DOCSLIB.ORG

Plasticity and Habit in the Thought of Catherine Malabou

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plasticity and Habit in the Thought of Catherine Malabou View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholarship@Western Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-22-2014 12:00 AM Sculpted Selves, Sculpted Worlds: Plasticity and Habit in the Thought of Catherine Malabou Thomas Wormald The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Chris Keep The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theory and Criticism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Thomas Wormald 2014 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Recommended Citation Wormald, Thomas, "Sculpted Selves, Sculpted Worlds: Plasticity and Habit in the Thought of Catherine Malabou" (2014). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 2398. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2398 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCULPTED SELVES, SCULPTED WORLDS: PLASTICITY AND HABIT IN THE THOUGHT OF CATHERINE MALABOU (Thesis format: Monograph) by Thomas Wormald Graduate Program in Theory and Criticism A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Thomas Wormald 2014 Abstract One of the contemporary trends marking our current moment in theory is the call for the elaboration of ‘new’ materialisms. The new materialisms, however, have taken two principal articulations: a Neo-Spinozist materialism read through the work of Gilles Deleuze, represented by thinkers such as Elizabeth Grosz, Jane Bennett and William Connolly and a Neo-Hegelian materialism read through Jacques Lacan, represented by figures Alain Badiou, Slavoj Žižek and Adrian Johnston. Concomitant with this return of materialism has been a resurgence in the topic of habit as a topic worthy of philosophical investigation. There is, however a division in the treatment of habit between the two camps. Habit is deemed positive by the vitalist materialisms influenced by Spinoza and Deleuze – illustrating the self’s continuity and openness to the outside – but neglected by the Neo-Hegelian materialisms of Badiou, Žižek and Johnston as an instance of the political quietism of the ‘micropolitical’. Contemporary French philosopher Catherine Malabou, typically associated with the figures of the Neo-Hegelian camp, elaborates a different materialism based on the principle of plasticity developed through not Hegel and Lacan, but Hegel and Heidegger and thus sits liminally between the two dominant materialist orientations. This thesis will elaborate Malabou’s ontology of plasticity and argue how a reading of habit through Malabou’s plastic rapprochement of Hegel-Heidegger offers a different perspective on habit as a critical ethico- political modality that can helpfully negotiate some of the binaries or impasses that mark contemporary ongoing debates in the interrelated fields of ontology and political theory Keywords Catherine Malabou, plasticity, habit, materialism, ontology, Hegel, Heidegger, subjectivity, politics, affect ii Acknowledgments To the Centre and SSHRC, I am grateful for the faith you have shown in me, providing me with the opportunity to pursue my research. Melanie, thank you for everything you do. You make many of our lives so much easier, often at the expense of making yours harder for you. To Elaine, thank you for making me first realize that thinking matters and that the distance between the page and one’s life does not have to be a distance at all. But, it is precarious and infinitely difficult task to take care of keeping that space as small as one can. I’ve tried, remembering you, to do that here. To Chris, I thank you for your guidance, seemingly endless encouragement and for your patience in our conversations throughout this process. When I wanted to try and do everything, you gave me the rope to do so. When I tangled myself up with it and felt lost, you told me I could find my way out. Thank you for insisting that what I most needed to do was get out of my own way. Hopefully this bears out that I have – at least a little bit. To my friends, if you read this, and see yourselves here, it’s because you are: much of this was written in conversation with – and, probably to my fault, more accurately, speaking at - all of you. For every graciously lent ear over every bent elbow, I’ve been inspired, grateful and lucky to spend my time. Mom and Dad, I could try to say thank you, but it would never be enough. And, lastly, to Sea: your patience with me borders on beatitude. iii Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv List of Abbreviated Titles ................................................................................................... v Introduction ........................................................................................................................ vi Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................. 