DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday 3 December ASCP 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuesday 3 December ASCP 2013 ASCP 2013 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Day 1: Tuesday 3 December 9.20 - 9.30 Conference opening EA.2.13 (LT02) Professor Peter Hutchings, Dean of the School of Humanities and Communication Arts Dimitris Vardoulakis, Chair of Philosophy@UWS 9.30 - 10.30 Keynote Address EA.2.13 (LT02) James Martel Anarchist all the way down: Walter Benjamin's subversion of authority in text, thought and action Chair: Charles Barbour 10.30 - 10.45 Morning Tea Foyer Area Building EA 10.45 - 12.15 Parallel Session 1 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.36 EA.G.38 Hal Ginges Samuel Cuff Snow John Cleary Toby Juliff Simone Drichel Book Panel: Dalia Nassar, The Romantic Thematic panel: Sartre reconsidered Thematic panel: Spinoza's Authority The Thing-in-itself is not a Thing: Kant, The Promise of Irony: Kierkegaard and “Withered by the identical neutrality of ‘If I contend with thee’: Hopkins and The Disaster of Postcolonial Narcissism Absolute: Being and Knowing in Goethe and the Apprehension of Essences Schiller the gulf” : The concept of the Event in Derrida, in a field in Yorkshire German Romantic Philosophy 1795- Russell Grigg Gregg Lambert the Philosophy of Alain Badiou. Joanne Faulkner 1804 Speaking for myself: Freedom and On Spinoza and “signs” Daniel Wilson Wojciech Kaftanski Maebh Long The Coming Postcolonial Community: Responsibility in Sartre and Freud Reconciling contemporary art with Kant’s Plato's and Kierkegaard's Reading of Chris van Rompaey Absolute Nonabsolute Singularity: Political Ontology of Aboriginal Damion Buterin Dimitris Vardoulakis principles of fine art Imitation Jean-Luc Nancy’s Deconstruction of Derrida and Fragmentation Childhood in Bringing Them Home Paul Redding Talia Morag Inequality as a Critique of Authority Christianity: A Badiouian Critique Simon Lumsden Keeping psychology personal: Sartre, Murray Robertson Jeffrey Hanson Terri Bird Chair: Simone Bignall Bad Faith and the Unconscious Chair: Justin Clemens Can a numinous noumenon exist? He Speaks in Tongues’: Hearing the Truth Alexander Karolis Flesh to frame: reconsidering material Chair: Damian Buterin of Abraham’s Words of Faith Ontological Intersections: Jean-Luc relations through practices of Chair: Jon Roffe Chair: Diego Bubbio Nancy and Martin Heidegger contemporary art Chair: Richard Colledge Chair: Alex Ling Chair: Matheson Russell 12.15 - 13.00 Lunch 13.00 - 14.30 Parallel Session 2 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.36 EA.G.38 Ben Hjorth Valerijs Vinogradovs Alex Ling Jessica Whyte Paul Macovaz Tim Flanagan Thematic panel: Sartre reconsidered Thematic panel: Spinoza and Literature A strange kind of inbetween thing': Lack of Productive Imagination in Sellars' The Categorial Imperative: On Badiou’s Fail again: Fail better? The ‘weak state The Plastic Screen : Cinema's corporeo- Deleuze and Disquiet Translating Hegel with Anne Carson Appropriation of Kantian Imagination Mathematics of the Transcendental crisis’ and the language of failure. cognitive foil Robert Sinnerbrink Moira Gatens Hannah Stark A Dangerous Mind: Sartre, Huston and Deliberative Fictions: Spinoza and the James Muldoon Gene Flenady Justin Clemens Timothy O'Leary Cameron Ironside Corn Man Walking: Deleuze and Plants the Freud Screenplay concept of an ars Would Hegel be a Foucaultian Today? Making Sense in/of Discourse, Figure: Polemic as logic in the work of Alain Get Over Yourself! Foucault’s Critique of Film and the Metaphysics of Possible Lyotard's Reading of Hegel and our Badiou Ethical Experience Worlds Emma Shea Davies David MacArthur Anthony Uhlmann Michael Leininger-Ogawa Reading of Lyotard Who cries when a rock dies? The Sartre, Wittgenstein and the Logical Spinoza and Understanding and Paul Veyne's Foucault Chair: Alex Ling Chair: Miguel Vatter Conall Cash connection between grief and ethics in Form of Language Meaning in Nature and in Art Lucian Green Immediacy and Representation in the the human-nonhuman relationship Chair: Paul Alberts Overturning Hegel’s experience of Cinema of Lee Chang-dong Chair: Eleanor Kaufman Chair: Dimitris Vardoulakis alienation through five-fold humanities Chair: Craig Lundy lenses Chair: Greg Flaxman Chair: Peter Banki 14.30 - 14.45 Break 14.45 - 16.15 Parallel Session 3 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.36 EA.G.38 Tiffany Plotzza Louise Richardson-Self Demanding Tessa Clews Fiona Jenkins Mathew Abbott Craig Lundy Book panel: Genevieve Lloyd, Thematic panel: Animal Voices Subjectivity and the Other: The founding Respect: Rainer Forst’s Reflections on The Emasculating Angel: An Anti-Oedipal Law's Deformability and the Politics of Cinematic Scepticism: Abbas Bergson, History and Ontology Enlightenment Shadows role of the Other in the formation of the Tolerance and Luce Irigaray’s Philosophy Reading of Castrations in Film Address Kiarostami and Film-Philosophy Christopher Peterson subject in the ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. of Sexuate Difference Sean Bowden Anik Waldow The Monolingualism of the Human Thierry Jutel Marcelo Svirsky Laurence Simmons Ontological Relativity and Indirect Dalia Nassar Lisa Slater Jeff Stewart Location, locality and place: Pacific Rim, Subjectivity and Profanation The Unfilmable Discourse: A Potted History with a Max Deutscher Chris Danta Waiting at the border: impossibility, Franz Rosenzweig, Martin Heidegger, Luce The Hobbit and Global Hollywood Deleuzian Coda "Might sovereignty be devouring?" generosity and settler Australian amnesia Irigaray, and the no-longer-book Chair: Sarah Sorial Chair: Robert Sinnerbrink Chair: Paul Patton Derrida and the Fable Aleksandr Andreas Wansbrough Chair: Jon Roffe Liz Dean Rebecca Hill The Banality and Transcendence of Evil: Chair: Dinesh Wadiwel The Ethics of an Encounter; habits and Fold: on the Implication of Ideas and the Tragic Hero as a grovelling Nazi in change Becoming Lars von Trier’s Images of a Relief Chair: Lubica Ucník Chair: Elizabeth Stephens Chair: Saige Walton 16.15 - 16.30 Afternoon Tea Foyer Area Building EA 16.30 - 17.30 Keynote Address EA.2.13 (LT02) Elizabeth Rottenberg Jacques Derrida and the "Question" of the Death Penalty Chair: Dimitris Vardoulakis Day 2: Wednesday 4 December 09.00 - 10.30 Parallel Session 4 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.34 EA.G.36 Emma Wilson Astrid Lorange Amy Stefanovic Thomas Ryan Onni Hirvonen Knox Peden Goetz Richter Thematic panel: Deleuze’s Dramatic The Psyche of the Spectacle: An aesthetic account of new Democracy is Common Knowledge Nietzsche's cure from the metaphysical The possibilities of Hegelian group The Irony of Equality: Rancière and Heidegger's Music Concepts: The Dark Precursor and Kristeva's Theory of Revolt in a Post- materialisms and dissonant need recognition History the Spiritual Automaton Revolutionary Age feminisms Janice Richardson Sally Macarthur Spinoza, Information and Privacy Paul Alberts Mirjam van der Heide Matheson Russell Deleuzianising the Composer Identity Simone Bignall Emma McNicol Martyn Lloyd Nietzsche: Relationality and the Struggles for dignity Kojève's Phenomenology of Right The Obscure Drama of the Political Insights gained from Simone de Re-Reading Wahl: Le Malheur de la Ozgur Yalcin Conditions for Naturalism Chair: Greg Hainge Idea Beauvoir's (recently published) conscience dans la philosophie de The constitution of democratic Andrea Mattia Marcelli Chair: Dimitris Vardoulakis diaries Hegel and French Hegelianism’s society: Rawls or Habermas? David Rowe Hermeneutics as epistemic ground: Gregory Flaxman ‘First Wave’ Nietzsche's Negative View of Freedom A Foucauldian trail Thinking/Cinema Daniel Mafe Chair: Daniel McLoughlin A notional