DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report Gathering Places Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members did not identify any gathering places during the TLU for the Project. No mitigation was requested for gathering places by Aseniwuche Winewak Nation. Sacred Sites Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members did not identify specific sacred sites during the TLU for the Project. Community members explained that the Hinton area is culturally important and presently used by Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members, whereas the Valemount area is also culturally important, but not currently used. Community members did not expect to find sacred sites during ground reconnaissance due to extensive industrial development in Hinton and surrounding areas (Aseniwuche Environmental Corporation 2013). Aseniwuche Winewak Nation requested notification if culturally relevant sites are found during Project construction and that the sites are protected by a 100 m buffer. 5.2 Hargreaves to Darfield Segment The results of TLU studies conducted to date have identified TLU sites potentially affected by the Hargreaves to Darfield segment and associated Project components requiring mitigation. 5.2.1 Lheidli T’enneh Lheidli T’enneh elected to conduct a third-party TLU study for the Project. A third-party consultant, Chignecto Consulting Group conducted a map review, community interviews and ground reconnaissance that focused on Crown lands within the asserted traditional territory of Lheidli T’enneh. The findings of the TLU study have not been reviewed or approved by Lheidli T’enneh Chief and Council or community. The interim report is considered draft and any changes resulting from review with the Lheidli T’enneh community will be incorporated into the final report. Additional Issues of concern, traditional use sites or features identified through ongoing engagement with Lheidli T’enneh will be considered for incorporation into Project planning including the EPPs and the Environmental Alignment Sheets, as appropriate. The results of these ongoing engagement efforts will be provided to the NEB. The results of the Lheidli T’enneh TLU study received on November 20, 2013 are summarized below. Where available, approximate distances and directions of specific geographic areas from the proposed pipeline corridor were determined by TERA based on the information provided in the Lheidli T’enneh TLU study and are described in Tables 5.2.1-1 to 5.2.1-2. 5.2.1.1 Community Participants The names of participating Lheidli T’enneh community members were not released, as requested by Lheidli T’enneh. Thirteen community members were interviewed and 10 community members conducted ground reconnaissance, with support from Chignecto Consulting Group representatives. 5.2.1.2 Results The map review, interviews and ground reconnaissance did not reveal any TLU sites within the proposed pipeline corridor requiring mitigation as requested by Lheidli T’enneh. Trails and Travelways Lheidli T’enneh community members did not identify any trails and travelways during the TLU for the Project. No mitigation was requested for trails and travelways by Lheidli T’enneh. 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00035 Page 5-97 Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report Habitation Sites Lheidli T’enneh community members did not identify any habitation sites during the TLU study for the Project. No mitigation was requested for habitation sites by Lheidli T’enneh. Plant Gathering Lheidli T’enneh community members identified two plant gathering sites during the TLU for the Project, detailed in Table 5.2.2-1. In addition to the sites listed in Table 5.2.1-1, community members stated that the eastern area of Lheidli T’enneh traditional territory is currently used for general berry gathering (Chignecto Consulting Group 2013). TABLE 5.2.1-1 PLANT GATHERING IDENTIFIED BY LHEIDLI T’ENNEH Approximate Distance and Current/Past Requested Direction from Project Area Site Description Use Mitigation 3.2 km northeast of RK 490 Medicinal plant gathering around Mount Current/Past None Robson 1.7 km east of RK 523.3 Blueberry, raspberry and soapberry picking Current/Past None from Valemount to Tête Jaune Cache No plant gathering sites were identified within the proposed pipeline corridor during the TLU study. No mitigation was requested for plant gathering sites by Lheidli T’enneh. Hunting Lheidli T’enneh community members identified one hunting site during the TLU for the Project, in the general area around Mount Terry Fox located 8.9 km east of RK 510. Community members stated that elk and moose were commonly