DOCSLIB.ORG

CAA/ACA Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CAA/ACA Bulletin Volume 22, Issue 1, Spring 2002 A Message from the President. Un Message du Président. Gerry Oetelaar This is my last message as president of Voici mon dernier message comme président de the association and the content is any- lassociation et le contenu nest pas très agréable. thing but uplifting. In her final com- Lors de son discours final, il y a quelques années, munication as president a couple of Mima nous a indiqué que sa contribution principale years ago, Mima justifiably summa- comme présidente était de placer les affaires de rized her single most important con- lassociation en ordre. Je minquiète que ma contri- tribution as getting the CAAs house bution envers lassociation ces dernières années sera in order. I am afraid that my contri- vue comme linverse. Malgré mes intentions les plus bution to the association will be viewed as the sincères, jai vu les affaires sécrouler devant mes Association exact opposite. Despite the best of intentions, I yeux - ladhésion des membres est demeurée la News have watched the house collapse around me - même, lassemblée annuelle 2002 a du changer de membership has remained un- le lieu de réunion à la dernière seconde, Issue changed, the 2002 conference et récemment notre demande de changed venues at the last minute, “It is with bourse a été reniée. Chacuns de ces and, most recently, our grant appli- regret that I points a une implication financière cation was rejected. Each of these auprès de lassociation, mais jaimerais has serious financial repercussions must inform me concentrer sur notre demande de for the Canadian Archaeological As- you that the bourse. sociation but I want to dedicate adjudication Comme vous le savez, lassociation most of this message to the grant canadienne darchéologie a, depuis proposal. committee, plusieurs années maintenant, fait une As many of you may or which re- demande de bourse auprès du Conseil may not know, the Canadian Ar- viewed and des Recherches en Sciences Humaines chaeological Association has, for pour subventionner la rédaction du some time now, applied for and re- scored your Journal Canadien dArchéologie. Tous ceived a grant from the Social Sci- application, les trois ans, les membres de lexécutif ences and Humanities Research did not recom- et la rédactrice/le rédacteur du journal Council of Canada to help defray font une demande de bourse auprès the costs of publishing the Cana- mend a Gen- du concours Aide aux revues de re- dian Journal of Archaeology. Every eral Grant for cherche et de transfert administré par three years, members of the execu- le Conseil des Recherches en Sciences tive and the editor of the journal your journal.” Humaines. Lassociation a reçu la apply for this grant through the Aid dernière bourse en 1998 et nous Editor: to Research and Transfer Journals Program ad- avons fait notre demande auprès du CRSH en juin, A. Martindale McMaster University ministered by SSHRC. The association received 2001. Pour cette compétition, Butch Amundson, Dept. of Anthropology its last grant in 1998 and applied for a similar George Nicholas, et moi avons fait une demande de 1280 Main St. W. contribution from SSHRC in the spring of 2001. bourse générale denviron 6088,68$ pour chacunes Hamilton, ON L8S 4L9 (905) 525-9140 ext. 23910 In the most recent competition, Butch des trois années du programme. Ce printemps, nous Fax: (905) 522-5993 Amundson, George Nicholas and I applied for a étions tous trois sur le terrain mais, malgré cet www.canadianarchaeology.com [email protected] ISSN 0824-1945 Page 1 Bulletin CAA/ACA general grant equivalent to $6088.68 for each of inconvénient, nous avons pu préparer et poster notre the three years of the program. Even though all demande de bourse avant la date finale. three of us were in the field, we worked through Le 28 novembre, 2001, jai reçu une lettre de M. Yves May and June to compile the required information. Mougeot mindiquant que notre demande de bourse était Although the process was a nail-biter at times, refusée. En vu de notre succès au concours 1998, le CRSH we did manage to get the package together and nous donna une petite bourse pour lan 2002 mais aucun submitted before the deadline in late June. montant pour les deux années suivantes. Alors, cette décision On November 28, 2001, we received a letter from M. du CRSH nous donne une petite bourse pour subventionner Yves Mougeot informing us that our application for the grant la publication du journal en 2002 mais ne nous aide pas du was turned down. I would like to quote at length the words tout durant les années 2003 et 2004. En 2004, nous used by M. Mougeot so that the membership will know ex- pourrons faire une autre