ekphrasis: describing the Amanda Third Chair: Joanne Faulkner Chair: Heikki Ikäheimo Eleanor Kaufman unimaginable, Pontormo and Contracting Pleasures: Sex, The Dark Precursor and What Lyotard’s affect phrase Infidelity and Gender in Erotic Follows Fiction Chair: Marguerite La Caze Chair: Gregg Lambert Chair: Fiona Jenkins 10.30 - 10.45 Morning Tea Foyer Area Building EA 10.45 - 11.45 Parallel Session 5 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.34 Book panel: Charles Barbour, The Book Panel: Max Deutscher, In Response panel: William Franke Book panel: Jeff Malpas, ‘We Response panel: Robyn Ferrell Free ASCP Postgraduate Professional Marx-Machine: Politics, Polemics, Sensible Judgement The New Apophatic Universalism: Hyperboreans’: Towards a Stuff: Development Session Ideology Deconstruction, Negative Theology, and Nietzschean Topography The Cost of Culture Michael Carey Open Togetherness in the European James Martel Michelle Boulous Walker Tradition Respondent: Paul Alberts Respondent: Jess Whyte Anna Yeatman Chair: Paul Crittenden Respondent: Chris Hackett Chair: Peg Birmingham Chair: Allison Weir Chair: Dimitris Vardoulakis Chair: Diego Bubbio 11.45 - 12.00 Break 12.00 - 13.00 ASCP Annual General Meeting EA.2.13 (LT02) 13.00 - 13.30 Lunch 13.30 - 15.00 Parallel Session 6 EA.G.10 EA.G.15 EA.G.26 EA.G.27 EA.G.32 EA.G.33 EA.G.34 EA.G.36 Damion Buterin Dimitri Vouros Mike Grimshaw Pat McConville Valeria Pashkova Severin Staalesen Book panel: Justin Clemens, Thematic panel: Animal Studies Hegel's Rejoinder to Nominalism Reinterpreting Hegelian Totality Hermeneutic capitalism? A Truths The Hand Can Touch: Towards A Hannah Arendt and the tradition of Something's got to give: Psychoanalysis is an Antiphilosophy and Abstract Universality in precursor to Vattimo & Zabala Bioconservative Existentialism Western thought phenomenology, cognitive science, Derrida's animals Emily Finlay Adorno's Philosophy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WSRC3290 ASCP 2018 Conference Program FA.Indd
    AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 AUSTRALASIAN SOCIETY FOR CONTINENTAL PHILOSOPHY ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COUNTRY THANKS TO Western Sydney University would like to acknowledge the ≥ Professor Peter Hutchings, Dean of the School of Humanities Burramattagal people of the Darug tribe, who are the traditional and Communication Arts custodians of the land on which Western Sydney University at Jacinta Sassine and the student volunteers Parramatta stands. We respectfully acknowledge the Burramattagal ≥ people’s Ancestors and Elders, past and present and acknowledge ≥ Hannah Stark, Timothy Laurie and student volunteers their 60,000 year unceded occupation of these lands. who organized the PG event ≥ Panel organisers: Dr Suzi Adams and Dr Jeremy Smith; Professor WELCOME Thomas M. Besch; Professor Francesco Borghesi; Dr Sean Bowden; Associate Professor Diego Bubbio; Dr Millicent Churcher; Dr Richard The Conference Organising Committee for 2018 extends a warm Colledge; Dr Ingo Farin; Associate Professor Chris Fleming; Dr John welcome to all our international and Australian participants, and all Hadley; Professor Vanessa Lemm; Professor Li Zhi; Associate Professor others associated with the conference. The ASCP conference is this year hosted by Western Sydney University, at our new Parramatta David Macarthur; Associate Professor Sally Macarthur; Dr Jennifer City campus. The event has been planned and developed across Mensch; Professor Nick Mansfield; Dr Talia Morag; Associate Professor this year by members of the Philosophy Research Initiative. Eric S. Nelson; Professor Ping He; Dr Rebecca Hill; Associate Professor Janice Richardson and Dr Jon Rubin; Dr Marilyn Stendera; Dr Omid Tofighian; Professor Miguel Vatter and Dr Nicholas Heron; Dr Allison CONFERENCE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Weir; Dr Magdalena Zolkos.