hunted. In addition to the area around Mount Terry Fox, the western part of Lheidli T’enneh traditional territory is most commonly hunted (Chignecto Consulting Group 2013). No hunting sites were identified within the proposed pipeline corridor during the TLU study. No mitigation was requested for hunting sites by Lheidli T’enneh. Fishing Lheidli T’enneh community members identified two fishing sites during the TLU study for the Project, detailed in Table 5.2.1-2. Community members expressed concern regarding the health of the Fraser River and its tributaries with the construction and operation of the Project. Fishing has remained an important cultural tradition in the Lheidli T’enneh community and community members would like to preserve fish resources (Chignecto Consulting Group 2013). TABLE 5.2.1-2 FISHING SITES IDENTIFIED BY LHEIDLI T’ENNEH Approximate Distance and Current/Past Requested Direction from Project Area Site Description Use Mitigation 5.4 km northwest of RK 506 Rainbow and bull trout fishing around Current/Past None confluence of Fraser and McLennan rivers 6.7 km east of RK 530 Fishing area at north end of Kinbasket Lake Current None No fishing sites were identified within the proposed pipeline corridor during the TLU study. No mitigation was requested for fishing sites by Lheidli T’enneh. 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00035 Page 5-98 Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report Trapping Lheidli T’enneh community members did not identify any trapping sites during the TLU for the Project. No mitigation was requested for trapping sites by Lheidli T’enneh. Gathering Places Lheidli T’enneh community members identified one gathering place during the TLU for the Project, around Moose Lake which is located 18.2 km southeast of RK 490. Community members stated that this area was used in the past as a meeting area with tribes east of the Rocky Mountains (Chignecto Consulting Group 2013). No gathering places were identified within the proposed pipeline corridor during the TLU study. No mitigation was requested for gathering places by Lheidli T’enneh. Sacred Sites Lheidli T’enneh community members identified one sacred site during the TLU study for the Project. During ground reconnaissance, a cache pit was found in the Tête Jaune Cache area, located 3 km northwest of RK 507 (Chignecto Consulting Group 2013). No sacred sites were identified within the proposed pipeline corridor during the TLU study. No mitigation was requested for sacred sites by Lheidli T’enneh. 5.2.2 Simpcw First Nation Trans Mountain and Simpcw First Nation have engaged in discussions to determine the community’s interest and a process for their involvement in Project activities. Simpcw First Nation elected to conduct an independent, community led TLU study for the Project. Issues of concern, traditional use sites or features identified through ongoing engagement with Simpcw First Nation will be considered for incorporation into Project planning including the EPPs and the Environmental Alignment Sheets, as appropriate. The results of these ongoing engagement efforts will be provided to the NEB. 5.2.3 Lhtako Dene Nation Lhtako Dene Nation elected to conduct a TERA-led TLU study for the Project. The TLU study will include field reconnaissance of areas of interest, concern or importance identified during the community map review. Lhtako Dene Nation provided their preliminary ‘Letter of Understanding in respect of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project’ to Trans Mountain on August 29, 2013, that describes their preliminary interests in the Project, including: • effects of the Project on hunting, fishing, gathering medicinal plants and berry picking, which are an important part of the lives of Lhtako Dene Nation members; • communal gatherings and outings to different parts of the traditional Lhtako Dene territory are conducted to keep the connection of the people to the land; • historical village sites around the Bowron, Quesnel and Horsefly lakes; • the sub-alpine regions in traditional Lhtako Dene territory are customarily used for hunting, harvesting of medicinal plants and berry-picking; • there are important fishing sites in the traditional territory of Lhtako Dene Nation; • Elders of Lhtako Dene Nation are opposed to the Project because of the risk of spills, however minimal; 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00035 Page 5-99 Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report • Lhtako Dene elders are the keepers of their traditional territory and speak for mother
Recommended publications
  • From Semiahmoo First Nation to the Review Panel Re: Oral Presentation

