GAMINI DISSANAYAKE (PETITIONER in SC 4/91) V. MCM KALEEL and OTHERS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GAMINI DISSANAYAKE (PETITIONER in SC 4/91) V. MCM KALEEL and OTHERS sc Gamini Dissanayake v. M. C. M. Kaleel and Others 135 GAMINI DISSANAYAKE (PETITIONER IN SC 4/91) v. M. C. M. KALEEL AND OTHERS (Note : Similar applications in Cases Bearing No. 5/91, No. 6/91, No. 7/91, No. 8/91 and 9/91, No. 10/91, No. 11/91 were heard together and disposed of in one judgment). SUPREME COURT. FERNANDO, J. KULATUNGA, J. AND WADUGODAPITIYA, J. S.C. (Special). No. 4 - 11/91. OCTOBER 31 AND NOVEMBER 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 AND 13, 1991. Article 99 (13) (a) of the Constitution - Notice of resolution to impeach the President - Speaker's notification to President of entertaining resolution [Article 38 (2) (a) and (b)] - Vote of confidence in President by Cabinet Members - Inconsistency of expulsion with the provisions of the Constitution and Statute Law - Jurisdiction of Working Committee of U.N.P. - Position of an MP vis-a-vis his Party - Signing notice of resolution to remove the President and agitation for constitutional changes - Failure to initiate prior internal discussion - Causing insult and injury to the President - Deceiving the Cabinet - Breach of rules of natural justice - Audi alteram partem - Bias - Mala tides. Eight Members of the United National Party who were also members of Parliament singly filed eight petitions bearing numbers SC 4 - 11/91 challenging their expulsion from the Party. The respective petitioners in applications No. SC 5/91 and No. SC 8/91 were Ministers of Cabinet rank in the UNP government shortly before their expulsion. The petitioner in application No. SC 9/91 and the petitioner in application No. SC 10/91 were a State Minister and Project Minister respectively in ttie UNP government shortly before their expulsion. The petitioners have filed their respective applications under and in terms of Article 99 (13) (a) of the Constitution. The expulsion of these eight members of the United National Party if held to be valid will result in their being deprived of their seats in Parliament The eight applications were heard together. The eight petitioners were alleged to have participated in steps being taken in late August 1991 under Article 38 (1) (e) read with Article 38 (2) for the removal of the President who was also the leader of the United National Party. Notice of a resolution in terms of Article 38 (2) (a) signed by more than the half the whole number of members of Parliament was stated to have been handed in to the Speaker who on 28 136 S ri Lanka Law Reports [1993/ 2 S ri L.R. August 1991 informed the President in writing declaring that he had entertained the said resolution in terms of Article 38 (2) (b) and drawing attention to proviso (c) to Article 70 (1). On 08 October 1991 however the Speaker announced in Parliament that having inquired into the matter he was of the view that the notice of resolution did not have the required number of valid signatures and accordingly could not be proceeded with. The Speaker's letter of 28 August 1991 was received by the President when a Cabinet Meeting at which the petitioners in SC 5/91 and SC 8/91 were present, was in progress. A vote of confidence in the President was called for and those present including the petitioners in SC 5/91 and SC 8/91 unanimously expressed their support for the President by a show of hands. However, it later became known that they supported the notice and they resigned from the Cabinet on 30 August 1991. On 30 August 1991 the President prorogued Parliament until 24 September 1991. The resolution in question alleged that the President was guilty of intentional violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, misconduct or corruption including the abuse of the powers of his office, offences involving moral turpitude, permanent incapacity to discharge the functions of his office by reason of mental or physicial infirmity, undermining the powers of Parliament and of Cabinet Ministers, giving direct orders to Secretaries by-passing their Ministers, engaging Secretaries to obtain confidential reports on their Ministers, endangering the security of the State by arming the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), sending off the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) without considering military aspects, resorting to unlawful telephone tapping (including telephones of Ministers), engaging in wasteful expenditure, including Gam Udawa Celebrations and establishing a one man dictatorship. Between 30 August 1991 and 08 September 1991 the petitioners launched a public campaign reiterating the principal allegations contained in the notice of resolution as well as other criticisms of the President and appealing for the abolition of the Executive Presidential system and the restoration of Parliamentary Democracy making the Executive directly responsible to Parliament. This campaign also revealed that opposition members had been associated with the petitioner in regard to the