    [Show full text]
  • In Mimetic Theory
    Doubles, Narcissists, Victims, and Philosophers: Truth and “After Truth” in Mimetic Theory Scott Cowdell Many factors contribute to today’s “after truth” situation. Regarding Brexit, for instance, when populist nationalistic myth trumped entrenched economic rationalism, one commentator points to non-serious Tory media tarts like Boris Johnson overshadowing more serious policy contributors from the political left.1 And, from this side of the ditch, Kurt Anderson addresses a cultural history of programmatic American self-delusion in his bestseller Fantasyland.2 He points to America’s early-modern origins in dreams of non- existent Eldorado and projects of religious extremism, to its subsequent tastes for hucksterism and fundamentalism, to its widespread preference for the pleasure principle over the reality principle and, notably, to the key contribution of today’s culturally relativistic left-wing intellectuals whom he considers to be “useful idiots”. All this adds up to what Anderson calls America’s “fantasy industrial complex”. And, wherever you look, social media is supplanting traditional curated media, privatizing the commons and edging out the truth. It creates disconnected echo chambers of invincible ignorance rather than the global unity that Mark Zuckerberg used to say he believed in. The English political theologian Adrian Pabst describes the ideal politician in this brave new world as ideas-free, preferring targeted messaging based on computer algorithms over debate.3 Part of the problem is surely just how human beings are. The Nobel Prize-winning Israeli experimental psychologist, Daniel Kahneman, has shown that many real-life decisions are approached non-rationally. We are prone to biases and unreliable heuristics, we resist thinking carefully and taking stock, and we are not good natural statisticians when assessing financial risks.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNY PRESS Fall 2017
    SUNY PRESS fall 2017 353 Broadway, State University Plaza Albany, NY 12246-0001 Visit SUNY Press catalogs on phone: 1-866-430-7869/518-944-2800 fax: 518-320-1592 www.sunypress.edu contents EXCELSIOR EDITIONS 1–12 Warehouse & Order Fulfillment African Studies 45 Ordering Address African American Studies 44–45 SUNY Press Archaeology (new in paper) 41 PO Box 960 Herndon, VA 20172-0960 Asian Studies 14–19 Buddhist Studies (new in paper) 24 Phone & Fax Numbers Toll-free Customer Service: Chinese Studies (new in paper) 19 877-204-6073 Codhill Press 55–56 Toll Customer Service: Cultural Studies 50–51 703-661-1575 Education 57–59 Toll-free Fax: Environmental Studies 42 877-204-6074 Film Studies 52–53 Toll Fax: 703-996-1010 Gender Studies 50 Hispanic Studies 43–44 Ordering E-mail [email protected] History (new in paper) 41 Indigenous Studies 51–52 Returns Address Jewish Studies 46–47 SUNY Press Returns Dept. Journals 60 22883 Quicksilver Dr. Latin American Studies 42–43 Dulles, VA 20166 Literature (new in paper) 54 Standard Address Number (SAN) Middle Eastern Studies 48 760-7261 Muswell Hill Press 54–55 New York 13 Philosophy 25–33 Political Science 34–40 Psychoanalysis 34 Religious Studies 20–24 Sociology 41 Women’s Studies 48–49 A proud member of the Association of American University Presses Order Form 60 Sales Representation 62–63 Cover: Evans et al./Black Women’s Mental Health, p. 44, cover art by Tariq Mix. Author Index 64 The Semitica fonts used to create this work are © 1986–2003 Payne Loving Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists By
    Review Reviewed Work(s): Self-consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists by Simon LUMSDEN Review by: Michael Baur Source: The Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 69, No. 2 (DECEMBER 2015), pp. 395-397 Published by: Philosophy Education Society Inc. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24636496 Accessed: 21-10-2019 12:56 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Philosophy Education Society Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Review of Metaphysics This content downloaded from 150.108.161.119 on Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:56:09 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms SUMMARIES AND COMMENTS 395 these other philosophers more clearly than they did themselves. What is more, he also develops those ideas further than anyone else I can think of, adding his own insights as he goes along. The result is a coherent and compelling defense of second-orderism. I would certainly recommend this book to any philosopher interested in ontological commitment or second-order logic, and given its clarity, I would recommend Part II to students as well. —Robert Trueman, Robinson College, Cambridge LUMSDEN, Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Colledge Between Ultra-Essentialism and Post
    Between Ultra-Essentialism and Post-Essentialism: Kierkegaard as Transitional and Contemporary Richard Colledge Søren Kierkegaard is an extraordinary figure in the history of philosophy. If one is prepared to use the broadest of brushstrokes, there is much to be said for seeing him as standing on the threshold of, and crucially contributing to, the transition between modern and contemporary European philosophy. In this contributory role of mediating between epochs of thought, it is fitting that he shares much in common with his predecessor and fellow herald of the transcendent God of Christianity—Augustine—in the latter’s standing astride the ancient and the medieval, and in likewise providing key elements for a momentous shift in the dominant philo-theological framework. Yet Kierkegaard is also something of an enigma; he is much too multi-dimensional in his concerns and subtle in his distinctions to be easily summed up in catch-phrases such as “the father of existentialism,” as justified as such ascriptions may be. Like Augustine, Kierkegaard’s influence in a range of purportedly distinct ‘disciplines’ is extensive, for like the former, he saw no difficulties in—indeed he saw an imperative for —addressing philosophy, theology and psychology together.1 In this way, Kierkegaard’s influence on twentieth century thought has been immense, from his impact on Jaspers, the early Heidegger, Sartre and the ‘existentialist’ movement generally; to his inspiration of Barth and Tillich and other seminal thinkers in Protestant theology; to his (largely indirect) influence on psychodynamic theory and practice developed by theorists such as May, Fromm and Becker; to the continuing influence of his work on contemporary post-secular and quasi-religious deconstructionist thought.