1 1 Plasticity ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Catherine Malabou Beyond Neuroplasticity ........................................................... 3 1.2 Malabou’s New Materialism: Against Transcendent(s) ....................................... 11 1.3 ‘The Systemic Law of the Deconstructed Real’: Plasticity as the Sublation of Material Being ...................................................................................................... 18 1.4 Neuroplasticity as Expression of the Ontological Real ........................................ 38 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................... 48 2 Habit ............................................................................................................................. 48 2.1 Habit as the Sculpting of Plasticity ....................................................................... 50 2.2 Habit in Philosophy of Mind: Passive Reception of Form in the Habituation of the Body ...................................................................................................................... 54 2.3 Hegel, Heidegger and the Passive Reception of Social Form: Habit and World . 60 2.4 Habit in the Active Sculpting of Self and World: Putting Plasticity to Work ...... 70 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 83 Works Cited ...................................................................................................................... 90 Curriculum Vitae .............................................................................................................. 94 iv List of Abbreviated Titles Catherine Malabou: Changing Difference: The Feminine and the Question of Philosophy – CD “Conversation with Catherine Malabou” (2008) – “CWM” Ontology of the Accident: An Essay on Destructive Plasticity - OA Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction – PDW Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience - SEL The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, Dialectic – FH The Heidegger Change: On the Fantastic in Philosophy – HC The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain Damage - NW What Should We Do with Our Brain? – WB G.W.F. Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit - PS The Philosophy of Mind - PM The Philosophy of Right - PR v Introduction One of the contemporary trends marking our current moment in theory is the call for the elaboration of ‘new’ materialisms. If Edmund Husserl’s famous dictate was a return to things themselves, the mid to late twentieth in France a return to language itself, the call to return to culture itself in the eighties and nineties in North America, the present moment is punctuated by exhortations to return to the world or matter itself. This turn is precipitated by a uniformly admitted exhaustion with previously existing dominant textually and culturally oriented theoretical practices that failed to, as proponents of these new paradigms suggest, sufficiently attend to the agency or independence of materiality itself. It is also arguably occasioned by the slow-setting melancholia of processing the various deaths we have witnessed in the past century: the death of God, the death of the Subject, the death of Metanarratives, the death of Communism. The return to materialism occurring today may be an indication of our actual acceptance, registering and working through how to adequately conceptualize existence in an immanent real bereft of transcendent certainty. The twofold difficulty that accompanies such a characterization is, however, the rather conflicting array of claimants propounding their own specific variety of ‘materialism’ and, attendently,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catherine Malabou's Plasticity in Translation
    Document généré le 27 sept. 2021 20:02 TTR Traduction, terminologie, rédaction Catherine Malabou’s Plasticity in Translation Le concept de plasticité chez Catherine Malabou, appliqué à la traduction Carolyn Shread Du système en traduction : approches critiques Résumé de l'article On Systems in Translation: Critical Approaches En traduisant La plasticité au soir de l’écriture. Dialectique, destruction, Volume 24, numéro 1, 1er semestre 2011 déconstruction (2005) de Catherine Malabou en vue de l’édition anglaise de 2009, j’ai été frappée de constater à quel point son concept de plasticité pouvait URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013257ar être utile pour repenser les notions conventionnelles en traduction. Dans cette DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1013257ar autobiographie philosophique, qui décrit ses rencontres avec Hegel, Heidegger, et Derrida, Malabou introduit « la plasticité » en suggérant que cette notion, plus contemporaine, pourrait remplacer la conception d’écriture comme Aller au sommaire du numéro schème moteur de Derrida. Après avoir revu et explicité les réflexions innovatrices de Derrida sur la traduction, j’avance que les pouvoirs de donner, de recevoir, d’exploser et de régénérer la forme qui sont décrits par la Éditeur(s) plasticité modifient la modification et altèrent ainsi la transformation qu’est la traduction. Pour adapter le concept philosophique de Malabou à la Association canadienne de traductologie traductologie, j’établis une distinction entre la traduction élastique et la traduction plastique, ce qui me permet de faire voler en éclats les paradigmes ISSN d’équivalence, qui depuis si longtemps restreignent la théorie et la pratique de 0835-8443 (imprimé) la traduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Catherine Malabou's Plasticity in Translation