notice of resolution and that the petitioners desired the widest possible publicity for their views, it was claimed that 47 members of the UNP had signed the notice of resolution. On 03 September 1991, 116 members of the Government Parliamentary Group presented to the Speaker a writing dated 30 August 1991 stating that they do not support the resolution and those of them who had signed it were withdrawing their signatures and consent and they claimed that they had signed through mistake or because of misrepresentation. sc Gamini Dissanayake v. M. C. M. Kaleel and Others 137 On 05 September 1991 the petitioners anticipating disciplinary action by the Party for expulsion instituted actions in the District Court of Colombo for declarations and injunctions against steps being taken for their expulsion. On 06 September 1991 they were refused relief. Before they could go to the Court of appeal, the Disciplinary Committee of the Party met the same evening and recommended expulsion. A meeting of the working Committee followed immediately thereafter, and a resolution for the expulsion of all eight petitioners was passed. On 07 September 1991 the 2500 strong National Executive Committee (NEC) unanimously endorsed that decision. By letters dated 09 September 1991 the petitioners were informed that they were expelled from the party with effect from 06 September 1991 by a decision of the Working Committee. No reference was made to NEC's endorsement. The petitioners continued their public campaign through meetings and rallies countrywide, press conferences and publicity in the media. The petitioners filed the present applications and their principal challenge was on the following grounds : (a) Absence of jurisdiction in the Working Committee. (b) Inconsistency with the provisions of the Constitution and Statute Law. (c) Breach of the rules of natural justice particularly the audi alteram partem rule. (d) Bias and mala fides. Held : The resolution of the NEC (passed on 19 April 1991) by using the phrase " full powers to carry out the responsibilities and functions of the National Executive Council " manifests an intention to delegate all powers, duties and functions including the responsibility and the function in relation to disciplinary matters. The Party Constitution does not treat the Working Committee as a subordinate body to be entrusted only with routine matters of daily administration. Rule 8 (3) (m) of the U.N.P. Constitution expressly empowered the National Executive Committee (NEC) to vest all or any of its powers and duties whether expressly enumerated or not on the Working Committee. The delegation in question does not purport to be permanent or irrevocable, and thus there is no denudation of its powers by the Executive Committee. Its size the difficulty of having frequent meetings, and the complexity of the decision - making process in a large body are matters which the Executive Committee could legitimately have taken into account in delegating its powers to a smaller Working Committee selected from among its own members. The Executive Committee was authorised to and did validly vest in or delegate to the Working Committee its disciplinary powers under Rule 8 (3) (m). The Working Committee had jurisdiction to take disciplinary action against the petitioners. 138 Sri Lanka Law Reports [1993] 2 S ri LR . Our Constitution confers primacy to the political party as against the individual M.P. The party carries the mandate of the electors and in turn gives a mandate to the M.P. The exercise of the rights of the petitioners qua MP's is subordinate to the requirements of party discipline and their freedom to agitate matters in public is constrained by reason of their obligations to the party which they have freely undertaken to honour. Issues in regard to leadership and the system of government are matters of prime importance to the party and dissenting views should have been the subject of internal discussion before being ventilated outside party circles. The internal discussion procedure was mandatory even if the internal decision might not be binding. A member is not reduced to the position of a mere cog in the party machine. Some of his constitutional functions are essentially discretionary and quasi - judicial, some even judicial. Thus article 4 (c) enables Parliament to exercise the judicial power of the people in regard to parliamentary privilege. Any member of Parliament was entitled to sign the notice of resolution in the exercise of his independent judgment and discretion. Signing a notice intended to be presented, and in fact presented to Parliament in respect of a matter within its province is a proceeding in Parliament. Freedom of speech (and thought, conscience and expression) clearly embraces the people's right to know, the wide dissemination of information and opinions, the public discussion of all matters of public concern and criticism, however strongly worded, and even if foolish and without moderation, of public measures and government action, all this, of course, by peaceful means and without incitement to violence.