    [Show full text]
  • ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December
    ASCP 2019 Program – Tuesday 3 December Postgraduate/Early Career Researcher Day: 356 North Wing, Arts West 12.30-1.00 Registration 1.00-2.00 Grant adventures: The ups and downs of the grant process Knox Peden Christopher Mayes Louise Richardson-Self 2.00-3.00 Afternoon Tea 3.00-4.00 Philosophy pathways: What you can do and how you can get there Jack Reynolds Ross Barham Rachel Joy 4.00-4.30 Break 4.30-5.30 Publishing without perishing: Publication tips Marguerite La Caze Andrew Inkpin Daniel Lopez Public Lecture B117 Glyn Davies Building/Melbourne School of Design (free, no registrations required) 7.30-8.30 Martin Hägglund This Life: Why Mortality Makes Us Free ASCP 2019 Program – Wednesday 4 December 8.15-8.45 Registration 8.45-10.30 Welcome to Country: Aunty Di. Conference Opening: Prof. Margaret Cameron (Head of School, SHAPS, University of Melbourne) Keynote ‐ Rebecca Comay, ‘Deadlines (literally)’ 10.30-11.00 Morning Tea Room 1 Room 2 Room 3 Room 4 Room 5 Room 6 Room 7 Room 8 Room 9 Room 10 11.00-12.30 Thematic Panel: Thematic Panel: Janice Richardson Anya Daly John Cleary What Joeri Mol Leonard D’Cruz Steven Churchill “It is George Duke Book Panel: Jon Religion and the Hegel and French Spinoza, Locke, and The Declaration of is an Idea? Plato's Organizing Space: The Methodological stupid to confuse the Political Romanticism Roffe, ed., The Limits of Reason in Philosophy the Influence Industry Interdependence!: theory of Subjectivity and the Significance of moral and the Works of Gilles the Early and Late Feminism, grounding participation
    [Show full text]
  • International Philosophical Quarterly
    International Philosophical Quarterly VOL. XL, No. 1 Issue No. 157 March 2000 ARTICLES Presenting Our Authors 3 Demons, Psychopaths, and the Formation of Consciences Hayden Ramsay 5 Anne Conway's Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes Jennifer McRobert 21 Neither Deconstruction nor Reconstruction: Metaphysics and the Intimate Strangeness of Being William Desmond 37 Dasein Comes after the Episternic Subject, But Who Is Dasein? Mariana Ortega 51 Reading, Imagination, and Interpretation: A Ricoeurian Response Mark S. Muldoon 69 A Subject for Hegel's Logic Simon Lumsden 85 BOOK REVIEWS AND NOTICES Galen, On Antecedent Causes-ed. and trans. R. J. Hankinson Robert J Penella 101 What We Owe to Each Other-T. M. Scanlon Peter Vallentyne 102 Puzzles for the Will: Fatalism, Newcomb and Samarra, Determinism and Omniscience-Jordan Howard Sobel Bruce A. Aune 103 The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson- ed. Lewis Edwin Hahn Dorothy Grover 105 Plato's Sophist-Martin Heidegger Daniel R. Ahem 107 Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves-Rae Langton David Carr 109 Dispositions-Stephen Mumford Rom Harre 110 (cont' d.) Language and Solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg Dilemma-Ernest Gellner H. 0. Mounce 112 Mind in Action-Bede Rundle David R. Cerbone 114 Providence and the Problem of Evil­ Richard Swinburne W. Matthews Grant 115 An Introduction to African Philosophy- Samuel Oluoch Imbo F. Ochieng-Odhiambo 117 Plato's Dream of Sophistry-Richard Marback Giles Hibbert, O. P. 120 Method in Ancient Philosophy-ed. Jyl Gentzler Daryl M. Tress 121 Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory- John Finnis James C. Doig 123 Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honour of Michael Dummett-ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 11 2011 Parrhesia Number 11 • 2011 • 1-34