    Document generated on 10/03/2021 12:25 p.m. TTR Traduction, terminologie, rédaction Catherine Malabou’s Plasticity in Translation Le concept de plasticité chez Catherine Malabou, appliqué à la traduction Carolyn Shread Du système en traduction : approches critiques Article abstract On Systems in Translation: Critical Approaches Translating Catherine Malabou’s La Plasticité au soir de l’écriture: Dialectique, Volume 24, Number 1, 1er semestre 2011 destruction, déconstruction (2005) for its 2009 English publication, I was struck by how suggestive Malabou’s concept of plasticity is for a reworking of URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1013257ar conventional notions of translation. In this philosophical autobiography of her DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1013257ar encounters with Hegel, Heidegger, and Derrida, Malabou introduces “plasticity,” suggesting that the more contemporary notion of plasticity supersede Derrida’s proposal of writing as motor scheme. Reviewing and See table of contents developing Derrida’s innovative discussions of translation, this article argues that the giving, receiving, exploding, and regenerating of form described by plasticity changes change, and therefore alters the transformation that is Publisher(s) translation. Adapting Malabou’s philosophical concept to the field of translation studies, I make a distinction between elastic translation and plastic Association canadienne de traductologie translation, which allows us to break free of paradigms of equivalence that have for so long constrained translation theories and practice. While plasticity ISSN drives Malabou’s philosophical intervention in relation to identity and gender, 0835-8443 (print) it also enables a productive reconceptualization of translation, one which not 1708-2188 (digital) only privileges seriality and generativity over narratives of nostalgia for a lost original, but which also forges connections across different identity discourses on translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists By
    Review Reviewed Work(s): Self-consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists by Simon LUMSDEN Review by: Michael Baur Source: The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 69, No. 2 (DECEMBER 2015), pp. 395-397 Published by: Philosophy Education Society Inc. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636496 Accessed: 21-10-2019 12:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Philosophy Education Society Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Metaphysics This content downloaded from 150.108.161.119 on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:56:09 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms SUMMARIES AND COMMENTS 395 these other philosophers more clearly than they did themselves. What is more, he also develops those ideas further than anyone else I can think of, adding his own insights as he goes along. The result is a coherent and compelling defense of second-orderism. I would certainly recommend this book to any philosopher interested in ontological commitment or second-order logic, and given its clarity, I would recommend Part II to students as well. —Robert Trueman, Robinson College, Cambridge LUMSDEN, Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December
    ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December Postgraduate/Early Career Researcher Day: 356 North Wing, Arts West 12.30-1.00 Registration 1.00-2.00 Grant adventures: The ups and downs of the grant process Knox Peden Christopher Mayes Louise Richardson-Self 2.00-3.00 Afternoon Tea 3.00-4.00 Philosophy pathways: What you can do and how you can get there Jack Reynolds Ross Barham Rachel Joy 4.00-4.30 Break 4.30-5.30 Publishing without perishing: Publication tips Marguerite La Caze Andrew Inkpin Daniel Lopez Public Lecture B117 Glyn Davies Building/Melbourne School of Design (free, no registrations required) 7.30-8.30 Martin Hägglund This Life: Why Mortality Makes Us Free ASCP 2019 Program – Wednesday 4 December 8.15-8.45 Registration 8.45-10.30 Welcome to Country: Aunty Di. Conference Opening: Prof. Margaret Cameron (Head of School, SHAPS, University of Melbourne) Keynote ‐ Rebecca Comay, ‘Deadlines (literally)’ 10.30-11.00 Morning Tea Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 9 Room 10 11.00-12.30 Thematic Panel: Thematic Panel: Janice Richardson Anya Daly John Cleary What Joeri Mol Leonard D’Cruz Steven Churchill “It is George Duke Book Panel: Jon Religion and the Hegel and French Spinoza, Locke, and The Declaration of is an Idea? Plato's Organizing Space: The Methodological stupid to confuse the Political Romanticism Roffe, ed., The Limits of Reason in Philosophy the Influence Industry Interdependence!: theory of Subjectivity and the Significance of moral and the Works of Gilles the Early and Late Feminism, grounding participation