Recommended publications
  • An Examination of Regional Views on South Asian Co-Operation with Special Reference to Development and Security Perspectives in India and Shri Lanka
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Northi Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS of PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No
    RESULTS OF PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 1 Colombo North V.A. Sugathadasa Elephant 20,930 97 44,511 Harris Wickremetunge Chair 13,783 W.I.A. Corsby Fernando Ship 164 A.S. Jayamaha Cockerel 97 2 Colombo Central R. Premadasa Elephant 69,310 5,491 240,597 99,265 Falil Caffoor Chair 63,624 Pieter Keuneman Star 58,557 M. Haleem Ishak Hand 41,716 C. Durairajah Umbrella 783 M. Haroun Careem Bell 413 Poopathy Saravanamuttu Ship 396 Panangadan Raman Krishnan Pair of Scales 307 3 Borella Kusala Abhayawardana (Mrs.) Key 16,421 50 32,810 42,849 M.H. Mohamed Elephant 15,829 M.A. Mansoor Pair of Scales 510 4 Colombo South J.R. Jayawardena Elephant 57,609 1,134 97,928 66,136 Bernard Soysa Key 36,783 Ratnasabapathy Wijaya Indra Eye 1,166 Ariyadasa Peiris Bell 561 A.S. Jayamaha Cockerel 241 Mudalige Justin Perera Flower 165 Joseph Beling Chair 164 Yathiendradasa Manampery Pair of Scales 105 5 Wattala A.D.J.L. Leo Hand 21,856 106 41,629 48,875 D. Shelton Jayasinghe Elephant 19,667 6 Negombo Denzil Fernando Elephant 20,457 132 36,509 44,284 Justin Fernando Hand 15,920 RESULTS OF PARLIAMENTARY GENERAL ELECTION - May 27, 1970 No of No of Total No. of Votes No of No. and Name of Electoral District Name of the Elected Candidate Symbol allotted Votes Votes Polled including Registered Polled rejected rejected Electors 7 Katana K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Volume 2
    Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Edited by Asanga Welikala Volume 2 18 Failure of Quasi-Gaullist Presidentialism in Sri Lanka Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Choices Sri Lanka’s Constitution combines a presidential system selectively borrowed from the Gaullist Constitution of France with a system of proportional representation in Parliament. The scheme of proportional representation replaced the ‘first past the post’ elections of the independence constitution and of the first republican constitution of 1972. It is strongly favoured by minority parties and several minor parties that owe their very existence to proportional representation. The elective executive presidency, at least initially, enjoyed substantial minority support as the president is directly elected by a national electorate, making it hard for a candidate to win without minority support. (Sri Lanka’s ethnic minorities constitute about 25 per cent of the population.) However, there is a growing national consensus that the quasi-Gaullist experiment has failed. All major political parties have called for its replacement while in opposition although in government, they are invariably seduced to silence by the fruits of office. Assuming that there is political will and ability to change the system, what alternative model should the nation embrace? Constitutions of nations in the modern era tend fall into four categories. 1.! Various forms of authoritarian government. These include absolute monarchies (emirates and sultanates of the Islamic world), personal dictatorships, oligarchies, theocracies (Iran) and single party rule (remaining real or nominal communist states). 2.! Parliamentary government based on the Westminster system with a largely ceremonial constitutional monarch or president. Most Western European countries, India, Japan, Israel and many former British colonies have this model with local variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparedness for Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals
    Preparedness for Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals Report No.PER/2017/2018/SDG/05 National Audit Office Performance Audit Division 1 | P a g e National preparedness for SDG implementation The summary of main observations on National Preparedness for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is as follows. 1. The Rapid Integrated Assesment (RIA) is a first step in the process of aligning the country,s national development plan or public Investment programme with SDGs and RIA reveals an uneven alignment between the policy initiatives in the 2017 -2020 Public Investment Programme and the SDG target areas for the economy as (84%) people (80%) planet (58%) peace (42%) and partnership (38%). 2. After deducting debt repayments, the Government has allocated Rs. 440,787 million or 18 percent out of the total national budget of Rs. 2,997,845 million on major projects which identified major targets of relevant SDGs in the year 2018. 