demande de subvention pourvu actly what the rejection entails. quon ait corrigé les problèmes identifiés par les membres du It is with regret that I must inform you that the adju- comité. dication committee, which reviewed and scored your Les points dans ce concours sont basés sur la qualité application, did not recommend a General Grant for (50%), la gestion (25%), la diffusion (15%), et la spécificité your journal. You will find enclosed a copy of the adju- ((10%) du journal. Nous avons reçu les notes suivantes: 36.3/ dication committee comments on your application as 50 pour la qualité du journal, 18.0/25 pour la gestion, 11.8/ well as a breakdown of the scores under each of the 15 pour la diffusion, 8.3/10 pour la spécificité. Afin de recevoir program scoring criteria. In accordance with program procedures, since your journal received a General Grant une bourse, le journal doit obtenir une note minimale de 75% in the 1998 competition, your journal will receive a ou 37.5/50 pour la qualité et au moins 70% (70/100) comme one-year termination grant in the amount of the third total. Evidemment, notre total est supérieur aux 70% requis year of the 1998 grant. Since the amounts recom- mais notre note pour la qualité est inférieur aux 75% mended by the committees exceed by 11.9% the amount nécessaires. Donc, nous navons pas reçu de bourse cette currently available for the first year of funding, the année parce que la qualité de notre journal est inférieur aux amount of your terminal grant will be reduced accord- autres journaux qui ont fait parti du concours. Les problèmes ingly. This grant will be paid from the Councils 2002- reconnus par les membres du comité sont très intéressants, 2003 fiscal year. A grant notification sheet will follow surtout par rapport au journal. Encore une fois, je vous before the end of March 2002 and the money will be demande de lire lextrait présenté dans le texte anglais. En fait, released as early as possible in April. M. Mougeot nous dit tout simplement de diriger plus defforts M. Mougeot also advised us to check the council website for pour améliorer la qualité de liconographie et daugmenter le program updates and to reapply for the 2004 competition. nombre darticles français dans ce journal bilingue. In essence then, this decision by SSHRC means that the Ca- La phrase a better quality of iconography ne se dit nadian Journal of Archaeology will receive a small grant for jamais en anglais, donc jai du minformer auprès des membres 2002 (our grant for 2001 minus 11.9%) but no funding for du comité pour identifier le problème. Tout dabord, jai 2003 or 2004. téléphoné à Mme Shirley Onn de luniversité de Calgary qui The scoring in this competition is based on the qual- mindiqua quil sagissait fort probablement dun problème ity (50%), management (25%), dissemination (15%), and de traduction. Dautre part, Mme Onn minforma aussi que specificity (10%) of the journal. We received 36.3/50 for qual- les membres du comité navait jamais discuté la qualité des ity, 18.0/25 for management, 11.8/15 for dissemination, and images ou des photographes dans les journaux. Donc, le 8.3/10 for specificity for a total score of 74.3/100. To receive président du comité avait sans doute autre chose en tête the grant, the journal must receive a minimum score of 75% lorsquil discuta la qualité de liconographie. (37.5/50) for quality and a minimum of 70% (70/100) in the Par la suite, jai contacté M. Rémy Tremblay et celui-ci total score. Clearly, our total score exceeded the minimum mindiqua que la qualité de liconographie se rapportait aux but our score on quality was below the minimal score re- images et aux photographies de la revue. En revoyant le quired for the grant. Thus, we did not receive the grant be- numéro 24 du journal (celui quon a inclu avec notre demande cause the quality of the journal supposedly was inferior to de subvention), jai constaté que beaucoup dimages nétaient others in the competition. The weaknesses or deficiencies iden- pas aussi claires que possible mais quelles ont été produites tified by the committee members are very interesting, espe- par ordinateur. De nos jours, les développements dans le cially in light of the nature of our journal. Again, it is worth domaine des ordinateurs se font si rapidement quil nest pas quoting at length from the letter by M. Mougeot: toujours possible dinclure les modifications aux illustrations The committee recognised the social rel- evance aspect of this journal and that it is sans avoir à subir des dépenses supplémentaire durant la pro- unique in this respect in Canada. However, it duction du journal. De plus, comme je lai indiqué à M.
Recommended publications
  • Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1St, 2021

    Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1St, 2021

    Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin – January 1st, 2021 The January 1st snow survey is now complete. Data from 58 manual snow courses and 86 automated snow weather stations around the province (collected by the Ministry of Environment Snow Survey Program, BC Hydro and partners), and climate data from Environment and Climate Change Canada and the provincial Climate Related Monitoring Program have been used to form the basis of the following report1. Weather October began with relatively warm and dry conditions, but a major cold spell dominated the province in mid-October. Temperatures primarily ranged from -1.5 to +1.0˚C compared to normal. The cold spell also produced early season low elevation snowfall for the Interior. Following the snowfall, heavy rain from an atmospheric river affected the Central Coast and spilled into the Cariboo, resulting in prolonged flood conditions. Overall, most of the Interior received above normal precipitation for the month, whereas coastal regions were closer to normal. In November, temperatures were steady at near normal to slightly above normal and primarily ranged from -0.5 to +1.5˚C through the province. The warmest temperatures relative to normal occurred in the Interior, while the coldest occurred in the Northwest. Precipitation was mostly below normal to near normal (35-105%) with the Northeast / Peace as the driest areas. A few locations, e.g. Prince Rupert and Williams Lake, were above 130% due to a strong storm event early in the month. Temperatures in December were relatively warm across the province, ranging from +1.0 to +5.0˚C above normal.
  • Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program

    Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program

    Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program Implementation Year 8 Reference: WAHWORKS #2 Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 Study Period: 2013-2014 Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch December 2015 WAHLEACH RESERVOIR NUTRIENT RESTORATION PROJECT, 2013-2014 by A.S. Hebert1, S.L. Harris1, T. Weir2, M.B. Davies, and A. Schellenberg 1Ministry of Environment, Conservation Science Section, 315 - 2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 2Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations, Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Management Branch, 4th Floor - 2975 Jutland Road, Victoria, BC V8T 5J9 Fisheries Project Report No. RD153 2015 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch Copyright Notice No part of the content of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including storage, reproduction, execution, or transmission without the prior written permission of the Province of British Columbia. Limited Exemption to Non-reproduction Permission to copy and use this publication in part, or in its entirety, for non-profit purposes within British Columbia, is granted to BC Hydro; and Permission to distribute this publication, in its entirety, is granted to BC Hydro for non-profit purposes of posting the publication on a publicly accessible area of the BC Hydro website. Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 ii Data and information contained within this data report are considered preliminary and subject to change. Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2013-2014 iii Acknowledgements This project was completed by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation Science Section under a Memorandum of Understanding with BC Hydro.
  • Food Web E.2. Electronic Appendix

    Food Web E.2. Electronic Appendix

    E.2. Electronic Appendix - Food Web Elements of the Fraser River Basin Upper River (above rkm 210) Food webs: Microbenthic algae (periphyton), detritus from riparian vegetation and littoral insects (especially midges) are key components supporting fish production in the mainstem upper Fraser and larger tributaries. Collector-gatherers (invertebrates feeding on fine particulate organic material) are the most abundant functional feeding group, making up to 85% of the invertebrate species on the latter two rivers. Smaller tributaries are dominated by collector, shredder and grazer insect feeding modes (Reece and Richardson 2000). There is a general increasing trend in insect abundance from the headwaters of the main river to the lower river (Reynoldson et al. 2005). Juvenile stream-type Chinook rear along the shorelines of the upper river and tributaries and some overwinter under ice as the river margins usually freeze over here. Juvenile Chinook diets in the main stem and tributaries include larval plecopterans, empheropterans, chironomids and terrestrial insects (Homoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Arachnida; Russell et al. 1983, Rogers et al. 1988, Levings and Lauzier 1991). Rainbow trout and northern pikeminnow consume mainly sculpins in the Nechako River as well as a variety of insects (Brown et al. 1992). Stressors: Water quality and habitat conditions have changed food webs in specific locations in the upper river. However, compared to other rivers in North America, water quality is good (Reynoldson et al. 2005), even with five pulp mills currently operating in the megareach. The food web of the Thompson River was stimulated in the past by low concentrations of bleached Kraft pulp mill effluent released into the river (Dube and Culp 1997); it is not known if this is still happening as treatment techniques for effluent have changed.
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland

    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland

    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland CONTACT INFORMATION Fish and Wildlife Regional Office Salmon Information: (604) 586-4400 200-10428 153 St Fisheries and Oceans Canada Surrey BC V3R 1E1 District Offices (DFO) Conservation Officer Service Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for recorded Delta: (604) 666-8266 information or to make an appointment at Langley: (604) 607-4150 any of the following Field Offices: Mission: (604) 814-1055 Mission, North Vancouver, Powell River, Squamish: (604) 892-3230 Sechelt, and Squamish Steveston: (604) 664-9250 Vancouver: (604) 666-0384 RAPP Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 Report All Poachers Rand Polluters Mahood L i C in hilco Conservation Officerl 24 Hour Hotline tin k na STAY UP TO DATE: li R R 1-877-952-RAPPK (7277) iver ko Canim il Check website for in-season changes or h L Please refer to page 78 for more informationC closure dates for the 2021-2023 season rapp.bc.ca g at: www.gov.bc.ca/FishingRegulations r T o Cr a D C s y e 100 Mile House 5-6 e Tatlayoko k l o s o Lake M R r C 5-5 r 5-3 C CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk Lakes ap at 5-4 3-31 on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n a R la k m o d m a R e Bish rd 3-32 D op o 2-15 L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r Bridge R Lake 1-15 2-14 Seton BUTE L INLET 3-33 Anderson Lillooet 3-17 KAMLOOPS Phillips 2-13 L G R u i a R N Arm b r c o I O T C V h L h S o ILL s E OO o R P n E T o M y a O C C H r 2-11 3-16 T Sonora N TOBA ic Island R o INLET Pemberton la n E i e R l n a t e
  • Peace River Regional District REPORT

    Peace River Regional District REPORT

    PEACE RIVER REGIONAL DISTRICT Emergency Executive Committee Meeting A G E N D A for the meeting to be held on Tuesday, February 7, 2017 in the Regional District offices, Dawson Creek, BC commencing at 1:00 pm Committee Chair: Director Goodings Vice-Chair: Director Rose 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ELECTION OF CHAIR / VICE-CHAIR: 3. NOTICE OF NEW BUSINESS: 4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: 5. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES: M-1 Emergency Executive Committee Meeting Minutes of June 21, 2016 6. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES: 7. CORRESPONDENCE: C-1 2017 Snow Survey and Water Supply Bulletin. C-2 January 25, 2017 National Energy Board – proposed changes to the Emergency Management filing requirements. 7. REPORTS: R-1 January 31, 2017 Emergency Services Budget. 8. NEW BUSINESS: 9. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION: I-1 November 6, 2016 UBCM – Emergency Program Act Review – Summary of input received from local governments. I-2 For Reference - “PRRD Emergency & Disaster Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1598, 2005” and “PRRD Emergency & Disaster Operations Bylaw No. 1599, 2005” I-3 Emergency Incident Register 10. ADJOURNMENT: PEACE RIVER REGIONAL DISTRICT EMERGENCY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES DATE: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 PLACE: Regional District Offices, Dawson Creek, BC PRESENT: Director Karen Goodings, Electoral Area ‘B’ – Meeting Chair Director Brad Sperling, Electoral Area ‘C’ Director Leonard Hiebert, Electoral Area ‘D’ Director Dan Rose, Electoral Area ‘E’ Director Dale Bumstead, City of Dawson Creek Chris Cvik, Chief Administrative Officer Staff Trish Morgan, General Manager of Community and Electoral Area Services Jill Rickert, Community Services Coordinator Suzanne Garrett, Corporate Services Coordinator 1) Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 1:05 pm ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: 2) Adoption of the MOVED by Director Bumstead, SECONDED by Director Hiebert, Agenda that the Emergency Executive Committee agenda for the June 21, 2016 meeting be adopted as follows: 1.
  • Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review

    Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review

    Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review Lower Fraser Valley Stream Review, Vol. 1 Fraser River Action Plan Habitat and Enhnacement Branch Fisheries and Oceans Canada 360 - 555 W. Hastings St. Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 5G3 1999 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Lower Fraser Valley streams strategic review (Lower Fraser Valley stream reveiw : vol. 1) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-662-26167-4 Cat. no. Fs23-323/1-1997E 1. Stream conservation -- British Columbia --Fraser River Watershed. 2. Stream ecology -- British Columbia -- Fraser River Watershed. 3. Pacific salmon fisheries -- British Columbia --Fraser River Watershed. I. Precision Identification Biological Consultants. II. Fraser River Action Plan (Canada) III. Canada. Land Use Planning, Habitat and Enhancement Branch. IV. Series. QH541.5S7L681997 333.91’6216’097113 C97-980399-3 Strategic Review – Preface PREFACE The Lower Fraser Valley Streams Strategic Review provides an overview of the status and management issues on many of the salmon bearing streams in the Lower Fraser Valley. This information has been compiled to assist all concerned with Goals for Sustainable Fisheries managing and protecting this important public resource. Fisheries and Oceans Canada has This includes federal, provincial and local governments, identified seven measurable and achievable goals for sustainable community groups, and individuals. fisheries. These are as follows: While the federal government, specifically Fisheries and 1. Avoid irreversible human induced Oceans Canada, is responsible for managing fish and fish alterations to fish habitat. Alterations to fish habitat that reduce habitat (goals included in sidebar), this important public its capacity to produce fish resource is completely dependent upon land and water to populations which cannot be reversed within a human generation are to be produce and sustain its habitat base.
  • JONES CREEK - WAHLEACH LAKE WATERSHED ACTION PLAN FINAL November 14, 2017 Administrative Update August 28, 2020

    JONES CREEK - WAHLEACH LAKE WATERSHED ACTION PLAN FINAL November 14, 2017 Administrative Update August 28, 2020

    JONES CREEK - WAHLEACH LAKE WATERSHED ACTION PLAN FINAL November 14, 2017 Administrative Update August 28, 2020 The Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program is a partnership between BC Hydro, the Province of B.C., Fisheries and Oceans Canada, First Nations and Public Stakeholders to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife impacted by BC Hydro dams. From left: Wahleach Dam, Wahleach Dam and Reservoir (Credit BC Hydro). Cover photos: Black Bear caught on trail camera as part of 2016-17 project (Credit: Quercus Ecological), Western Toad (Credit: Quercus Ecological). The Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program (FWCP) is a partnership between BC Hydro, the Province of BC, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, First Nations and Public Stakeholders to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife impacted by BC Hydro dams. The FWCP funds projects within its mandate to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife in 14 watersheds that make up its Coastal Region. Learn more about the Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program, projects underway now, and how you can apply for a grant at fwcp.ca. Subscribe to our free email updates and annual newsletter at www.fwcp.ca/subscribe. Contact us anytime at [email protected]. 2 Jones Creek Wahleach Lake Action Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: WAHLEACH WATERSHED The Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program is partnership between BC Hydro, the Province of B.C., Fisheries and Oceans Canada, First Nations and Public Stakeholders to conserve and enhance fish and wildlife impacted by BC Hydro dams. This Action Plan builds on the Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program’s (FWCP’s) strategic objectives, and is an update to the previous FWCP Watershed and Action Plans.
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland the Management Unit Boundaries Indicated on the Map Below Are Shown Only As a Reference to Help Anglers Locate Waters in the Region

    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland the Management Unit Boundaries Indicated on the Map Below Are Shown Only As a Reference to Help Anglers Locate Waters in the Region