    PARRHESIA WWW.PARRHESIAJOURNAL.ORG ISSUE 11 2011 PARRHESIA NUMBER 11 • 2011 • 1-34 THE WORK AND THE IDEA Miguel de Beistegui Editorial Note. The text presented here is the first chapter of an upcoming book by the author. The editorial board would like to thank Professor de Beistegui for allowing us to publish it here; our thanks also go to Robert Sinnerbrink for facilitating its publication. INTRODUCTION This book attempts to show that it is through the recognition of what I call the hypersensible, and the work of metaphor, that art comes into its own, and is able to twist free of metaphysical aesthetics, rooted in the ontology of identity and governed by the laws of imitation. By “hypersensible” I mean a dimension that escapes the classical distinction and the space that stretches between the sensible and the supersensible, matter and form, or the image and the original. In a nutshell, the hypersensible designates the excess of the sensible within the sensible, and the genuine matter of art. As such, it escapes any straightforward materialism, as well as any form of idealism, or spiritualism. It could be characterised as hyletics. For reasons that I will clarify later on, I prefer to refer to it as an aesthetics of metaphor, or a metaphoric. Why metaphor? Simply because, twisting free of its own, deeply entrenched metaphysical interpretation, metaphor can be seen as the image or trope, applicable to art in general, which reveals the excess of the sensible in the sensible, or the way in which any given image is virtually more than it actually is.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedura Di Valutazione Comparativa Per La Stipula Di N
    PROCEDURA DI VALUTAZIONE COMPARATIVA PER LA STIPULA DI N. 1 CONTRATTO DI DIRITTO PRIVATO PER RICERCATORE A TEMPO DETERMINATO, AI SENSI DELL’ART. 24, COMMA 3, LETT. B) DELLA LEGGE 30 DICEMBRE 2010, N. 240, PER IL S.C. 11/C1 - FILOSOFIA TEORETICA PROFILO RICHIESTO S.S.D. M-FIL/01 - FILOSOFIA TEORETICA DIPARTIMENTO DI CIVILTÀ ANTICHE E MODERNE PRESSO L’UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MESSINA VERBALE 2 (Valutazione preliminare dei candidati e ammissione alla discussione pubblica) L’anno 2020 il giorno 11 del mese di novembre alle ore 17:00 si riunisce al completo, per via telematica, la Commissione giudicatrice, nominata con D.R. prot. n. 0094164 del 8/10/2020, pubblicato sul sito internet dell’Università di Messina, della valutazione comparativa in epigrafe, per procedere alla valutazione comparativa dei titoli, dei curricula e della produzione scientifica dei candidati, ivi compresa la tesi di dottorato. Sono presenti i sotto elencati commissari: Prof. Gianluca Cuozzo (Università degli studi di Torino) Prof. Donatella Di Cesare (Università Sapienza di Roma) Prof. Caterina Resta (Università degli studi di Messina) Il Presidente della Commissione comunica che sono trascorsi almeno 7 giorni dalla pubblicizzazione dei criteri e che la Commissione può legittimamente proseguire i lavori. I componenti accedono, tramite le proprie credenziali, alla piattaforma informatica https://istanze.unime.it/ e prendono visione dell’elenco dei candidati che risultano essere (in ordine alfabetico): 1. Angeloni Roberto 2. Bazzoni Bueno André 3. Bubbio Paolo Diego 4. Caffo Leonardo 5. Cerasi Enrico 6. Croci Federico 7. Forlè Francesca 8. Fulco Rita 9. Marafioti Rosa Maria 10. Pace Giannotta Andrea Sebastiano 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media and the Existential Task of Existence
    SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE EXISTENTIAL TASK OF EXISTENCE A Report of a Senior Study By Branden Hunt Philosophy Maryville College Fall, 2013 Date Approved _______________, by ______________________________ Faculty Supervisor Date Approved _______________, by ______________________________ Division Chair ABSTRACT Modern technology continues to barrel ahead at breakneck speeds engulfing our lives in ever greater degrees. It is little wonder that the question of what technology holds in store for us is increasing in its significance. Focusing on one particular dimension of technology that has proved especially volatile and ubiquitous this thesis endeavors to ask what is going on at the meeting of social media and humanity. In an effort to ascertain a more critical ground from which to ask such a question, this project begins with a survey of two thinkers who devoted much due attention to the matter of human being: Soren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger. Both carved great and diverse inroads into the strangely proximal yet so often unasked question: what is it to be human? By drawing on and synthesizing significant aspects of their expositions, necessary pre-questions are asked to prepare the lingering question: what is going on with human being in a socially mediated world? The relatively