3. Sri Lanka had not developed a proper communication strategy on monitoring, follow up, review and reporting on progress towards the implementation of the 2030 agenda. 2 | P a g e Audit at a glance The information gathered from the selected participatory Government institutions have been quantified as follows. Accordingly, Sri Lanka has to pay more attention on almost all of the areas mentioned in the graph for successful implementation of Sustainable Development Goals. 40.0% Alignment of budgets, policies 34.5% and programmes 35.0% Policy integration and coordination 30.0% 28.5% 28.3% 27.0% 26.6% Creating ownership and engaging stakeholders 25.0% 24.0% Identification of resources and 20.5% 21.0% capacities 20.0% Mobilizing partnerships 15.0% Managing risks 10.0% Responsibilities, mechanism and process of monitoring, follow-up 5.0% etc (institutional level) Performance indicators and data 0.0% 3 | P a g e Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tides of Violence: Mapping the Sri Lankan Conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre
    Tides of violence: mapping the Sri Lankan conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is an independent, non-profit legal centre based in Sydney. Established in 1982, PIAC tackles barriers to justice and fairness experienced by people who are vulnerable or facing disadvantage. We ensure basic rights are enjoyed across the community through legal assistance and strategic litigation, public policy development, communication and training. 2nd edition May 2019 Contact: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Level 5, 175 Liverpool St Sydney NSW 2000 Website: www.piac.asn.au Public Interest Advocacy Centre @PIACnews The Public Interest Advocacy Centre office is located on the land of the Gadigal of the Eora Nation. TIDES OF VIOLENCE: MAPPING THE SRI LANKAN CONFLICT FROM 1983 TO 2009 03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 09 Background to CMAP .............................................................................................................................................09 Report overview .......................................................................................................................................................09 Key violation patterns in each time period ......................................................................................................09 24 July 1983 – 28 July 1987 .................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Issue About the Independence of the Judiciary in Sri Lanka INTRODUCTION the Procedure Adopted by the Mahinda Rajapakse Government to Remove Chief Justice Dr
    Position Paper Impeachment against Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake and the Issue about the independence of the Judiciary in Sri Lanka INTRODUCTION The procedure adopted by the Mahinda Rajapakse government to remove Chief Justice Dr. (Mrs.) Shirani Bandaranayke from the office of Chief Justice through an impeachment1 has turned a dissension in to a serious crisis that alters the balance of power in the constitutional order of functioning of the Executive, Legislature and the Judiciary in Sri Lanka. Article 125 of the constitution that sets the However this construction of the constitution supreme law of the land, the judiciary is the only undermines the doctrine of separation of powers and exclusive institution empowered to interpret that requires the three institutions of the Executive, the provisions of the constitution. However, in this Legislature and the Judiciary to exercise state instance the legislature while disregarding the power subject to the checks and balances of the interpretation given by the Supreme Court also three institutions functioning independent of each refused to comply with the writ of Certiorari issued other. It has instead made governance subject to a by the Court of Appeal.2 duality of power exercised by the Executive and the Legislature. These checks and balances built in to The legislature contended that it [the legislature] the functioning of the three arms of the constitution was the sole repository of sovereignty of the would ensure good governance. The undermining people and hence was supreme and not subject of any one of these three institutions would have a to the authority of any other constitutional body.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interface Between Buddhism and International Humanitarian Law (Ihl)