    [Show full text]
  • International Philosophical Quarterly
    International Philosophical Quarterly VOL. XL, No. 1 Issue No. 157 March 2000 ARTICLES Presenting Our Authors 3 Demons, Psychopaths, and the Formation of Consciences Hayden Ramsay 5 Anne Conway's Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes Jennifer McRobert 21 Neither Deconstruction nor Reconstruction: Metaphysics and the Intimate Strangeness of Being William Desmond 37 Dasein Comes after the Episternic Subject, But Who Is Dasein? Mariana Ortega 51 Reading, Imagination, and Interpretation: A Ricoeurian Response Mark S. Muldoon 69 A Subject for Hegel's Logic Simon Lumsden 85 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Galen, On Antecedent Causes-ed. and trans. R. J. Hankinson Robert J Penella 101 What We Owe to Each Other-T. M. Scanlon Peter Vallentyne 102 Puzzles for the Will: Fatalism, Newcomb and Samarra, Determinism and Omniscience-Jordan Howard Sobel Bruce A. Aune 103 The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson- ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn Dorothy Grover 105 Plato's Sophist-Martin Heidegger Daniel R. Ahem 107 Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves-Rae Langton David Carr 109 Dispositions-Stephen Mumford Rom Harre 110 (cont' d.) Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg Dilemma-Ernest Gellner H. 0. Mounce 112 Mind in Action-Bede Rundle David R. Cerbone 114 Providence and the Problem of Evil­ Richard Swinburne W. Matthews Grant 115 An Introduction to African Philosophy- Samuel Oluoch Imbo F. Ochieng-Odhiambo 117 Plato's Dream of Sophistry-Richard Marback Giles Hibbert, O. P. 120 Method in Ancient Philosophy-ed. Jyl Gentzler Daryl M. Tress 121 Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory- John Finnis James C. Doig 123 Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett-ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 11 2011 Parrhesia Number 11 • 2011 • 1-34
    PARRHESIA WWW.PARRHESIAJOURNAL.ORG ISSUE 11 2011 PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 • 2011 • 1-34 THE WORK AND THE IDEA Miguel de Beistegui Editorial Note. The text presented here is the first chapter of an upcoming book by the author. The editorial board would like to thank Professor de Beistegui for allowing us to publish it here; our thanks also go to Robert Sinnerbrink for facilitating its publication. INTRODUCTION This book attempts to show that it is through the recognition of what I call the hypersensible, and the work of metaphor, that art comes into its own, and is able to twist free of metaphysical aesthetics, rooted in the ontology of identity and governed by the laws of imitation. By “hypersensible” I mean a dimension that escapes the classical distinction and the space that stretches between the sensible and the supersensible, matter and form, or the image and the original. In a nutshell, the hypersensible designates the excess of the sensible within the sensible, and the genuine matter of art. As such, it escapes any straightforward materialism, as well as any form of idealism, or spiritualism. It could be characterised as hyletics. For reasons that I will clarify later on, I prefer to refer to it as an aesthetics of metaphor, or a metaphoric. Why metaphor? Simply because, twisting free of its own, deeply entrenched metaphysical interpretation, metaphor can be seen as the image or trope, applicable to art in general, which reveals the excess of the sensible in the sensible, or the way in which any given image is virtually more than it actually is.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conversation with Catherine Malabou