    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland The Management Unit boundaries indiCated on the map below are shown only as a referenCe to help anglers loCate waters in the region. For more preCise Management Unit boundaries, please Consult one of the CommerCial Recreational Atlases available for B.C. FOR SALMON INFORMATION Fisheries and Oceans Canada District Offices (DFO) Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Delta: (604) 666-8266 Fish and Wildlife Regional Office R.A.P.P. Langley: (604) 607-4150 (604) 586-4400 Report All Poachers and Polluters Mission: (604) 814-1055 200-10428 153 St Conservation Officer 24 Hour Hotline Squamish (604) 892-3230 Surrey BC V3R 1E1 1-877-952-RAPP (7277) Steveston (604) 664-9250 Cellular Dial #7277 Vancouver (604) 666-0384 Fraser Valley Trout Hatchery Please refer to page 94 for more information Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 (604) 504-4709 www.rapp.bc.ca 34345 Vye Rd Exotic Alert: Atlantic Salmon Abbotsford BC V2S 7P6 Please refer to the salmon section, p. 4 Conservation Officer Service REGION 2 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for reCorded information or to make an appointment at any of the following Field Offices: ChilliwaCk, Maple Ridge, North VanCouver, C r T r a D Powell River, Sechelt, C Surrey and Squamish s y e 5-6 k 100 Mile House e Tatlayoko l o s o Lake r M R C 5-5 5-3 Cr CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk 5-4 Lakes 3-31 ap at on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n l a R a k m o d m a 3-32 R e Bish rd D 2-15 op o L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r 1-15 2-14 Bridge
  • Prepared For

    Prepared For

    Volume 5D, ESA – Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Socio-Economic Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Traditional Land and Resource Use Technical Report Gathering Places Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members did not identify any gathering places during the TLU for the Project. No mitigation was requested for gathering places by Aseniwuche Winewak Nation. Sacred Sites Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members did not identify specific sacred sites during the TLU for the Project. Community members explained that the Hinton area is culturally important and presently used by Aseniwuche Winewak Nation community members, whereas the Valemount area is also culturally important, but not currently used. Community members did not expect to find sacred sites during ground reconnaissance due to extensive industrial development in Hinton and surrounding areas (Aseniwuche Environmental Corporation 2013). Aseniwuche Winewak Nation requested notification if culturally relevant sites are found during Project construction and that the sites are protected by a 100 m buffer. 5.2 Hargreaves to Darfield Segment The results of TLU studies conducted to date have identified TLU sites potentially affected by the Hargreaves to Darfield segment and associated Project components requiring mitigation. 5.2.1 Lheidli T’enneh Lheidli T’enneh elected to conduct a third-party TLU study for the Project. A third-party consultant, Chignecto Consulting Group conducted a map review, community interviews and ground reconnaissance that focused on Crown lands within the asserted traditional territory of Lheidli T’enneh. The findings of the TLU study have not been reviewed or approved by Lheidli T’enneh Chief and Council or community. The interim report is considered draft and any changes resulting from review with the Lheidli T’enneh community will be incorporated into the final report.
  • Draft Tilbury Project Description

    Draft Tilbury Project Description

    Tilbury Phase 2 LNG Expansion Project Initial Project Description February 2020 Initial Project Description List of Contributors to the Initial Project Description Contributors Credentials Section(s) Relevant Experience Todd Smith P.Eng. Section 2 (Project Overview) 20+ years experience in engineering, construction and business development for energy projects and utilities Ian Finke P.Eng., MBA Section 2 (Project Overview) 20+ years experience in engineering and business development for various industries Olivia Stanley MA, Public Policy Section 11 (Engagement and 6 years of Indigenous Consultation with Indigenous engagement experience Groups) Courtney Hodson BBA Section 12 (Engagement and 4 years of Stakeholder Consultation with engagement experience Governments, the Public and other Parties) Lynne Chalmers M.Sc., Conservation Ecology All 11 years of experience writing environmental impact assessments for oil and gas projects Carmen Holschuh M.Sc., R.P.Bio. All 15 years of BC and oil and gas regulatory experience Tara Lindsay B.Sc., RPP, P.Ag. All 12 years of BC and oil and gas regulatory experience Mike Climie B.Sc., R.P.Bio., P.Biol. Section 10 (Environmental, 12 years of BC and oil and Economic, Social, Heritage gas regulatory experience and Health Effects) Andy Smith M.Sc., R.P.Bio., P.Biol. Section 10 (Environmental, 20+ years of experience in Economic, Social, Heritage ecology and Health Effects) GES0529191019VBC i Initial Project Description Contents List of Contributors to the Initial Project Description .............................................................................
  • DISTRICT of VANDERHOOF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 14, 2017 5:30 Pm