    REDUCING SUFFERING DURING CONFLICT: THE INTERFACE BETWEEN BUDDHISM AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (IHL) Exploratory position paper as background for 4th to 6th September 2019 conference in Dambulla, Sri Lanka Peter Harvey (University of Sunderland, Emeritus), with: Kate Crosby (King’s College, London), Mahinda Deegalle (Bath Spa University), Elizabeth Harris (University of Birmingham), Sunil Kariyakarawana (Buddhist Chaplain to Her Majesty’s Armed Forces), Pyi Kyaw (King’s College, London), P.D. Premasiri (University of Peradeniya, Emeritus), Asanga Tilakaratne (University of Colombo, Emeritus), Stefania Travagnin (University of Groningen). Andrew Bartles-Smith (International Committee of the Red Cross). Though he should conquer a thousand men in the battlefield, yet he, indeed, is the nobler victor who should conquer himself. Dhammapada v.103 AIMS AND RATIONALE OF THE CONFERENCE This conference, organized by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in collaboration with a number of universities and organizations, will explore correspondences between Buddhism and IHL and encourage a constructive dialogue and exchange between the two domains. The conference will act as a springboard to understanding how Buddhism can contribute to regulating armed conflict, and what it offers in terms of guidance on the conduct of, and behavior during, war for Buddhist monks and lay persons – the latter including government and military personnel, non-State armed groups and civilians. The conference is concerned with the conduct of armed conflict, and not with the reasons and justifications for it, which fall outside the remit of IHL. In addition to exploring correspondences between IHL and Buddhist ethics, the conference will also explore how Buddhist combatants and communities understand IHL, and where it might align with Buddhist doctrines and practices: similarly, how their experience of armed conflict might be drawn upon to better promote IHL and Buddhist principles, thereby improving conduct of hostilities on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Amba Yahaluwo by T.B. Ilangaratne AMBA YAHALUWO PDF
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Amba Yahaluwo by T.B. Ilangaratne AMBA YAHALUWO PDF. Sirimavo Bandaranaike Leader of the Opposition: This article needs additional citations for verification. See 1 question about Amba Yahaluwo…. Galagedera Vidyalaya, GalagederaSt. The socio-economic classifications that surrounding them will n I loved the Sinhala novel, loved the Akba series and also loved the English translation which I borrowed from a student. Open Preview See a Problem? Celebrating Kandyan middle-class life”. Truly a wonderful a “coming of age” novel. Ilangaratne retired from politics on April 12, Abdul Cader Lakshman Kiriella M. Selvanayagam Senerath Somaratne S. Amba Yahaluwo by T.B. Ilangaratne. Siriwardena Bernard Soysa V. Feb 20, Thevuni Kotigala rated it it was amazing. Thanuja rated it it was amazing Jan 19, To ask other readers questions about Amba Yahaluwoplease sign up. Retrieved from ” https: Abdul Raheem rated yaaluwo really liked it Feb 01, Apr 24, Keshavi added it. T. B. Ilangaratne. Jul 21, Isini Thisara added it. Nadun Lokuliyanage rated it it was amazing Apr 30, Amba Yahaluwo was made into a television serial. Retrieved 19 May Hasini Anjala rated it liked it Jul 01, Nilu rated it it was amazing Feb 16, I loved the Sinhala novel, loved the TV series and also loved the English translation which I borrowed from a student. This is a wonderful story about two children To ask other readers questions about Amba Yahaluwoplease sign up. The socio-economic classifications that surrounding them will never let them be friend as they want to. Sanath Senarathne rated it liked it Oct 14, But if I had been able to translate it while Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia Judicial Barometer
    SOUTH ASIA JUDICIAL BAROMETER 1 The Law & Society Trust (LST) is a not-for- The Asian Forum for Human Rights and profit organisation engaged in human rights Development (FORUM-ASIA) works to documentation, legal research and advocacy promote and protect human rights, in Sri Lanka. Our aim is to use rights-based including the right to development, strategies in research, documentation and through collaboration and cooperation advocacy in order to promote and protect among human rights organisations and human rights, enhance public accountability defenders in Asia and beyond. and respect for the rule of law. Address : Address : 3, Kynsey Terrace, Colombo 8, S.P.D Building 3rd Floor, Sri Lanka 79/2 Krungthonburi Road, Tel : +94 11 2684845 Khlong Ton Sai, +94 11 2691228 Khlong San Bangkok, Fax : +94 11 2686843 10600 Thailand Web : lawandsocietytrust.org Tel : +66 (0)2 1082643-45 Email : [email protected] Fax : +66 (0)2 1082646 Facebook : www.fb.me/lstlanka Web : www.forum-asia.org Twitter : @lstlanka E-mail : [email protected] Any responses to this publication are welcome and may be communicated to either organisation via email or post. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publishers. Acknowledgements: Law & Society Trust and FORUM-ASIA would like to thank Amila Jayamaha for editing the chapters, Smriti Daniel for proofreading the publication and Dilhara Pathirana for coordinating the editorial process. The cover was designed by Chanuka Wijayasinghe, who is a designer based in Colombo, Sri Lanka. DISCLAIMER: The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of LST and FORUM-ASIA and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli-Sri Lankan Relationship
