.010/115/8/JB- MAKLUMAT MASJID BIL NAMA KOD MUKIM KATEGORI MASJID 1 MASJID SULTAN ABU BAKAR, JLN GERTAK MERAH 80100 JOHOR BAHRU 001 BANDAR MASJID KERAJAAN 2 MASJID KG MELAYU MAJIDEE, JLN MASJID, 81100 JOHOR BAHRU 002 BANDAR MASJID KERAJAAN 3 MASJID TUN HUSSEIN ONN, JLN LANGKASUKA, 80350 JOHOR BAHRU 003 BANDAR MASJID KERAJAAN 4 MASJID AT-TAQWA, TAMAN PELANGI, JLN SRI PELANGI, TAMAN PELANGI, 80400 JOHOR BAHRU 004 BANDAR MASJID KERAJAAN 5 MASJID PASIR PELANGI, JLN PASIR PELANGI, 80050 JOHOR BAHRU 005 BANDAR MASJID KERAJAAN 6 MASJID TELUK BELANGAH, SINGAPURA 006 SINGAPURA MASJID KERAJAAN 7 MASJID KG KURNIA, JLN ANUGERAH, KG KURNIA, 80250 JOHOR BAHRU 007 BANDAR MASJID KARIAH 8 MASJID TMN DATO'ONN, LOT 7399 JLN DATO' ONN LARKIN 80350 JOHOR BAHRU 008 SDA MASJID KARIAH 9 MASJID AR-RAUDAH, KG. DATO' ONN, JLN SENTOSA, 80350 LARKIN J. BAHRU 009 SDA MASJID KARIAH 10 MASJID BANDAR BARU UDA, JLN PADI RIA, BANDAR BARU UDA, 81200 J. BAHRU 010 SDA MASJID KARIAH 11 MASJID LARKIN CENTRAL, TERMINAL BAS LARKIN, 80350 JOHOR BAHRU 011 SDA MASJID INSTITUSI 12 MASJID AL-HANA, JLN WADI HANA, 80000 JOHOR BAHRU 012 SDA MASJID KARIAH 13 MASJID BUKIT CAGAR, FLET BUKIT CAGAR, 80000 JOHOR BAHRU 013 SDA MASJID KARIAH 14 MASJID KOLAM AIR, LOT PTD 14950 JLN AYER MOLEK, 80100 JOHOR BAHRU 014 SDA MASJID KARIAH 15 MASJID AN-NUR, GELERIA KOTARAYA, 80000 JOHOR BAHRU 015 SDA MASJID INSTITUSI 16 MASJID INDIA AHMAD AWANG, NO. 1, JLN DUKE, 80000 JOHOR BAHRU 016 SDA MASJID KARIAH 17 MASJID
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies on Joint Crediting Mechanism Projects Towards Environmentally Sustainable Cities in Asia
    Feasibility Studies on Joint Crediting Mechanism Projects towards Environmentally Sustainable Cities in Asia Feasibility Study on a Large-Scale GHG Emissions-Reduction Project Development in the Iskandar Development Region, Malaysia Final report March 2015 The Japan Research Institute, Limited Contents I. Results of the Survey .................................................................................................... 5 1. Survey background and purpose ................................................................................... 7 1-1. Background of the survey ............................................................................................. 7 1-2. Purpose of the survey.................................................................................................... 9 2. Research plan ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Overview and schedule of research............................................................................. 11 3. Survey results ............................................................................................................. 13 3-1. Outline of the survey field .......................................................................................... 13 3-1-1. The survey filed .......................................................................................................... 13 3.2. Low-carbon development for residential areas ........................................................... 20
    [Show full text]
  • EIA) Auditing on the Operational of Langsat Terminal (One)(Lgt-1) at Tanjung Langsat, Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim
    Faculty of Health Science , Campus of Puncak Alam E-PJJ Bachelor Degree Program of Environmental Safety & Health (HS223) Full Report of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Auditing on the operational of Langsat Terminal (One)(LgT-1) at Tanjung Langsat, Pasir Gudang, Johor Darul Takzim Prepared by GROUP JOHOR Group Leader: MOHD RUHAIZIE BIN RIYADZI (2010282848) EHOA at Port of Tanjung Pelepas Health Office, Johor Secretary: NORADILLAH BINTI ABD. RAZAK (2010671116) EHOA at Pasir Gudang Municipal Council, Johor Safety Officer: SITI MASHALIDA BINTI JOHAR (2010249312) EHOA at Port of Tanjung Pelepas Health Office, Johor Logistic and Task Officer: SITI AISHAH BINTI MAHADI (2010486108) EHOA at Stulang Laut (Enterance) Health Office, Johor Langsat Terminal (One) Environmental Auditing & Health Impact Assessment 2011 Table of Content Page Table of Content 1 Executive Summary 3 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Objectives 15 2.1 General Objective 15 2.2 Specific Objectives 15 3.0 Description of Work 16 4.0 Noise Exposure Monitoring 19 4.1 Objectives 19 4.2 Literature Review 19 4.3 Methodologies 25 4.4 Results 31 4.5 Existing Control Measures 34 4.6 Discussions and Conclusions 36 4.7 Recommendation 36 5.0 Air Quality Monitoring 37 5.1 Objectives 37 5.2 Literature Review 37 5.3 Methodologies 40 Mohd Ruhaizie R., Noradillah A.R., Siti Mashalida J. & Siti Aishah M. Bachelor Degree in Environmental Safety & Health (Hons.) Page 1 Langsat Terminal (One) Environmental Auditing & Health Impact Assessment 2011 5.4 Results 44 5.5 Existing Control Measures 45 5.6 Discussions
    [Show full text]
  • Spratly Islands
    R i 120 110 u T4-Y5 o Ganzhou Fuqing n h Chenzhou g Haitan S T2- J o Dao Daojiang g T3 S i a n Putian a i a n X g i Chi-lung- Chuxiong g n J 21 T6 D Kunming a i Xingyi Chang’an o Licheng Xiuyu Sha Lung shih O J a T n Guilin T O N pa Longyan T7 Keelung n Qinglanshan H Na N Lecheng T8 T1 - S A an A p Quanzhou 22 T'ao-yüan Taipei M an T22 I L Ji S H Zhongshu a * h South China Sea ng Hechi Lo-tung Yonaguni- I MIYAKO-RETTO S K Hsin-chu- m c Yuxi Shaoguan i jima S A T21 a I n shih Suao l ) Zhangzhou Xiamen c e T20 n r g e Liuzhou Babu s a n U T Taichung e a Quemoy p i Meizhou n i Y o J YAEYAMA-RETTO a h J t n J i Taiwan C L Yingcheng K China a a Sui'an ( o i 23 n g u H U h g n g Fuxing T'ai- a s e i n Strait Claimed Straight Baselines Kaiyuan H ia Hua-lien Y - Claims in the Paracel and Spratly Islands Bose J Mai-Liao chung-shih i Q J R i Maritime Lines u i g T9 Y h e n e o s ia o Dongshan CHINA u g B D s Tropic of Cancer J Hon n Qingyuan Tropic of Cancer Established maritime boundary ian J Chaozhou Makung n Declaration of the People’s Republic of China on the Baseline of the Territorial Sea, May 15, 1996 g i Pingnan Heyuan PESCADORES Taiwan a Xicheng an Wuzhou 21 25° 25.8' 00" N 119° 56.3' 00" E 31 21° 27.7' 00" N 112° 21.5' 00" E 41 18° 14.6' 00" N 109° 07.6' 00" E While Bandar Seri Begawan has not articulated claims to reefs in the South g Jieyang Chaozhou 24 T19 N BRUNEI Claim line Kaihua T10- Hsi-yü-p’ing Chia-i 22 24° 58.6' 00" N 119° 28.7' 00" E 32 19° 58.5' 00" N 111° 16.4' 00" E 42 18° 19.3' 00" N 108° 57.1' 00" E China Sea (SCS), since 1985 the Sultanate has claimed a continental shelf Xinjing Guiping Xu Shantou T11 Yü Luxu n Jiang T12 23 24° 09.7' 00" N 118° 14.2' 00" E 33 19° 53.0' 00" N 111° 12.8' 00" E 43 18° 30.2' 00" N 108° 41.3' 00" E X Puning T13 that extends beyond these features to a hypothetical median with Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Johor 81900 Kota Tinggi