    CATHERINE MALABOU University of Paris X-Nanterre NOËLLE VAHANIAN Lebanon Valley College A CONVERSATION WITH CATHERINE MALABOU he questions of the following interview are aimed at introducing Catherine Malabou’s work and philosophical perspective to an audience who may T have never heard of her, or who knows only that she was a student of Derrida. What I hope that this interview reveals, however, is that Malabou “follows” deconstruction in a timely, and also useful way. For one of the common charges levied against deconstruction, at least by American critics, is that by opening texts to infinite interpretations, deconstruction unfortunately does away with more than the master narratives; it mires political agency in identity politics and offers no way out the socio-historical and political constructs of textuality other than the hope anchored in faith at best, but otherwise simply in the will to believe that the stance of openness to the other will let the other become part of the major discourses without thereby marginalizing or homogenizing them. How does Malabou “follow” deconstruction? Indeed, she does not disavow her affiliation with Derrida; she, too, readily acknowledges that there is nothing outside the text. But, by the same token, she also affirms Hegel’s deep influence on her philosophy. From Hegel, she borrows the central concept of her philosophy, namely, the concept of plasticity; the subject is plastic—not elastic, it never springs back into its original form—it is malleable, but it can explode and create itself anew. In this way, there is nothing outside the text, but the text is no less natural than it is cultural, it is no less biological than it is spiritual (or mental), it is no less material than it is historical.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journal of Feminist Philosophy
    HYPATIA A JOURNAL OF FEMINIST PHILOSOPHY VOLUME 35 NUMBER 4 FALL 2020 Editorial Team (Co-Editors) Editors Emeritae Bonnie Mann, University of Oregon Ann Garry (Co-Editor 2017-2018) Erin McKenna, University of Oregon California State University, Los Angeles Camisha Russel, University of Oregon Serene J. Khader (Co-Editor 2017-2018) Rocio Zambrana, Emory University Brooklyn College and CUNY Graduate Center Hypatia Reviews Online Editors Alison Stone (Co-Editor 2017-2018) Clara Fisher, University College, Dublin Lancaster University Erin McKenna, University of Oregon Sally Scholz (Editor 2013-2017) Villanova University Managing Editors Ann Cudd (Co-Editor 2010-2013) Sarah LaChance Adams, University of North Boston University Florida (Hypatia) Caroline R. Lundquist, University of Oregon Linda Martín Alcoff (Co-Editor 2010-2013) (Hypatia) Hunter College, CUNY Graduate Center Bjørn Kristensen, University of Oregon Alison Wylie (Co-Editor 2008-2013) (Hypatia Reviews Online) University of British Columbia Lori Gruen (Co-Editor 2008-2010) Social Media Editor/ Wesleyan University Managing Editor Assistant Brooke Burns, University of Oregon Hilde Lindemann (Editor 2003-2008) Michigan State University Associate Editors Laurie Shrage (Co-Editor 1998-2003) Maria del Rosario Acosta-López, University of California State Polytechnic University California-Riverside Nancy Tuana (Co-Editor 1998-2003) Saray Ayala-López, California State University- Pennsylvania State University Sacramento Talia Mae Bettcher, University of California- Cheryl Hall (Co-Editor 1995-1998) Los Angeles University of South Florida Ann Cudd, University of Pittsburgh Joanne Waugh (Co-Editor 1995-1998) Vrinda Dalmiya, University of Hawaii-Manoa University of South Florida Verónica Gago, Universidad de Buenos Aires/ Linda López McAlister (Editor 1990-1995, Universidad Nacional de San Martín Co-Editor 1995-1998) Dilek Huseyinzadegan, Emory University University of South Florida Qrescent Mali Mason, Haverford College Krushil Watene, Massey University Margaret A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 2018 ASCP Annual Conference Final Program
    Date: Tuesday 20th Wednesday 21st Thursday 22nd Friday 23rd 2018 Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy Annual Conference: Overview Time Time 8.00am Level 9: 1PSQ Parramatta ASCP Day 1 ASCP Day 2 ASCP Day 3 9.00am Postgrad Seminar Registration Registration Registration 9.00-9.30am Level 9, 1PSQ Parramatta Morning Session 1(A) Morning Session 1(E) Morning Session 1(I) 9.30-11.00am 10.00am 10.00-10.30am Registration/Morning Tea 10.30-12.00pm Applying for ARC grants 11.00am Speakers: Miriam Bankovsky and Joanne Faulkner Break Break Break 11.00-11.30am Chair - Hannah Stark Morning Session 2(B) Morning Session 2(F) Morning Session 2(J) 11.30-1.00pm 12.00pm 12.00-1.00pm Lunch 1.00pm 1.00-2.30pm Publishing as a Postgraduate and Early Career Researcher Lunch Lunch Lunch 1.00-2.30pm Speakers: Sigi Jöttkandt and Timothy Laurie 2.00pm Chair - Anisha Sankar 2.30-3.00pm Afternoon Tea Afternoon Session 1(C) Afternoon Session 1(G) Afternoon Session 1(K) 2.30-4pm 3.00pm 3.00-4.30pm The University as a Site of Struggle and Change Panel discussion organised by Briohny Walker, Jacinta Sassine 4.00pm and Anisha Sankar Break Break Keynote: 4.00-4.30pm Afternoon Session 2(D) Afternoon Session 2(H) James Risser 4.30-6.00pm 5.00pm 5.00-6.30pm Keynote: Chair - Jacinta Sassine. Introduction: Dennis Schmidt Chair - M. Kelly Peg Birmingham - Democracy, Populism, and Superfluity: 6.00pm Lessons from Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism Keynote: Plenary: 6.30-8pm 7.00pm 7.00-9.30pm Opening reception Walter Brogan Genevieve Lloyd Chair - J.