    From Semiahmoo First Nation to the Review Panel Re: Oral Presentation

    Date: May 16, 2019 s EMIAHMOO FIRST NATION Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Roberts Bank Terminal2 Project Public Hearing Phase Overview of Oral Hearing Submission by Semiahmoo First Nation To: Cindy Parker Review Panel Manager Roberts Bank Termina12 Project c/o Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Ottawa, ON K1A OH3 16049 Beach Road, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3Z 9R6 Tel: 604.536.3101 Fax: 604.536.6116 E-mail: [email protected] The Semiahmoo First Nation ("Semiahmoo") holds Aboriginal rights and title and exercises our rights, practices and culture throughout our Traditional Territory. Additionally, Semiahmoo exercises our rights, practices and culture throughout the broader resources area, which includes the lower Fraser River, Roberts Bank, Semiahmoo Bay, Boundary Bay, Fraser River, Nicomekl River, Serpentine River, Little Campbell River the Gulf Islands including San Juan Island, Vancouver Island, Washington State and the Salish Sea. Semiahmoo has communicated the adverse effects of the Roberts Band Terminal2 Project ("RBT2") on our Aboriginal rights and title to the project proponent and the Crown. Semiahmoo has previously demanded studies regarding cumulative effects of marine shipping in regard to the regarding the Marine Shipping Addendum and RBT2 including: • a traditional marine use study to examine the impacts on our Aboriginal rights and title; • a study of the effects of sedimentation on the foreshore of the Semiahmoo Indian Reserve lands from the tide, current and
  • Section 12.0: Aborigin Al Consultation

    Section 12.0: Aborigin Al Consultation

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE APPLICATION WesPac Tilbury Marine Jetty Project ABORIGINAL ABORIGINAL : 0 . 12 CONSULTATION SECTION SECTION WesPac Tilbury Marine Jetty Project Environmental Assessment Certificate Application Part C – Aboriginal Consultation Section 12.0: Aboriginal Consultation 12.0 ABORIGINAL CONSULTATION Aboriginal Interests are defined in the Section 11 Order (BCEAO, 2015b) as asserted or determined Aboriginal rights, including title, and treaty rights. An overview of planned consultation activities for the Project, activities completed to date, and a description of Aboriginal Interests is provided in Section 12.1 Aboriginal Interests. The assessment of Project-related effects on those Aboriginal Interests is presented in Section 12.1.4 Potential Effects of the Project on Aboriginal Interests. Issues raised by Aboriginal groups that do not directly relate to Aboriginal Interests, such as those pertaining to potential adverse social, economic, heritage, or health effects, and proposed measures to address those effects, are described in Section 12.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups. The assessment of effects on Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups is also found in Section 12.2 Other Matters of Concern to Aboriginal groups. Section 12.3 provides the Issue Summary Table that summarizes Aboriginal Interests or other matters of concern to Aboriginal groups that may be affected by the Project, and the measures to avoid, mitigate or otherwise manage those effects. Information presented in this Application
  • CAA/ACA Bulletin

    CAA/ACA Bulletin

    CAA/ACA Bulletin Volume 22, Issue 1, Spring 2002 A Message from the President. Un Message du Président. Gerry Oetelaar This is my last message as president of Voici mon dernier message comme président de the association and the content is any- lassociation et le contenu nest pas très agréable. thing but uplifting. In her final com- Lors de son discours final, il y a quelques années, munication as president a couple of Mima nous a indiqué que sa contribution principale years ago, Mima justifiably summa- comme présidente était de placer les affaires de rized her single most important con- lassociation en ordre. Je minquiète que ma contri- tribution as getting the CAAs house bution envers lassociation ces dernières années sera in order. I am afraid that my contri- vue comme linverse. Malgré mes intentions les plus bution to the association will be viewed as the sincères, jai vu les affaires sécrouler devant mes Association exact opposite. Despite the best of intentions, I yeux - ladhésion des membres est demeurée la News have watched the house collapse around me - même, lassemblée annuelle 2002 a du changer de membership has remained un- le lieu de réunion à la dernière seconde, Issue changed, the 2002 conference et récemment notre demande de changed venues at the last minute, “It is with bourse a été reniée. Chacuns de ces and, most recently, our grant appli- regret that I points a une implication financière cation was rejected. Each of these auprès de lassociation, mais jaimerais has serious financial repercussions must inform me concentrer sur notre demande de for the Canadian Archaeological As- you that the bourse.
  • Canadian Airmen Lost in Wwii by Date 1943