    Bil. Bil Nama Alamat Daerah Dun Parlimen Kelas BLOK B BLOK KELICAP PUSAT TEKNOLOGI TINGGI ADTEC JALAN 1 TABIKA KEMAS ADTEC Batu Pahat Senggarang Batu Pahat 1 TANJONG LABOH KARUNG BERKUNCI 527 83020 BATU PAHAT Tangkak (Daerah 2 TABIKA KEMAS DEWAN PUTERA JALAN JAAMATKG PADANG LEREK 1 80900 TANGKAK Tangkak Ledang 1 Kecil) 3 TABIKA KEMAS FELDA BUKIT BATU FELDA BUKIT BATU 81020 KULAI Kulai Jaya Bukit Batu Kulai 1 Bukit 4 TABIKA KEMAS KG TUI 2 TABIKA KEMAS KG. TUI 2 BUKIT KEPONG 84030 BUKIT KEPONG Muar Pagoh 1 Serampang BALAI RAYAKAMPUNG PARIT ABDUL RAHMANPARIT SULONG 5 TABIKA KEMAS PT.HJ ABD RAHMAN Batu Pahat Sri Medan Parit Sulong 1 83500 BATU PAHAT 6 TABIKA KEMAS PUTRA JL 8 JALAN LAMA 83700 YONG PENG Batu Pahat Yong Peng Ayer Hitam 2 7 TABIKA KEMAS SERI BAYU 1 NO 12 JALAN MEWAH TAMAN MEWAH 83700 YONG PENG Batu Pahat Yong Peng Ayer Hitam 1 39 JALAN BAYU 14 TAMAN SERI BAYU YONG PENG 83700 BATU 8 TABIKA KEMAS SERI BAYU 2 Batu Pahat Yong Peng Ayer Hitam 1 PAHAT TABIKA KEMAS TAMAN BUKIT NO 1 JALAN GEMILANG 2/3A TAMAN BUKIT BANANG 83000 BATU 9 Batu Pahat Senggarang Batu Pahat 1 BANANG PAHAT 10 TABIKA KEMAS TAMAN HIDAYAT BALAI SERBAGUNA TAMAN HIDAYAT 81500 PEKAN NANAS Pontian Pekan Nanas Tanjong Piai 1 11 TABIKA KEMAS TAMAN SENAI INDAH JALAN INDAH 5 TAMAN SENAI INDAH 81400 SENAI Kulai Jaya Senai Kulai 1 TABIKA KEMAS ( JAKOA ) KG SRI BALAI TABIKA KEMAS JAKOA KAMPUNG SRI DUNGUN 82000 12 Pontian Pulai Sebatang Pontian 2 DUNGUN PONTIAN 13 TABIKA KEMAS (JAKOA ) KG BARU TABIKA JAKOA KG BARU KUALA BENUT 82200 PONTIAN Pontian Benut Pontian 1 14 TABIKA
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Iskandar Malaysia
    INVESTING IN ISKANDAR MALAYSIA 07/217 shinewingtyteoh.com Content Chapter 1 Quick Fact: Iskandar Malaysia 3 Chapter 2 Tax Incentives For Promoted Activities in Iskandar a) Incentives through the Malaysian 4 Industrial Development Authority (‘MIDA’) b) Incentives through the Multimedia 5 Development Corporation (‘MDEC’) c) Incentives through the Ministry of 6 Agriculture d) Incentives through the Malaysia 6 Islamic Financial Centre (‘MIFC’) e) Incentives through the Malaysian 6 Biotechnology Corporation f) Incentives through the Halal Industry 7 Development Corporation (HDC) Why ShineWing TY TEOH 8 Appendix I - Flagship A : Johor Bahru City 9 Appendix II - Flagship B : Nusajaya 12 Appendix III - Flagship C : Western Gate 16 Development Appendix IV - Flagship D : Eastern Gate 20 Development Appendix V - Flagship E : Senai Skudai 23 QUICK FACTS: ISKANDAR MALAYSIA Iskandar Malaysia has been allocated RM6.83 billion by the Malaysia Government and is set to locate in Johor, the southern gateway to Peninsular Malaysia, its advantages include: a. Six (6) to eight (8) hours flight radius from Asia's burgeoning growth centres such as Bangalore, Dubai, Hong Kong, Seoul, Shanghai, Taipei and Tokyo. b. Within reach of a global market of some 800 million people. c. Accessible by air, land, rail and sea. d. Flanked by three major ports, the Pasir Gudang Port, Port of Tanjung Pelepas and Tanjung Langsat Port. Five Flagship Zones have been designated as key focal points for development in Iskandar Malaysia. These flagship zones have been envisaged to both further strengthen existing economic clusters as well as diversify and develop targeted growth sectors. Refer to Appendix for more details.