brief conclusions given in response are an exercise in answering that question, revealing a fundamental altercation brought about in the mediation of human being through social media. That transformation is found to take place in technological enframent of human communication. iii Table of Contents Chapter I The Task of Existence 4 Chapter II On Being and Human Being 25 Chapter III Social Media and the Task of Human Being 81 Bibliography 123 iv AN INTRODUCTION It is difficult to decide where to begin this introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • JOSEPH DE MAISTRE and ITALY Marco Ravera It Is Very Likely That Joseph De Maistre Would Not Have Been Very Much Interested in Th
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin JOSEPH DE MAISTRE AND ITALY Marco Ravera It is very likely that Joseph de Maistre would not have been very much interested in the subject of the reception of his own thought in Italy.1 He did not consider himself Italian—and, in spite of his being Francophone, he did not consider himself French either—but only and exclusively Savoyard (or rather, in the last phase of his life, Savoyard and European at the same time, but certainly not Italian). His eyes and his attention were always drawn to France; and the early impulses for the national unity of Italy that happened a few years aft er the Restoration—a legacy of that Napoleonic epos which he abhorred so much—left him perplexed and astonished, rather than disturbed and troubled. It is true that, given that he died at the end of February 1821, he could not witness (or, we might say, he was spared the sight of) the early risings for unity. However, his opinion in this respect is con- densed, through refl ections enriched by that sarcastic irony which dis- tinguishes several of his writings, in some famous claims included in the letter to the marquis d’Azeglio2 of 21 February 1821—that is, three days before his death—where, with ill-concealed scepticism, he won- ders whether and to what extent one can call himself ‘Italian’. Aft er hav- ing thanked his correspondent for having sent to him a basketful of fruit, the nearly expiring lion still shows his claws and, taking his cue from some considerations on Piedmont and Italy made by d’Azeglio in the letter that accompanied the gift , added long refl ections on this sub- ject.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacrifice, Self-Formation and Self-Overcoming in Nietzsche Venessa Ercole
    parrhesia 28 · 2017 · 156-175 sacrifice, self-formation and self-overcoming in nietzsche venessa ercole Nietzsche’s emphasis on self-overcoming and self-mastery in the higher type and the figure of the overman are usually associated with aristocracy, rank and the sacrifice of others in the pursuit of personal excellence. Indeed, Nietzsche’s dis- cussion of the “lower types,” “slave morality” and “master morality” lends itself to an elitist misreading. However, Nietzsche’s opposition to democracy and equality stems from his endorsement of differentiation and particularly his concern with life-affirmation and life-denial. That is to say, Nietzsche’s seeming regard for the “higher type” comes from its status, for Nietzsche, as more life-affirming than the herd. However, contrary to popular readings, Nietzsche’s aim is not for a world of noble masters who obtain their rank at the expense of the lower types. Ulti- mately, as a close reading of Thus Spoke Zarathustra reveals, even the higher type must be sacrificed in pursuit of Nietzsche’s ultimate goal, of saying yes to life. The question which then arises is this: what role does self-sacrifice play in Nietzsche’s thoughts on the self in formation—in becoming what one is? Sacrifice has not yet been satisfactorily discussed in the expansive commentary on Nietzsche’s philosophy. The majority of what has been said on Nietzsche’s views of sacrifice paint Nietzsche in an elitist light. It is no wonder, given Ni- etzsche’s aphoristic style, that he has been interpreted in such a way. However, these readings fail to see how Nietzsche’s views of sacrifice are intrinsically tied to his notion of self-overcoming, forming an important component of his vision of the Dionysian man.
    [Show full text]