    Canadian Airmen Lost in Wwii by Date 1943

    CANADA'S AIR WAR 1945 updated 21/04/08 January 1945 424 Sqn. and 433 Sqn. begin to re-equip with Lancaster B.I & B.III aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). 443 Sqn. begins to re-equip with Spitfire XIV and XIVe aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). Helicopter Training School established in England on Sikorsky Hoverfly I helicopters. One of these aircraft is transferred to the RCAF. An additional 16 PLUTO fuel pipelines are laid under the English Channel to points in France (Oxford). Japanese airstrip at Sandakan, Borneo, is put out of action by Allied bombing. Built with forced labour by some 3,600 Indonesian civilians and 2,400 Australian and British PoWs captured at Singapore (of which only some 1,900 were still alive at this time). It is decided to abandon the airfield. Between January and March the prisoners are force marched in groups to a new location 160 miles away, but most cannot complete the journey due to disease and malnutrition, and are killed by their guards. Only 6 Australian servicemen are found alive from this group at the end of the war, having escaped from the column, and only 3 of these survived to testify against their guards. All the remaining enlisted RAF prisoners of 205 Sqn., captured at Singapore and Indonesia, died in these death marches (Jardine, wikipedia). On the Russian front Soviet and Allied air forces (French, Czechoslovakian, Polish, etc, units flying under Soviet command) on their front with Germany total over 16,000 fighters, bombers, dive bombers and ground attack aircraft (Passingham & Klepacki). During January #2 Flying Instructor School, Pearce, Alberta, closes (http://www.bombercrew.com/BCATP.htm).
  • Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1St, 2021

    Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1St, 2021

    Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1st, 2021 The January 1st snow survey is now complete. Data from 58 manual snow courses and 86 automated snow weather stations around the province (collected by the Ministry of Environment Snow Survey Program, BC Hydro and partners), and climate data from Environment and Climate Change Canada and the provincial Climate Related Monitoring Program have been used to form the basis of the following report1. Weather October began with relatively warm and dry conditions, but a major cold spell dominated the province in mid-October. Temperatures primarily ranged from -1.5 to +1.0˚C compared to normal. The cold spell also produced early season low elevation snowfall for the Interior. Following the snowfall, heavy rain from an atmospheric river affected the Central Coast and spilled into the Cariboo, resulting in prolonged flood conditions. Overall, most of the Interior received above normal precipitation for the month, whereas coastal regions were closer to normal. In November, temperatures were steady at near normal to slightly above normal and primarily ranged from -0.5 to +1.5˚C through the province. The warmest temperatures relative to normal occurred in the Interior, while the coldest occurred in the Northwest. Precipitation was mostly below normal to near normal (35-105%) with the Northeast / Peace as the driest areas. A few locations, e.g. Prince Rupert and Williams Lake, were above 130% due to a strong storm event early in the month. Temperatures in December were relatively warm across the province, ranging from +1.0 to +5.0˚C above normal.
  • Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program

    Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program

    Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program Implementation Year 8 Reference: WAHWORKS #2 Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 Study Period: 2013-2014 Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch December 2015 WAHLEACH RESERVOIR NUTRIENT RESTORATION PROJECT, 2013-2014 by A.S. Hebert1, S.L. Harris1, T. Weir2, M.B. Davies, and A. Schellenberg 1Ministry of Environment, Conservation Science Section, 315 - 2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 2Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations, Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Management Branch, 4th Floor - 2975 Jutland Road, Victoria, BC V8T 5J9 Fisheries Project Report No. RD153 2015 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch Copyright Notice No part of the content of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including storage, reproduction, execution, or transmission without the prior written permission of the Province of British Columbia. Limited Exemption to Non-reproduction Permission to copy and use this publication in part, or in its entirety, for non-profit purposes within British Columbia, is granted to BC Hydro; and Permission to distribute this publication, in its entirety, is granted to BC Hydro for non-profit purposes of posting the publication on a publicly accessible area of the BC Hydro website. Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 ii Data and information contained within this data report are considered preliminary and subject to change. Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 iii Acknowledgements This project was completed by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation Science Section under a Memorandum of Understanding with BC Hydro.
  • Copyright (C) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    Copyright (C) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    B.C. Reg. 38/2016 O.C. 112/2016 Deposited February 29, 2016 effective February 29, 2016 Water Sustainability Act WATER DISTRICTS REGULATION Note: Check the Cumulative Regulation Bulletin 2015 and 2016 for any non-consolidated amendments to this regulation that may be in effect. Water districts 1 British Columbia is divided into the water districts named and described in the Schedule. Schedule Water Districts Alberni Water District That part of Vancouver Island together with adjacent islands lying southwest of a line commencing at the northwest corner of Fractional Township 42, Rupert Land District, being a point on the natural boundary of Fisherman Bay; thence in a general southeasterly direction along the southwesterly boundaries of the watersheds of Dakota Creek, Laura Creek, Stranby River, Nahwitti River, Quatse River, Keogh River, Cluxewe River and Nimpkish River to the southeasterly boundary of the watershed of Nimpkish River; thence in a general northeasterly direction along the southeasterly boundary of the watershed of Nimpkish River to the southerly boundary of the watershed of Salmon River; thence in a general easterly direction along the southerly boundary of the watershed of Salmon River to the southwesterly boundary thereof; thence in a general southeasterly direction along the southwesterly boundaries of the watersheds of Salmon River and Campbell River to the southerly boundary of the watershed of Campbell River; thence in a general easterly direction along the southerly boundaries of the watersheds of Campbell River and
  • Reduced Annualreport1972.Pdf