    [Show full text]
  • EIA Reports Approved (PEIA)
    Jumlah Laporan Lulus: 149 EIA Reports Approved (PEIA) # Nama Projek Nama Penggerak Projek Nama Syarikat Negeri Tahun Tarikh Terima Tarikh Keputusan Ringkasan Eksekutif Jururunding EIA 1 PEIA Bagi Cadangan 404 Hektar Projek Jana Armada Sdn Bhd GS Alam Lestari KELANTAN 2015 26/11/2015 31/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun Pengkayaan Hutan Dgn Pokok Getah Klon Balak Solutions (TLC) Di HSK Balah Kompartmen 143, 144, 176, 178, 179 (Sebahagian), Mkm Ulu Nenggiri, D. Bertam, Gua Musang, Kelantan DN oleh Jana Armada Sdn Bhd 2 EIA Bagi Cadangan Membina dan Menyiapkan Baldah Toyyibah UniSZA KELANTAN 2015 01/12/2015 31/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun Jajaran 10KM Lebuhraya Rakyat dari Machang ke (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Consultancy Sdn Kuala Krai, Kelantan Darul Naim yang Bhd Bhd Menghubungkan Bukit Tiu dan Berangan Mek Nab oleh Baldah Toyyibah (Prasarana) Kelantan Sdn Bhd 3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) For The Kelana Ventures Sdn Bhd Europasia NEGERI 2015 30/11/2015 31/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun Proposed Markas 1 Briged Tentera Darat Malaysia Engineering Sdn SEMBILAN on Part of Lot 20040, Mukim Si Rusa, Daerah Port Bhd Dickson, Negeri Sembilan 4 THE PROPOSED SAND MINING OPERATION SOLARIS SEIAJAYA SBA SELANGOR 2015 28/12/2015 31/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun SDN. BHD. CONSULTANS 5 THE PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE AND ISKANDAR ENVILAB SDN. JOHOR 2015 22/12/2015 29/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun AMENITIES(CENTRALIZE SEWAGE TREATMENT WATERFRONT SDN. BHD. PLANT AND SUB­STATION) ON PART OF LOT BHD. 45422,LOT 45366,LOT 45368 AND LOT 45369,PERSIARAN ISKANDAR SULTAN,BANDAR JOHOR BAHRU,DAERAH JOHOR BAHRU,JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM 6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) Malaysian Phosphate Chemsain SARAWAK 2015 20/11/2015 29/12/2015 Klik untuk Muat turun FOR THE PROPOSED INTEGRATED PHOSPHATE Additives (Sarawak) Sdn.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia) - Supplementary Report
    wmff 25-02, Jalan Austin Heights 8/5, Taman Mount Austin, 81100 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia Tel/Fax : +607-364 2610, HP :+6012-707 2610 Email : [email protected] / [email protected] www.detec.my GST number : 001794056192 __________________________________________________________________________________________ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) - SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT THE PROPOSED PRODUCTION OF EXTENDER OILS AT PLO 13, JALAN TENGAR, TANJUNG LANGSAT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, MUKIM SG TIRAM, DAERAH JOHOR BAHRU, JOHOR Prepared for Prepared by Norman Process Oils Malaysia Plant Sdn Bhd Daya Eco Techno Sdn Bhd Level 11, 1 Sentral 25-02, Jalan Austin Heights 8/5 Jalan Travers Taman Mount Austin Kuala Lumpur Sentral 81100 Johor Bahru Johor 50470 Kuala Lumpur Tel/Fax : 07-364 2610 PIC. : Ir Linda Tan (012-7072610) FEBRUARY 2016 Doc Ref: NORMAN/1602-01 PERAKUAN PEMAJU PROJEK Bersama ini kami mengemukakan laporan EIA Tambahan bagi Proposed Production of Extender Oils at PLO 13, Jalan Tengar, Tanjung Langsat Industrial Complex, Mukim Sg Tiram, Daerah Johor Bahru, Johor bertarikh Februari 2016. Laporan EIA Tambahan in adalah untuk melengkapkan Laporan EIA bagi cadangan projek yang sama yang telah dikemukakan sebelum ini melalui surat rujukan EIA/NORMAN/01 bertarikh 19hb November 2015 bagi tujuan penilaian pihak tuan. Kami maklum bahawa laporan EIA Tambahan ini akan dinilai bersama dengan Laporan EIA berkenaan. Signature : Official Stamp Name : IC/ Passport : Position : Date : TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PREAMBLE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]