    [Show full text]
  • Confession, Embodiment and Ethics in the Poetry of Antjie Krog and Joan Metelerkamp
    Confession, Embodiment and Ethics in the Poetry of Antjie Krog and Joan Metelerkamp by CHRISTINE LOUISE WEYER Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Meg Samuelson March 2013 Stellenbosch Univeristy http://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis/dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2013 Copyright © 2013 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch Univeristy http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract This thesis examines the work of two contemporary South African poets, Antjie Krog and Joan Metelerkamp. Through an analytical-discursive engagement with their work, it explores the relationship between confession and embodiment, drawing attention to the ethical potential located at the confluence of these theories and modes. The theory informing this thesis is drawn from three broad fields: that of feminism, embodiment studies and ethical philosophy. More specifically, foundational insights will come from the work of Simone de Beauvoir, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Emmanuel Levinas. While much of the theory used originates from Western Europe and North America, this will be mediated by sensitivity towards Krog and Metelerkamp’s South African location, as is fitting for a study focused on embodied confession and the ethical treatment of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Thought and Thinking Being in Hegel's Science of Logic
    BEING THOUGHT AND THINKING BEING IN HEGEL’S SCIENCE OF LOGIC A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Thomas F. Whaling May 2018 Examining Committee Members: Espen Hammer, PhD., Advisory Chair, Philosophy Joseph Margolis, PhD., Philosophy Aryeh Botwinick, PhD., Political Science James Hebbeler, PhD., External Member, St. Joseph’s University © Copyright 2018 By Thomas F. Whaling All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT My aim in this dissertation is to explain Hegel’s motivation for, and the doctrine of, the identity of the identity and difference of thought and being and argue that while thought and being differ, their nature is identical. This identity is used to explain Hegel’s claim that what is real is rational and what is rational is real. The aim of this dissertation is squarely placed within ontology, and my interest is in the structure of being as opposed to metaphysical contents. Within this structure, I argue, Hegel shows us the irrevisable method of that which comes to be and ceases to be. This method (or nature) is a rational process of being itself, which, while its contents are forever changing, they do so from the same invariant identity of thought and being. As a matter of method, there is an increasing difficulty in assessing the merit of Hegel’s account of thought and being – obscuring what merit my interpretation may offer. The difficulty is a growing trend in combining Hegel’s work with specific Kantian ambitions where Hegel is forced into cognitive restrictions he does not have.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to Simon Lumsden on “Second Nature”
    Response to Simon Lumsden on “Second Nature” Andy Blunden This article is a response to Lumsden, S. (2016), Second Nature and Historical Change in Hegel’s Philosophy of History, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol. 24, pp. 74-94. Lumsden’s paper discusses Hegel’s views on historical change with reference to the idea, imputed to Hegel, that a social formation resists change and maintains stasis by the force of habit of its individual citizens. To be authoritative, the norms of the social formation must be embodied, it is said, and ‘embodied’ means embedded in the habits inscribed in the body of each individual person. This claim is utterly implausible as a theory of psychology or social theory and is imputed to Hegel on the basis of taking his use of the terms ‘habit’ and ‘second nature’ in a few places to mean exactly what these terms mean in everyday modern speech. To impute such an implausible theory to Hegel is to discount a great thinker. Lumsden points out that the same German word, Gewohnheit, can be translated as ‘custom’ or ‘habit’, and in ordinary English speech, likewise, ‘habit’ can be used in the sense of ‘the habits of a people’, that is custom, but it is a different concept, and personal habits and social customs have different bases and it is precisely this difference which is at issue here. I shall suggest a more liberal and useful interpretation of what Hegel meant by ‘habit’ and ‘second nature’ which allows a realistic theory of social stability to be imputed to Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit, rather than a quaint and scientifically untenable one.
    [Show full text]