    Reduced Annualreport1972.Pdf

    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND CONSERVATION HON. ROBERT A. WILLIAMS, Minister LLOYD BROOKS, Deputy Minister REPORT OF THE Department of Recreation and Conservation containing the reports of the GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH, PROVINCIAL PARKS BRANCH, BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCIAL MUSEUM, AND COMMERCIAL FISHERIES BRANCH Year Ended December 31 1972 Printed by K. M. MACDONALD, Printer to tbe Queen's Most Excellent Majesty in right of the Province of British Columbia. 1973 \ VICTORIA, B.C., February, 1973 To Colonel the Honourable JOHN R. NICHOLSON, P.C., O.B.E., Q.C., LLD., Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: Herewith I beg respectfully to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1972. ROBERT A. WILLIAMS Minister of Recreation and Conservation 1_) VICTORIA, B.C., February, 1973 The Honourable Robert A. Williams, Minister of Recreation and Conservation. SIR: I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1972. LLOYD BROOKS Deputy Minister of Recreation and Conservation CONTENTS PAGE Introduction by the Deputy Minister of Recreation and Conservation_____________ 7 General Administration_________________________________________________ __ ___________ _____ 9 Fish and Wildlife Branch____________ ___________________ ________________________ _____________________ 13 Provincial Parks Branch________ ______________________________________________
  • Greenspace Plan 2018 Iii City of Chilliwack List of Maps

    Greenspace Plan 2018 Iii City of Chilliwack List of Maps

    Park Operations Greenspace Plan Updated June 2018 Salmon Ridge Loop Trail (Image © City of Chilliwack, 2017) Table of Contents List of Maps iv Section 3: Conclusions 35 List of Tables iv Opportunities 35 Abbreviations v Local Government Act 35 Definitions v Riparian Areas Regulation 36 Executive Summary vi City of Chilliwack Official Community Plan Section 1: Introduction 1 (OCP) 37 The Value of Greenspace 1 City of Chilliwack Zoning Bylaw 37 The Function of Parks 2 Subdivision Development and Control Bylaw Chilliwack’s Parks and Trails: A Brief History 2 2004, No. 3055 38 Where Is Our Greenspace? 4 Development Cost Charge Bylaw 38 Visions, Goals and Objectives 4 Utility Lots and Corridors 38 Park Servicing Guidelines 9 Acceptance of Residual Non-Developable Section 2: Greenspace Analysis 10 Lands at Time of Subdivision 39 Park Hierarchy 10 Trail Development Within Transportation Provincial Parks 10 Corridors 39 Regional Parks 10 Crown Grants of Parkland 39 Community Parks 12 Land Purchase and Exchange 40 Community Park Opportunities 14 Donation of Land 40 Sub-Community Parks and Facilities 15 Trail Development Within Abandoned or Sub-Community Park Opportunities 18 Little-Used Transportation Corridors 40 Neighbourhood Parks and Sub-Neighbourhood Paying for the Development of a Park or Trail 40 Parks 18 Greenspace Plan Implementation 2014–2018 41 Neigbourhood Park Analysis 23 Summary 42 Neighbourhood Park Opportunities 32 References 43 Outdoor Recreation Facilities 34 Appendix A: The Legislation 44 Local Government Act Parkland Dedication
  • A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)

    A GUIDE to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013)