    DISTRICT of VANDERHOOF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 14, 2017 5:30 Pm

    DISTRICT OF VANDERHOOF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 14, 2017 5:30 pm Page 1. AGENDA 1.1 February 14, 2017 Regular Council Meeting Agenda Recommendation That the February 14, 2017 Regular Council Meeting Agenda be adopted. 2. MINUTES 2.1 January 23, 2017 Regular Council Meeting minutes 4-74-74-74-7 Recommendation That the January 23, 2017 Regular Council Meeting minutes be adopted as printed. 2.2 January 9, 2017 Regular Council Meeting minutes 8-128-128-128-12 Recoomendation That the January 9, 2017 Regular Council Meeting minutes be adopted as printed. 3. DELEGATIONS 3.1 COMFOR David Watt 3.2 Nechako Valley Historical Society Tom Bulmer and Anne Davidson Progressive Employment 3.3 Aash Talwar 4. COMMITTEE REPORTS 4.1 Council Reports 4.2 Receipt of Council and Committee Reports Recommendation That the verbal and written Council and Committee reports be received. 5. PUBLIC QUESTIONS ON AGENDA ITEMS 6. CORRESPONDENCE 6.A CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION 6.A1 December 2016 RCMP Statistics Report 13131313 PagePPagagageP 1 of 82e 82 Page 6.A CORRESPONDENCE FOR DISCUSSION 6.A2 March 2017 Nutrition Month 14 6.A3 Tumbler Ridge - CN rail line 15-16 6.A4 Coastal Gaslink Pipeline Project Extension Application 17-21 6.B CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION 6.B1 Incoming Correspondence 22-60 6.B1 Outgoing Correspondence 61 6.B1 Receipt of Correspondence for Information Recommendation That the Correspondence for Information be received and filed. 7. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 7.1 Authorized Expense Reports 62-64 Recommendation That the January 2017 authorized expense reports be accepted. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9.
  • December 2013

    December 2013

    Wahleach Project Water Use Plan Wahleach Reservoir Fertilization Program Implementation Year 7 Reference: WAHWORKS-2 Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project Study Period: 2011 - 2012 By: A.S. Hebert, S.L. Harris, T. Weir, L. Vidmanic, and N.E. Down Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch Conservation Science Section 315 - 2202 Main Mall University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 December 2013 WAHLEACH RESERVOIR NUTRIENT RESTORATION PROJECT, 2011-2012 by A.S. Hebert1, S.L. Harris1, T. Weir2, L. Vidmanic3, and N.E. Down1 1Ministry of Environment, Conservation Science Section, 315 - 2202 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 2Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations, Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Management Branch, 4th Floor - 2975 Jutland Road, Victoria, BC V8T 5J9 3Limno Lab Ltd. 506-2260 W 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC V6K 2H8 Fisheries Project Report No. RD145 2013 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Environment Ecosystems Protection & Sustainability Branch Copyright Notice No part of the content of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including storage, reproduction, execution, or transmission without the prior written permission of the Province of British Columbia. Limited Exemption to Non-reproduction Permission to copy and use this publication in part, or in its entirety, for non-profit purposes within British Columbia, is granted to BC Hydro; and Permission to distribute this publication, in its entirety, is granted to BC Hydro for non-profit purposes of posting the publication on a publicly accessible area of the BC Hydro website. Wahleach Reservoir Nutrient Restoration Project, 2011-2012 2 Data and information contained within this data report are considered preliminary and subject to change.