    The Israeli-Sri Lankan Relationship by Punsara Amarasinghe BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,962, March 12, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Following Indian premier Narendra Singh Modi’s historic visit to Israel in 2017, bilateral relations between India and Israel were elevated into a strategic partnership. But this was not Israel’s first successful diplomatic venture in South Asia. India’s tiny neighbor, Sri Lanka, had a strategic alliance with Israel long before India developed one. During the Cold War era, Sri Lanka was viewed as an Israeli success story in the region. Jewish relations with Sri Lanka have a long history that dates all the way back to the biblical epoch: the Sri Lankan city of Galle is said to be the city of Tarshish, to which King Solomon sent merchant ships. Beyond the biblical legacy, the Jewish presence in the island nation thrived under British rule, as many European Jews held prominent positions in the colonial administration. In the early stage of British rule, then Chief Justice of Sri Lanka Sir Alexander Johnston proposed the establishment of a Jewish settlement on the island, an idea that was not taken up by the colonial office in London. Both Israel and Sri Lanka became independent states in 1948. At Israel’s inception, it faced diplomatic hostility from the Arab world, and many post-colonial countries—including India—refused to recognize it as an independent state. But Sri Lanka’s first PM, D.S. Senanayake, initiated the island nation’s cooperation with Israel, despite the disapproval of many Asian and African states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Violent Tamil Insurrection in Sri Lanka, 1972-1987
    SECESSIONIST GUERRILLAS: A STUDY OF VIOLENT TAMIL INSURRECTION IN SRI LANKA, 1972-1987 by SANTHANAM RAVINDRAN B.A., University Of Peradeniya, 1981 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Political Science We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA February 1988 @ Santhanam Ravindran, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Political Science The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date February 29, 1988 DE-6G/81) ABSTRACT In Sri Lanka, the Tamils' demand for a federal state has turned within a quarter of a century into a demand for the independent state of Eelam. Forces of secession set in motion by emerging Sinhala-Buddhist chauvinism and the resultant Tamil nationalism gathered momentum during the 1970s and 1980s which threatened the political integration of the island. Today Indian intervention has temporarily arrested the process of disintegration. But post-October 1987 developments illustrate that the secessionist war is far from over and secession still remains a real possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • News Round Up
    NEWS ROUND UP Tuesday, February 05, 2019 Contents President raps politicians for country’s paralysis ......................................................................................... 2 Fraudulent ATM skimming: Industry says situation under control but urges vigilance ............................... 3 SL draws record $ 2.3 b FDI in 2018, eyes $ 3 b this year despite political challenges: Malik ..................... 4 Malik welcomes Dubai’s Essar for Rs. 30 b mixed development PPP in Battaramulla ................................. 5 US says eager to build on partnership with Sri Lanka .................................................................................. 6 Piramal Glass laments Govt. failure to reduce furnace oil prices ................................................................. 6 Who is fooling whom with another draft national maritime and logistics policy? ...................................... 7 Taprobane Securities (Pvt) Ltd – Research + 94 11 5328200 [email protected] President raps politicians for country’s paralysis President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday during his Independence Day address made a string of political and economic observations focusing on development, fighting corruption, holding provincial council elections and criticised actions during the recent Constitutional crisis and moves by the United National Party (UNP) to establish a National Government. Delivering his address to the nation to mark the 71st Independence Day, Sirisena took on several key issues and made fresh observations on
    [Show full text]