    A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) A GUIDE TO Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia (December 2013) INTRODUCTORY NOTE A Guide to Aboriginal Organizations and Services in British Columbia is a provincial listing of First Nation, Métis and Aboriginal organizations, communities and community services. The Guide is dependent upon voluntary inclusion and is not a comprehensive listing of all Aboriginal organizations in B.C., nor is it able to offer links to all the services that an organization may offer or that may be of interest to Aboriginal people. Publication of the Guide is coordinated by the Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation (MARR), to support streamlined access to information about Aboriginal programs and services and to support relationship-building with Aboriginal people and their communities. Information in the Guide is based upon data available at the time of publication. The Guide data is also in an Excel format and can be found by searching the DataBC catalogue at: http://www.data.gov.bc.ca. NOTE: While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy and validity of the information, we have been experiencing some technical challenges while updating the current database. Please contact us if you notice an error in your organization’s listing. We would like to thank you in advance for your patience and understanding as we work towards resolving these challenges. If there have been any changes to your organization’s contact information please send the details to: Intergovernmental and Community Relations Branch Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation PO Box 9100 Stn Prov.
  • Better for Business • Better for Life Chilliwack

    Better for Business • Better for Life Chilliwack

    BETTER FOR BUSINESS • BETTER FOR LIFE CHILLIWACK COMMUNITY PROFILE Attracting and Facilitating Economic Growth This Community Profile has been produced by the TABLE OF CONTENTS Chilliwack Economic Partners Corporation (CEPCO), THIS DOCUMENT IS HYPERLINKED FOR EASY NAVIGATION. the organization responsible for the City of Chilliwack’s economic growth. CEPCO’s primary role includes: OVERVIEW ............................................. 3 ECONOMICS ......................................... 30 • ADVANTAGES ......................................... 4 • LIVING COSTS ........................................ 31 • Assisting businesses with expansion and relocation • LOCATION .............................................. 5 • BUSINESS COSTS ..................................... 32 • CLIMATE ................................................ 6 • BUSINESS LICENCES ................................ 33 • QUALITY OF LIFE ..................................... 7 • INCOME & INSURANCE ........................... 34 • Marketing Chilliwack as an appealing destination for • DEVELOPMENT COSTS ............................. 35 business and investment DEMOGRAPHICS ................................... 8 • TAXATION ............................................. 36 • POPULATION ........................................... 9 • Working to maintain and create local employment • HOUSEHOLDS ......................................... 10 DEVELOPMENT .................................... 37 • LANGUAGE & ETHNICITY ......................... 11 • HIGHLIGHTS .........................................
  • Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students

    Understanding Our Lives Middle Years Development Instrumentfor 2019–2020 Survey of Grade 7 Students

    ONLY USE UNDERSTANDING OUR LIVES MIDDLE YEARS DEVELOPMENT INSTRUMENTFOR 2019–2020 SURVEY OF GRADE 7 STUDENTS BRITISH COLUMBIA You can preview the survey online at INSTRUCTIONALSAMPLE SURVEY www.mdi.ubc.ca. NOT © Copyright of UBC and contributors. Copying, distributing, modifying or translating this work is expressly forbidden by the copyright holders. Contact Human Early Learning Partnership at [email protected] to obtain copyright permissions. Version: Sep 13, 2019 H18-00507 IMPORTANT REMINDERS! 1. Prior to starting the survey, please read the Student Assent on the next page aloud to your students! Students must be given the opportunity to decline and not complete the survey. Students can withdraw anytime by clicking the button at the bottom of every page. 2. Each student has their own login ID and password assigned to them. Students need to know that their answers are confidential, so that they will feel more comfortable answering the questions honestly. It is critical that they know this is not a test, and that there are no right or wrong answers. 3. The “Tell us About Yourself” section at the beginning of the survey can be challenging for some students. Please read this section aloud to make sure everybody understands. You know your students best and if you are concerned about their reading level, we suggest you read all of the survey questions aloud to your students. 4. The MDI takes about one to two classroom periods to complete.ONLY The “Activities” section is a natural place to break. USE Thank you! What’s new on the MDI? 1. We have updated questions 5-7 on First Nations, Métis and Inuit identity, and First Nations languages learned and spoken at home.